Table of Contents CGIAR Financial Report 2000 68109 OVERVIEW: 29 YEARS OF CGIAR INVESTMENT (1972–2000) 27 FINANCIAL REPORT 2000 28 Introduction 28 Overall Financial Outcome 28 Composition of Funding 28 Sources of Funding 28 Program Investments 28 Center Highlights 28 Co-Sponsor Support 29 Financial Position 29 2000 CGIAR FUNDING 33 CGIAR Contributions 33 Evolution of 2000 Support to the Approved Research Agenda 33 Overall Financial Outcome 34 Contribution Profile 34 Disbursements 36 Center Perspective 39 Funding Modalities 41 Unrestricted Support 41 Restricted Support 41 Co-Sponsor Support 41 World Bank Support 41 AGENDA RESOURCES 44 Allocation of Resources 44 By Undertaking 44 By Region 44 By Object of Expenditure 44 Cost Changes 45 CGIAR Investments over 29 Years 45 FINANCIAL POSITION 50 Net Assets 50 Unappropriated Net Assets 53 Appropriated Net Assets 53 Net Fixed Assets 53 Capital Purchase Fund 53 Liquidity 53 Current Ratio 56 Working Capital 56 COMPLIANCE WITH FINANCIAL GUIDELINES 58 Acronyms and Abbreviations 26 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 23 Table of Figures, Tables, and Boxes Figure 1 CGIAR funding, 1996–2000 33 Figure 2 Agenda contributions by Member group, 1999–2000 34 Figure 3 Contributions by Center and Member group, 2000 35 Figure 4 Top 13 contributors, 2000 37 Figure 5 Center support by top 13 contributors, 2000 37 Figure 6 Disbursement of funds, 2000 38 Figure 7 Funding by Center, 2000 38 Figure 8 Funding outcomes vs. financing plans, 2000 39 Figure 9 Changes in Center funding, 1999–2000 40 Figure 10 Agenda funding by funding type, 2000 40 Figure 11 Distribution of World Bank support, 2000 42 Figure 12a Investments in CGIAR undertakings, 2000 45 Figure 12b Center investments in increasing productivity 46 Figure 12c Center investments in protecting the environment 46 Figure 12d Center investments in saving biodiversity 47 Figure 12e Center investments in improving policies 47 Figure 12f Center investments in strengthening NARS 48 Figure 13 CGIAR allocations by developing region, 2000 49 Figure 14 CGIAR expenditure by object, 2000 49 Figure 15 Net assets by Center, 2000 50 Figure 16 Unappropriated net assets by Center, 2000 51 Figure 17 Net fixed assets by Center, 2000 51 Figure 18 Capital purchase fund by Center, 2000 54 Figure 19 Member receivables by Center, 2000 54 Figure 20 CGIAR System current ratio, 1996–2000 55 Figure 21 Working capital by Center, 1999–2000 55 Box 1 Annual Financial Decisionmaking Process and Schedule 31 Box 2 Financial Concepts and Terminology 32 Table 1 CGIAR Financial Highlights, 1996–2000 30 Table 2 Contributions by Other Donors, 1999 and 2000 36 Table 3 Allocation of World Bank Funding, 1999–2000 43 Table 4 CGIAR System Financial Position, 1996–2000 52 24 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ANNEX TABLES Table A1.1 CGIAR Contributions to the Approved Research Agenda by Member, 1972–2000 59 Table A1.2 CGIAR Contributions to the Approved Research Agenda by Center, 1972–2000 60 Table A2.1 Ranking Contributions to the CGIAR Research Agenda, 1997–2000 61 Table A2.2 CGIAR Funding by Member, 2000 62 Table A2.3a Support to the Agreed Research Agenda by Member by Center, 2000 63 Table A2.3b Member Support to the Approved Research Agenda by Center, 2000 64 Table A2.4a Monthly Disbursement of Funding by Member, 2000 65 Table A2.4b Member Contributions Disbursed through the World Bank, 1999–2000 66 Table A2.5 CGIAR Funding by Center, 2000 67 Table A2.6 Funding Outcome by Center, 2000 68 Table A2.7 CGIAR System Grants by Center, 1996–2000 69 Table A2.8 World Bank Funding by Center, 1996–2000 70 Table A3.1 CGIAR Investments by Center, 1996–2000 71 Table A3.2 CGIAR Research Agenda Investments by Activity, 1996–2000 72 Table A3.3 Centers’ Research Agenda Investments by Activity, 2000 73 Table A3.4 Regional Allocations, 2000 74 Table A3.5 CGIAR Object Expenditures, 2000 75 Table A3.6 CGIAR Staffing, 1996–2000 76 Table A3.7 Centers’ Inflation Rates, 1996–2000 77 Table A4.1 Centers’ Financial Positions, 2000 78 Table A4.2 Capital Investments by Centers, 1996–2000 79 Table A5.1 CGIAR Total Investments, 1972–2000 80 Table A5.2 CGIAR Total Expenditures and Sources of Revenue, 1991–2000 81 Table A6.1 CGIAR Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 82 Table A6.2 CIAT Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 83 Table A6.3 CIFOR Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 84 Table A6.4 CIMMYT Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 85 Table A6.5 CIP Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 86 Table A6.6 ICARDA Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 87 Table A6.7 ICLARM Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 88 Table A6.8 ICRAF Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 89 Table A6.9 ICRISAT Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 90 Table A6.10 IFPRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 91 Table A6.11 IITA Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 92 Table A6.12 ILRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 93 Table A6.13 IPGRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 94 Table A6.14 IRRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 95 Table A6.15 ISNAR Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 96 Table A6.16 IWMI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 97 Table A6.17 WARDA Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 98 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 25 Acronyms and Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank AFDB African Development Bank ASB Alternatives to Slash and Burn CGIAR Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research DAC Development Assistance Committee (OECD) EC European Commission FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GHG Greenhouse gases GNP Gross national product HIV/AIDS Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome ICW International Centers Week (CGIAR) IDRC International Development Research Centre IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IMF International Monetary Fund IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPM Integrated Pest Management MTM Mid-Term Meeting (CGIAR) MTP Medium-term plan (CGIAR) NARS National agricultural research system(s) NGO Nongovernmental organization ODA Official Development Assistance OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PwC Pricewaterhouse Coopers SGRP Systemwide Genetic Resources Program SPIA Standing Panel on Impact Assessment TAC Technical Advisory Committee (CGIAR) TIGR The Institute for Genomic Research UNDP United Nations Development Programme USAID United States Agency for International Development 26 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Overview: 29 Years of CGIAR Investment (1972–2000) This 29-year time series analysis of CGIAR investments con- Recent trends in total production sector and commodity firms expected trends and reveals some less obvious patterns investments confirm that natural resource management as well. increasingly has become a focus of CGIAR activity. By far the largest commodity group has been cereals, which As expected, the oldest Centers account for the largest share accounts for 45 percent of commodity-sector investments. Of of the total $6.3 billion invested. On the high end, IRRI and that group, rice has accounted for nearly half of the invest- IITA account for 13 percent and 12 percent of the total, ment—$1.1 billion (20 percent overall). Wheat and maize respectively. CIAT and CIMMYT each account for 11 percent each accounted for about $0.5 billion (9 percent). In 2000, of the total. ICRISAT and ILRI, the livestock enterprise, and its cereal expenditures remained at 39 percent. Legumes and predecessors ILCA and ILRAD, each account for 10 percent roots, or tubers, each accounted for 15 percent to 16 per- of the total; ICARDA and CIP account for 8 percent and 7 cent of commodity-sector investments; these shares have var- percent, respectively. The remaining eight Centers together ied little. In the production sectors, the share of investments account for 18 percent of investment. At the Center level, in crops and livestock has been falling, while that in forestry investment levels have stabilized. and fisheries has been climbing. Increasing productivity has been the largest component, Sub-Saharan Africa has received the largest regional share totaling 54 percent overall. Since the early 1990s, however, of investments, accounting for $2.6 billion (42 percent of this undertaking has been receiving a smaller proportion of total expenditure). That share has been fairly constant over funds, so that by 2000 it accounted for only 36 percent of time. Investments in Asia, mainly in crops, have been $1.9 all investments. An increasing share of funding has been billion (30 percent). If the majority of investments in livestock directed to environmental, biodiversity, and policy undertak- are subtracted from the CGIAR's total investments in Africa, ings. Of interest, and perhaps of some surprise, is the steady crop investments in Africa approximately equal those in Asia investment, totaling 21 percent overall, in strengthening of during the 29-year period. NARS. Object-of-expenditure data reveal two interesting trends. First, investments in CGIAR capital assets were relatively much higher in the early years, when the Centers’ physical plants were established. But as a share of total investment, these investments have decreased from 24 percent in the first five-year period to 5 percent (represented by depreciation) in 2000. Second, personnel costs decreased from 55 per- cent of the total expenditure in the mid-1980s to 49 percent in 2000. This percentage reduction is significant in dollar terms because of the large overall share of personnel costs ($3.3 billion). ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 27 Financial Report 2000 Introduction PROGRAM INVESTMENTS The funding goal for 2000 was to attain the level of funding Program investments in 2000 were $338 million, a decrease approved at ICW99: $340 million. CGIAR Members con- of $9 million (3 percent) from 1999. Distribution of tributed $331 million—$9 million (3 percent) less than the resources by undertaking was consistent with the 2000- approved funding goal but $1 million more than actual fund- financing plan. Efforts to increase productivity, the major ing of $330 million for 1999. The primary reason for the thrust of CGIAR activities, accounted for 36 percent of total shortfall was the reduced dollar value of contributions aris- investments (up from 34 percent in 1999). Within this under- ing from weaker European currencies. taking, crops accounted for 71 percent of investment, live- stock for 13 percent, forestry for 12 percent, and fisheries for 4 percent. Within increasing productivity, investments in OVERALL FINANCIAL OUTCOME germplasm enhancement and in production systems develop- Member funding of $331 million, Center-generated income ment increased marginally. Investment in protecting the of $14 million, and extraordinary European Commission environment accounted for 18 percent of total investment (EC) relief funding of $5 million ($2 million from reserves; (down from 20 percent in 1999). Investment in policy and $3 million in an advance of 2001 funding) totaled $350 research increased from 13 percent to 14 percent. Invest- million in funding to Centers. Eighteen percent of this con- ment in biodiversity preservation remained at 10 percent. tribution remained unpaid by the end of the year, however, Investment to strengthen NARS decreased from 23 percent to forcing Centers to curtail expenditures. Total expenditures 22 percent. in 2000 were $338 million. The resulting surplus of $12 In 2000, there were no changes in investment by region. million replenished the Systems’ aggregate unappropriated Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, West Asia and North Africa net assets that had been depleted by $7 million in 1999 (WANA), and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) because of the funding default. Included in the $12 million accounted for 42 percent, 32 percent, 17 percent, and 9 per- surplus is an advance of $3 million of 2001 income and a cent of total investment, respectively. transfer of $2 million from System reserves to Center The trend of lower expenditures for personnel costs con- reserves. tinued. In 2000, personnel expenditures decreased to 49 per- cent of total expenditures from 50 percent in 1999. In COMPOSITION OF FUNDING In 2000, unrestricted support was 50 percent ($164 million) absolute terms, these expenditures decreased from $172 mil- of total support, compared with 54 percent ($179 million) in lion in 1999 to $164 million in 2000. In percentage terms, 1999. Restricted support was $167 million (50 percent) of they represent a 7 percent decrease from the 1994–95 aver- total Member funding, compared with $151 million (46 per- age of 56 percent. cent) in 1999. CENTER HIGHLIGHTS SOURCES OF FUNDING Funding for four Centers was at or above levels approved at The total CGIAR Membership was 58, of which the number ICW99. They were CIMMYT, $4.9 million (up 15 percent); of contributing Members was 55. Uganda was a new contrib- , IRRI, $3.8 million (up 13 percent); CIP $2.5 million (up 14 utor in 2000. percent); and CIFOR, $0.2 million (up 2 percent). Industrialized countries provided $225 million (68 per- Funding for eight Centers was within 10 percent of, and cent) of total support in 2000. This figure was in line with the thus broadly in line with, financing plan targets: ICARDA, 1999 amount of $226 million (68 percent) of the total. Inter- $0.3 million (down 1 percent); ICRAF, $1.1 million (down 5 national organizations and foundations contributed $73 mil- percent); ICRISAT, $1.4 million (down 6 percent); IPGRI, lion or 22 percent (1999: $74 million or 22 percent), and $1.4 million (down 6 percent); ISNAR, $0.7 million, (down developing countries and other donors contributed the 7 percent); IFPRI, $1.8 million (down 8 percent); CIAT, $3.2 remaining $33 million or 10 percent (1999: $30 million or million (down 10 percent); and IITA $3.1 million (down 10 10 percent). percent). 28 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Funding for the four remaining Centers was 10 percent or of 2000 were $203 million (1999: $263 million). The more outside their financing plan targets: IWMI, $1.3 mil- decrease in net assets is primarily explained by the write- lion (down 13 percent); ICLARM, $2.5 million (down 17 down of $74 million in fixed assets following a change in percent); ILRI, $4.9 million (down 17 percent) and accounting policy. Therefore the decrease represents a book WARDA, $3.7 million (down 31 percent). These shortfalls movement. primarily reflect lower-than-expected funding from other Net assets are made up of $62 million (1999: $44 million) CGIAR investors and slower-than-planned project imple- in unappropriated net assets and $141 million (1999: $219 mentation. million) in appropriated net assets. Appropriated net assets can be further subdivided into capital invested in fixed CO-SPONSOR SUPPORT assets ($98 million) and funds set aside by Centers for the The World Bank contributed $45 million to the CGIAR acquisition of fixed assets ($43 million). research program in 2000. Bank support amounted to 14 Cash and cash-equivalent balances equaled $177 million percent of total CGIAR support. In addition, the Bank at the end of 2000 (1999: $212 million). This figure includes funded the annual operating costs of the CGIAR Secretariat $26 million in cash and investments disclosed under long- ($4.25 million) and contributed $0.75 million to TAC. Total term assets. The primary reason for the reduction in year-end support from the Bank, therefore, amounted to $50 million in cash holding was the reduction ($44 million) in donations 2000, the same as in 1999. FAO and UNDP provided $0.6 received in advance. The cash balance of $177 million rep- million and $0.4 million respectively in support of resents 192 days of expenditures. The current ratio is 1.74. TAC/SPIA. They provided $0.2 million and $1.8 million Capital investments totaled $15 million in 2000. At the end respectively directly to Centers. of 2000, 18 percent of the value of 2000 agenda contribu- tions ($61 million), or two months of income, was outstand- FINANCIAL POSITION ing as accounts receivable from Members. The 2000 financial data confirm that the CGIAR as a whole is in a strong financial condition. Total net assets at the end ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 29 Table 1 CGIAR Financial Highlights, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 A. Resource summary (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda Total Agenda Total Total Total Total CGIAR contributions 304 332 320 333 340 330 331 Annual change (percent) 13% 1% 5% 0% 2% (3%) 0% Other revenue 14 13 13 12 14 Finance Committee EC allocation 5 Total revenue 346 346 353 342 350 System expenditure 325 355 333 346 337 349 338 Net surplus/(deficit) (9) 0 16 (7) 12 Agenda funding, percent of total 92% 96% 100% 100% 100% Restricted funding, percent of total 41% 39% 47% 46% 50% Number of contributing CGIAR Members 44 50 54 55 55 B. Expenditure share profile (percent) CGIAR undertakings Increasing productivity 40% 40% 37% 34% 36% Protecting the environment 16% 17% 19% 20% 18% Saving biodiversity 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% Improving policies 12% 11% 12% 13% 14% Strengthening NARS 21% 21% 21% 23% 22% Region Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 38% 40% 40% 42% 42% Asia 33% 31% 32% 32% 32% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 17% 17% 18% 17% 17% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 12% 12% 10% 9% 9% Object Personnel 53% 51% 50% 50% 49% Supplies/services 34% 36% 37% 38% 39% Travel 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Depreciation 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% C. CGIAR staff (number) International staff 897 862 892 907 873 Other staff 9,416 8,295 7,578 7,701 7,642 Total staff 10,313 9,157 8,470 8,608 8,515 D. CGIAR financial indicators Unappropriated net assets (U.S. dollars) 45 43 52 44 62 Unappropriated net assets in Days (revenue) 48 45 54 49 67 Appropriated net assets (U.S. dollars) 277 273 271 219 141 Net fixed assets (U.S. dollars) 231 232 227 174 98 Current ratio 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.7 Memo notes: Centers’ cost deflator (1999=1.00) 0.92 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.00 Note: Excludes a contribution of $5 million from the World Bank to cover the cost of the CGIAR Secretariat and TAC. 30 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Box 1 Annual Financial Decisionmaking Process and Schedule Introduction of Research Agenda (October). The CGIAR’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) introduces the research agenda at the International Centers Week (ICW). Plan- ning, including revision of estimates of resource requirements, thus begins approximately 14 months before the start of activity. Submission of Centers’ Medium-Term Plans (March). Centers prepare and submit three- year, medium-term plans (MTPs). These plans update original proposals, taking into account current activity, changes in the research environment, and subsequent plan mod- ifications (which may be introduced in the third year of the period covered by the plans). Discussion of Proposed Plans (April). The Centers and the TAC discuss the proposed MTPs. Setting of Agenda (May). At the mid-term meeting (MTM), the TAC proposes the next year’s research agenda on the basis of three-year plans presented by the Centers. The CGIAR debates the TAC’s recommendations, taking into consideration advice from the Finance Committee on funding prospects, and endorses the proposed research agenda and financial allocations, with or without modification. Following the MTM, the Members indicate general levels of financing so that the Centers can prepare their financing plans. Preparation of Financing Plans (June–September). Centers prepare their individual financing plans for the following year on the basis of financing information solicited through bilateral contacts with Members. World Bank funding is reflected in the plans on a percentage basis of funding secured by Centers from their Members—11.5 percent in 1999 and 12 percent in 2000. Confirmation of Program Content (mid-September). On the basis of interactions with their Members, Centers determine whether any changes in funding for the research agenda are expected. They communicate these changes and their implications for program con- tent to the TAC and the CGIAR Secretariat. The TAC reviews this content and highlights the need for any significant CGIAR action at ICW. Review of Financing Plans (end of September to beginning of October). Following con- firmation of program content by the TAC, the Finance Committee reviews Center financ- ing plans on the basis of funding information solicited by the CGIAR Secretariat. During this effort, the Committee scrutinizes the consistency and feasibility of the proposed World Bank contribution to each Center’s funds. Approval of Research Agenda and Financing Plans (October). At ICW, the CGIAR reviews and approves the finalized research agenda and Center financing plans for the following year. Implementation of Agenda and Disbursement of Funds (January–December). Centers commence implementation of the research agenda on January 1, and Members disburse funds to the Centers throughout the year. Preparation of Financial Statements (December). At the end of the calendar year, Cen- ters prepare audited financial statements showing the use of the funds received in sup- port of the research agenda ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 31 Box 2 Financial Concepts and Terminology Research Agenda. The research agenda is made up of all the Center activities. One or more Centers may execute these activities jointly with national agricultural research systems (NARS), advanced research institutions, or nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Centers develop the agenda and conduct programs in collaboration with partners. The TAC reviews the agenda and, if appropriate, recommends it for CGIAR financing. Projects included in the agenda should: I Aim to produce research or research-related international public goods (including train- ing) I Be of high priority with regard to accomplishment of the CGIAR’s goals and objectives I Have acceptable probabilities of success, and I Have no alternative producers or sources of supply with suitable costs or reliability. Agenda Financing. The research agenda, as endorsed by the CGIAR, is eligible for financ- ing by Members, including the World Bank. The approved financial requirements are the minimum financial requirements for implementing the agenda. All Centers and partners are encouraged to maximize financing. Mechanisms to ensure that the agenda is fully funded have evolved from unsuccessful attempts to “guarantee� full financing through the sole use of World Bank funds. Members, instead of the World Bank alone, now act collectively to fill any financial gaps that might arise in the course of the year. Financing Modalities. Centers are primarily financed through annual support from CGIAR Members. Modest amounts are also available from Centers’ annual miscellaneous income, including ad hoc contributions from organizations that are not CGIAR Members. Member financing may be unrestricted and directed to the CGIAR with flexibility regarding allocation based on CGIAR priorities; or to Centers, or to programs. Alternatively, Member financing may be restricted and directed to a specific Center program, project, subproject, or activity as defined in a contractual agreement. All Members are expected to help pay the full cost of Center operations, including admin- istrative costs, of which they must bear a proportionate share. World Bank financing always is made available as general CGIAR support. All Members are encouraged to provide their support in a similar manner. Members usually disburse funds directly to Centers throughout the year. The CGIAR Secretariat provides disbursement services, through the World Bank, to Members that prefer to make an annual disbursement. CGIAR Agenda Matrix. The distribution of financial resources is presented as the CGIAR research agenda matrix. Activities are divided into five groups representing the principal undertakings and outputs of the CGIAR. The matrix reflects the full allocation of Center proj- ect costs among the CGIAR activities. Projects are the basic units of activity. Approximately 250 projects were ongoing in 2000. The CGIAR has identified and implemented several sys- temwide programs to respond to specific challenges and strengthen collaboration among Centers and with partners. Implementation. Centers implement the research agenda in partnership with advanced insti- tutions, NGOs, and NARS. These joint ventures might involve shared tasks at different points on the research and development continuum, from laboratory-based research to field-level experimentation. Funding of such ventures is included in financing for the CGIAR research agenda. 32 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 2000 CGIAR Funding CGIAR CONTRIBUTIONS million for 2000. The CGIAR emphasized that the $340 mil- In the year 2000 CGIAR Members contributed $331 million lion was not a ceiling and encouraged Members to allocate in support of the research agenda (see box 2 on page 32). additional support if possible. On the other hand, it urged This figure represents a decrease of $9 million (3 percent) Centers to exercise caution in spending, and to plan on the from the approved financing plan target of $340 million. It basis of identified funding. also represents an increase of $1 million (0.3 percent) from By the MTM in May 2000, updates from Centers indicated actual support of $330 million in 1999. that funding for the research agenda, at the aggregate level, Figure 1 shows CGIAR funding from 1996 to 2000. Annex would be at about $352 million. However, the financing plan 2 presents details of Members’ support as well as individual was maintained at the $340 million level because of con- receipts by Center. Annex table A2.1 ranks CGIAR contribu- cerns about funding risks arising from weak European cur- tions by Member to the research agenda for the period from rencies. 1997 to 2000. Annex table A2.2 presents 2000 CGIAR fund- At ICW99, the Centers reconfirmed that aggregate funding ing by Member (both unrestricted support and restricted sup- would be in the $340 million range. Funding from individual port). Annex table A2.3 presents the amount of funds pro- Members continued to be in line with earlier expectations. vided by each Member to each Center in support of their However, weaker European currencies reduced the dollar approved programs. value of contributions; consequently the actual 2000 results were likely to be in the range of $330 million to $335 million. EVOLUTION OF 2000 At the Center level, 14 Centers were expecting to receive SUPPORT TO THE APPROVED funding equaling or exceeding that specified in their financ- RESEARCH AGENDA ing plans. Two Centers—ISNAR and ILRI—were projecting At the ICW in October 1999, the Finance Committee recom- funding to be 12 percent and 5 percent, respectively, less than mended, and the CGIAR approved, a financing plan of $340 that specified in their approved financing plans. It was noted Figure 1 CGIAR funding, 1996–2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 350 Total 300 Research agenda 250 200 150 100 50 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 33 that disbursements by Members were running behind sched- CONTRIBUTION PROFILE ule. The Finance Committee and the group of Centers urged Total CGIAR Membership was 58, of which in 2000 the num- Members to accelerate disbursements of funds to Centers. ber of contributing CGIAR Members remained at 55. Uganda was a new contributor in 2000. The average contribution for OVERALL FINANCIAL OUTCOME the CGIAR Membership as a whole remained constant at $6 Member funding of $331 million, Center-generated income of million. $14 million, and extraordinary funding of $5 million totaled The 58 Members can be divided into four groups: indus- $350 million in funding to Centers. Total expenditures in trialized countries (21), developing countries (22), founda- 2000, including expenditures on CGIAR Committees but tions (3), and international and regional organizations (12). excluding CGIAR Secretariat and TAC expenditures, were For analytical purposes, industrialized countries can be fur- $338 million. Therefore, the operating surplus for Centers as ther subdivided along geographical lines into three sub- a whole was $12 million. This surplus, however, incorporates groups: Europe, North America, and the Pacific Rim. Trends a transfer of $2 million from CGIAR systemwide reserves and associated with any of the groups should not be interpreted an advance of $3 million on 2001 income. By comparison, the as policy decisions by the groups, because contributions to CGIAR had an operating deficit of $7 million in 1999. the CGIAR are voluntary, and each Member decides the In 2000, 14 Centers had operating surpluses: IRRI ($2.7 amount and recipients of its contributions. million), ICLARM ($2.4 million), IPGRI ($1.9 million), Figure 2 compares the composition of funding for 2000 ICRAF ($1.6 million), CIAT ($1.2 million), IFPRI ($1.1 mil- with that for 1999. Figure 3 presents the composition of fund- lion), CIP ($0.9 million), ISNAR ($0.8 million), IWMI ($0.3 ing by Center and Member group in 2000. million), ICARDA ($0.3 million), ICRISAT ($0.2 million), Overall funding rose by $1 million (0.3 percent) from CIFOR ($0.2 million), CIMMYT ($0.2 million), and IITA 1999. The $1 million funding increase comprises $2.5 mil- ($0.2 million). lion from Europe, $1.8 million from North America, and $4.2 Two Centers had operating deficits: ILRI ($1.6 million) million from other donors, which were offset in part by and WARDA ($0.6 million). The ILRI deficit represents the decreases of $4.9 million from the Pacific Rim, $1.4 million reversal of a 1999 surplus that had resulted from a 1999 from international and regional organizations, and $1 million special allocation ($1.5 million) from the Finance Commit- from developing countries. tee. This surplus, received and unspent in 1999, was Europe’s share of contributions—$128 million—remained expensed in 2000. constant at 39 percent of total funding in 2000. Contributions Figure 2 Agenda contributions by Member group, 1999–2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 350 300 International and regional International and regional organizations organizations Developing countries Developing countries 250 Pacific Rim Pacific Rim 200 Non-CGIAR Non-CGIAR North America North America 150 Foundations Foundations 100 Europe Europe 50 0 1999 2000 34 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH were higher in national currency terms, in the aggregate, as lion and $0.5 million, respectively—increased by 0.4 mil- the European Commission resumed its funding. However, lion and $0.1 million respectively from 1999. these increases did not result in higher dollar contributions Following the pattern of the last several years, developing because of the devaluation of the euro against the dollar dur- countries together accounted for 4 percent of Member con- ing 2000. tributions. Total contributions from these countries Within the European group there was a large increase in decreased from $14.7 million (4.3 percent) in 1999 to European Commission funding ($16.3 million) over 1999. $13.7 million (4.1 percent) in 2000, a decrease of $1 mil- Other increases were received from the Netherlands ($2.1 lion (6 percent). Colombia maintained its position as the million) and from the United Kingdom ($1 million). These largest contributor among the developing countries for the increases were offset in part by decreases from Germany fifth year in a row with its contribution in 2000 of $2.3 mil- ($5.3 million), Switzerland ($4.5 million), Denmark ($3 mil- lion. Uganda made a first-time contribution of $0.3 million. lion), Belgium ($2.1 million), and Sweden ($0.9 million). Mexico maintained its support at $1.8 million, and Nigeria Many of the decreases in European Member funding reflect contributed $1 million, down from $1.6 million in 1999. not only large exchange losses but also the timing of the flow China increased its support from $0.7 million to $1 million, of funds for restricted projects. The decrease in funding from and South Africa increased its support by $0.1 million to Germany reflects a reduction of 50 percent of unrestricted $0.6 million. funding ($3 million) from that country. Contributions from international organizations decreased North America’s contributions increased marginally by by $1.4 million to $66.3 million. Decreases in funding were $1.8 million to $53.5 million, and its share of total contribu- received from the International Fund for Agricultural tions remained at 16 percent. Development (IFAD) (down $1.1 million), African Devel- The decrease in contributions from the Pacific Rim, down opment Bank (AFDB) (down $1.1 million), International from $48 million in 1999 to $44 million in 2000, reflects a Development Research Centre (IDRC) (down $0.7 million), decrease of $5 million from Japan and a small increase of the Arab Fund (down $0.2 million), and the United Nations $0.5 million from Australia and New Zealand. The fall in Development Programme (UNDP) (down $0.3 million). Japan’s contribution resulted from a reduction in funding of These decreases were offset in part by an increase in fund- 3 percent ($1 million) and an exchange loss ($4 million) fol- ing from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) (up $1.6 mil- lowing the devaluation of the yen against the U.S. dollar. lion). Among international organizations the World Bank Contributions from Australia and New Zealand—$8.5 mil- remained the largest investor in the CGIAR, at $45 million. Figure 3 Contributions by Center and Member group, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 Non-CGIAR 25 Foundations 20 International and regional organizations 15 Developing countries 10 Pacific Rim North America 5 Europe 0 CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 35 Table 2 Contributions by Other Donors, 1999 and 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1999 2000 CGIAR Members Multidonor projects 3.7 4.7 Non-CGIAR Members Foundations 3.0 4.4 Non-Member developing countries 2.2 2.7 Private sector 1.3 2.1 Common fund for commodities 1.3 1.0 NGOs/UN organizations 1.0 1.3 Other miscellaneous 2.5 3.0 Subtotal 11.3 14.5 Total 15.0 19.2 Note: “Other� includes miscellaneous funding from a wide variety of sources. With contributions of $6 million and $5.8 respectively, the Private sector contributions primarily include contribu- ADB and the IFAD were the second and third largest tions, for collaborative work, from Latin American agricul- investors in this category. With the exception of contributions tural producers. from the World Bank, all contributions from international Other miscellaneous contributions include contributions organizations are restricted. The year-to-year funding fluctu- from a wide variety of organizations, including the Interna- ations reflect changing start and finish dates for restricted tional Tropical Timber Organization, the International Insti- projects. tute of Biological Control, and the European Environmental Contributions from other donors increased by $4.2 million, Agency. from $15 million in 1999 to $19.2 million in 2000, and now In 2000, 75 percent of the CGIAR’s total funding was make up 5.8 percent of the total funding. Table 2 indicates again provided by the top 13 contributors to the CGIAR. the contributions of these donors in 1999 and 2000. These same 13 Members also contributed 92 percent of the Multidonor projects are multiyear projects funded by a CGIAR total unrestricted funding. Figure 4 illustrates the number of donors, all of whom are Members of the CGIAR. level of their support. The resumption of EC funding brought Contributions from individual donors cannot be separately the EC back into the top 13. Figure 5 illustrates support by identified in any given year. These contributions account for these top 13 contributors as a percentage of Center total almost 25 percent of the increase ($1 million) of $4.2 million funding. in funding from other donors. Contributions from foundations include contributions from DISBURSEMENTS Nippon, Novartis, Sasakawa, Neys-van Hoogs, Gatsby, The pace of disbursement continues to present a challenge to Hilton, and the MacArthur Foundation. the Centers’ cash flow. Figure 6 compares Member disburse- Non-Member country contributions include contributions ments in 1999 and 2000 with a normative pattern of monthly from Bolivia, Honduras, Malawi, Mozambique, Turkey, expenditures. By the end of 2000, only 82 percent of funds Nicaragua, Ethiopia, Eritrea, and the Republic of Yemen. had been disbursed, compared with 89 percent in 1999. Dol- They are largely funded by loans or credits, or both, from the lar receipts decreased from $293 million in 1999 to $271 World Bank. million in 2000 as more than $60 million was unpaid as of 36 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 4 Top 13 contributors, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars Norway Australia Sweden Germany Denmark Canada Netherlands United Kingdom Switzerland European Commission Japan United States World Bank 0 10 20 30 40 50 Figure 5 Center support by top 13 contributors, 2000 Percentages 100 80 60 40 20 Restricted Unrestricted 0 R P RI I I I R I AT CI CIFO MM YT CI DA RM RAF ISAT IFP IITA ILR PGR IRR NA IWM ARD A AR CLA IC ICR I IS CI IC I W ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 37 Figure 6 Disbursement of funds, 2000 Cumulative percentages 100% Normative levels 90% 1999 actual levels 80% 2000 actual levels 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% January March May July September November Figure 7 Funding by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 I AT I RI DA RI P R I R A MY T IRR CI IITA ILR AT RAF IFP CI FO LARM IWM SNA ARD IM IPG CAR CRIS IC CI I C I I IC W 38 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH December 31, 2000. At year-end, therefore, Centers were Members make only one transfer to the World Bank account “owed� more than $60 million by CGIAR Members. instead of as many as 16 to various Centers’ bank accounts. The primary reasons for continuation in 2000 of the poor Beginning in 2000, Centers enter into formal contractual disbursement situation were increasing delays in the timing agreements with the World Bank concerning the use of the of disbursements by some of the major contributors and the funds disbursed. This is to ensure full accountability. Annex funding on a reimbursable basis of some targeted grants (as table A2.4b illustrates Member disbursements through the targeted funding increases as a percentage of total funding, World Bank in 1999 and 2000. the associated disbursement of funds will decelerate). In addition to Member contributions, the Secretariat also The third quarter of the year continues to be a time when manages the disbursement of the World Bank’s contributions. cash flow problems are most acute. In this quarter Centers are forced to call on their reserves to cover almost 40 percent of CENTER PERSPECTIVE their annual expenditures. Annex tables A2.4a and A2.4b Figure 7 illustrates the distribution of funding by Center, in detail the disbursements in 2000. 2000. In that year CIMMYT was the recipient of the largest CGIAR Members have the option to disburse their contri- amount of funding; followed by IRRI. Each of these Centers butions either directly to the Centers or through the Secre- had funding in excess of $30 million. With $8.5 million, tariat using the World Bank’s payment system. In 2000 WARDA was the recipient of the smallest amount of agenda approximately $70 million (21 percent of total contributions) funding. was disbursed through the World Bank’s payment system. In Funding for four Centers was at or above levels approved at the last few years, the number of Members using this system ICW99: CIMMYT, $4.9 million (up 15 percent); IRRI, $3.8 has more than doubled from 6 to 14, as has the amount dis- , million (up 13 percent); CIP $2.5 million (up 14 percent); bursed (from $24 million in 1994 to $70 million in 2000), and CIFOR, $0.2 million (up 2 percent). excluding the disbursement of the World Bank contribution. Funding for eight Centers was within 10 percent of, and thus The main advantage to Members of using the Bank’s payment broadly in line with, financing plan targets: ICARDA, $0.3 mil- system is a reduction in the number of financial transactions: lion (down 1 percent); ICRAF, $1.1 million (down 5 percent); Figure 8 Funding outcomes vs. financing plans, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 I P R A R F I RI RI I MY T IRR CI T FO ARD SNA ICRA IWM RISA IPG IFP RM IITA CI AT RDA ILR IM CI IC I IC IC LA W A C ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 39 Figure 9 Changes in Center funding, 1999–2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 1999 2000 0 AT R T CI P A F T RI IITA ILR I RI IRR I AR MI DA CI CIFO MMY RD ARM CRA RISA IFP IPG IW WAR I ICA ICL I IC ISN C Figure 10 Agenda funding by funding type, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 Restricted 5 Unrestricted 0 P RI I RI I R I AT IFOR MYT CI DA RM RAF ISAT IFP IITA ILR IRR SNA IWM ARD A CI C M AR CLA IC ICR IPG I CI IC I W 40 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ICRISAT, $1.4 million (down 6 percent); IPGRI, $1.4 million RESTRICTED SUPPORT (down 6 percent); ISNAR, $0.7 million, (down 7 percent); There are two types of restricted support. The first is IFPRI, $1.8 million (down 8 percent); CIAT, $3.2 million restricted support by attribution, which refers to funds for a (down 10 percent); and IITA $3.1 million (down 10 percent). program or region. Use of these funds within a program or Funding for the four remaining Centers was 10 percent or region is unconstrained, but Centers are required to docu- more outside their financing plan targets: IWMI, $1.3 million ment their allocation. France, the United Kingdom, and the (down 13 percent); ICLARM, $2.5 million (down 17 per- EC have given restricted support by attribution. cent); ILRI, $4.9 million (down 17 percent), and WARDA, The second type of restricted support is restricted support $3.7 million (down 31 percent). These shortfalls primarily by contract, which refers to funds that must be expended in reflect lower-than-expected funding from other CGIAR accordance with a contract between a Member and the Cen- investors and slower-than-planned project implementation. ter implementing the project, subproject, or activity. Funds Figure 8 compares the actual funding received by Centers for each line item in the budget are specified. Any realloca- with their approved funding plans, revealing excesses and tion of funds within the budget generally requires the prior shortfalls. consent of the Member. Accountability is detailed in the con- As figure 9 shows, 11 of the Centers received greater fund- tract, which often requires financial audits on a periodic ing in 2000 than in 1999: CIMMYT, $4.1 million (up 12 per- (annual) or end-of-project basis. Some Members’ support is cent); ICARDA, $3.1 million (up 16 percent); IPGRI, $2.7 restricted support by contract. million (up 13 percent); IRRI, $1.3 million (up 4 percent; In 2000, unrestricted support was 50 percent ($164 mil- CIAT, $1.0 million (up 3 percent); CIFOR, $0.9 million (up lion) of total support, down from 54 percent in 1999 (see fig- 8 percent); ICRAF, $0.9 million (up 4 percent); ICRISAT, ure 10). Restricted support (by attribution and by contract) $0.7 million (up 4 percent); IFPRI, $0.7 million (up 3 per- was 50 percent of total support, up from 46 percent in 1999. cent); ISNAR, $0.6 million (up 7 percent); and CIP $0.5 mil- , In absolute terms, this support was $167 million ($15 million lion (up 2 percent). IWMI funding remained constant at $8.8 more than in 1999). million. Four Centers received less funding than that received in CO-SPONSOR SUPPORT 1999: IITA, $1.3 million (down 4 percent); ICLARM, $1.9 The World Bank contributed $45 million to the CGIAR million (down 14 percent); WARDA, $2.3 million (down 21 research agenda in 2000. Bank support amounted to 14 per- percent); and ILRI, $3.5 million (down 13 percent). cent of total CGIAR research support. In addition, the Bank Annex table A2.5 details 2000 funding by Center. Annex funded the annual operating costs of the CGIAR Secretariat table A2.6 presents 2000 funding outcomes by Center. Annex ($4.25 million) and contributed $0.75 million to TAC. The table A2.7 shows CGIAR System grants by Center from 1996 Bank’s total support, therefore, amounted to $50 million in to 2000. 2000, the same as in 1999. FAO provided $0.6 million in support of TAC/SPIA and $0.2 million directly to Centers. FUNDING MODALITIES UNDP provided $0.4 million in support of TAC/SPIA and Analysis of categories and types of funding provides another $1.8 million directly to Centers. perspective on the challenges faced by Centers in undertak- ing the approved agenda (see Financing Modalities in box 2 WORLD BANK SUPPORT on page 32). Following the procedure established at ICW98, the Finance Depending on the degree of flexibility in its use, CGIAR Committee allocated the Bank’s 2000 contribution at a 12 funding has been traditionally divided into two broad cate- percent matching rate and authorized its disbursement. The gories: unrestricted support and restricted support, which is first tranche of $33.45 million representing 90 percent of the targeted to a specific program, project, subproject, or activity. total matching allocation of $37.25 million, was disbursed to Centers in January 2000. The second tranche of $3.8 million UNRESTRICTED SUPPORT was disbursed to Centers in June. Unrestricted support refers to unrestricted funds to support The amount of $3.3 million was allocated to Centers for the Center as a whole. World Bank contributions are the best systemwide programs as follows: ICRAF ($0.6 million, ASB), example of this type of funding because, within the research IITA ($0.3 million, IPM), IPGRI ($0.6 million, SGRP), CIM- agenda, allocation of the contribution is totally uncon- MYT ($0.25 million, tropical maize station), ICARDA ($1 strained. Centers can allocate unrestricted funds to any pro- million, Central Asia program), IFPRI/ISNAR, ($0.3 million, gram or cost within the research agenda on the basis of insti- indicators project), and IFPRI ($0.25 million, SPIA/TAC tutional needs and priorities. poverty project). In addition, other allocation to Centers in ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 41 Figure 11 Distribution of World Bank support, 2000 5 20% 4 15% 3 10% 2 5% 1 percentage 0 0% millions of U.S. dollars AT OR YT CIP RDA ARM RAF ISAT IFPR I IITA I LR I RI I R I IR R N A IW M R D A C I C IF M M A CL I C IC R IP G IS A CI IC I W the amount of $0.8 million included $0.5 million to CIP (downsizing program), and $0.25 to CIMMYT (rice/wheat facilitation unit). The Finance Committee also allocated $0.75 million to support CGIAR Committees. At the MTM the Finance Committee allocated the remain- ing $3 million of the 2000 contribution, together with an additional $5 million, to Centers to better enable them to cope with the 1999 EC default. The additional $5 million was funded with an advance of $3 million from the 2001 World Bank allocation and a drawdown of $2 million from CGIAR reserves. Table 3 represents the total allocation of World Bank funding in 2000. For 1998–2000, the initial allocation of World Bank match- ing funds was 11 percent. For 1999 the Finance Committee increased this percentage to 11.5 percent. For 2000, match- ing was increased to 12 percent. Figure 11 illustrates the actual distribution of total 2000 World Bank support and the percentage of total agenda Center funding that it represented in 2000. In 2000, all 16 Centers received Bank support, ranging from 11 percent to 17 percent of total agenda contri- butions. Annex table A2.8 presents data on Bank support for the period from 1996 to 2000. CGIAR reserves at the beginning of 2000 were $4.5 mil- lion. During the year, $2 million were used as part of the EC rescue package. 42 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Table 3 Allocation of World Bank Funding, 1999–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) World Bank Funding 1999 2000 Matching funds 12 percent 34.6 37.3 Systemwide programs 4.0 3.3 Support to CGIAR strategic initiatives 1.5 0.0 Other Center allocations 3.5 3.8 Support to CGIAR committees/reserves 1.5 0.7 TOTAL 45.0 45.0 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 43 Agenda Resources pending on agenda programs in 2000 amounted to $57.9 million. Crops accounted for 71 percent of invest- S $338 million, a decrease of $9 million or 3 percent over spending in 1999 ($347 million). Four Centers (CIFOR, ICRISAT, ILRI, and IWMI) had expendi- tures in line with 1999. The agenda expenditures of another four Centers were higher in 2000 than in 1999. These Cen- ments, livestock for 13 percent, forestry for 12 percent, and fisheries for 4 percent. Investments in efforts to protect the environment (see fig- ure 12c) decreased in dollar terms (from $67.9 million to $60.4 million) and percentage terms (from 20 percent to 18 ters were CIMMYT ($1.6 million, up 4 percent), IFPRI ($1.1 percent). million, up 5 percent), IPGRI ($1.1 million, up 5 percent), Investments in efforts to save biodiversity (see figure 12d) and ICARDA ($0.6 million, up 3 percent). decreased in dollar terms (from $36.2 million to $34.8 mil- Expenditures at eight Centers were lower in 2000 than in lion) but remained the same in percentage terms at 10 per- 1999. The Centers with the most significant decreases in cent. agenda expenditures were IITA ($2.6 million, down 8 per- Investments in improvement of policies (see figure 12e) cent), IRRI ($2.5 million, down 7 per cent), ICLARM ($2.0 increased in dollar terms (from $46.8 million to $48 million) million, down 16 percent), ISNAR ($1.5 million, down 16 and percentage terms (from 13 percent to 14 percent). percent), WARDA ($1.5 million, down 14 percent), CIP Investments in efforts to strengthen NARS (see figure 12f) ($1.4 million, down 7 percent), CIAT ($1.2 million, down 4 decreased in dollar terms (from $78.6 million to $74.6 mil- percent) and ICRAF ($1.1 million, down 5 percent). In most lion) and percentage terms (from 23 percent to 22 percent). of the cases in which expenditures were lower it was because Distribution of these investments among training, organiza- of the successful completion of some restricted funded proj- tion and management counseling, and other programs ects and delays in starting new projects. changed little from previous years. ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES BY REGION The allocation of resources is reviewed below from the per- Figure 13 presents the 2000 allocation of CGIAR resources spective of undertaking, region, and object of expenditure. by developing regions. Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa Annex 3 presents expenditure data. Annex table A3.1 pro- remained at 42 percent ($140 million) of total investment in vides data on investments by Center from 1996 to 2000. A 2000. Investment in Asia remained at 32 percent ($110 mil- new classification scheme based on an overall CGIAR logi- lion). Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean cal framework has been introduced in 2000. This scheme decreased from 18 percent to 17 percent ($56 million), and will replace the current classification by undertaking with investment in West Asia and North Africa decreased from 10 outputs. percent to 9 percent ($31 million). All Centers invested in programs for Sub-Saharan Africa in BY UNDERTAKING 2000. Seven Centers—IITA, ILRI, ICRAF, CIMMYT, Figure 12a illustrates investments in the year 2000 in the WARDA, IFPRI, and ICRISAT—accounted for more than 75 CGIAR’s five principal undertakings: increasing productiv- percent of allocations to this region. The pattern was similar ity, protecting the environment, saving biodiversity, improv- in Asia. A majority of the Centers invested in programs for ing policies, and strengthening NARS. Annex table A3.2 pro- Asia. Four Centers—IRRI, ICRISAT, CIMMYT, and CIP— vides details for the 1996–2000 period. accounted for the majority of allocations to this region. About Investments in the five CGIAR undertakings by Center are half of the allocations for WANA continued to be made by presented in figures 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, and 12f. Annex ICARDA. CIAT accounted for more than one-third of the table A3.3 provides details. allocations made in Latin America and the Caribbean. Efforts to increase productivity continued to be the major thrust of CGIAR activities (see figure 12b). Investments in BY OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE these efforts totaled $120 million (36 percent of total invest- The trend of reduced personnel spending continued in 2000. ment), up from $117 million (34 percent of total investment) As figure 14 indicates, personnel costs amounted to 49 per- in 1999. Among productivity investments, investments in cent of total 2000 costs, a decrease of only 1 percent from germplasm enhancement increased marginally (from $61.2 1999 but a significant decrease from the mid-1990s, when million to $61.8). Investments in production systems devel- personnel expenditures accounted for 55 percent of total opment and management increased from $56.1 million to annual costs. From 1999 to 2000, expenditures on supplies 44 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 12a Investments in CGIAR undertakings, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 36% 120 30% 100 24% 80 18% 60 12% 40 6% 20 0% 0 Increasing Protecting the Saving Improving Strengthening productivity environment biodiversity policies NARS and services increased from 38 percent to 39 percent of total increase index in dollar terms can be established with data expenditures. Travel and depreciation expenditures on the proportion of expenditures in various currencies and remained constant at 7 percent and 5 percent, respectively. data on the annual exchange rates of currencies reported by In absolute terms, supply and service expenditures remained the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In 2000, the loss of at $133 million, personnel expenditures decreased by $9 Centers’ purchasing power was 0.3 percent, compared with million (5 percent), depreciation expenditures decreased by 0.2 percent in 1999. Annex table A3.7 presents data on the $2 million (10 percent), and travel expenditures increased Centers’ inflation rates from 1996 to 2000. marginally by $1 million to $25 million. Annex table A3.5 provides detailed Center-level information on object expen- CGIAR INVESTMENTS OVER 29 YEARS ditures. Annex table A3.6 presents data on CGIAR staffing To analyze CGIAR activity from the perspective of the from 1996 to 2000. record of expenditures (investment), the CGIAR Secretariat organized all available Center data on resource use from COST CHANGES 1972 to 2000. Annex table A5.1 summarizes all CGIAR The costs at Centers are affected by both inflation and fluc- investments. The table shows investments in five-year peri- tuations in currency values—the relationship between the ods and for 1997 to 2000 by Center, undertaking, commod- exchange rates of expenditure currencies and the U.S. dol- ity group and production sector, region, and object of lar, the CGIAR’s unit of account. An aggregate CGIAR cost expenditure. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 45 Figure 12b Center investments in increasing productivity Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 16 14% 14 12% 12 10% 10 8% 8 6% 6 4% 4 2% 2 0 0% IITA MYT IRR I ILR I AT CI P T A F M RI OR RDA IFPRI NAR MI CI ISA RD ICRA LAR IPG CIF IW CI M ICR ICA IC W A IS Figure 12c Center investments in protecting the environment Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 8 14% 7 12% 6 10% 5 8% 4 6% 3 4% 2 1 2% 0 0% I I A I T RI RI MY T IRR AT ILR ARD RA F IITA IFOR WM RISA ARM A IFP ARD IPG CI P AR IM CI IC C I IC L ISN C IC IC W 46 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 12d Center investments in saving biodiversity Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 8 25% 7 20% 6 5 15% 4 10% 3 2 5% 1 0 0% RI YT AT DA P CI ISAT IRR I R ILR I IITA F A RM RI R I IPG IMM CI AR R CI FO RA RD IC WA ICLA IFP ISNA IWM C IC IC Figure 12e Center investments in improving policies Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 15 30% 25% 12 20% 9 15% 6 10% 3 5% 0 0% RI I F T I I IRR CRA ISA IWM IPGR IFO R IITA ILR I P R CI CIAT MYT RDA ARM NA RDA IFP IS WA I IC R C CIM ICA ICL ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 47 Figure 12f Center investments in strengthening NARS Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 12 16% 14% 10 12% 8 10% 6 8% 6% 4 4% 2 2% 0 0% YT AR IITA IRR I RI F RI AT ISAT ILR I P A I CI RDA RD WM ARM IFO R IFP ICRA IPG CI MM ISN IC R IC A A I IC L C CI W 48 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 13 CGIAR allocations by developing region, 2000 Percentage of total West Asia and North Africa 9% Latin America and the Caribbean 17% Sub-Saharan Africa 42% Asia 32% Figure 14 CGIAR expenditure by object, 2000 Percentage of total Supplies and services 39% Personnel 49% Depreciation 5% Travel 7% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 49 Financial Position he aggregation of 1996–2000 Center data, shown The first accounting change, introduced in 1999, concerns T in table 4 and elaborated below, reflects the finan- cial position of the CGIAR System. Annex table A4.1 provides details by Center. The 2000 financial data confirm that the CGIAR as a whole is in a strong financial condition. Total net assets at the accounting for land and buildings, which revert to the host government of a Center should a Center cease operations. The new policy states that land and buildings do not have a residual value and should be written out of a Center’s books of account. Centers will no longer annually depreciate such end of 2000 were $203 million (1999: $263 million). These land and buildings but will instead carry them in their bal- assets are made up of $62 million (1999: $44 million) in ance sheets at a fully written-down value of zero. As a result, unappropriated net assets and $141 million (1999: $219 Centers’ annual depreciation charges and total net assets will million) in appropriated net assets. Cash and cash-equiva- decrease. The new policy, which was implemented by some lent balances totaled $177 million at the end of 2000 (1999: Centers (ICARDA, ICLARM, and ICRISAT) in 1999, was $212 million). This figure includes $26 million in cash and implemented by most of the remaining Centers during 2000. investments disclosed under long-term assets. The net effect of the policy in 2000 was to reduce invest- ments in fixed assets (and, by implication, in net assets) by NET ASSETS $75 million. Net assets are the residual interest in an entity’s assets after The second accounting change was to reclassify net assets liabilities have been deducted. Hence, net assets in not-for- as either unappropriated (broadly corresponding to the ear- profit organizations are equivalent to “shareholder equity� in lier term “operating funds�) or appropriated (broadly corre- for-profit organizations. The CGIAR introduced two changes sponding to the earlier term “capital invested in fixed assets in accounting for net assets during 1999/2000. plus capital funds�). This change was initiated to bring Figure 15 Net assets by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 I I T T T F I R I P I R A ILR IRR ISA IITA MY CIA RA RDA IFPR IFO PGR CI WM LARM NA RD R M IC CA C I I IS WA IC CI I IC 50 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 16 Unappropriated net assets by Center, 2000 In revenue days 150 120 90 60 30 0 -30 -60 R I I I RI I P A R M A R C IF O I W M R IS A T IR R IITA PGR IF P IL R CI F T T R A M Y A R D IS N A C IA A R D A L I IC M IC IC IC CI W Figure 17 Net fixed assets by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 20 15 10 5 0 IL R I T T AT IR R I RA F IITA RDA CI P D A IF O R G R I MI RI AR RM M Y R IS A CI IC A AR C IP IW IF P IS N IC L A C IM IC IC W ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 51 Table 4 CGIAR System Financial Position, 1996–2000 (thousands of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 174,391 146,767 171,110 212,347 151,327 Accounts receivable: Donors 46,060 72,261 65,965 54,062 60,823 Employees 2,339 2,662 2,699 2,591 3,499 Others 16,293 13,506 13,154 12,656 13,576 Inventories 9,224 8,811 7,257 6,653 6,506 Pre-paid expenses 4,180 3,811 2,786 3,398 3,069 Other current assets 5,342 2,988 3,247 4,549 5,248 Total current assets 257,829 250,806 266,218 296,256 244,048 Fixed assets Property, plant, and equipment 448,840 467,865 475,861 399,398 289,339 Less: Accumulated depreciation 217,119 237,148 248,819 225,702 191,265 Total fixed assets (net) 231,721 230,717 227,042 173,696 98,074 Other assets 25,728 Total assets 489,550 481,523 493,260 469,952 367,850 Liabilities Current liabilities Bank indebtedness 1,280 928 1,444 3,649 204 Accounts payable: Donors 66,376 72,194 67,200 100,576 56,658 Employees 21,547 4,673 8,971 9,876 5,369 Others 28,441 24,208 17,824 21,871 25,966 In-trust accounts 5,448 1,107 1,732 3,457 3,634 Accruals and provisions 42,689 43,863 50,054 43,855 48,259 Total current liabilities 166,249 146,973 147,225 183,284 140,090 Long-term liabilities Long-term loan 811 1,617 190 0 0 Other 554 17,064 22,915 23,453 24,899 Total long-term liabilities 1,365 18,681 23,105 23,453 24,899 Total liabilities 167,614 165,654 170,330 206,737 164,989 Total assets less total liabilities 321,936 315,869 322,930 263,215 202,861 Net Assets Unappropriated 44,983 43,070 51,522 43,966 61,802 Appropriated 276,953 272,799 271,408 219,249 141,059 Total net assets 321,936 315,869 322,930 263,215 202,861 Note: The decrease in net assets in 2000 is primarily explained by the write-down of $75 million of fixed assets following a change in accounting policy. The decrease represents a book movement. 52 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CGIAR accounting policies fully into compliance with gener- , In 2000 CIAT, CIFOR, CIP IFPRI, IWMI, IITA, IRRI, ally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for not-for-profit IPGRI, ISNAR and WARDA introduced the new accounting organizations. More details can be found in the CGIAR policy for depreciation on land and buildings. The net result Financial Guideline Series No. 2: CGIAR Accounting Policies was a reduction ($75.2 million) in the net fixed assets of and Reporting Practices Manual. CIAT (down $7.8 million); CIFOR (no change); CIP (down Following the change in accounting for land and buildings, $6.9 million); IFPRI (no change); IWMI (no change); IITA aggregate net assets fell by $60.3 million—from $263.2 mil- (down $22.7 million); IRRI (down $26.4 million); IPGRI (no lion in 1999 to $202.9 million in 2000. The level of these change); ISNAR (no change); and WARDA (down $11.4 mil- assets for each Center is shown in figure 15. Unappropriated lion). net assets increased by $17.8 million in 2000, from $44 mil- lion in 1999 to $61.8 million. Appropriated net assets fell by CAPITAL PURCHASE FUND $78.1 million in 2000, from $219.2 million to $141.1 million. The remaining $43 million set aside for fixed asset acquisi- tion (formerly called the “capital fund�), is slightly less than UNAPPROPRIATED NET ASSETS the amount set aside in 1999: $45 million. The decrease is Unappropriated net assets (formerly “the operating fund�) largely accounted for by the redesignation of $5 million from are equivalent to “retained earnings� in a business enter- the capital fund as unappropriated net assets, offset by the prise. In a not-for-profit context, unappropriated net assets excess of the annual depreciation charge for the System as a indicate the financial capacity of an organization to adjust to whole over capital purchases. This part of the fund is estab- unplanned changes in revenue. lished primarily by the setting aside of funds equal to the At the System level, unappropriated net assets rose by value of the depreciation charge (so-called funding depreci- $17.8 million, from $44 million in 1999 to $61.8 million in ation). Figure 18 shows the appropriated net assets funds set 2000. When expressed as revenue and revenue days, this aside for capital purchase, by Center. With the exception of increase represents an increase from 46 days in 1999 to 67 WARDA and CIMMYT, all Centers had balances at the end days in 2000. This increase is due to two factors. First, the of 2000. aggregate statement of activity for the System as a whole The CGIAR Secretariat and Center financial staff continue resulted in an operating surplus of $12 million for 2000; to monitor the acquisition rate of assets, including any long- included in this surplus is a net transfer of $2 million from term major infrastructure investments, and the availability of system reserves and an advance of $3 million of 2001 income resources. If it becomes apparent that the useful life of fixed for EC relief; second, some Centers reclassified $5 million assets is longer than previously thought, assumed asset lives from the former capital fund as unappropriated. As figure 16 conceivably could be increased sufficiently to reduce depre- indicates, the majority of Centers continued to have unappro- ciation costs, with no ill effects on Center operations. priated net asset days above the CGIAR’s average of 67 days. Only one Center, WARDA, had a negative balance at the end LIQUIDITY of 2000 due to accumulated deficits from earlier years. Liquidity represents an organization’s ability to meet its short-term spending requirements. Two primary indicators of APPROPRIATED NET ASSETS liquidity are “current ratio� and “working capital.� Current Appropriated net assets fell by $78 million, from $219 mil- ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities, repre- lion in 1999 to $141 million in 2000. They comprised $98 sented as a fraction. This liquidity measure is comparable million invested in fixed assets and $43 million set aside by across organizations, regardless of size, because it is a rela- Centers for the acquisition of fixed assets. The capital tive figure. Working capital is the amount by which current invested in fixed assets decreased by $76 million, from $174 assets exceed current liabilities. Because of the different million in 1999 to $98 million in 2000, largely because of the sizes of Centers, absolute numbers are not helpful for com- write-down of $75 million of assets following the above-noted parative purposes. Working capital expressed in terms of change in accounting for fixed assets. future spending requirements is useful for such purposes. The Centers’ liquidity hinges on Members’ disbursements, NET FIXED ASSETS which span the entire calendar year. With few exceptions, The CGIAR’s asset base indicates a stable pattern of capital Members’ progress in making disbursements in the earlier acquisition. In 2000, capital expenditures totaled $15 mil- months of the year has not been encouraging. At the end of lion; the annual depreciation charge totaled $16 million. 2000, 18 percent of the value of 2000 agenda contributions Annex table A4.2 indicates capital expenditures by Center (nearly two months of income) was outstanding as accounts for the period 1996–2000. Figure 17 illustrates the 2000 receivable from Members. Figure 19 presents these accounts year-end levels of net fixed assets for all Centers. as a percentage of grants. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 53 Figure 18 Capital purchase fund by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 10 8 6 4 2 0 I I I I I IR R IITA T A F R IL R IS A R D IF P R P G R W M R A A R M IF O C IA T CI P A R M YT RD A C R IC A I I IC IC L C IS N M WA I CI Figure 19 Member receivables by Center, 2000 As a percentage of grants 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MI R M IF O R A T F IITA IL R I AT RI CI P RI SAT A R RD A IR R I IW C L A RD M Y IC R A CI IP G IF P RI ISN WA I C I C A C IM IC 54 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 20 CGIAR System current ratio, 1996–2000 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Figure 21 Working capital by Center, 1999–2000 In days 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1999 -50 2000 T R YT DA RM F AT I RI R I A CIA CIFOCIMM CIP ICAR ICLA ICRA ICRIS IFPR IITA ILRI IPG IRRI ISNA IWM ARD W ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 55 CURRENT RATIO The systemwide current ratio in the CGIAR increased mar- ginally, from 1.64 in 1999 to 1.74 in 2000. The CGIAR’s average current ratio is within the normative range. As a gen- eral rule of thumb, a current ratio of 1.5 is considered ade- quate. Five Centers have current ratios of less than 1.5: ICRAF (1.3), IFPRI (1.3), IRRI (1.4), ISNAR (1.4), and WARDA (0.8). If IRRI’s investments were considered to be part of current assets, as they were in the past, its current ratio would be 2.0. Figure 20 shows the evolution of the cur- rent ratio since 1996. WORKING CAPITAL Figure 21 compares working capital expressed as Center spending requirements in days in 1999 and 2000. The 2000 system average of 112 days of expenditure is less than the 1999 system average: 119 days. In all but one Center, the number of working days in 2000 was generally in line with that in 1999. IRRI’s average days decreased from 253 days to 130 days, primarily because of a long-term investment of $12.5 million, which is no longer considered part of working capital. Because of their low level of working capital, ISNAR and WARDA (–50 days) are in need of continued careful cash management. 56 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Compliance with Financial Guidelines The Centers are independent institutions governed by their respective boards of trustees. In the interest of transparency and consistency in financial practices and the presentation of financial information, the Centers follow financial guidelines issued by the CGIAR Secretariat. These guidelines aim to bring the CGIAR’s financial practices into conformity with those gener- ally accepted worldwide. Developed with the input of Center financial personnel, external financial experts, and Secretariat staff, the guidelines are amended as required to reflect changing practices. Guidelines covering accounting policies and the preparation of externally audited annual financial statements are particularly relevant in this regard. The most recent revision of these guidelines took effect in 1999 and brought CGIAR practices up to date with the current practices of not-for-profit organizations. As part of the annual review of substantive financial performance, Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) has reviewed the exter- nally audited 2000 Center financial statements to ensure compliance with CGIAR policy and reporting guidelines. PwC has confirmed that all Centers comply with existing policy and reporting guidelines and that any departures have resulted in no material misstatements of financial information. 58 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A1.1 CGIAR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE APPROVED RESEARCH AGENDA BY MEMBER GROUP, 1972–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Members 1972–76 1977–81 1982–86 1987–91 1992–96 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total Europe Austria 1.0 5.0 7.1 1.8 2.3 2.3 1.8 21.2 Belgium 3.5 13.7 9.2 14.2 19.9 5.5 6.0 6.8 4.7 83.6 Denmark 1.7 4.7 5.9 14.4 45.0 19.1 17.7 14.0 11.0 133.5 European Commission 17.4 28.3 59.0 76.6 23.1 24.9 6.0 22.3 257.5 Finland 2.1 21.4 3.9 2.1 2.1 1.5 1.5 34.6 France 1.1 3.1 6.1 18.3 21.4 4.9 5.9 5.9 6.0 72.8 Germany 13.3 39.1 36.6 54.6 76.2 16.6 16.3 15.5 10.2 278.4 Ireland 0.4 1.9 1.8 3.0 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 10.6 Italy 0.1 1.9 29.1 39.8 17.6 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 101.9 Luxembourg 0.3 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.3 4.7 Netherlands 4.1 11.6 20.5 30.7 55.9 14.5 14.7 11.6 13.7 177.3 Norway 3.3 9.3 11.4 20.6 28.4 7.2 8.3 8.9 7.7 105.0 Portugal 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 1.4 Spain 0.5 2.5 2.5 3.9 1.8 1.1 0.9 1.2 14.4 Sweden 7.2 14.8 16.5 28.0 39.0 7.1 9.3 10.3 9.4 141.6 Switzerland 1.9 9.5 26.6 46.3 63.6 20.9 22.7 22.8 18.3 232.6 United Kingdom 9.0 27.5 32.6 55.8 50.8 10.2 11.5 13.9 14.9 226.2 Subtotal 45.1 153.3 230.5 412.7 513.4 140.6 147.6 125.8 128.3 1,897.3 North America Canada 17.3 36.1 48.6 71.0 75.2 12.9 12.3 12.3 11.4 297.2 United States 41.6 128.1 222.0 217.3 183.5 38.3 40.5 39.4 42.1 952.8 Subtotal 58.9 164.2 270.6 288.3 258.7 51.2 52.8 51.7 53.5 1,250.0 Pacific Rim Australia 4.0 13.3 20.5 16.7 25.5 6.6 7.8 8.1 8.5 110.9 Japan 2.5 25.9 54.7 104.9 166.3 33.5 35.3 39.9 34.6 497.5 New Zealand 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.6 Subtotal 6.6 39.3 75.3 121.7 191.7 40.0 43.5 48.4 43.5 610.0 Developing and transition economies Bangladesh 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.8 Brazil 1.0 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 3.2 China 1.5 1.5 2.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0 8.2 Colombia 4.5 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.3 14.6 Côte d’Ivoire 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 Egypt, Arab Republic of 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 6.2 India 0.5 2.5 2.5 4.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 12.7 Indonesia 1.2 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.2 2.5 Iran, Islamic Republic of 2.0 3.0 1.9 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.7 13.9 Kenya 0.5 0.4 0.1 1.0 Korea, Republic of 0.5 2.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.9 6.3 Mexico 1.4 2.0 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.6 1.7 1.8 8.8 Nigeria 1.3 5.4 4.2 0.5 0.0 0.1 1.0 1.6 1.0 15.0 Pakistan 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.8 Peru 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.9 Philippines 0.7 1.6 1.1 1.7 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.4 6.8 Russian Federation 0.2 0.2 Saudi Arabia 1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 South Africa 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 2.2 Syrian Arab Republic 0.5 0.5 Thailand 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.0 Uganda 0.3 0.3 Subtotal 4.3 11.9 15.8 6.5 20.6 10.8 13.2 14.7 13.7 111.5 Foundations Ford Foundation 16.8 6.2 4.9 4.6 12.9 3.2 3.1 2.6 2.6 57.0 Kellogg Foundation 1.3 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 4.0 Rockefeller Foundation 17.1 6.7 3.5 6.3 7.7 2.1 3.4 3.5 4.0 54.3 Subtotal 35.2 13.5 9.4 11.0 21.0 5.6 6.8 6.2 6.6 115.3 International and regional organizations ADB 0.3 1.2 1.0 4.0 1.8 3.8 4.4 6.0 22.5 AFDB 0.1 0.6 5.3 5.6 1.0 0.8 2.3 1.2 17.0 Arab Fund 1.1 1.4 1.9 5.1 1.0 1.5 1.9 1.7 15.7 FAO 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.2 1.2 IDB 11.2 32.2 42.6 48.8 25.8 4.5 2.1 1.5 1.4 170.0 IDRC 3.9 5.7 6.5 3.4 4.4 2.4 2.4 3.0 2.3 34.0 IFAD 11.1 24.9 1.9 4.2 3.1 4.0 6.9 5.8 61.9 OPEC Fund 2.0 9.5 1.2 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 14.2 UNDP 7.4 21.7 37.0 38.2 38.6 4.5 3.2 2.1 1.8 154.5 UNEP 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 4.2 World Bank 16.1 53.3 116.1 162.8 222.5 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 750.8 Subtotal 39.9 128.9 238.9 264.5 312.3 63.9 63.7 67.7 66.3 1,246.0 Other donors 0.8 1.1 3.4 6.2 8.2 11.9 15.0 19.2 65.9 Total 191 512 844 1,105 1,324 320 340 330 331 5,296 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 1 59 TABLE A1.2 CGIAR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE APPROVED RESEARCH AGENDA BY CENTER, 1972–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Centers 1972–761 1977–811 1982–86 1987–91 1992–96 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total CIAT 28.3 65.8 107.0 132.5 138.8 31.7 32.1 28.7 29.7 594.5 CIFOR 30.5 10.6 11.3 11.5 12.4 76.3 CIMMYT 33.7 72.6 97.2 130.8 130.2 28.6 30.1 33.8 37.9 594.9 CIP 10.9 34.8 52.9 83.2 91.4 22.6 22.2 20.0 20.5 358.5 ICARDA 1.5 47.2 91.5 92.2 92.2 22.3 25.2 19.5 22.6 414.1 ICLARM 30.3 9.0 10.6 14.2 12.3 76.4 ICRAF 71.3 21.8 20.4 20.6 21.5 155.7 ICRISAT 19.8 59.5 103.2 143.1 134.4 26.9 26.5 21.2 21.9 556.4 IFPRI 1.0 9.9 20.5 41.5 51.3 18.2 20.1 20.8 21.5 204.7 IITA 37.1 72.4 101.1 107.9 111.3 27.5 29.2 30.7 29.4 546.7 ILRI2 13.6 80.8 107.0 155.2 124.6 25.2 24.6 26.6 23.1 580.6 IPGRI3 1.4 11.4 20.5 33.6 64.2 18.8 21.2 20.1 22.8 213.9 IRRI 30.2 71.3 104.6 137.5 139.1 28.6 34.8 32.5 33.8 612.4 ISNAR 3.3 16.8 34.4 36.6 9.9 9.6 8.2 8.8 127.6 IWMI 36.0 9.5 9.4 8.8 8.8 72.5 WARDA 1.9 9.4 12.6 28.6 34.6 8.6 10.0 10.8 8.5 124.8 Subtotal 179.3 538.2 834.9 1,120.5 1,316.9 319.6 337.1 328.1 335.4 5,310.0 Reserves/ CGIAR Committees 9.1 (16.0) 7.0 0.8 2.5 1.5 (4.3) 0.6 Total 179 538 844 1,105 1,324 320 340 330 331 5,311 1 Figures shown for 1972–80 are total expenditures (operations/capital) and may be higher or lower than the contributions for that year (due to the accounting convention followed in the 1970s). 2 Formerly ILCA and ILRAD. 3 Formerly IBPGR and INIBAP. 60 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.1 RANKING CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CGIAR RESEARCH AGENDA, 1997–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1997 1998 1999 2000 MEMBER AMOUNT MEMBER AMOUNT MEMBER AMOUNT MEMBER AMOUNT #1 World Bank 45.0 World Bank 45.0 World Bank 45.0 World Bank 45.0 United States 38.3 United States 40.5 Japan 39.9 United States 42.1 Japan 33.5 Japan 35.3 United States 39.4 Japan 34.6 European Commission 23.1 European Commission 24.9 Switzerland 22.8 European Commission 22.3 Switzerland 20.9 Switzerland 22.7 Germany 15.5 Switzerland 18.3 Denmark 19.1 Denmark 17.7 Denmark 14.0 United Kingdom 14.9 Germany 16.6 Germany 16.3 United Kingdom 13.9 Netherlands 13.7 Netherlands 14.5 Netherlands 14.7 Canada 12.3 Canada 11.4 Canada 12.9 Canada 12.3 Netherlands 11.6 Denmark 11.0 #10 United Kingdom 10.2 United Kingdom 11.5 Sweden 10.3 Germany 10.2 Norway 7.2 Sweden 9.3 Norway 8.9 Sweden 9.4 Sweden 7.1 Norway 8.3 Australia 8.1 Australia 8.5 Australia 6.5 Australia 7.8 IFAD 6.9 Norway 7.7 Belgium 5.5 Belgium 6.0 Belgium 6.8 France 6.0 France 4.9 France 5.9 European Commission 6.0 ADB 6.0 IDB 4.5 IFAD 4.0 France 5.9 IFAD 5.8 UNDP 4.5 ADB 3.8 ADB 4.4 Belgium 4.7 Italy 4.0 Rockefeller Foundation 3.4 Rockefeller Foundation 3.5 Rockefeller Foundation 4.0 Ford Foundation 3.2 UNDP 3.2 Italy 3.2 Italy 3.2 #20 IFAD 3.1 Ford Foundation 3.1 IDRC 3.0 Ford Foundation 2.6 Colombia 2.6 Italy 3.0 Colombia 2.7 Colombia 2.3 IDRC 2.3 Colombia 2.5 Ford Foundation 2.6 IDRC 2.3 Finland 2.1 IDRC 2.4 AFDB 2.3 UNDP 1.8 Rockefeller 2.1 Austria 2.3 Austria 2.3 Austria 1.8 ADB 1.8 IDB 2.1 UNDP 2.1 Mexico 1.8 Spain 1.8 Finland 2.1 Arab Fund 1.9 Iran, Islamic Republic of 1.7 Austria 1.8 Iran, Islamic Republic of 2.0 Iran, Islamic Republic of 1.8 Arab Fund 1.7 Iran, Islamic Republic of 1.5 Arab Fund 1.5 Mexico 1.7 Finland 1.5 Egypt, Arab Republic of 1.1 Egypt, Arab Republic of 1.4 Nigeria 1.6 IDB 1.4 #30 AFDB 1.0 Spain 1.1 Finland 1.5 Egypt, Arab Republic of 1.4 Arab Fund 1.0 Ireland 1.0 IDB 1.5 Luxembourg 1.3 Ireland 0.8 Nigeria 1.0 Egypt, Arab Republic of 1.4 Spain 1.2 India 0.8 Korea, Republic of 0.9 Spain 0.9 AFDB 1.2 Luxembourg 0.7 India 0.8 Ireland 0.9 Nigeria 1.0 Korea, Republic of 0.6 AFDB 0.8 Korea, Republic of 0.8 China 1.0 Brazil 0.5 Philippines 0.7 Luxembourg 0.7 Korea, Republic of 0.9 Indonesia 0.5 Luxembourg 0.7 India 0.7 India 0.8 Mexico 0.5 Brazil 0.7 China 0.7 Ireland 0.8 China 0.5 South Africa 0.6 New Zealand 0.5 UNEP 0.7 #40 Pakistan 0.5 Mexico 0.6 South Africa 0.5 South Africa 0.6 South Africa 0.5 FAO 0.5 Syria 0.5 New Zealand 0.5 Thailand 0.5 China 0.5 Portugal 0.5 Brazil 0.4 Philippines 0.4 Kenya 0.5 Indonesia 0.4 Portugal 0.4 Kellogg Foundation 0.3 New Zealand 0.4 Kenya 0.4 Philippines 0.4 FAO 0.3 Peru 0.4 Brazil 0.4 Bangladesh 0.3 Portugal 0.3 Thailand 0.3 Philippines 0.3 Uganda 0.3 OPEC Fund 0.2 Kellogg Foundation 0.3 Bangladesh 0.3 FAO 0.2 UNEP 0.2 Portugal 0.3 Peru 0.3 Indonesia 0.2 Côte d’Ivoire 0.2 OPEC Fund 0.2 FAO 0.2 Peru 0.2 #50 Bangladesh 0.1 Pakistan 0.2 UNEP 0.2 OPEC Fund 0.2 Indonesia 0.1 OPEC Fund 0.2 Pakistan 0.2 Bangladesh 0.1 Côte d’Ivoire 0.1 Kenya 0.1 Côte d’Ivoire 0.1 Thailand 0.1 Thailand 0.1 UNEP 0.1 Kellogg Foundation 0.1 Côte d’Ivoire 0.1 Pakistan 0.0 Kellogg Foundation 0.0 Other donors 8.2 Other donors 11.9 Other donors 15.0 Other donors 19.2 Total 320 340 330 331 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 61 TABLE A2.2 CGIAR FUNDING BY MEMBER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) MEMBERS UNRESTRICTED RESTRICTED T O TA L Europe Austria 1.3 0.5 1.8 Belgium 1.3 3.4 4.7 Denmark 6.9 4.1 11.0 European Commission 22.3 22.3 Finland 1.3 0.2 1.5 France 1.1 4.9 6.0 Germany 2.5 7.7 10.2 Ireland 0.4 0.4 0.8 Italy 1.7 1.4 3.2 Luxembourg 0.2 1.1 1.3 Netherlands 8.8 4.9 13.7 Norway 6.0 1.7 7.7 Portugal 0.2 0.2 0.4 Spain 0.4 0.8 1.2 Sweden 5.8 3.6 9.4 Switzerland 5.9 12.4 18.3 United Kingdom 14.9 14.9 SUBTOTAL 43.8 84.5 128.3 North America Canada 8.0 3.4 11.4 United States 26.6 15.5 42.1 SUBTOTAL 34.6 18.9 53.5 Pacific Rim Australia 3.6 4.9 8.5 Japan 32.6 2.0 34.6 New Zealand 0.5 0.5 SUBTOTAL 36.2 7.3 43.5 Developing countries Bangladesh 0.3 0.3 Brazil 0.1 0.3 0.4 China 0.7 0.3 1.0 Colombia 2.3 2.3 Côte d’Ivoire 0.1 0.1 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0.5 0.9 1.4 India 0.6 0.2 0.8 Indonesia 0.2 0.2 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.2 1.5 1.7 Kenya 0.1 0.1 Korea, Republic of 0.5 0.5 0.9 Mexico 0.1 1.7 1.8 Nigeria 1.0 1.0 Pakistan 0.2 0.2 Peru 0.0 0.2 0.2 Philippines 0.4 0.4 South Africa 0.6 0.6 Thailand 0.1 0.1 Uganda 0.3 0.3 SUBTOTAL 4.4 9.3 13.7 TOTAL MEMBER COUNTRIES 119.1 119.9 239.0 Foundations Ford Foundation 2.6 2.6 Kellogg Foundation 0.0 0.0 Rockefeller Foundation 4.0 4.0 FOUNDATION TOTAL 6.6 6.6 International and regional organizations ADB 6.0 6.0 AFDB 1.2 1.2 Arab Fund 1.7 1.7 FAO 0.2 0.2 IDB 1.4 1.4 IDRC 2.3 2.3 IFAD 5.8 5.8 OPEC Fund 0.2 0.2 UNDP 1.8 1.8 UNEP 0.7 0.7 World Bank 45.0 45.0 ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL 45.0 21.3 66.3 OTHER DONORS 19.2 19.2 GRAND TOTAL 164 167 331 62 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.3a SUPPORT TO THE AGREED RESEARCH AGENDA BY MEMBER BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Unrestricted support Members CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA UNALLOC. TOTAL Australia 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.2 3.6 Austria 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.3 Belgium 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.3 Brazil 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Canada 0.8 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.5 8.0 China 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 Côte d’Ivoire 0.1 0.1 Denmark 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.1 6.9 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0.2 0.4 0.5 Finland 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.3 France 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.1 Germany 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.2 2.5 India 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.6 Indonesia 0.2 0.2 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 Ireland 0.1 0.3 0.4 Italy 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.1 1.7 Japan 3.3 1.3 2.3 1.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 2.8 1.4 3.8 1.3 1.9 7.5 0.3 0.9 1.8 32.6 Korea, Republic of 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 Luxembourg 0.2 0.2 Mexico 0.1 0.1 Netherlands 0.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.7 8.8 Nigeria 1.0 1.0 Norway 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 6.0 Peru 0.0 0.0 0.0 Philippines 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 Portugal 0.1 0.1 0.2 Spain 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 Sweden 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 5.8 Switzerland 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 5.9 Thailand 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 United States 2.3 0.6 4.3 1.1 1.5 0.7 0.6 2.2 1.7 3.3 3.0 0.6 3.5 0.5 0.8 0.3 26.6 World Bank1 3.8 1.4 4.2 2.7 3.7 2.0 3.0 2.8 3.1 3.8 3.1 3.3 3.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 0.8 45.0 Advance 2001 /draw on reserves 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 5.0 Total unrestricted 13.5 6.9 14.4 10.9 9.8 7.0 8.1 12.4 9.4 15.9 12.8 12.0 18.8 5.6 5.3 5.6 0.8 169.1 1 Total World Bank contribution was $45 million, of which $44.25 million was allocated to Centers and $0.75 million for Committees and reserves. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 63 TABLE A2.3b MEMBER SUPPORT TO THE APPROVED RESEARCH AGENDA BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Restricted contributions Members CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA UNALLOC. TOTAL ADB 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.4 0.4 1.1 0.1 0.5 6.0 AFDB 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.2 Arab Fund 1.7 1.7 Australia 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.1 4.9 Austria 0.2 0.3 0.5 Bangladesh 0.2 0.1 0.3 Belgium 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.1 0.1 1.3 0.1 3.4 Brazil 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 Canada 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.4 China 0.3 0.3 Colombia 2.1 0.2 0.1 2.3 Denmark 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.0 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 4.1 European Commission 2.8 1.7 3.0 1.9 2.2 0.8 2.3 1.7 1.3 0.1 1.5 1.5 1.4 0.1 22.3 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0.9 0.9 FAO 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 Finland 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 Ford Foundation 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.2 2.6 France 0.7 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 4.9 Germany 0.7 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.4 7.7 IDB 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.4 IDRC 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.3 IFAD 0.0 0.4 0.8 0.3 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 5.8 India 0.1 0.2 0.2 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.0 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.1 1.5 Ireland 0.1 0.3 0.4 Italy 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.1 1.4 Japan 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 2.0 Kellogg Foundation 0.0 0.0 Kenya 0.1 0.1 Korea, Republic of 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 Luxembourg 0.2 0.7 0.1 1.1 Mexico 0.5 1.2 1.7 Netherlands 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.2 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.1 4.9 New Zealand 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 Norway 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.7 OPEC Fund 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 Pakistan 0.1 0.0 0.2 Peru 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Portugal 0.1 0.1 0.2 Rockefeller Foundation 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.2 4.0 South Africa 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 Spain 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 Sweden 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.7 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 3.6 Switzerland 1.6 0.1 1.8 1.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.7 2.5 0.6 0.1 12.4 Uganda 0.3 0.3 UNDP 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.8 UNEP 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 United Kingdom 1.0 0.8 1.4 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.7 0.4 0.7 1.8 1.0 2.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 14.9 United States 1.0 0.2 0.8 1.3 0.1 1.2 1.0 1.5 1.6 5.2 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 15.5 Total restricted 14.3 4.6 18.3 9.3 11.6 5.0 12.8 8.8 9.9 11.9 10.0 9.3 14.9 2.5 2.7 2.1 147.9 Non-Members 2.0 0.8 5.2 0.3 1.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 2.2 1.5 0.3 1.5 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.8 19.2 Grand total 29.7 12.4 37.9 20.5 22.6 12.3 21.5 21.9 21.5 29.4 23.1 22.8 33.8 8.8 8.8 8.5 0.8 336.2 (Unrestricted and restricted contributions) 64 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.4a MONTHLY DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDING BY MEMBER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Jan. Feb. Mar. April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Receivable TOTAL Unrestricted support Members Australia 3.6 3.6 Austria 1.3 1.3 Belgium 1.3 1.3 Brazil 0.0 0.1 0.1 Canada 8.0 8.0 China 0.7 0.7 Côte d’Ivoire 0.1 0.1 Denmark 0.5 6.3 6.9 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0.5 0.5 Finland 1.3 1.3 France 1.1 1.1 Germany 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.3 2.5 India 0.6 0.6 Indonesia 0.2 0.2 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.1 0.1 0.2 Ireland 0.1 0.3 0.4 Italy 1.7 1.7 Japan 32.6 32.6 Korea, Republic of 0.4 0.1 0.5 Luxembourg 0.2 0.2 Mexico 0.1 0.1 Netherlands 0.7 3.5 0.3 0.9 0.7 2.4 0.3 8.8 Nigeria 1.0 1.0 Norway 6.0 6.0 Peru 0.0 0.0 Philippines 0.4 0.4 Portugal 0.2 0.2 Spain 0.4 0.4 Sweden 1.9 0.4 0.2 2.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 5.8 Switzerland 5.9 5.9 Thailand 0.1 0.1 United States 20.0 6.7 26.6 World Bank 35.2 6.8 3.0 45.0 Reserves/advance 5.0 5.0 Subtotal 47.4 0.4 3.7 2.6 1.9 16.1 12.7 9.1 11.0 0.6 20.0 41.2 2.4 169.1 Restricted support Members ADB 0.2 0.8 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.6 1.5 6.0 AFDB 1.2 1.2 Arab Fund 0.8 0.9 1.7 Australia 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.6 2.2 4.9 Austria 0.5 0.5 Bangladesh 0.3 0.3 Belgium 3.4 3.4 Brazil 0.3 0.3 Canada 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 3.4 China 0.3 0.3 Colombia 2.3 2.3 Denmark 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.2 2.9 4.0 European Commission 22.3 22.3 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0.9 0.9 FAO 0.0 0.2 0.2 Finland 0.2 0.2 Ford Foundation 2.6 2.6 France 0.7 4.2 4.9 Germany 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.1 1.8 3.4 7.7 IDB 0.1 0.0 1.3 1.4 IDRC 0.0 0.1 2.2 2.3 IFAD 0.1 0.0 2.1 3.6 5.8 India 0.1 0.2 0.2 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.1 1.4 1.5 Ireland 0.4 0.4 Italy 1.4 1.4 Japan 2.0 2.0 Kenya 0.1 0.1 Korea, Republic of 0.5 0.5 Luxembourg 1.1 1.1 Mexico 1.7 1.7 Netherlands 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.5 3.1 4.9 New Zealand 0.2 0.3 0.5 Norway 1.7 1.7 OPEC Fund 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 Pakistan 0.2 0.2 Peru 0.1 0.1 0.2 Portugal 0.2 0.2 Rockefeller Foundation 0.3 1.1 0.8 0.3 1.5 4.0 South Africa 0.6 0.6 Spain 0.8 0.8 Sweden 3.0 0.3 0.4 3.6 Switzerland 11.3 0.5 0.5 12.3 Uganda 0.3 0.3 UNDP 0.0 1.8 1.8 UNEP 0.1 0.6 0.7 United Kingdom 0.0 0.1 2.3 0.1 0.8 0.3 2.3 2.8 3.5 2.8 14.9 United States 0.2 0.7 0.2 7.0 7.5 15.5 Non-Members 0.1 0.2 2.1 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.2 2.5 5.4 5.2 19.2 Subtotal 12.5 1.3 1.2 3.0 8.2 9.4 3.8 2.8 10.4 7.9 0.7 47.8 58.0 167.0 Total monthly amount 59.9 1.7 4.8 5.6 10.1 25.5 16.5 12.0 21.4 8.6 20.7 89.0 60.5 336.0 Total monthly percent 18% 1% 1% 2% 3% 8% 5% 4% 6% 3% 6% 26% 18% 100% Cumulative amount 59.9 61.6 66.4 72.0 82.1 107.6 124.1 136.1 157.5 166.0 186.7 275.6 336.1 336.0 Cumulative percent 18% 18% 20% 21% 24% 32% 37% 40% 47% 49% 56% 82% 100% 100% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 65 TABLE A2.4b MEMBER CONTRIBUTIONS DISBURSED THROUGH THE WORLD BANK, 1999–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1999 Disbursement 2000 Disbursement Members National in U.S. Month National in U.S. Month currency dollars currency dollars Austria 1.5 May 1.5 April Canada1 CAD 8.0 12.6 July CAD 12.6 8.5 May/August China 0.7 December 0.7 January 2001 European Commission EUR 14.9 13.5 January 2001 Finland FIM 8.0 1.7 May FIM 8.0 1.3 December France2 FF 14.3 2.1 February 2000 FF 14.4 1.8 September Italy 2.5 October 2.1 September Mexico 0.1 April 0.1 May Norway NOK 57.0 7.3 August NOK 57.0 6.6 June Peru 0.1 September Portugal 0.5 July 0.5 March 2001 South Africa 0.5 December 0.5 December Spain 1.1 April 0.7 May Thailand 0.1 December 0.1 February 2001 United States3 4.9 November 32.5 July/Dec Total 35.7 70.4 1 Includes allocation to a non-CGIAR center (IBSRAM), and Linkage Fund contributions(CAD 450,000). 2 Includes allocations to three non-CGIAR centers (AVRDC, IBSRAM, and ICRA). 3 Includes grants for strengthening African networks($4,759), and for integrating agricultural and environmental research ($1,139). 66 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.5 CGIAR FUNDING BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Unrestricted Restricted Member Percent of support support total targeted support CIAT 13.5 16.2 29.7 55% CIFOR 6.9 5.5 12.4 44% CIMMYT 14.4 23.5 37.9 62% CIP 10.9 9.6 20.5 47% ICARDA 9.8 12.8 22.6 57% ICLARM 7.0 5.3 12.3 43% ICRAF 8.1 13.4 21.5 62% ICRISAT 12.4 9.5 21.9 43% IFPRI 9.4 12.1 21.5 56% IITA 15.9 13.5 29.4 46% ILRI 12.8 10.3 23.1 45% IPGRI 12.0 10.8 22.8 47% IRRI 18.8 15.0 33.8 44% ISNAR 5.6 3.2 8.8 37% IWMI 5.3 3.5 8.8 40% WARDA 5.6 2.9 8.5 34% Center total 168.4 167.1 335.4 50% Reserves/CGIAR Committees (4.3) (4.3) Total grants 164 167 331 50% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 67 TABLE A2.6 FUNDING OUTCOMES BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 2000 financing Funding in 2000 funding 2000 relation to Requirements financing in relation to Unrestricted Restricted World Bank Total plan 1999 funding support 1 support 2 contributions funding CIAT 32.9 9.1 16.2 4.4 29.7 90% 103% CIFOR 12.2 5.3 5.5 1.7 12.4 102% 108% CIMMYT 33.1 9.8 23.5 4.6 37.9 115% 112% CIP 17.9 7.6 9.6 3.3 20.5 115% 103% ICARDA 22.9 5.6 12.8 4.1 22.6 99% 116% ICLARM 14.7 4.7 5.3 2.3 12.3 84% 87% ICRAF 22.6 5.0 13.4 3.1 21.5 95% 104% ICRISAT 23.3 9.2 9.4 3.4 21.9 94% 103% IFPRI 23.2 6.1 12.1 3.2 21.4 92% 103% IITA 32.5 12.2 13.5 3.8 29.4 90% 96% ILRI 28.0 9.6 10.3 3.2 23.1 83% 87% IPGRI 24.2 8.3 10.7 3.8 22.8 94% 113% IRRI 30.1 14.8 15.0 3.9 33.8 112% 104% ISNAR 9.5 3.8 3.2 1.8 8.8 93% 107% IWMI 10.1 3.7 3.5 1.6 8.8 87% 100% WARDA 12.2 4.8 2.4 1.3 8.5 70% 79% Subtotal 349.4 119.6 166.5 49.3 335.4 96% 102% Reserves/CGIAR Committees (4.3) (4.3) Total 349 121 167 45 331 1 Unrestricted support in the form of unrestricted contributions. 2 Support targeted at programs or specific projects. 68 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.7 CGIAR SYSTEM GRANTS BY CENTER, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Grants supporting the agreed research agenda CIAT 31.0 31.7 32.1 28.7 29.7 CIFOR 8.7 10.6 11.3 11.5 12.4 CIMMYT 27.4 28.6 30.1 33.8 37.9 CIP 22.7 22.6 22.2 20.0 20.5 ICARDA 21.1 22.3 25.2 19.5 22.6 ICLARM 9.6 9.0 10.6 14.2 12.3 ICRAF 17.4 21.8 20.4 20.6 21.5 ICRISAT 27.4 26.9 26.5 21.2 21.9 IFPRI 16.0 18.2 20.1 20.8 21.5 IITA 22.4 27.5 29.2 30.7 29.4 ILRI 24.8 25.2 24.6 26.6 23.1 IPGRI 16.4 18.8 21.2 20.1 22.8 IRRI 28.7 28.6 34.8 32.5 33.8 ISNAR 10.7 9.9 9.6 8.2 8.8 IWMI 9.0 9.5 9.4 8.8 8.8 WARDA 8.7 8.6 10.0 10.8 8.5 Total grants 301.9 319.6 337.1 328.1 335.4 Other net flows Reserves/advance (5.0) CGIAR Committees 2.3 0.8 2.5 1.5 0.8 Total support to the agreed research agenda 304.2 320.4 339.6 329.6 331.2 Non-agenda funding Total support to non-agenda 28.4 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total funding 333 334 340 330 331 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 69 TABLE A2.8 WORLD BANK FUNDING BY CENTER, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentage terms) Amount in millions of U.S. dollars Percent of total agenda funding 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 CIAT 4.9 4.6 3.1 3.4 4.4 18% 15% 10% 11% 15% CIFOR 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.7 8% 10% 11% 12% 14% CIMMYT 4.4 3.7 3.3 3.8 4.6 17% 14% 12% 12% 12% CIP 1.6 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.3 8% 8% 10% 13% 16% ICARDA 3.3 2.9 5.4 2.1 4.1 18% 14% 24% 9% 18% ICLARM 1.5 1.3 1.1 4.1 2.3 20% 13% 12% 38% 19% ICRAF 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.5 3.1 9% 11% 10% 12% 14% ICRISAT 5.2 6.7 5.7 2.4 3.4 20% 24% 21% 9% 16% IFPRI 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 3.2 13% 10% 11% 12% 15% IITA 3.8 3.8 3.0 2.7 3.8 17% 17% 11% 9% 13% ILRI 6.3 5.2 4.7 3.9 3.2 26% 21% 18% 16% 14% IPGRI 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.9 3.8 13% 12% 11% 14% 17% IRRI 4.8 4.5 3.1 3.7 3.9 18% 16% 11% 11% 12% ISNAR 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.8 23% 12% 15% 10% 20% IWMI 1.5 1.2 1.0 2.3 1.6 21% 13% 10% 24% 18% WARDA 0.6 0.9 1.1 2.2 1.3 7% 10% 13% 20% 15% Center total 44.4 44.2 42.5 43.5 49.3 16% 15% 13% 13% 15% CGIAR Committees 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.8 and System review 1.5 Reserve 0.5 0.5 0.5 (2.0) Advance 2001 (3.0) Total 44.9 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 70 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.1 CGIAR INVESTMENTS BY CENTER, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 CIAT 36.8 33.3 33.5 30.7 29.5 CIFOR 9.4 10.6 11.1 12.7 12.6 CIMMYT 28.7 30.4 32.2 37.4 39.0 CIP 24.6 24.7 21.7 21.6 20.2 ICARDA 23.2 27.6 23.6 22.8 23.4 ICLARM 8.6 8.6 10.4 12.4 10.4 ICRAF 17.4 22.2 21.1 21.8 20.7 ICRISAT 28.8 26.7 21.8 23.2 23.3 IFPRI 16.2 18.1 18.6 20.1 21.2 IITA 28.4 28.5 29.4 32.7 30.1 ILRI 25.9 26.7 27.7 26.5 26.5 IPGRI 16.5 18.6 21.7 20.4 21.5 IRRI 30.4 28.2 35.0 35.1 32.6 ISNAR 11.2 10.4 9.9 9.7 8.2 IWMI 9.2 9.6 9.2 8.8 8.9 WARDA 9.8 9.2 9.9 10.9 9.4 Agreed agenda 325.0 333.3 336.8 346.8 337.5 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 71 TABLE A3.2 CGIAR RESEARCH AGENDA INVESTMENTS BY ACTIVITY, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentages) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % Increasing productivity 129.1 40% 133.1 40% 124.3 37% 117.3 34% 119.7 36% of which: Germplasm enhancement and breeding 58.8 18% 63.7 19% 60.0 18% 61.2 18% 61.8 18% Production systems development and management 70.2 22% 69.4 21% 64.3 19% 56.1 16% 57.9 18% Cropping systems 40.5 12% 35.1 11% 32.7 10% 29.3 8% 32.1 10% Livestock systems 18.4 6% 18.7 6% 19.7 6% 15.6 4% 13.8 4% Tree systems 9.2 3% 14.2 4% 10.4 3% 9.3 3% 8.3 3% Fish systems 2.2 1% 1.4 0.4% 1.5 0.4% 1.9 0.5% 3.7 1% Protecting the environment 53.7 17% 57.4 17% 64.5 19% 67.9 20% 60.4 18% Saving biodiversity 34.6 11% 35.3 11% 37.2 11% 36.2 10% 34.8 10% Improving policies 38.9 12% 37.3 11% 39.9 12% 46.8 13% 48.0 14% Strengthening NARS 68.7 21% 70.2 21% 70.9 21% 78.6 23% 74.6 22% Training 24.6 8% 25.1 8% 27.0 8% 29.8 9% 29.8 9% Documentation/publication/information 18.3 6% 19.9 6% 20.1 6% 20.7 6% 19.9 6% Institution building/advice to NARS 12.2 4% 11.5 3% 10.5 3% 12.7 4% 10.2 3% Institution building networks 13.7 4% 13.7 4% 13.3 4% 15.4 4% 14.7 4% TOTAL 325.0 100% 333.3 100% 336.8 100% 346.8 100% 337.5 100% 72 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.3 CENTERS’ RESEARCH AGENDA INVESTMENTS BY ACTIVITY, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Increasing Productivity Protecting Strengthening NARS Funding Source Saving Improving Enhance Production Systems Dev & Mgmt the Total Member Center and breed Crops Livestock Trees Fish Enhance environment biodiversity policies Training Info Org/Mgmt Networks funding income Reserves CIAT 7.8 3.2 1.3 6.7 4.3 1.5 1.4 1.3 0.5 1.6 29.5 29.7 1.0 CIFOR 3.1 3.8 1.6 2.8 0.2 1.1 12.6 12.4 0.4 CIMMYT 11.3 3.2 7.4 5.5 1.5 5.4 1.5 1.8 1.5 39.0 37.9 1.3 CIP 6.8 5.2 3.1 1.9 3.2 20.2 20.5 0.6 ICARDA 4.1 3.8 1.7 5.1 4.0 1.5 0.7 0.7 1.5 0.3 23.4 22.6 1.1 ICLARM 1.0 3.7 2.6 0.1 1.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 10.4 12.3 0.5 ICRAF 1.0 5.0 4.7 0.8 3.5 4.2 1.0 0.6 20.7 21.5 0.8 ICRISAT 6.2 3.6 0.2 0.1 3.2 2.3 3.5 2.3 0.8 1.0 23.3 21.9 1.7 IFPRI 2.2 13.0 3.1 3.0 21.2 21.5 0.9 IITA 7.8 7.2 4.4 1.1 2.7 1.6 1.4 2.0 1.9 30.1 29.4 0.9 ILRI 1.9 10.6 6.0 1.4 2.6 1.6 1.3 1.1 26.5 23.1 1.8 (1.6) IPGRI 2.7 0.9 0.1 1.7 7.9 2.9 1.6 2.0 0.2 1.5 21.5 22.8 0.6 IRRI 9.7 3.6 7.2 2.2 3.8 2.6 3.3 0.2 32.6 33.8 1.6 ISNAR 1.2 2.3 1.4 3.2 0.1 8.2 8.8 0.3 IWMI 3.6 3.1 1.1 1.1 8.8 8.8 0.4 WARDA 1.5 1.4 2.0 0.5 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.7 9.4 8.5 0.3 (0.6) Total 61.8 32.1 13.8 8.3 3.7 60.4 34.8 48.0 29.8 19.9 10.2 14.7 337.5 335.4 13.9 (2.2) Undertaking investments: 119.7 60.4 34.8 48.0 74.6 337.5 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 73 TABLE A3.4 REGIONAL ALLOCATIONS, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentages) Latin America and West Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa Asia the Caribbean North Africa EXPENDITURE % $ % $ % $ % $ CIAT 29.5 23% 6.8 12% 3.5 63% 18.5 2% 0.7 CIFOR 12.6 29% 3.7 37% 4.6 34% 4.2 CIMMYT 39.0 37% 14.5 28% 10.9 25% 9.7 10% 3.9 CIP 20.2 18% 3.6 51% 10.3 26% 5.2 5% 1.1 ICARDA 23.4 15% 3.5 12% 2.7 3% 0.7 71% 16.5 ICLARM 10.4 30% 3.2 58% 6.0 4% 0.4 8% 0.8 ICRAF 20.7 76% 15.7 18% 3.6 7% 1.4 ICRISAT 23.3 50% 11.6 48% 11.3 1% 0.2 1% 0.2 IFPRI 21.2 50% 10.6 26% 5.5 18% 3.7 7% 1.4 IITA 30.1 96% 28.8 2% 0.7 2% 0.7 ILRI 26.5 67% 17.8 21% 5.6 10% 2.6 2% 0.5 IPGRI 21.5 28% 6.0 27% 5.8 23% 5.0 22% 4.8 IRRI 32.6 4% 1.3 92% 30.0 3% 1.0 1% 0.3 ISNAR 8.2 38% 3.1 27% 2.2 29% 2.4 6% 0.5 IWMI 8.9 7% 0.7 81% 7.2 5% 0.4 7% 0.6 WARDA 9.4 100% 9.4 Total 338 42% 140 32% 110 17% 56 9% 31 74 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.5 CGIAR OBJECT EXPENDITURES, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentages) Personnel Supplies/ Travel Depreciation Total services CIAT 15.5 10.7 2.2 1.2 29.5 CIFOR 5.8 5.5 0.7 0.6 12.6 CIMMYT 20.1 15.2 2.2 1.4 39.0 CIP 8.8 9.7 1.2 0.5 20.2 ICARDA 9.0 10.8 2.5 1.2 23.4 ICLARM 4.6 4.9 0.9 0.0 10.4 ICRAF 11.1 6.4 2.2 1.0 20.7 ICRISAT 12.5 7.7 1.7 1.4 23.3 IFPRI 10.0 9.3 1.5 0.3 21.2 IITA 13.9 12.2 1.7 2.4 30.1 ILRI 13.3 9.6 1.6 2.0 26.5 IPGRI 9.5 10.1 1.5 0.4 21.5 IRRI 14.9 12.8 2.7 2.2 32.6 ISNAR 4.6 2.6 0.8 0.2 8.2 IWMI 5.5 1.9 1.0 0.5 8.9 WARDA 4.3 3.6 0.5 1.0 9.4 Total 164 133 25 16 338 Personnel Supplies/ Travel Depreciation Total services CIAT 52% 36% 7% 4% 100% CIFOR 46% 44% 5% 4% 100% CIMMYT 52% 39% 6% 4% 100% CIP 44% 48% 6% 2% 100% ICARDA 38% 46% 11% 5% 100% ICLARM 44% 48% 8% 0% 100% ICRAF 54% 31% 11% 5% 100% ICRISAT 54% 33% 7% 6% 100% IFPRI 47% 44% 7% 1% 100% IITA 46% 41% 6% 8% 100% ILRI 50% 36% 6% 8% 100% IPGRI 44% 47% 7% 2% 100% IRRI 46% 39% 8% 7% 100% ISNAR 56% 32% 10% 2% 100% IWMI 62% 22% 11% 6% 100% WARDA 46% 38% 5% 11% 100% Total 49% 39% 7% 5% 100% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 75 TABLE A3.6 CGIAR STAFFING, 1996–2000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 International Other International Other International Other International Other International Other staff staff staff staff staff staff staff staff staff staff CIAT 76 650 60 678 64 639 62 610 58 638 CIFOR 32 78 31 86 31 83 30 86 37 118 CIMMYT 73 669 81 775 88 726 86 746 86 795 CIP 63 576 64 527 62 480 64 607 58 529 ICARDA 85 395 76 405 83 333 92 330 94 330 ICLARM 20 207 27 183 28 263 30 291 24 225 ICRAF 53 355 50 286 56 313 52 305 47 258 ICRISAT 84 1,787 62 1,289 55 1,041 59 1,155 54 1,120 IFPRI 41 82 45 94 43 89 44 83 52 90 IITA 86 1,659 86 1,499 82 1,268 79 1,090 83 1,043 ILRI 79 800 61 806 80 777 76 725 67 746 IPGRI 41 86 41 121 43 112 46 112 46 143 IRRI 64 1,374 82 836 90 835 82 960 79 997 ISNAR 38 53 53 35 49 38 45 40 32 35 IWMI 22 305 22 356 21 243 25 226 26 211 WARDA 21 340 21 319 17 338 35 335 30 364 Total 877 9,416 862 8,295 892 7,578 907 7,701 873 7,642 76 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.7 CENTERS’ INFLATION RATES, 1996–2000 (calculated by uniform measurement) CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Total 1996 4.7% 2.8% 8.6% 3.9% 4.6% 4.1% 5.1% 2.4% 5.3% 8.6% 2.3% 4.3% 4.2% (0.5%) 5.1% 1.1% 4.5% 1997 4.4% (1.2%) 9.3% 3.5% 2.6% 0.2% 4.1% (0.4%) 3.1% 5.5% 2.9% 0.9% (1.5%) (5.7%) 2.0% (1.7%) 2.6% 1998 (0.2%) (5.7%) 1.0% 1.7% 1.3% (4.6%) 2.4% 1.1% 1.6% 4.2% 2.9% 0.8% (7.7%) 1.2% 0.7% 2.6% 1.0% 1999 (2.9%) 11.6% 7.0% (0.4%) 1.1% 4.7% (1.8%) 10.0% 2.2% (14.5%) (1.5%) (2.1%) 5.5% 2.1% 0.1% (0.1%) 0.2% 2000 (1.9%) 2.0% 6.4% 2.5% 0.1% (0.9%) (0.9%) (1.1%) 3.1% (4.1%) 0.4% (0.8%) (0.4%) 0.0% 0.8% (3.2%) 0.3% Avg. (1996–2000) 0.8% 1.7% 6.4% 2.2% 1.9% 0.6% 1.7% 2.3% 3.0% (0.4%) 1.4% 0.6% (0.1%) (0.6%) 1.7% (0.3%) 2.7% Cum. (1996–2000) 3.9% 9.0% 36.4% 11.6% 10.0% 3.2% 9.0% 12.2% 16.2% (2.2%) 7.2% 3.1% (0.4%) (3.0%) 8.8% (1.3%) 14.1% Notes: The inflation rates are dollar-based annual rates for each Center. They are derived from: 1. The currency basket of a Center’s expenditures (Source: Centers' 2004 MTP submissions); 2. Annual inflation rates (as measured by the consumer price index) on the currencies in the basket (Source: IMF, International Financial Statistics); and 3. Annual changes in exchange rates of these currencies against the U.S. dollar (Source: IMF, International Financial Statistics). INFLATION RATES FOR SELECTED CURRENCIES AND REGIONS1 CURRENCIES REGIONS U.S. Colombian Mexican Philippine Pound Kenyan Indonesian Western1 Middle Year dollar CFA peso peso peso sterling shilling rupee Africa Asia Hemisph. East 1996 2.9% 2.7% 20.2% 34.4% 8.4% 2.4% 8.8% 7.9% 22.8% 7.7% 23.8% 11.6% 1997 2.3% 5.7% 18.5% 20.6% 5.1% 3.1% 12.0% 6.6% 15.4% 5.0% 13.7% 6.6% 1998 1.6% 4.7% 21.8% 15.9% 8.9% 3.4% 5.8% 57.6% 6.0% 9.3% 10.2% 6.3% 1999 2.2% 0.8% 11.2% 16.6% 6.7% 1.6% 2.6% 20.5% 24.1% (65.9%) 9.7% 0.0% 2000 3.2% 2.2% 9.5% 9.5% 4.3% 2.9% 5.9% 2.0% 3.9% 1.6% 8.7% 5.4% 1 Excludes the United States and Canada. MOVEMENTS OF SELECTED CURRENCIES AGAINST THE U.S. DOLLAR2 Colombian Mexican Nigerian Philippine Indonesian Japanese Year CFA peso peso naira peso rupee yen 1996 2.5% 13.6% 18.4% 0.0% 2.0% 4.2% 15.7% 1997 14.1% 10.1% 4.1% 0.0% 12.4% 24.2% 11.2% 1998 1.1% 25.0% 15.4% 0.0% 38.8% 244.2% 8.2% 1999 4.4% 23.2% 4.6% 321.9% (4.4%) (21.6%) (13.0%) 2000 15.6% 18.9% (1.1%) 13.5% 13.1% 7.2% (5.4%) 2 Positive percentages reflect devaluations; while negative percentages reflect revaluations. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 77 TABLE A4.1 CENTERS’ FINANCIAL POSITIONS, 2000 (thousands of U.S. dollars) Assets CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA TOTAL Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 5,873 6,241 3,909 5,477 12,219 8,014 1,023 19,408 8,276 17,258 10,349 11,403 31,336 3,278 4,937 2,326 151,327 Accounts receivable: Donors 5,831 2,794 8,266 3,572 4,954 3,075 4,719 3,080 3,327 6,361 4,724 3,221 4,180 635 1,134 950 60,823 Employees 127 218 420 268 311 261 122 449 636 214 12 77 382 3,498 Others 1,255 676 914 323 801 1,171 2,453 1,592 470 1,188 436 1,233 137 149 777 13,576 Inventories 328 218 571 380 4 149 942 966 1,378 925 30 615 6,506 Prepaid expenses 339 437 167 505 15 71 400 106 235 105 505 27 137 20 3,069 Other current assets 1,000 38 399 2,775 863 173 5,248 Total current assets 14,753 10,366 13,765 10,777 19,170 15,315 8,537 25,871 12,466 25,334 18,510 15,165 38,393 4,089 6,465 5,071 244,048 Fixed assets Property, plant, and equipment 23,008 4,687 33,953 10,844 26,273 257 11,675 35,633 2,159 37,929 54,360 3,769 28,085 3,333 4,518 8,856 289,339 Less: accumulated depreciation 12,555 2,509 19,633 7,489 21,916 67 4,385 22,777 1,601 30,783 34,880 2,002 18,253 2,819 3,264 6,331 191,265 Total fixed assets (net) 10,453 2,178 14,320 3,355 4,357 190 7,290 12,856 558 7,146 19,480 1,767 9,832 514 1,254 2,525 98,074 Other assets 122 320 5,096 425 5,685 203 12,539 1,338 25,728 Total assets 25,328 12,544 28,085 14,132 23,527 15,825 20,923 39,152 18,709 32,480 37,990 17,135 60,764 4,603 9,057 7,596 367,850 Liabilities and net assets Current liabilities Bank indebtedness 67 137 204 Accounts payable: Donors 3,975 2,106 2,819 689 4,210 5,789 5,096 3,433 7,589 5,688 1,863 2,712 4,548 1,560 1,604 2,976 56,658 Employees 385 385 558 89 372 1,078 1,803 22 445 232 5,369 Others 2,684 68 1,677 4,483 2,474 967 781 1,609 18 2,267 1,506 3,610 882 520 505 1,915 25,966 In-trust accounts 1,748 0 1,350 79 339 118 3,634 Accruals and provisions 177 2,652 3,549 1,781 2,272 2,221 597 1,153 1,859 5,282 2,229 1,649 21,179 405 158 1,096 48,259 Total current liabilities 9,036 4,826 8,430 6,953 9,514 10,416 6,846 7,352 9,466 13,237 7,740 7,971 26,749 2,930 2,268 6,356 140,090 Long-term liabilities Long-term loan 0 Other 2,666 558 2,718 2,676 6,202 1,435 501 1,681 5,636 826 24,899 Total long-term liabilities 2,666 0 558 0 2,718 0 2,676 6,202 1,435 0 501 1,681 5,636 0 826 0 24,899 Total liabilities 11,702 4,826 8,988 6,953 12,232 10,416 9,522 13,554 10,901 13,237 8,241 9,652 32,385 2,930 3,094 6,356 164,989 Net assets Unrestricted Unappropriated 2,101 4,715 4,777 3,070 2,674 4,124 2,857 7,177 4,001 6,177 4,374 4,227 8,681 866 3,266 (1,285) 61,802 Appropriated 11,239 3,003 14,320 4,109 7,874 1,285 8,544 18,421 3,807 13,066 25,375 3,256 19,698 807 2,697 2,525 140,026 Restricted 0 Permanently 0 Temporarily 286 747 1,033 Total net assets 13,626 7,718 19,097 7,179 11,295 5,409 11,401 25,598 7,808 19,243 29,749 7,483 28,379 1,673 5,963 1,240 202,861 Total liabilities/net assets 25,328 12,544 28,085 14,132 23,527 15,825 20,923 39,152 18,709 32,480 37,990 17,135 60,764 4,603 9,057 7,596 367,850 Ratios/indicators Current ratio 1.63 2.15 1.63 1.55 2.01 1.47 1.25 3.52 1.32 1.91 2.39 1.90 1.44 1.40 2.85 0.80 1.74 Working capital – in U.S. dollars 5,717 5,540 5,335 3,824 9,656 4,899 1,691 18,519 3,000 12,097 10,770 7,194 11,644 1,159 4,197 (1,285) 103,958 Working capital – in days 71 160 50 69 151 172 30 290 52 147 148 122 130 52 172 (50) 112 Operating fund – in days 26 137 45 55 42 145 50 112 69 75 60 72 97 39 134 (50) 67 78 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A4.2 CAPITAL INVESTMENTS BY CENTERS, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 CIAT 1.0 2.4 3.1 1.5 1.3 CIFOR 0.7 1.2 0.6 0.5 0.6 CIMMYT 3.0 1.1 1.6 1.5 1.4 CIP 0.8 0.5 1.1 0.6 1.6 ICARDA 2.8 2.6 1.1 1.2 1.1 ICLARM 0.5 1.5 0.9 0.3 0.2 ICRAF 0.5 0.0 7.4 1.1 0.4 ICRISAT 4.4 1.4 0.1 1.6 1.6 IFPRI 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 IITA 2.9 3.6 2.0 3.0 1.8 ILRI 3.2 1.4 1.6 2.1 1.4 IPGRI 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.5 IRRI 1.6 1.8 3.0 2.5 1.5 ISNAR 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 IWMI 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 WARDA 0.5 1.1 2.0 0.9 0.7 Total 24.4 20.3 25.7 18.0 14.9 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 4 79 TABLE A5.1 CGIAR TOTAL INVESTMENTS, 1972–2000 (millions of current U.S. dollars and percentages) 1972–76 1977–81 1982–86 1987–91 1992–96 1997–2000 TOTAL $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % $ % Center CIAT 31 15% 75 12% 116 11% 158 11% 172 10% 127.0 9% 679 11% CIFOR 26 2% 47.0 3% 73 1% CIMMYT 42 21% 81 13% 118 12% 163 11% 153 9% 137.7 10% 694 11% CIP 12 6% 37 6% 60 6% 100 7% 116 7% 89.3 7% 414 7% ICARDA 1 0.5% 52 8% 101 10% 117 8% 111 7% 97.4 7% 479 8% ICLARM 35 2% 41.7 3% 77 1% ICRAF 78 5% 85.8 6% 164 3% ICRISAT 20 10% 69 11% 117 11% 191 13% 159 10% 94.8 7% 651 10% IFPRI 8 1% 28 3% 51 4% 69 4% 79.1 6% 235 4% IITA 41 20% 92 15% 151 15% 178 12% 174 10% 124.1 9% 759 12% ILRI 14 7% 84 14% 119 12% 167 12% 134 8% 107.4 8% 625 10% IPGRI 1 0.5% 12 2% 21 2% 34 2% 82 5% 82.4 6% 232 4% IRRI 40 20% 94 15% 138 14% 181 13% 207 12% 130.0 10% 789 13% ISNAR 3 0.5% 22 2% 43 3% 54 3% 38.2 3% 160 3% IWMI 46 3% 36.3 3% 82 1% WARDA 2 1% 13 2% 29 3% 40 3% 47 3% 39.5 3% 171 3% TOTAL 204 100% 617 100% 1,021 100% 1,422 100% 1,663 100% 1,358 100% 6,284 100% Undertaking1 Productivity 151 74% 433 70% 648 63% 893 63% 757 46% 496 37% 3,377 54% Environment 13 6% 56 9% 93 9% 98 7% 245 15% 250 18% 755 12% Biodiversity 1 0.5% 15 2% 33 3% 55 4% 140 8% 144 11% 388 6% Policy 7 1% 27 3% 38 3% 172 10% 172 13% 416 7% NARS 40 19% 106 17% 220 22% 338 24% 349 21% 296 22% 1,348 21% TOTAL 204 100% 617 100% 1,021 100% 1,422 100% 1,663 100% 1,358 100% 6,284 100% Commodity sector2 Cereals 114 56% 274 46% 465 49% 626 48% 601 42% 448 39% 2,528 45% Rice 51 25% 126 21% 210 22% 269 21% 283 20% 207 18% 1,146 20% Wheat 22 11% 65 11% 105 11% 127 10% 120 8% 92 8% 531 9% Maize 28 14% 51 9% 82 9% 123 9% 114 8% 80 7% 478 8% Legumes 31 15% 111 19% 170 18% 221 17% 191 13% 161 14% 885 16% Roots and tubers 29 14% 82 14% 128 13% 198 15% 229 16% 172 15% 839 15% Bananas/plantains 61 4% 34 3% 95 2% Production Sectors 174 86% 467 79% 763 80% 1,045 81% 1,082 75% 815 71% 4,346 77% Livestock 29 14% 126 21% 187 20% 250 19% 222 15% 149 13% 964 17% Trees 101 7% 138 12% 239 4% Fish 35 2% 46 4% 81 1% TOTAL 204 100% 594 100% 949 100% 1,295 100% 1,440 100% 1,148 100% 5,630 100% Region Sub-Saharan Africa 86 42% 272 44% 449 44% 603 42% 656 39% 558 40% 2,623 42% Asia 70 34% 178 29% 285 28% 417 29% 537 32% 433 31% 1,919 30% Latin America and the Caribbean 39 19% 96 16% 155 15% 221 16% 277 17% 232 17% 1,019 16% West Asia and North Africa 9 4% 71 12% 134 13% 182 13% 192 12% 136 10% 723 12% TOTAL 204 100% 617 100% 1,021 100% 1,423 100% 1,662 100% 1,358 100% 6,284 100% Object Personnel 87 43% 312 51% 564 55% 778 55% 900 54% 676 50% 3,316 53% Supplies/services 58 28% 183 30% 302 30% 423 30% 540 32% 509 37% 2,015 32% Travel 11 5% 35 6% 70 7% 106 7% 110 7% 97 7% 429 7% Capital/depreciation 48 24% 87 14% 85 8% 116 8% 112 7% 76 6% 524 8% TOTAL 204 100% 617 100% 1,021 100% 1,423 100% 1,662 100% 1,358 100% 6,284 100% Note: Non-agenda investments are assumed to be in the same proportions as agenda investments. Values include all overhead costs. 1 Certain assumptions were made to calculate values in environment and biodiversity undertakings from 1972 to 1991. 2 The total for commodities is lower than in the other categories since not all Centers have commodity activity. 80 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A5.2 CGIAR TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND SOURCES OF REVENUE, 1991–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 1991 U R 1992 U R 1993 U R 1994 U R 1995 U R 1996 U R 1997 U R 1998 U R 1999 U R 2000 U R CIAT 34.1 25.2 8.9 32.2 23.8 8.4 33.3 25.5 7.8 35.1 25.4 9.7 34.6 23.0 11.6 36.8 24.5 12.3 33.3 20.6 12.7 33.5 19.0 14.5 30.7 16.3 14.4 29.5 13.2 16.3 CIFOR 2.4 2.4 4.8 4.5 0.3 8.9 7.2 1.7 9.7 7.1 2.6 10.6 8.5 2.1 11.1 7.2 3.9 12.7 8.6 4.1 12.6 7.2 5.4 CIMMYT 34.4 23.5 10.9 33.7 24.9 8.8 32.8 23.8 9.0 29.0 20.7 8.3 27.1 16.9 10.2 30.2 18.2 12.0 30.4 19.4 11.0 32.2 18.8 13.4 37.4 18.7 18.7 39.0 15.5 23.5 CIP 23.6 17.7 5.9 21.7 14.7 7.0 21.5 13.1 8.4 22.4 13.5 8.9 24.0 13.4 10.6 26.1 12.9 13.2 25.5 15.1 10.4 21.7 13.1 8.6 21.6 12.9 8.7 20.2 10.6 9.6 ICARDA 22.0 18.1 3.9 20.6 16.3 4.3 21.2 17.2 4.0 22.7 16.0 6.7 23.4 16.1 7.3 23.2 12.1 11.1 27.6 16.0 11.6 23.6 12.2 11.4 22.8 11.8 11.0 23.4 10.6 12.8 ICLARM 6.1 1.3 4.8 7.2 3.1 4.1 6.5 2.7 3.8 7.1 3.6 3.5 8.6 4.0 4.6 8.5 5.1 3.4 10.4 6.6 3.8 12.4 7.2 5.2 10.4 5.1 5.3 ICRAF 13.1 5.5 7.6 13.8 6.0 7.8 16.7 5.2 11.5 16.8 7.3 9.5 17.4 7.4 10.0 22.2 9.1 13.1 21.1 9.5 11.6 21.8 8.9 12.9 20.7 7.3 13.4 ICRISAT 36.5 23.0 13.5 32.9 18.9 14.0 31.8 20.9 10.9 29.6 20.3 9.3 33.4 26.1 7.3 31.1 22.1 9.0 27.5 20.4 7.1 21.8 15.4 6.4 23.2 15.4 7.8 23.3 13.8 9.5 IFPRI 13.5 6.7 6.8 13.4 7.1 6.3 12.5 6.9 5.6 13.1 6.7 6.4 13.8 8.5 5.3 16.2 8.5 7.7 18.1 9.3 8.8 18.6 8.7 9.9 20.1 8.2 11.9 21.2 9.1 12.1 IITA 34.3 20.0 14.3 35.7 19.4 16.3 34.3 19.0 15.3 33.8 20.1 13.7 33.2 21.2 12.0 37.2 24.2 13.0 31.9 18.1 13.8 29.4 16.1 13.3 32.7 17.9 14.8 30.1 16.7 13.4 ILRI 35.0 28.9 6.1 32.9 28.4 4.5 26.0 22.4 3.6 23.9 18.9 5.0 25.7 21.7 4.0 25.9 21.0 4.9 26.7 20.9 5.8 27.7 21.5 6.3 26.5 14.8 11.7 26.5 16.2 10.3 IPGRI 8.1 7.2 0.9 12.3 10.8 1.5 13.6 10.3 3.3 16.3 8.5 7.8 19.6 12.9 6.7 20.0 12.1 7.9 19.6 12.6 7.0 21.7 13.9 7.9 20.4 12.6 7.8 21.5 10.7 10.8 IRRI 38.7 25.9 12.8 41.7 24.7 17.0 44.8 23.2 21.6 40.0 24.3 15.7 40.3 25.5 14.8 40.0 25.1 14.9 35.0 23.6 11.4 35.0 23.4 11.6 35.1 22.3 12.8 32.6 17.5 15.1 ISNAR 10.8 7.8 3.0 10.7 6.6 4.1 10.4 6.1 4.3 10.5 6.3 4.2 11.5 6.3 5.2 11.2 5.7 5.5 10.4 7.6 2.8 9.9 7.6 2.3 9.7 7.1 2.6 8.2 4.9 3.3 IWMI 9.1 3.0 6.1 8.9 3.1 5.8 8.8 4.4 4.4 9.4 3.6 5.8 10.2 4.9 5.3 10.1 5.3 4.8 9.2 4.8 4.4 8.8 6.0 2.8 8.9 5.4 3.5 WARDA 13.7 12.1 1.6 10.1 5.2 4.9 9.1 4.7 4.4 8.7 4.1 4.6 9.2 4.0 5.2 9.8 6.2 3.6 9.2 5.5 3.7 9.9 5.1 4.8 10.9 6.7 4.2 9.4 6.5 2.9 Total 305 216 89 326 211 116 323 208 116 322 202 120 338 217 121 354 216 138 347 217 130 337 203 134 347 195 151 338 171 167 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 5 81 TABLE A6.1 CGIAR PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 304 320 340 330 331 (of which percent unrestricted) 68% 64% 61% 54% 50% Center earned income 14 13 13 11 14 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 28 14 0 0 0 Advance/draw on reserves 5 Total 346 346 353 340 350 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 112 141 148 126 128 Pacific Rim 43 40 44 48 44 North America 44 51 52 52 54 Developing countries 8 11 13 15 14 International and regional organizations 85 63 61 66 66 Foundations 6 6 7 6 7 Non-Members 5 7 12 15 19 Total 304 320 340 330 331 Top three contributors World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank Japan United States United States Japan United States United States Japan Japan United States Japan Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 897 862 893 907 873 Support staff 9,416 8,016 7,458 7,721 7,642 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 40% 40% 37% 34% 36% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 18% 19% 18% 18% 18% Protecting the environment 17% 17% 19% 20% 18% Saving biodiversity 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% Improving policies 12% 11% 12% 13% 14% Strengthening NARS 21% 21% 21% 23% 22% (of which training) 8% 8% 8% 9% 9% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 326 333 337 347 338 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 53% 51% 50% 50% 49% Supplies/services 34% 36% 37% 38% 39% Travel 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Depreciation 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 39% 41% 41% 42% 42% Asia 33% 30% 32% 32% 32% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 17% 17% 18% 17% 17% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 12% 12% 10% 9% 9% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 45.0 43.0 51.5 44.0 61.8 Appropriated net assets 277.0 272.8 271.4 219.2 141.1 Annual Center cost change (percent) 4.5% 2.6% 1.0% 0.2% 0.3% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 105 114 127 122 112 Current ratio 1.53 1.72 1.80 1.63 1.74 Longer-term sustainability indicator Unappropriated net assets/revenue (percent) 13% 13% 15% 13% 18% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 25.0 21.7 22.2 17.9 14.9 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 127% 105% 110% 100% 93% 82 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.2 CIAT PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 31.1 31.7 32.1 28.7 29.2 (of which percent unrestricted) 66% 60% 55% 50% Center earned income 2.1 1.6 0.9 0.6 1.0 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) Advance/draw on reserves 0.6 Total 33.2 33.3 33.0 29.3 30.7 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 11.0 12.3 13.4 10.0 10.2 Pacific Rim 4.6 4.1 4.4 5.0 4.2 North America 5.0 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.4 Developing countries 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.3 International and regional organizations 6.8 6.0 4.4 4.4 5.4 Foundations 1.1 1.1 1.2 0.5 0.7 Non-Members 0.6 1.1 1.5 1.4 2.0 Total 31.1 31.7 32.1 28.7 29.2 Top three contributors World Bank World Bank Japan Japan Japan Japan Japan World Bank World Bank World Bank United States United States United States United States United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 76 60 64 62 58 Support staff 650 678 639 610 638 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 42% 44% 43% 41% 42% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 30% 30% 28% 27% 26% Protecting the environment 16% 17% 21% 22% 23% Saving biodiversity 17% 15% 13% 13% 15% Improving policies 4% 4% 5% 7% 5% Strengthening NARS 21% 19% 18% 17% 16% (of which training) 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 36.9 33.3 33.5 30.7 29.6 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 66% 60% 53% 52% 52% Supplies/services 25% 28% 36% 36% 36% Travel 5% 6% 7% 8% 7% Depreciation 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 16% 23% 22% 23% 23% Asia 12% 8% 8% 10% 12% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 71% 67% 68% 66% 63% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 0.7 4.1 4.2 2.8 2.1 Capital fund balance, Dec. 31 22.2 19.9 19.4 19.3 11.5 Annual Center cost change (percent)) 4.7% 4.4% (0.2%) (2.9%) (1.9%) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 33 52 40 19 71 Current ratio 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.6 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund / revenue (percent) 2% 12% 13% 10% 7% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 1.0 2.4 3.0 2.7 1.3 Capital expenditure / depreciation (percent) 60% 131% 214% 183% 108% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 83 TABLE A6.3 CIFOR PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 8.7 10.6 11.3 11.5 12.2 (of which percent unrestricted) 82% 80% 65% 64% 55% Center earned income 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 0.3 Advance/draw on reserves 0.3 Total 9.4 11.0 11.7 11.9 12.9 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 4.4 4.9 6.1 4.7 6.2 Pacific Rim 2.1 2.5 2.1 2.6 1.6 North America 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.1 1.0 Developing countries 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 International and regional organizations 0.6 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.2 Foundations 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Non-Members 0.3 0.8 0.9 Total 8.7 10.6 11.3 11.5 12.2 Top three contributors Japan Japan Japan Japan Japan European Commission European Commission European Commission World Bank World Bank United States United States World Bank Netherlands Netherlands Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 32 31 31 30 37 Support staff 78 64 74 86 118 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 22% 25% 23% 24% 25% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Protecting the environment 34% 33% 35% 35% 30% Saving biodiversity 16% 16% 13% 13% 13% Improving policies 18% 20% 21% 21% 22% Strengthening NARS 10% 6% 8% 6% 10% (of which training) 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 9.4 10.6 10.6 12.7 12.6 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 44% 42% 42% 44% 46% Supplies/services 46% 48% 47% 46% 44% Travel 6% 6% 7% 6% 6% Depreciation 4% 5% 5% 4% 5% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 25% 27% 28% 29% 30% Asia 46% 41% 39% 37% 37% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 29% 32% 33% 34% 34% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 4.5 4.6 5.3 4.5 4.7 Appropriated net assets 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.7 3.0 Annual Center cost change (percent) 2.8% (1.2%) (5.7%) 11.6% 2.0% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 249 199 210 147 160 Current ratio 2.7 2.7 2.5 1.9 2.2 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent)) 48% 42% 45% 38% 37% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.7 1.2 0.6 1.0 0.6 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 187% 240% 126% 200% 100% 84 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.4 CIMMYT PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 27.4 28.6 30.1 33.8 37.5 (of which percent unrestricted) 66% 62% 55% 45% 37% Center earned income 1.9 1.8 1.4 0.4 1.3 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 1.6 Advance/draw on reserves 0.4 Total 30.9 30.4 31.5 34.2 39.2 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 8.3 9.8 9.7 10.2 10.7 Pacific Rim 3.5 3.3 3.6 4.4 4.4 North America 5.8 6.2 6.5 6.4 6.7 Developing countries 0.7 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.1 International and regional organizations 8.3 6.3 6.7 6.7 7.1 Foundations 0.7 0.8 1.1 0.8 1.2 Non-Members 0.2 0.6 1.0 3.5 5.2 Total 27.4 28.6 30.1 33.8 37.5 Top three contributors World Bank United States United States United States United States United States World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank Japan European Commission European Commission Japan Japan Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 82 81 88 86 86 Support staff 669 746 744 746 795 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 34% 36% 36% 36% 37% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 25% 29% 29% 29% 29% Protecting the environment 27% 20% 19% 19% 19% Saving biodiversity 12% 13% 14% 14% 14% Improving policies 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Strengthening NARS 23% 27% 27% 27% 26% (of which training) 9% 14% 14% 14% 14% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 28.8 30.4 32.2 36.1 39.1 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 50% 54% 52% 52% 52% Supplies/services 36% 35% 37% 39% 39% Travel 8% 7% 7% 5% 6% Depreciation 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 21% 32% 32% 36% 37% Asia 37% 32% 32% 30% 28% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 27% 26% 26% 24% 25% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 15% 10% 10% 10% 10% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 8.5 8.1 7.4 5.0 4.8 Appropriated net assets 13.8 13.8 14.0 14.3 14.3 Annual Center cost change (percent) 8.6% 9.3% 1.0% 7.0% 6.4% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 103 99 84 48 50 Current ratio 1.5 3.0 2.5 1.5 1.6 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 27% 27% 23% 15% 13% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 3.0 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.4 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 190% 79% 94% 93% 100% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 85 TABLE A6.5 CIP PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 22.7 22.6 22.2 20.0 19.9 (of which percent unrestricted) 56% 57% 61% 56% 52% Center earned income 0.2 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.6 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 1.5 0.8 Advance/draw on reserves 0.6 Total 24.4 24.8 22.6 20.3 21.0 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 14.0 14.4 13.9 10.4 10.41 Pacific Rim 2.0 1.5 1.8 2.1 1.86 North America 2.0 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.08 Developing countries 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.51 International and regional organizations 4.1 3.8 3.1 4.2 3.63 Foundations 0.2 0.1 0.08 Non-Members 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.32 Total 22.7 22.6 22.2 20.0 19.9 Top three contributors Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland European Commission World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank Germany United States United States United States United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 63 64 62 64 58 Support staff 576 519 477 607 529 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 50% 43% 43% 40% 59% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 17% 25% 25% 24% 34% Protecting the environment 15% 26% 26% 25% 0% Saving biodiversity 15% 9% 9% 10% 15% Improving policies 7% 5% 5% 7% 9% Strengthening NARS 12% 17% 17% 17% 16% (of which training) 7% 6% 6% 5% 0% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 24.6 24.7 21.7 22.7 20.2 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 47% 46% 48% 48% 44% Supplies/services 41% 42% 42% 41% 48% Travel 9% 9% 7% 8% 6% Depreciation 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 16% 18% 18% 18% 18% Asia 49% 51% 51% 51% 51% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 28% 26% 26% 26% 26% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 1.1 1.1 1.5 0.2 3.1 Appropriated net assets 12.2 12.2 12.4 12.4 4.1 Annual Center cost change (percent) 3.9% 3.5% 1.7% (0.4%) 2.5% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 58 57 66 35 69 Current ratio 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.6 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 4% 4% 7% 1% 15% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.8 0.5 1.2 1.1 1.6 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 114% 78% 188% 154% 320% 86 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.6 ICARDA PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 21.1 22.0 25.2 19.5 22.1 (of which percent unrestricted) 55% 48% 55% 44% 42% Center earned income 1.3 0.4 1.2 0.8 1.1 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 0.6 Advance/draw on reserves 0.5 Total 23.0 22.5 26.4 20.4 23.7 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 10.8 10.6 9.9 6.6 8.01 Pacific Rim 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.14 North America 1.7 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.07 Developing countries 1.3 1.8 2.5 2.8 2.39 International and regional organizations 6.1 5.2 8.1 5.5 7.21 Foundations 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.08 Non-Members 0.2 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.22 Total 21.1 22.0 25.2 19.5 22.1 Top three contributors World Bank European Commission World Bank World Bank World Bank European Commission World Bank European Commission Arab Fund Arab Fund Netherlands Germany United States United States United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 85 76 83 92 94 Support staff 395 390 323 330 330 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 43% 50% 47% 41% 41% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 22% 24% 22% 21% 18% Protecting the environment 16% 16% 20% 22% 22% Saving biodiversity 10% 11% 13% 15% 17% Improving policies 4% 5% 5% 5% 6% Strengthening NARS 26% 19% 16% 17% 14% (of which training) 4% 6% 4% 5% 3% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 23.1 27.6 23.6 22.7 23.4 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 40% 38% 37% 42% 38% Supplies/services 41% 43% 46% 43% 46% Travel 9% 10% 9% 10% 11% Depreciation 10% 9% 8% 5% 5% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 0% 0% 15% 15% 15% Asia 1% 1% 12% 12% 12% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 98% 98% 71% 70% 71% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 3.8 (0.8) 0.6 (1.2) 2.7 Appropriated net assets 30.2 30.4 30.6 12.0 8.6 Annual Center cost change (percent) 4.6% 2.6% 1.3% 1.1% 0.1% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 154 107 159 147 151 Current ratio 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.7 2.0 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 17% (4%) 2% (6%) 11% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 2.8 2.6 1.4 1.1 1.1 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 122% 109% 70% 91% 92% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 87 TABLE A6.7 ICLARM PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 9.5 8.8 10.6 14.2 12.0 (of which percent unrestricted) 62% 63% 65% 63% 56% Center earned income 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 0.2 Advance/draw on reserves 0.3 Total 10.1 9.0 10.9 14.4 12.8 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 4.3 4.40 5.4 5.2 4.43 Pacific Rim 0.8 0.79 1.0 1.4 1.52 North America 0.8 0.85 0.9 1.3 2.13 Developing countries 0.8 0.43 0.5 0.5 0.43 International and regional organizations 2.3 2.04 2.6 5.5 3.13 Foundations 0.3 0.16 0.3 0.0 0.09 Non-Members 0.2 0.14 0.1 0.4 0.27 Total 9.5 8.8 10.6 14.2 12.0 Top three contributors World Bank European Commission European Commission World Bank World Bank Netherlands World Bank Denmark European Commission European Commission Denmark Denmark World Bank United States United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 21 27 30 30 24 Support staff 207 179 261 291 225 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 38% 36% 33% 26% 45% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 13% 20% 19% 12% 10% Protecting the environment 17% 17% 18% 38% 25% Saving biodiversity 7% 16% 10% 1% 1% Improving policies 16% 16% 19% 15% 13% Strengthening NARS 22% 16% 20% 19% 15% (of which training) 1% 2% 8% 7% 6% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 8.7 8.6 10.4 12.3 10.4 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 47% 58% 50% 45% 44% Supplies/services 42% 29% 37% 46% 47% Travel 9% 9% 11% 7% 9% Depreciation 2% 4% 2% 2% 0% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 6% 30% 30% 30% 31% Asia 89% 62% 62% 58% 58% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 2% 3% 3% 4% 4% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 3% 5% 5% 8% 8% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 0.7 1.6 1.5 1.9 4.1 Appropriated net assets 2.5 4.3 5.2 1.3 1.3 Annual Center cost change (percent) 4.1% 0.2% (4.6%) 4.7% (0.9%) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 50 104 88 74 172 Current ratio 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.5 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 7% 17% 14% 13% 32% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.5 1.5 1.2 0.0 0.2 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 250% 510% 479% 0% 513% 88 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.8 ICRAF PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 17.4 21.8 20.4 20.6 21.4 (of which percent unrestricted) 42% 40% 43% 38% 37% Center earned income 0.7 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.8 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 0.7 Advance/draw on reserves 0.1 Total 18.8 22.2 21.3 21.3 22.4 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 8.5 11.5 11.6 10.3 11.33 Pacific Rim 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.26 North America 2.9 3.4 3.2 3.7 3.55 Developing countries 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.15 International and regional organizations 3.1 3.9 2.8 4.0 4.02 Foundations 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.49 Non-Members 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 Total 17.4 21.8 20.4 20.6 21.4 Top three contributors Canada Canada Canada Canada Canada Sweden Denmark World Bank Sweden Sweden World Bank World Bank Netherlands Netherlands Netherlands Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 53 50 56 52 47 Support staff 355 256 313 305 258 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 48% 58% 40% 33% 29% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 7% 7% 4% 5% 5% Protecting the environment 14% 12% 18% 23% 23% Saving biodiversity 8% 7% 9% 4% 4% Improving policies 11% 9% 11% 15% 17% Strengthening NARS 19% 14% 22% 25% 28% (of which training) 8% 9% 17% 17% 20% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 17.3 22.2 21.1 21.8 20.8 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 61% 50% 58% 53% 54% Supplies/services 28% 39% 26% 31% 31% Travel 6% 5% 9% 11% 11% Depreciation 5% 6% 7% 5% 5% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 80% 76% 81% 79% 76% Asia 12% 17% 12% 14% 17% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 9% 7% 7% 7% 7% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 0.3 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.9 Appropriated net assets 6.0 8.4 8.5 8.3 8.5 Annual Center cost change (percent) 5.1% 4.1% 2.4% (1.8%) (0.9%) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 51 39 79 79 30 Current ratio 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.3 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 2% 7% 8% 8% 13% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.5 1.3 1.9 0.8 0.4 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 63% 101% 129% 72% 40% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 89 TABLE A6.9 ICRISAT PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 27.5 26.9 26.5 21.2 21.3 (of which percent unrestricted) 82% 76% 76% 63% 56% Center earned income 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.7 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 4.1 0.8 Advance/draw on reserves 0.6 Total 32.3 28.6 27.7 22.6 23.5 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 11.0 9.4 9.5 7.5 8.11 Pacific Rim 4.7 3.7 3.9 4.3 3.39 North America 5.0 4.6 4.6 4.1 4.31 Developing countries 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.45 International and regional organizations 6.0 7.9 7.1 4.0 4.07 Foundations 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.27 Non-Members 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.67 Total 27.5 26.9 26.5 21.2 21.3 Top three contributors World Bank World Bank World Bank Japan Japan Japan United States United States United States United States United States Japan Japan World Bank World Bank Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 84 62 55 59 52 Support staff 1,787 1,273 1,039 1,155 1,120 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 52% 54% 43% 41% 44% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 31% 33% 25% 25% 27% Protecting the environment 19% 12% 17% 17% 14% Saving biodiversity 7% 7% 15% 13% 10% Improving policies 7% 6% 4% 11% 15% Strengthening NARS 16% 21% 20% 18% 18% (of which training) 7% 8% 10% 10% 10% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 28.8 26.7 21.8 22.9 23.2 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 55% 56% 54% 54% 54% Supplies/services 32% 30% 31% 35% 33% Travel 5% 4% 3% 4% 7% Depreciation 9% 10% 12% 7% 6% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 49% 49% 50% 47% 50% Asia 50% 50% 49% 49% 48% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 0% 0% 1% 2% 1% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 1% 0% 1% 2% 1% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 0.6 (0.4) 5.4 4.4 7.2 Appropriated net assets 54.3 48.6 48.3 20.2 18.4 Annual Center cost change (percent) 2.4% (0.4%) 1.1% 10.0% (1.1%) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 101 152 313 291 290 Current ratio 1.6 2.1 3.3 2.7 3.5 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 2% (2%) 20% 20% 31% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 4.4 1.1 0.5 1.2 1.6 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 176% 39% 19% 75% 114% 90 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.10 IFPRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 16.0 18.2 20.1 20.8 21.4 (of which percent unrestricted) 52% 52% 51% 43% 43% Center earned income 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 4.1 Advance/draw on reserves 0.1 Total 20.4 18.4 20.4 21.4 22.3 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 5.0 6.1 8.1 7.4 7.63 Pacific Rim 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.4 1.92 North America 3.8 5.1 5.6 5.1 3.7 Developing countries 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.3 1.32 International and regional organizations 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.2 4.04 Foundations 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.56 Non-Members 1.5 1.2 1.1 2.0 2.22 Total 16.0 18.2 20.1 20.8 21.4 Top three contributors United States United States United States United States United States Japan Denmark Denmark World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank Denmark Denmark Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 41 45 43 44 52 Support staff 82 81 75 83 90 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Protecting the environment 0% 9% 6% 5% 10% Saving biodiversity 0% 2% 2% 1% 0% Improving policies 88% 62% 59% 55% 61% Strengthening NARS 12% 27% 33% 39% 29% (of which training) 6% 14% 11% 16% 15% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 16.2 18.1 18.6 21.2 21.3 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 48% 48% 50% 50% 47% Supplies/services 40% 43% 41% 41% 44% Travel 10% 8% 8% 8% 7% Depreciation 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 43% 45% 46% 47% 50% Asia 27% 26% 26% 25% 26% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 20% 19% 20% 20% 17% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 10% 10% 8% 8% 7% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.6 4.0 Appropriated net assets 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 3.8 Annual Center cost change (percent) 5.3% 3.1% 1.6% 2.2% 3.1% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 90 70 113 132 52 Current ratio 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.3 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 13% 17% 15% 17% 18% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 100% 76% 199% 116% 67% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 91 TABLE A6.11 IITA PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 22.4 25.9 29.2 30.7 29.4 (of which percent unrestricted) 81% 66% 55% 52% 54% Center earned income 1.0 1.5 0.8 1.7 0.9 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 9.2 4.1 Advance/draw on reserves Total 32.6 31.5 30.0 32.4 30.3 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 9.5 10.8 11.6 11.4 8.13 Pacific Rim 4.3 3.4 3.9 4.5 3.83 North America 4.2 6.1 7.3 7.4 9.2 Developing countries 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.6 1.12 International and regional organizations 4.0 4.9 3.6 4.2 4.95 Foundations 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.64 Non-Members 0.0 0.2 2.0 1.0 1.53 Total 22.4 25.9 29.2 30.7 29.4 Top three contributors Japan United States United States United States United States World Bank World Bank Japan Japan Japan United States Japan World Bank World Bank World Bank Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 96 86 78 79 83 Support staff 1,659 1,466 1,250 1,090 1,043 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 51% 56% 56% 47% 50% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 24% 26% 27% 28% 26% Protecting the environment 18% 17% 17% 14% 15% Saving biodiversity 4% 3% 4% 6% 4% Improving policies 4% 4% 4% 6% 9% Strengthening NARS 23% 20% 19% 27% 23% (of which training) 4% 6% 6% 8% 5% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 28.5 28.5 29.4 32.7 30.1 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 51% 50% 47% 48% 46% Supplies/services 30% 31% 36% 38% 40% Travel 5% 6% 6% 5% 6% Depreciation 13% 12% 10% 9% 8% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% Asia 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 5.4 5.5 6.2 6.0 6.2 Appropriated net assets 35.3 35.5 35.7 35.7 13.1 Annual Center cost change (percent) 8.6% 5.5% 4.2% (14.5%) (4.1%) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 117 95 131 125 147 Current ratio 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 17% 18% 21% 19% 20% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 2.9 3.1 2.0 2.3 1.8 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 83% 91% 63% 76% 75% 92 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.12 ILRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 24.8 26.0 24.4 26.6 23.0 (of which percent unrestricted) 80% 75% 75% 56% 55% Center earned income 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.8 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) Advance/draw on reserves 0.1 Total 26.0 27.0 25.8 28.0 24.9 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 12.5 13.2 12.5 12.1 10.96 Pacific Rim 2.0 2.2 1.8 2.2 1.86 North America 3.6 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.17 Developing countries 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.17 International and regional organizations 6.6 6.1 5.1 6.1 4.45 Foundations 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.1 1.07 Non-Members 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.29 Total 24.8 26.0 24.4 26.6 23.0 Top three contributors World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank United States United States United States United States United States Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 79 61 76 76 67 Support staff 800 746 719 725 746 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 63% 60% 61% 57% 47% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 2% 2% 3% 8% 7% Protecting the environment 5% 13% 12% 12% 23% Saving biodiversity 9% 8% 9% 7% 5% Improving policies 5% 5% 5% 9% 10% Strengthening NARS 18% 14% 13% 15% 15% (of which training) 3% 5% 4% 6% 6% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 26.0 26.7 27.7 26.5 26.5 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 54% 54% 50% 48% 50% Supplies / services 32% 34% 38% 38% 36% Travel 4% 4% 4% 5% 6% Depreciation 9% 8% 8% 8% 8% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 78% 80% 67% 67% 67% Asia 14% 17% 20% 20% 21% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 8% 3% 11% 11% 10% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 7.0 6.2 3.9 5.4 4.4 Appropriated net assets 26.0 26.1 26.0 24.1 25.4 Annual Center cost change (percent) 2.3% 2.9% 2.9% (1.5%) 0.4% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 158 151 126 156 148 Current ratio 2.6 2.3 1.9 2.0 2.4 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 27% 23% 15% 19% 18% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 3.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.4 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 139% 64% 73% 86% 70% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 93 TABLE A6.13 IPGRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 16.4 18.8 21.2 20.1 22.3 (of which percent unrestricted) 77% 67% 63% 61% 52% Center earned income 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.6 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 5.3 0.9 Advance/draw on reserves 0.4 Total 22.1 20.2 21.6 20.3 23.3 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 10.3 11.3 12.3 10.4 11.8 Pacific Rim 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.25 North America 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.17 Developing countries 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.83 International and regional organizations 2.3 3.3 4.3 4.3 4.73 Foundations 0.0 0.04 Non-Members 0.4 1.0 1.3 1.49 Total 16.4 18.8 21.2 20.1 22.3 Top three contributors Japan World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank Belgium European Commission Japan Japan Switzerland Japan Belgium Belgium Belgium Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 41 41 43 46 46 Support staff 86 109 108 112 143 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 14% 14% 16% 17% 17% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 14% 12% 13% 13% 13% Protecting the environment 7% 6% 7% 7% 8% Saving biodiversity 45% 45% 39% 37% 37% Improving policies 13% 12% 13% 14% 13% Strengthening NARS 22% 23% 25% 26% 25% (of which training) (4%) 6% 8% 8% 7% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 16.5 18.6 21.7 20.6 21.5 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 48% 47% 43% 44% 44% Supplies/services 43% 45% 48% 46% 47% Travel 8% 7% 7% 8% 7% Depreciation 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 27% 27% 26% 27% 28% Asia 27% 27% 26% 27% 27% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 25% 23% 21% 23% 23% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 20% 23% 27% 23% 22% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 3.3 3.9 3.7 2.2 4.2 Appropriated net assets 2.0 2.0 2.2 3.0 3.3 Annual Center cost change (percent) 4.3% 0.9% 0.8% (2.1%) 0.8% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 89 81 96 100 122 Current ratio 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.3 1.9 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 15% 19% 17% 11% 18% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 650% 240% 85% 75% 125% 94 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.14 IRRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 28.7 28.6 34.8 32.5 33.3 (of which percent unrestricted) 87% 84% 67% 61% 55% Center earned income 2.7 1.8 3.2 1.4 1.6 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 17.9 6.8 Advance/draw on reserves 0.5 Total 49.3 37.2 38.0 33.9 35.4 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 8.8 8.8 11.6 9.0 10.81 Pacific Rim 9.2 9.1 10.7 11.4 10.47 North America 3.7 4.2 4.7 4.7 4.81 Developing countries 0.7 0.9 1.6 1.2 1.1 International and regional organizations 5.9 5.2 4.8 5.1 4.9 Foundations 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.03 Non-Members 0.5 0.2 0.19 Total 28.7 28.6 34.8 32.5 33.3 Top three contributors Japan Japan Japan Japan Japan World Bank World Bank United States United States United States United States United States World Bank World Bank World Bank Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 64 82 94 82 79 Support staff 1,374 830 835 960 997 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 48% 44% 39% 36% 41% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 29% 29% 26% 22% 30% Protecting the environment 20% 22% 30% 28% 22% Saving biodiversity 7% 8% 8% 9% 7% Improving policies 8% 7% 9% 11% 12% Strengthening NARS 17% 19% 15% 16% 19% (of which training) 4% 5% 4% 4% 8% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 30.4 28.2 35.0 34.2 32.6 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 59% 48% 47% 47% 46% Supplies/services 30% 38% 39% 39% 39% Travel 5% 6% 7% 7% 8% Depreciation 7% 8% 8% 7% 7% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% Asia 94% 92% 93% 92% 92% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 0.8 2.4 5.0 4.8 8.7 Appropriated net assets 49.7 48.6 45.7 48.1 19.7 Annual Center cost change (percent) 4.2% (1.5%) (7.7%) 5.5% 0.4% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 180 237 249 253 130 Current ratio 1.4 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.4 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 2% 7% 13% 14% 25% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 1.6 2.8 5.8 1.0 1.5 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 73% 123% 223% 40% 68% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 95 TABLE A6.15 ISNAR PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 10.7 9.9 9.6 8.2 8.5 (of which percent unrestricted) 57% 72% 76% 69% 62% Center earned income 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 4.9 Advance/draw on reserves 0.3 Total 15.9 10.2 9.9 8.4 8.9 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 5.1 5.6 5.1 4.4 3.95 Pacific Rim 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 North America 1.7 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.98 Developing countries 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.14 International and regional organizations 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.2 1.86 Foundations 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Non-Members 1.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.76 Total 10.7 9.9 9.6 8.2 8.5 Top three contributors Netherlands Netherlands World Bank Netherlands Netherlands World Bank World Bank Netherlands Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland Switzerland European Commission World Bank World Bank Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 38 53 46 45 32 Support staff 53 35 38 40 35 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Protecting the environment 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Saving biodiversity 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Improving policies 26% 39% 48% 39% 15% Strengthening NARS 74% 61% 52% 61% 85% (of which training) 15% 18% 21% 20% 28% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 11.3 10.4 9.9 9.7 8.2 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 57% 57% 62% 60% 56% Supplies/services 28% 33% 29% 31% 32% Travel 14% 9% 8% 7% 10% Depreciation 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 54% 48% 34% 33% 38% Asia 12% 17% 15% 23% 27% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 23% 25% 41% 29% 29% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 11% 10% 10% 15% 6% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 2.0 1.8 1.3 0.1 0.9 Appropriated net assets 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Annual Center cost change (percent) (0.5%) (5.7%) 1.2% 2.1% 0.0% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 80 79 62 22 52 Current ratio 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.1 1.4 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 13% 18% 13% 1% 10% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 100% 138% 200% 50% 200% 96 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.16 IWMI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 9.0 9.5 9.4 8.8 8.6 (of which percent unrestricted) 60% 54% 54% 68% 59% Center earned income 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 3.0 0.5 Advance/draw on reserves 0.2 Total 12.2 10.2 9.6 9.0 9.2 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 3.5 3.7 4.2 2.9 2.84 Pacific Rim 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.27 North America 0.9 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.05 Developing countries 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.35 International and regional organizations 2.2 1.4 1.1 2.8 2.05 Foundations 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.18 Non-Members 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.84 Total 9.0 9.5 9.4 8.8 8.6 Top three contributors Germany United States Japan World Bank World Bank Netherlands World Bank Netherlands Japan Japan World Bank Netherlands United States Sweden Sweden Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 22 22 22 25 26 Support staff 305 344 238 226 211 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% Protecting the environment 48% 48% 49% 42% 40% Saving biodiversity 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Improving policies 24% 24% 24% 32% 35% Strengthening NARS 27% 27% 27% 26% 25% (of which training) (11%) 0% 0% 0% 12% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 9.2 9.6 9.2 8.8 8.9 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 64% 63% 67% 64% 62% Supplies/services 22% 25% 20% 20% 21% Travel 10% 8% 10% 12% 11% Depreciation 4% 4% 4% 4% 6% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 11% 5% 5% 6% 8% Asia 87% 76% 76% 75% 81% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 3% 14% 10% 10% 4% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 0% 5% 9% 9% 7% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 2.8 2.8 2.1 2.3 3.3 Appropriated net assets 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.2 2.7 Annual Center cost change (percent) 5.1% 2.0% 0.7% 0.1% 0.8% Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 140 168 187 205 172 Current ratio 2.5 3.1 2.8 2.1 2.9 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 23% 27% 22% 26% 36% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 175% 161% 74% 94% 60% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 97 TABLE A6.17 WARDA PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 ACTUAL 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 8.7 8.6 10.5 10.8 8.5 (of which percent unrestricted) 58% 57% 54% 61% 72% Center earned income 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 1.6 Advance/draw on reserves Total 10.8 8.9 10.6 11.1 8.8 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 3.9 3.9 3.4 3.5 2.71 Pacific Rim 1.6 1.5 2.5 2.1 1.76 North America 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.14 Developing countries 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.1 International and regional organizations 1.4 1.4 1.6 3.1 1.84 Foundations 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.18 Non-Members 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.78 Total 8.7 8.6 10.5 10.8 8.5 Top three contributors Japan Japan Japan World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank World Bank Japan Japan Netherlands Netherlands Canada Netherlands Netherlands Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff 20 21 22 35 30 Support staff 340 300 325 355 364 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 49% 32% 36% 37% 31% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 16% 20% 23% 23% 16% Protecting the environment 16% 25% 17% 18% 21% Saving biodiversity 3% 5% 7% 7% 5% Improving policies 8% 11% 9% 9% 11% Strengthening NARS 23% 27% 30% 28% 32% (of which training) (6%) 7% 15% 14% 12% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 9.9 9.2 9.9 11.0 9.4 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel 50% 50% 57% 53% 46% Supplies/services 38% 34% 29% 33% 38% Travel 5% 9% 7% 6% 5% Depreciation 7% 8% 8% 8% 11% Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Asia 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% West Asia and North Africa (WANA) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Center financial information Unappropriated net assets 0.8 (0.5) (0.5) (0.1) (1.3) Appropriated net assets 12.8 13.8 15.0 13.7 2.5 Annual Center cost change (percent) 19.2% (1.7%) 2.6% (0.1%) (3.2%) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) 28 3 (23) (31) (50) Current ratio 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.8 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 7% (6%) (5%) (1%) (15%) Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 1.1 1.1 0.6 2.7 0.7 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 183% 157% 75% 300% 70% 98 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH