81216 enGender Impact: The World Bank’s Gender Impact Evaluation Database Community Programs and Women's Participation: The Chinese Experience Author(s) David Coady, Xinyi Dai, Limin Wang Contact lwang@worldbank.org Country China Organizing Theme Voice and Agency, Economic Opportunities and Access to Assets Status Completed Intervention Category Collective Action Sector Social Development Using household-level data specifically collected for the purpose of evaluation, we empirically evaluate the impact on household income of a rural program in China that focuses on increasing women’s economic and social participation in the local community. We find that the program substantially increases women’s participation and household income, and also generates positive social benefits. Our results also suggest that the income gains accrue to Abstract participants only, and partly at the expense of non-participants. We find that the magnitude of the program impacts depends sensitively on the program’s ability to increase participation rates within villages. In the presence of the program, individual participation helps to avoid the negative externalities and to buy into the positive gains accruing to participants. Our results support the view that effectively implemented gender-focused interventions can have substantial social benefits when supported by the necessary legal and institutional framework. Gender Connection Gender Focused Intervention Gender Outcomes Gender disaggregated income, aspirations IE Design Instrumental Variable The Population Control and Community Development Project is a gender-focused community program intended to help women identify a range of economic and social Intervention opportunities and facilitate the development of public and community institutions. The program involved agricultural seminars and extension services, organized cultural activities and political meetings. Women were provided priority access to these services. Intervention Period 1993- A household survey was conducted for 57 villages with 38 treatment villages and 19 control Sample population villages. The study compares localities that implemented the program with localities that did not have Comparison conditions the program. Unit of analysis Individual Level Evaluation Period The study uses data from 1996 Last updated: 14 August 2013 1 enGender Impact: The World Bank’s Gender Impact Evaluation Database The program increases household income by between 19.4 percent and 28 percent The impact of individual participation is higher for treatment villages, but negative for control villages. Similarly, the effect of program treatment is positive for participants (an increase in income of 169 percent) and negative for non-participants (decrease in income of 114 percent). As for the role of village participation rates, the results suggest that the magnitude of the program positively depends on the ability of the program to increase participation rates, that is Results if the program increases participation rate, then its income impact will also increase substantially. In the case of the social externalities of the program, the analysis demonstrated that the project had a substantial effect on reducing the probability of preferring boys over girls. In addition, the results show that the program reduced the probability of valuing male over female labor by 23 percent. Finally, the program also reduced the probability of wanting a large family by 7 percent. The period between the program implementation and the survey (three years from 1993 to 1996) is too short to observe any significant change occurring within households in regards to fertility outcomes. Secondly, the information directly related to such issues is limited to Primary study measures on children's education and attitudes towards fertility and gender, which face a limitations problem of subjectivity since they reflect expressed views rather than actual preference observed through actions. However, the authors highlight that it is changes in attitudes rather than any other indicator such as lower fertility rate that the program participation is expected to impact. Funding Source Coady, D., Dai, X., & Wang, L. (2001). Community programs and women's participation: The Reference(s) Chinese experience (No. 2622). World Bank, East Asia and Pacific Region, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit. Link to Studies http://elibrary.worldbank.org/docserver/download/2622.pdf?expires= 1366642890&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=89D0452C932A280C455AD5B24621CBA2 Microdata Last updated: 14 August 2013 2