information and communication technology;Environmental and Social Safeguard;market value of land;agriculture and forestry;sanitary and phytosanitary standards;monitoring ...  Voir la suite and evaluation arrangement;external monitoring and evaluation;environmental and social management;Environmental and Social Impact;monitoring and evaluation plan;land acquisition;standard of living;grievance redress mechanism;acquisition of land;land use right;loss of income;income generation activities;Good Agricultural Practices;adverse social impact;compensation for loss;public service delivery;resettlement action plan;loss of land;compensation at replacement;loss of asset;opportunity for woman;method of valuation;land acquisition process;construction of facilities;cost of resettlement;payment of compensation;risk management infrastructure;possession of land;International Water;law and regulation;cost of land;entitlement to compensation;forced child labor;loss of livelihood;market information system;agricultural trade policy;Agricultural Value Chain;water user group;investment in rehabilitation;loss of harvest;cost of transport;community base;development of infrastructure;Social Impact Assessment;private service provider;infrastructure and facilities;financing development;social and environmental;participation in planning;resettlement and rehabilitation;court of law;compensation for land;types of property;types of asset;place of work;degree and type;replacement cost;physical resettlement;displaced person;income restoration;income source;living standard;quality seed;civil works;irrigation scheme;public consultation;vulnerable group;affected persons;monitoring plan;small Works;compensation payment;Safeguard Policies;farming system;safeguard policy;Social Assessment;informed choice;involuntary resettlement;gender action;gap analysis;legal framework;movable asset;productive asset;legal right;eligibility criterion;market price;ethnic group;transfer tax;Natural Resources;land title;farm produce;baseline survey;compensation rate;technical department;resettlement assistance;compensation policy;water access;affected households;productive partnership;resettlement plan;agricultural production;processing equipment;construction activities;project impact;productive infrastructure;irrigation land;male youth;mitigation measure;internal monitoring;indigenous people;domestic law;Fixed Assets;immovable asset;Indigenous Peoples;market rate;land owner;living condition;poverty threshold;traditional rights;capacity constraint;land holder;subproject preparation;community facility;forestry law;social screening;local knowledge;legal owner;social group;emergency operation;product quality;relocation support;management capacity;operational efficiency;physical losses;urban flood;replacement rate;subproject implementation;private asset;farm product;compensation arrangements;community level;household head;private company;subproject appraisal;asset loss;adverse possession;irrigation channel;legal title;government management;assets management;information requirement;financially support;lost land;cost study;local craft;organizational procedures;asset valuation;eminent domain;negotiated agreement;state agency;borrower country;livelihood rehabilitation;extensive consultation;asset acquisition;transaction cost;crop product;grazing land;sustainable use;environmental legislation;cash compensation;land property;resettlement compensation;water resource;Land tenure;district authority;fishing ground;fish pond;export policy;mandatory requirement;resettlement sites;institutional environment;farm machinery;private institution;participatory approach;compensation plan;annual budget;average price;conservation zone;transparent procedure;resettlement preparation;baseline information;Host Communities;displacement problem;agricultural machine;project effectiveness;socioeconomic survey;agriculture input;export legislation;salvage material;safeguard measure;local population;matching grant;equal access  Réduire