88171 ARTF Results Matrix 2014 Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund C O N TA C T I N F O World Bank Kabul Office Street 15, House 19 Wazir Akbar Khan Kabul, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan Telephone: 0700-27-60-02 Ditte Fallesen ARTF Coordinator dfallesen@worldbank.org All documents are available on http://www.worldbank.org/artf A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 2 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRYONYMS AEP A F G H A N EX PAT R I AT E P R O G R A M MUDH M i n i s try of Urban D e v e l opm e nt A F M IS A fghan i s tan F i nanc i a l and H o u s i ng M anag e m e nt Informat i on NERAP N at i ona l Em e rg e nc y R u ra l S y s t e m A cc e s s P ro j e ct AFN A fghan i s — Loca l C u rr e nc y NGO N on - G ov e rnm e nta l of A fghan i s tan O rgan i z at i on A IS A A F G H A N IS TA N I N V ES T M E N T SU P P O RT A G E N C Y N P B SE N on - p e n s i on - ba s e d Sa l ary ARAP A fghan i s tan R u ra l A cc e s s E x p e nd i t u r e P ro j e ct NPP N at i ona l P r i or i t y P rogram ARDS A fghan i s tan R e con s tr u ct i on NRAP N at i ona l R u ra l A cc e s s and D e v e l opm e nt S e rv i c e s P rogram AREDP A fghan i s tan R u ra l Ent e rpr i s e N S P III T h i rd Em e rg e nc y N at i ona l D e v e l opm e nt P ro j e ct So l i dar i t y P ro j e ct A RT F A fghan i s tan R e con s tr u ct i on NSP N at i ona l So l i dar i t y P rogram T r u s t F u nd O&M O p e rat i on s and M a i nt e nanc e A S D P Sk i l l s D e v e l opm e nt P ro j e ct OFWM Farm Wat e r M anag e m e nt A S D P SE C O N D A F G H A N IS TA N Sk i l l s pro j e ct D e v e l opm e nt P ro j e ct PA M P e rformanc e A s s e s s m e nt M atr i x C AW SS C e ntra l A u thor i t y for Wat e r S u pp ly P B SE P e n s i on - ba s e d Sa l ary E x p e nd i t u r e and S e w e rag e PFM P u b l i c F i nanc i a l M anag e m e nt CBR C apac i t y B u i l d i ng for R e s u lt s P P F M R S e cond P u b l i c F i nanc i a l Fac i l i t y M anag e m e nt R e form P ro j e ct CDC C omm u n i t y D e v e l opm e nt PPU P roc u r e m e nt P o l i c y Un i t C o u nc i l PRR P r i or i t y R e form and R e s tr u ct u r i ng CDP C omm u n i t y D e v e l opm e nt P l an PSDP P ow e r S y s t e m D e v e l opm e nt DAB D a A fghan i s tan B ank P ro j e ct E Q UI P Ed u cat i ona l Q u a l i t y RAP R e s e arch and A na ly s i s Improv e m e nt P rogram P rogram F S F i d u c i ary Standard s RNHP R e hab i l i tat i on of N agh l u GoA G ov e rnm e nt of A fghan i s tan H y dropow e r P l ant HLP H ort i c u lt u r e and L i v e s tock P rogram S A S u p e rv i s ory A g e nt I A R C S C Ind e p e nd e nt A dm i n i s trat i v e S H A R P Str e ngth e n i ng H e a lth R e form and C i v i l S e rv i c e C omm i s s i on A ct i v i t i e s for th e R u ra l P oor I D A Int e rnat i ona l D e v e l opm e nt S H E P Str e ngth e n i ng H i gh e r A s s oc i at i on Ed u cat i on P ro j e ct I M F Int e rnat i ona l M on e tary F u nd S O E Stat e m e nt of E x p e nd i t u r e s I R D P Irr i gat i on R e s torat i on and TA F S T e chn i ca l A s s i s tanc e and D e v e l opm e nt F e a s i b i l i t y St u d i e s JS D P A fghan i s tan J u s t i c e S e rv i c e TSA T r e a s u ry S i ng l e A cco u nt D e l i v e ry P ro j e ct U N A M A Un i t e d N at i on s A s s i s tanc e K A M S P P K ab u l - Ay bak / M a z ar - e - Shar i f M i s s i on i n A fghan i s tan P ow e r P ro j e ct U N D P Un i t e d N at i on s D e v e l opm e nt LE P Lat e ra l Entry P rogram P rogram MA M on i tor i ng A g e nt U N O P S Un i t e d N at i on s O ff i c e for MC M anag e m e nt C omm i tt e e P ro j e ct S e rv i c e s MCP M anag e m e nt C apac i t y P rogram US A I D Un i t e d Stat e s A g e nc y for MDG M i l l e nn i u m D e v e l opm e nt G oa l Int e rnat i ona l D e v e l opm e nt MEW M i n i s try of En e rg y and Wat e r WB W or l d B ank M F I M i crof i nanc e In s t i t u t i on W R D TA P Wat e r R e s o u rc e s D e v e l opm e nt M IS FA M i crof i nanc e Inv e s tm e nt and T e chn i ca l A s s i s tanc e P ro j e ct S u pport Fac i l i t y for A fghan i s tan MoC M i n i s try of C omm u n i cat i on M oE M i n i s try of Ed u cat i on MoF M i n i s try of F i nanc e M o FA M i n i s try of F or e i gn A ffa i r s MoPW M i n i s try of P u b l i c W ork s MRRD M i n i s try of R u ra l R e hab i l i tat i on and D e v e l opm e nt A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 3 Key Features STRUCTURE The Results Matrix provides an overview and aggregated results of the Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund (ARTF) portfolio. The Matrix outlines horizontally a number of National Priority Programs (NPPs). Under each NPP indicators for ARTF portfolio output and outcome results are listed that feed into the NPPs. . Reading from right to left the Matrix provides the implementation progress and flow: from inputs (ARTF financing and projects) to milestones/outputs to outcomes and indicators. CONTENT ARTF outcomes, indicators, milestones and outputs have been defined in line with the individual results frameworks in each of the ARTF projects as well as the Incentive Program and Recurrent Cost financing. Some of the indicators, milestones and outputs may relate to a single ARTF project (if it is the only project in that area) to a group of ARTF projects which contribute to that specific element (e.g. “roads rehabilitated” will aggregate data from both the rural roads projects as well as from NSP). The Results Matrix does not include all available indicators for all ARTF financed projects. All projects financed by ARTF have individual detailed results frameworks, which are accessible on the ARTF website. While the Results Matrix does not currently report results at the sector level, this is an area that will be further explored as part of future work on results tracking and reporting under the ARTF. UPDATES The ARTF Results Matrix is updated twice a year and made available at the ARTF website. Once a year it is included in the published ARTF Scorecard under Pillar II. The reported progress data relates to the latest available data provided by all the ARTF projects at the time of the update. Progress data for some of the milestones, outputs and outcome indicators might not change from one reporting period to another due to either a different data collection schedule or due to implementation pace of related activities. LINKAGES The output and outcome results of the ARTF portfolio are in the Matrix linked to the National Priority Programs (NPPs) and their defined objectives. NPP output/indicators are not included here as few of the NPP results frameworks are fully developed. As these mature the indicators can be added to the ARTF Results Matrix. It should be noted, however, that Government and the respective line ministries will be responsible for tracking progress under the NPP indicators and results frameworks. While the ARTF feeds into the indicators agreed under the Tokyo Mutual Accountability Framework (TMAF), these indicators are not included in this Results Matrix as they are not linked directly to outputs/outcomes of the ARTF portfolio. Select process oriented TMAF indicators will instead be captured under Pillar IV in the ARTF Results Management Framework as they are key to measuring the organizational effectiveness of the trust fund. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 4 RESULTS HIGHLIGHTS PROGRESS AS OF JUNE 2013 • PROJECT HIGHLIGHT: In the last reporting period NSP reached $1.2 billion in total amount of block grants disbursed directly to CDCs to finance priority infrastructure projects in the communities. The number of qualified teachers reached 156,683 up from 27,000 in 2008. This is an increase of 309%. • DIRECT BENEFICIARIES UNDER ARTF PROJECTS2: The approximate current number of beneficiaries of the ARTF is 8.1 million people for all the projects3 (except NSP), with 38% of female beneficiaries. The NSP is currently reaching 22.4 million beneficiaries, of which 48.5 % are female. • ACCESS TO SERVICES: The following table provides a snapshot of the number of beneficiaries under the ARTF program with access to services including basic services and livelihoods and jobs. The results are based on output/outcomes of individual projects but are aggregated when possible. Please find more detailed information in the full Matrix below. BASIC SERVICES LIVELIHOOD AND JOBS 8,643,940 3,982 EG members (63% female) ACCESS TO EDUCATION (38% female) ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT and 2,200 NIMA graduates (30% female) ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY 3,218,000 ACCESS TO SHORT-TERM 39.5 million labor days EMPLOYMENT ACCESS TO ROADS 6,512,000 ACCESS TO SAVINGS AND 48,076 (42% female) ACCESS TO WATER AND 7,049,000 ENTERPRISE SUPPORT SANITATION SERVICES ACCESS TO AGRICULTURAL AND/OR 178,0004 (50% female)/3,907,000 IRRIGATION SERVICES NOTE: Footnotes begin at number 2. 2 The same beneficiaries could be reached with different services; aggregation is therefore not always accurate and while efforts are made to avoid double counting it cannot entirely be ruled out. 3 Please note, not all projects are able to count the number of beneficiaries. Rural Roads, power projects, health and governance are therefore not included in this count. 4 An average of 7 people per household is assumed. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 5 AGRICULTURE NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: NATIONAL WATER AND NATURAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT Ensure effective utilization together with proper management of existing water and other natural resources to accelerate agriculture productivity and provide safe drinking water and hygienic environment with viable rural energy options for rural prosperity. ARTF Outcomes and Indicators Increases in agricultural, horticultural and livestock productivity in targeted areas ARTF Milestones/Outputs ARTF Portfolio 01 Increase in agricultural Baseline 2.5 t/ha (2011) Progress 2.5 t/ha (2012) M1 Area provided Baseline 300,000 ha (2011) ONGOING productivity with irrigation and (irrigated wheat yields) (t/ha) Target 2.88 t/ha (2017) drainage service8 Progress 0 National Horticulture (ha) Target 395,000 ha and Livestock (2017) ARTF: US$100 m On-Farm Water Management NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION AND MARKET DEVELOPMENT ARTF: US$25 m Sustain economic growth through improved employment and income opportunities for rural people by means of enterprise development, credit and access to land. Irrigation Restoration and Development 02 People with access to Baseline 0 (2011) Progress 178,000 (52%)/ M2 New Orchards Baseline 0 (2012) Progress 5,406 ha (2013) ARTF: US$49.3 m IDA: US$97.8 m agricultural and/or irrigation (including vineyards) services6 (% female) 3,907,000 (NSP) (2013) established with at Target 8,000 ha (2018) Target 1.7 million people least 70% survival Inputs Delivery (50%) (2017) rate (ha) Improvement Project ARTF: US$75 m PIPELINE M3 Adoption Baseline 10 % (2008) Progress 67% (2013) rate of improved Strategic Grain Reserves technology among Target 70 % (2018) ARTF: US$18 million target farmers10 (%) 6 Some projects count households. An average of 7 people per household is assumed. 8 This refers to either new areas or improved service for already existing areas. 10 Defined as improved technology in production and health care. Adoption of new technologies is a reflection of changed behavior and improved capacity of farmers. This element is key to sustain the achievements in productivity. This should in the future result in increases in productivity. When data for NHLP can be captured in productivity terms it will be added to the outcome indicator. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 6 RURAL DEVELOPMENT NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: STRENGTHENING LOCAL INSTITUTIONS Build the capacity of CDCs to enable them to function as village level governance bodies and facilitate communities’ gainful participation in various sectoral programs. ARTF Outcomes and Indicators Build, strengthen and maintain Community Development Councils as effective institutions for local governance and social-economic development12 ARTF Milestones/Outputs ARTF Portfolio 04 Communities with Baseline 31,000 CDCs elected through democratic processes (2013) M4 Number of sub- Baseline 0 (2003) Progress 71,031 (2013) elected and functioning CDCs project proposals ONGOING (CDCs conducting elections/ Progress 96.7% (2013) financed Target NA re-elections as per mandated Target 80 %13 (2015) National Solidarity procedures (%) Program III US$1.5bn: 05 Number of beneficiaries Baseline 0 (2003) Progress 22.4 million people M5 Total amount Baseline 0 (2003) (start of ARTF: US$750 m with access to improved of block grants NSP III in 2010: IDA: US$40 m services14 as a result of (49% female) (2013) disbursed directly to US$662 million) completed NSP sub-projects15 Target 25 million (50% female) CDCs ($) Progress US$1.2 billion Rural Enterprise (2015) (2013) Development Project Target NA15a (footnote: AREDP has been 06 Number of labor days16 Baseline 0 (2003) Progress 39.5 million (2013) M6 Female CDC Baseline 38% (2010) Progress 39% (2013) restructured and as generated by sub-project members (%) a result targets have implementation Target NA Target More than a third been revised) of CDC members ARTF: US$6.23 m are women (2015) IDA: US$30 m NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION AND MARKET DEVELOPMENT Afghanistan Rural Sustain economic growth through improved employment and income opportunities for rural people by means of enterprise development, credit and Access Program access to land. US$332m: Improved rural employment; and development of rural enterprise groups17 ARTF: US$207 m IDA: US$125 m 07 Increase in direct Baseline 0 (2010) Progress 31% (35 female M7 Total amount of Baseline 0 (2010) employment through project savings collected by Progress AFs 107 million/ supported Enterprise Groups members) (2013) Savings Groups and US$ 1.9 million (EG) (%) Target 20% increase in direct Village & EGs (2013) employment through EGs Target NA (35% female) (2015) 08 Amount of savings Baseline 0 (2010) Progress AFS 85 million for M8 Beneficiaries Baseline 0 (2010) inter-lended to members participating in Progress 48,676 (42 % are of SGs, EGs and VSLAs for 10,900 borrowers Saving Groups and women) (2013) productive and consumption (2013) Enterprise Groups Target NA20 (35 % are purposes Target NA (% female) women) (2015) NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: NATIONAL RURAL ACCESS PROGRAM Promote equitable economic growth by providing year-round access to basic services and facilities in rural Afghanistan. Improved rural access 09 The proportion of rural Baseline 5.8 million (2012) Progress 6,497,000 million M9 Total rural Baseline 0 (2002) population living within roads rehabilitated Progress 15,000 km (2013) 2 km of all season road (2013) and maintained Rural Target TBD21 (2017) Target TBD19 (2017) Roads (km) 12 As this is a demand-driven project where CDCs prioritize sub-projects for financing targets are not 16 A labor day is defined as 8 hour of paid work. This covers both skilled and un-skilled work. established for all indicators. 17 This project is a pilot and is so far active in 394 villages in 20 districts spread over 5 provinces 13 80 % of the baseline CDCs are conducting elections/re-elections as per mandated procedures. (Balkh, Bamyan, Herat, Nangarhar and Parwan) 14 Services under NSP sub-projects: water, irrigation, education, health, power, roads etc. 19 The target including both NSP and NERAP/ARAP is being established. 15 Note, there will be several who benefit from more than one subproject, and also from both first and 20 The target for number of beneficiaries should not be established as focus should be on the quality second block grants, but they are counted only once here. of the groups established rather than the number of members. 15a The size of the blockgrants is determined by the number of households in a community, averaging 21 The NSP target for rural roads is being established. US$20-30,000 with a maximum of US$60,000. While not knowing the size of communities, it is not possible to establish a target. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 7 INFRASTRUCTURE NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: NATIONAL ENERGY SUPPLY Provision of sufficient electricity through affordable and sustainable electricity supplies. ARTF Outcomes and Indicators Improved power supply and access to electricity in the targeted areas ARTF Milestones/Outputs ARTF Portfolio 10 Increase in the number Baseline 0 (2004) Progress 3,219,000 (NSP)(2013) M10 Distributions Baseline 0 (2008) Progress 138 KM (2013) ONGOING of beneficiaries with new (medium voltage - and rehabilitated metered Target 126,000 (2014)22 20kV + low voltage)/ Target 626 KM24 (2014) Power System Development connections to the grid in the Transmission (110kV) Project target areas (footnote: Some lines constructed or US$60 m projects count households. rehabilitated under An average of 7 people per the project23 (Km) Naghlu Hydropower household is assumed.) Rehabilitation Project Preparation Grant ARTF: US$4.9 million National Solidarity Program III US$1.5bn: ARTF: US$750 m IDA: US$40 m PIPELINE Naghlu Hydropower Rehabilitation Project ARTF: US$80 million 22 As NSP is a demand-driven project where CDCs prioritize sub-projects for financing, a target cannot be established. This target therefore only captures the Power System Development Project. 23 Distribution: the km of medium and low voltage distribution network built or rehabilitated, and measured/verified using Operational Acceptance Certificate; Transmission: the km of high voltage transmission line built or rehabilitated, and measured/verified using Operational Acceptance Certificate 24 Two power projects closed during this reporting period and as a result progress and target changed. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 8 HEALTH NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: HEALTH FOR ALL AFGHANS Improved health status of Afghans resulting from increased access to and expansion of health services. ARTF Outcomes and Indicators Improved access to basic health services and systems, particularly for pregnant women and children25 ARTF Milestones/Outputs ARTF Portfolio 12 Proportion of health Baseline 28,9 (2010/2011) Progress 38.60 (2013) M12 Number of health Baseline 0.9 (2008) Progress 1.6 (2013) ONGOING facilities providing consultations per person complete services as Target 60 (2018) per year27 Target 2 (2018) SEHAT: System Enhancement described in BPHS 2010 for Health in Transition US$407 million IDA: US$100 m 13 Births attended by Baseline 24% (2007/08) Progress 39% (2010/11) M13 Proportion of Baseline 74% (2012) Progress 74% (2013) ARTF: US$270 m skilled attendants (%) health facilities staffed HRBF: US$7 m Target 58% (2018) with at least one female Target 86% (2018) GIRoA: US$30 m health worker ARTF IP 2012-2014: US$375 m 14 Scorecard score Baseline 50.4 (2004) Progress 70.4 (2010)26 M14 The operating Baseline Afs 2.2 billion (2011) examining quality of care budget (including ARTF Recurrent Cost Baseline in health facilities Target 76 (2018) Operations and Progress Afs 1.8 billion (2012) Financing (average score) Maintenance, code 22) 2012-2014: US$450 m increases in line with Target Afs 3.7 billion agreed norm-based (2014) budget allocation applied in the Ministry of Public Health (amounts) (ARTF IP)28 25 Due to the monitoring set-up of the health program (third party monitoring managed by Ministry of Public Health) covering the entire country the outcome indicators under health are not only attribut- able to ARTF financed interventions. However, since ARTF is key contribution, which will increase only under the new SEHAT, these outcome indicators are still included here. 26 Since 2004 the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) has shown remarkable improvement in the quality of care in Afghanistan. In 2010 MoPH revised the content of the BSC as well as its benchmarks resulting in a different and lower score. Therefore, from 2011 the score will not be comparable with previous years. 27 Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) has in the past used an indicator on BPHS coverage, showing contractual coverage, percentage of population living in districts which have service providers to deliver the BPHS. Recently, however, MoPH has discontinued the use of this indicator as it does not capture outreach and mobile services to remote and isolated parts of the country. It also does not capture the fact that people may have physical access to health facilities, but may still not make use the services. MoPH therefore uses instead the utilization indicator, which is expressed in form of number of consul- tation per person per year. 28 Budget execution rates of the budget are assumed to remain constant. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 9 EDUCATION NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: EDUCATION FOR ALL Improve Access to Basic and Secondary Education ARTF Outcomes and Indicators Increased equitable access to quality education, especially for girls29 ARTF Milestones/Outputs ARTF Portfolio 15 Increase in girls’/ Baseline 6.3 million (36% girls) (2008) M15 Number of Baseline 0 (2007) Progress 6715 (2012) ONGOING boy’s enrollment (basic rehabilitated or built education) (number) Progress 7.8 million31 additional class rooms at Target 7330 (2014)34 Second Education Quality (percentage of girls)30 (38% girls) (2012) primary level33 Improvement Program Target 8.5 million EQUIP II US$313m: (42% girls) (2014) ARTF: US$283m IDA: US$30 m 16 Grade 12 completion Baseline 103,622 (71,832 boys/31,790 girls) M16 Number of Baseline 37,000 (2008) Progress 160,515 (2013) girls/boys additional qualified Skills Development (2012)32 teachers as a result of Target 200,000 (2014) US$29 m: Progress 178,635 (109,335 EQUIP financing35 ARTF: US$9m boys/69,299 girls) IDA: US$20 m (2013) Target 170,000 (2014) Higher Education System Improvement Project 17 Average student Baseline 78% (2010-2011) Progress 82% (2012) M17 The Operations Baseline Afs 173.5 million (2011) Preparation Grant attendance (percentage) and Maintenance budget ARTF: US$4.9 m Target 84% (2014) (code 22) increases in Progress Afs 69.5 million line with agreed norm- (2012) ARTF IP based budget allocations Target Afs 210 million 2012-2014: US$375 m applied in the Ministry of (2014) Education (ARTF IP)36 ARTF Recurrent Cost Baseline Financing NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: SUSTAINABLE DECENT WORK THROUGH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT POLICIES FOR 2012-2014: US$450 m JOB-RICH GROWTH Effectively prepare Afghan nationals for the Labor Market PIPELINE Increased access to high quality vocational education and training NATEJA ARTF: US$15 m 18 Share of NIMA Baseline 0% (2008) Progress 52% (30% female) M18 Number of Baseline 0 (2008) Progress 18,980 (24 %) Higher Education System graduates employed six beneficiaries receiving Improvement Project months after completing (2013) skills development (2013)36a ARTF: US$50 m training (first cohort: a Target 80% (2014) training (female %) Target 21,095 (30%) total of 1510 students) (%) (2014) 19 Increase in average Baseline Women AFN417 / Youth AFN 2160 per earnings of project graduates (TVET) within month (2008) 6 months of completing Progress Women AFN3428/ Youth AFN8158 per month (2013) Target Women AFN3000/ Youth AFN9300 per month (2014) 29 A learning assessment will be initiated in 2013 with results to be shared in 2014. Based on 33 Including EQUIP I and II and NSP this learning assessment an indicator measuring learning outcomes will be included in the Results 34 As NSP is a demand-driven project where CDCs prioritize sub-projects for financing targets are Matrix. not available. 30 Direct project beneficiaries are defined as children (boys and girls) enrolled in schools in grades 35 A qualified teacher has 14 years of schooling including 12 years of primary and secondary school 1-12 in general education. Since data on total population numbers is missing gender parity cannot and 2 additional years at a teachers training college. be measured. 36 Budget execution rates of the budget are assumed to remain constant. 31 EQUIP finances both the construction/rehabilitation of class rooms as well as school quality en- 36a The average female percentage can be split into two sub-groups: Soft skills (32 %) and hard hancement grants to all schools in Afghanistan. This total number of enrolled students are therefore skills (9 %). The hard skills consist of auto-mechanics and technology, which drag down the aver- all benefitting from ARTF. age. 32 Baseline is from 2010-2011 – completion rates were not tracked prior to this. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 10 GOVERNANCE NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM (PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ROADMAP) Strengthening the Budget in driving effective delivery of key priority outcomes; Improving Budget Execution; and Increasing Accountability and Transparency ARTF Outcomes and Indicators Strengthen Public Financial Management ARTF Milestones/Outputs ARTF Portfolio 20 Improved PEFA ratings Baseline PEFA rating 2.00/2.00 (2008) M20 Number of Baseline 4/WB grant audits39 ONGOING for external/internal audit internal/external Progress 2.00 (some progress audits verified as (2011) but too early to affect done to international Progress 4/ WB grant Capacity Building for Results PEFA rating)/ 2.50 auditing standards audits US$100m: (based on draft PEFA Target 34/ WB grant ARTF: US$100m Update 2013); impact audits and will be calculated after 9 regulatory Public Financial Management fiscal year end audits (2014) II US$73m: Target 3.00 (2014)/ 3.00 ARTF: US$73m (2014) Justice Services Delivery II US$:85m: 21 Procurement done by Baseline 0 (2011) Progress 48% (2013) M21 Number of Baseline 7 (2011) ARTF: US$40m line ministry using stand- Procurement Units Progress 13 (2012) alone procurement (%) Target 50% (2014) of line ministries Target 61 (2014) ARTF IP and provincial 2012-2014: US$375 m offices restructured for stand-alone ARTF Recurrent Cost Baseline procurement Financing 2012-2014: US$450 million NPP’S KEY OBJECTIVE: EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT Strengthen the institutional, organizational, administrative and individual capacities of the Government at both central and local levels to enable more efficient and effective service delivery, economic growth, justice, stabilization and security. Strengthened Performance of Line Ministries37 22 Number and percent of Baseline 0 Progress 0 M22 Number of Baseline 70/ 0% (2012) Progress 97/50 % Tier 3 ministries achieving senior management progress on at least 1 Target TBD (When the first group (SMG) positions (2013) service targeted in their ministries initiate increases with a Target 750/ 20 % CBR programs to increase their results percentage of SMG (2017) over the course of CBR38 frameworks under deployed to the sub- CBR) national level40 M23 Number of Baseline 8 (2011) Progress 21 (2013) ministries who have completed pay and Target 23 (2017) grading increases41 Fiscal sustainability through (reform-linked) increasing domestic revenue mobilization and strengthening expenditure management 24 Increase in customs Baseline Afs 30 billion (2012) revenue Progress Afs 28.3 billion (2013) Target 25% increase (2015) 25 Increase of the Open Baseline Score 21 (2012) Progress Score 59 (2013) Budget Index score Target Score 48 (2015) 39 Audits are carried out annually of projects financed under the World Bank (ARTF/IDA etc.). This amounts been approved. As noted previously, one Tier 3 candidate has been approved to now develop its CBR to about 40 audits a year. program proposal. 37 The Capacity Building for Results Facility (CBR) is in the process of further developing its monitoring 40 This indicator measures the increase in the absolute number of senior management positions and evaluation framework. New indicators may therefore be added as this work progresses. as well as the percentage of these that are deployed to the sub-national level. 38 Given the demand-driven approach to CBR, we cannot populate any data until Tier 3 ministries have 41 Completion is defined as a ministry that has recruited 60% of its reformed tashkeel. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 11 ANNEX I: INDICATOR DEFINITIONS AGRICULTURE DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY INDICATOR O1: Increase in agricultural productivity (irrigated wheat yields) (t/ha) Productivity will be measured as M&E Seasonal Annual, end of the average variation in irrigated crop survey, project (impact wheat yields, in tons per hectare Project Monitoring evaluation) in the targeted areas. Information system (PMIS), follow-up surveys, impact evaluation INDICATOR O2: People with access to agricultural and/or irrigation services (% female) This indicator measures the Guidance on “water users”: This refers to the recipients of irrigation M&E Seasonal crop Annual number of people who are provided and drainage services, i.e. the owners or, in case the land is leased, the survey, Project MIS with irrigation and drainage lessees of the land provided with irrigation and drainage services. services or any other agricultural support service. INDICATOR M1 Area provided with irrigation and drainage service (ha) This indicator measures the Guidance on “irrigation and drainage services”: This refers to the better Project Bi-annually total area of land provided with delivery of water to, and drainage of water from, arable land, including implementation irrigation and drainage services better timing, quantity, quality, and cost-effectiveness for the water users. reports under the financed projects, including in (i) the area provided Guidance on “new irrigation and drainage services”: This refers to with new irrigation and drainage the provision of irrigation and drainage services in an area that has not services, and (ii) the area had these services before. The area is not necessarily newly cropped or provided with improved irrigation newly productive land, but is newly provided with irrigation and drainage and drainage services, expressed services, and may have been rainfed land before. in hectare (ha). Guidance on “improved irrigation and drainage services”: This refers to the upgrading, rehabilitation, and/or modernization of irrigation and drainage services in an area with existing irrigation and drainage services. INDICATOR M2: New Orchards (including vineyards) established with at least 70 % survival rate (ha) Newly developed orchards Annual outcome Annual and supported by the project with monitoring /Project end-of project a survival rate of saplings M&E of different kind of crops as measured one year after the initial development. INDICATOR M3: Adoption rate of improved technology among target farmers (%) This indicator measures the Guidance on adoption: a change of practice or change in use of a Annual outcome Annual and number of farmers who have technology that was introduced/promoted by the project. Measured as the monitoring/ end-of project adopted an improved agricultural target farmers that have adopted at least 5 elements of the horticulture Project M&E technology promoted by the package promoted by the project. project. Guidance on “technologies”: The term technology includes a change in practices compared to currently used practices or technologies (seed preparation, planting time, feeding schedule, feeding ingredients, post- harvest, storage, processing, etc.). If the project introduced or promotes a technology package in which the benefit depends on the application of the entire package (e.g., a combination of inputs such as a new variety and advice on agronomic practices such as soil preparation, changes in seeding time, fertilizer schedule, plant protection, etc.) – this will count as one technology. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 12 RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY Indicator O4: Communities with elected and functioning CDCs (CDCs conducting elections/re-elections as per mandated procedures (%) A functioning Community Development Councils (CDCs) is one Post Implementation Biannual that meets regularly, records the minutes of the meetings, shares Monitoring (PIM) information within the community, holds re-elections every three and Implementation years through secret ballot and open election for CDC membership Monitoring (IM) including the CDC executive committee which comprise of the reports four CDC office-bearers, namely the: (a) Chairperson, (b) Vice- Chairperson, (c) Secretary, and (d) Treasurer. Indicator O5: Number of beneficiaries with access to services as a result of completed NSP sub-projects Number of community members both male and female who either PIM report –focus Biannual directly utilize or benefit from the completed functional sub group discussion projects and facilities funded by the NSP block grants. Indicator O6: Number of labor days generated by sub-project implementation These are the number of skilled and unskilled labor days worked MIS at project level At completion of during the implementation of sub projects. Laborers are paid sub projects hourly/daily wages at market rates. Indicator O7: Increase in direct employment through project supported Enterprise Groups (EG) (%) AREDP identifies and organizes rural entrepreneurs from the MIS at project level Biannual existing Savings Groups into EGs aiming to maximize their economic potential, skills and leverage economies of scale to increase the value of their sales. The no. of EG members will therefore be counted as a direct employee. Indicator O8: Amount of savings inter-lended to members of SGs, EGs and VSLAs for productive and consumption purposes Village Savings and Loan Associations, formed from federated MIS at project level Biannual Savings Groups also address the financial needs of EG members for business investment. VSLA and SG members will meet regularly and save an agreed amount of money which will be inter-loaned amongst members for productive and consumption purposes. Indicator O9: The proportion of rural population living within 2 km of all season road This indicator is measured as the proportion of rural people in the Guidance on all-season road: An all- Project MIS Biannual project area who live within 2 kilometers (typically equivalent to season road is a road that is motorable a 20-minute walk) of an all-season road. This indicator is also all year by the prevailing means of known as Rural Access Index (RAI). rural transport (often a pick-up or a truck which does not have four-wheel- drive). Predictable interruptions of short duration during inclement weather (e.g. heavy rainfall) are acceptable, particularly on low volume roads. Indicator M4: Number of sub-project proposals financed These are the sub projects proposal which are prioritized by the Project MIS Biannual CDC members and approved by NSP- PMU engineers. NSP pays 90% of the cost through the block grant into the CDC bank account and the remaining 10% is paid by the community in cash or in- kind as part of their “Community Contribution.” A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 13 RURAL DEVELOPMENT (continued) DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY Indicator M5: Total amount of block grants disbursed directly to CDCs ($) Each CDC after completing their Community Development Plan Project MIS Biannual received a Block grant to implement their priority sub-projects. The block grant amount is determined by the number of families in a community at the rate of US$ 200 per family, but with a maximum ceiling of US$ 60,000 per community. The average block grant per community is est. at US$ 33,000. INDICATOR M6: Female CDC members (%) This is the percentage of women who are CDC members. Project MIS Biannual Indicator M7: Total amount of savings collected by Savings Groups and Village & Loans Association members This indicator will track the amount of money saved by SGs and Project MIS Biannual VSLAs in Afs. And Dollars. Indicator M8: Beneficiaries participating in Saving Groups and Enterprise Groups (% female) Total number of members of the Savings and Enterprise Groups Project MIS Biannual formed by the project. Indicator M9: Total rural roads rehabilitated and maintained Rural Roads (km) This indicator measures the cumulative number of kilometers of Project MIS Biannual all roads constructed, reopened to motorized traffic, rehabilitated, gravelling or upgraded by: (i) the NSP CDCs using their block grants; and (ii) funds from the NERAP/ARAP projects. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 14 INFRASTRUCTURE DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY Indicator O10: Increase in the number of beneficiaries with new and rehabilitated connections to the grid in the target areas. This indicator measures the number of people that have received Guidance on people with electricity ARTF Report/ Power Annual an electricity connection via new and rehabilitated connections connection: Data on the number of people project report aimed at connecting households. with electricity connections is estimated by multiplying the actual number of household connections with an estimate of the average household size assuming about 7 people per household. This indicator covers both NSP and power projects financed by the ARTF. A target cannot, however, be established under the NSP due to the nature of the project. The target therefore only covers the power project(s). Indicator M10: Distribution (medium voltage - 20kV + low voltage)/Transmission (>20kV) lines constructed or rehabilitated under the project (Km) Supplemental data for this indicator: distribution or transmission transformer capacity added (MVA) This indicator measures the length of the transmission and ARTF Report/ Annual distribution lines constructed or rehabilitated/upgraded and the Electricity project amount of transformer capacity added under the project. For report purposes of allocating the incremental transformer capacity to distribution or transmission, it is counted by the higher voltage at which it is rated—hence any transformer with a higher voltage rating of 20kV or less is counted as distribution transformation. Any transformer with a higher rating of >20kV is counted as transmission transformation. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 15 HEALTH DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY Indicator O12: PENTA3 coverage among children aged between 12 -23 months in lowest income quintile (%) No. of children 12-23 months in lowest income quintile who Household Survey Every 2 years received PENTA3 vaccine before their first birthday. (Third Party Denominator: Total No. of children 12-23 months in lowest income Monitoring and CSO) quintile. (The data will be disaggregated by gender) Indicator 013: Births attended by skilled attendants (%) This indicator measures the cumulative number of women who HMIS/HHS Annual/Every two delivered with the assistance of a health provider as a result of years ARTF activities. This indicator includes deliveries by a skilled health provider (specialist or non-specialist doctor, midwife, nurse or other health personnel with midwifery skills). Deliveries by trained or untrained traditional birth attendants are excluded. It captures deliveries by skilled health providers either in health facilities or homes of pregnant women. Indicator 014: Scorecard score examining quality of care in health facilities (average score) Definition: Scorecard result examining quality of care in health HFA Annual facilities (average score): Composite score out of 100 on indices of quality of care as judged by the third party. The Health Sector of Afghanistan adopted the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a tool to measure and manages the performance in delivery of Basic Package of Health Services throughout the country. The BSC provides a framework to efficiently look at several key areas or domains of the health sector. Each domain is made up of several indicators that provide information about performance in that domain. Provincial results are color coded and for each indicator upper and lower benchmarks have been defined based on the performance found across the provinces in Afghanistan. This allows the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) and other stakeholders in the health sector to quickly visualize the performance of each province for each indicator. Indicator M12: Number of health consultations per person per year This indicator measures the number of OPD clients/patients seen at HMIS Annual all health facilities. Indicator M13: Proportion of health facilities staffed with at least one female health worker Number of BPHS supported health facilities with at least one HMIS/HFA Annual female health worker (doctor, midwife or nurse). Indicator: M14: The operating budget (including Operations and Maintenance, code 22) increases in line with agreed norm-based budget allocation applied in the Ministry of Public Health (amounts) (ARTF IP) Amount of annual O&M budget appropriations result from AFMIS/MoF Annual calculations based on a norm agreed between MoH and MoF. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 16 EDUCATION DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY Indicator O15: Primary Education Beneficiaries girls/boy (number) (percentage of girls) All children enrolled in schools supported by various interventions EQUIP Unit, Annual /components of EQUIP: (i)School grants—physical infrastructure calculated using improvement grants and quality enhancement grants, (ii) teacher EMIS data collected and principal education and in-service training; and (iii) improved every year monitoring and evaluation systems. These components are aimed at promoting equitable access to basic education, improving quality of education and for strengthening capacity for better management and service delivery. Indicator 016: Number of students attending EQUIP constructed Schools All students enrolled in newly constructed schools financed by EQUIP Unit, Annual EQUIP, denoting newly improved access and hence all additional calculated using students reached out with education facility. EMIS data collected every year Indicator O17: Average student attendance (percentage) The Average number of students present in the class as percentage EMIS Annual of the total number of students enrolled in the class. Indicator O18: Share of NIMA graduates employed six months after completing training (first cohort: a total of 1510 students) (%) NIMA graduates that have successfully completed the training and Project MIS Annual that have a remunerated employment six months after the date of completion of the training. Indicator O19: Increase in average earnings of project graduates (TVET) within 6 months of completing training Average earnings of graduates within 6 months of successfully Project MIS Annual completing the TVET program compared to the earnings before the TVET program. Indicator M15: Number of rehabilitated or built additional class rooms at primary level This indicator measures the number of additional classrooms Civil Works unit of Annual constructed or rehabilitated at the primary level through the ARTF EQUIP program. Indicator: M16: Number of additional qualified teachers as a result of EQUIP financing This indicator measures the number of additional qualified Teacher Education Annual teachers made available in the teaching force through different Department (TED) types of teacher training programs financed by the ARTF program. of the Ministry of Education Indicator M17: The Operations and Maintenance budget (code 22) increases in line with agreed norm-based budget allocations applied in the Ministry of Education (ARTF IP) Amount of annual O&M budget appropriations result from AFMIS/MoF Annually calculations based on a norm agreed between MoE and MoF. Indicator 018: Number of beneficiaries receiving skills development training (female %) Number of people participating in any of the skills development Project MIS Annual trainings that are offered by the projects. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 17 GOVERNANCE DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY Indicator O20: Improved PEFA* ratings for external/internal audit PI-21 in PEFA covers Effectiveness of Internal Audit—Regular The internal and external audit indicators PEFA report Every 3-5 years and adequate feedback to management is required on the are covered under 3 indicators in the performance of the internal control systems, through an internal PEFA study (PI-21, PI-26 and PI-28). audit function. Such a function should meet international These broadly cover effectiveness of standards such as ISPPIA (International Standards for the internal audit, scope/nature/follow up of Professional Practice in Internal Audit, issued by Institute of external audit and legislative scrutiny Internal Auditors). The internal audit function may be undertaken of external audit reports. Each of the 3 by an organization with a mandate across entities of the central indicators have 3 dimensions against government of by separate internal audit functions for individual which government performance is government entities. The combined effectiveness of all such audit assessed and scored, and these scores organizations is the basis for this indicator. This indicator is are used to come up with single PEFA scored against 3 dimensions - coverage and quality of internal rating per indicator. There have been audit function, frequency and distribution of reports, and extent of two PEFA studies for Afghanistan - the management response to internal audit findings. first assessment was done in June 2005 and a repeat assessment was done in PI 26 and 28 covers scope/nature/follow up of external audit and December 2007. The PEFA ratings in legislative scrutiny of external audit reports respectively—A the December 2007 repeat assessment high quality external audit is an essential requirement for creating were 2 for effectiveness of internal audit transparency in the use of public funds. Key elements of the and scope/nature/follow up of external quality of actual external audit comprise the scope/ coverage of audit, and 2+ for legislative scrutiny. the audit, adherence to appropriate auditing standards including The rating for legislative scrutiny saw independence of the external audit institution, focus on significant an improvement over the June 2005 systemic PFM issues in its reports, and performance of the full assessment, while the ratings for the range of financial audit. PI 26 is scored against 3 dimensions other two indicators remained status quo. - scope/ nature of audit performed, timeliness of submission of A repeat PEFA assessment is currently audit reports to legislature, and evidence of follow up on audit ongoing, and the final report is expected recommendations. to be out by August 2013. The results of this assessment will determine the The legislature has a key role in exercising scrutiny over the improvements made or otherwise to the execution of the budget that is approved. The common way this is PEFA scores. done is through a legislative committee that examines the external audit reports and questions responsible parties about the findings of the reports. This indicator is scored against 3 dimensions - timeliness of examination of audit reports by the legislature, extent of hearings on key findings undertaken by the legislature, and issuance of recommended actions by the legislature and implementation by the executive. *PEFA stands for Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 18 GOVERNANCE (continued) DEFINITION GUIDANCE DATA SOURCE FREQUENCY Indicator: O21: Procurement done by line ministry using stand-alone procurement (%) Percentage of stand-alone procurement done by line ministries Project MIS Annual compared to other procurement modalities. Indicator: O22: Number and percent of Tier 3 ministries achieving progress on at least 1 service targeted in their CBR programs to increase over the course of CBR Tier 3 ministries achieving progress on at least 1 service as CBR Reports Annual described and agreed in their respective CBR programs. It will be measured over the course of the CBR implementation in number of ministries achieving this target as well as in percent of the total participating ministries. Indicator O24: Increase in customs revenue This indicator measures the revenue mobilization effort of customs AFMIS/MoF Annually as compared to the previous year’s collection. Indicator: O25: Increase of the Open Budget Index score This indicator measures progress in budget transparency over time. Open Budget Annually The indicator relies on the rating of the open budget index which is Initiative compiled by the open budget initiative. Indicator M20: Number of Ministries that conduct internal audits/Percentage of external audits of development budget The internal audits indicator measures progress in strengthening MoF/CAO Annually internal controls, while the external audit indicator measures external audits of development budget performed in line with international standards. Indicator M21: Number of procurement units of line ministries and provincial offices restructured for stand-alone procurement Procurement units of line ministries and provincial offices Project MIS Annual restructured for stand-alone procurement in line with the established guidelines. Indicator: M22: Number of senior management group (SMG) positions increases with a percentage of SMG deployed to the sub-national level Number of CBR Senior Management Group staff (Grades Project MIS Annual 1 and 2) in participating line ministries increases. All participating ministries can receive 4 common function SMGs. Ministries qualifying for Tiers Two and Three support can receive a larger numbers of SMG staff, and this should increase over time as more ministries implement their CBR programs. Indicator M23: Number of ministries who have completed pay and grading increases Ministries will be assisted to complete the government’s Pay and Project MIS Annual Grading process, which moves government staff onto an 8 grade, uniform pay scale. Includes all ministries (23) except MOI and MOD. Completion is measured as a ministry having recruited 60% of its reformed tashkeel. A R T F R e s u l t s M a t r i x 2 0 14 19 Afghanistan Reconstruction Trust Fund The ARTF was established in 2002 World Bank Kabul Office Street 15, House 19 to provide a coordinated financing Wazir Akbar Khan Kabul, Islamic Republic of Afghanistan mechanism for the Government of Telephone: 0700-27-60-02 Afghanistan’s budget and national Bob Saum Country Director investment projects. Eleven years later, rsaum@worldbank.org the ARTF is the largest single source of Illango Patchamuthu Operations Manager on-budget financing for Afghanistan’s pillangovan@worldbank.org development. The ARTF remains the Ditte Fallesen vehicle of choice for pooled funding, ARTF Coordinator dfallesen@worldbank.org with low transaction costs, excellent Paul Sisk transparency and high accountability, Task Team Leader, Recurrent Cost Financing psisk@worldbank.org and provides a well-functioning arena Anantha Krishna Karur for policy debate and consensus Financial Management Analyst akarur@worldbank.org creation (External Evaluation 2012 In Washington DC: “ARTF at a Cross-Roads”). The ARTF Anthony Cholst is delivering important results within Country Program Coordinator acholst@worldbank.org key sectors including education, Henriette von Kaltenborn-Stachau health, agriculture, rural development, Senior Country Officer hvkaltenborn@worldbank.org infrastructure, and governance. It is Marcia Whiskey also the World Bank’s largest multi- Senior Country Program Assistant donor trust fund. As of June 30, 2013, mwhiskey@worldbank.org the ARTF has received a total of US$6.7 All documents are available on billion from 33 donors. http://www.worldbank.org/artf