environmental service;sustainable use of marine;provision of water supply;excessive use of groundwater;quality of water supply;right to natural resource;promotion of ...  Voir la suite nvestment opportunity;security of tenure rights;sustainable use of resources;open access;open access resource;natural resource sector;land use options;natural resource base;water resource;critical watershed;net present value;local climate conditions;Natural Resources;Natural Resource Management;conflict resolution mechanism;growth and development;maintenance of water;surface water quality;water pollution charge;economic rent;Marine Protected Area;domestic water supply;flow of service;department of agriculture;cost of access;Marine Protected Areas;surface water pollution;natural resource utilization;lack of regulation;depletion of groundwater;constraints to growth;community forest management;liters per second;high value uses;local capacity building;degraded natural resources;disaster risk management;raw water value;municipal water use;coastal resource management;domestic water requirements;flow of water;surface water source;fee for water;information on investment;insecurity of tenure;natural resource managers;impact of mine;sources of water;service delivery arrangement;land use category;marginal revenue product;water permit system;direct use value;competing land use;indirect use value;Supply of Water;industrial tree plantation;coastal water resources;Rural Growth;mineral reservation;productive use;forestland use;illegal logging;River basin;fishing water;watershed rehabilitation;forestry sector;watershed function;allocation system;natural hazard;rural area;public welfare;forest land;forest reserve;soil erosion;production area;policy requirement;environmental infrastructure;coastal area;watershed management;administrative charge;environmental hazard;private enterprise;forest vegetation;alternative use;lease area;protection status;commercial sector;National Institutions;payment mechanism;fishing permit;Hydroelectric Power;natural capital;groundwater recharge;secure tenure;soil nutrient;aquatic habitat;natural forest;forest ecosystem;fishing effort;domestic production;existing law;Coral Reef;fish habitat;watershed degradation;private agency;payment arrangement;Rural Sector;water yield;resource users;fishing license;Grasslands;water district;economic instrument;commercial fisher;irrigation water;pasture land;tailings impoundment;public support;positive value;natural environment;public domain;groundwater stock;political will;timber harvest;market linkage;marine resource;electricity companies;fund source;stock inventory;environmental funds;forest product;land size;wood processor;foreshore areas;allocation process;remedial action;environmental charge;project costing;water table;environmental sector;adequate compensation;sustainable resource;dry season;base flow;subsidy system;rainy season;resource service;sustainable level;fishery sector;enforcement agency;direct investment;personal benefit;productivity level;open-access resource;stock depletion;groundwater quality;mining lease;productive resource;financial benefit;Host Communities;entrepreneurial function;income opportunity;soil fertility;economic sector;persistent poverty;participatory approach;local source;permit holders;government units;community welfare;groundwater withdrawal;free access;ground water;marine protection;foregone income;water supplies;coastal communities;private ranchers;marine habitat;coastal ecosystem;vegetation type;fee revenue;electricity sale;environmental action;degraded watersheds;institutional condition;subsequent efforts;resource flow;agriculture sector;erosion rate;local stakeholder;mangrove areas;sea grass;municipal mayor;watershed approach;pollution source;municipal ordinance;excessive withdrawal;local fishing;fishery license;territorial water;habitat destruction;forestry statistic;rural economy;flood protection;regulatory authority;enforcement capacity;beneficial use;paddy field  Réduire