      -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 12% 10% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Growth (New) 2007 2008 2009 Growth (Old) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Decompostion of Investment, 2015 Decompostion of Investment, 2015 (New Series) (Old Series) 7,5% 43,9% 37,9% 54,7% 56,1% Construction Mach&Equip Other assets Construction Mach&Equip -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% Mexico Hungary Brazil Croatia South Africa Poland Indonesia Czech Philippines Malaysia Serbia Iran 2003-2007 Romania Bulgaria Turkey (Old) Turkey (New) Slovakia Russia India China Croatia Hungary Romania Czech Serbia Bulgaria Mexico Russia South Africa Slovakia Iran Turkey (Old) 2008-2011 Poland Turkey (New) Malaysia Brazil Average GDP Growth Rates Philippines Indonesia India China Iran Croatia Serbia Brazil Russia Bulgaria Czech South Africa Hungary Slovakia Poland Mexico 2012-2015 Romania Turkey (Old) Malaysia Indonesia Turkey (New) Philippines India China Total Investment (2015) Gross National Savings (2015) 50 50 45 45 40 40 Percent of GDP Percent of GDP 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 Serbia Malaysia Philippines Romania Turkey (Old) Brazil Poland Mexico Indonesia Hungary Turkey (New) Croatia Russia Bulgaria India China Czech Republic Argentina South Africa Serbia Brazil Turkey (Old) Bulgaria Romania Hungary Malaysia Philippines Indonesia Mexico Poland Croatia Russia India Turkey (New) Czech Republic China Argentina South Africa ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 We would like to thank to TURKSTAT officials Enver Taştı, Tülay Korkmaz, A. Kürşat Dosdoğru, Mehmet Ilgar, and Cevdet Öğüt for their valuable contributions to this note. 2 Household final consumption is calculated by using Classification of Individual Consumption by Purpose (COICOP) and commodity flow method. 3 TURKSTAT updated the reference year as 2009 which was previously 1998. 4 The GDP growth rate, which was 4 percent at 1998 prices in 2015, increased to 6.1 percent along with the revision. One of the main reasons behind this significant revision was switching to double deflation method. In 2015 oil prices were at very low levels and input costs declined remarkably, and the upward revision in real value added was substantial.