* 2 1268 OCIAL DEVELOPMENT NOTES ENVIRONMENTALLY AND SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT NETWORK Note No. 44 December 1998 Social Assessment Identifies Land Management Concerns in Cote d'Ivoire Rural areas in Cote d'Ivoire account for 55 percent of Several basic steps were followed in carrying out the the total population. Rural people rely heavily on SA. First, the social space where different actors export- and food-crop production as their primary articulate their claims and defend their rights to land source of livelihood. However, 71 percent of the rural and other land-based resources was conceptually population live below the poverty line. A general lack determined. Second, key stakeholders and vulnerable of new initiatives and investment opportunities has populations were identified and associated with provoked an upsurge in rural-urban migration, reported patterns of land conflicts. Next, an especially among youth. Prevailing constraints are institutional analysis was conducted to assess the further aggravated when delivery and support regulatory framework and the organizational systems do not exist or are distorted by bureaucratic structure required for devolution of power to local and cultural determinants. State intervention in rural stakeholders and effective management of rural areas has led to a crisis in the local and traditional infrastructure. This note captures the findings of the modes of governance and created an acute situation of provisional SA process at the project identification rural dependency. stage and raises a number of new issues that need to The Government of Cote d'Ivoire (GOCI) and the be addressed through the SA process during the pre- World Bank agree that access to land and natural appraisal, appraisal, and implementation stages. resource management are critical factors in coping Key Social Development Concerns with the rural crisis. The GOCI invited the Bank to help meet the rural development challenge through a The key social development concerns identified by new project, the Rural Land Management and the SA were access, control, and management of land Infrastructure Project (PNGTER). The project was rights. The SA also assessed the potential for an designed as one component of a nationwide eruption of conflict when indigenous landlords decentralization program, and it seeks to suggest new attempt to dispossess migrants of their access rights to approachesforlziocl presogra, and agtsemeksntosuggest n land, or when landlords discover that the latter approaches for local resource management occupy more land than was provided in the initial Social Assessment grant. The SA assumed that clarification of land rights The social assessment (SA) aimed to: (a) identify the will secure tenure rights and thus lead to better land social development concerns and stakeholders management, eventually producing greater long-term relevant to the project; (b) undertake an institutional investment in land. However, this land clarification analysis that examines the regulatory and process will also gradually transform customary land- organizational framework; and (c) define a tenure laws. participation framework for stakeholders in the Under customary principles of tenure, land cannot identification, design, and implementation of local be alienated by sale. Consequently there is no local development plans. institutional framework for land transmission This note was prepared by Cyprian Fisiy and Deborah Youssef of the World Bank. For more information on the social assessment, contact Cyprian Fisiy, The World Bank, 1818 H St, NW, Washington DC, 20433, USA, Fax: 202-473-7913, E- mail: cfisiyEworldbank.org. To view other Social Development Notes on social assessment, please visit the World Bank's website at: http://www.worldbank.org, and click on the "Social Assessment" section in 'Development Topics." Tire viezvs expressed in this note are those of thze autlhor(s) and do not necessarily reflect thje official policies of the World Bank. through market mechanisms. The state land-delivery social capital in rural areas and integrate the urban mechanism, based on the land registration process elite in development planning. The next steps of the for a title deed, is out of reach for most peasants. SA should include a further definition of the Local land transactions are therefore not supported framework of participation for key stakeholders. by any legal document. Moreover, if the certification Specifically, it is strongly recommended that a of use rights to land has to take the form of titling, willingness/ability to pay study be conducted in then some of the major stakeholders - specifically some pilot cases. The anticipated output should migrants from Mali and Burkina Faso - will be losers, provide an empirical base for establishing the as the state is reticent to give land titles to foreigners. eligibility criteria for rural funds (FRAR) available The distinction between the nontransmissibility of from the project to finance rural infrastructure land through market instruments and the ability to proposals from local communities. sell use rights in the forest is another important Next Steps concern, and affects the mode of institutionalization The next ste in the SA rocess should be to assess of these rights. The SA raised the question of how The poli p m the curprent regi e to effess best to proceed with land registration once land use the political will of the current regime to effectively rights are clarified. It found that since access rights to decentralize decisionmaking powers and land and other productive resources are usually management prerogatives to local decentralized recorded inother narodctivemale head of household bodies. This political will could be assessed by (a) recorded in the name of the male past o useholl determining the willingness of the regime to deliver women, youth, and nomadic pastoralasts may fal village/collective land titles to the newly created through the cracks of the system if a land titling rural decentralized communities, to be administered approach is adopted. by the rural councils; (b) putting in place mechanisms Institutional Issues and regulations that allow local communities to Two levels of institutional issues are relevant to the participate in the design, implementation, and maintenance of local investments; and (c) creating SA. At the micro level, the SA provdesappropriate devery systems to finance and provide time of the institutional arrangements for land, which technical support to local communities. Furthermore, are constantly evolving. It recognizes existing to enhance the effectiveness of the rural funding patterns of land management, and represents a key mechanism as a vehicle to finance rural development transitional phase that records existing rights to projects in the context of the project, it is land, and might facilitate the movement from recommended that a willingness/ability to pay study communal ownership with individual use rights to be conducted in some pilot cases. the recognition of individual occupation. At the conmmunity level, rural councils are expected to play a To further enhance local ownership of the project, a pivotal role in articulating the framework of rural more detailed stakeholder analysis should be development planning as a result of decentralization. conducted to establish some of the systemic and The extent to which these new institutions can ensure cultural factors that account for the vulnerability of the project's development agenda depends on the certain groups (especially women and youth). In acceptance of a mapping of rural villages into addition, to provide a strong institutional and decentralized local communities and the internal organizational framework for the project, an level of coherence and ability of the units to design organization and manpower study should be and take full ownership of development initiatives at conducted to determine (a) the new organizational the local level. framework required to enable rural communities to become effective in development planning and Participation Framework implementation; (b) the skills-mix needed to carry out Defining the participation framework for the their mission, and (c) institutional arrangements proposed project requires two steps. First, providing linking these rural communities to other higher levels local communities with the required skills to of the state structure. participate actively in the design of their local Finally, a framework for monitoring and evaluation development plans and to ensure their should be prepared. This will require developing implementation; and second, establishing a differentsets of idicators to monitor variations in committed technical unit to back up the planning dholding perf indica tor andother exercise at the local level. It is also clear from a process indicators, as well as the establishment of linkage analysis that to enhance the project's local orgainiational units to record changes to development effectiveness, the participation local or onal rits tore cheseeare framework should capitalize on existing networks of existing property rights before these are systemnatically reported to a registry office. Social Development Notes are published informally by the Social Development Family in the Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Network of the World B'ank. For additional copies, contact Social Development Publications, The World Bank, 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, Fax: 202-522-3247, E-mail: sdpublications@worldbank.org. @3 Prited on Recycled Paper