expenditure and financial accountability;measurement error;degree of measurement error;quality of service delivery;quality of public service;Freedom of Information Act ...  Voir la suite Democratic Republic of Congo;presence of measurement error;freedom of the press;dimension of governance;indicators of governance;measure of governance;notions of governance;types of indicator;control of corruption;aggregate indicator;measure of corruption;Rule of Law;public sector accountability;Public Sector Organizations;area of governance;freedom of speech;Governance and Anticorruption;institutions for markets;public procurement contract;Public Sector Governance;legal framework governing;level of governance;national budget process;access to information;aggregate governance indicator;law and regulation;lack of knowledge;piece of legislation;per capita income;civil society group;interpretation of rule;household survey;individual indicator;governance outcome;measuring governance;anticorruption commission;commercial risk;regulatory environment;standard deviation;democratic accountability;good governance;legal right;survey respondent;aid donor;empirical measure;standard error;survey data;governance reform;Public Spending;subjective judgment;business entry;data provider;empirical evidence;country survey;individual data;public good;high correlation;anticorruption agency;survey questions;constitutional rule;cultural bias;non-governmental organization;unobserved governance;parliamentary system;halo effect;conditional expectation;empirical indicator;electoral process;cross-country comparison;net effect;statistical methodology;governance levels;subjective governance;petty corruption;average responses;corruption perception;response bias;sampling design;long lags;regulatory burden;public view;business community;rating agency;local expert;good information;country rating;common good;passing legislation;existing law;political orientation;political capital;statutory requirement;public sphere;commercial organisation;regulatory regime;institutional environment;sampling error;measurement challenges;budget procedure;industrial country;country ranking;empirical work;aid recipient;universal suffrage;monitoring progress;election monitoring;Business Registration;Political Systems;outcome measure;factual information;public servant;governance assessment;cross-country differences;database records;macroeconomic forecast;budget outcome;enforcement mechanism;recipient countries;general assessment;commercial source;governance risk;Infant Mortality;government stability;constitutional arrangement;cross-country data;multiple sources;composite indicator;commercial rates;Corruption Assessment;external expert;individual response;innovative techniques;political interference;social interaction;domestic stakeholders;Public Goods;public policy;political process;legislative branch;social resource;legal requirement;voting arrangement;Pending Approval;horizontal axis;electoral institution;weighting scheme;amnesty international;policy purposes;institutional performance;media freedom;common knowledge;single source;benchmark system;representative survey;  Réduire