Public Expenditure and Financial Management;committee on development effectiveness;Committee for Development Effectiveness;Environmental and Social Safeguard;process ...  Voir la suite f harmonization;national poverty reduction strategy;global partnership for development;united nations population fund;public financial management system;monitoring and evaluation system;climate change and biodiversity;multilateral development bank;performance measurement system;delegation of authority;international development community;international financial institution;international labour organization;Public Procurement System;project cycle management;generally accepted practice;ex post review;quality at entry;overseas development assistance;requests for proposal;community of practice;global environmental challenge;series of workshops;human resource management;environmental management system;aggregate fiscal discipline;public sector procurement;human resource development;international environmental cooperation;process of convergence;information technology system;financing development;degree of decentralization;informed decision making;partnerships between governments;global environmental benefits;clarity and consistency;effectiveness of aid;allocation of resource;multilateral development institution;Electronic Government Procurement;organizational change management;partner country;Country Systems;allocation system;harmonization effort;international cooperation;donor agencies;decentralization process;budget support;technical cooperation;organizational level;decentralization effort;development cooperation;Safeguard Policies;donor support;diagnostic work;donor coordination;management framework;multilateral agency;aid effectiveness;aggregation technique;competitive bidding;adaptive management;approval process;safeguard policy;government system;transaction cost;government leadership;financial reporting;development policy;civil works;donor policies;train activity;basic knowledge;private-sector development;important component;agency review;Consulting services;international trends;approval procedure;technical standard;regulatory implication;performance contract;computer support;review period;council meeting;Lending Product;recipient countries;investment lending;individual transaction;clearance process;information demand;budget revision;delivery status;public fund;government participation;sustainable way;procurement practice;ongoing work;evaluation capacity;procurement aspects;core system;Cash Transfer;harmonization of standard;external partner;mutual accountability;development vision;external assistance;external stakeholder;local ngo;global benchmark;professional group;Borrowing Countries;fiduciary capacity;monitoring tool;study estimate;continuous assessment;development mission;specialized agency;accounting standards;vulnerable group;national system;diagnostic exercise;operational guidance;developmental benefit;strategic allocation;public money;performance rating;administrative authority;national policy;interagency cooperation;pilot program;sector programs;operational reform;common feature;collaborative approach;population figures;allocation scheme;monitoring data;common weaknesses;response system;government ownership;financial system;management agenda;staff capacity;Donor countries;program planning;management culture;logical framework;program performance;qualitative information;budget policy;strategic framework;management tool;bureaucratic requirement;conceptual framework;management strategy;multilateral institution;common problems;incentive structure;task forces;information exchange;environmental result;bilateral aid;specific performance;aggregate result;multiple sources;audit procedure;civil society;quantitative indicators;continuous process;middle management;international agency;national capacity;prior review;procurement activities;preparatory work;local ownership;common guidelines;evaluation process;capacity enhancement;broad consensus;business case  Réduire