56051 v2 May 2010 Mapping the resilience of international river basins to future cliMate change-induced water variability APPENDICES Lucia De Stefano James Duncan Shlomi Dinar Kerstin Stahl Kenneth Strzepek Aaron T. Wolf Disclaimer This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail pubrights@worldbank.org. authors and affiliations Lucia DeStefano – Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University James Duncan – Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University Shlomi Dinar – Institute of Advanced Studies, Durham University Kerstin Stahl – Institute of Hydrology, University of Freiburg Kenneth Strzepek – College of Engineering, University of Colorado Aaron T. Wolf – Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University acknowledgeMents Thanks are owed to a number of colleagues who are responsible for the compilation and assessment of the immense amount of data on which this report is based. First and foremost, Prof. Ariel Dinar and Dr. Vahid Alavian were instrumental in crafting the structure and framework of the analysis. Michael Jacobsen has been infinitely patient and creative, for which we are grateful. The data included here exists due to the tremendous efforts of, and close collaboration with, a number of partners. Dr. Andrea Gerlak, Susanne Schmeier, and Dr. Marloes Bakker. Each was responsible for compilations and categorizations of the River Basin Organization data—we are thankful for their generous contributions. The OSU treaty database was vastly updated and improved thanks to close collaboration with the International Water Management Institute (IWMI); we are grateful to Dr. Mark Giordano and his colleagues Alena Drieschova and Dr. Jonathan Lautze for their efforts, as we are to Prof. Shlomi Dinar for contributing his collection as well. The design of our methodology likewise benefited from this collaboration with IWMI, as well as with Prof. Itay Fischhendler. A host of OSU and guest students contributed a vast amount of time and energy, including Stephanie Ogden, Yoshiko Sano, Amy McNally, Olivia Odom, Patrick MacQuarrie, Carolyn Jackson, Jehan Jabareen, and Geoff King. We are especially grateful to Kendra Hatcher, manager of TFDD, for her infinite expertise with data manipulation and visualization. Lynette de Silva, director of the OSU Program in Water Conflict Management, was a magician in keeping all of this activity on track, as ever. Approving Manager: Julia Bucknall, Sector Manager, ETWWA The main paper “Mapping the Resilience of International River Basins to Future Climate Change-Induced Water Variability� is available online at http://www.worldbank.org/water. iii foreword Transboundary watercourses pose a variety of challenges to the management of water resources. Basin-wide management approaches often clash with state sovereignty. Efforts in cooperatively managing shared water resources are therefore of great importance for the sustainable management of transboundary river and lake basins. The World Bank has long been engaged in transboundary water resources management starting with the support to the establishment of the Indus Treaty signed between India and Pakistan in 1960 and followed by numerous other important initiatives and projects on transboundary watercourses. Climate change adds new challenges to the management of water resources. Increased hydrological variability will have a significant impact on all dimensions of water use and water management, including greater uncertainty and an increase in extreme events such as floods and droughts. The World Bank has therefore commissioned the authors of this report to investigate the specific interactions between transboundary water resources management and climate change. This aims at increasing our knowledge of exposure to climate change-induced variability across different river and lake basins and resilience of the institutions established to co-operatively manage shared water resources. Such an understanding is a prerequisite for proper design of future specific measures to adapt cooperative water resources management to future challenges in a changing and uncertain climate. The results of the report reveal significant differences in institutional resilience to climate change- induced water variability across transboundary basins, with some basins being fairly resilient to climate change on all five dimensions identified as decisive for climate change resilience while others, especially in EAP and LCR, face a range of challenges. While water treaties and RBOs are relatively common in transboundary river basins, specific variability management mechanisms are often lacking. Moreover, several CBUs have been identified in which high hydrological exposure and a lack of adaptation mechanisms fall together, indicating a particular risk of climate change- induced challenges and calling for policy action. Some basins with particularly high probability of water stress have been identified for further study. In addition, several issues have been identified that merit further research. These include a more detailed study of climate change forecast than applied in the study, especially with regard to intra- annual variability and the different indices of changes, more case-specific analysis of water treaties and RBOs taking into account the specific institutional components influencing resilience, and the inclusion of contextual non-treaty determinants influencing cooperation between riparian states and thus resilience. Based on this, the World Bank will continue its contribution to the study of the link between transboundary water resources management and climate change in the future, contributing to the sustainable management of transboundary waters. Julia Bucknall Sector Manager, ETWWA iv v Appendix 1 - Categotries of treaty analysis This appendix lists the relevant categories of analysis used to define the attributes of each treaty in relation to selected criteria. The table below gives the criteria in the first column, a brief description of the overall category in the second column and the specific content items that each treaty could have in the last column. These categories and content items are more detailed than those used in our analysis, but are listed in Appendix 2 to demonstrate what attributes yielded particular scores and the type of data available in the TFDD for future work. Treaty coding category Category description Attributes Document ID A unique numerical code identifying each document in the database. N.A. The full formal name of the document or best approximation thereof. The place of Document name signature is often included as part of the treaty name. For non-English language documents, the title is translated to English. Not all title translations are official. N.A. This field refers to the date on which the document was signed. If such information is unavailable, the next choice is the date of entry into force, followed by the date of Date signed ratification. If the document is a series of letters written on different dates, the latest date is used and the range of dates included may be mentioned as part of the title of the document. Dates are represented in a month/day/year format. N.A. 1 – Not a treaty: The document is not a treaty signed by the respective parties. 2 - Semi-international treaty: The treaty has not been concluded between sovereign states, for example an agreement between one state and an international organization or an agreement between a provincial government and a state. 3 – Does not fit TFDD inclusion criteria: the treaty does not deal with water as a consumable resource. 4 - Primary Agreement: The first water treaty signed between the parties about a particular issue area. 5 - Replacement of a Primary Agreement: Replaces a previously signed water agreement on the same issue area. Type Categorization of treaty type 6 - Amendment to a Primary Agreement: Amends parts of a previously signed water agreement on the same issue area. 7 - Protocol to a primary agreement: A treaty adding further aspects to an already signed water treaty and potentially modifying parts of the original treaty. 8 - Financial agreement related to international waters: A treaty dealing exclusively with the financing of particular aspects related to water management, not with water itself (and thus not part of core TFDD collection). 9- Missing. Appendix 1 - Categories of treaty analysis A1-1 Treaty coding category Category description Attributes 10-Available but not translated to English. 11-Available but not coded. 0 – Not Available/Not Coded. 1 – Global: an agreement potentially open to any country but without reference to specific basins (e.g. 1997 UN Convention). 2 – Regional: an agreement potentially open to any country in a defined region but without reference to specific basins (e.g. SADC Protocol). Geographic Scope The geographic extent of the treaty 3 - All waters of two or more countries: an agreement covering all waters shared between two or more contiguous states but generally without reference to specific basins. 4 - entire named basin(s): an agreement covering the entire hydrologic area of one or more specifically named basins. 5 - Sub-basin(s) or other specified area(s): an agreement covering only a part of one or more specifically named or implied basins. 1 - Not mentioned.W,H,P. 2 - Fixed quantities.W,H,P 3 - Fixed quantities, variable ( by water availability). W,H,P 4- Fixed quantities, recoupable (in later periods if not met). W,H,P 5 - Percentage of flow. W,H,P 6 - Prior approval (e.g. in case one party requires a higher water use than was usual up to date for example because of the construction of an irrigation Mechanisms for allocating water in different categories. These categories are Water system, it has to seek the consent of the other party). W,H,P Quantity (W superscript), Hydropower (H superscript) and Pollution (P superscript), 7 - Allocation of entire rivers. W,H,P Allocation with the superscript indicating which categories those types of allocation will appear. In 8 - Consultation. W,H,P cases where an allocation mechanism was not identified or the category was unclear, a fourth category, Universal, was used. 9 - Fixed quantities and percentage. W,H,P 11 - Prioritization of uses(e.g. domestic use first, hydropower second...). W,H,P 12 - Fixed quantities vary according to time of the year. W 13 - Allocating time. W 14 - Unclear. W,H,P 15 - Allocation present but type not determined by previous analysis. W,H,P 16 - Allocation of places.H -1 – Not Available/Not Coded. 0 - None. Appendix 1 - Categories of treaty analysis A1-2 Treaty coding category Category description Attributes 1 - Flood control: an agreement which refers to the control of flooding. Variability management Mechanisms that address management of exteme events or variability in water supply. 2 - Dry season control: an agreement which refers to water management to offset low season flow reductions. 3 - Both: an agreement which refers to both flood and dry season control. -1 – Not Available/Not Coded. 0 – None. 1 – Commission: an installed commission or one created for that purpose composed exclusively of representatives from the parties concerned is supposed to deal with disputes. 2 - Diplomatic Channels: The parties agree to solve disputes in consultations The mechanism(s) specified in the document to address disagreements among the through diplomatic channels. Conflict resolution signatories 3 – Arbitration: an independent arbitrational tribunal is supposed to decide about disputes, the decisions are final and binding. 4 - Third party involvement: Third parties help to facilitate consultations between the parties, but they have no power to confer any judgments. 5 –Permanent Judicial Organ: referring to Permanent Judicial Organ to settle international dispute. Appendix 1 - Categories of treaty analysis A1-3 Appendix 2 - Treaty data and scoring This appendix lists every treaty in the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database. The countries listed are the original signatories, not the territorial treaty application countries. All basins that the treaty is applied to are listed. In addition to the title of the agreement and the date it was signed, the mechanisms evaluated in this study and the score each treaty received for these mechanisms are listed. Document type and geographic scope were used to determine whether a treaty was a water treaty by the definition used in this report. The specific mechanisms for allocation, variability management and conflict resolution are listed, as well as the score. Additional information on these fields can be found in the main text. Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhine Netherlands Schelde Treaty of Limits Between France and the Netherlands concluded at 3/28/1820 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Courtray Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N specified coded Coded ot Coded area(s) 2 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848 established borders between 2/2/1848 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 United States of America and Mexico stipulating international Agreement or other border along the Rio Grande specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels 3 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Rhine Germany Convention between the delegates of the riparian states of Lake 8/31/1857 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Constance: Bade, Bavaria, Austria, Switzerland and Wurtemberg, Agreement or other concerning the regulation of the flow of water of Lake Constance specified near Constance area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-1 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 4 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Austria Danube Germany Agreement between Austria and Bavaria on the Inn River 1/1/1858 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 5 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ethiopia Unknown France Convention between France and the Danakils, for the Cession of 3/11/1862 Semi- Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Obock and its Territory to France. Paris, 11 March, 1862 international Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N treaty Coded coded Coded ot Coded 6 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Germany Treaty between Austria and Bavaria concerning the regime of the 6/24/1862 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 frontier line and other territorial relations between Bohemia and Agreement or other Available/Not Bavaria specified Coded area(s) 7 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Rhine Netherlands Treaty for the regulation of water withdrawal from the Meuse, 5/12/1863 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 followed by an explanatory note, signed at the Hague Agreement or other Quantity quantities, specified variable ( by area(s) water availability) 8 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Douro/Duero Spain Mino Tagus/Tejo Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-2 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty of limits between Portugal and Spain 9/29/1864 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Not 0 Agreement or other Quantity present but Available/Not Available/N specified type not Coded ot Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 9 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Bidasoa Spain Ebro Garonne Treaty of delimitation between France and Spain, signed at 5/26/1866 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocating 1 None 0 None 0 Bayonne Agreement or other Quantity time specified area(s) Allocation of entire rivers Prioritization of uses 10 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Douro/Duero Spain Mino Tagus/Tejo Regulations annexed to the boundary treaty between Spain and 11/4/1866 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 Portugal of 29th September, 1864, signed at Lisbon primary or other Quantity of flow agreement specified area(s) 11 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Vistula/Wista Russia A treaty regarding navigation and hydraulic works along the rivers 5/27/1871 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Diplomatic 1 Vistula and San [no title available] Agreement or other Channels specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-3 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 12 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Rhine Netherlands Convention for the modification of article 6 of the Treaty of 12 1/1/1873 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 May 1863, regulating water withdrawal from the Meuse, followed to a Primary or other Quantity quantities by a declaration Agreement specified area(s) 13 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Indus United Kingdom Terms of agreement between Great Britain and the States of 2/18/1873 Semi- Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 Patiala, Jind, and Nabha regarding the Sirhind Canal international Available/Not Available/Not Available/N treaty Coded Coded ot Coded 14 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Congo/Zaire Belgium Niger Denmark France Germany Italy Netherlands Portugal Russia Spain Sweden Turkey United Kingdom United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-4 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism General act of the conference of Berlin … Respecting: 1) freedom 2/26/1885 Does not fit Entire named 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 of trade in the basin of the Congo; 2) the slave trade; 3) neutrality TFDD basin(s) Available/Not of the territories in the basin of the Congo; 4) navigation of the inclusion Coded Congo; 5) navigation of the Niger; and 6) rules for f criteria 15 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna United Kingdom Agreement between the British Government and The State of Jind, 4/29/1875 Semi- Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 For Regulating the Supply of Water for Irrigation from the Western international Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Jumna Canal treaty Coded coded Coded ot Coded 16 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Switzerland Convention between Switzerland, te Great Duke of Bade and 5/18/1887 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Alsace and Lorraine for the regulation of fishery in the waters of Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N the Rhine River and its tributaries, including Lake Constance Coded coded Coded ot Coded 17 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Unknown United Kingdom Exchange of Notes with regard to the Somali Coast. London, 2/9/1888 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 February 2 and 9, 1888 Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N specified coded Coded ot Coded area(s) 18 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Costa Rica San Juan Nicaragua Award of the President of the United States on the validity of the 3/22/1888 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 treaty of limits of 15 April 1858 between Costa Rica and Nicaragua international or other Quantity present but Available/Not Channels treaty specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-5 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 19 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Boundary Convention between the United States of America and 3/1/1889 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Mexico Agreement or other specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels 20 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Gambia United Kingdom Agreement between Great Britain and France 8/10/1889 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation of 1 Not 0 None 0 Agreement or other Quantity entire rivers Available/Not specified Coded area(s) 21 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Germany Rhine Switzerland Agreement concerning the Hydropower station at Rheinfelden 1/1/1890 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 between Germany and Swizterland Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 22 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Italy Nile United Kingdom Protocol between Great Britain and Italy for the demarcation of 4/15/1891 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 their respective spheres of influence in Eastern Africa Agreement or other specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-6 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 23 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Zambezi United Kingdom Treaty between Great Britain and Portugal, defining their 6/11/1891 Does not fit Sub-basin(s) 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 respective spheres of influence in Africa TFDD or other Available/Not inclusion specified Coded criteria area(s) Commission 24 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Rhine Hungary Treaty between Switzerland and Austria-Hungary for the 12/30/1892 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 straightening of the Rhine from the mouth of the Ill until Lake Agreement or other Constance specified area(s) Commission 25 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Indus United Kingdom Amended terms of agreement between the British Government 9/16/1892 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 and the State of Jind, for regulating the supply of water for international or other Quantity present but Available/Not irrigation from the Western Jumana Canal treaty specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 26 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Great Scarcies United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-7 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange of notes between France and Great Britain respecting 2/4/1895 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Prioritization 1 Both flood 1 None 0 navigation and use of the Great Scarcies River primary or other Quantity of uses and dry agreement specified season control area(s) 27 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Boundary Convention between the United States of America and 10/1/1895 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Mexico, extending the Convention of 1 March 1889 primary or other agreement specified area(s) 28 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Boundary Convention between the United States of America and 11/6/1896 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Mexico, extending the Convention of 1 March 1889 primary or other agreement specified area(s) 30 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Boundary Convention between the United States of America and 10/29/1897 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Mexico, extending the Convention of 1 March 1889 primary or other agreement specified area(s) 31 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Boundary Convention between the United States of America and 12/2/1898 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Mexico, extending the Convention of 1 March 1889 primary or other agreement specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-8 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 32 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Boundary Convention between the United States of America and 12/22/1899 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Mexico, extending the Convention of 1 March 1889 primary or other agreement specified area(s) 33 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Unknown Spain Convention entre La France et L’Espagne Pour La Délimitation des 6/27/1900 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Possessions Françaises et Espagnoles sur La Côte du Sahara et sur Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N La Côte du Golfe de Guinée. Paris, 27 June, 1900 Coded coded Coded ot Coded 34 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Boundary Convention between the United States of America and 11/21/1900 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Mexico, extending the Convention of 1 March 1889 primary or other agreement specified area(s) 35 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ethiopia Nile United Kingdom Exchange of notes between Great Britain and Ethiopia 3/18/1902 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 Agreement or other Quantity present but Available/Not specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 36 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ethiopia Nile United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-9 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaties between Great Britain and Ethiopia, relative to the 5/15/1902 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 frontiers between Anglo-Egyptian Soudan, Ethiopia, and Erythroea Agreement basin(s) (Railway to connect Soudan with Uganda) 37 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Volta United Kingdom Exchange of notes between France and Great Britain relative to 4/25/1904 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the boundary between the Gold Coast and French Sudan Agreement or other specified area(s) 38 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Unknown United Kingdom Echange de Notes Constituant un Accord Entre La France et le 5/15/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Royaume-Uni Pour Fixer La Frontiiere entre La Cote D'Or Et La Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Cote D'ivoire. London, 11 and 15 May, 1905 Coded coded Coded ot Coded 39 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Norway Glama Sweden Klaralven Torne/Tornealven Treaties and conventions concerning the dissolution of the 10/26/1905 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Swedish-Norwegian union Agreement two or more Available/Not countries Coded Diplomatic Channels 40 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Congo, Democratic Republic of ( Nile United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-10 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between Great Britain and the Independent State of 5/9/1906 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Permanent 1 the Congo, modifying the agreement signed at Brussels 12 May to a Primary or other Judicial 1894, relating to the spheres of influence of Great Britain and the Agreement specified Organ Independent State of the Congo in East and Central Africa area(s) 41 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Rio Grande (North America) United States of America Convention between Mexico and the United States for the 5/21/1906 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 distribution of waters of Rio Grande Agreement or other Quantity quantities specified and area(s) percentage 42 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Niger United Kingdom Oueme Volta Agreement between France and Great Britain relative to the 10/19/1906 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 frontier between French and British possessions from the Gulf of Agreement or other Guinea to the Niger specified area(s) 43 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Nile Italy United Kingdom Agreement between Great Britain, France, and Italy respecting 12/13/1906 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Abyssinia Agreement or other specified area(s) 44 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ethiopia Juba-Shibeli United Kingdom Lake Turkana Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-11 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between Great Britain and Ethiopia relative to the 12/6/1907 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Frontiers between British East Africa, Uganda and Ethiopia. Addis Agreement or other Ababa, 6 December, 1907 specified area(s) 45 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) United Kingdom Alsek United States of America Chilkat Columbia Firth Fraser Mississippi Nelson-Saskatchewan Skagit St. Croix St. John (North America) St. Lawrence Stikine Taku Whiting Yukon Treaty Between Great Britain and the United States relating to 1/11/1909 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 boundary waters and boundary questions Agreement or other Quantity quantities specified and area(s) percentage Commission Prioritization Arbitration of uses Commission Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-12 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 46 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Uruguay Protocol between Uruguay and Argentina dealing with the 1/5/1910 Primary Entire named 1 Water Unclear 1 None 0 None 0 questions of the jurisdiction of the River Plate, signed at Agreement basin(s) Quantity Montevideo 47 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) United Kingdom Groundwater Yemen Convention regarding the water supply of Aden between Great 4/11/1910 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Britain and the Sultan of Abdali Agreement or other specified area(s) 48 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Rhine France Proces-verbal of delimitation between Belgium and France, signed 7/20/1910 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 at Pussemange TFDD Available/Not Available/Not inclusion Coded Coded criteria 49 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Moa United Kingdom Agreement between Great Britain and France respecting the 9/4/1913 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 boundary between Sierra Leone and French Guinea Agreement or other specified area(s) 50 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Unknown Spain Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-13 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange Of Notes Constituting An Agreement Between Spain And 9/2/1912 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Portugal On The Exploitation Of Border Rivers For Industrial Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Purposes Coded coded Coded ot Coded 51 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna United Kingdom Agreement between Great Britain and the Panna state respecting 9/30/1908 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 the Ken Canal international or other Available/Not treaty specified Coded area(s) 52 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention between France and Switzerland for the management 10/4/1913 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 of the hydraulic power of the Rhone between the planned factory Agreement or other r of La Plaine and a point to be determined upstream of the bridge specified of Pougny-Chancy area(s) 53 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Roia Italy Convention between France and Italy relating to the utilization of 12/17/1914 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 the water of the river Roya and its tributaries Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) 54 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Ili/Kunes He Russia Protocol between China and Russia for the delimitation of the 6/12/1915 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 frontier along the River Horgos Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-14 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 55 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Maroni Netherlands Convention between France and the Netherlands to fix the 9/30/1915 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 boundary between Suriname and French Guiana, signed at Paris Agreement or other specified area(s) 56 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lithuania Daugava Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Neman Peace treaty between Lithuania and the Russian Socialist Federal 7/12/1920 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 Republic, and protocol Agreement two or more Available/Not countries Coded 57 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Latvia Daugava Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Narva Neman Treaty of peace between Latvia and Russia 8/11/1920 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement or other specified area(s) 58 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Jordan United Kingdom Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Franco-British convention on certain points connected with the 12/23/1920 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 mandates for Syria and the Lebanon, Palestine and Mesopotamia Agreement basin(s) Available/Not Coded 59 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Unknown Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-15 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty of Friendship between Persia and the Russian Socialist 2/26/1921 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Federal Republic Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 60 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Czech Republic Slovakia Convention between the Austrian and Czechoslovak Republics 3/10/1921 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 concerning the delimitation of the frontier between Austria and Agreement or other Available/Not Czechoslovakia and various questions connected therewith specified Coded area(s) 61 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Poland Dniester Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Treaty of peace between Poland, Russia and Ukraine 3/18/1921 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement or other specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-16 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 62 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Albania General Austria Belgium Bolivia Brazil Bulgaria Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Greece Guatemala Haiti Honduras India Iran Italy Japan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-17 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Norway Panama Paraguay Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom Uruguay Venezuela Yugoslavia (Former) International Convention Concerning the Regime of Navigable 4/20/1921 Primary Global 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 Waterways of International Concern Agreement Available/Not Available/N Coded ot Coded 63 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Danube Croatia Czech Republic France Greece Italy Romania Serbia Slovakia Slovenia United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-18 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention instituting the definitive statute of the Danube 7/23/1921 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 Agreement basin(s) Permanent Judicial Organ 64 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Afghanistan Indus United Kingdom Treaty between the government of Afghanistan and His Britannic 11/22/1921 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Unclear 1 Not 0 None 0 Majesty's Government for the establishment of neighbourly Agreement or other Quantity Available/Not relations specified Coded area(s) 65 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Elbe Czech Republic France Germany Italy Slovakia United Kingdom Convention instituting the statute of navigation of the Elbe 2/22/1922 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Agreement basin(s) Commission 66 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Czech Republic Elbe Germany Slovakia Agreement concerning the posts of secretary-general and assistant 2/22/1922 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 secretary-general of the International Elbe Commission primary basin(s) agreement Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-19 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 67 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Denmark Unknown Germany Agreement between Denmark and Germany relating to 4/10/1922 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 watercourses and dikes on the German-Danish frontier, together Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N with a final protocol and instructions for the Frontier Water Coded coded Coded ot Coded Commission and the Supreme Frontier Water Commission, attached as annex to the T 68 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Kemi Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Olanga Pasvik Vuoksa Convention between the Republic of Finland and the Russian 10/28/1922 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Socialist Federal Soviet Republic concerning the maintenance of Agreement or other river channels and the regulation of fishing on water courses specified forming part of the frontier between Finland and Russia area(s) 69 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Elbe Czech Republic France Germany Italy Slovakia United Kingdom Convention supplementary to the statute of navigation of the Elbe 1/27/1923 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 TFDD Available/Not Available/Not inclusion Coded Coded criteria Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-20 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 70 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Jordan United Kingdom Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the British 3/7/1923 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Commission 1 and French governments respecting the boundary line between Agreement or other Quantity present but Available/Not Syria and Palestine from the Mediterranean to El Hamme specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 71 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Convention relative a l'amenagement des forces Hydrauliques 12/9/1923 Primary Global 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 interessant plusieurs etats et protocole de signature Agreement available/not Available/Not Available/N coded Coded ot Coded 72 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Unknown United Kingdom Exchange of Notes between the United Kingdom and France 1/21/1924 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 agreeing to the ratification of the protocol defining the boundary Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N between French Equatorial Africa and the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. specified coded Coded ot Coded London, 21 January, 1924 area(s) 73 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Rhine Switzerland Treaty between the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of 11/19/1924 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 Austria for the straightening of the Rhine from the mouth of the Ill primary or other until Lake Constance agreement specified area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-21 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of 11/19/1924 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Third Party 1 Austria for the straightening of the Rhine from the mouth of the Ill primary or other Involvemen until Lake Constance agreement specified t area(s) 74 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Unknown United Kingdom Exchange of Letters between Egypt and the U.K. 26 January, 1925 1/26/1925 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 75 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Italy Unknown Treaty between the Holy See and Italy establishing the Vatican 2/11/1929 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Unclear 1 Not 0 Not 0 state, signed at Rome Agreement or other Quantity Available/Not Available/N specified Coded ot Coded area(s) 76 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Pasvik Norway Convention between Norway and Finland concerning the 2/14/1925 Primary Entire named 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 Diplomatic 1 international legal regime of the waters of the Pasvik (Paatsjoki) Agreement basin(s) Quantity of flow Channels and the Jakobselv (Vuoremajoki) Permanent Judicial Organ 77 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) United Kingdom St. Lawrence United States of America Agreement between the United States of America and Canada to 2/24/1925 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Commission 1 regulate the level of Lake of the Woods and accompanying Agreement or other and dry protocol specified season control area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-22 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 78 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Italy Gash United Kingdom Exchange of notes between the United Kingdom and Italy 6/15/1925 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 respecting the regulation of the utilisation of the waters of the Agreement or other Quantity quantities River Gash specified area(s) 79 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Unknown Italy Agreement fixing the frontier between Cyrenaica and Egypt. Cairo, 12/6/1925 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 6 December, 1925 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 80 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Nile United Kingdom Exchange of notes between the United Kingdom and Italy 12/20/1925 Primary Entire named 1 Water Prioritization 1 Dry Season 1 None 0 respecting concessions for a barrage at Lake Tsana and a railway Agreement basin(s) Quantity of uses Control across Abyssinia from Eritrea to Italian Somaliland 81 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Germany Danube Poland Elbe Oder/Odra Treaty between Germany and Poland for the settlement of 1/27/1926 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Commission 1 frontier questions primary or other Quantity present but Available/Not agreement specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 82 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Jordan United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-23 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement of good neighbourly relations concluded between the 2/2/1926 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 British and French governments on behalf of the territories of Agreement two or more Palestine, on the one part, and on behalf of Syria and Great countries Lebanon, on the other part Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 83 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Congo/Zaire United Kingdom Exchange of notes accepting the protocol relative to the 5/17/1926 Does not fit Sub-basin(s) 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Tanganyika-Ruanda-Urundi Frontier TFDD or other available/not Available/Not Available/N inclusion specified coded Coded ot Coded criteria area(s) 84 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Kunene South Africa Agreement between South Africa and Portugal regulating the use 7/1/1926 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 of the water of the Cunene River Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) 85 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Congo/Zaire Portugal Convention between Belgium and Portugal regarding various 7/20/1927 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 Not 0 Arbitration 1 questions of economic interest of the colonies Belgian Congo and Agreement or other r Available/Not Angola specified Coded area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-24 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 86 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Douro/Duero Spain Convention between Spain and Portugal to regulate the hydro- 8/11/1927 Primary Not 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Commission 1 electric development of the international section of the River Agreement Available/Not Quantity present but Available/Not Douro Coded type not Coded determined by previous analyses 88 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Germany Lielupe Lithuania Convention between the German Reich and the Lithuanian 1/29/1928 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 Republic regarding the maintenance and administration of the Agreement or other frontier waterways specified area(s) 89 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Oder/Odra Poland Slovakia Convention between the Czechoslovak Republic and the Polish 2/18/1928 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Republic concerning the improvement of the rivers Olsa and Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Petruvka signed at Katowice Coded coded Coded ot Coded 90 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Germany Rhine Switzerland Convention between Germany and Switzerland regarding 4/12/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 regulation of the Rhine between Strasbourg-Kehl and Istein Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-25 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 91 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Dominican Republic Artibonite Haiti Massacre Pedernales Treaty of peace, of friendship and of arbitration between the 2/20/1929 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Dominican Republic and the Republic of Haiti, signed at Saint- Agreement two or more Available/Not Domingue countries Coded 92 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile United Kingdom Exchange of notes between His Majesty's government in the 5/7/1929 Primary Entire named 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 United Kingdom and the Egyptian Government in regard to the Agreement basin(s) Quantity quantities use of the waters of the River Nile for irrigation purposes vary according to time of the year Diplomatic Channels 94 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Chile Lake Titicaca-Poopo System Peru Treaty between Chile and Peru for the settlement of the dispute 6/3/1929 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation of 1 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 regarding Tacna and Arica Agreement or other Quantity entire rivers Available/Not Channels specified Coded area(s) Third Party Involvemen t 95 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Switzerland Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-26 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Protocol determining the methods of Technical and Administrative 12/18/1929 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Co-operation between Germany, France and Switzerland in the Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N work for the regulation of the Rhine between Strasbourg-Kehl and Coded coded Coded ot Coded Istein 96 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Switzerland Protocol to the Protocol determining the methods of Technical 1/3/1930 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and Administrative Co-operation between Germany, France and Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Switzerland in the work for the regulation of the Rhine between Coded coded Coded ot Coded Strasbourg-Kehl and Istein 97 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Minute 129 of International Boundary Commission between USA 7/31/1930 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 and Mexico primary or other Quantity quantities, agreement specified variable ( by area(s) water availability) 98 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Unknown United Kingdom Exchange of Notes Constituting an Agreement between France 8/19/1930 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the United Kingdom regarding the protocol and final report of Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N the Commissioners appointed to define the frontier between the specified coded Coded ot Coded British and French Mandated Territories in Togoland. London, 30 area(s) Jan 99 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Switzerland Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-27 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention for the settlement of relations between Switzerland 8/27/1926 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 and France on the subject of certain clauses of the legal regime of primary or other r the future derivation of Kembs agreement specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 100 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention between Switzerland and France on the subject of the 11/19/1930 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 concession of the Chatelot waterfall Agreement or other r specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 101 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Kunene South Africa Exchange of notes... respecting the boundary between the 4/29/1931 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 mandated territory of South Africa and Angola Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N specified coded Coded ot Coded area(s) 102 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Austria Rhine Liechtenstein Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-28 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between Austria and Liechtenstein regarding the regulation 6/23/1931 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of the Rhine and tributary waters Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 103 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Unknown United Kingdom The Protocol between France and the United Kingdom, relative to 10/21/1931 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 the settlement of the frontier between Syria and Jebel Druze on Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N the one side and Trans-Jordan on the other side Coded coded Coded ot Coded 104 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile Sudan Jebel Awilya Compensation Agreement. 1932 1/1/1932 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 105 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown London Convention 4/16/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 106 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Rio Grande (North America) United States of America Convention between the United States of America and the United 2/1/1933 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Mexican States for the rectification of the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo Agreement or other del Norte) in the El Paso-Juarez Valley specified area(s) 107 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) South Africa Zambezi Zambia Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-29 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange of notes between the Union of South Africa and 7/25/1933 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Northern Rhodesia regarding the Eastern Boundary between the TFDD Available/Not Available/Not Caprivi Strip and Northern Rhodesia and the grant of privileges to inclusion Coded Coded Northern Rhodesia natives on the Caprivi Islands. Pretoria and criteria Cape Tow 108 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Juba-Shibeli United Kingdom Exchange of notes setting out an agreement between His 11/22/1933 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Prioritization 1 None 0 None 0 Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom and the Italian Agreement or other Quantity of uses government regarding the boundary between Kenya and Italian specified Somaliland, together with the agreement adopted by the area(s) boundary commission and ap 109 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil Chuy Uruguay La Plata Lagoon Mirim Convention regarding the determination of the legal status of the 12/20/1933 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 frontier between Brazil and Uruguay Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) 110 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Congo/Zaire United Kingdom Nile Agreement between the United Kingdom and Belgium regarding 11/22/1934 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 water rights on the boundary between Tanganyika and Ruanda- Agreement or other Quantity of flow Urundi specified area(s) 111 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Dominican Republic Artibonite Haiti Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-30 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Boundary Agreement between the Dominican Republic and the 4/18/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Republic of Haiti. Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 112 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bolivia Lake Titicaca-Poopo System Peru Preliminary convention between Bolivia and Peru for the 7/17/1935 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 exploitation of fisheries in Lake Titicaca TFDD Available/Not Available/Not inclusion Coded Coded criteria 113 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of Notes constituting an Agreement between the United 11/6/1935 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 States of America and Canada regarding the level of Lake Agreement or other Memphremagog specified area(s) 114 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Dominican Republic Artibonite Haiti Massacre Pedernales Additional protocol to the Treaty of 1/21/1929 regarding the 4/19/1905 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 delimitation of the frontier between the two countries. (Boundary primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Agreement between the Dominican Republic and the Republic of agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded Haiti) 115 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Ruvuma United Kingdom Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 5/11/1936 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Permanent 1 Kingdom and Portugal regarding the boundary between Agreement basin(s) Judicial Tanganyika Territory and Mozambique. Lisbon, May 11, 1936- Organ December 28, 1937 Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-31 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 116 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) El Salvador Lempa Guatemala Paz Treaty for the delimitation of the boundary between Guatemala 4/9/1938 Primary All waters of 1 Water Percentage 1 Not 0 Not 0 and El Salvador Agreement two or more Quantity of flow Available/Not Available/N countries Coded ot Coded Prioritization of uses 117 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) United Kingdom Nelson-Saskatchewan United States of America Convention between Canada and the United States of America 9/15/1938 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 None 0 providing for emergency regulation of the level of Rainy Lake and Agreement basin(s) and dry of the level of other boundary waters in the Rainy Lake Watershed season control 118 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Paraguay Supplementary boundary treaty between Argentina and Paraguay, 7/5/1939 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Unclear 1 Not 0 Not 0 signed at Buenos Aires Agreement or other Quantity Available/Not Available/N specified Coded ot Coded area(s) 119 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes between the government of the United States 11/7/1940 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 of America and the government of Canada constituting an Agreement or other Quantity quantities agreement regarding the development of certain portions of the specified Great Lakes- St. Lawrence Basin project area(s) 120 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-32 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement for the utilization of water in the Great Lakes-St. 3/19/1941 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Lawrence Basin Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 121 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes between the government of the United States 5/20/1941 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 and the government of Canada constituting an arrangement primary or other Quantity quantities concerning temporary diversion for power purposes of additional agreement specified waters of the Niagara River above the falls area(s) Prioritization of uses 122 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes between the governments of the United States 11/10/1941 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Dry Season 1 None 0 of America and of Canada constituting an agreement relating to primary or other Control the temporary raising of the level of Lake St.Francis during lower agreement specified water periods, Washington area(s) 123 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the 11/27/1941 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 government of the United States and the government of Canada primary or other Quantity quantities relating to additional temporary diversion for power purposes of agreement specified waters of the Niagara River above Niagara Falls area(s) 124 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-33 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange of notes constituting an agreement 10/9/1942 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 extending...agreement [re. raising level of Lake St. Francis, Nov. to a Primary or other 11, 1941], Washington 5 and 9 October 1942 Agreement specified area(s) 125 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of Notes constituting an Agreement between Canada 10/9/1943 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the United States extending the agreement for the temporary primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N raising of the level of Lake St. Francis of November 10, 1941 agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 126 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 3/3/1944 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 States of America and Canada relating to a study to be made by primary basin(s) the International Joint Commission with respect to the Upper agreement Columbia River Basin. 127 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ecuador Amazon Peru Declaration and exchange of Notes concerning the termination of 5/22/1944 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the process of demarcation of the Peruvian-Ecuadorean frontier primary or other agreement specified area(s) 128 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes (August 31 and September 7, 1944) between 9/7/1944 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 None 0 Canada and the United States extending the agreement for the primary or other Quantity quantities, and dry temporary raising of the level of Lake St. Francis of November 10, agreement specified variable ( by season control 1941 area(s) water availability) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-34 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 129 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Tijuana Treaty between the United States of America and Mexico relating 11/14/1944 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation of 1 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 to the waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers, and of the Rio Agreement or other Quantity entire rivers Grande (Rio Bravo) from Fort Quitman, Texas, to the Gulf of specified Mexico, signed at Washington on 3 February 1944, and area(s) suplementary Diplomatic Channels Fixed Commission quantities Diplomatic Channels Fixed Commission quantities, recoupable (in later periods if not met) Diplomatic Channels Percentage Commission of flow Diplomatic Channels Prioritization Commission of uses Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-35 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 130 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Paraguay Supplementary boundary treaty between the Argentine Republic 6/1/1945 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the Republic of Paraguay on the river Pilcomayo and protocol primary or other Available/Not Available/N annexed to the treaty agreement specified Coded ot Coded area(s) 131 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iraq Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Turkey Treaty of friendship and neighbourly relations, and six annexed 3/29/1946 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 protocols, signed at Ankara Agreement basin(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 132 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Egypt Nile United Kingdom Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 12/10/1946 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Egypt TFDD Available/Not Available/Not regarding the utilisation of profits from the 1940 British inclusion Coded Coded government cotton buying commission and the 1941 joint Anglo- criteria Egyptian cotton Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-36 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 133 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Uruguay Agreement concerning the utilization of the rapids of the Uruguay 12/30/1946 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 River in the Salto Grande area Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels Prioritization Arbitration of uses Commission Diplomatic Channels 134 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Finland Pasvik Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Treaty between the USSR and Finland on the transfer to the 2/3/1947 Does not fit Sub-basin(s) 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 territory of the Soviet Union of part of the state territory of TFDD or other Available/Not Available/N Finland in the region of the Janiskoski Hydroelectric Power Station inclusion specified Coded ot Coded and the Niskakoski Control Dam criteria area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-37 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 135 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Australia Rhone Belgium Brazil Byelarus Canada China Czech Republic Ethiopia France Greece India Italy Netherlands New Zealand Poland Slovakia South Africa Ukraine Union of Soviet Socialist Republi United Kingdom United States of America Yugoslavia (Former) Treaty of peace with Italy, signed at Paris 2/10/1947 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement or other specified area(s) 136 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Pasvik Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-38 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Regulations for the regulation of Lake Inari in connexion with the 4/24/1947 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 use of the Niskakoski Dam signed at Moscow Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 137 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ethiopia Juba-Shibeli United Kingdom Lake Turkana Exchange of Notes Constituting an Agreement between the 9/29/1947 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern of a Primary or other available/not Available/Not Available/N Ireland and the Government of Ethiopia Amending the Description Agreement specified coded Coded ot Coded of the Kenya-Ethiopia Boundary. Addis Ababa, 29 September, 1947 area(s) 138 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) India Indus Pakistan Inter-dominion agreement between the government of India and 5/4/1948 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the government of Pakistan on the canal water dispute between Agreement or other East and West Punjab specified area(s) 139 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Poland Lava/Pregel Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Neman Vistula/Wista Agreement between Poland and the USSR concerning the regime 7/8/1948 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 on the Soviet-Polish state frontier Agreement or other specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-39 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 140 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Bulgaria Danube Czech Republic Hungary Romania Slovakia Ukraine Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Yugoslavia (Former) Convention regarding the regime of navigation on the Danube 8/18/1948 Does not fit Entire named 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 TFDD basin(s) Available/Not inclusion Coded criteria 141 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Protocol between the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia and 12/31/1948 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the People's Republic of Romania governing crossing of the Agreement two or more frontier by officials of the water control services countries 142 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Egypt Nile United Kingdom Exchanges of notes constituting an agreement between the 5/31/1949 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Agreement or other and dry Ireland and the government of Egypt regarding the construction of specified season control the Owen Falls Dam, Uganda area(s) Diplomatic Channels 143 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Rhine Switzerland Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-40 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between Switzerland and Italy on the subject of the 6/18/1949 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 concession of hydraulic forces of the Reno Di Lei, with additional Agreement or other r protocol specified area(s) Commission 144 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Treaty between the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist 11/25/1949 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Republics and the government of the Romanian People's Republic Agreement or other concerning the regime of the Soviet-Romanian state frontier and specified final protocol area(s) 145 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Egypt Nile United Kingdom Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the 12/5/1949 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern primary or other Ireland and the government of Egypt regarding the construction of agreement specified the Owen Falls Dam, Uganda area(s) 146 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Hungary Danube Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Treaty between the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist 2/24/1950 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Republics and the government of the Hungarian People's Republic Agreement or other Available/Not concerning the regime of the Soviet-Hungarian state frontier and specified Coded final protocol area(s) 147 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-41 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between the United States of America and Canada relating 2/27/1950 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 to the uses of the waters of the Niagara River to a Primary or other Quantity quantities, Agreement specified variable ( by area(s) water availability) Hydropowe Percentage r Water Percentage Quantity of flow 148 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile United Kingdom Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the 3/20/1950 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Agreement or other Ireland on behalf of the government of Uganda and the specified government of Egypt regarding cooperation in meteorological and area(s) hydrological surve 149 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Rhine France Schelde Luxembourg Seine Protocol to establish a tripartite standing committee on polluted 4/8/1950 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 waters, signed at Brussels Agreement or other specified area(s) 150 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Treaty between Canada and the United States of America 2/27/1950 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 Not 0 None 0 concerning the diversion of the Niagara River, with agreement to a Primary or other Quantity of flow Available/Not between Canada and Ontario and protocol of exchange Agreement specified Coded area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-42 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 151 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Zambezi Zambia Zimbabwe Convention with agreements regarding use of Zambezi waters and 5/31/1950 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 effects of the proposed Kariba Dam. Salisbury, 30 and 31 May, Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N 1950 Coded coded Coded ot Coded 153 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Afghanistan Helmand Iran Terms of reference of the Helmand River Delta Commission and an 9/7/1950 Not a treaty Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Consultation 1 Not 0 None 0 interpretive statement relative thereto, agreed by conferees of or other Quantity Available/Not Afghanistan and Iran specified Coded area(s) 154 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Germany Agreement between the Austrian Federal government and the 10/16/1950 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 Bavarian State government concerning the diversion of water in international or other Quantity present but Available/Not the Rissbach, Durrach and Walchen districts treaty specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 156 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Amur Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Navigation procedures and construction on border rivers 5/4/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 (including Amur, Ussuri, Argun). (Agreement text is not available. Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Title retrieved from Johnston and Chiu (1968).) Coded coded Coded ot Coded 157 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) El Salvador Unknown Guatemala Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-43 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty of free trade and economic integration (with annexes and 5/4/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 exchange of letters). Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 158 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Po Switzerland Convention between the Swiss Confederation and the Italian 4/5/1951 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Republic concerning the correction of the Roggia Molinara (towns Agreement or other of Chiasso and of Come), concluded at Chiasso specified area(s) 159 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Eritrea Gash Sudan Letters between the irrigation adviser and director of irrigation, 4/18/1951 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Not 0 None 0 Sudan government, and the controller of agriculture, Eritrea Agreement or other Quantity quantities, Available/Not specified variable ( by Coded area(s) water availability) 160 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Naatamo Norway Agreement between Finland and Norway on the transfer from the 4/25/1951 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation of 1 None 0 None 0 course of the Näätämo (Neiden) River to the course of the Gandvik Agreement or other Quantity entire rivers River of water from the Garsjoen, Kjerringvatn and Forstevannene specified Lakes area(s) 161 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Douro/Duero Spain Exchange of notes amending article 14, paragraph 2, of the 9/27/1951 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 convention of 11 August 1927 to a Primary or other Available/Not Agreement specified Coded area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-44 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 162 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Czech Republic Vistula/Wista Poland Slovakia Agreement between the Government of the Peoples’ Republic of 5/5/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Poland and the Government of the Czechoslovakian Republic on Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N regulation of certain problems related to the construction of a Coded coded Coded ot Coded dam on the Orawa River near Ujście on the banks of the Orawa. 163 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Poland Danube Elbe Oder/Odra Agreement between the government of the Polish Republic and 2/6/1952 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Consultation 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 the government of the German Democratic Republic concerning Agreement or other Quantity navigation in frontier waters and the use and maintenance of specified frontier waters, signed at Berlin area(s) 164 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Germany Agreement between the government of the Republic of Austria 2/13/1952 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 and the government of the Federal Republic of Germany and of Agreement or other r the free state of Bavaria concerning the Donaukraftwerk- specified Jochenstein-Aktiengesellschaft (Danube Power-Plant and area(s) Jochenstein Joint-Stoch 165 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Unknown Yugoslavia (Former) Summary protocol of the meeting at Bled between Governments 2/29/1952 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of Austrian Republic and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-45 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 166 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Austria Unknown Yugoslavia (Former) Summary protocol of the meeting at Velden between 5/10/1952 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Governments of Austrian Republic and the Federal Republic of Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Yugoslavia Coded coded Coded ot Coded 167 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 6/30/1952 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 States of America and Canada relating to the St. Lawrence Seaway primary or other Project, Washington agreement specified area(s) 168 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Convention between the government of the Union of Soviet 12/25/1952 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Dry Season 1 None 0 Socialist Republics and the government of the Romanian People's Agreement or other Control Republics concerning measures to prevent floods and to regulate specified the water regime of the River Prut area(s) 169 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile United Kingdom Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the 1/5/1953 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 0 None 0 None 0 government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern primary or other Ireland and the government of Egypt regarding the construction of agreement specified the Owen Falls Dam in Uganda area(s) 170 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Zambezi United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-46 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between Her 1/21/1953 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Majesty's government in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Agreement or other Northern Ireland and the Portuguese government providing for specified the Portuguese participation in the Shiré Valley Project area(s) 171 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Jordan Jordan Syria Agreement between the Republic of Syria and the Hashemite 6/4/1953 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation of 1 Dry Season 1 Arbitration 1 Kingdom of Jordan concerning the utilization of the Yarmuk waters. Agreement or other Quantity entire rivers Control specified area(s) Hydropowe Fixed r quantities and percentage 172 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Unknown Yugoslavia (Former) Summary protocol of the meeting at Opatija between 7/10/1953 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Governments of Austrian Republic and the Federal Republic of Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Yugoslavia Coded coded Coded ot Coded 173 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 11/12/1953 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 States and Canada relating to the establishment of the St. primary or other Lawrence River joint board of engineers agreement specified area(s) 175 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Austria Rhine Switzerland Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-47 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of 4/10/1954 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Dry Season 1 Arbitration 1 Austria for the regulation of the Rhine from the mouth of the Ill to primary or other Control Lake Constance agreement specified area(s) 176 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Danube Hungary Slovakia Agreement between Czechoslovakia and Hungary concerning the 4/16/1954 Missing Not 0 Water Percentage 1 Not 0 None 0 settlement of technical and economic questions relating to Available/Not Quantity of flow Available/Not frontier water… Coded Coded 177 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Nepal Agreement between the government of India and the government 4/25/1954 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Consultation 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 of Nepal on the Kosi project Agreement or other Quantity specified area(s) Hydropowe Percentage r 178 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Protocol of 26 April 1954 concerning amendments to paragragh 2 4/29/1954 Amendment Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of the "Regulations for the regulation of Lake Inari in connexion to a Primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N with the use of the Niskakoski Dam" Agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 179 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Convention between the government of the Federal People's 5/25/1954 Primary Entire named 1 Hydropowe Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 Republic of Yugoslavia and the Federal Government of the Agreement basin(s) r quantities Austrian Republic concerning water economy questions relating to the Drava, signed at Geneva Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-48 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention between the government of the Federal People's 5/25/1954 Primary Entire named 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 Republic of Yugoslavia and the Federal Government of the Agreement basin(s) Quantity quantities, Austrian Republic concerning water economy questions relating to variable ( by the Drava, signed at Geneva water availability) 180 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Greece Lake Prespa Yugoslavia (Former) Struma Vardar Exchange of notes between Greece and Yugoslavia concerning 5/25/1954 Semi- Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 hydro-economic quesitons international Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N treaty Coded coded Coded ot Coded 181 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 8/17/1954 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 States of America and Canada modifying and supplementing the of a Primary or other agreement of 30 June 1952 relating to the St. Lawrence Seaway Agreement specified Project area(s) 182 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of Notes Constituting an Agreement Relating to the 9/13/1954 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Construction of Remedial Works at Niagara Falls primary or other agreement specified area(s) 183 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Zambezi United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-49 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the government of the United Kingdom of 11/18/1954 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Dry Season 1 Arbitration 1 Great Britain and Northern Ireland on their own behalf and on Agreement or other Control behalf of the government of the Federation of Rhodesia and specified Nyasaland and the government of Portugal with regard to certain area(s) Angolan and 184 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Zambezi United Kingdom Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom and 11/18/1954 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Northern Ireland (acting on their behalf and on behalf of the Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Government of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland) and Coded coded Coded ot Coded the Government of Portugal regarding the Nyasaland- Mozambique Frontier. Li 185 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Kura-Araks Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement Between Iran and the Union of Soviet Socialist 12/2/1954 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Republics Concerning the Line to be Taken by the New Frontier Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Between Iran and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics through Coded coded Coded ot Coded the Reservoirs of the Ararex Hyro-Engineering Complex and the Milmugan 186 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement between the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia 12/16/1954 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 and the Republic of Austria concerning water economy questions Agreement or other in respect of the frontier sector of the Mura and the frontier specified waters of the Mura (the Mura Agreement); and, Protocol to the area(s) Mura Commission Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-50 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 187 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Czech Republic Unknown Slovakia Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Convention on the management of the water regime of the 5/8/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Latorica and Uzh Rivers signed between the Government of the Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Government of the Coded coded Coded ot Coded Republic of Czechoslovakia. 188 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Unknown Turkey Treaty between Turkey and Iran on the Sarisu and Karasu Rivers. 11/18/1955 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 189 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Po Italy Provisional agreement and exchange of notes between France and 1/12/1955 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Italy relative to the running of the factory of Gran Scala primary or other Available/Not agreement specified Coded area(s) 190 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement between Yugoslavia and Romania concerning 4/7/1955 Missing Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 questions of water control on water control systems and Available/Not Available/Not watercourses on or intersected Coded Coded 191 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bolivia Lake Titicaca-Poopo System Peru Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-51 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange of notes between Peru and Bolivia establishing a joint 4/20/1955 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 commission for study of the Puno-Guaqui railway line and joint Agreement basin(s) use of the waters of Lake Titicaca 192 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bolivia Lake Titicaca-Poopo System Peru Preliminary convention between Peru and Bolivia concerning a 7/30/1955 Primary Entire named 1 Water Prior 1 None 0 None 0 study of the joint utilization of the waters of Lake Titicaca Agreement basin(s) Quantity Approval 193 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Hungary Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement between Yugoslavia and Hungary together with the 8/8/1955 Missing Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 statute of the Yugoslav-Hungarian water economy commission. Available/Not Available/Not Coded Coded 194 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Italy Po Switzerland Convention between Italy and Switzerland on the subject of 9/17/1955 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 regulation of Lake Lugano and additional protocol Agreement or other specified area(s) Commission Permanent Judicial Organ 196 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil La Plata Paraguay Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-52 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement concerning cooperation between Brazil and Paraguay 1/20/1956 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 in a study on the utilization of the water power of the Acaray and Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Monday Rivers Coded coded Coded ot Coded 197 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Pasvik Norway Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Protocol concerning amendments to the Regulations of 24 April 2/24/1956 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 None 0 1947 for the regulation of Lake Inari in connexion with the use of to a Primary or other Quantity quantities, and dry the Niskakoski Dam and the Protocol of 29 April 1954 concerning Agreement specified variable ( by season control amendments to paragraph 2 of the said Regulations, signed at O area(s) water availability) 198 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Greece Struma Yugoslavia (Former) Proces-verbal of the delegations of the Federal People's Republic 3/31/1956 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 of Yugoslavia and of the Kingdom of Greece, meeting of 23 to 30 Agreement or other Quantity quantities March 1956 for the question of Lake Doiran's water level specified area(s) 199 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Hungary Treaty between the Hungarian People’s Republic and the Republic 4/9/1956 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 of Austria concerning the regulation of water economy questions Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) Prioritization of uses 200 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Amur Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-53 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and 8/18/1956 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the People's Republic of China on joint research operations to Agreement or other determine the natural resources of the Amur River Basin and the specified prospects for development of its productive potentialities and on area(s) 201 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Danube Hungary Slovakia Treaty between Czechoslovakia and Hungary concerning the 10/13/1956 Missing Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 regime of state frontiers. Available/Not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded ot Coded 202 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany and the 10/27/1956 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Allocation of 1 Not 0 Arbitration 1 French Republic on the management of the upper course of the Agreement or other r entire rivers Available/Not Rhine between Basel and Strasbourg and protocol annexed to the specified Coded convention, signed at Luxembourg area(s) Diplomatic Channels Water Fixed Arbitration Quantity quantities vary according to time of the year Diplomatic Channels 203 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Luxembourg Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-54 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany, the French 10/27/1956 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Republic, and the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg on the subject of Agreement or other Available/Not Moselle canalization specified Coded area(s) Diplomatic Channels 204 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Treaty between the French Republic and the Federal Republic of 10/27/1956 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Germany for the settlement of the question of the Sarre Agreement or other specified area(s) 205 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Albania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement between the government of the Federal People's 12/5/1956 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 Republic of Yugoslavia and the government of the People's Agreement two or more Republic of Albania concerning water economy questions, countries together with the statue of the Yugoslav-Albanian Water economic commission and with Diplomatic Channels 206 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Bolivia Lake Titicaca-Poopo System Peru Agreement between Bolivia and Peru concerning a preliminary 2/19/1957 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 economic study of the joint utilization of the waters of Lake primary basin(s) Quantity of flow Titicaca. agreement Prioritization of uses Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-55 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 207 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium General France Italy Luxembourg Treaty between Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, 3/25/1957 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands instituting the Agreement two or more Available/Not European Community of the Atomic Energy (EURATOM) countries Coded 208 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement relating to 4/9/1957 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 navigation improvements of the Great Lakes connecting channels TFDD Available/Not Available/Not of the Saint Lawrence Seaway inclusion Coded Coded criteria 209 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Atrak Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Kura-Araks Treaty between the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist 5/14/1957 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Republics and the Imperial Government of Iran concerning the Agreement or other regime of the Soviet-Iranian frontier and the procedure for the specified settlement of frontier disputes and incidents area(s) Diplomatic Channels 210 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Hungary Unknown Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement between the Government of the Federal People's 5/25/1957 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Republic of Yugoslavia and the Government of the Hungarian Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N People's Republic concerning fishing in frontier waters Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-56 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 211 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Italy Po Switzerland Convention between the Swiss Confederation and the Italian 5/27/1957 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 Republic on the subject of utilization of the hydraulic force of the Agreement or other r quantities Spol and additional protocol specified area(s) Water Quantity Hydropowe Commission r Water Quantity 212 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Pasvik Norway Tana Agreement between Norway and Finland concerning the 6/28/1957 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 construction and maintenance of a bridge across the Anarjokka TFDD Available/Not Available/Not (Inarijoki) River. Signed at Helsinki, on June 28, 1957 inclusion Coded Coded criteria 213 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Isonzo Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement between the government of the Italian Republic and 7/18/1957 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 the government of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia Agreement or other Quantity quantities concerning the water supply of the town of Gorizia in accordance specified and with paragraph 5 of Annex 5 of the treaty of peace with Italy and e area(s) percentage 214 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Iran Atrak Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Kura-Araks Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-57 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between Iran and the Soviet Union for the joint 8/11/1957 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 utilisation of the frontier parts of the rivers Aras and Atrak for Agreement or other r irrigation and power generation specified area(s) Water Percentage Quantity of flow 215 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Greece Struma Yugoslavia (Former) Proces-verbal of the meeting of delegations of the Federal 9/1/1957 Semi- Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 People's Republic of Yugoslavia and of the Kingdom of Greece international Available/Not Available/Not which took place on 26 August to 1 September 1957 at Stari treaty Coded Coded Dojran to draw up the mode and the level of collaboration with regard to hyd 216 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cambodia (Kampuchea) Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Thailand Vietnam Statute of the Committee for Co-ordination of Investigations of 10/31/1957 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the Lower Mekong Basin established by the governments of Agreement or other Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and the Republic of Viet-Nam in specified response to the decisions taken by the United Nations Economic area(s) Commission for 217 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Norway Pasvik Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between Norway and the Union of Soviet Socialist 12/18/1957 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 Republics on the utilization of water power on the Pasvik (Paatso) Agreement or other r quantities River specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-58 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 218 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) China Yalu Korea, Democratic People's Rep Protocol on China’s supply of whole sets of equipment and 5/11/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 machinery for the joint construction of a power station on the Yalu Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N River. Coded coded Coded ot Coded 219 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Paraguay Agreement between the Argentine Republic and the Republic of 1/23/1958 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Paraguay concerning a study of the utilization of the water power Agreement or other of the Apipe Falls specified area(s) 220 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Danube Romania Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Yugoslavia (Former) Convention Between the Governments of the Romanian People's 1/29/1958 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Republic, the People's Republic of Bulgaria, the Federal People's Agreement basin(s) Republic of Yugoslavia and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics concerning fishing in the waters of the Danube 221 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Iran Unknown Pakistan Boundary Agreement Between Iran and Pakistan, with Exchange of 2/6/1958 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Notes Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-59 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 222 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Czech Republic Oder/Odra Poland Slovakia Agreement between the government of the Czechoslovak Republic 3/21/1958 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Consultation 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 and the government of the Polish People's Republic concerning of a Primary or other Quantity the use of water resources in frontier waters Agreement specified area(s) 223 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement concerning water-economy questions between the 4/4/1958 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 government of the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia and the Agreement two or more government of the People's Republic of Bulgaria countries Diplomatic Channels 224 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Luxembourg Rhine State treaty between Luxembourg and West Germany concerning 7/10/1958 Semi- Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 the construction of hydroelectric power-installations on the Our international Available/Not Available/Not (with annexes) treaty Coded Coded 225 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Garonne Spain Agreement between the government of the French Republic and 7/12/1958 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 the Spanish government relating to Lake Lanoux Agreement or other Quantity quantities specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-60 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 226 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Finland Pasvik Norway Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between the government of the Union of Soviet 4/29/1959 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Commission 1 Socialist Republics, the government of Norway and the of a Primary or other Quantity quantities, government of Finland concerning the regulation of Lake Inari by Agreement specified variable ( by means of the Kaitakoski hydro-electric power station and dam and area(s) water additional prot availability) Diplomatic Channels 227 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Greece Lake Prespa Yugoslavia (Former) Struma Vardar Agreement between the Federal People's Republic of Yugoslavia 6/18/1959 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 and the Kingdom of Greece concerning hydro-economic questions, Agreement or other signed at Athens specified area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels 228 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Unknown Spain Convention between France and Spain concerning fishing in the 7/14/1959 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Bidasoa River and the Bay of Figuier Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-61 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 229 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) India Indus Pakistan Indo-Pakistan agreement (with appendices) on East Pakistan 10/23/1959 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 border disputes Agreement two or more countries 230 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile Sudan Agreement between the government of the United Arab Republic 11/8/1959 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Commission 1 and the government of Sudan for full utilization of the Nile waters Agreement or other Quantity quantities specified area(s) 231 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention between Switzerland and France concerning the 12/3/1959 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 correction of Ruisseau (Le Boiron) Agreement or other specified area(s) 232 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention between Switzerland and France concerning the 12/3/1959 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 correction of the Hermance Agreement or other specified area(s) 233 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Nepal Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-62 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between His Majesty's government of Nepal and the 12/4/1959 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 government of India on the Gandak Irrigation and Power Project Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels 234 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Unknown Poland Slovakia Treaty between the Government of the People’s Republic of 5/13/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Poland and the Government of the Czechoslovakian Republic on Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N regulating certain issues related to the construction of the dam on Coded coded Coded ot Coded the River Witka (Smeda). 235 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Unknown Italy Convention between France and Italy regarding the hydroelectric 5/13/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 management of the Mont Cenis. Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 236 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) China Yalu Korea, Democratic People's Rep Agreement on strengthening cooperation in border zones along 5/13/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 the Yalu River. Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 237 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Convention on the Ghent-Terneuzen Canal 5/13/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-63 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 238 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Germany Unknown Netherlands Treaty between Germany and the Netherlands on arrangements 5/13/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 for co-operation in the Ems estuary (Ems-Dollard Treaty) Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 239 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Indus Pakistan Agreement between Pakistan and India on West Pakistan-India 1/11/1960 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 border disputes TFDD Available/Not Available/Not inclusion Coded Coded criteria 240 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile Sudan Protocol (to the November 8, 1959 agreement) Concerning the 1/17/1960 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Establishment of the Permanent Joint Technical Committee. Cairo, primary or other 17 January, 1960 agreement specified area(s) 241 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Germany Rhine Netherlands Treaty between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Federal 4/8/1960 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Republic of Germany concerning the course of the common Agreement or other available/not Available/Not frontier, the boundary waters, real property situated near the specified coded Coded frontier, traffic crossing the frontier on land and via inland waters, area(s) and Commission Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-64 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Federal 4/8/1960 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Permanent 1 Republic of Germany concerning the course of the common Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Judicial frontier, the boundary waters, real property situated near the specified coded Coded Organ frontier, traffic crossing the frontier on land and via inland waters, area(s) and 242 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Indus Pakistan Indus waters treaty 1960 between the government of India, the 9/19/1960 Primary Entire named 1 Water Allocation of 1 Flood Control 1 Not 0 government of Pakistan and the International Bank for Agreement basin(s) Quantity entire rivers Available/N Reconstruction and Development ot Coded Fixed quantities vary according to time of the year Prioritization of uses 243 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Rio Grande (North America) United States of America Agreement to proceed with the construction of Amistad Dam on 10/24/1960 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 the Rio Grande to from part of the system of international storage primary or other dams provided for by the water treaty of February 3, 1944 agreement specified area(s) 244 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Agreement concerning the protection of Lake Constance against 10/27/1960 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 pollution Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-65 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 245 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Guatemala Unknown Mexico Exchange of notes between Mexico and Guatemala constituting an 5/14/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 agreement on the establishment of an International Boundary and Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Water Commission. Coded coded Coded ot Coded 246 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Treaty relating to cooperative development of the water resources 1/17/1961 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 of the Columbia River Basin (with annexes) Agreement or other Quantity quantities specified area(s) Commission Hydropowe Percentage Arbitration r Commission Water Prioritization Arbitration Quantity of uses Commission 247 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Poland Unknown Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Treaty of 15 February 1961 signed in Moscow(between Poland and 2/15/1961 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 USSR) Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-66 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 248 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Rhine Netherlands Exchange of notes constituting an agreement concerning the 2/24/1961 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 treaty of 12 May 1863 to regulate the diversion of water from the to a Primary or other River Meuse and the convention of 11 January 1873 amending Agreement specified that treaty area(s) 249 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Uruguay Treaty between the Argentine Republic and the Eastern Republic 4/7/1961 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 of Uruguay on the boundary constituted by the Uruguay River Agreement or other Available/Not Available/N specified Coded ot Coded area(s) 251 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Protocol concerning the establishment of an international 12/20/1961 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 commission to protect the Saar against pollution, signed at Paris primary basin(s) Channels agreement 252 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Luxembourg Protocol between the government of the Federal Republic of 12/20/1961 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Germany, the French Republic and the Grand Duchy of primary basin(s) Luxembourg concerning the establishment of an international agreement commission to protect the Moselle against pollution Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-67 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 254 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention concerning protection of the waters of Lake Geneva 11/16/1962 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 against pollution Agreement or other specified area(s) 255 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Unknown Swaziland Decree concerning the publication of the exchange of letters 5/16/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 between France and Switzerland, regarding the compensation of Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N the French authorities by Switzerland for the water rights due to Coded coded Coded ot Coded the diversion of the Allaine River. 256 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil Lagoon Mirim Uruguay Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between Brazil and 4/26/1963 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 Uruguay establishing a joint commission for the development of Agreement basin(s) Channels the Mirim Lagoon 257 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland Agreement on the International Commision for the protection of 4/29/1963 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the Rhine against pollution Agreement or other specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-68 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 258 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Unknown Netherlands Treaty between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Kingdom 5/13/1963 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of Belgium concerning the connexion between the Scheldt and the Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Rhine Coded coded Coded ot Coded 259 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Guinea Senegal Mali Mauritania Senegal Convention of Bamako 7/26/1963 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 Agreement basin(s) Available/Not Coded 260 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Garonne Spain Convention between the government of the French Republic and 7/29/1963 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 Spanish government relative to the management of the upper Agreement or other Quantity quantities course of the Garonne specified area(s) Hydropowe Percentage r 261 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil Unknown Uruguay Notes between Brazil and Uruguay 8/5/1963 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-69 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 263 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Rio Grande (North America) United States of America Boundary solution of the problem of the Chamizal 8/29/1963 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 primary or other agreement specified area(s) 264 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Niger Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Act regarding navigation and economic co-operation between the 10/26/1963 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 states of the Niger Basin Agreement basin(s) Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 265 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Zambia Zambezi Zimbabwe Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-70 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement relating to the Central African Power Corporation 11/25/1963 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Commission 1 international or other Quantity present but Available/Not treaty specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 266 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Convention between the government of the Socialist Federal 11/30/1963 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Fixed 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 Republic of Yugoslavia and the government of the Romanian primary or other r quantities People's Republic concerning the operation of the Iron Gates agreement specified recouped in water power and navigation system on the River Danube area(s) the following period Percentage 267 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement between the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 11/30/1963 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 and the Romanian People’s Republic concerning the construction Agreement or other r and operation of the Iron Gates water power and navigation specified system on the River Danube area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels 268 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-71 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention between the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia 11/30/1963 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 and the Romanian People’s Republic concerning compensation for primary or other damage caused by the construction of the Iron Gates water power agreement specified and navigation system on the River Danube area(s) 269 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Convention between the government of the Socialist Federal 11/30/1963 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Republic of Yugoslavia and the government of the Romanian primary or other People's Republic concerning the preparation of designs for the agreement specified construction of the Iron Gates Water power and navigation system area(s) on the Ri 270 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Convention between the government of the Socialist Federal 11/30/1963 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Republic of Yugoslavia and the government of the Romanian primary or other People's Republic concerning the execution of works for the Iron agreement specified Gates Water power and navigation system on the River Danube area(s) 271 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Final act, agreement and other acts relating to the establishment 11/30/1963 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 and operation of the Iron Gates Water power and navigation primary or other system on the River Danube agreement specified area(s) 272 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Romania Danube Yugoslavia (Former) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-72 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention between the government of the Socialist Federal 11/30/1963 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Republic of Yugoslavia and the government of the Romanian primary or other People's Republic concerning the determination of the value of agreement specified investments and mutual accounting in connexion with the area(s) construction of the 273 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between Canada 1/22/1964 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 and the United States of America concerning the treaty relating to primary or other cooperative development of the water resources of the Columbia agreement specified River Basin area(s) 274 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between Canada 1/22/1964 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 and the United States of America regarding sale of Canada’s primary or other entitlement to downstream benefits under the treaty relating to agreement specified co-operative development of the water resources of the Columbia area(s) River Ba 275 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Guinea Senegal Mali Mauritania Senegal Convention Relating to the Statute of the Senegal River. Dakar, 7 2/7/1964 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 February, 1964 Agreement basin(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-73 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention Relating to the Statute of the Senegal River. Dakar, 7 2/7/1964 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Permanent 1 February, 1964 Agreement basin(s) Judicial Organ 276 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iraq Unknown Kuwait Agreement between Iraq and Kuwait concerning the supply of 2/11/1964 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Not 0 Not 0 Kuwait with fresh water Agreement or other Quantity quantities Available/Not Available/N specified Coded ot Coded area(s) 277 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Finland Kemi Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Olanga Oulu Pasvik Tuloma Vuoksa Agreement between Finland and the Union of Soviet Socialist 4/24/1964 Available but Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Republics concerning frontier watercourses (with exchange of not Available/Not Available/Not letters), Helsinki translated to Coded Coded English 278 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cameroon Lake Chad Chad Niger Nigeria Convention and statutes relating to the development of the Chad 5/22/1964 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Basin Agreement basin(s) Commission Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-74 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention and statutes relating to the development of the Chad 5/22/1964 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Permanent 1 Basin Agreement basin(s) Judicial Organ 279 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Bidasoa Spain Exchange of letters between the French Republic and the State of 5/23/1964 Does not fit Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Spain concerning the management of the Bidassoa TFDD Available/Not Available/Not inclusion Coded Coded criteria 280 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Douro/Duero Spain Convention between Spain and Portugal for regulating the 7/16/1964 Primary Entire named 1 Hydropowe Prioritization 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 hydroelectric development of the international reaches of the Agreement basin(s) r of uses Duero river and of its tributaries Diplomatic Channels 281 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Poland Vistula/Wista Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between the government of the Polish People's 7/17/1964 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 None 0 Republic and the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Agreement or other and dry Republics concerning the use of water resources in frontier waters specified season control area(s) 282 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-75 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between Canada 9/16/1964 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 and the United States of America authorizing the Canadian primary or other r entitlement purchase agreement provided for under the treaty agreement specified relating to cooperative development of the water resources of the area(s) Columbia Ri Commission 283 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Unknown South Africa Swaziland Agreement between the Government of the Republic of South 10/13/1964 Primary All waters of 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Africa, Swaziland and the Government of Portugal in regard to Agreement two or more available/not Available/Not Available/N rivers of mutual interest and the Cunene Scheme countries coded Coded ot Coded 284 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Niger Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Agreement concerning the River Niger Commission and the 11/25/1964 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 navigation and transport on the River Niger primary basin(s) Available/Not agreement Coded 285 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Gambia, The Gambia Senegal Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-76 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention between Senegal and Gambia. Bathurst, 18 February, 2/18/1965 Primary Entire named 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 1965 Agreement basin(s) available/not Available/Not Available/N coded Coded ot Coded 287 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Laos, People's Democratic Repu Mekong Thailand Convention between Laos and Thailand for the supply of power 8/12/1965 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement or other specified area(s) 289 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Unknown Germany Exchange of notes constituting an agreement concerning the 5/19/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 infrastructural works on the part of the Saar, with canals, which Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N forms the border. Coded coded Coded ot Coded 290 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Rhine Germany Switzerland Agreement between West Germany, Austria, and Switzerland 4/30/1966 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Prioritization 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 relating to the withdrawal of water from Lake Constance Agreement or other Quantity of uses specified area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels 291 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Myanmar (Burma) Unknown Pakistan Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-77 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the Government of the Union of Burma and 5/9/1966 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on the Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Demarcation of a Fixed Boundary between the two countries in Coded coded Coded ot Coded the Naaf River 293 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement concerning the loan 8/24/1966 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 of waters of the Colorado River for irrigation of lands in the primary or other Quantity quantities, Mexicali Valley agreement specified recoupable area(s) (in later periods if not met) 294 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Nepal Amended agreement between His Majesty's government of Nepal 12/19/1966 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 and the government of India concerning the Kosi Project of a Primary or other r Agreement specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels 295 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Zambezi South Africa Agreement between South Africa and Portugal relating to 4/1/1967 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 hydropower development on the Zambesi River [Untitled] Agreement or other Available/Not Available/N specified Coded ot Coded area(s) 296 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Gambia, The Gambia Senegal Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-78 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty of Association between Senegal and the Gambia 4/19/1967 Primary Entire named 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Agreement basin(s) available/not Available/Not Available/N coded Coded ot Coded 298 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention between the French Republic and the Swiss 8/23/1963 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 Confederation concerning the Emosson hydro-electric facility Agreement or other r specified area(s) Commission Water Prioritization Arbitration Quantity of uses Commission 300 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Roia Italy Franco-Italian convention concerning the supply of water to the 9/28/1967 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 town of Menton Agreement or other Quantity quantities, specified variable ( by area(s) water availability) Diplomatic Channels 301 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile Kenya Sudan Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-79 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement for the Hydrometeorological Survey of Lakes Victoria, 8/17/1967 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Kyogo and Albert (Mobutu Sese Seko) Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 302 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Expansion of Hydrosurvey to Rwanda and Burundi Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 303 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Czech Republic Slovakia Treaty between the Republic of Austria and the Czechoslovak 12/7/1967 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 Socialist Republic concerning the regulation of water management Agreement or other Quantity of flow questions relating to frontier waters specified area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels Prioritization Arbitration of uses Commission Diplomatic Channels 306 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Danube Hungary Slovakia Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-80 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the government of the Czechoslovak Socialist 2/27/1968 Does not fit Sub-basin(s) 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 Republic and the government of the Hungarian People's Republic TFDD or other Available/Not Channels concerning the establishment of a river administration in the Rajka- inclusion specified Coded Gönyü sector of the Danube criteria area(s) Commission 307 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Exchange of notes concerning a special operating programme for 4/1/1968 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Fixed 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 the Duncan and Arrow storages on the Columbia River System primary or other r quantities agreement specified which vary area(s) according to water availability 308 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Niger Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Agreement concerning the Niger River Commission and the 5/15/1968 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Navigation and Transport on the River Niger. Done at Niamey, on of a Primary basin(s) 25 November 1964 [Rectification]. Niamey, 15 May, 1968 Agreement Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-81 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 309 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Guadiana Spain Lima Mino Tagus/Tejo Agreement regulating the use and development of the water 5/29/1968 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation of 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 resources of the international reaches of the rivers Miño, Limia, Agreement or other Quantity entire rivers Tajo, Guadiana, and Chanza and of their tributaries (with specified additional protocol), signed at Madrid area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t Hydropowe Percentage Arbitration r Commission Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-82 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 310 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Gambia, The Gambia Senegal Agreement on the Integrated Development of the Gambia River 7/31/1968 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Basin. Bathurst, 31 July, 1968 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-83 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 311 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Algeria General Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Central African Republic Chad Congo, Democratic Republic of ( Congo, Republic of the (Brazzavi Egypt Ethiopia Gabon Gambia, The Ghana Guinea Ivory Coast Kenya Lesotho Liberia Libya Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Morocco Niger Nigeria Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-84 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Rwanda Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan Swaziland Tanzania, United Republic of Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia African convention on the conservation of nature and natural 9/15/1968 Primary Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 resources Agreement Available/Not Channels Coded Third Party Involvemen t 313 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Maritsa Turkey Agreement between the People’s Republic of Bulgaria and the 10/23/1968 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 Republic of Turkey concerning cooperation in the use of the Agreement two or more waters of rivers flowing through the territory of both countries countries Diplomatic Channels 314 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Unknown Spain Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-85 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Operating status of the Commission created under the Convention 5/22/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 between Spain and Portugal for the Regulation of the use and Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Hydrolic development of the international sections of the rivers Coded coded Coded ot Coded Minho, Lima, Tejo, Guadiana, Chanca and their tributaries 315 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Kunene South Africa Agreement between the government of the Republic of South 1/21/1969 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 None 0 Africa and the government of Portugal in regard to the first phase Agreement or other Quantity quantities and dry of development of the water resource of the Cunene River Basin specified and season control area(s) percentage 316 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Niger Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Agreement concerning the Niger River Commission and the 3/14/1969 Amendment Entire named 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 navigation and transport on the River Niger. Done at Niamey, on to a Primary basin(s) available/not Available/Not Available/N 25 November 1964." Amendment to article 2 of the above said Agreement coded Coded ot Coded agreement 317 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 3/21/1969 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 States of America and Canada for the construction of a temporary Agreement or other cofferdam at Niagara specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-86 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 318 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes constituting an agreement between the United 3/21/1969 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 States of America and Canada for the temporary diversion for primary or other Quantity quantities power purposes of the water normally flowing over the American agreement specified vary Falls at Niagara area(s) according to time of the year Hydropowe Percentage r 319 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Bolivia Brazil Paraguay Uruguay Treaty of the River Plata Basin 4/23/1969 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement basin(s) 320 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Convention between the French Republic and the Federal Republic 7/4/1969 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Arbitration 1 of Germany concerning development of the Rhine between Agreement or other Quantity present but Available/Not Strasbourg/Kehl and Lauterbourg/Neuburgweier specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-87 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 321 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Portugal Zambezi South Africa Agreement to Purchase electricity from Cabora-Bassa Scheme. 9/19/1969 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Lisbon, 19 September, 1969 Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N specified coded Coded ot Coded area(s) 322 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Unknown Netherlands Treaty between the Flemish Region and the Netherlands 5/23/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 concerning water supply from the River Meuse Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 323 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Garonne Spain Exchange of letters constituting an agreement between France 1/27/1970 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Commission 1 and Spain amending the arrangement of 12 July 1958 relating to primary or other Quantity quantities, Lake Lanoux agreement specified recoupable area(s) (in later periods if not met) 324 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Guinea Senegal Mali Mauritania Senegal Convention of Dakar 1/30/1970 Missing Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-88 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 325 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Gambia, The Senegal Guinea Guinea-Bissau Senegal General Scheme for Development of the Senegal River Basin. 30 1/30/1970 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 January 1970 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 326 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Kura-Araks Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Additional Protocol to the Agreement Between Iran and the Union 5/7/1970 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of Soviet Socialist Republics Concerning the Line to be Taken by primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N the New Frontier Between Iran and the Union of Soviet Socialist agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded Republics through the Reservoirs of the Ararex Hyro-Engineerin 327 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Po Switzerland Exchange of letters of 15 June 1970 between Switzerland and Italy 6/15/1970 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 concerning the management of works on the watercourse of the Agreement or other Breggia on the Italian-Swiss border specified area(s) 328 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Rio Grande (North America) United States of America Improvement of the international flood control works of the lower 9/10/1970 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Rio Grande primary or other agreement specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-89 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 329 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Treaty to resolve pending boundary differences and maintain the 11/23/1970 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Rio Grande and Colorado River as the international boundary Agreement or other specified area(s) 330 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Unknown Spain Decree which permits the publication and operation of the Statute 5/24/1905 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of Use of the Spanish-Portuguese Commission to regulate the use primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N and exploitation of the international sections of the rivers Miño, agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded Limia, Tajo, Guadania, and Chanza and their tributaries. 331 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Unknown Greece Accord between the Government of the Kingdom of Greece and 5/24/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 the Government of the People’s Republic of Bulgaria with regards Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N to the creation of a Greco-Bulgarian Commission for cooperation Coded coded Coded ot Coded between the two countries in the areas of electric energy and the u 332 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina Unknown Chile Act of Santiago pertaining to river basins. 5/24/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 333 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) China Yalu Korea, Democratic People's Rep Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-90 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Protocol on work of board of directors and inspectors of North 5/24/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Korea and China Yalu River Hydroelectric Company. Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N text is not available. Title retrieved from Ginsburgs and Kim (1977) Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-91 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 335 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Albania General Algeria Argentina Armenia Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belgium Bolivia Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Canada Chad Chile China Comoros Congo, Democratic Republic of ( Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Ecuador Egypt Estonia Finland France Gabon Germany Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-92 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Ghana Greece Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Ireland Israel Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Latvia Liechtenstein Macedonia Malaysia Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Morocco Namibia Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Zealand Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-93 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Niger Norway Pakistan Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Senegal Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Suriname Sweden Switzerland Togo Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Uganda Union of Soviet Socialist Republi United Kingdom United States of America Uruguay Venezuela Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-94 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Vietnam Yugoslavia (Former) Zambia Convention on wetlands of international importance especially as 2/2/1971 Primary Global 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 waterfowl habitat (Ramsar) 1971 and Protocol 1972 Agreement Available/Not Coded 336 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Agreement to Establish a Commission for the Koma-Dogou-Yobe. 3 3/3/1971 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 March, 1971 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 337 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ecuador Chira Peru Tumbes Agreement for the development of the binational Puyango- 9/27/1971 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Tumbes and Catamayo-Chira basins by Peru and Ecuador (with Agreement basin(s) provisional rules of procedure of the Mixed Peruvian-Ecuadorian Commission for the Puyango-Tumbes and Catamayo-Chira basins). 338 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Exchange of letters constituting an agreement between France 10/21/1971 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 and Switzerland on the implementation of the convention of 16 primary or other November 1962, concerning protection of the waters of Lake agreement specified Geneva against pollution area(s) 340 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Torne/Tornealven Sweden Agreement between Finland and Sweden concerning frontier 12/15/1971 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 Not 0 None 0 waters Agreement or other Quantity of flow Available/Not specified Coded area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-95 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 341 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Romania Danube Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between the government of the Socialist Republic of 12/16/1971 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 Both flood 1 Commission 1 Romania and the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Agreement or other r and dry Republics on the joint construction of the Stinca-Costesti Hydraulic specified season control Engineering Scheme on the River Prut and the establishment of th area(s) Diplomatic Channels Water Percentage Commission Quantity of flow Diplomatic Channels 343 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mali Senegal Mauritania Senegal Convention relating to the statute of the Senegal river 3/11/1972 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Agreement basin(s) Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-96 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 344 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mali Senegal Mauritania Senegal Convention pertaining to the creation of the organization for the 3/11/1972 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Water Consultation 1 None 0 Diplomatic 1 management of the Senegal river, signed at Nouakchott primary basin(s) Quantity Channels agreement Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 345 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Agreement on Great Lakes water quality with annexes and 4/15/1972 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Pollution Fixed 0 None 0 None 0 attachments, signed at Ottawa Agreement or other quantities specified area(s) 346 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Italy Danube Switzerland Po Rhine Convention concerning the protection of Italo-Swiss waters 4/20/1972 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 against pollution, signed at Rome Agreement two or more countries 347 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Ecuador Chira Peru Tumbes Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-97 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Exchange of letters constituting an agreement approving the rules 6/10/1972 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 of procedure of the Mixed Peruvian-Ecuadorian Commission for primary or other the Puyango-Tumbes and Catamayo-Chira basins, as provided for agreement specified in article 16 of the abovementioned Agreement. area(s) 348 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Po Switzerland Convention between Switzerland and Italy relative to the hydraulic 6/23/1972 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 management of the Breggia Torrent at the Italian-Swiss frontier, Agreement or other with annexes, Berne specified area(s) 349 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Vuoksa Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between the government of the Republic of Finland 7/12/1972 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Fixed 1 None 0 Commission 1 and the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Agreement or other r quantities concerning the production of electric power in the part of the specified Vuoksi River bounded by the Imatra and Svetogorsk hydroelectric area(s) statio Diplomatic Channels 350 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Agreement effected by minute no. 241 of the International 7/14/1972 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, of a Primary or other Quantity quantities adopted at El Paso Agreement specified area(s) 351 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Canada St. John (North America) United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-98 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement relating to the establishment of a Canada-United 9/21/1972 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 States committee on water quality in the St. John River and its Agreement basin(s) tributary rivers and streams which cross the Canada-United States boundary, with annex 352 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cameroon Lake Chad Chad Niger Nigeria Agreement establishing the Lake Chad basin Commission 10/22/1972 Financial Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 development fund. Yaounde, 22 October, 1972 agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N related to Coded coded Coded ot Coded international waters 353 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Statute of the Indo-Bangladesh Joint Rivers Commission 11/24/1972 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 Agreement two or more Channels countries 355 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil La Plata Paraguay Treaty between the Federative Republic of Brazil and the Republic 4/26/1973 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Diplomatic 1 of Paraguay concerning the hydroelectric utilization of the water Agreement or other r Channels resources of the Parana River owned in condominium by the two specified countries, from and including the Salto Grande de Sete Quedas area(s) Pollution 0 356 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-99 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement extending minute no. 241 of the International 4/30/1973 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, on primary or other Quantity quantities July 14, 1972, as extended agreement specified area(s) 357 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Niger Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Agreement concerning the Niger River Commission and the 6/15/1973 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Navigation and Transport on the River Niger Revised on 2nd of a Primary basin(s) February, 1968 and 15th June, 1973 Agreement 358 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Mexico-US agreement on the permanent and definitive solution to 8/30/1973 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 the salinity of the Colorado River Basin (International Boundary primary or other Quantity quantities and Water Commission Minute No. 242) agreement specified area(s) 359 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cameroon Lake Chad Chad Niger Nigeria Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-100 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Accord pertaining to the creation of funds for the development of 10/10/1973 Financial Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 the Chad Basin Commission agreement Available/Not Available/Not related to Coded Coded international waters Commission 361 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Volta Burkina Faso Ghana Ivory Coast Mali Niger Togo Agreement governing the operations of the Onchocerciasis Control 11/1/1973 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Programme in the Volta River Basin area. Accra, 1 November, 1973 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 362 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Australia Fly Indonesia Sepik Papua New Guinea Agreement between the government of Australia (acting on its 11/13/1973 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 own behalf and on behalf of the government of Papua New Agreement or other Guinea) and the government of Indonesia concerning specified administrative arrangements as to the border between Papua New area(s) Guinea and Indonesia 363 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Uruguay Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-101 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between Uruguay and Argentina concerning the Rio de la 11/19/1973 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Plata and the corresponding maritime boundary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 364 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Agreement constituting appendix I, relating to gross reductions in 11/21/1973 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 0 None 0 None 0 inputs of phosphorus to Lakes Superior and Huron to the Great primary or other Lakes water quality agreement of 1972 agreement specified area(s) 365 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Paraguay Tratado de Yacyretá 12/3/1973 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Diplomatic 1 Agreement or other r Channels specified area(s) 366 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bhutan Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Agreement Between the Government of India and the Royal 5/27/1905 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of Bhutan regarding the Chukkha Hydroelectric Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N Project. Chukkha Hydroelectric Project; India finances specified coded Coded ot Coded hydroelectric project (60% grant; 40% low interest loan) to be built area(s) in. 367 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil Lagoon Mirim Uruguay Exchange of Notes constituting an Agreement on the Joint 5/20/1974 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Commission for the Development of Mirim Lagoon Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-102 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 368 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mongolia Jenisej/Yenisey Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation 7/3/1974 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the Government of Mongolia on rational management and not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N conservation of river Selenga translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 369 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Unknown Iraq Accord Entre L'Iran et L'Irak Concernant L'Utilisation Des Cours 12/26/1975 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 D'eau Frontaliers Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 370 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Isonzo Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement on the development of economic cooperation 11/10/1975 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 between the Italian Republic and the Socialist Federal Republic of not coded Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Yugoslavia. Coded coded Coded ot Coded 371 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Bulgaria Unknown Turkey Accord pertaining to long term economic, technical, industrial, and 5/28/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 scientific cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Turkey and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bulgaria. Coded coded Coded ot Coded 373 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ecuador Chira Peru Tumbes Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-103 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement for the development of the binational Puyango- 2/26/1975 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Tumbes and Catamayo-Chira Basins by Peru and Ecuador (with of a Primary or other provisional rules of procedure of the Mixed Peruvian-Ecuadorian Agreement specified Commission for the Puyango-Tumbes and Catamayo-Chira Basins). area(s) 374 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cambodia (Kampuchea) Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Thailand Vietnam Joint declaration of principles for utilization of the waters of the 1/31/1975 Primary Entire named 1 Water Prioritization 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 lower Mekong Basin, signed by the representatives of the Agreement basin(s) Quantity of uses governments of Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam to the Committee for Coordination of Investigations of the Lower Mekong Basi 375 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Uruguay Statute of the river Uruguay, signed at Salto 2/26/1975 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Agreement or other specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 376 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-104 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Provisional conclusion of the treaty of 18 April 1975 on the division 4/18/1975 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Not 0 None 0 of the waters of the Ganges Agreement or other Quantity quantities, Available/Not specified variable ( by Coded area(s) water availability) 377 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Iraq Treaty concerning the state frontier and neighbourly relations 6/13/1975 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocating 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 between Iran and Iraq and protocol Agreement or other Quantity time specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels Third Party Involvemen t 378 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Convention between the French Republic and the Federal Republic 7/16/1975 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 of Germany additional to the convention of 4 July 1969 on the primary or other subject of the management of the Rhine between Strasbourg/Kehl agreement specified and Lauterbourg/Neuburgweier, signed at Bonn area(s) Diplomatic Channels 379 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Isonzo Yugoslavia (Former) Agreement on the development of economic co-operation (with 11/10/1975 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 annexes, exchanges of letters and final act), signed at Osimo Agreement or other specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-105 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 380 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Iran Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Iraq Agreement between Iran and Iraq concerning the use of frontier 12/26/1975 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Consultation 1 None 0 Commission 1 watercourses, and protocol Agreement or other Quantity specified area(s) Percentage of flow 381 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Norway Unknown Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between Norway and the Russian Federation 5/29/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 concerning water abstraction by Norway from the upper Reservoir Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N of the Borisoglebsk Hydropower plant at the transboundary river Coded coded Coded ot Coded Pasvik 382 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Guadiana Spain Mino Second additional to the agreement of 29 May 1968 between 2/12/1976 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Spain and Portugal regulating the use and development of the primary or other water resources of the international reaches of the rivers Miño, agreement specified Limia, Tajo, Guadiana and Chanza and of their tributaries area(s) 384 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Germany Rhine Luxembourg Agreement between the government of the Federal Republic of 9/14/1976 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Germany and the government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg primary or other concerning the maintenance, restoration and operation of the agreement specified section of the Moselle common to the two states area(s) Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-106 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 385 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland Convention on the protection of the Rhine against pollution by 12/3/1976 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Pollution Fixed 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 chlorides (with annexes and exchanges of letters dated 1983), primary basin(s) quantities concluded at Bonn agreement Diplomatic Channels 386 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) European Economic Community Rhine France Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland Convention on the protection of the Rhine against chemical 12/3/1976 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 pollution primary basin(s) agreement Diplomatic Channels 388 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Agreement concerning the activities of agencies for the control of 5/5/1977 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 accidental water pollution by hydrocarbones or other substances Agreement or other capable of contaminating water and recognized as such under the specified Convention of 16 November 1962 between France and Switzerlan area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-107 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 390 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Brazil Lagoon Mirim Uruguay Treaty on cooperation for the utilization of the natural resources 7/7/1977 Replacement Entire named 1 Water Percentage 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 and the development of the Mirim Lagoon basin (Treaty of the of a Primary basin(s) Quantity of flow Mirim Lagoon basin) and Protocol (Jaguarão River Protocol) Agreement Commission Diplomatic Channels 392 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Burundi Nile Rwanda Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Agreement for the establishment of the organization for the 8/24/1977 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 management and development of the Kagera river basin (with Agreement basin(s) attached map), Concluded at Rusumo, Rwanda Diplomatic Channels 393 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Danube Hungary Slovakia Agreement Concerning Mutual Assistance in the Construction of 9/16/1977 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Diplomatic 1 the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros system of locks Agreement or other Channels specified area(s) 394 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-108 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the government of the People's Republic of 11/5/1977 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Dry Season 1 Commission 1 Bangladesh and the government of the Republic of India on Agreement or other Quantity quantities Control sharing of the Ganges waters at Farakka and on augmenting its specified vary flows area(s) according to time of the year Diplomatic Channels Percentage Commission of flow Diplomatic Channels 395 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Unknown Slovenia Agreement concerning co-operation on water management of 5/31/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 frontier waters between Italy and Slovenia Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 396 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Laos, People's Democratic Repu Mekong Thailand Vietnam Declaration concerning the Interim Committee for Coordination of 1/5/1978 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Investigation of the Lower Mekong Basin Agreement basin(s) 397 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Nepal Agreement between Nepal and India on the renovation and 4/7/1978 Missing Not 0 Water Fixed 1 Not 0 None 0 extension of Chandra Canal, Pumped Canal, and distribution of the Available/Not Quantity quantities Available/Not Western Kosi Canal Coded Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-109 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 398 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Burundi Nile Rwanda Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Amendment to the Agreement for the Establishment of an 5/19/1978 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Organization to Manage and Develop The Kagera River Basin. 19 primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N May, 1978 agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 399 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Unknown United States of America Exchange of Notes, concluded on June 19, 1978 with attached 6/19/1978 Primary All waters of 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Memorandum of Understanding between the Environmental Agreement two or more available/not Available/Not Available/N Protection Agency of the United States and the Subsecretariat for countries coded Coded ot Coded Environmental Improvement of Mexico for Coopera-tion on Environmental Progr 400 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Gambia, The Gambia Guinea Senegal Convention relating to the creation of the Gambia River Basin 6/30/1978 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 Development Organization primary basin(s) Channels agreement Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-110 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 401 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Gambia, The Gambia Guinea Senegal Convention relating to the status of the River Gambia 6/30/1978 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 Agreement basin(s) Available/Not Channels Coded Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 402 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bolivia Amazon Brazil Colombia Ecuador Guyana Peru Suriname Venezuela Treaty for Amazonian cooperation 7/3/1978 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement basin(s) 403 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Guinea Corubal Guinea-Bissau Protocol of the agreement between the Republic of Guinea and 10/21/1978 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 the Republic of Guinea-Bissau on the management of the Koliba- Agreement basin(s) Channels Korubal river Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-111 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 404 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America 1978 agreement between the United States and Canada on Great 11/22/1978 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Lakes water quality of a Primary basin(s) Agreement 405 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mali Senegal Mauritania Senegal Convention concluded between Mali, Mauritania, and Senegal 12/21/1978 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 relative to the legal statute of common works primary basin(s) Channels agreement Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 406 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Exchange of notes between the government of Canada and the 6/19/1979 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 government of the United States of America constituting an primary or other agreement with respect of article I of the convention between agreement specified Canada and the United States of America to regulate the level of area(s) the Lake o 407 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mali Senegal Mauritania Senegal Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-112 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement Establishing a Permanent Joint Technical Committee. 8/18/1979 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 18 August, 1979 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 408 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Recommendations for the soluction to the border sanitation 9/24/1979 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 problems primary or other agreement specified area(s) 409 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Brazil Paraguay Agreement on Paraná River projects 10/19/1979 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 Agreement or other Quantity quantities specified and area(s) percentage 410 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) South Africa Senegal Swaziland Amendments To The Convention Concerning The Status Of The 12/11/1979 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Senegal River And Convention Establishing The Senegal River Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Development Organization. 11 December 1979 Coded coded Coded ot Coded 411 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Naatamo Norway Pasvik Tana Torne/Tornealven Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-113 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement on a Finnish-Norwegian Transboundary Water 11/5/1980 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Commission Agreement or other specified area(s) 413 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Rhine Luxembourg Convention between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Grand- 3/17/1980 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Duchy of Luxembourg on the subject of the water of the Sûre Agreement or other specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels 414 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Brazil Treaty between the government of the Argentine Republic and the 5/17/1980 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Diplomatic 1 government of the Federal Republic of Brazil for the development Agreement or other r Channels of the water resources contained in the border reaches of the specified Uruguay river and its effluent, the Pepiri-Guazu river area(s) 415 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Unknown Germany Luxembourg Exchange of Letters constituting an Agreement concerning 10/16/1980 Does not fit Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 German-French-Luxembourg co-operation in the frontier areas TFDD Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N inclusion Coded coded Coded ot Coded criteria 417 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-114 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the government of the French Republic and 11/20/1980 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the Federal Council of Switzerland, on behalf of the Canton of primary basin(s) Geneva on the dephosphatization of Lake Leman waters agreement 418 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Niger Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Convention creating the Niger Basin Authority 11/21/1980 Amendment Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Commission 1 to a Primary basin(s) and dry Agreement season control 419 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Mino Spain Fishing regulations applicable in the international section of the 12/3/1980 Does not fit Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Minho River (with Annex) TFDD Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N inclusion Coded coded Coded ot Coded criteria 420 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Burundi Nile Rwanda Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Accession of Uganda to the agreement pertaining to the creation 5/18/1981 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 of the organization for the management and development of the primary basin(s) Available/Not Kagera river basin agreement Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-115 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 422 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Gambia, The Gambia Guinea Senegal Amendment To The Convention Relating To The Status Of The 6/6/1981 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 River Gambia And The Convention Relating To The Creation Of The primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Gambia River Basin Development Organization. 6 June, 1981 agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 423 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Schelde France Convention between the French Republic and the Kingdom of 2/3/1982 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Belgium concerning improvement of the common River Lys Agreement or other Available/Not between Deulemont and Menin [alt. Menen] specified Coded area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels 424 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Indo-Bangladesh memorandum of understanding on the sharing of 10/7/1982 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Commission 1 Ganga waters at Farakka of a Primary or other Quantity quantities Agreement specified and area(s) percentage Diplomatic Channels 426 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-116 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention between the French Republic and the Federal Republic 12/6/1982 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 of Germany modifying and completing the additional convention primary or other of 16 July 1975 to the convention of 4 July 1969 on the subject of agreement specified the management of the Rhine between Strasbourg/Kehl and Lauter area(s) Diplomatic Channels 427 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Unknown Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Modification of the Agreement between the government of the 6/5/1905 Amendment Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Republic of Finland and the government of the Union of Soviet to a Primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Socialist Republics concerning the production of electric power in Agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded the part of the Vuoksi River bounded by the Imatra and Svetogorsk 428 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mozambique Incomati South Africa Limpopo Swaziland Maputo Umbeluzi Agreement between the government of the Republic of South 2/17/1983 Primary All waters of 1 Water Consultation 1 Dry Season 1 None 0 Africa, the government of the Kingdom of Swaziland and the Agreement two or more Quantity Control government of the People's Republic of Mozambique relative to countries the establishment of a tripartite permanent technical committee 431 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Brazil Decree No. 88.441 promulgating the agreement for water 6/29/1983 Not a treaty Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 resources exploitation within the Uruguai river and its effluent the Available/Not Available/Not Channels Pepiri-Guacu river, between the government of the Federal Coded Coded Republic of Brazil and the government of the Argentine Republic 432 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-117 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement on ad hoc sharing of the Teesta waters between India 7/20/1983 Primary Entire named 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 and Bangladesh reached during the 25th meeting of the Indo- Agreement basin(s) Quantity of flow Bangladesh Joint Rivers Commission held in July 1983, at Dhaka 433 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Tijuana Yaqui Agreement between the United States of America and the United 8/14/1983 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Mexican States on cooperation for the protection and of a Primary or other improvement of the environment in the border area Agreement specified area(s) 434 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Supplementary agreement amending the agreement between 10/16/1983 Replacement Entire named 1 0 None 0 None 0 Canada and the United States of America on Great Lakes water of a Primary basin(s) quality, 1978 Agreement 435 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Brazil Exchange of Notes constituting an Agreement on delimitation of 10/20/1983 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 the frontier along the thalweg on the Uruguay River in the area of Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N the Basic Garabi Development Project Coded coded Coded ot Coded 437 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Niger Agreement concerning the Niger River Commission and the 1/13/1984 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal Not 0 None 0 None 0 Navigation and Transport on the River Niger. Done at Niamey, on of a Primary basin(s) available/not 25 November 1964 [Partial Termination]. 13 January, 1984 Agreement coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-118 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 438 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Bolivia Amazon Brazil Agreement concerning the Cachuela Esperanza hydroelectric 2/8/1984 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 plant, supplementary to the agreement on economic and technical primary or other co-operation between the government of the Federative Republic agreement specified of Brazil and the government of the Republic of Bolivia area(s) 439 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. John (North America) United States of America Exchange of notes between the government of Canada and the 2/22/1984 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 government of the United States of America constituting an primary or other agreement regarding the continued preservation and agreement specified enhancement of the water quality in the international section of area(s) the Saint John River 440 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Skagit United States of America Treaty between the United States of America and Canada relating 4/2/1984 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 to the Skagit River and Ross Lake, and the Seven Mile Reservoir on Agreement or other Quantity quantities the Pend D’Oreille River specified area(s) 441 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mozambique Zambezi Portugal South Africa Agreement between the governments of the Republic of Portugal, 5/2/1984 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 None 0 the People's Republic of Mozambique and the Republic of South of a Primary or other and dry Africa relative to the Cahora Bassa Project Agreement specified season control area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-119 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 444 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Tijuana United States of America Recommendations for the first stage treatment and disposal 4/30/1985 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Pollution Allocation of 0 None 0 None 0 facilities for the solution of the border sanitation problem at San primary or other entire rivers Diego, California-Tijuana, Baja California agreement specified area(s) 445 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Tijuana Yaqui Agreement of cooperation between the United States of America 7/18/1985 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 and the United Mexican States regarding pollution of the primary or other environment along the inland international boundary by agreement specified discharges of hazardous substances area(s) 447 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Fenney India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Karnaphuli Summary record of discussions of the first meeting of the Joint 1/18/1986 Semi- Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Committee of Experts held in Dhaka between 16-18 January, 1986 international Available/Not Available/Not treaty Coded Coded 449 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Luxembourg Convention between the government of the French Republic and 3/12/1986 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 the government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg for the Agreement or other realization and exploitation of certain industrial settlements on specified the Moselle area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-120 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention between the government of the French Republic and 3/12/1986 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 the government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg for the Agreement or other Channels realization and exploitation of certain industrial settlements on specified the Moselle area(s) 450 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Italy Unknown Switzerland Convention between the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of 3/19/1986 Does not fit Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Italy regarding fisheries in the Italo-Swiss waters TFDD Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N inclusion Coded coded Coded ot Coded criteria 451 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Luxembourg Exchange of notes constituting an agreement concerning the 6/23/1986 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 execution of improvement works on the River Gander at Mondorff Agreement or other (France) and at Mondorf-les-Bains (Luxembourg), Paris, 3 and 23 specified June 1986 area(s) 452 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Hungary Danube Romania Treaty between the government of Romania and the government 6/25/1986 Available but Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 of Hungary on the regulation of water problems in watercourses not Available/Not Available/Not forming or crossing the boundary translated to Coded Coded English 453 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lesotho Orange South Africa Treaty on the Lesotho Highlands Water Project between the 10/24/1986 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 government of the Republic of South Africa and the government of Agreement or other Quantity quantities and dry the Kingdom of Lesotho specified season control area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-121 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty on the Lesotho Highlands Water Project between the 10/24/1986 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 Commission 1 government of the Republic of South Africa and the government of Agreement or other Quantity quantities and dry the Kingdom of Lesotho specified season control area(s) Diplomatic Channels Fixed Arbitration quantities, recoupable (in later periods if not met) Commission Diplomatic Channels 454 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention instituting the Council of Lake Geneva 2/19/1987 Semi- Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 international Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N treaty Coded coded Coded ot Coded 455 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Guatemala Candelaria Mexico Coatan Achute Grijalva Hondo Suchiate Agreement between the United Mexican States and the Republic 4/10/1987 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 of Guatemala on the protection and improvement of the Agreement or other environment in the border area specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-122 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 456 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Botswana Zambezi Mozambique Tanzania, United Republic of Zambia Zimbabwe Agreement on the action plan for the environmentally sound 5/28/1987 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 management of the common Zambesi River System Agreement basin(s) 457 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Convention instituting the Council of Léman Lausanne, 19 6/10/1987 Semi- Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 February 1987 and exchange of letters of 10 June 1987 international Available/Not Available/Not treaty Coded Coded 458 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Zambia Zambezi Zimbabwe Agreement between the Republic of Zimbabwe and the Republic 7/28/1987 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Percentage 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 of Zambia concerning the utilization of the Zambesi River Agreement or other r specified area(s) 459 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Uruguay Cooperation Agreement between the Republic of Argentina and 9/16/1987 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the Oriental Republic of Uruguay to prevent and fight against Agreement or other pollution incidents of the aquatic environment produced by specified hydrocarbons and other noxious substances area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-123 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 460 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Luxembourg Agreement between the government of the French Republic, the 10/1/1987 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 government of the Federal Republic of Germany, and the Agreement basin(s) government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on flood warning for the catchment basin of the Moselle 461 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Algeria Niger Benin Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Revised financial procedures of the Niger Basin Authority, done at 10/27/1987 Financial Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Ndjamena agreement Available/Not Available/Not related to Coded Coded international waters Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-124 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 462 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Benin Niger Burkina Faso Cameroon Chad Guinea Ivory Coast Mali Niger Nigeria Revised convention pertaining to the creation of the Niger Basin 10/29/1987 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Authority, signed at N'Djamena of a Primary basin(s) Agreement Diplomatic Channels 463 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Rio Grande (North America) United States of America Boundary waters agreement between the United States of 11/10/1987 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 America and Mexico of 1987 primary or other agreement specified area(s) 464 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Protocol amending the 1978 agreement between the United 11/18/1987 Amendment Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 States of American and Canada on Great Lakes water quality, as to a Primary basin(s) amended on 16.10.1983 Agreement Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-125 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 465 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Austria Danube European Economic Community Germany Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the 12/1/1987 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 European Economic Community, on the one hand, and the Agreement or other Republic of Austria, on the other, on cooperation on managemnet specified of water resources in the Danube Basin, Regensburg area(s) Diplomatic Channels 466 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Nestos Greece Minutes of the Greek- Bulgarian Committee for the use of waters 3/16/1988 Available but Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 of the Nestos river not Available/Not Available/Not Available/N translated to Coded Coded ot Coded English 467 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Brazil General Venezuela Agreement between the Government of the Federative Republic 5/17/1988 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 of Brazil and the Government of the Republic of Venezuela on the Agreement or other establishment of a non-aedificandi zone at the boundary between specified the two countries. area(s) 468 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mali Niger Niger Protocol of the agreement between the Republic of Niger and the 7/12/1988 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Republic of Mali relative to cooperation in the utilization of Agreement basin(s) resources in water of the Niger river Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-126 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 469 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Bolivia Amazon Brazil Exchange of notes constituting an agreement for the construction 8/2/1988 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 of a hydroelectric plant in Cachuela Esperanza, supplementary to primary or other the agreement on economic and technical cooperation agreement specified area(s) 471 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Nelson-Saskatchewan United States of America Exchange of notes between the government of Canada and the 8/30/1988 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 government of the United States of America constituting an Agreement or other agreement concerning the construction of a joint ring levee specified area(s) 472 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bolivia Amazon Brazil Brazil and Bolivia Exchange of Notes Constituting an Agreement 8/2/1988 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 for the Construction of a Hydroelectric Plant in Cachuela Espe- Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N ranza Coded coded Coded ot Coded 473 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Unknown Norway Agreement on joint rules for the River Tana fishing area between 6/11/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Finland and Norway Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 474 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Finland Unknown Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-127 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Finland 6/11/1905 Amendment Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the Government of the Union of Socialist Republics to a Primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N concerning the regulations governing Lake Saimaa and the Vuoksi Agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded River. 475 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iraq Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Syria Law No.14 of 1990, ratifying the Joint Minutes concerning the 4/17/1989 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 provisional division of the waters of the Euphrates River Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) 476 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Botswana Limpopo South Africa Agreement on the Establishment of the Joint Permanent 6/1/1989 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Commission for Cooperation Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 477 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lesotho Orange South Africa Agreement on the Establishment and Operation of a Common 6/12/1989 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Works Area at the Caledon River for the Purpose of the primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Implementation of the Lesotho Highland Water Project. 12 June, agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1989 478 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Costa Rica Unknown El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-128 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement for the creation of the regional coordinating 10/23/1989 Protocol to a Regional 0 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 committee of potable water and sanitation institutions of Central primary America, Panama, and the Dominican Republic (CAPRE) agreement Diplomatic Channels 480 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Canada Mississippi United States of America Agreement between the government of Canada and the 10/24/1989 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 government of the United States of America for water supply and Agreement or other flood control in the Souris River Basin specified area(s) Commission 481 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Germany Rhine Switzerland Agreement between the government of the Land 5/17/1990 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Badenwurttemberg and the Swiss Federal Council concerning the Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N joint construction and operation of a monitoring and control Coded coded Coded ot Coded station downstream of Basel to monitor the water quality of the River Rhine 482 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Tijuana United States of America Boundary waters: San Diego, California/Tijuana, Baja California. 7/2/1990 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Minute No. 283 of the International Boundary and Water primary or other Commission, United States of America and Mexico. agreement specified area(s) 483 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Niger Niger Nigeria Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-129 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the 7/18/1990 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Republic of Niger concerning the equitable sharing in the Agreement two or more development, conservation and use of their common water countries resources Third Party Involvemen t 484 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Angola Kunene Namibia Agreement In Regard To The Development And Utilization Of The 9/18/1990 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Water Potential Of The Kunene River. 18 September, 1990 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 485 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Angola Unknown Namibia Agreement On General Cooperation And The Creation Of The 9/18/1990 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Angolan-Namibian Joint Commission Of Cooperation. 18 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N September, 1990 Coded coded Coded ot Coded 486 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Elbe European Economic Community Germany Slovakia Convention on the international commission for the protection of 10/8/1990 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the Elbe Agreement basin(s) 487 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Botswana Okavango Namibia Orange Zambezi Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-130 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement Between the Government of Botswana and the 11/13/1990 Primary All waters of 1 Water Unclear 1 None 0 Diplomatic 1 Republic of Namibia on the Establishment of a Joint Water Agreement two or more Quantity Channels Commission. Windhoek, 13 November, 1990 countries 491 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mozambique Incomati South Africa Swaziland Tripartite permanent technical committee ministerial meeting of 2/15/1991 Primary Entire named 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 ministers responsible for water affairs. Agreement basin(s) Quantity quantities, recoupable (in later periods if not met) 492 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Brazil Chuy Uruguay La Plata Lagoon Mirim Complementary agreement to the basic scientific and technical 3/11/1991 Protocol to a All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 cooperation agreement between the government of the Eastern primary two or more Republic of Uruguay and the Federal Republic of Brazil on agreement countries cooperation in the area of water resources 493 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil La Plata Uruguay Agreement of cooperation between the government of the 3/11/1991 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Eastern Republic of Uruguay and the Federal Republic of Brazil for Agreement basin(s) the use of natural resources and the development of the basin of the Cuareim river 494 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-131 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement concerning the practice of fishing and the protection of 7/29/1991 Does not fit Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 aquatic habitats in the part of the Doubs constituting a frontier TFDD Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N between the two states inclusion Coded coded Coded ot Coded criteria 495 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina Unknown Chile Treaty on the Environment between the Republic of Chile and the 8/2/1991 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Republic of Argentina Agreement two or more countries 496 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland Additional protocol to the convention on the protection of the 9/25/1991 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Pollution Fixed 0 None 0 None 0 Rhine against pollution from chlorides primary basin(s) quantities agreement 497 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Unknown Greece Joint Protocol (between Greece and Bulgaria) 11/1/1991 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 498 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lesotho Orange South Africa Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-132 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Protocol IV to the treaty on the Lesotho Highlands Water Project: 11/19/1991 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 supplementary arrangements regarding phase IA primary or other agreement specified area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels 501 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Elbe European Economic Community Germany Protocol to the convention of 8 October 1990 between the 12/9/1991 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Czech primary basin(s) and Slovak Federal Republic and the European Economic agreement Community on the International Commission for the protection of the Elbe Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-133 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 502 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Czech Republic General Denmark Estonia European Community European Economic Community Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Ukraine Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the 4/9/1992 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Baltic Sea Agreement two or more countries Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 503 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lithuania Neman Poland Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-134 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Bilateral agreement between the Lithuanian Department of 1/24/1992 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Environment and the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Agreement or other Nature, Conservation and Forestry of Poland specified area(s) 504 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Agreement between the Republic of Kazakhstan, Republic of 2/18/1992 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Uzbekistan, Republic of Tajikistan and Agreement two or more Turkmenistan on Cooperation in the Area of Joint Management, countries Utilization and Protection of Interstate Water Resources Commission Diplomatic Channels 505 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) South Africa Incomati Swaziland Treaty on the development and utilisation of the water resources 3/13/1992 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Dry Season 1 Arbitration 1 of the Komati River Basin between the government of the Agreement or other Quantity quantities, Control Kingdom of Swaziland and the government of the Republic of specified recoupable South Africa area(s) (in later periods if not met) Diplomatic Channels Fixed Arbitration quantities, variable ( by water availability) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-135 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty on the development and utilisation of the water resources 3/13/1992 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Dry Season 1 Diplomatic 1 of the Komati River Basin between the government of the Agreement or other Quantity quantities, Control Channels Kingdom of Swaziland and the government of the Republic of specified variable ( by South Africa area(s) water availability) 506 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) South Africa Incomati Swaziland Maputo Treaty on the establishment and functioning of the joint water 3/13/1992 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Consultation 1 Dry Season 1 Diplomatic 1 commission between the government of the Republic of South primary or other Quantity Control Channels Africa and the government of the Kingdom of Swaziland agreement specified area(s) Third Party Involvemen t 507 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown General Convention on the protection and use of transboundary 3/17/1992 Primary Global 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 watercourses and international lakes Agreement Available/Not Coded Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 508 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Germany Oder/Odra Poland Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the 5/19/1992 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Allocation of 1 Both flood 1 None 0 Republic of Poland on cooperation in the field of water Agreement or other Quantity entire rivers and dry management at border waters specified season control area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-136 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 509 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Kazakhstan Ob Russia Oral/Ural Volga Agreement between the government of the Republic of 8/27/1992 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Kazakhstan and the government of the Russian Federation not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N concerning the joint use and protection of transboundary waters translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 510 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lesotho Orange South Africa Ancillary agreement to the deed of undertaking and relevant 8/31/1992 Financial Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 agreements entered into between the Lesotho Highlands agreement Available/Not Available/Not Development Authority and the government of the Republic of related to Coded Coded South Africa international waters Diplomatic Channels 511 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Namibia Orange South Africa Agreement between the government of the Republic of Namibia 9/14/1992 Primary All waters of 1 Water Consultation 1 Dry Season 1 Commission 1 and the government of the Republic of South Africa on the Agreement two or more Quantity Control establishment of a permanent water commission countries Diplomatic Channels 512 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) South Africa Incomati Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-137 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement on the development and utilisation of the resources of 10/7/1992 Not a treaty Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Arbitration 1 the Komati River Basin between the government of the Republic of or other Quantity present but Available/Not South Africa and the government of KaNgwane specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses Diplomatic Channels 513 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Russia Dnieper Ukraine Don Agreement between the government of the Russian Federation 10/19/1992 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the government of Ukraine concerning the joint use and not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N protection of transboundary waters translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 515 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Rio Grande (North America) United States of America International Boundary and Water Commission – minute No. 289 – 11/13/1992 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 observation of the quality of the waters along the United States primary or other and Mexico border agreement specified area(s) 516 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Danube Slovakia Oder/Odra Vistula/Wista Treaty between the Czech Republic Government and the Slovak 11/23/1992 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 Republic government on mutual relations and principles of Agreement two or more cooperation in agriculture, food industry, forestry, and water countries economy under the conditions of the customs union Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-138 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 517 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Agreement on joint activities in addressing the Aral Sea and the 3/26/1993 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 zone around the Sea crisis, improving the environment, and Agreement basin(s) ensuring the social and economic development of the Aral Sea region 518 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Namibia Orange South Africa Agreement on the Vioolsdrift and Noordoewer Joint Irrigation 4/26/1992 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Scheme Between the Government of the Republic of South Africa Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N and the Government of the Republic of Namibia. Pretoria, 26 April, Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1993 520 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Bolivia Lake Titicaca-Poopo System Peru Notas reversales related to the creation of the Autonomous 6/21/1993 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Binational Authority of the basin of the Lake Titicaca, Desaguadero Agreement or other river, Lake Poopó, Coipasa Salt Pan system specified area(s) 521 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Nile Ethiopia Framework for general co-operation between the Arab Republic of 7/1/1993 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Egypt and Ethiopia Agreement basin(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-139 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 522 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Tijuana Agreement between the Government of the United States of 11/18/1993 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 America and the Government of the United Mexican States Agreement or other concerning the establishment of a Border Environment specified Cooperation Commission and a North American Development Bank area(s) Diplomatic Channels 523 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Namibia Unknown South Africa Agreement between the government of the Republic of South 3/1/1994 Primary All waters of 1 Water Allocation of 1 Flood Control 1 None 0 Africa and the government of the Republic of Namibia on water Agreement two or more Quantity entire rivers related matters pertaining to the incorporation of Walvis Bay in countries the territory of the Republic of Namibia 524 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina Unknown Bolivia Tratado sobre medio ambiente 3/17/1994 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement two or more countries 525 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Maritsa Greece Nestos Struma Agreed minutes of the first meeting of the Greek-Bulgarian joint 4/22/1994 Financial Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Not 0 programming and follow-up Committee agreement Available/Not Available/Not Available/N related to Coded Coded ot Coded international waters Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-140 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 526 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Rhine France Netherlands Agreement on the protection of the Meuse 4/26/1994 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Agreement basin(s) Available/Not Coded 527 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Belgium Schelde France Netherlands Agreement on the protection of the Scheldt 4/26/1994 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 528 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) China Amur Mongolia Har Us Nur Ob Pu Lun T'o Agreement between the government of the People's Republic of 4/29/1994 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Consultation 1 Flood Control 1 Diplomatic 1 China and the government of Mongolia on the protection and Agreement or other Quantity Channels utilization of transboundary waters specified area(s) 529 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Amur Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement between the the Government of the Russian 5/27/1994 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Federation and the Government of the People's Republic of China not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N concerning co-operation in the sphere of protection, regulation translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded and reproduction of living water resources in transboundary English waters of Amur Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-141 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 530 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Croatia Danube Hungary Agreement between the government of the Republic of Croatia 6/10/1994 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the government of the Republic of Hungary on water not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N management relations translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 531 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Austria Danube Bulgaria Croatia European Union Germany Hungary Moldova Romania Slovakia Ukraine Convention on cooperation for the protection and sustainable use 6/29/1994 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Dry Season 1 Arbitration 1 of the River Danube Agreement basin(s) Control Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 532 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kenya Nile Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-142 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention for the establishment of the Lake Victoria Fisheries 6/30/1994 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Organization with annex and final act Agreement basin(s) Diplomatic Channels 533 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Minute no. 291 of the International Boundary and Water 7/16/1994 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Commission, U.S.A. and Mexico, concerning improvements to the primary or other conveying capacity of the international boundary segment of the agreement specified Colorado River area(s) 534 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kenya Nile Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Agreement to initiate program to strengthen regional coordination 8/5/1994 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 in management of resources of Lake Victoria Agreement basin(s) Available/Not Coded 535 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Paraguay Agreement through exchange of notes constituting the Statute of 8/5/1994 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 the Bi-National Commission for the Pilcomayo Lower Basin Agreement or other between the Republic of Argentina and the Republic of Paraguay specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels 536 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Angola Okavango Botswana Namibia Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-143 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the governments of the Republic of Angola, 9/16/1994 Primary Entire named 1 Water Consultation 1 None 0 Diplomatic 1 the Republic of Botswana, and the Republic of Namibia on the Agreement basin(s) Quantity Channels establishment of a permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission (OKACOM) 537 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lebanon Asi/Orontes Syria Agreement between Lebanon and Syria on the distribution of 9/20/1994 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Not 0 None 0 water of Al-Asi River rising in Lebanon Agreement or other Quantity quantities, Available/Not specified variable ( by Coded area(s) water availability) 538 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Israel Jordan Jordan Lebanon Syria Treaty of peace between the state of Israel and the Hashemite 10/26/1994 Primary All waters of 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 Commission 1 Kingdom of Jordan, done at Arava/Araba crossing point Agreement two or more Quantity quantities and dry countries vary season control according to time of the year 539 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Moldova Danube Ukraine Dniester Kogilnik Sarata Agreement between the government of the Republic of Moldova 11/23/1994 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the government of Ukraine on the joint use and protection of not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N transboundary waters translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-144 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 540 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Czech Republic Elbe Germany Agreement between the German Ministry for Environment, 12/19/1994 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Pollution Fixed 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Nature Protection, and Nuclear Security and the Czech Republic Agreement or other quantities Ministry for Environment on the realization of common pilot specified projects for the environmental protection ("urban water area(s) treatment in northern Diplomatic Channels 542 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Tijuana Yaqui Minute 294: Facilities planning program for the solution of border 11/24/1995 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 sanitation problems. primary or other agreement specified area(s) 543 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Bolivia Paraguay Agreement constituting the trilateral commission for the 2/9/1995 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 development of the Pilcomayo river basin Agreement basin(s) Channels 544 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mongolia Amur Russia Har Us Nur Jenisej/Yenisey Lake Ubsa-Nur Pu Lun T'o Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-145 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the government of Mongolia and the 2/11/1995 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 government of the Russian Federation on the protection and use not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N of transboundary waters translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 545 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Resolution of the heads of states of Central Asia on work of the EC 3/3/1995 Not a treaty Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 of ICAS on implementation of action plan on improvement of Available/Not ecological situation in the Aral Sea Basin for the 3-5 years to come Coded with consideration for social and economic development of t 546 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cambodia (Kampuchea) Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Thailand Vietnam Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of 4/5/1995 Replacement Entire named 1 Water Consultation 1 Flood Control 1 Commission 1 the Mekong River Basin of a Primary basin(s) Quantity Agreement Diplomatic Channels 547 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Byelarus Daugava Lithuania Neman Agreement between the Ministry of Natural Resources and 4/14/1995 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Environmental Protection of the Republic of Belarus and the not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Environmental Protection Ministry of the Republic of Lithuania on translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded cooperation in the field of environmental protection English Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-146 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 548 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Unknown General Protocol on shared watercouses in the Southern African 5/16/1995 Primary Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Development Community (SADC) region Agreement Available/Not Coded 549 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Bolivia Paraguay Agreement for the multiple uses of the resources of the upper 6/9/1995 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 basin of the Bermejo river and the Grande de Tarija river primary or other agreement specified area(s) Commission 550 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Latvia Lielupe Lithuania Extension of the Agreement on Enviornomental Management of 7/21/1995 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the Lielupe River Basin primary basin(s) agreement Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-147 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 551 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Angola General Botswana Lesotho Malawi Mozambique Namibia South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, United Republic of Zambia Zimbabwe Protocol on shared watercourse systems in the Southern African 8/28/1995 Primary Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 Development community (SADC) region Agreement Available/Not Coded 552 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Israel Jordan Israeli-Palestinian interim agreement on the West Bank and the 9/28/1995 Semi- Not 0 Water Fixed 1 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Gaza Strip, with Annexes I to VII international Available/Not Quantity quantities Available/Not treaty Coded Coded Commission Diplomatic Channels 553 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Israel Jordan Annex I to the Israeli-Palestinian interim agreement on the West 9/28/1995 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Bank and the Gaza Strip: protocol concerning redeployment and primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N security arrangements agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-148 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 554 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Israel Jordan Annex II to the Israeli-Palestinian interim agreement on the West 9/28/1995 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Bank and the Gaza Strip: protocol concerning elections primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 555 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Israel Jordan Annex III to the Israeli-Palestinian interim agreement on the West 9/28/1995 Protocol to a All waters of 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Bank and the Gaza Strip: protocol concerning civil affairs primary two or more available/not Available/Not Available/N agreement countries coded Coded ot Coded 556 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Israel Jordan Annexes IV, V, VI, and VII to the Israeli-Palestinian interim 9/28/1995 Protocol to a Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 557 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Elbe Germany Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Czech 12/12/1995 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Republic concerning the management of border waters Agreement or other specified area(s) 558 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Nestos Greece Agreement between the Government of Hellenic Republic and the 12/22/1995 Available but Not 0 Water Percentage 1 Not 0 Commission 1 Government of the Republic of Bulgaria for the use of the Nestos not Available/Not Quantity of flow Available/Not River waters translated to Coded Coded English Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-149 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 560 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Kazakhstan Ob Russia Protocol on joint use and protection of transboundary water 6/18/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 bodies and coordination of water management in the Tobol River Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Basin. Agreement text is not available. Coded coded Coded ot Coded 561 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mozambique Incomati South Africa Limpopo Maputo Umbeluzi Joint Water Commission terms of reference 1/1/1996 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Diplomatic 1 Agreement two or more and dry Channels countries season control 562 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Estonia Unknown Russia Agreement between Council of Ministers-the Government of 1/11/1996 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Russian Federation and the Government of Estonia on not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N collaboration in field of environmental protection translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 563 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Nepal Treaty between His Majesty's government of Nepal and the 2/12/1996 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 government of India concerning the integrated development of Agreement or other Quantity quantities the Mahakali River including Sarada Barrage, Tanakpur Barrage, specified and Pancheshwar Project area(s) Commission Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-150 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 564 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Czech Republic Oder/Odra European Union Germany Poland Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany, the Czech 4/11/1996 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Republic and the Republic of Poland on protection of the Oder Agreement basin(s) river from pollution 565 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Unknown Poland Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Poland 5/19/1996 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the Government of the Czech Republic on Cooperation on Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Transboundary Waters Coded coded Coded ot Coded 567 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Rhine France Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland Convention concerning the collection, storage, and discharge of 9/9/1996 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 waste from ships navigating along the Rhine and other inland Agreement two or more waters countries Third Party Involvemen t 568 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-151 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between the government of the Republic of India and the 12/12/1996 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 Commission 1 government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh on sharing of Agreement or other Quantity quantities the Ganga/Ganges waters at Farakka specified and area(s) percentage Diplomatic Channels 569 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Ob Russia Protocol on joint use and protection of transboundary water 6/19/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 bodies and coordination of water management in the Ishim River Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Basin. Agreement text is not available. Coded coded Coded ot Coded 571 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada St. Lawrence United States of America Protocol amending the 1978 agreement between the United 1/18/1997 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 States of America and Canada on Great Lakes Water Quality as to a Primary or other available/not Available/Not Available/N amended on October 16, 1983 --revised on Jan 18, 1997 Agreement specified coded Coded ot Coded area(s) 573 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Luxembourg Unknown Agreement between the Government of the Federal Republic of 2/4/1997 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Germany and the Government of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N concerning flood warning systems in the Moselle catchment area Coded coded Coded ot Coded 574 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Tijuana United States of America Distribution of construction, operation and maintenance costs for 4/16/1997 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Pollution Consultation 0 None 0 None 0 the international wastewater treatment plant constructed under primary or other the agreements in Commission Minute NO. 283 for the solution of agreement specified the border sanitation problem at San Diego, California/Tijuana area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-152 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 575 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Brazil La Plata Uruguay Complementary settlement to the agreement of cooperation 5/6/1997 Amendment Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Consultation 1 Dry Season 1 None 0 between the government of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay and to a Primary or other Quantity Control the government of the Federal Republic of Brazil for the use of Agreement specified natural resources and the development of the Cuareim river basin area(s) Fixed quantities vary according to time of the year Fixed quantities, recoupable (in later periods if not met) Fixed quantities, variable ( by water availability) Prior Approval Prioritization of uses Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-153 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 576 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Finland General Germany Hungary Ivory Coast Jordan Luxembourg Namibia Netherlands Norway Paraguay Portugal South Africa Syria Tunisia Venezuela Yemen Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of 5/21/1997 Primary Global 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 International Watercourses Agreement Available/Not Coded Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-154 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 577 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Estonia Narva Russia Agreement between the government of Estonia and the 8/20/1997 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 government of the Russian Federation on the protection and Agreement basin(s) Channels rational use of transboundary waters Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-155 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 578 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Albania Unknown Austria Belgium Byelarus Canada Czech Republic Denmark European Economic Community Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovakia Spain Sweden Ukraine United Kingdom United States of America Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-156 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention on environmental impact assessment in a 9/10/1997 Primary Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 transboundary context, Espoo Agreement Available/Not Coded Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ 579 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Switzerland Rhone Règlement sur la manoeuvre de l'ouvrage de régularisation du 9/17/1997 Semi- Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 niveau du lac Léman à Genève international Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N treaty Coded coded Coded ot Coded 580 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Unknown Russia Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation 11/10/1997 Available but Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 and the Government of People's Republic of China concerning not Available/Not Available/Not principles of joint economic use of several islands and adjacent translated to Coded Coded water areas of transboundary rivers English 581 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Hungary Danube Ukraine Agreement on transboundary waters between Hungary and 11/11/1997 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Ukraine not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 583 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Byelarus Daugava Latvia Russia Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-157 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Draft agreement on water quality management of Zapadnaya 11/12/1997 Not a treaty Entire named 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Dvina/Daugava River basin basin(s) Available/Not Coded Diplomatic Channels 584 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Tijuana United States of America Recommendations for construction of works parallel to the City of 12/2/1997 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Pollution Fixed 0 None 0 None 0 Tijuana, B.C. Wastewater Pumping and Disposal System and primary or other quantities rehabilitation of the San Antonio de los Buenos Treatment Plant agreement specified area(s) 585 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bulgaria Rezvaya Turkey Agreement between the Republic of Turkey and the Republic of 12/4/1997 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 Bulgaria on determination of the boundary in the mouth area of Agreement or other the Mutludere/Rezovska River and delimitation of the maritime specified areas between the two States in the Black Sea. area(s) Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 586 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kyrgyzstan Unknown Uzbekistan Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-158 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and 12/25/1997 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan (signed in Bishkek) Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 587 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Unknown Kyrgyzstan Agreement between the Government of the Republic of 12/26/1997 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic (signed in Biskek) Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 588 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ecuador Zarumilla Peru Agreement on the criteria for the rehabilitation or reconstruction 6/20/1905 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of the headworks and ancillary works of the Zarumilla Canal. Agreement or other available/not Available/Not Available/N specified coded Coded ot Coded area(s) 589 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) European Union Rhine France Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland Convention on the protection of the Rhine 1/22/1998 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 of a Primary basin(s) Agreement Diplomatic Channels 590 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Tajikistan Unknown Uzbekistan Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-159 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan 2/4/1998 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan on cooperation Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N in the area of rational water and energy uses Coded coded Coded ot Coded 591 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan Agreement between the government of the Republic of 3/17/1998 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 Kazakhstan, the government of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Agreement or other government of the Republic of Uzbekistan on the use of water and specified energy resources of the Sry Darya Basin area(s) Diplomatic Channels 592 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan Agreement between the governments of the Republic of 3/17/1998 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, and the Republic of Uzbekistan primary or other Quantity quantities on joint and complex use water and energy resources of the Naryn agreement specified Syr Darya cascade reservoirs area(s) 593 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan Agreement between the government of the Republic of 3/17/1998 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 Kazakhstan, the government of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Agreement two or more Channels government of the Republic of Uzbekistan on cooperation in the countries area of environment and rational nature use Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-160 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 594 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Kazakhstan Unknown Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Uzbekistan Tashkent Declaration 3/26/1998 Not a treaty Not 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 Available/Not Quantity present but Available/Not Coded type not Coded determined by previous analyses 595 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) El Salvador Lempa Guatemala Honduras Treaty between the Republics of El Salvador, Guatemala and 5/25/1998 Does not fit Entire named 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Honduras for the execution of the Trifinio Plan TFDD basin(s) Available/Not inclusion Coded criteria 596 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Syria Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Turkey Minutes between Syria and Turkey on cooperation in fighting 10/20/1998 Not a treaty Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 terrorism, signed at Adana, including Annex 2 Available/Not Available/Not Coded Coded 597 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Ecuador Zarumilla Peru Reglamento para la Administracion del Canal de Zarumilla y la 10/26/1998 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Dry Season 1 Commission 1 utilizacion de sus aguas primary or other Quantity quantities, Control agreement specified variable ( by area(s) water availability) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-161 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Reglamento para la Administracion del Canal de Zarumilla y la 10/26/1998 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 Dry Season 1 Diplomatic 1 utilizacion de sus aguas primary or other Quantity quantities, Control Channels agreement specified variable ( by area(s) water availability) Percentage Commission of flow Diplomatic Channels Prioritization Commission of uses Diplomatic Channels 598 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Portugal Douro/Duero Spain Guadiana Lima Mino Convention about the cooperation for the protection and 11/30/1998 Primary Entire named 1 0 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 sustainable use of the waters of Portuguese-Spanish hydrological Agreement basin(s) and dry basins and additional protocol season control Commission Diplomatic Channels Water Fixed 1 Arbitration Quantity quantities, variable ( by water availability) Commission Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-162 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Convention about the cooperation for the protection and 11/30/1998 Primary Entire named 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 Diplomatic 1 sustainable use of the waters of Portuguese-Spanish hydrological Agreement basin(s) Quantity quantities, and dry Channels basins and additional protocol variable ( by season control water availability) Prior Arbitration Approval Commission Diplomatic Channels 599 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lesotho Orange South Africa Protocol VI to the treaty on the Lesotho Highlands Water Project: 1/1/1999 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 supplementary arrangements regarding the system of governance of a Primary or other for the project Agreement specified area(s) Commission Diplomatic Channels 600 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Niger Niger Agreement between the Republic of Niger and the Republic of 1/14/1999 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Benin relative to the realization of the hydroelectric management Agreement or other of the Dyondyonga site on the Mékrou river, signed at Contonou specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-163 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 601 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Agreement on the status of the International Aral Sea Fund and its 4/9/1999 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 organizations Agreement basin(s) Channels 602 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland Convention on the Protection of the Rhine 4/12/1999 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Arbitration 1 of a Primary basin(s) Agreement Diplomatic Channels 603 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Tajikistan Unknown Uzbekistan Agreement between the Government of the Republic of 4/13/1999 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Uzbekistan and the Government of the Republic of Tajikistan on Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N cooperation in the area of rational water and energy uses in 1999 Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-164 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 604 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Uzbekistan Protocol on inserting amendments and addenda in the agreement 5/7/1999 Replacement Sub-basin(s) 1 Hydropowe Fixed 1 None 0 Not 0 between the governments of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the of a Primary or other r quantities Available/N Kyrgyz Republic, and the Republic of Uzbekistan on the use of Agreement specified which vary ot Coded water and energy resources of the Syr Darya Basin area(s) according to water availability 605 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown UN/ECE protocol on water and health to the 1992 convention on 6/17/1999 Protocol to a Global 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 the protection and use of transboundary watercourses and primary Available/Not international lakes agreement Coded 607 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kenya Nile Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community signed 11/30/1999 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Dry Season 1 Arbitration 1 at Arusha Agreement two or more Control countries 608 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Shu/Chu Kyrgyzstan Talas Agreement between the Government of the Republic of 1/21/2000 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 Diplomatic 1 Kazakhstan and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic on Agreement or other Channels utilization of the water facilities of interstate use on the Chu and specified Talas Rivers. area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-165 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 609 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Angola Unknown Botswana Congo, Democratic Republic of ( Lesotho Malawi Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Seychelles South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, United Republic of Zambia Zimbabwe Revised protocol on shared water courses in the Southern African 8/7/2000 Replacement Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 Development Community of a Primary Available/Not Agreement Coded 610 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Chad Groundwater Egypt Libya Sudan Agreement 1 - Text between Chad, Egypt, Libya and Sudan 10/5/2000 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 concerning the monitoring and exchange of groundwater Agreement basin(s) information of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System. 5 October, 2000 Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-166 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 611 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Chad Groundwater Egypt Libya Sudan Agreement 2 - Text between Chad, Egypt, Libya and Sudan for 10/5/2000 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Monitoring and Data Sharing for sustainable development and Agreement basin(s) proper management of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System. 5 October, 2000 612 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Botswana Orange Lesotho Namibia South Africa Agreement Between the Governments of the Republic of 11/3/2000 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 Botswana the Kingdom of Lesotho the Republic of Namibia and Agreement basin(s) and dry the Republic of South Africa on the Establishment of the Orange- season control Senqu Commission. Windhoek, 3 November, 2000 Commission 613 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Paraguay Acuerdo por notas reversales sobre la creación de una franja de 11/7/2000 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 seguridad de mil metros aguas abajo y aguas arriba del eje de la Agreement or other presa en toda su extensión, de la Central Hidroeléctrica de specified Yacyretá. area(s) 614 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Aral Sea Kazakhstan Ili/Kunes He Ob Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-167 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement between the Government of Kazakhstan and the 9/12/2001 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of People’s Republic of China on management and not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N protection of transboundary rivers translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 615 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iraq Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Syria Bilateral Agreement between Syria and Iraq concerning the 4/9/2002 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 installation of a Syrian pump station on the Tigris River for not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N irrigation purposes translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 616 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lebanon An Nahr Al Kabir Syria An agreement between the Syrian Arab Republic and the Lebanese 4/20/2002 Primary Entire named 1 Water Percentage 1 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 Republic for the sharing of the Great Southern River Basin water Agreement basin(s) Quantity of flow Available/Not Channels and building of joint dam on the maincourse of the river Coded 618 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mali Senegal Mauritania Senegal Senegal River Water Charter 5/28/2002 Primary Entire named 1 Water Prioritization 1 None 0 Arbitration 1 Agreement basin(s) Quantity of uses Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-168 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 619 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Byelarus Daugava Russia Dnieper Narva Neman Volga The Agreement between the Government of Russian Federation 5/24/2002 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 and the Government of the Republic of Belarus on collaboration Agreement two or more Available/Not on the field of protection and rational use of transboundary water countries Coded 620 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mozambique Incomati South Africa Maputo Swaziland Tripartite Interim Agreement between the Republic of 8/29/2002 Primary Entire named 1 Water Fixed 1 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 Mozambique and the Republic of South Africa and the Kingdom of Agreement basin(s) Quantity quantities and dry Swaziland for co-operation on the protection and sustainable season control utilisation of the water resources of the Incomati and Maputo watercourses Diplomatic Channels Prioritization Arbitration of uses Diplomatic Channels 621 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Rhine France Germany Luxembourg Netherlands Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-169 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism International treaty for the Meuse 12/2/2002 Replacement Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Diplomatic 1 of a Primary basin(s) and dry Channels Agreement season control 622 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bosnia and Herzegovina Danube Croatia Slovenia Yugoslavia (Former) Framework Agreement on the Sava River Basin 12/3/2002 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 Agreement basin(s) and dry season control Diplomatic Channels Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 623 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lebanon An Nahr Al Kabir Syria Agreement between Syria and Lebanon for the sharing of the 12/12/2002 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 Great Southern River basin waters and the building of a joint dam Agreement or other Quantity of flow on it specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-170 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 624 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Angola Zambezi Botswana Malawi Mozambique Namibia Tanzania, United Republic of Zambia Zimbabwe Agreement on the Establishment of the Zambezi Watercourse 7/13/2004 Primary Entire named 1 Water Unclear 1 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 Commission Agreement basin(s) Quantity and dry season control Commission Diplomatic Channels 625 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Czech Republic Danube Hungary Montenegro Poland Romania Serbia Slovakia Ukraine Framework convention of the protection and sustainable 5/22/2003 Primary Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Commission 1 development of the Carpathians Agreement Available/Not Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-171 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 626 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Burundi Congo/Zaire Congo, Democratic Republic of ( Tanzania, United Republic of Zambia The Convention on the Sustainable Management of Lake 6/12/2003 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Tanganyika Agreement basin(s) Diplomatic Channels Third Party Involvemen t Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-172 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 627 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Algeria General Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo, Democratic Republic of ( Congo, Republic of the (Brazzavi Djibouti Egypt Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia, The Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Ivory Coast Kenya Lesotho Liberia Libya Madagascar Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-173 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Morocco Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa Sudan Swaziland Tanzania, United Republic of Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe African convention on the conservation of nature and natural 7/11/2003 Primary Regional 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 Diplomatic 1 resources Agreement Available/Not Channels Coded Third Party Involvemen t Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-174 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 628 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Hungary Unknown Romania Agreement between the Government of Romania and the 9/15/2003 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of Hungary on the collaboration for the Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N transboundary waters protection and sustainable use Coded coded Coded ot Coded 629 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kenya Nile Tanzania, United Republic of Uganda Protocol for Sustainable Development of Lake Victoria Basin. 11/29/2003 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 Both flood 1 Arbitration 1 Arusha, 29 November, 2003 Agreement basin(s) and dry season control Commission 630 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mali Niger Niger Protocole d'accord entre la République du Niger et la République 6/6/2004 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 du Mali relatif à la réalisation des barrages de Taoussa au Mali et Agreement or other Channels de Kandadji au Niger specified area(s) 631 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Albania Drin Macedonia Agreement between the council of ministers of the Republic of 6/17/2004 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 Albania and the Government of the Repulic of Macedonia for the Agreement basin(s) protection and sustainable development of Lake Ohrid and its watershed Diplomatic Channels Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-175 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 633 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Albania Lake Prespa Greece Vijose Agreement between the Government of the Hellenic Republic and 4/3/2003 Replacement All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 the Government of the Republic of Albania on the establishment of a Primary two or more Channels of the permanent Greek-Albanian commission on transboundary Agreement countries freshwater issues 636 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Benin Volta Burkina Faso Ghana Ivory Coast Mali Togo Convention on the status of the Volta River and the Establishment 1/19/2007 Primary Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Commission 1 of Volta Basin Authority Agreement basin(s) Permanent Judicial Organ Third Party Involvemen t 638 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bolivia Amazon Brazil Agreement on Economic and technical co-operation between the Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of the Republic of Brazil and the Government of the not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Republic of Bolivia translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-176 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 639 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Agreement by Minute No. 218 of the International Boundary and 3/22/1965 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Fixed 1 None 0 None 0 Water Commission USA and Mexico primary or other Quantity quantities, agreement specified variable ( by area(s) water availability) 640 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil Unknown Uruguay Basic accord of scientific and technical cooperation between the 6/12/1975 Replacement Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay and the of a Primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Government of the Federal Republic of Brazil in the area of water Agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded resources. 641 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ecuador Zarumilla Peru Reglamento para la administracion del canal de zarumilla y la Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 utilization de sus aguas primary or other available/not Available/Not Available/N agreement specified coded Coded ot Coded area(s) 642 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Germany Switzerland Agreement between Germany, France and Switzerland Concerning 5/10/1922 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 the Scheme for the Kembs Lateral Canal, with Proces-Verbal Agreement or other specified area(s) Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-177 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 643 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Guinea Senegal Mali Mauritania Senegal Statute of the Organization of Senegal River States 3/24/1968 Primary All waters of 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Agreement two or more countries 644 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Iraq Agreement between Iran and Iraq Concerning Frontier 12/26/1975 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Arbitration 1 Commissioners Agreement or other specified area(s) Diplomatic Channels Third Party Involvemen t 645 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ecuador Zarumilla Peru Agreement on the criteria for the rehabilitation or reconstruction 3/5/1998 Primary Not 0 Water Percentage 1 Not 0 None 0 of the headworks and ancillary works of the Zarumilla Canal Agreement Available/Not Quantity of flow Available/Not Coded Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-178 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 646 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Costa Rica General Dominican Republic El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama Comite' Coordinador Regional de Inistituciones de Agua Potable y 5/1/1979 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Saneamiento de Centroamerica, Panama' y Republica Dominicana Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N (CAPRE) Coded coded Coded ot Coded 647 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Agreement on Enviornomental Management of the Lielupe River 5/25/1993 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Basin Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 648 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Congo, Democratic Republic of ( Unknown United Kingdom Agreement between Great Britain and the Independent State of 5/12/1894 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 the Congo relating to the spheres of influence of Great Britain and Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N the Independent State of the Congo in East and Central Africa Coded coded Coded ot Coded 649 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Rio Grande (North America) Convention between the United States of America and the United 11/12/1884 Does not fit Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 States of Mexico touching the international boundary line where it TFDD Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N follows the bed of the Rio Colorado inclusion Coded coded Coded ot Coded criteria Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-179 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 650 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Ecuador Unknown Peru Protocol of Peace, Friendship and Boundaries Signed between 1/29/1942 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Peru and Ecuador in Rio de Janeiro on January 29, 1942 Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1000 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Ecuador Unknown Peru Final protocol of the Boundary Commission (between Germany 10/18/1924 Primary Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and Poland) Agreement Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1001 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Afghanistan Aral Sea Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Protocol between the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and 6/25/1958 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Afghanistan on the joint execution of works for the integrated Agreement or other utilization of the water resources in the frontier section of the specified Amudarya river area(s) 1002 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) France Unknown Luxembourg Modification to the Convention (27/10/1956) between the French 11/28/1974 Amendment Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Grand Duche to a Primary Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N of Luxembourg concerning the Canalization of the Moselle Agreement Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1003 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Brazil La Plata Paraguay Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-180 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Acuerdo entre el Gobierno de la República del Paraguay y el 9/1/1994 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 Gobierno de la República Federativa del Brasil para la Agreement or other conservación de la fauna acuática en los cursos de los ríos specified limítrofes area(s) 1004 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhone Switzerland Accord sous forme d'échange de notes entre le Gouvernement de 9/19/1995 Protocol to a Entire named 1 Universal None 0 None 0 None 0 la République française et le Conseil fédéral suisse portant primary basin(s) modification de l'accord du 20 novembre 1980 sur la agreement déphosphatation des eaux du lac Léman 1005 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Romania Danube Ukraine Agreement between the government of Romania and the 9/30/1997 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 government of Ukraine on cooperation in the field of Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N transboundary water management Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1006 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Exchange of notes (October 4, 1965) between the government of 10/4/1965 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 Flood Control 1 None 0 Canada and the government of the United States of America primary or other relating to the establishment of directions to be followed by the agreement specified permanent engineering board established under article XV of the area(s) Colum 1007 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Indus United Kingdom Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-181 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Articles of agreement between the Edur Durbar and the British 7/20/1874 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 government international or other Quantity present but Available/Not treaty specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 1008 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Austria Unknown Germany Hungary Liechtenstein Swaziland Convention between Austria, Hungary, Bade, Bavaria, 7/5/1893 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Liechtenstein, Switzerland and Wurtemburg setting uniform Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N provisions on fisheries in Lake Constance with Protocol Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1009 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna United Kingdom Agreement between the British government and the Patiala state 8/29/1893 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 regarding the Sirsa branch of the Western Jumna Canal international or other Quantity present but Available/Not treaty specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 1010 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) India Indus United Kingdom Final working agreement relative to the Sirhind Canal between 8/12/1903 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Great Britain and Patiala, Jind and Nabha international or other Quantity present but Available/Not treaty specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-182 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1011 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Germany Rhine Luxembourg State treaty between the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the 4/25/1950 Semi- Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Arbitration 1 Land Rhineland-Palatinate in the Federal Republic of Germany international or other Quantity present but Available/Not concerning the construction of a hydro-electric power-plant on the treaty specified type not Coded Sauer (Sûre) at Rosport/Ralingen, signed at Trier area(s) determined by previous analyses 1012 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Paraguay Convenio para el estudio del aprovechamiento de los recursos del 6/18/1971 Protocol to a Sub-basin(s) 1 Universal None 0 None 0 Diplomatic 1 Río Paraná primary or other Channels agreement specified area(s) 1013 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America Joint Communique (USA and Mexico) 6/17/1972 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1014 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Niger Unknown Nigeria Protocol to the Agreement to Establish a Commission for the 12/22/1973 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Koma-Dogou-Yobe. 22 December, 1973 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1015 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna India Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-183 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Meeting of the Joint Rivers Commission 7/20/1983 Not a treaty Sub-basin(s) 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 or other Quantity present but Available/Not specified type not Coded area(s) determined by previous analyses 1016 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Lithuania Neman Poland Agreement between the environmental protection ministry of the 3/31/1994 Not a treaty Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Republic of Lithuania and the ministry of environmental Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N protection, nature conservation and forestry of the Republic Coded coded Coded ot Coded Poland 1017 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Turkmenistan Aral Sea Uzbekistan Agreement between Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan on water 1/16/1996 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 management not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1018 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Aral Sea Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan Agreement between the Government of Kazakhstan, the 4/5/1996 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of Kyrgyzstan and the Government of Uzbekistan on not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N management of water resources in Central Asia translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1019 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Botswana Limpopo South Africa Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-184 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Agreement on the Establishment of the Joint Permanent Technical 6/19/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Commission. 1997 Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1057 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Unknown Agreement on Transboundary Coopearation 2/22/1999 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1058 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Unknown Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Uzbekistan Agreement between Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and 6/17/1999 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Uzbekistan in the sphere of hydrometeorology not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1059 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Byelarus Unknown Russia Agreement on cooperation between the Ministry of Natural 3/14/2000 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Resources and Environmental Protection of Belarus and the not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1060 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Tajikistan Unknown Uzbekistan Agreement between the Government of Uzbekistan and the 5/30/2000 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of Tajikistan on joint arrangements and interaction not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N regarding early warning in case of water inrush from Sarez Lake translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-185 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1061 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Syria Asi/Orontes Turkey Nahr El Kebir Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Joint comminique between Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry 8/23/2001 Not a treaty Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 Southeastern Anatolia Project Regional Development Available/Not Available/Not Administration (GAP) and Arab Republic of Syria Ministry of Coded Coded Irrigation General Organization for Land Development (GOLD) 1062 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mozambique Unknown Zimbabwe Title of agreement is not known. Agreement text is also not 6/24/1905 Missing Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 available.The agreement sets up a Joint Water Commission, which Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N will initiate water projects on shared watercourses (specifically, Coded coded Coded ot Coded managing, sharing, and developing of water resources). No specif 1063 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Azerbaijan Unknown Iran Kazakhstan Russia Turkmenistan Framework Convention for the Protection of the Marine 11/4/2003 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Environment of the Caspian Sea. not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1065 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Egypt Groundwater Libya Bilateral Cooperation Agreement Minutes between Egypt and 7/8/1991 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Libya on the establishment of the Joint Authority for the Study and not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Development of Groundwater of the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded System English Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-186 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1066 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Armenia Unknown Azerbaijan Byelarus Georgia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Moldova Russia Tajikistan Turkmenistan Ukraine Uzbekistan CIS Agreement on rational management and protection of 9/11/1998 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 transboundary waterbodies. not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1067 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Byelarus Dnieper Ukraine Vistula/Wista Agreement between the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine and the 10/16/2001 Available but Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Government of Belarus on joint management and protection of not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N transboundary waterbodies translated to Coded coded Coded ot Coded English 1068 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Malaysia Golok Thailand An inter-governmental agreement between Malaysia and Thailand 3/7/1997 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 was signed between the Ministers of Agriculture of both countries Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N on 7th March 1997. Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-187 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1069 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) China Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Myanmar (Burma) Thailand Commercial navigation on the Lancand-Mekong River 6/26/2001 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1070 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Myanmar (Burma) Thailand Vietnam Agreement on Providing the Hydrologic Data during Flood Season 4/1/2002 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1071 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Kazakhstan Shu/Chu Kyrgyzstan Talas Agreement on Utilization of the Water Facilities Use on the Chu 2/1/2002 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and Talas Rivers Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1072 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) China Tumen Korea, Democratic People's Rep Russia The three parties signed the "Agreement on establishing the 12/1/1995 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Development and Coordination Commission of Tumen River Area" Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N in New York, December 1995 Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-188 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1073 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) China Tumen Korea, Democratic People's Rep Mongolia Russia South Korea The parties signed the "Agreement on establishing the 6/18/1905 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 development and negotiation commission of the Tumen River Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Economic Development Zone and Notrheast Asia" Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1074 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Unknown Danube Draft convention on cooperation for the protection and 6/30/1994 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 sustainable use of the Danube River Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1075 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Poland Danube Ukraine Dniester Vistula/Wista Agreement between the government of Ukraine and the republic 10/10/1996 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 of Poland on cooperation in the field of water management in Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N frontier waters Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1076 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Estonia Narva Russia Treaty between Estonia and Russia on the conservation of fish 6/16/1905 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 stocks in Lake Peipsi Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-189 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1077 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Belgium Rhine France Germany Netherlands Switzerland United Kingdom Revised convention relating to the navigation of the Rhine 10/17/1868 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1078 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) France Rhine Switzerland Convention pour le reglement des rapports entre la Suisse et la 8/28/1930 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 France au sujet de certaines clauses du regime juridique de la Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N future derivation de Kembs Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-190 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1079 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Austria General Belgium Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom EU Water Framework Directive 12/22/2000 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-191 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1080 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Mexico Colorado United States of America International Boundary and Water Commission – minute No. 288 – 10/30/1992 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 between USA and Mexico regarding long-term plan to address Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N wastewater and water quality problems at international boundary Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1081 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Mexico Unknown United States of America Pacific Salmon Treaty signed between Canada, the United States 1/28/1985 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and representing Tribes from both nations. Addresses the harvest Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N and management of salmon Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1082 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Columbia United States of America Fraser Environmental Cooperation Agreement between British Columbia 5/7/1992 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 and the State of Washington to protect and manage groundwater Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N resources Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1083 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Canada Unknown United States of America An Act to Amend the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act: 12/19/2002 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 Regulations prohibiting the bulk removal of boundary waters from Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Canadian basins for any purpose. and licensing for projects Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded affecting the level or flow of waters to the United States side of t 1084 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Iran Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Turkey Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-192 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism Treaty between Turkey and Iran on the Sarisu and Karasu River 11/18/1955 Not Not 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 Available/Not Available/Not Quantity present but Available/Not Coded Coded type not Coded determined by previous analyses 1085 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Finland Vuoksa Union of Soviet Socialist Republi Agreement concerning the regulations governing Lake Saimaa and 10/26/1989 Not Not 0 Water Fixed 1 Not 0 Not 0 the Vuoksi River (with annexes). Signed at Helsinki Available/Not Available/Not Quantity quantities, Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded variable ( by Coded ot Coded water availability) 1086 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Syria Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab Turkey Protocol on matters pertaining to economic cooperation. Signed at 7/17/1987 Not Not 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 None 0 Damascus Available/Not Available/Not Quantity present but Available/Not Coded Coded type not Coded determined by previous analyses 1089 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cambodia (Kampuchea) Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Thailand Vietnam Decision No. 144/1999/QD-TTg, Ratifying the plan on the control 6/21/1999 Not Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 and use of flood water in Mekong River Delta Area for the period Available/Not Available/Not Available/Not from now to the year 2010 Coded Coded Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-193 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1090 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Cambodia (Kampuchea) Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Thailand Vietnam Directive No. 17/2000/Ct-TTg of September 20,2000 on coping 9/20/2000 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 Not 0 with flooding in the Mekong River Delta Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Available/N Coded Coded coded Coded ot Coded 1091 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Cambodia (Kampuchea) Mekong Laos, People's Democratic Repu Thailand Vietnam Decision No. 78/2004/QD-TTg of May 7, 2004 adjusting and 5/7/2004 Not Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 supplementing a number of mechanisms and policies in order to Available/Not Available/Not Available/Not speed up the construction progress of population clusters and Coded Coded Coded lines as well as dwelling houses in frequently flooded provinces in Mekong 1092 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Lebanon Asi/Orontes Syria Agreement Annex between Lebanon and Syria concerning the 12/12/2002 Primary Sub-basin(s) 1 Water Percentage 1 None 0 None 0 distribution of water of the Al-Asi River rising in Lebanon. Agreement or other Quantity of flow specified area(s) 1093 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Libya Unknown Ukraine Agreement between Ukraine and Libya on cooperation in the 10/14/2003 Not Not 0 Universal None 0 Not 0 None 0 sphere of geological exploration Available/Not Available/Not Available/Not Coded Coded Coded Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-194 Doc Document Geographic Treaty Allo- Allocation Allo- Variability Varia- Conflict Con- ID Type Scope Presence cation Mech- cation Mgmt bility Reso- flict Document Name Date Score Category anism Score Mechanism Score lution Res. Signed Mech- Score anism 1094 Signatories TestReduceBasin subreport Basin(s) Argentina La Plata Bolivia Brazil Paraguay Uruguay Treaty of the River Plate Basin 8/14/1970 Not Not 0 Universal Not 0 Not 0 None 0 Available/Not Available/Not available/not Available/Not Coded Coded coded Coded 1095 TestReduceBasin subreport Signatories Basin(s) Jordan Jordan Syria Agreement concerning the utilization of the Yarmuk waters (with 9/3/1987 Not Not 0 Water Allocation 1 Not 0 Commission 1 Annex). Signed at Amman on 3 September 1987 Available/Not Available/Not Quantity present but Available/Not Coded Coded type not Coded determined by previous analyses 896 Appendix 2 - Treaty Data and Scoring A2-195 Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU This appendix lists every CBU, its location both in terms of the basin continent and the World Bank region, and whether or not there is an RBO with jurisdiction for each CBU. Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Amur RBO Present Korea, Democratic People's Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of (North) Amur No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Amur RBO Present East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Aral Sea No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Bangau No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Bei Jiang/Hsi No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Bei Jiang/Hsi No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Beilun No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Beilun No RBO Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Ca/Song-Koi No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Ca/Song-Koi No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Fly No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Fly No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Golok No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Golok No RBO Korea, Democratic People's Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of (North) Han No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Har Us Nur No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Har Us Nur No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Ili/Kunes He No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Indus No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Irrawaddy No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Irrawaddy No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Jenisej/Yenisey No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Kaladan No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Lake Ubsa-Nur No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Loes No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Timor Leste Loes No RBO Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Ma No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Ma No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Cambodia (Kampuchea) Mekong RBO Present East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Mekong RBO Present Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Mekong RBO Present East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Mekong RBO Present East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Mekong RBO Present East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Mekong RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-1 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Ob No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Ob No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Pakchan No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Pakchan No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Pandaruan No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Pu Lun T'o No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Pu Lun T'o No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Red/Song Hong No RBO Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Red/Song Hong No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Red/Song Hong No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Cambodia (Kampuchea) Saigon No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Saigon No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Salween No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Salween No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Salween No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Sembakung No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Sembakung No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Sepik No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Sepik No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Cambodia (Kampuchea) Song Vam Co Dong No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Song Vam Co Dong No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Sujfun No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Tami No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Tami No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Tarim No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Tjeroaka-Wanggoe No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Tjeroaka-Wanggoe No RBO East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Tumen RBO Present Korea, Democratic People's Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of (North) Tumen RBO Present East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Yalu No RBO Korea, Democratic People's Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of (North) Yalu No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Amur RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Aral Sea RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Aral Sea RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Tajikistan Aral Sea RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Aral Sea RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Uzbekistan Aral Sea RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Asi/Orontes No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Astara Chay No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Atrak No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Barta No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Barta No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Coruh No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-2 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Coruh No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Danube No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bosnia and Herzegovina Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Croatia Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Hungary Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Montenegro Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Danube No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Romania Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Slovakia Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Danube RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Daugava No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Daugava No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Daugava No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Daugava No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Dnieper RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Dnieper RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Dnieper RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Dniester No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Dniester No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Dniester No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Don No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Don No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Drin No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Drin No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Montenegro Drin No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Drin No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Elancik No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Elancik No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Elbe No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Gauja No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Har Us Nur No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Hari/Harirud No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Ili/Kunes He No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Ili/Kunes He No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Jacobs No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Jenisej/Yenisey No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Kemi No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Kogilnik No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Kogilnik No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bosnia and Herzegovina Krka No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Croatia Krka No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Armenia Kura-Araks No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-3 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Kura-Araks No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Kura-Araks No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Kura-Araks No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Lake Prespa No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Lake Prespa No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Lake Ubsa-Nur No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Lava/Pregel No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Lava/Pregel No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Lielupe No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Lielupe No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Maritsa No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Turkey Maritsa No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Mius No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Mius No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Murgab No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Nahr El Kebir No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Narva No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Narva No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Narva RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Neman No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Neman No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Neman No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Neman No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Neman No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bosnia and Herzegovina Neretva No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Croatia Neretva No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Nestos No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Ob RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Ob RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Oder/Odra RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Slovakia Oder/Odra No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Olanga RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Oral/Ural No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Oral/Ural No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Oulu No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Parnu No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Pasvik No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Prohladnaja No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Prohladnaja No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Pu Lun T'o No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Rezvaya No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Turkey Rezvaya No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Salaca No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Samur No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Samur No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-4 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Sarata No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Sarata No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Shu/Chu No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Shu/Chu No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Struma No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Struma No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Struma No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Sujfun No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Sulak No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Sulak No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Sulak No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Talas No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Talas No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Tarim No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Tajikistan Tarim No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Terek No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Terek No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Tuloma No RBO Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Tumen RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Vardar No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Vardar No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Velaka No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Turkey Velaka No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Venta No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Venta No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Vijose No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Vistula/Wista No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Vistula/Wista RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Slovakia Vistula/Wista No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Vistula/Wista RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Volga No RBO Europe and Central Asia Europe Kazakhstan Volga RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Volga RBO Present Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Vuoksa No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Amacuro No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Amacuro No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia Amazon RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Amazon RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Amazon RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Amazon RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Amazon RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Amazon RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Amazon RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Amazon RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-5 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Latin America and Caribbean North America Dominican Republic Artibonite No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Haiti Artibonite No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Aviles No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Aviles No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Aysen No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Aysen No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Baker No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Baker No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Barima No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Barima No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Belize No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Belize No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia Cancoso/Lauca No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Cancoso/Lauca No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Candelaria RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Candelaria RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Carmen Silva/Chico No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Carmen Silva/Chico No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Catatumbo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Catatumbo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Chamelecon No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Chamelecon No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Changuinola No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Changuinola No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Chira No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Chira No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Chiriqui No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Chiriqui No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Choluteca No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Choluteca No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Chuy No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Uruguay Chuy No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Coatan Achute RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Coatan Achute RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Coco/Segovia No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Coco/Segovia No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Colorado RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Comau No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Comau No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Conventillos No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Conventillos No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Corantijn/Courantyne No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Corantijn/Courantyne No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Corantijn/Courantyne No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Corredores/Colorado No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-6 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Corredores/Colorado No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Cullen RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Cullen RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica El Naranjo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua El Naranjo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Essequibo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Essequibo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Essequibo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Essequibo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Gallegos/Chico No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Gallegos/Chico No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America El Salvador Goascoran No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Goascoran No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Grijalva No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Grijalva RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Grijalva RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Hondo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Hondo RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Hondo RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Jurado No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Panama Jurado No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina La Plata RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia La Plata RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil La Plata RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Paraguay La Plata RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Uruguay La Plata RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Lagoon Mirim RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Uruguay Lagoon Mirim RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Lake Fagnano No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Lake Fagnano No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia Lake Titicaca-Poopo System RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Lake Titicaca-Poopo System RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Lake Titicaca-Poopo System RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America El Salvador Lempa RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Lempa RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Lempa RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Maroni No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Maroni No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Dominican Republic Massacre No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Haiti Massacre No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Mataje No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Mataje No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Mira No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Mira No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Moho No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-7 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Moho No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Motaqua No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Motaqua No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Negro No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Negro No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Oiapoque/Oyupock No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Orinoco No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Orinoco No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Orinoco No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Palena No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Palena No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Pascua No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Pascua No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Patia No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Patia No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America El Salvador Paz RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Paz RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Dominican Republic Pedernales No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Haiti Pedernales No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Puelo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Puelo No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Rio Grande (North America) RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Rio Grande (South America) No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Rio Grande (South America) No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica San Juan No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua San Juan No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina San Martin No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile San Martin No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Sarstun No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Sarstun No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Seno Union/Serrano No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Seno Union/Serrano No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Sixaola RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Sixaola RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Suchiate RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Suchiate RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Temash No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Temash No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Tijuana No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Tumbes No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Tumbes No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Valdivia No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Valdivia No RBO Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Yaqui RBO Present Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Yelcho No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-8 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Yelcho No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Zapaleri No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia Zapaleri No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Zapaleri No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Zarumilla No RBO Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Zarumilla No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon An Nahr Al Kabir No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria An Nahr Al Kabir No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon Asi/Orontes No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Asi/Orontes No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Astara Chay No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Atrak No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Djibouti Awash No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Daoura No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Daoura No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Dasht No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Dra No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Dra No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Guir No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Guir No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Hari/Harirud No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Helmand RBO Present Middle East and North Africa Asia Egypt Jordan No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Jordan Jordan RBO Present Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon Jordan No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Jordan RBO Present Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Kowl E Namaksar No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Kura-Araks No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Lake Chad No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Libya Lake Chad No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Medjerda No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Tunisia Medjerda No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Nahr El Kebir No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Niger No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Egypt Nile RBO Present Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Oued Bon Naima No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Oued Bon Naima No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Tafna No RBO Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Tafna No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Iraq Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab RBO Present Middle East and North Africa Asia Jordan Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab No RBO Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab RBO Present Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon Wadi Al Izziyah No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-9 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Not Available South America French Guiana Amazon No RBO Not Available Africa Western Sahara Atui No RBO Not Available South America French Guiana Maroni No RBO Not Available South America French Guiana Oiapoque/Oyupock No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Alsek RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Alsek RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Bann No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Bann No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Bidasoa No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Bidasoa No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Castletown No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Castletown No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Chilkat RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Chilkat RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Colorado RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Columbia RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Columbia RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Austria Danube RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Danube RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Danube RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Danube No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Danube No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Douro/Duero RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Douro/Duero RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Ebro No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Ebro No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Austria Elbe No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Elbe RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-10 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Elbe RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Erne No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Erne No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Fane No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Fane No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Firth RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Firth RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Flurry No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Flurry No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Foyle No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Foyle No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Fraser RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Fraser RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Garonne RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Garonne RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Glama No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Sweden Glama No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Guadiana RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Guadiana RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Asia South Korea Han No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Isonzo No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Jacobs No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Kemi RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Klaralven No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Sweden Klaralven No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Lake Prespa No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Lima RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-11 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Lima RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Maritsa No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Mino RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Mino RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Mississippi RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Mississippi RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Naatamo No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Naatamo No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Nelson-Saskatchewan RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Nelson-Saskatchewan RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Nestos No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Oder/Odra RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Oder/Odra RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Olanga RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Oulu No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Pasvik No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Pasvik No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Po No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Po RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Po RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Austria Rhine RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Rhine No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Rhine RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Rhine RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Rhine No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Luxembourg Rhine RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Netherlands Rhine RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-12 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Rhine RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Rhone RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Rhone RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Rio Grande (North America) RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Roia No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Roia No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Schelde RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Schelde RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Netherlands Schelde RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Seine No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Seine No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Luxembourg Seine No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Skagit RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Skagit RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada St. Croix RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America St. Croix RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada St. John (North America) RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America St. John (North America) RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada St. Lawrence RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America St. Lawrence RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Stikine RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Stikine RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Struma No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Tagus/Tejo RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Tagus/Tejo RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Taku RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Taku RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-13 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Tana RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Tana RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Tijuana No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Torne/Tornealven RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Torne/Tornealven RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Sweden Torne/Tornealven RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Tuloma No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Vardar No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Vijose No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Vistula/Wista No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Vuoksa No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Whiting RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Whiting RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Denmark Wiedau No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Wiedau No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Yaqui RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Yser No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Yser No RBO Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Yukon RBO Present Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America United States of America Yukon RBO Present Other High Income Economies Asia Brunei Bangau No RBO Other High Income Economies Europe Slovenia Danube RBO Present Other High Income Economies Europe Andorra Ebro No RBO Other High Income Economies Europe Andorra Garonne No RBO Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Gauja No RBO Other High Income Economies Europe Slovenia Isonzo No RBO Other High Income Economies Asia Israel Jordan RBO Present Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Narva RBO Present Other High Income Economies Asia Brunei Pandaruan No RBO Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Parnu No RBO Other High Income Economies Europe Liechtenstein Rhine No RBO Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Salaca No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-14 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Other High Income Economies Asia Saudi Arabia Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt al Arab No RBO Other High Income Economies Asia Israel Wadi Al Izziyah No RBO South Asia Asia Afghanistan Aral Sea No RBO South Asia Asia Pakistan BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye No RBO South Asia Asia Pakistan Dasht No RBO South Asia Asia Bangladesh Fenney No RBO South Asia Asia India Fenney No RBO South Asia Asia Bangladesh Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna RBO Present South Asia Asia Bhutan Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna No RBO South Asia Asia India Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna RBO Present South Asia Asia Nepal Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna No RBO South Asia Asia Afghanistan Hari/Harirud No RBO South Asia Asia Afghanistan Helmand RBO Present South Asia Asia Pakistan Helmand No RBO South Asia Asia Afghanistan Indus No RBO South Asia Asia India Indus RBO Present South Asia Asia Pakistan Indus RBO Present South Asia Asia India Irrawaddy No RBO South Asia Asia India Kaladan No RBO South Asia Asia Bangladesh Karnaphuli No RBO South Asia Asia India Karnaphuli No RBO South Asia Asia Afghanistan Kowl E Namaksar No RBO South Asia Asia Afghanistan Murgab No RBO South Asia Asia Afghanistan Tarim No RBO South Asia Asia Pakistan Tarim No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Akpa No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Akpa No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mauritania Atui No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Awash No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Somalia Awash No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Eritrea Baraka No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Baraka No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Benito/Ntem No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Benito/Ntem No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Benito/Ntem No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Bia No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Bia No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Buzi No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Buzi No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Cavally No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Cavally No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Cavally No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Cestos No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Cestos No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Cestos No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-15 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Chiloango No RBO Congo, Democratic Republic of Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Kinshasa) Chiloango No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) Chiloango No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burundi Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Congo/Zaire RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Central African Republic Congo/Zaire RBO Present Congo, Democratic Republic of Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Kinshasa) Congo/Zaire RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) Congo/Zaire RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Malawi Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Rwanda Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zambia Congo/Zaire No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Corubal RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea-Bissau Corubal RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Cross No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Cross No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Cuvelai/Etosha No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Cuvelai/Etosha No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gambia, The Gambia RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Gambia RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea-Bissau Gambia RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Senegal Gambia RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Eritrea Gash No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Gash No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Gash No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Geba RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea-Bissau Geba RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Senegal Geba RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Great Scarcies No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Great Scarcies No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Incomati RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Incomati RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Swaziland Incomati RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Juba-Shibeli No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Juba-Shibeli No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Somalia Juba-Shibeli No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burkina Faso Komoe No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Komoe No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-16 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Komoe No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Komoe No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Kunene RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Kunene RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Lake Chad RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Central African Republic Lake Chad RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Chad Lake Chad RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Niger Lake Chad RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Lake Chad RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Lake Chad No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Lake Natron No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Lake Natron No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Lake Turkana No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Lake Turkana No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Lake Turkana No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Lake Turkana No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Limpopo RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Limpopo RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Limpopo RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Limpopo RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Little Scarcies No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Little Scarcies No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Loffa No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Loffa No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Lotagipi Swamp No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Lotagipi Swamp No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Lotagipi Swamp No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Lotagipi Swamp No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Mana-Morro RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Mana-Morro RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Maputo RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Maputo RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Swaziland Maputo RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Mbe No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Mbe No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Moa No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Moa No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Moa No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Mono No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Togo Mono No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burkina Faso Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Chad Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Niger RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-17 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Niger Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Niger RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burundi Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Central African Republic Nile RBO Present Congo, Democratic Republic of Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Kinshasa) Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Eritrea Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Rwanda Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Nile RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) Nyanga No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Nyanga No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Ogooue No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) Ogooue No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Ogooue No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Ogooue No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Okavango RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Okavango RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Okavango RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Okavango No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Orange RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Lesotho Orange RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Orange RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Orange RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Oueme No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Oueme No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Togo Oueme No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Pangani No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Pangani No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Pungwe No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Pungwe No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Malawi Ruvuma No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Ruvuma No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Ruvuma No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Sabi No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Sabi No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Sanaga No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Central African Republic Sanaga No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Sanaga No RBO Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-18 Basin RBO Presence/ World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Sassandra No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Sassandra No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Senegal RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Senegal RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mauritania Senegal RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Senegal Senegal RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea St. John (Africa) No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia St. John (Africa) No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea St. Paul No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia St. Paul No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Tano No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Tano No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Lesotho Thukela No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Thukela No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Umba No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Umba No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Umbeluzi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Umbeluzi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Swaziland Umbeluzi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Utamboni No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Utamboni No RBO Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Volta RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burkina Faso Volta RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Volta RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Volta RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Volta RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Togo Volta RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Zambezi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Zambezi RBO Present Congo, Democratic Republic of Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Kinshasa) Zambezi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Malawi Zambezi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Zambezi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Zambezi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Tanzania, United Republic of Zambezi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zambia Zambezi RBO Present Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Zambezi RBO Present Appendix 3 - RBO presence/absence by CBU A3-19 Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU The data in this appendix are organized by World Bank region and show the aggregate score that each CBU received for each treaty component, the total treaty/RBO score and the vulnerability level that corresponds to that treaty/RBO score. Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Amur 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Korea, Democratic People's Republic of East Asia and the Pacific Asia (North) Amur 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Amur 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Aral Sea 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Bangau 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Bei Jiang/Hsi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Bei Jiang/Hsi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Beilun 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Beilun 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Ca/Song-Koi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Ca/Song-Koi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Fly 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Fly 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Ganges-Brahmaputra- East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Meghna 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Ganges-Brahmaputra- East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Meghna 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Golok 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Golok 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Korea, Democratic People's Republic of East Asia and the Pacific Asia (North) Han 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Har Us Nur 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-1 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Har Us Nur 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Ili/Kunes He 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Indus 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Irrawaddy 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Irrawaddy 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Jenisej/Yenisey 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Kaladan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Lake Ubsa-Nur 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Loes 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Timor Leste Loes 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Ma 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Ma 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Cambodia East Asia and the Pacific Asia (Kampuchea) Mekong 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Mekong 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Mekong 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Mekong 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Mekong 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Mekong 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Ob 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Ob 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Pakchan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Pakchan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Pandaruan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Pu Lun T'o 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia Mongolia Pu Lun T'o 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Red/Song Hong 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-2 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Laos, People's Democratic Republic East Asia and the Pacific Asia of Red/Song Hong 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Red/Song Hong 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Cambodia East Asia and the Pacific Asia (Kampuchea) Saigon 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Saigon 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Salween 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Myanmar (Burma) Salween 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Thailand Salween 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Sembakung 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Malaysia Sembakung 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Sepik 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Sepik 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Cambodia East Asia and the Pacific Asia (Kampuchea) Song Vam Co Dong 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Vietnam Song Vam Co Dong 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Sujfun 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Tami 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Tami 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Tarim 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Indonesia Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia Papua New Guinea Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Tumen 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Korea, Democratic People's Republic of East Asia and the Pacific Asia (North) Tumen 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium East Asia and the Pacific Asia China Yalu 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Korea, Democratic People's Republic of East Asia and the Pacific Asia (North) Yalu 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Amur 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Aral Sea 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Aral Sea 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-3 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Europe and Central Asia Asia Tajikistan Aral Sea 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Aral Sea 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Uzbekistan Aral Sea 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Asi/Orontes 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Astara Chay 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Atrak 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Barta 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Barta 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Coruh 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Coruh 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Danube 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Bosnia and Europe and Central Asia Europe Herzegovina Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Danube 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Croatia Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Hungary Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Montenegro Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Danube 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Romania Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Slovakia Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Daugava 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Daugava 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Daugava 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Daugava 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Dnieper 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Dnieper 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Dnieper 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Dniester 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Dniester 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-4 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Dniester 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Don 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Don 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Drin 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Drin 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Montenegro Drin 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Drin 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Elancik 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Elancik 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Elbe 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Gauja 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Har Us Nur 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Hari/Harirud 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Ili/Kunes He 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Ili/Kunes He 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Jacobs 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Jenisej/Yenisey 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Kemi 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Kogilnik 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Kogilnik 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Bosnia and Europe and Central Asia Europe Herzegovina Krka 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Croatia Krka 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Armenia Kura-Araks 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Kura-Araks 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Kura-Araks 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Kura-Araks 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Lake Prespa 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Lake Prespa 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Lake Ubsa-Nur 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Lava/Pregel 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Lava/Pregel 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-5 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Lielupe 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Lielupe 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Maritsa 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Turkey Maritsa 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Mius 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Mius 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkmenistan Murgab 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Nahr El Kebir 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Narva 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Narva 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Narva 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Neman 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Neman 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Neman 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Neman 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Neman 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Bosnia and Europe and Central Asia Europe Herzegovina Neretva 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Croatia Neretva 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Nestos 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Ob 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Ob 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Oder/Odra 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Slovakia Oder/Odra 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Olanga 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Oral/Ural 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Oral/Ural 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Oulu 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Parnu 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Pasvik 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Prohladnaja 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Prohladnaja 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-6 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Pu Lun T'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Rezvaya 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Turkey Rezvaya 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Salaca 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Samur 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Samur 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Moldova Sarata 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Sarata 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Shu/Chu 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Shu/Chu 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Struma 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Struma 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Struma 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Sujfun 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Azerbaijan Sulak 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Sulak 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Sulak 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Kazakhstan Talas 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Talas 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Asia Kyrgyzstan Tarim 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Tajikistan Tarim 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Georgia Terek 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Terek 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Europe and Central Asia Asia Turkey Arab 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Tuloma 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Asia Russia Tumen 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Macedonia Vardar 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Serbia Vardar 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Bulgaria Velaka 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Turkey Velaka 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-7 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Europe and Central Asia Europe Latvia Venta 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Lithuania Venta 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Europe and Central Asia Europe Albania Vijose 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Vistula/Wista 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Poland Vistula/Wista 1 0 1 0 1 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Slovakia Vistula/Wista 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Ukraine Vistula/Wista 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Europe and Central Asia Europe Byelarus Volga 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Kazakhstan Volga 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Volga 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Europe and Central Asia Europe Russia Vuoksa 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Amacuro 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Amacuro 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Amazon 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Dominican Republic Artibonite 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Haiti Artibonite 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Aviles 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Aviles 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Aysen 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Aysen 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Baker 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Baker 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Barima 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Barima 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-8 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Belize 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Belize 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia Cancoso/Lauca 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Cancoso/Lauca 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Candelaria 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Candelaria 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Carmen Silva/Chico 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Carmen Silva/Chico 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Catatumbo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Catatumbo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Chamelecon 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Chamelecon 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Changuinola 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Changuinola 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Chira 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Chira 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Chiriqui 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Chiriqui 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Choluteca 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Choluteca 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Chuy 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Uruguay Chuy 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Coatan Achute 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Coatan Achute 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Coco/Segovia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Coco/Segovia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Colorado 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Comau 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Comau 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Conventillos 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Conventillos 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-9 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Corantijn/Courantyne 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Corantijn/Courantyne 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Corantijn/Courantyne 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Corredores/Colorado 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Corredores/Colorado 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Cullen 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Cullen 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica El Naranjo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua El Naranjo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Essequibo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Guyana Essequibo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Essequibo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Essequibo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Gallegos/Chico 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Gallegos/Chico 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America El Salvador Goascoran 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Goascoran 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Grijalva 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Grijalva 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Grijalva 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Hondo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Hondo 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Hondo 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Jurado 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Panama Jurado 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina La Plata 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia La Plata 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil La Plata 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-10 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Latin America and Caribbean South America Paraguay La Plata 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Uruguay La Plata 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Lagoon Mirim 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Uruguay Lagoon Mirim 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Lake Fagnano 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Lake Fagnano 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Lake Titicaca-Poopo Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia System 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Lake Titicaca-Poopo Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile System 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Lake Titicaca-Poopo Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru System 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Latin America and Caribbean North America El Salvador Lempa 1 1 0 0 1 3 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Lempa 1 1 0 0 1 3 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Lempa 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Maroni 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Suriname Maroni 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Dominican Republic Massacre 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Haiti Massacre 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Mataje 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Mataje 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Mira 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Mira 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Moho 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Moho 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Motaqua 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Motaqua 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Honduras Negro 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua Negro 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Oiapoque/Oyupock 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Brazil Orinoco 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Orinoco 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-11 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Latin America and Caribbean South America Venezuela Orinoco 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Palena 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Palena 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Pascua 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Pascua 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Colombia Patia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Patia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America El Salvador Paz 1 1 0 0 1 3 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Paz 1 1 0 0 1 3 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Dominican Republic Pedernales 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Haiti Pedernales 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Puelo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Puelo 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Rio Grande (North Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico America) 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Rio Grande (South Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina America) 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Rio Grande (South Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile America) 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica San Juan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Nicaragua San Juan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina San Martin 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile San Martin 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Sarstun 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Sarstun 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Seno Union/Serrano 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Seno Union/Serrano 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Costa Rica Sixaola 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Panama Sixaola 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Suchiate 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Suchiate 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean North America Belize Temash 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-12 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Latin America and Caribbean North America Guatemala Temash 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Tijuana 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Tumbes 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Tumbes 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Valdivia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Valdivia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean North America Mexico Yaqui 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Yelcho 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Yelcho 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Argentina Zapaleri 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Bolivia Zapaleri 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Chile Zapaleri 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Latin America and Caribbean South America Ecuador Zarumilla 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Latin America and Caribbean South America Peru Zarumilla 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon An Nahr Al Kabir 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria An Nahr Al Kabir 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon Asi/Orontes 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Asi/Orontes 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Astara Chay 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Atrak 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Middle East and North Africa Africa Djibouti Awash 0 0 0 0 0 0 High BahuKalat/Rudkhane Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran hye 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Daoura 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Daoura 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Dasht 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Dra 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Dra 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Guir 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Guir 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Hari/Harirud 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Helmand 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-13 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Middle East and North Africa Asia Egypt Jordan 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Middle East and North Africa Asia Jordan Jordan 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon Jordan 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Jordan 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Kowl E Namaksar 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Kura-Araks 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Lake Chad 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Libya Lake Chad 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Medjerda 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Tunisia Medjerda 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Nahr El Kebir 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Niger 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Egypt Nile 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Oued Bon Naima 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Oued Bon Naima 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Algeria Tafna 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Middle East and North Africa Africa Morocco Tafna 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Middle East and North Africa Asia Iran Arab 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Middle East and North Africa Asia Iraq Arab 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Middle East and North Africa Asia Jordan Arab 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Middle East and North Africa Asia Syria Arab 1 1 0 0 1 3 Medium Middle East and North Africa Asia Lebanon Wadi Al Izziyah 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Not Available South America French Guiana Amazon 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Not Available Africa Western Sahara Atui 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Not Available South America French Guiana Maroni 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-14 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Not Available South America French Guiana Oiapoque/Oyupock 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Alsek 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Alsek 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Bann 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Bann 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Bidasoa 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Bidasoa 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Castletown 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Castletown 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Chilkat 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Chilkat 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Colorado 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Columbia 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-15 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Columbia 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Austria Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Danube 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Danube 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Douro/Duero 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Douro/Duero 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Ebro 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Ebro 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Austria Elbe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Elbe 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-16 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Elbe 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Erne 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Erne 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Fane 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Fane 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Firth 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Firth 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Flurry 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Flurry 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Ireland Foyle 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe United Kingdom Foyle 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Fraser 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-17 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Fraser 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Garonne 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Garonne 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Glama 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Sweden Glama 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Guadiana 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Guadiana 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Asia South Korea Han 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Isonzo 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Jacobs 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Kemi 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Klaralven 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-18 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Sweden Klaralven 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Lake Prespa 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Lima 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Lima 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Maritsa 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Mino 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Mino 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Mississippi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Mississippi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Naatamo 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Naatamo 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Nelson-Saskatchewan 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-19 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Nelson-Saskatchewan 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Nestos 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Oder/Odra 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Oder/Odra 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Olanga 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Oulu 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Pasvik 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Pasvik 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Po 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Po 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Po 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Austria Rhine 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-20 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Rhine 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Rhine 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Rhine 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Rhine 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Luxembourg Rhine 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Netherlands Rhine 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Rhine 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Rhone 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Switzerland Rhone 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Rio Grande (North Cooperation and Development North America America America) 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Roia 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Italy Roia 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-21 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Schelde 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Schelde 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Netherlands Schelde 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Seine 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Seine 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Luxembourg Seine 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Skagit 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Skagit 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada St. Croix 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America St. Croix 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic St. John (North Cooperation and Development North America Canada America) 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of St. John (North Cooperation and Development North America America America) 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-22 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada St. Lawrence 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America St. Lawrence 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Stikine 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Stikine 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Struma 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Portugal Tagus/Tejo 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Spain Tagus/Tejo 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Taku 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Taku 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Tana 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Tana 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Tijuana 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-23 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Torne/Tornealven 1 1 0 0 1 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Norway Torne/Tornealven 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Sweden Torne/Tornealven 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Tuloma 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Vardar 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Greece Vijose 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Czech Republic Vistula/Wista 1 0 1 1 0 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Finland Vuoksa 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Whiting 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Whiting 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Denmark Wiedau 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Germany Wiedau 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-24 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Yaqui 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe Belgium Yser 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Europe France Yser 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development North America Canada Yukon 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Organisation for Economic United States of Cooperation and Development North America America Yukon 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Other High Income Economies Asia Brunei Bangau 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Other High Income Economies Europe Slovenia Danube 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Other High Income Economies Europe Andorra Ebro 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Other High Income Economies Europe Andorra Garonne 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Gauja 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Other High Income Economies Europe Slovenia Isonzo 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Other High Income Economies Asia Israel Jordan 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Narva 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Other High Income Economies Asia Brunei Pandaruan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Parnu 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Other High Income Economies Europe Liechtenstein Rhine 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-25 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Other High Income Economies Europe Estonia Salaca 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Other High Income Economies Asia Saudi Arabia Arab 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Other High Income Economies Asia Israel Wadi Al Izziyah 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Afghanistan Aral Sea 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium BahuKalat/Rudkhane South Asia Asia Pakistan hye 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Pakistan Dasht 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Bangladesh Fenney 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia India Fenney 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Ganges-Brahmaputra- South Asia Asia Bangladesh Meghna 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Ganges-Brahmaputra- South Asia Asia Bhutan Meghna 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Ganges-Brahmaputra- South Asia Asia India Meghna 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Ganges-Brahmaputra- South Asia Asia Nepal Meghna 1 1 1 1 0 4 Low South Asia Asia Afghanistan Hari/Harirud 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Afghanistan Helmand 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium South Asia Asia Pakistan Helmand 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Afghanistan Indus 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium South Asia Asia India Indus 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low South Asia Asia Pakistan Indus 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low South Asia Asia India Irrawaddy 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia India Kaladan 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Bangladesh Karnaphuli 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia India Karnaphuli 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-26 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level South Asia Asia Afghanistan Kowl E Namaksar 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Afghanistan Murgab 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Afghanistan Tarim 0 0 0 0 0 0 High South Asia Asia Pakistan Tarim 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Akpa 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Akpa 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mauritania Atui 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Awash 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Somalia Awash 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Eritrea Baraka 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Baraka 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Benito/Ntem 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Benito/Ntem 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Benito/Ntem 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Bia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Bia 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Buzi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Buzi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Cavally 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Cavally 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Cavally 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Cestos 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Cestos 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Cestos 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Chiloango 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Congo, Democratic Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of (Kinshasa) Chiloango 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Congo, Republic of the Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Brazzaville) Chiloango 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Congo/Zaire 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burundi Congo/Zaire 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-27 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Congo/Zaire 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Central African Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic Congo/Zaire 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Congo, Democratic Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of (Kinshasa) Congo/Zaire 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Congo, Republic of the Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Brazzaville) Congo/Zaire 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Congo/Zaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Malawi Congo/Zaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Rwanda Congo/Zaire 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Congo/Zaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Tanzania, United Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of Congo/Zaire 1 1 0 1 0 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Congo/Zaire 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zambia Congo/Zaire 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Corubal 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea-Bissau Corubal 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Cross 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Cross 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Cuvelai/Etosha 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Cuvelai/Etosha 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gambia, The Gambia 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Gambia 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea-Bissau Gambia 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Senegal Gambia 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Eritrea Gash 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Gash 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Gash 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Geba 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea-Bissau Geba 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Senegal Geba 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Great Scarcies 1 1 1 0 0 3 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-28 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Great Scarcies 1 1 1 0 0 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Incomati 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Incomati 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Swaziland Incomati 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Juba-Shibeli 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Juba-Shibeli 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Somalia Juba-Shibeli 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burkina Faso Komoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Komoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Komoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Komoe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Kunene 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Kunene 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Lake Chad 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Central African Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic Lake Chad 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Chad Lake Chad 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Niger Lake Chad 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Lake Chad 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Lake Chad 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Lake Natron 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Tanzania, United Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of Lake Natron 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Lake Turkana 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Lake Turkana 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Lake Turkana 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Lake Turkana 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Limpopo 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Limpopo 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Limpopo 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Limpopo 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Little Scarcies 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-29 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Little Scarcies 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Loffa 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Loffa 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Lotagipi Swamp 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Lotagipi Swamp 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Lotagipi Swamp 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Lotagipi Swamp 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Mana-Morro 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Mana-Morro 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Maputo 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Maputo 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Swaziland Maputo 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Mbe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Mbe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Moa 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia Moa 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sierra Leone Moa 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Mono 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Togo Mono 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burkina Faso Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Chad Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Niger Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Niger 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burundi Nile 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Central African Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic Nile 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-30 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Congo, Democratic Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of (Kinshasa) Nile 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Eritrea Nile 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ethiopia Nile 1 1 0 0 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Nile 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Rwanda Nile 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Sudan Nile 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Tanzania, United Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of Nile 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Uganda Nile 1 0 1 1 1 4 Low Congo, Republic of the Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Brazzaville) Nyanga 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Nyanga 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Ogooue 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Congo, Republic of the Sub-Saharan Africa Africa (Brazzaville) Ogooue 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Ogooue 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Ogooue 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Okavango 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Okavango 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Okavango 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Okavango 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Orange 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Lesotho Orange 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Orange 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Orange 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Oueme 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Oueme 1 0 0 0 0 1 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Togo Oueme 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Pangani 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Tanzania, United Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of Pangani 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-31 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Pungwe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Pungwe 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Malawi Ruvuma 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Ruvuma 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Tanzania, United Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of Ruvuma 1 0 0 1 0 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Sabi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Sabi 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Cameroon Sanaga 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Central African Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic Sanaga 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Nigeria Sanaga 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Sassandra 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Sassandra 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea Senegal 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Senegal 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mauritania Senegal 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Senegal Senegal 1 1 0 1 1 4 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea St. John (Africa) 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia St. John (Africa) 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Guinea St. Paul 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Liberia St. Paul 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Tano 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Tano 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Lesotho Thukela 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Thukela 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Kenya Umba 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Tanzania, United Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of Umba 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Umbeluzi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa South Africa Umbeluzi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Swaziland Umbeluzi 1 1 1 0 1 4 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-32 Treaty RBO Treaty/ Basin Presence/ Variability Conflict Presence/ RBO Vulnerability World Bank Region Continent Country Name Basin Name Absence Allocation Management Resolution Absence Score Level Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Equatorial Guinea Utamboni 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Gabon Utamboni 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Benin Volta 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Burkina Faso Volta 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ghana Volta 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Ivory Coast Volta 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mali Volta 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Togo Volta 1 0 0 1 1 3 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Angola Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Botswana Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Congo, Democratic Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of (Kinshasa) Zambezi 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Malawi Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Mozambique Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Namibia Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Tanzania, United Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Republic of Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zambia Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Sub-Saharan Africa Africa Zimbabwe Zambezi 1 1 1 1 1 5 Low Appendix 4 - Treaty/RBO scores by CBU A4-33 Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk The data in this appendix are organized by risk levels as diagrammed in Figure 8 of the main text. Country-basin units are listed alphabetically in each category of combined vulnerability and hazard. In addition, the relative importance of the basin in several dimensions appear to the right of each CBU. The percentages listed are the proportions of the basin that the CBU contributes to the basin total for each variable (area from TFDD; population from Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008; runoff from Fekete, Vorosmarty and Grabs 2000; irrigated area from Doll and Siebert 2001). Figures A5-1, A5-2 and A5-2 are the global maps of vulnerability-hazard combinations shown in the main text. High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Mauritania - Atui Ecuador - Chira Mozambique - Incomati High Hazard 64.6% 86.8% N.A. N.A. 38.1% 27.4% 59.7% 30.4% 31.3% 18.1% 0.0% 36.2% Western Sahara - Atui 35.4% 13.2% N.A. N.A. Peru - Chira 61.9% 72.6% 40.3% 69.6% Namibia - Kunene 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Lake Titicaca- Djibouti - Awash 7.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Eritrea - Gash 53.6% 44.8% 58.0% 10.0% Poopo System 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Somalia - Awash 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% Sudan - Gash 23.9% 25.2% 0.0% 85.0% Niger - Niger 23.6% 11.6% 0.8% 17.2% Iran - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye 99.8% 99.8% N.A. 100.0% Egypt - Jordan 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Egypt - Nile 9.2% 25.6% 0.0% 19.3% Bolivia - Cancoso/Lauca 85.8% 96.2% 70.0% 100.0% Somalia - Juba-Shibeli 27.5% 19.6% 1.6% 48.1% Mongolia - Ob 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Cancoso/Lauca 14.2% 3.8% 30.0% 0.0% Niger - Lake Chad 28.2% 5.7% 0.4% 23.8% Botswana - Okavango 50.7% 30.2% 7.1% 9.9% Uganda - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Limpopo 15.1% 5.5% 8.7% 7.4% Botswana - Orange 12.9% 1.3% 0.0% 3.3% Algeria - Daoura 47.3% 1.2% N.A. 0.0% Eritrea - Nile 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Namibia - Orange 25.4% 1.6% 0.0% 35.9% Jordan - Tigris- Morocco - Daoura 52.7% 98.8% N.A. 100.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mauritania - Senegal 50.3% 32.4% 2.0% 62.8% Iran - Dasht 21.5% 4.4% N.A. 3.0% Ecuador - Tumbes 71.1% 74.3% 100.0% 82.3% South Africa - Umbeluzi 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Dasht 78.5% 95.6% N.A. 97.0% Peru - Tumbes 28.9% 25.7% 0.0% 17.7% Botswana - Zambezi 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Algeria - Dra 21.4% 0.3% 0.0% 4.0% Ivory Coast - Volta 3.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% Namibia - Zambezi 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Ethiopia - Gash 22.5% 30.0% 42.0% 5.0% Mexico - Yaqui 94.1% 94.8% 100.0% 97.7% Ecuador - Zarumilla 78.7% 71.4% N.A. 88.4% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-1 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area United States of America - Algeria - Guir 77.5% 83.5% N.A. 85.5% Yaqui 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.3% Peru - Zarumilla 21.3% 28.6% N.A. 11.6% Morocco - Guir 22.5% 16.5% N.A. 14.5% Algeria - Lake Chad 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Libya - Lake Chad 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Sudan - Lake Chad 3.5% 6.7% 4.8% 4.5% Sudan - Lake Turkana 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Ethiopia - Lotagipi Swamp 8.4% 7.3% 40.3% N.A. Kenya - Lotagipi Swamp 52.4% 63.5% 29.4% N.A. Sudan - Lotagipi Swamp 34.1% 18.9% 30.2% N.A. Uganda - Lotagipi Swamp 5.1% 10.2% 0.0% N.A. Algeria - Niger 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Algeria - Oued Bon Naima 36.6% 33.8% N.A. 15.2% Morocco - Oued Bon Naima 63.4% 66.2% N.A. 84.8% Togo - Oueme 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Morocco - Tafna 25.4% 39.1% 0.0% 41.2% Pakistan - Tarim 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% Saudi Arabia - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kenya - Umba 16.9% 11.9% 88.0% 0.0% Argentina - Zapaleri 19.8% 2.4% 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Zapaleri 21.7% 19.5% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Zapaleri 58.5% 78.1% 0.0% N.A. Guyana - Amacuro Bolivia - Amazon China - Amur ard 13.1% 85.0% 0.0% N.A. 12.0% 23.8% 4.4% 11.9% 42.6% 94.4% 26.6% 83.4% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-2 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Medium Haza Venezuela - Amacuro 86.9% 15.0% 100.0% N.A. Ecuador - Amazon 2.1% 6.1% 0.6% 24.7% Mongolia - Amur 9.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% French Guiana - Amazon 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Suriname - Amazon 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Aral Sea 34.5% 5.2% 8.8% 31.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Lebanon - An Nahr Al (North) - Amur 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kabir 32.6% 38.4% 100.0% 60.6% Kyrgyzstan - Aral Sea 9.1% 5.8% 23.4% 4.2% China - Aral Sea 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Syria - An Nahr Al Kabir 67.4% 61.6% 0.0% 39.4% Tajikistan - Aral Sea 11.0% 15.3% 22.4% 10.7% Turkey - Asi/Orontes 49.9% 31.3% 54.7% 46.2% Afghanistan - Aral Sea 8.5% 12.1% 34.3% 2.8% Uzbekistan - Aral Sea 31.1% 58.8% 9.3% 46.4% Azerbaijan - Astara Chay 17.4% 27.1% N.A. 0.0% Turkmenistan - Aral Sea 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 4.8% Mexico - Colorado 1.6% 5.4% 0.0% 14.4% Dominican Republic - United States of America - Iran - Astara Chay 82.6% 72.9% N.A. 100.0% Artibonite 27.2% 10.0% 45.3% 19.2% Colorado 98.4% 94.6% 100.0% 85.6% Argentina - Aviles 88.8% 94.1% N.A. N.A. Haiti - Artibonite 72.8% 90.0% 54.7% 80.8% Bulgaria - Danube 5.2% 4.0% 7.0% 4.7% Chile - Aviles 11.2% 5.9% N.A. N.A. Lebanon - Asi/Orontes 5.8% 3.1% 3.0% 4.8% Croatia - Danube 4.5% 3.9% 7.9% 0.0% Ethiopia - Awash 92.7% 99.5% 100.0% 99.7% Syria - Asi/Orontes 44.3% 65.6% 42.3% 49.0% Czech Republic - Danube 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 1.0% Pakistan - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye 0.2% 0.2% N.A. 0.0% Iran - Atrak 68.9% 95.0% 97.1% 95.8% Hungary - Danube 11.7% 12.2% 1.9% 7.8% Argentina - Baker 31.6% 26.9% 26.3% 9.6% Turkmenistan - Atrak 31.1% 5.0% 2.9% 4.2% Moldova - Danube 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 2.5% Chile - Baker 68.4% 73.1% 73.7% 90.4% Guatemala - Candelaria 14.5% 3.3% 0.0% N.A. Poland - Danube 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Eritrea - Baraka 62.7% 90.7% N.A. 19.1% Mexico - Candelaria 85.5% 96.7% 100.0% N.A. Serbia - Danube 9.4% 10.0% 4.7% 1.0% Guatemala - Coatan Sudan - Baraka 37.3% 9.3% N.A. 80.9% Achute 12.6% 17.4% N.A. 0.0% Ukraine - Danube 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 4.9% Guyana - Barima 52.2% 99.3% 100.0% N.A. Mexico - Coatan Achute 87.4% 82.6% N.A. 100.0% Portugal - Douro/Duero 18.2% 50.4% 38.3% 22.1% Venezuela - Barima 47.8% 0.7% 0.0% N.A. Angola - Congo/Zaire 7.9% 1.9% 7.6% 0.0% Spain - Douro/Duero 81.8% 49.6% 61.7% 77.9% Vietnam - Bei Jiang/Hsi 2.4% 1.1% 2.7% 0.4% Burundi - Congo/Zaire 0.4% 4.6% 0.2% 0.5% Czech Republic - Elbe 36.1% 25.9% 38.4% 37.5% China - Beilun 84.0% 69.2% 100.0% 95.8% Rwanda - Congo/Zaire 0.1% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% Germany - Elbe 62.7% 73.2% 61.6% 62.5% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-3 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Tanzania, United Vietnam - Beilun 16.0% 30.8% 0.0% 4.2% Republic of - Congo/Zaire 4.5% 5.9% 1.9% 2.0% Canada - Firth 59.6% N.A. 0.0% N.A. United States of America - Ghana - Bia 58.9% 60.4% 37.4% 0.0% Zambia - Congo/Zaire 4.8% 2.8% 6.0% 0.5% Firth 40.4% N.A. 100.0% N.A. Ivory Coast - Bia 41.1% 39.6% 62.6% 100.0% Guinea - Corubal 72.9% 88.7% 66.2% 0.0% Gambia, The - Gambia 8.5% 28.5% 12.5% 68.8% Mozambique - Buzi 88.7% 76.3% 86.3% 52.2% Argentina - Cullen 17.1% 9.9% 0.0% N.A. Senegal - Gambia 72.6% 42.3% 57.8% 4.3% Zimbabwe - Buzi 11.3% 23.7% 13.7% 47.8% Chile - Cullen 82.9% 90.1% 100.0% N.A. Spain - Garonne 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Argentina - Carmen Silva/Chico 59.2% 97.2% 100.0% N.A. Lithuania - Daugava 1.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Guadiana 18.9% 17.4% 38.8% 11.8% Chile - Carmen Silva/Chico 40.8% 2.8% 0.0% N.A. Ukraine - Dnieper 58.0% 69.1% 40.1% 96.5% Spain - Guadiana 81.1% 82.6% 61.2% 88.2% Colombia - Catatumbo 63.3% 73.0% 62.2% 82.4% Moldova - Dniester 24.6% 36.6% 2.2% 56.4% China - Har Us Nur 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Venezuela - Catatumbo 36.7% 27.0% 37.8% 17.6% Poland - Dniester 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mongolia - Har Us Nur 96.8% 97.6% 97.9% 100.0% Guinea - Cavally 4.2% 8.8% 5.6% 0.0% Ukraine - Dniester 75.3% 63.4% 97.8% 43.6% South Africa - Incomati 62.3% 73.5% 100.0% 57.8% Guinea - Cestos 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Albania - Drin 45.6% 37.5% 56.5% 60.2% Swaziland - Incomati 6.3% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0% Ivory Coast - Cestos 15.3% 59.1% 24.3% 0.0% Macedonia - Drin 13.2% 8.8% 6.4% 10.5% India - Indus 33.7% 35.0% 61.3% 38.6% Guatemala - Chamelecon 2.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Gambia 18.9% 29.3% 29.7% 26.9% Pakistan - Indus 52.5% 60.4% 10.1% 60.1% Honduras - Chamelecon 97.2% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Guinea - Geba 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Israel - Jordan 27.0% 4.2% 42.5% 31.3% Angola - Chiloango 32.5% 5.7% 30.3% N.A. Senegal - Geba 32.2% 35.1% 20.9% 0.0% Jordan - Jordan 57.1% 83.4% 20.6% 43.2% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Chiloango 64.7% 92.7% 69.7% N.A. Mexico - Grijalva 61.6% 62.3% 56.3% 96.5% Lebanon - Jordan 2.1% 1.0% 26.9% 2.3% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Chiloango 2.8% 1.5% 0.0% N.A. Afghanistan - Helmand 81.5% 85.8% 98.3% 74.3% Syria - Jordan 13.3% 11.5% 10.0% 23.2% Honduras - Choluteca 96.6% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Iran - Helmand 15.5% 12.5% 0.3% 25.3% Angola - Kunene 86.7% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% Nicaragua - Choluteca 3.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Hondo 29.8% 1.8% 51.5% 0.0% Argentina - La Plata 27.7% 16.5% 11.2% 40.8% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-4 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Honduras - Coco/Segovia 24.3% 7.4% 43.4% 7.3% Mexico - Hondo 57.2% 91.3% 40.7% 97.7% Brazil - La Plata 46.7% 70.2% 71.7% 29.5% Nicaragua - Coco/Segovia 75.7% 92.6% 56.6% 92.7% China - Ili/Kunes He 34.3% 51.0% 10.7% 27.2% Paraguay - La Plata 13.5% 9.8% 8.7% 24.6% Malawi - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Ili/Kunes He 60.2% 48.0% 64.8% 67.7% Uruguay - La Plata 3.8% 1.1% 5.5% 2.8% Sudan - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kyrgyzstan - Ili/Kunes He 5.5% 1.0% 24.5% 5.1% Brazil - Lagoon Mirim 43.2% 53.8% 43.9% 65.8% Brazil - Corantijn/Courantyne 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Afghanistan - Indus 6.3% 4.6% 9.6% 1.3% Uruguay - Lagoon Mirim 56.8% 46.2% 56.1% 34.2% Guyana - Bolivia - Lake Titicaca- Corantijn/Courantyne 52.0% 40.1% 38.9% N.A. Ethiopia - Juba-Shibeli 45.7% 66.5% 66.8% 48.1% Poopo System 56.4% 49.9% 44.1% 81.6% Suriname - Peru - Lake Titicaca- Corantijn/Courantyne 47.9% 59.9% 61.1% N.A. Kenya - Juba-Shibeli 26.8% 14.0% 31.5% 3.9% Poopo System 42.9% 50.1% 55.9% 18.4% Turkey - Coruh 91.1% 79.5% 88.3% 100.0% Finland - Kemi 94.4% 96.9% 96.3% N.A. Portugal - Lima 48.2% 66.5% 100.0% 74.7% Angola - Cuvelai/Etosha 31.8% 16.1% 76.4% 0.0% Russia - Kemi 5.6% 3.1% 3.7% N.A. Spain - Lima 51.8% 33.5% 0.0% 25.3% Namibia - Cuvelai/Etosha 68.2% 83.9% 23.6% 100.0% Armenia - Kura-Araks 15.3% 22.9% 7.7% 9.0% Mozambique - Limpopo 21.0% 7.5% 0.0% 47.9% Ukraine - Don 12.8% 33.6% 17.4% 49.9% Azerbaijan - Kura-Araks 32.0% 34.6% 12.2% 40.2% South Africa - Limpopo 44.3% 78.8% 91.3% 38.7% Morocco - Dra 78.6% 99.7% 100.0% 96.0% Iran - Kura-Araks 20.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% Mozambique - Maputo 5.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% Serbia - Drin 28.8% 46.3% 37.1% 26.1% Bolivia - La Plata 8.3% 2.3% 2.9% 2.4% South Africa - Maputo 60.1% 39.4% 70.1% 36.8% Andorra - Ebro 0.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% Cameroon - Lake Chad 2.0% 6.1% 12.9% 12.7% Swaziland - Maputo 34.9% 59.7% 29.9% 62.4% Central African Republic - Russia - Elancik 73.0% 56.6% N.A. 0.0% Lake Chad 9.1% 2.8% 24.4% 0.0% Portugal - Mino 4.2% 5.6% 0.0% 13.3% Ukraine - Elancik 27.0% 43.4% N.A. 100.0% Chad - Lake Chad 45.7% 22.2% 38.0% 32.7% Spain - Mino 95.8% 94.4% 100.0% 86.7% Austria - Elbe 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Nigeria - Lake Chad 7.5% 56.5% 19.5% 26.3% Canada - Mississippi 1.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% United States of America - Brazil - Essequibo 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Albania - Lake Prespa 88.1% 97.9% 100.0% 94.3% Mississippi 98.4% 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-5 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area United States of America - Guyana - Essequibo 67.9% 83.1% 81.2% 66.8% Greece - Lake Prespa 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0% Nelson-Saskatchewan 14.1% 12.4% 12.6% 5.7% Suriname - Essequibo 10.1% 4.3% 6.1% 33.2% Macedonia - Lake Prespa 8.6% 1.8% 0.0% 4.7% Benin - Niger 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% 0.6% Bangladesh - Fenney 34.3% 75.6% 0.0% 47.9% Ethiopia - Lake Turkana 54.8% 81.9% 79.4% 85.1% Burkina Faso - Niger 3.9% 3.0% 1.0% 0.7% India - Fenney 65.7% 24.4% 100.0% 52.1% Kenya - Lake Turkana 43.3% 17.7% 20.4% 14.9% Chad - Niger 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% Argentina - Gallegos/Chico 60.7% 81.9% 0.0% N.A. Uganda - Lake Turkana 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Niger 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.1% Chile - Gallegos/Chico 39.3% 18.1% 100.0% N.A. Poland - Lava/Pregel 24.7% 15.5% 21.2% 100.0% Mali - Niger 25.6% 9.6% 5.9% 59.4% Andorra - Garonne 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% El Salvador - Lempa 56.5% 85.0% 38.7% 92.4% Burundi - Nile 0.4% 2.8% 0.8% 0.0% El Salvador - Goascoran 47.7% 71.9% 51.1% 0.0% Guatemala - Lempa 14.0% 7.3% 36.0% 6.9% Kenya - Nile 1.7% 8.3% 6.0% 0.0% Honduras - Goascoran 52.3% 28.1% 48.9% 100.0% Honduras - Lempa 29.5% 7.7% 25.3% 0.7% Rwanda - Nile 0.7% 4.6% 1.8% 0.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Han 28.7% 4.4% 39.6% 30.9% Botswana - Limpopo 19.6% 8.1% 0.0% 6.0% Sudan - Nile 63.6% 18.9% 38.2% 77.4% Tanzania, United South Korea - Han 71.3% 95.6% 60.4% 69.1% Bulgaria - Maritsa 66.5% 67.3% 58.1% 67.2% Republic of - Nile 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% 0.0% Russia - Har Us Nur 3.0% 2.4% 2.1% 0.0% Turkey - Maritsa 25.9% 29.5% 37.9% 21.0% Uganda - Nile 7.9% 17.1% 6.9% 0.4% Afghanistan - Hari/Harirud 44.3% 37.5% 68.3% 14.4% French Guiana - Maroni 41.8% 54.7% 34.9% 100.0% China - Ob 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.5% Iran - Hari/Harirud 38.3% 56.4% 31.7% 63.9% Suriname - Maroni 58.0% 45.3% 65.1% 0.0% Germany - Oder/Odra 6.2% 4.1% 4.0% 24.3% Turkmenistan - Dominican Republic - Hari/Harirud 17.4% 6.2% 0.0% 21.7% Massacre 45.7% 23.0% 0.0% 61.1% Poland - Oder/Odra 84.2% 84.4% 89.5% 75.4% Pakistan - Helmand 3.0% 1.7% 1.4% 0.4% Haiti - Massacre 54.3% 77.0% 100.0% 38.9% Slovakia - Oder/Odra 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% Myanmar (Burma) - Belize - Hondo 13.0% 6.9% 7.8% 2.3% Mekong 3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 2.8% Angola - Okavango 21.2% 34.1% 92.0% 63.1% China - Indus 7.5% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% Latvia - Neman 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Namibia - Okavango 24.9% 21.8% 0.7% 27.0% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-6 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Moldova - Kogilnik 57.1% 82.1% 89.7% 100.0% Poland - Neman 4.2% 3.6% 5.2% 1.6% Lesotho - Orange 2.1% 12.8% 37.5% 0.7% Central African Republic - Ukraine - Kogilnik 42.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% Nile 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% South Africa - Orange 59.7% 84.3% 62.5% 60.1% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Burkina Faso - Komoe 21.7% 21.3% 20.2% 39.5% Nile 0.7% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% Finland - Pasvik 77.2% 41.6% 100.0% N.A. Ghana - Komoe 2.9% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Ob 25.2% 22.8% 9.2% 86.1% China - Pu Lun T'o 87.5% 97.9% 100.0% 98.0% Ivory Coast - Komoe 74.6% 67.6% 79.8% 60.5% Finland - Olanga 10.5% 36.8% 12.6% N.A. Mongolia - Pu Lun T'o 12.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% Mali - Komoe 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Benin - Oueme 82.9% 81.8% 91.3% 89.4% Belgium - Rhine 8.0% 5.3% 6.0% 5.1% Afghanistan - Kowl E Namaksar 28.8% 6.6% 0.0% 3.0% Nigeria - Oueme 16.4% 17.9% 8.7% 10.6% France - Rhine 13.3% 7.3% 11.7% 8.3% Iran - Kowl E Namaksar 71.2% 93.4% 100.0% 97.0% El Salvador - Paz 45.8% 71.0% N.A. 76.0% Germany - Rhine 56.6% 66.1% 41.4% 36.5% Georgia - Kura-Araks 17.7% 19.0% 33.5% 22.3% Guatemala - Paz 54.2% 29.0% N.A. 24.0% Luxembourg - Rhine 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% Turkey - Kura-Araks 14.3% 7.0% 29.8% 12.4% France - Po 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Netherlands - Rhine 5.7% 8.6% 2.1% 25.5% Mexico - Rio Grande Argentina - Lake Fagnano 85.0% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Bulgaria - Rezvaya 18.4% 2.3% N.A. N.A. (North America) 48.2% 75.4% 50.1% 68.5% United States of America - Rio Grande (North Chile - Lake Fagnano 15.0% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Rezvaya 81.6% 97.7% N.A. N.A. America) 51.8% 24.6% 49.9% 31.5% Kenya - Lake Natron 33.0% 39.8% 27.0% 0.0% France - Roia 67.2% 34.2% N.A. 14.3% Mali - Senegal 34.6% 36.5% 49.0% 13.1% Tanzania, United Republic of - Lake Natron 67.0% 60.2% 73.0% 100.0% Italy - Roia 32.8% 65.8% N.A. 85.7% Senegal - Senegal 8.1% 16.4% 8.3% 22.9% Mongolia - Lake Ubsa- Nur 75.9% 78.7% 86.6% 63.1% Mozambique - Ruvuma 65.2% 26.4% 71.8% 75.6% Canada - St. Croix 35.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% Tanzania, United United States of America - Indonesia - Loes 16.3% 6.6% N.A. 0.0% Republic of - Ruvuma 34.5% 70.8% 28.2% 24.4% St. Croix 64.9% 48.6% 100.0% 100.0% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-7 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area United States of America - Timor Leste - Loes 83.7% 93.4% N.A. 100.0% Belgium - Schelde 49.3% 56.5% 55.9% 36.8% St. John (North America) 36.5% 17.9% 40.1% 100.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ma 43.8% 11.5% 44.2% 16.0% France - Schelde 50.2% 43.4% 44.1% 62.5% Greece - Struma 26.2% 22.3% 18.7% 31.3% Vietnam - Ma 56.2% 88.5% 55.8% 84.0% Netherlands - Schelde 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% Macedonia - Struma 11.7% 13.5% 0.0% 16.1% Greece - Maritsa 7.6% 3.1% 4.0% 11.8% Belgium - Seine 2.2% 0.8% 7.0% 0.8% Serbia - Struma 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% Brazil - Maroni 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% France - Seine 97.7% 99.0% 93.0% 99.2% Portugal - Tagus/Tejo 33.5% 33.9% 55.4% 42.1% Colombia - Mataje 28.6% 43.5% N.A. 0.0% Luxembourg - Seine 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Spain - Tagus/Tejo 66.5% 66.1% 44.6% 57.9% Iraq - Tigris- Ecuador - Mataje 71.4% 56.5% N.A. 100.0% Guinea - Senegal 7.1% 14.7% 40.7% 1.2% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 40.5% 45.0% 19.1% 55.2% Turkey - Tigris- Algeria - Medjerda 33.3% 33.0% 22.3% 9.8% Kazakhstan - Shu/Chu 93.0% 27.3% 92.5% 87.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 24.8% 21.7% 53.3% 14.8% Tunisia - Medjerda 66.7% 67.0% 77.7% 90.2% Kyrgyzstan - Shu/Chu 7.0% 72.7% 7.5% 13.0% Mexico - Tijuana 73.3% 95.8% N.A. 84.0% United States of America - Colombia - Mira 51.8% 38.7% 85.5% 1.3% Guatemala - Suchiate 73.5% 65.8% 0.0% 60.0% Tijuana 26.7% 4.2% N.A. 16.0% Ecuador - Mira 48.2% 61.3% 14.5% 98.7% Mexico - Suchiate 26.5% 34.2% 100.0% 40.0% Mozambique - Umbeluzi 67.3% 92.6% 4.0% 20.0% Russia - Mius 70.4% 75.8% 0.0% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Talas 79.3% 74.9% 31.4% 78.8% Swaziland - Umbeluzi 32.5% 7.4% 96.0% 80.0% Ukraine - Mius 29.6% 24.2% 100.0% 100.0% Kyrgyzstan - Talas 20.7% 25.1% 68.6% 21.2% Ukraine - Vistula/Wista 6.7% 7.9% 4.8% 0.0% United States of America - Benin - Mono 5.0% 14.4% 0.0% 2.3% Finland - Tana 41.1% 37.1% 83.8% N.A. Yukon 60.2% 77.1% 63.0% 100.0% Togo - Mono 95.0% 85.6% 100.0% 97.7% Norway - Tana 58.9% 62.9% 16.2% N.A. Angola - Zambezi 18.4% 1.1% 22.1% 0.0% Iran - Tigris- Honduras - Motaqua 11.5% 3.6% 8.7% 0.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 19.7% 17.1% 26.2% 12.9% Malawi - Zambezi 8.0% 35.2% 6.0% 3.7% Syria - Tigris- Afghanistan - Murgab 59.8% 66.3% 90.0% 18.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 14.7% 16.2% 1.4% 17.1% Mozambique - Zambezi 11.8% 7.6% 6.8% 17.2% Finland - Tanzania, United Turkmenistan - Murgab 40.2% 33.7% 10.0% 82.0% Torne/Tornealven 28.6% 36.4% 43.2% N.A. Republic of - Zambezi 2.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.2% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-8 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Syria - Nahr El Kebir 86.4% 93.5% N.A. 100.0% China - Tumen 69.7% 70.3% 50.1% 67.6% Zambia - Zambezi 41.6% 27.4% 54.9% 55.0% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Turkey - Nahr El Kebir 13.6% 6.5% N.A. 0.0% (North) - Tumen 28.6% 29.6% 49.9% 32.4% Zimbabwe - Zambezi 15.5% 23.7% 8.2% 23.7% Honduras - Negro 10.7% 24.3% 59.4% 0.5% Russia - Tumen 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Nicaragua - Negro 89.3% 75.7% 40.6% 99.5% Greece - Vardar 12.0% 4.9% 0.0% 19.9% Croatia - Neretva 3.5% 3.1% 0.0% 2.5% Macedonia - Vardar 63.5% 52.9% 75.1% 70.1% Bulgaria - Nestos 53.4% 61.6% 54.9% 31.8% Serbia - Vardar 24.5% 42.2% 24.9% 10.0% Greece - Nestos 46.6% 38.4% 45.1% 68.2% Albania - Vijose 64.5% 93.8% 55.3% 85.5% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Nyanga 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% N.A. Greece - Vijose 35.5% 6.2% 44.7% 14.5% Gabon - Nyanga 93.4% 97.3% 100.0% N.A. Byelarus - Vistula/Wista 5.1% 2.4% 2.9% 8.8% French Guiana - Oiapoque/Oyupock 59.8% 25.4% 66.0% N.A. Poland - Vistula/Wista 87.2% 88.9% 89.2% 90.9% Zimbabwe - Okavango 3.2% 13.9% 0.3% 0.0% Slovakia - Vistula/Wista 1.0% 0.9% 3.1% 0.3% Kenya - Pangani 2.6% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Volga 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Tanzania, United Republic of - Pangani 97.4% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% Kazakhstan - Volga 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Argentina - Pascua 46.1% 36.0% 41.5% N.A. Benin - Volta 3.6% 2.7% 5.3% 2.9% Chile - Pascua 53.9% 64.0% 58.5% N.A. Burkina Faso - Volta 42.1% 48.4% 24.6% 30.1% Colombia - Patia 97.6% 90.9% 100.0% 78.9% Ghana - Volta 40.2% 37.0% 47.3% 60.6% Ecuador - Patia 2.4% 9.1% 0.0% 21.1% Mali - Volta 4.6% 2.7% 1.0% 0.9% Poland - Prohladnaja 22.9% 13.6% N.A. 0.0% Togo - Volta 6.3% 7.9% 20.1% 3.9% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Russia - Pu Lun T'o 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Zambezi 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Argentina - Puelo 65.8% 88.0% 73.3% 100.0% Guinea-Bissau - Corubal 27.1% 11.3% 33.8% 100.0% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-9 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Mozambique - Pungwe 94.3% 92.8% 77.0% 100.0% Guinea-Bissau - Gambia 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Pungwe 5.7% 7.2% 23.0% 0.0% Guinea-Bissau - Geba 67.4% 64.6% 79.1% 100.0% China - Red/Song Hong 53.7% 38.4% 42.7% 55.3% Vietnam - Red/Song Hong 45.6% 61.6% 57.3% 44.7% Argentina - Rio Grande (South America) 49.6% 85.1% 30.4% N.A. Chile - Rio Grande (South America) 50.4% 14.9% 69.6% N.A. Malawi - Ruvuma 0.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% Mozambique - Sabi 26.1% 7.6% 9.3% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Sabi 73.9% 92.4% 90.7% 100.0% Thailand - Salween 3.7% 2.3% 7.8% 4.8% Azerbaijan - Samur 6.5% 2.5% 0.0% 14.2% Russia - Samur 93.5% 97.5% 100.0% 85.8% Nicaragua - San Juan 69.9% 88.5% 54.0% 69.8% Argentina - San Martin 12.2% 57.9% N.A. N.A. Chile - San Martin 87.8% 42.1% N.A. N.A. Central African Republic - Sanaga 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Moldova - Sarata 37.0% 57.2% 100.0% 100.0% Ukraine - Sarata 63.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Sassandra 12.3% 6.5% 22.6% 0.0% Argentina - Seno Union/Serrano 10.3% 1.1% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Seno Union/Serrano 89.7% 98.9% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - St. Paul 44.5% 55.1% 36.3% 0.0% Bulgaria - Struma 58.2% 63.4% 81.3% 52.6% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-10 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area China - Sujfun 64.7% 60.0% 64.3% 60.2% Russia - Sujfun 35.3% 40.0% 35.7% 39.8% Azerbaijan - Sulak 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Georgia - Sulak 7.3% 0.2% 25.6% 0.0% Russia - Sulak 92.4% 99.7% 74.4% 100.0% Algeria - Tafna 74.6% 60.9% 100.0% 58.8% Ghana - Tano 89.1% 94.1% 68.5% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Tano 10.9% 5.9% 31.5% 100.0% Afghanistan - Tarim 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Tarim 97.2% 99.8% 58.4% 99.5% Kyrgyzstan - Tarim 2.0% 0.1% 39.0% 0.5% Tajikistan - Tarim 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Georgia - Terek 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Lesotho - Thukela 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% South Africa - Thukela 99.7% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Indonesia - Tjeroaka- Wanggoe 62.4% 97.9% 45.0% N.A. Finland - Tuloma 7.9% 0.0% 15.7% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Umba 83.1% 88.1% 12.0% 100.0% Argentina - Valdivia 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Valdivia 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Bulgaria - Velaka 94.4% 95.0% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Velaka 5.6% 5.0% N.A. N.A. Israel - Wadi Al Izziyah 32.2% 26.2% 100.0% 37.2% Lebanon - Wadi Al Izziyah 67.8% 73.8% 0.0% 62.8% China - Yalu 52.9% 58.6% 50.7% 47.1% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-11 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Yalu 47.1% 41.4% 49.3% 52.9% Argentina - Yelcho 62.2% 82.5% 42.0% 100.0% Belgium - Yser 47.5% 53.1% N.A. 0.0% France - Yser 52.5% 46.9% N.A. 100.0% Cameroon - Akpa Brazil - Amazon Canada - Alsek Low Hazard 62.1% 40.1% 73.8% 100.0% 62.4% 31.4% 76.0% 3.6% 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. United States of America - Nigeria - Akpa 37.9% 59.9% 26.2% 0.0% Colombia - Amazon 6.3% 3.5% 11.7% 5.7% Alsek 7.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Aysen 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% N.A. Guyana - Amazon 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Canada - Chilkat 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. United States of America - Chile - Aysen 95.9% 99.9% 100.0% N.A. Peru - Amazon 16.3% 35.1% 6.8% 54.1% Chilkat 50.5% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Brunei - Bangau 54.4% 23.0% N.A. N.A. Venezuela - Amazon 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Canada - Columbia 15.3% 6.1% 31.0% 3.9% United States of America - Malaysia - Bangau 45.6% 77.0% N.A. N.A. Russia - Amur 48.2% 5.3% 72.8% 16.0% Columbia 84.7% 93.9% 69.0% 96.1% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Ireland - Bann 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% France - Bidasoa 12.5% 22.5% N.A. N.A. Congo/Zaire 62.4% 75.4% 66.5% 96.8% United Kingdom - Bann 97.1% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% Spain - Bidasoa 87.5% 77.5% N.A. N.A. Austria - Danube 10.3% 9.4% 26.5% 5.7% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Latvia - Barta 61.8% 39.7% 100.0% N.A. Brazil - Chuy 75.2% 99.4% N.A. N.A. Danube 4.9% 4.7% 10.0% 0.2% Lithuania - Barta 38.2% 60.3% 0.0% N.A. Uruguay - Chuy 24.8% 0.6% N.A. N.A. Germany - Danube 7.5% 11.9% 10.7% 0.8% China - Bei Jiang/Hsi 97.6% 98.9% 97.3% 99.6% Cameroon - Congo/Zaire 2.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% Montenegro - Danube 0.9% 0.3% 3.0% 0.0% Central African Republic - Belize - Belize 61.9% 51.5% 83.5% 100.0% Congo/Zaire 10.9% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% Romania - Danube 29.0% 26.8% 12.2% 63.6% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Guatemala - Belize 38.1% 48.5% 16.5% 0.0% Congo/Zaire 6.7% 2.5% 8.0% 0.0% Slovakia - Danube 5.8% 6.3% 4.4% 7.5% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-12 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Cameroon - Benito/Ntem 42.0% 52.3% 31.2% N.A. Albania - Danube 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Slovenia - Danube 2.2% 2.2% 6.2% 0.3% Equatorial Guinea - Benito/Ntem 34.1% 35.8% 53.9% N.A. Italy - Danube 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Poland - Elbe 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Gabon - Benito/Ntem 23.9% 11.9% 15.0% N.A. Switzerland - Danube 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Canada - Fraser 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 99.4% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ca/Song- United States of America - Koi 35.2% 4.3% 51.0% 9.1% Byelarus - Daugava 48.3% 64.7% 57.1% 100.0% Fraser 0.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% Bangladesh - Ganges- Vietnam - Ca/Song-Koi 64.8% 95.7% 49.0% 90.9% Latvia - Daugava 34.3% 29.8% 29.1% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 6.6% 19.6% 8.0% 9.7% India - Ganges- Ireland - Castletown 16.9% 40.7% 0.0% N.A. Russia - Daugava 16.1% 4.5% 13.8% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 62.3% 75.2% 58.1% 83.4% United Kingdom - Nepal - Ganges- Castletown 83.1% 59.3% 100.0% N.A. Byelarus - Dnieper 24.1% 19.7% 37.2% 2.3% Brahmaputra-Meghna 9.0% 4.6% 11.9% 3.6% Ivory Coast - Cavally 54.6% 71.1% 45.3% 92.2% Russia - Dnieper 17.8% 11.2% 22.8% 1.2% France - Garonne 98.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Liberia - Cavally 41.2% 20.1% 49.1% 7.8% France - Ebro 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% Mekong 20.1% 19.4% 20.0% 16.8% Laos, People's Democratic Liberia - Cestos 84.5% 40.8% 75.7% 100.0% Spain - Ebro 99.2% 97.8% 100.0% 99.7% Republic of - Mekong 25.1% 10.0% 36.4% 12.1% Costa Rica - Changuinola 7.2% 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% Indonesia - Fly 6.7% 0.9% 0.0% N.A. Thailand - Mekong 24.6% 41.3% 16.1% 26.8% Panama - Changuinola 92.8% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% Papua New Guinea - Fly 93.3% 99.1% 100.0% N.A. Vietnam - Mekong 4.8% 18.0% 6.7% 14.8% Bhutan - Ganges- Canada - Nelson- Costa Rica - Chiriqui 3.9% 8.2% 0.0% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% 0.2% Saskatchewan 85.9% 87.6% 87.4% 94.3% Panama - Chiriqui 96.1% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Norway - Glama 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cameroon - Niger 4.2% 4.2% 11.4% 5.6% Argentina - Comau 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Sweden - Glama 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Niger 4.5% 2.3% 14.8% 0.8% Chile - Comau 88.9% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - Great Scarcies 74.7% 59.8% 48.6% 79.1% Nigeria - Niger 26.6% 66.4% 59.8% 15.6% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-13 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Sierra Leone - Great Czech Republic - Gabon - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Scarcies 25.3% 40.2% 51.4% 20.9% Oder/Odra 8.4% 10.9% 6.5% 0.0% Costa Rica - Conventillos 78.5% 90.3% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Grijalva 38.3% 37.7% 43.7% 3.5% Norway - Pasvik 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% N.A. Nicaragua - Conventillos 21.5% 9.7% N.A. N.A. Italy - Isonzo 39.1% 68.5% 46.4% 41.2% Russia - Pasvik 16.5% 50.9% 0.0% N.A. Costa Rica - Corredores/Colorado 95.4% 90.1% 100.0% 100.0% Slovenia - Isonzo 60.9% 31.5% 53.6% 58.8% Italy - Po 94.5% 98.1% 97.9% 99.5% Panama - Corredores/Colorado 4.6% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0% Norway - Klaralven 15.2% 2.4% 18.0% 30.0% Switzerland - Po 5.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% Georgia - Coruh 8.9% 20.5% 11.7% 0.0% Sweden - Klaralven 84.8% 97.6% 82.0% 70.0% Austria - Rhine 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Cameroon - Cross 23.7% 5.6% 36.5% 0.0% Russia - Lava/Pregel 75.3% 84.5% 78.8% 0.0% Switzerland - Rhine 14.1% 11.2% 31.5% 24.6% Nigeria - Cross 76.3% 94.4% 63.5% 100.0% Latvia - Lielupe 66.5% 67.2% 65.9% N.A. France - Rhone 89.6% 85.0% 76.7% 77.9% Russia - Don 87.2% 66.4% 82.6% 50.1% Lithuania - Lielupe 33.5% 32.8% 34.1% N.A. Switzerland - Rhone 10.2% 15.0% 23.3% 22.1% Montenegro - Drin 12.3% 7.4% 0.0% 3.2% Liberia - Mana-Morro 83.4% 77.8% 100.0% N.A. Canada - Skagit 11.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Sierra Leone - Mana- United States of America - Costa Rica - El Naranjo 4.7% 0.3% N.A. N.A. Morro 16.6% 22.2% 0.0% N.A. Skagit 88.3% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% Canada - St. John (North Nicaragua - El Naranjo 95.3% 99.7% N.A. N.A. China - Mekong 21.8% 10.2% 18.6% 26.8% America) 63.5% 82.1% 59.9% 0.0% Ireland - Erne 57.5% 56.6% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - Moa 39.3% 37.5% 39.9% N.A. Canada - St. Lawrence 53.0% 39.4% 55.5% 30.8% United States of America - United Kingdom - Erne 42.5% 43.4% 0.0% N.A. Sierra Leone - Moa 47.6% 55.0% 60.1% N.A. St. Lawrence 47.0% 60.6% 44.5% 69.2% Venezuela - Essequibo 21.9% 12.6% 12.7% 0.0% Finland - Naatamo 41.3% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Canada - Stikine 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. United States of America - Ireland - Fane 86.0% 84.1% N.A. N.A. Norway - Naatamo 58.7% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Stikine 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. United Kingdom - Fane 14.0% 15.9% N.A. N.A. Byelarus - Narva 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% N.A. Canada - Taku 90.2% 57.1% 100.0% N.A. United States of America - Ireland - Flurry 48.2% 68.9% N.A. N.A. Estonia - Narva 33.8% 33.6% 43.0% N.A. Taku 9.8% 42.9% 0.0% N.A. Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-14 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Sweden - United Kingdom - Flurry 51.8% 31.1% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Narva 11.1% 13.9% 15.6% N.A. Torne/Tornealven 67.7% 62.6% 30.5% N.A. Ireland - Foyle 31.6% 20.4% 50.0% N.A. Russia - Narva 53.4% 52.1% 41.4% N.A. Canada - Whiting 76.9% N.A. N.A. N.A. United States of America - United Kingdom - Foyle 68.4% 79.6% 50.0% N.A. Byelarus - Neman 46.4% 44.3% 46.1% 98.4% Whiting 23.1% N.A. N.A. N.A. China - Ganges- Brahmaputra-Meghna 19.7% 0.3% 18.6% 3.0% Lithuania - Neman 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 0.0% Canada - Yukon 39.8% 22.9% 37.0% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Ganges-Brahmaputra- Meghna 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Neman 5.3% 2.9% 6.3% 0.0% Estonia - Gauja 9.6% 2.2% 0.0% N.A. Ethiopia - Nile 11.8% 16.4% 41.4% 2.8% Latvia - Gauja 90.4% 97.8% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Ob 74.3% 76.7% 90.8% 12.4% Malaysia - Golok 43.6% 30.2% N.A. 10.9% Russia - Olanga 89.5% 63.2% 87.4% N.A. Dominican Republic - Thailand - Golok 56.4% 69.8% N.A. 89.1% Pedernales 56.3% 14.3% N.A. 39.2% Belize - Grijalva 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Haiti - Pedernales 43.7% 85.7% N.A. 60.8% China - Irrawaddy 4.6% 4.2% 9.1% 7.7% Italy - Rhine 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% India - Irrawaddy 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 2.7% Indonesia - Sepik 3.3% 1.2% 0.0% N.A. Myanmar (Burma) - Papua New Guinea - Irrawaddy 91.6% 92.7% 88.7% 89.6% Sepik 96.7% 98.8% 100.0% N.A. Norway - Jacobs 68.3% 91.1% 100.0% N.A. Costa Rica - Sixaola 81.5% 74.4% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Jacobs 31.7% 8.9% 0.0% N.A. Panama - Sixaola 18.5% 25.6% 0.0% N.A. Mongolia - Norway - Jenisej/Yenisey 12.8% 23.5% 2.9% 3.2% Torne/Tornealven 3.8% 1.1% 26.3% N.A. Czech Republic - Russia - Jenisej/Yenisey 87.2% 76.5% 97.1% 96.8% Vistula/Wista 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Jurado 70.6% 66.6% N.A. N.A. Russia - Volga 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% Panama - Jurado 29.4% 33.4% N.A. N.A. Finland - Vuoksa 86.4% 98.6% 93.9% 100.0% India - Kaladan 24.2% 20.4% 29.2% 67.1% Russia - Vuoksa 13.6% 1.4% 6.1% 0.0% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-15 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Myanmar (Burma) - Kaladan 75.8% 79.6% 70.8% 32.9% Bangladesh - Karnaphuli 59.0% 86.7% 43.3% 74.9% India - Karnaphuli 40.8% 13.3% 56.7% 25.1% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Krka 12.8% 3.2% N.A. N.A. Croatia - Krka 87.2% 96.8% N.A. N.A. Russia - Lake Ubsa-Nur 24.1% 21.3% 13.4% 36.9% Guinea - Little Scarcies 31.0% 16.7% 30.5% 0.0% Sierra Leone - Little Scarcies 69.0% 83.3% 69.5% 100.0% Guinea - Loffa 11.5% 33.4% 0.0% N.A. Liberia - Loffa 88.5% 66.6% 100.0% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Mbe 7.1% 31.7% 0.0% N.A. Gabon - Mbe 92.9% 68.3% 100.0% N.A. Liberia - Moa 13.1% 7.5% 0.0% N.A. Belize - Moho 76.1% 74.6% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Moho 23.9% 25.4% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Motaqua 88.5% 96.4% 91.3% 100.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Neretva 96.5% 96.9% 100.0% 97.5% Cameroon - Ogooue 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.0% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Ogooue 11.9% 13.8% 10.2% 0.0% Equatorial Guinea - Ogooue 0.9% 4.6% 1.8% 0.0% Gabon - Ogooue 84.9% 78.4% 87.0% 100.0% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-16 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Brazil - Oiapoque/Oyupock 40.2% 74.6% 34.0% N.A. Kazakhstan - Oral/Ural 56.5% 30.3% 47.4% 94.8% Russia - Oral/Ural 43.5% 69.7% 52.6% 5.2% Brazil - Orinoco 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Orinoco 34.7% 16.6% 36.2% 42.5% Venezuela - Orinoco 65.2% 83.4% 63.8% 57.5% Finland - Oulu 93.2% 99.6% 93.1% 100.0% Russia - Oulu 6.8% 0.4% 6.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Pakchan 51.1% 30.5% 47.7% 31.9% Thailand - Pakchan 48.9% 69.5% 52.3% 68.1% Argentina - Palena 45.0% 24.0% 9.3% N.A. Chile - Palena 55.0% 76.0% 90.7% N.A. Brunei - Pandaruan 58.0% 92.2% N.A. N.A. Malaysia - Pandaruan 42.0% 7.8% N.A. N.A. Estonia - Parnu 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Parnu 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Russia - Prohladnaja 77.1% 86.4% N.A. 100.0% Chile - Puelo 34.2% 12.0% 26.7% 0.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Red/Song Hong 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Liechtenstein - Rhine 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% 0.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Saigon 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Saigon 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Salaca 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% N.A. Latvia - Salaca 94.5% 98.6% 100.0% N.A. China - Salween 52.4% 46.6% 45.7% 68.0% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-17 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Myanmar (Burma) - Salween 43.8% 51.1% 46.5% 27.2% Costa Rica - San Juan 30.1% 11.5% 46.0% 30.2% Cameroon - Sanaga 99.0% 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% Nigeria - Sanaga 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 0.0% Belize - Sarstun 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Sarstun 93.4% 99.4% 100.0% N.A. Ivory Coast - Sassandra 87.7% 93.5% 77.4% 100.0% Indonesia - Sembakung 52.9% 18.5% 83.5% 100.0% Malaysia - Sembakung 47.1% 81.5% 16.5% 0.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Song Vam Co Dong 49.2% 38.6% 36.5% 19.2% Vietnam - Song Vam Co Dong 50.8% 61.4% 63.5% 80.8% Guinea - St. John (Africa) 16.9% 21.1% 27.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. John (Africa) 83.0% 78.9% 73.0% 100.0% Liberia - St. Paul 55.5% 44.9% 63.7% 100.0% Indonesia - Tami 97.6% 97.8% 95.6% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tami 2.4% 2.2% 4.4% 0.0% Belize - Temash 85.0% 50.3% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Temash 15.0% 49.7% N.A. N.A. Russia - Terek 95.3% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 37.6% 2.1% 55.0% N.A. Russia - Tuloma 92.1% 100.0% 84.3% N.A. Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-18 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Equatorial Guinea - Utamboni 40.9% 69.9% 43.9% N.A. Gabon - Utamboni 59.1% 30.1% 56.1% N.A. Latvia - Venta 64.9% 34.3% 53.5% N.A. Lithuania - Venta 35.1% 65.7% 46.5% N.A. Denmark - Wiedau 85.0% 88.4% N.A. 100.0% Germany - Wiedau 15.0% 11.6% N.A. 0.0% Chile - Yelcho 37.8% 17.5% 58.0% 0.0% Appendix 5 - CBUs presently at risk A5-19 Figure A5-1. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs with high present variability in runoff. A5-20 Figure A5-2. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs with medium present variability in runoff. A5-21 Figure A5-3. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs with low present variability in runoff. A5-22 Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest climate scenario The data in this appendix are organized by risk levels as diagrammed in Figure 8 of the main text. Country-basin units are listed alphabetically in each category of combined vulnerability and hazard. In addition, the relative importance of the basin in several dimensions appear to the right of each CBU. The percentages listed are the proportions of the basin that the CBU contributes to the basin total for each variable (area from TFDD; population from Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008; runoff from Fekete, Vorosmarty and Grabs 2000; irrigated area from Doll and Siebert 2001). CBUs marked with a "**" had a high present hazard level. CBUs marked with a "*" had a medium present hazard level. CBUs with no asterisks had a low present hazard level. Figures A6-1, A6-2 and A6-3 show the hazard-vulnerability combinations used in the main text. High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guyana - Amacuro* Venezuela - Amazon Mexico - Colorado* High Hazard 13.1% 85.0% 0.0% N.A. 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 1.6% 5.4% 0.0% 14.4% Venezuela - Amacuro* Dominican Republic - 86.9% 15.0% 100.0% N.A. Artibonite* 27.2% 10.0% 45.3% 19.2% Canada - Firth* 59.6% N.A. 0.0% N.A. Iran - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* * 99.8% 99.8% N.A. 100.0% Haiti - Artibonite* 72.8% 90.0% 54.7% 80.8% Gambia, The - Gambia* 8.5% 28.5% 12.5% 68.8% Sudan - Baraka* 37.3% 9.3% N.A. 80.9% Guatemala - Candelaria* 14.5% 3.3% 0.0% N.A. Senegal - Gambia* 72.6% 42.3% 57.8% 4.3% Guyana - Barima* India - Ganges- 52.2% 99.3% 100.0% N.A. Mexico - Candelaria* 85.5% 96.7% 100.0% N.A. Brahmaputra-Meghna 62.3% 75.2% 58.1% 83.4% Venezuela - Barima* Guatemala - Coatan Nepal - Ganges- 47.8% 0.7% 0.0% N.A. Achute* 12.6% 17.4% N.A. 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 9.0% 4.6% 11.9% 3.6% Belize - Belize 61.9% 51.5% 83.5% 100.0% Mexico - Coatan Achute* 87.4% 82.6% N.A. 100.0% Israel - Jordan* 27.0% 4.2% 42.5% 31.3% Guatemala - Belize 38.1% 48.5% 16.5% 0.0% Cameroon - Congo/Zaire 2.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% Jordan - Jordan* 57.1% 83.4% 20.6% 43.2% Ghana - Bia* 58.9% 60.4% 37.4% 0.0% Guinea - Corubal* 72.9% 88.7% 66.2% 0.0% Syria - Jordan* 13.3% 11.5% 10.0% 23.2% Bolivia - Cancoso/Lauca** 85.8% 96.2% 70.0% 100.0% Guinea - Gambia* 18.9% 29.3% 29.7% 26.9% Canada - Mississippi* 1.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Chile - Cancoso/Lauca** 14.2% 3.8% 30.0% 0.0% Guinea - Geba* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Niger 4.5% 2.3% 14.8% 0.8% Ivory Coast - Cavally 54.6% 71.1% 45.3% 92.2% Senegal - Geba* 32.2% 35.1% 20.9% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Niger* 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.1% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-1 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guinea - Cavally* 4.2% 8.8% 5.6% 0.0% Guinea - Great Scarcies 74.7% 59.8% 48.6% 79.1% Mali - Niger* 25.6% 9.6% 5.9% 59.4% Guinea - Cestos* Sierra Leone - Great 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Scarcies 25.3% 40.2% 51.4% 20.9% China - Ob* 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.5% Ivory Coast - Cestos* 15.3% 59.1% 24.3% 0.0% Guatemala - Grijalva 38.3% 37.7% 43.7% 3.5% South Africa - Orange* 59.7% 84.3% 62.5% 60.1% Guatemala - Chamelecon* Mexico - Rio Grande 2.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Grijalva* 61.6% 62.3% 56.3% 96.5% (North America)* 48.2% 75.4% 50.1% 68.5% Honduras - Chamelecon* United States of America - Rio Grande (North 97.2% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Guatemala - Hondo* 29.8% 1.8% 51.5% 0.0% America)* 51.8% 24.6% 49.9% 31.5% Honduras - Coco/Segovia* 24.3% 7.4% 43.4% 7.3% Mexico - Hondo* 57.2% 91.3% 40.7% 97.7% Mali - Senegal* 34.6% 36.5% 49.0% 13.1% Nicaragua - Kyrgyzstan - Ili/Kunes Coco/Segovia* 75.7% 92.6% 56.6% 92.7% He* 5.5% 1.0% 24.5% 5.1% Senegal - Senegal* 8.1% 16.4% 8.3% 22.9% Algeria - Daoura** 47.3% 1.2% N.A. 0.0% Afghanistan - Indus* 6.3% 4.6% 9.6% 1.3% Macedonia - Struma* 11.7% 13.5% 0.0% 16.1% Morocco - Daoura** 52.7% 98.8% N.A. 100.0% Russia - Lava/Pregel 75.3% 84.5% 78.8% 0.0% Mexico - Tijuana* 73.3% 95.8% N.A. 84.0% Morocco - Dra* 78.6% 99.7% 100.0% 96.0% Poland - Lava/Pregel* 24.7% 15.5% 21.2% 100.0% Mozambique - Zambezi* 11.8% 7.6% 6.8% 17.2% Venezuela - Essequibo 21.9% 12.6% 12.7% 0.0% El Salvador - Lempa* 56.5% 85.0% 38.7% 92.4% El Salvador - Goascoran* 47.7% 71.9% 51.1% 0.0% Guatemala - Lempa* 14.0% 7.3% 36.0% 6.9% Honduras - Goascoran* 52.3% 28.1% 48.9% 100.0% Honduras - Lempa* 29.5% 7.7% 25.3% 0.7% Belize - Grijalva Sierra Leone - Mana- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Morro 16.6% 22.2% 0.0% N.A. Algeria - Guir** 77.5% 83.5% N.A. 85.5% Turkey - Maritsa* 25.9% 29.5% 37.9% 21.0% Morocco - Guir** Dominican Republic - 22.5% 16.5% N.A. 14.5% Massacre* 45.7% 23.0% 0.0% 61.1% Belize - Hondo* 13.0% 6.9% 7.8% 2.3% Haiti - Massacre* 54.3% 77.0% 100.0% 38.9% Ghana - Komoe* 2.9% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Neman 5.3% 2.9% 6.3% 0.0% Mali - Komoe* 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Nigeria - Oueme* 16.4% 17.9% 8.7% 10.6% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-2 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Afghanistan - Kowl E Namaksar* 28.8% 6.6% 0.0% 3.0% El Salvador - Paz* 45.8% 71.0% N.A. 76.0% Guinea - Little Scarcies 31.0% 16.7% 30.5% 0.0% Guatemala - Paz* 54.2% 29.0% N.A. 24.0% Sierra Leone - Little Scarcies 69.0% 83.3% 69.5% 100.0% Guinea - Senegal* 7.1% 14.7% 40.7% 1.2% Guinea - Loffa 11.5% 33.4% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Suchiate* 73.5% 65.8% 0.0% 60.0% Algeria - Medjerda* 33.3% 33.0% 22.3% 9.8% Mexico - Suchiate* 26.5% 34.2% 100.0% 40.0% Tunisia - Medjerda* 66.7% 67.0% 77.7% 90.2% Guinea-Bissau - Corubal* 27.1% 11.3% 33.8% 100.0% Belize - Moho 76.1% 74.6% N.A. N.A. Guinea-Bissau - Gambia* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Moho 23.9% 25.4% N.A. N.A. Guinea-Bissau - Geba* 67.4% 64.6% 79.1% 100.0% Guatemala - Motaqua 88.5% 96.4% 91.3% 100.0% Honduras - Motaqua* 11.5% 3.6% 8.7% 0.0% Algeria - Oued Bon Naima** 36.6% 33.8% N.A. 15.2% Morocco - Oued Bon Naima** 63.4% 66.2% N.A. 84.8% Russia - Prohladnaja 77.1% 86.4% N.A. 100.0% Poland - Prohladnaja* 22.9% 13.6% N.A. 0.0% Zimbabwe - Pungwe* 5.7% 7.2% 23.0% 0.0% Costa Rica - San Juan 30.1% 11.5% 46.0% 30.2% Nicaragua - San Juan* 69.9% 88.5% 54.0% 69.8% Cameroon - Sanaga 99.0% 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% Belize - Sarstun 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Sarstun 93.4% 99.4% 100.0% N.A. Ivory Coast - Sassandra 87.7% 93.5% 77.4% 100.0% Guinea - Sassandra* 12.3% 6.5% 22.6% 0.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-3 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guinea - St. John (Africa) 16.9% 21.1% 27.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. John (Africa) 83.0% 78.9% 73.0% 100.0% Guinea - St. Paul* 44.5% 55.1% 36.3% 0.0% Morocco - Tafna** 25.4% 39.1% 0.0% 41.2% Belize - Temash 85.0% 50.3% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Temash 15.0% 49.7% N.A. N.A. Papua New Guinea - Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 37.6% 2.1% 55.0% N.A. Cameroon - Akpa United States of America - Moderate Hazard 62.1% 40.1% 73.8% 100.0% Russia - Amur 48.2% 5.3% 72.8% 16.0% Colorado* 98.4% 94.6% 100.0% 85.6% Nigeria - Akpa Lebanon - An Nahr Al 37.9% 59.9% 26.2% 0.0% Kabir* 32.6% 38.4% 100.0% 60.6% Montenegro - Danube 0.9% 0.3% 3.0% 0.0% Turkey - Asi/Orontes* 49.9% 31.3% 54.7% 46.2% Syria - An Nahr Al Kabir* 67.4% 61.6% 0.0% 39.4% Bulgaria - Danube* 5.2% 4.0% 7.0% 4.7% Azerbaijan - Astara Chay* Czech Republic - 17.4% 27.1% N.A. 0.0% Lebanon - Asi/Orontes* 5.8% 3.1% 3.0% 4.8% Danube* 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 1.0% Eritrea - Baraka* United States of America - 62.7% 90.7% N.A. 19.1% Syria - Asi/Orontes* 44.3% 65.6% 42.3% 49.0% Firth* 40.4% N.A. 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Barta 61.8% 39.7% 100.0% N.A. France - Bidasoa 12.5% 22.5% N.A. N.A. Canada - Fraser 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 99.4% Lithuania - Barta 38.2% 60.3% 0.0% N.A. Spain - Bidasoa 87.5% 77.5% N.A. N.A. Spain - Garonne* 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% China - Bei Jiang/Hsi Central African Republic - 97.6% 98.9% 97.3% 99.6% Congo/Zaire 10.9% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% China - Har Us Nur* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cameroon - Benito/Ntem 42.0% 52.3% 31.2% N.A. Angola - Congo/Zaire* 7.9% 1.9% 7.6% 0.0% Mongolia - Har Us Nur* 96.8% 97.6% 97.9% 100.0% Colombia - Catatumbo* 63.3% 73.0% 62.2% 82.4% Zambia - Congo/Zaire* 4.8% 2.8% 6.0% 0.5% Pakistan - Indus* 52.5% 60.4% 10.1% 60.1% Venezuela - Catatumbo* 36.7% 27.0% 37.8% 17.6% Latvia - Daugava 34.3% 29.8% 29.1% 0.0% Lebanon - Jordan* 2.1% 1.0% 26.9% 2.3% Liberia - Cavally 41.2% 20.1% 49.1% 7.8% Spain - Ebro 99.2% 97.8% 100.0% 99.7% Namibia - Kunene** 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-4 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Liberia - Cestos Bhutan - Ganges- 84.5% 40.8% 75.7% 100.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% 0.2% Brazil - La Plata* 46.7% 70.2% 71.7% 29.5% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Chiloango* 64.7% 92.7% 69.7% N.A. Iran - Helmand* 15.5% 12.5% 0.3% 25.3% Paraguay - La Plata* 13.5% 9.8% 8.7% 24.6% Nicaragua - Choluteca* Kazakhstan - Ili/Kunes Bolivia - Lake Titicaca- 3.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% He* 60.2% 48.0% 64.8% 67.7% Poopo System* 56.4% 49.9% 44.1% 81.6% Georgia - Coruh Central African Republic - Chile - Lake Titicaca- 8.9% 20.5% 11.7% 0.0% Lake Chad* 9.1% 2.8% 24.4% 0.0% Poopo System** 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cameroon - Cross 23.7% 5.6% 36.5% 0.0% Chad - Lake Chad* 45.7% 22.2% 38.0% 32.7% South Africa - Maputo* 60.1% 39.4% 70.1% 36.8% Nigeria - Cross United States of America - 76.3% 94.4% 63.5% 100.0% Greece - Lake Prespa* 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0% Nelson-Saskatchewan* 14.1% 12.4% 12.6% 5.7% Angola - Cuvelai/Etosha* 31.8% 16.1% 76.4% 0.0% Kenya - Lake Turkana* 43.3% 17.7% 20.4% 14.9% Cameroon - Niger 4.2% 4.2% 11.4% 5.6% Iran - Dasht** 21.5% 4.4% N.A. 3.0% Latvia - Lielupe 66.5% 67.2% 65.9% N.A. Nigeria - Niger 26.6% 66.4% 59.8% 15.6% Pakistan - Dasht** 78.5% 95.6% N.A. 97.0% Botswana - Limpopo* 19.6% 8.1% 0.0% 6.0% Chad - Niger* 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% Ukraine - Don* 12.8% 33.6% 17.4% 49.9% Liberia - Mana-Morro 83.4% 77.8% 100.0% N.A. Kenya - Nile* 1.7% 8.3% 6.0% 0.0% Algeria - Dra** 21.4% 0.3% 0.0% 4.0% Bulgaria - Maritsa* 66.5% 67.3% 58.1% 67.2% Rwanda - Nile* 0.7% 4.6% 1.8% 0.1% Montenegro - Drin 12.3% 7.4% 0.0% 3.2% Sierra Leone - Moa 47.6% 55.0% 60.1% N.A. Egypt - Nile** 9.2% 25.6% 0.0% 19.3% Serbia - Drin* 28.8% 46.3% 37.1% 26.1% Lithuania - Neman 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 0.0% Mongolia - Ob** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Elancik* Czech Republic - 73.0% 56.6% N.A. 0.0% Benin - Oueme* 82.9% 81.8% 91.3% 89.4% Oder/Odra 8.4% 10.9% 6.5% 0.0% Bangladesh - Fenney* 34.3% 75.6% 0.0% 47.9% Bulgaria - Rezvaya* 18.4% 2.3% N.A. N.A. Poland - Oder/Odra* 84.2% 84.4% 89.5% 75.4% India - Fenney* 65.7% 24.4% 100.0% 52.1% Turkey - Rezvaya* 81.6% 97.7% N.A. N.A. Namibia - Orange** 25.4% 1.6% 0.0% 35.9% Latvia - Gauja 90.4% 97.8% 100.0% N.A. Kazakhstan - Shu/Chu* 93.0% 27.3% 92.5% 87.0% China - Pu Lun T'o* 87.5% 97.9% 100.0% 98.0% Malaysia - Golok 43.6% 30.2% N.A. 10.9% Kyrgyzstan - Talas* 20.7% 25.1% 68.6% 21.2% Greece - Struma* 26.2% 22.3% 18.7% 31.3% Thailand - Golok Jordan - Tigris- 56.4% 69.8% N.A. 89.1% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Serbia - Struma* 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-5 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Norway - Turkey - Tigris- (North) - Han* 28.7% 4.4% 39.6% 30.9% Torne/Tornealven 3.8% 1.1% 26.3% N.A. Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 24.8% 21.7% 53.3% 14.8% South Korea - Han* 71.3% 95.6% 60.4% 69.1% Greece - Vardar* 12.0% 4.9% 0.0% 19.9% Canada - Yukon 39.8% 22.9% 37.0% 0.0% Russia - Har Us Nur* 3.0% 2.4% 2.1% 0.0% Macedonia - Vardar* 63.5% 52.9% 75.1% 70.1% Malawi - Zambezi* 8.0% 35.2% 6.0% 3.7% China - Indus* 7.5% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% Serbia - Vardar* 24.5% 42.2% 24.9% 10.0% Zambia - Zambezi* 41.6% 27.4% 54.9% 55.0% Norway - Jacobs 68.3% 91.1% 100.0% N.A. Albania - Vijose* 64.5% 93.8% 55.3% 85.5% Zimbabwe - Zambezi* 15.5% 23.7% 8.2% 23.7% Panama - Jurado 29.4% 33.4% N.A. N.A. Greece - Vijose* 35.5% 6.2% 44.7% 14.5% Bangladesh - Karnaphuli Czech Republic - 59.0% 86.7% 43.3% 74.9% Vistula/Wista 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Moldova - Kogilnik* 57.1% 82.1% 89.7% 100.0% Russia - Volga 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% Ukraine - Kogilnik* 42.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Volta** 3.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% Burkina Faso - Komoe* 21.7% 21.3% 20.2% 39.5% Mexico - Yaqui** 94.1% 94.8% 100.0% 97.7% Ivory Coast - Komoe* Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 74.6% 67.6% 79.8% 60.5% Zambezi* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Turkey - Kura-Araks* 14.3% 7.0% 29.8% 12.4% Russia - Lake Ubsa-Nur 24.1% 21.3% 13.4% 36.9% Liberia - Loffa 88.5% 66.6% 100.0% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Mbe 7.1% 31.7% 0.0% N.A. Liberia - Moa 13.1% 7.5% 0.0% N.A. Togo - Mono* 95.0% 85.6% 100.0% 97.7% Turkmenistan - Murgab* 40.2% 33.7% 10.0% 82.0% Syria - Nahr El Kebir* 86.4% 93.5% N.A. 100.0% Turkey - Nahr El Kebir* 13.6% 6.5% N.A. 0.0% Honduras - Negro* 10.7% 24.3% 59.4% 0.5% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-6 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Nicaragua - Negro* 89.3% 75.7% 40.6% 99.5% Bulgaria - Nestos* 53.4% 61.6% 54.9% 31.8% Greece - Nestos* 46.6% 38.4% 45.1% 68.2% Cameroon - Ogooue 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.0% Equatorial Guinea - Ogooue 0.9% 4.6% 1.8% 0.0% French Guiana - Oiapoque/Oyupock* 59.8% 25.4% 66.0% N.A. Venezuela - Orinoco 65.2% 83.4% 63.8% 57.5% Togo - Oueme** 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Oulu 93.2% 99.6% 93.1% 100.0% Mozambique - Pungwe* 94.3% 92.8% 77.0% 100.0% Malawi - Ruvuma* 0.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% Latvia - Salaca 94.5% 98.6% 100.0% N.A. Nigeria - Sanaga 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 0.0% Central African Republic - Sanaga* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Moldova - Sarata* 37.0% 57.2% 100.0% 100.0% Ukraine - Sarata* 63.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. Paul 55.5% 44.9% 63.7% 100.0% Bulgaria - Struma* 58.2% 63.4% 81.3% 52.6% Georgia - Sulak* 7.3% 0.2% 25.6% 0.0% Algeria - Tafna* 74.6% 60.9% 100.0% 58.8% Kyrgyzstan - Tarim* 2.0% 0.1% 39.0% 0.5% Georgia - Terek* 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Indonesia - Tjeroaka- Wanggoe* 62.4% 97.9% 45.0% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Umba* 83.1% 88.1% 12.0% 100.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-7 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Kenya - Umba** 16.9% 11.9% 88.0% 0.0% Bulgaria - Velaka* 94.4% 95.0% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Velaka* 5.6% 5.0% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Venta 64.9% 34.3% 53.5% N.A. Israel - Wadi Al Izziyah* 32.2% 26.2% 100.0% 37.2% Lebanon - Wadi Al Izziyah* 67.8% 73.8% 0.0% 62.8% China - Yalu* 52.9% 58.6% 50.7% 47.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Yalu* 47.1% 41.4% 49.3% 52.9% French Guiana - Amazon* Low Hazard 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Brazil - Amazon 62.4% 31.4% 76.0% 3.6% Canada - Alsek 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Amur* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Amazon 6.3% 3.5% 11.7% 5.7% China - Amur* 42.6% 94.4% 26.6% 83.4% China - Aral Sea* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guyana - Amazon 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Mongolia - Amur* 9.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% Iran - Astara Chay* 82.6% 72.9% N.A. 100.0% Peru - Amazon 16.3% 35.1% 6.8% 54.1% Kazakhstan - Aral Sea* 34.5% 5.2% 8.8% 31.1% Western Sahara - Atui** 35.4% 13.2% N.A. N.A. Bolivia - Amazon* 12.0% 23.8% 4.4% 11.9% Kyrgyzstan - Aral Sea* 9.1% 5.8% 23.4% 4.2% Mauritania - Atui** 64.6% 86.8% N.A. N.A. Ecuador - Amazon* 2.1% 6.1% 0.6% 24.7% Tajikistan - Aral Sea* 11.0% 15.3% 22.4% 10.7% Argentina - Aviles* 88.8% 94.1% N.A. N.A. Suriname - Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Uzbekistan - Aral Sea* 31.1% 58.8% 9.3% 46.4% Chile - Aviles* 11.2% 5.9% N.A. N.A. Afghanistan - Aral Sea* 8.5% 12.1% 34.3% 2.8% Canada - Chilkat 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Ethiopia - Awash* United States of America - 92.7% 99.5% 100.0% 99.7% Turkmenistan - Aral Sea* 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 4.8% Chilkat 50.5% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Djibouti - Awash** 7.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Iran - Atrak* 68.9% 95.0% 97.1% 95.8% Canada - Columbia 15.3% 6.1% 31.0% 3.9% Somalia - Awash** United States of America - 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% Turkmenistan - Atrak* 31.1% 5.0% 2.9% 4.2% Columbia 84.7% 93.9% 69.0% 96.1% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-8 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Argentina - Aysen Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% N.A. Ecuador - Chira** 38.1% 27.4% 59.7% 30.4% Congo/Zaire 62.4% 75.4% 66.5% 96.8% Chile - Aysen 95.9% 99.9% 100.0% N.A. Peru - Chira** 61.9% 72.6% 40.3% 69.6% Austria - Danube 10.3% 9.4% 26.5% 5.7% Pakistan - Congo, Republic of the BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* (Brazzaville) - Bosnia and Herzegovina - 0.2% 0.2% N.A. 0.0% Congo/Zaire 6.7% 2.5% 8.0% 0.0% Danube 4.9% 4.7% 10.0% 0.2% Argentina - Baker* 31.6% 26.9% 26.3% 9.6% Burundi - Congo/Zaire* 0.4% 4.6% 0.2% 0.5% Germany - Danube 7.5% 11.9% 10.7% 0.8% Chile - Baker* 68.4% 73.1% 73.7% 90.4% Rwanda - Congo/Zaire* 0.1% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% Romania - Danube 29.0% 26.8% 12.2% 63.6% Brunei - Bangau Tanzania, United Republic of - 54.4% 23.0% N.A. N.A. Congo/Zaire* 4.5% 5.9% 1.9% 2.0% Slovakia - Danube 5.8% 6.3% 4.4% 7.5% Malaysia - Bangau 45.6% 77.0% N.A. N.A. Argentina - Cullen* 17.1% 9.9% 0.0% N.A. Slovenia - Danube 2.2% 2.2% 6.2% 0.3% United Kingdom - Bann 97.1% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% Chile - Cullen* 82.9% 90.1% 100.0% N.A. Croatia - Danube* 4.5% 3.9% 7.9% 0.0% Ireland - Bann 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Albania - Danube 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hungary - Danube* 11.7% 12.2% 1.9% 7.8% Vietnam - Bei Jiang/Hsi* 2.4% 1.1% 2.7% 0.4% Italy - Danube 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Moldova - Danube* 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 2.5% China - Beilun* 84.0% 69.2% 100.0% 95.8% Switzerland - Danube 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Poland - Danube* 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Vietnam - Beilun* 16.0% 30.8% 0.0% 4.2% Byelarus - Daugava 48.3% 64.7% 57.1% 100.0% Serbia - Danube* 9.4% 10.0% 4.7% 1.0% Gabon - Benito/Ntem 23.9% 11.9% 15.0% N.A. Russia - Daugava 16.1% 4.5% 13.8% 0.0% Ukraine - Danube* 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 4.9% Equatorial Guinea - Benito/Ntem 34.1% 35.8% 53.9% N.A. Lithuania - Daugava* 1.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Douro/Duero* 18.2% 50.4% 38.3% 22.1% Ivory Coast - Bia* 41.1% 39.6% 62.6% 100.0% Byelarus - Dnieper 24.1% 19.7% 37.2% 2.3% Spain - Douro/Duero* 81.8% 49.6% 61.7% 77.9% Mozambique - Buzi* 88.7% 76.3% 86.3% 52.2% Russia - Dnieper 17.8% 11.2% 22.8% 1.2% Poland - Elbe 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Buzi* 11.3% 23.7% 13.7% 47.8% Ukraine - Dnieper* 58.0% 69.1% 40.1% 96.5% Czech Republic - Elbe* 36.1% 25.9% 38.4% 37.5% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ca/Song- Koi 35.2% 4.3% 51.0% 9.1% Moldova - Dniester* 24.6% 36.6% 2.2% 56.4% Germany - Elbe* 62.7% 73.2% 61.6% 62.5% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-9 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Vietnam - Ca/Song-Koi United States of America - 64.8% 95.7% 49.0% 90.9% Poland - Dniester* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Fraser 0.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% Argentina - Carmen Bangladesh - Ganges- Silva/Chico* 59.2% 97.2% 100.0% N.A. Ukraine - Dniester* 75.3% 63.4% 97.8% 43.6% Brahmaputra-Meghna 6.6% 19.6% 8.0% 9.7% Chile - Carmen Silva/Chico* 40.8% 2.8% 0.0% N.A. Albania - Drin* 45.6% 37.5% 56.5% 60.2% France - Garonne 98.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% United Kingdom - Castletown 83.1% 59.3% 100.0% N.A. Macedonia - Drin* 13.2% 8.8% 6.4% 10.5% Portugal - Guadiana* 18.9% 17.4% 38.8% 11.8% Ireland - Castletown 16.9% 40.7% 0.0% N.A. France - Ebro 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% Spain - Guadiana* 81.1% 82.6% 61.2% 88.2% Costa Rica - Changuinola 7.2% 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% Indonesia - Fly 6.7% 0.9% 0.0% N.A. South Africa - Incomati* 62.3% 73.5% 100.0% 57.8% Panama - Changuinola 92.8% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% Papua New Guinea - Fly 93.3% 99.1% 100.0% N.A. Swaziland - Incomati* 6.3% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0% Angola - Chiloango* 32.5% 5.7% 30.3% N.A. Eritrea - Gash** 53.6% 44.8% 58.0% 10.0% Mozambique - Incomati** 31.3% 18.1% 0.0% 36.2% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Chiloango* 2.8% 1.5% 0.0% N.A. Sudan - Gash** 23.9% 25.2% 0.0% 85.0% India - Indus* 33.7% 35.0% 61.3% 38.6% Panama - Chiriqui 96.1% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Norway - Glama 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Angola - Kunene* 86.7% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% Honduras - Choluteca* 96.6% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Sweden - Glama 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Argentina - La Plata* 27.7% 16.5% 11.2% 40.8% Argentina - Comau 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Afghanistan - Helmand* 81.5% 85.8% 98.3% 74.3% Uruguay - La Plata* 3.8% 1.1% 5.5% 2.8% Chile - Comau 88.9% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. China - Ili/Kunes He* 34.3% 51.0% 10.7% 27.2% Brazil - Lagoon Mirim* 43.2% 53.8% 43.9% 65.8% Gabon - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Italy - Isonzo 39.1% 68.5% 46.4% 41.2% Uruguay - Lagoon Mirim* 56.8% 46.2% 56.1% 34.2% Malawi - Congo/Zaire* Peru - Lake Titicaca- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Slovenia - Isonzo 60.9% 31.5% 53.6% 58.8% Poopo System* 42.9% 50.1% 55.9% 18.4% Sudan - Congo/Zaire* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Egypt - Jordan** 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Lima* 48.2% 66.5% 100.0% 74.7% Uganda - Congo/Zaire** 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Ethiopia - Juba-Shibeli* 45.7% 66.5% 66.8% 48.1% Spain - Lima* 51.8% 33.5% 0.0% 25.3% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-10 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Brazil - Corantijn/Courantyne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Kenya - Juba-Shibeli* 26.8% 14.0% 31.5% 3.9% Mozambique - Limpopo* 21.0% 7.5% 0.0% 47.9% Guyana - Corantijn/Courantyne* 52.0% 40.1% 38.9% N.A. Somalia - Juba-Shibeli** 27.5% 19.6% 1.6% 48.1% South Africa - Limpopo* 44.3% 78.8% 91.3% 38.7% Suriname - Corantijn/Courantyne* 47.9% 59.9% 61.1% N.A. Finland - Kemi* 94.4% 96.9% 96.3% N.A. Mozambique - Maputo* 5.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% Costa Rica - Corredores/Colorado 95.4% 90.1% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Kemi* 5.6% 3.1% 3.7% N.A. Swaziland - Maputo* 34.9% 59.7% 29.9% 62.4% Turkey - Coruh* Cambodia (Kampuchea) - 91.1% 79.5% 88.3% 100.0% Norway - Klaralven 15.2% 2.4% 18.0% 30.0% Mekong 20.1% 19.4% 20.0% 16.8% Namibia - Cuvelai/Etosha* Laos, People's Democratic 68.2% 83.9% 23.6% 100.0% Sweden - Klaralven 84.8% 97.6% 82.0% 70.0% Republic of - Mekong 25.1% 10.0% 36.4% 12.1% Russia - Don 87.2% 66.4% 82.6% 50.1% Armenia - Kura-Araks* 15.3% 22.9% 7.7% 9.0% Thailand - Mekong 24.6% 41.3% 16.1% 26.8% Andorra - Ebro* 0.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% Azerbaijan - Kura-Araks* 32.0% 34.6% 12.2% 40.2% Vietnam - Mekong 4.8% 18.0% 6.7% 14.8% Ukraine - Elancik* 27.0% 43.4% N.A. 100.0% Iran - Kura-Araks* 20.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% Portugal - Mino* 4.2% 5.6% 0.0% 13.3% Austria - Elbe* 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Bolivia - La Plata* 8.3% 2.3% 2.9% 2.4% Spain - Mino* 95.8% 94.4% 100.0% 86.7% United Kingdom - Erne United States of America - 42.5% 43.4% 0.0% N.A. Cameroon - Lake Chad* 2.0% 6.1% 12.9% 12.7% Mississippi* 98.4% 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Ireland - Erne Canada - Nelson- 57.5% 56.6% 100.0% N.A. Nigeria - Lake Chad* 7.5% 56.5% 19.5% 26.3% Saskatchewan 85.9% 87.6% 87.4% 94.3% Brazil - Essequibo* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Niger - Lake Chad** 28.2% 5.7% 0.4% 23.8% Benin - Niger* 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% 0.6% Guyana - Essequibo* 67.9% 83.1% 81.2% 66.8% Albania - Lake Prespa* 88.1% 97.9% 100.0% 94.3% Burkina Faso - Niger* 3.9% 3.0% 1.0% 0.7% Suriname - Essequibo* 10.1% 4.3% 6.1% 33.2% Macedonia - Lake Prespa* 8.6% 1.8% 0.0% 4.7% Niger - Niger** 23.6% 11.6% 0.8% 17.2% United Kingdom - Fane 14.0% 15.9% N.A. N.A. Ethiopia - Lake Turkana* 54.8% 81.9% 79.4% 85.1% Burundi - Nile* 0.4% 2.8% 0.8% 0.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-11 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Ireland - Fane 86.0% 84.1% N.A. N.A. Uganda - Lake Turkana* 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Sudan - Nile* 63.6% 18.9% 38.2% 77.4% United Kingdom - Flurry Tanzania, United 51.8% 31.1% N.A. N.A. Lithuania - Lielupe 33.5% 32.8% 34.1% N.A. Republic of - Nile* 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% 0.0% Ireland - Flurry 48.2% 68.9% N.A. N.A. Zimbabwe - Limpopo** 15.1% 5.5% 8.7% 7.4% Uganda - Nile* 7.9% 17.1% 6.9% 0.4% United Kingdom - Foyle 68.4% 79.6% 50.0% N.A. French Guiana - Maroni* 41.8% 54.7% 34.9% 100.0% Germany - Oder/Odra* 6.2% 4.1% 4.0% 24.3% Ireland - Foyle 31.6% 20.4% 50.0% N.A. Suriname - Maroni* 58.0% 45.3% 65.1% 0.0% Slovakia - Oder/Odra* 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% Argentina - Gallegos/Chico* 60.7% 81.9% 0.0% N.A. China - Mekong 21.8% 10.2% 18.6% 26.8% Angola - Okavango* 21.2% 34.1% 92.0% 63.1% Chile - Gallegos/Chico* Myanmar (Burma) - 39.3% 18.1% 100.0% N.A. Mekong* 3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 2.8% Namibia - Okavango* 24.9% 21.8% 0.7% 27.0% China - Ganges- Brahmaputra-Meghna 19.7% 0.3% 18.6% 3.0% Guinea - Moa 39.3% 37.5% 39.9% N.A. Botswana - Okavango** 50.7% 30.2% 7.1% 9.9% Myanmar (Burma) - Ganges-Brahmaputra- Meghna 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Naatamo 41.3% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Lesotho - Orange* 2.1% 12.8% 37.5% 0.7% Andorra - Garonne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Norway - Naatamo 58.7% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Botswana - Orange** 12.9% 1.3% 0.0% 3.3% Ethiopia - Gash** 22.5% 30.0% 42.0% 5.0% Byelarus - Narva 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Pasvik 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% N.A. Estonia - Gauja 9.6% 2.2% 0.0% N.A. Estonia - Narva 33.8% 33.6% 43.0% N.A. Russia - Pasvik 16.5% 50.9% 0.0% N.A. Afghanistan - Hari/Harirud* 44.3% 37.5% 68.3% 14.4% Latvia - Narva 11.1% 13.9% 15.6% N.A. Finland - Pasvik* 77.2% 41.6% 100.0% N.A. Iran - Hari/Harirud* 38.3% 56.4% 31.7% 63.9% Russia - Narva 53.4% 52.1% 41.4% N.A. Italy - Po 94.5% 98.1% 97.9% 99.5% Turkmenistan - Hari/Harirud* 17.4% 6.2% 0.0% 21.7% Byelarus - Neman 46.4% 44.3% 46.1% 98.4% Switzerland - Po 5.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% Pakistan - Helmand* 3.0% 1.7% 1.4% 0.4% Latvia - Neman* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Mongolia - Pu Lun T'o* 12.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% China - Irrawaddy 4.6% 4.2% 9.1% 7.7% Poland - Neman* 4.2% 3.6% 5.2% 1.6% Austria - Rhine 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% India - Irrawaddy 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 2.7% Ethiopia - Nile 11.8% 16.4% 41.4% 2.8% Switzerland - Rhine 14.1% 11.2% 31.5% 24.6% Myanmar (Burma) - Central African Republic - Irrawaddy 91.6% 92.7% 88.7% 89.6% Nile* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Belgium - Rhine* 8.0% 5.3% 6.0% 5.1% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-12 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Russia - Jacobs Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 31.7% 8.9% 0.0% N.A. Nile* 0.7% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% France - Rhine* 13.3% 7.3% 11.7% 8.3% Mongolia - Jenisej/Yenisey 12.8% 23.5% 2.9% 3.2% Eritrea - Nile** 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Germany - Rhine* 56.6% 66.1% 41.4% 36.5% Russia - Jenisej/Yenisey 87.2% 76.5% 97.1% 96.8% Russia - Ob 74.3% 76.7% 90.8% 12.4% Luxembourg - Rhine* 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% India - Kaladan 24.2% 20.4% 29.2% 67.1% Kazakhstan - Ob* 25.2% 22.8% 9.2% 86.1% Netherlands - Rhine* 5.7% 8.6% 2.1% 25.5% Myanmar (Burma) - Kaladan 75.8% 79.6% 70.8% 32.9% Russia - Olanga 89.5% 63.2% 87.4% N.A. France - Rhone 89.6% 85.0% 76.7% 77.9% India - Karnaphuli 40.8% 13.3% 56.7% 25.1% Finland - Olanga* 10.5% 36.8% 12.6% N.A. Switzerland - Rhone 10.2% 15.0% 23.3% 22.1% Iran - Kowl E Namaksar* 71.2% 93.4% 100.0% 97.0% France - Po* 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mauritania - Senegal** 50.3% 32.4% 2.0% 62.8% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Krka 12.8% 3.2% N.A. N.A. Italy - Rhine 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Canada - Skagit 11.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Croatia - Krka United States of America - 87.2% 96.8% N.A. N.A. France - Roia* 67.2% 34.2% N.A. 14.3% Skagit 88.3% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% Georgia - Kura-Araks* 17.7% 19.0% 33.5% 22.3% Italy - Roia* 32.8% 65.8% N.A. 85.7% Canada - St. Croix* 35.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% Algeria - Lake Chad** United States of America - 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mozambique - Ruvuma* 65.2% 26.4% 71.8% 75.6% St. Croix* 64.9% 48.6% 100.0% 100.0% Libya - Lake Chad** Tanzania, United Canada - St. John (North 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Republic of - Ruvuma* 34.5% 70.8% 28.2% 24.4% America) 63.5% 82.1% 59.9% 0.0% Sudan - Lake Chad** United States of America - 3.5% 6.7% 4.8% 4.5% Belgium - Schelde* 49.3% 56.5% 55.9% 36.8% St. John (North America)* 36.5% 17.9% 40.1% 100.0% Argentina - Lake Fagnano* 85.0% 100.0% N.A. N.A. France - Schelde* 50.2% 43.4% 44.1% 62.5% Canada - St. Lawrence 53.0% 39.4% 55.5% 30.8% Chile - Lake Fagnano* United States of America - 15.0% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Netherlands - Schelde* 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% St. Lawrence 47.0% 60.6% 44.5% 69.2% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-13 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Kenya - Lake Natron* 33.0% 39.8% 27.0% 0.0% Belgium - Seine* 2.2% 0.8% 7.0% 0.8% Canada - Stikine 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Lake United States of America - Natron* 67.0% 60.2% 73.0% 100.0% France - Seine* 97.7% 99.0% 93.0% 99.2% Stikine 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Sudan - Lake Turkana** 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Luxembourg - Seine* 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Tagus/Tejo* 33.5% 33.9% 55.4% 42.1% Mongolia - Lake Ubsa- Nur* 75.9% 78.7% 86.6% 63.1% Indonesia - Sepik 3.3% 1.2% 0.0% N.A. Spain - Tagus/Tejo* 66.5% 66.1% 44.6% 57.9% Indonesia - Loes* Papua New Guinea - 16.3% 6.6% N.A. 0.0% Sepik 96.7% 98.8% 100.0% N.A. Canada - Taku 90.2% 57.1% 100.0% N.A. Timor Leste - Loes* United States of America - 83.7% 93.4% N.A. 100.0% Kyrgyzstan - Shu/Chu* 7.0% 72.7% 7.5% 13.0% Taku 9.8% 42.9% 0.0% N.A. Ethiopia - Lotagipi Swamp** Iraq - Tigris- 8.4% 7.3% 40.3% N.A. Costa Rica - Sixaola 81.5% 74.4% 100.0% N.A. Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 40.5% 45.0% 19.1% 55.2% Kenya - Lotagipi United States of America - Swamp** 52.4% 63.5% 29.4% N.A. Panama - Sixaola 18.5% 25.6% 0.0% N.A. Tijuana* 26.7% 4.2% N.A. 16.0% Sudan - Lotagipi Sweden - Swamp** 34.1% 18.9% 30.2% N.A. Kazakhstan - Talas* 79.3% 74.9% 31.4% 78.8% Torne/Tornealven 67.7% 62.6% 30.5% N.A. Uganda - Lotagipi Swamp** 5.1% 10.2% 0.0% N.A. Finland - Tana* 41.1% 37.1% 83.8% N.A. Mozambique - Umbeluzi* 67.3% 92.6% 4.0% 20.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ma* 43.8% 11.5% 44.2% 16.0% Norway - Tana* 58.9% 62.9% 16.2% N.A. Swaziland - Umbeluzi* 32.5% 7.4% 96.0% 80.0% Vietnam - Ma* Iran - Tigris- South Africa - 56.2% 88.5% 55.8% 84.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 19.7% 17.1% 26.2% 12.9% Umbeluzi** 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Greece - Maritsa* Syria - Tigris- 7.6% 3.1% 4.0% 11.8% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 14.7% 16.2% 1.4% 17.1% Ukraine - Vistula/Wista* 6.7% 7.9% 4.8% 0.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-14 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Brazil - Maroni* Finland - 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Torne/Tornealven* 28.6% 36.4% 43.2% N.A. Canada - Whiting 76.9% N.A. N.A. N.A. Colombia - Mataje* United States of America - 28.6% 43.5% N.A. 0.0% Ecuador - Tumbes** 71.1% 74.3% 100.0% 82.3% Whiting 23.1% N.A. N.A. N.A. Ecuador - Mataje* United States of America - 71.4% 56.5% N.A. 100.0% Peru - Tumbes** 28.9% 25.7% 0.0% 17.7% Yukon* 60.2% 77.1% 63.0% 100.0% Gabon - Mbe 92.9% 68.3% 100.0% N.A. China - Tumen* 69.7% 70.3% 50.1% 67.6% Angola - Zambezi* 18.4% 1.1% 22.1% 0.0% Colombia - Mira* Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Tanzania, United 51.8% 38.7% 85.5% 1.3% (North) - Tumen* 28.6% 29.6% 49.9% 32.4% Republic of - Zambezi* 2.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.2% Ecuador - Mira* 48.2% 61.3% 14.5% 98.7% Russia - Tumen* 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Botswana - Zambezi** 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Russia - Mius* 70.4% 75.8% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Vistula/Wista* 5.1% 2.4% 2.9% 8.8% Namibia - Zambezi** 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Ukraine - Mius* 29.6% 24.2% 100.0% 100.0% Poland - Vistula/Wista* 87.2% 88.9% 89.2% 90.9% Ecuador - Zarumilla** 78.7% 71.4% N.A. 88.4% Benin - Mono* 5.0% 14.4% 0.0% 2.3% Slovakia - Vistula/Wista* 1.0% 0.9% 3.1% 0.3% Peru - Zarumilla** 21.3% 28.6% N.A. 11.6% Afghanistan - Murgab* 59.8% 66.3% 90.0% 18.0% Byelarus - Volga* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Neretva 96.5% 96.9% 100.0% 97.5% Kazakhstan - Volga* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Croatia - Neretva* 3.5% 3.1% 0.0% 2.5% Benin - Volta* 3.6% 2.7% 5.3% 2.9% Algeria - Niger** 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Burkina Faso - Volta* 42.1% 48.4% 24.6% 30.1% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Nyanga* 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% N.A. Ghana - Volta* 40.2% 37.0% 47.3% 60.6% Gabon - Nyanga* 93.4% 97.3% 100.0% N.A. Mali - Volta* 4.6% 2.7% 1.0% 0.9% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Ogooue 11.9% 13.8% 10.2% 0.0% Togo - Volta* 6.3% 7.9% 20.1% 3.9% Gabon - Ogooue 84.9% 78.4% 87.0% 100.0% Finland - Vuoksa 86.4% 98.6% 93.9% 100.0% Brazil - Oiapoque/Oyupock 40.2% 74.6% 34.0% N.A. Russia - Vuoksa 13.6% 1.4% 6.1% 0.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-15 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Zimbabwe - Okavango* United States of America - 3.2% 13.9% 0.3% 0.0% Yaqui** 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.3% Kazakhstan - Oral/Ural 56.5% 30.3% 47.4% 94.8% Russia - Oral/Ural 43.5% 69.7% 52.6% 5.2% Brazil - Orinoco 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Orinoco 34.7% 16.6% 36.2% 42.5% Russia - Oulu 6.8% 0.4% 6.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Pakchan 51.1% 30.5% 47.7% 31.9% Thailand - Pakchan 48.9% 69.5% 52.3% 68.1% Argentina - Palena 45.0% 24.0% 9.3% N.A. Chile - Palena 55.0% 76.0% 90.7% N.A. Brunei - Pandaruan 58.0% 92.2% N.A. N.A. Malaysia - Pandaruan 42.0% 7.8% N.A. N.A. Kenya - Pangani* 2.6% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Tanzania, United Republic of - Pangani* 97.4% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Parnu 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Parnu 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Pascua* 46.1% 36.0% 41.5% N.A. Chile - Pascua* 53.9% 64.0% 58.5% N.A. Colombia - Patia* 97.6% 90.9% 100.0% 78.9% Ecuador - Patia* 2.4% 9.1% 0.0% 21.1% Russia - Pu Lun T'o* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Puelo 34.2% 12.0% 26.7% 0.0% Argentina - Puelo* 65.8% 88.0% 73.3% 100.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Red/Song Hong 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-16 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area China - Red/Song Hong* 53.7% 38.4% 42.7% 55.3% Vietnam - Red/Song Hong* 45.6% 61.6% 57.3% 44.7% Liechtenstein - Rhine 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% 0.0% Argentina - Rio Grande (South America)* 49.6% 85.1% 30.4% N.A. Chile - Rio Grande (South America)* 50.4% 14.9% 69.6% N.A. Mozambique - Sabi* 26.1% 7.6% 9.3% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Sabi* 73.9% 92.4% 90.7% 100.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Saigon 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Saigon 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Salaca 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% N.A. China - Salween 52.4% 46.6% 45.7% 68.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Salween 43.8% 51.1% 46.5% 27.2% Thailand - Salween* 3.7% 2.3% 7.8% 4.8% Azerbaijan - Samur* 6.5% 2.5% 0.0% 14.2% Russia - Samur* 93.5% 97.5% 100.0% 85.8% Argentina - San Martin* 12.2% 57.9% N.A. N.A. Chile - San Martin* 87.8% 42.1% N.A. N.A. Indonesia - Sembakung 52.9% 18.5% 83.5% 100.0% Malaysia - Sembakung 47.1% 81.5% 16.5% 0.0% Argentina - Seno Union/Serrano* 10.3% 1.1% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Seno Union/Serrano* 89.7% 98.9% 100.0% N.A. Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-17 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Song Vam Co Dong 49.2% 38.6% 36.5% 19.2% Vietnam - Song Vam Co Dong 50.8% 61.4% 63.5% 80.8% China - Sujfun* 64.7% 60.0% 64.3% 60.2% Russia - Sujfun* 35.3% 40.0% 35.7% 39.8% Azerbaijan - Sulak* 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Sulak* 92.4% 99.7% 74.4% 100.0% Indonesia - Tami 97.6% 97.8% 95.6% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tami 2.4% 2.2% 4.4% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Tano* 10.9% 5.9% 31.5% 100.0% Ghana - Tano* 89.1% 94.1% 68.5% 0.0% Afghanistan - Tarim* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Tarim* 97.2% 99.8% 58.4% 99.5% Tajikistan - Tarim* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Tarim** 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% Russia - Terek 95.3% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% Lesotho - Thukela* 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% South Africa - Thukela* 99.7% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Saudi Arabia - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Tuloma 92.1% 100.0% 84.3% N.A. Finland - Tuloma* 7.9% 0.0% 15.7% N.A. Gabon - Utamboni 59.1% 30.1% 56.1% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Utamboni 40.9% 69.9% 43.9% N.A. Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-18 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Argentina - Valdivia* 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Valdivia* 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Lithuania - Venta 35.1% 65.7% 46.5% N.A. Germany - Wiedau 15.0% 11.6% N.A. 0.0% Denmark - Wiedau 85.0% 88.4% N.A. 100.0% Chile - Yelcho 37.8% 17.5% 58.0% 0.0% Argentina - Yelcho* 62.2% 82.5% 42.0% 100.0% Belgium - Yser* 47.5% 53.1% N.A. 0.0% France - Yser* 52.5% 46.9% N.A. 100.0% Argentina - Zapaleri** 19.8% 2.4% 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Zapaleri** 21.7% 19.5% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Zapaleri** 58.5% 78.1% 0.0% N.A. Appendix 6 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Driest scenario Page A6-19 Figure A6-1. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience high increases in runoff variability for 2030. A6-20 Figure A6-2. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience moderate increases in runoff variability for 2030. A6-21 Figure A6-3. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience little or no increase in runoff variability for 2030. A6-22 Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario The data in this appendix are organized by risk levels as diagrammed in Figure 8 of the main text. Country-basin units are listed alphabetically in each category of combined vulnerability and hazard. In addition, the relative importance of the basin in several dimensions appear to the right of each CBU. The percentages listed are the proportions of the basin that the CBU contributes to the basin total for each variable (area from TFDD; population from Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008; runoff from Fekete, Vorosmarty and Grabs 2000; irrigated area from Doll and Siebert 2001). CBUs marked with a "**" had a high present hazard level. CBUs marked with a "*" had a medium present hazard level. CBUs with no asterisks had a low present hazard level. Figures A7-1, A7-2 and A7-3 show the hazard-vulnerability combinations used in the main text. High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guyana - Amacuro* Venezuela - Amazon Mongolia - Amur* High Hazard 13.1% 85.0% 0.0% N.A. 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 9.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% Venezuela - Amacuro* Lebanon - An Nahr Al 86.9% 15.0% 100.0% N.A. Kabir* 32.6% 38.4% 100.0% 60.6% Mexico - Colorado* 1.6% 5.4% 0.0% 14.4% Azerbaijan - Astara Chay* Syria - An Nahr Al United States of America - 17.4% 27.1% N.A. 0.0% Kabir* 67.4% 61.6% 0.0% 39.4% Colorado* 98.4% 94.6% 100.0% 85.6% Djibouti - Awash** 7.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Lebanon - Asi/Orontes* 5.8% 3.1% 3.0% 4.8% Canada - Firth* 59.6% N.A. 0.0% N.A. Pakistan - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* United States of America - 0.2% 0.2% N.A. 0.0% Syria - Asi/Orontes* 44.3% 65.6% 42.3% 49.0% Firth* 40.4% N.A. 100.0% N.A. Iran - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* * 99.8% 99.8% N.A. 100.0% Cameroon - Congo/Zaire 2.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% Gambia, The - Gambia* 8.5% 28.5% 12.5% 68.8% Sudan - Baraka* Central African Republic 37.3% 9.3% N.A. 80.9% - Congo/Zaire 10.9% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% Senegal - Gambia* 72.6% 42.3% 57.8% 4.3% Guyana - Barima* Nepal - Ganges- 52.2% 99.3% 100.0% N.A. Angola - Congo/Zaire* 7.9% 1.9% 7.6% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 9.0% 4.6% 11.9% 3.6% Venezuela - Barima* 47.8% 0.7% 0.0% N.A. Zambia - Congo/Zaire* 4.8% 2.8% 6.0% 0.5% Israel - Jordan* 27.0% 4.2% 42.5% 31.3% China - Bei Jiang/Hsi 97.6% 98.9% 97.3% 99.6% Guinea - Corubal* 72.9% 88.7% 66.2% 0.0% Jordan - Jordan* 57.1% 83.4% 20.6% 43.2% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-1 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area China - Beilun* 84.0% 69.2% 100.0% 95.8% Guinea - Gambia* 18.9% 29.3% 29.7% 26.9% Lebanon - Jordan* 2.1% 1.0% 26.9% 2.3% Vietnam - Beilun* 16.0% 30.8% 0.0% 4.2% Guinea - Geba* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Syria - Jordan* 13.3% 11.5% 10.0% 23.2% Belize - Belize 61.9% 51.5% 83.5% 100.0% Senegal - Geba* 32.2% 35.1% 20.9% 0.0% Brazil - La Plata* 46.7% 70.2% 71.7% 29.5% Guatemala - Belize 38.1% 48.5% 16.5% 0.0% Guinea - Great Scarcies 74.7% 59.8% 48.6% 79.1% Paraguay - La Plata* 13.5% 9.8% 8.7% 24.6% Ghana - Bia* Sierra Leone - Great 58.9% 60.4% 37.4% 0.0% Scarcies 25.3% 40.2% 51.4% 20.9% Uruguay - Lagoon Mirim* 56.8% 46.2% 56.1% 34.2% Bolivia - Bolivia - Lake Titicaca- Cancoso/Lauca** 85.8% 96.2% 70.0% 100.0% Afghanistan - Helmand* 81.5% 85.8% 98.3% 74.3% Poopo System* 56.4% 49.9% 44.1% 81.6% Chile - Cancoso/Lauca** Chile - Lake Titicaca- 14.2% 3.8% 30.0% 0.0% Iran - Helmand* 15.5% 12.5% 0.3% 25.3% Poopo System** 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Catatumbo* 63.3% 73.0% 62.2% 82.4% Mexico - Hondo* 57.2% 91.3% 40.7% 97.7% South Africa - Maputo* 60.1% 39.4% 70.1% 36.8% Venezuela - Catatumbo* 36.7% 27.0% 37.8% 17.6% Somalia - Juba-Shibeli** 27.5% 19.6% 1.6% 48.1% Swaziland - Maputo* 34.9% 59.7% 29.9% 62.4% Guinea - Cavally* Cambodia (Kampuchea) - 4.2% 8.8% 5.6% 0.0% Latvia - Lielupe 66.5% 67.2% 65.9% N.A. Mekong 20.1% 19.4% 20.0% 16.8% Guinea - Cestos* 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Lithuania - Lielupe 33.5% 32.8% 34.1% N.A. Canada - Mississippi* 1.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Ivory Coast - Cestos* 15.3% 59.1% 24.3% 0.0% Botswana - Limpopo* 19.6% 8.1% 0.0% 6.0% Guinea - Niger 4.5% 2.3% 14.8% 0.8% Guatemala - Chamelecon* 2.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Liberia - Mana-Morro 83.4% 77.8% 100.0% N.A. Ivory Coast - Niger* 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.1% Honduras - Chamelecon* Sierra Leone - Mana- 97.2% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Morro 16.6% 22.2% 0.0% N.A. Mali - Niger* 25.6% 9.6% 5.9% 59.4% Angola - Chiloango* 32.5% 5.7% 30.3% N.A. Guinea - Moa 39.3% 37.5% 39.9% N.A. China - Ob* 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.5% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Chiloango* 64.7% 92.7% 69.7% N.A. Sierra Leone - Moa 47.6% 55.0% 60.1% N.A. Poland - Oder/Odra* 84.2% 84.4% 89.5% 75.4% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Chiloango* 2.8% 1.5% 0.0% N.A. Lithuania - Neman 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 0.0% Angola - Okavango* 21.2% 34.1% 92.0% 63.1% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-2 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Honduras - Coco/Segovia* 24.3% 7.4% 43.4% 7.3% Russia - Neman 5.3% 2.9% 6.3% 0.0% Namibia - Orange** 25.4% 1.6% 0.0% 35.9% Nicaragua - Coco/Segovia* 75.7% 92.6% 56.6% 92.7% Poland - Neman* 4.2% 3.6% 5.2% 1.6% Mongolia - Pu Lun T'o* 12.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% Algeria - Daoura** 47.3% 1.2% N.A. 0.0% Benin - Oueme* 82.9% 81.8% 91.3% 89.4% Mali - Senegal* 34.6% 36.5% 49.0% 13.1% Morocco - Daoura** 52.7% 98.8% N.A. 100.0% Nigeria - Oueme* 16.4% 17.9% 8.7% 10.6% Senegal - Senegal* 8.1% 16.4% 8.3% 22.9% Iran - Dasht** 21.5% 4.4% N.A. 3.0% Guatemala - Paz* 54.2% 29.0% N.A. 24.0% Swaziland - Umbeluzi* 32.5% 7.4% 96.0% 80.0% Morocco - Dra* 78.6% 99.7% 100.0% 96.0% Guinea - Senegal* 7.1% 14.7% 40.7% 1.2% Angola - Zambezi* 18.4% 1.1% 22.1% 0.0% Venezuela - Essequibo Byelarus - 21.9% 12.6% 12.7% 0.0% Vistula/Wista* 5.1% 2.4% 2.9% 8.8% Zambia - Zambezi* 41.6% 27.4% 54.9% 55.0% Belize - Grijalva 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Poland - Vistula/Wista* 87.2% 88.9% 89.2% 90.9% Algeria - Guir** Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 77.5% 83.5% N.A. 85.5% Zambezi* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Morocco - Guir** Guinea-Bissau - 22.5% 16.5% N.A. 14.5% Corubal* 27.1% 11.3% 33.8% 100.0% Turkmenistan - Guinea-Bissau - Hari/Harirud* 17.4% 6.2% 0.0% 21.7% Gambia* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Helmand* 3.0% 1.7% 1.4% 0.4% Guinea-Bissau - Geba* 67.4% 64.6% 79.1% 100.0% Belize - Hondo* 13.0% 6.9% 7.8% 2.3% China - Indus* 7.5% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% Panama - Jurado 29.4% 33.4% N.A. N.A. Burkina Faso - Komoe* 21.7% 21.3% 20.2% 39.5% Ghana - Komoe* 2.9% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Mali - Komoe* 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Afghanistan - Kowl E Namaksar* 28.8% 6.6% 0.0% 3.0% Libya - Lake Chad** 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Little Scarcies 31.0% 16.7% 30.5% 0.0% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-3 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Sierra Leone - Little Scarcies 69.0% 83.3% 69.5% 100.0% Guinea - Loffa 11.5% 33.4% 0.0% N.A. Liberia - Loffa 88.5% 66.6% 100.0% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Mbe 7.1% 31.7% 0.0% N.A. Liberia - Moa 13.1% 7.5% 0.0% N.A. Belize - Moho 76.1% 74.6% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Moho 23.9% 25.4% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Motaqua 88.5% 96.4% 91.3% 100.0% Honduras - Motaqua* 11.5% 3.6% 8.7% 0.0% Turkmenistan - Murgab* 40.2% 33.7% 10.0% 82.0% Syria - Nahr El Kebir* 86.4% 93.5% N.A. 100.0% Algeria - Niger** 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Togo - Oueme** 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Mozambique - Pungwe* 94.3% 92.8% 77.0% 100.0% Zimbabwe - Pungwe* 5.7% 7.2% 23.0% 0.0% Malawi - Ruvuma* 0.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Saigon 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Saigon 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Costa Rica - San Juan 30.1% 11.5% 46.0% 30.2% Nicaragua - San Juan* 69.9% 88.5% 54.0% 69.8% Cameroon - Sanaga 99.0% 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% Belize - Sarstun 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Sarstun 93.4% 99.4% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - Sassandra* 12.3% 6.5% 22.6% 0.0% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-4 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Song Vam Co Dong 49.2% 38.6% 36.5% 19.2% Vietnam - Song Vam Co Dong 50.8% 61.4% 63.5% 80.8% Guinea - St. John (Africa) 16.9% 21.1% 27.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. John (Africa) 83.0% 78.9% 73.0% 100.0% Liberia - St. Paul 55.5% 44.9% 63.7% 100.0% Guinea - St. Paul* 44.5% 55.1% 36.3% 0.0% Bulgaria - Struma* 58.2% 63.4% 81.3% 52.6% Belize - Temash 85.0% 50.3% N.A. N.A. Saudi Arabia - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Indonesia - Tjeroaka- Wanggoe* 62.4% 97.9% 45.0% N.A. Papua New Guinea - Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 37.6% 2.1% 55.0% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Utamboni 40.9% 69.9% 43.9% N.A. Israel - Wadi Al Izziyah* 32.2% 26.2% 100.0% 37.2% Lebanon - Wadi Al Izziyah* 67.8% 73.8% 0.0% 62.8% Nigeria - Akpa e Hazard Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 37.9% 59.9% 26.2% 0.0% Bolivia - Amazon* 12.0% 23.8% 4.4% 11.9% Congo/Zaire 62.4% 75.4% 66.5% 96.8% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-5 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Moderate French Guiana - Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% France - Bidasoa 12.5% 22.5% N.A. N.A. Montenegro - Danube 0.9% 0.3% 3.0% 0.0% Turkey - Asi/Orontes* 49.9% 31.3% 54.7% 46.2% Spain - Bidasoa 87.5% 77.5% N.A. N.A. Bulgaria - Danube* 5.2% 4.0% 7.0% 4.7% Ethiopia - Awash* 92.7% 99.5% 100.0% 99.7% Guatemala - Candelaria* 14.5% 3.3% 0.0% N.A. Moldova - Danube* 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 2.5% Eritrea - Baraka* 62.7% 90.7% N.A. 19.1% Mexico - Candelaria* 85.5% 96.7% 100.0% N.A. Poland - Danube* 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Vietnam - Bei Jiang/Hsi* Guatemala - Coatan 2.4% 1.1% 2.7% 0.4% Achute* 12.6% 17.4% N.A. 0.0% Serbia - Danube* 9.4% 10.0% 4.7% 1.0% Cameroon - Benito/Ntem 42.0% 52.3% 31.2% N.A. Albania - Danube 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Douro/Duero* 18.2% 50.4% 38.3% 22.1% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ca/Song- Koi 35.2% 4.3% 51.0% 9.1% Latvia - Daugava 34.3% 29.8% 29.1% 0.0% Spain - Douro/Duero* 81.8% 49.6% 61.7% 77.9% Vietnam - Ca/Song-Koi 64.8% 95.7% 49.0% 90.9% Lithuania - Daugava* 1.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% Poland - Elbe 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Cavally 54.6% 71.1% 45.3% 92.2% Moldova - Dniester* 24.6% 36.6% 2.2% 56.4% Canada - Fraser 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 99.4% Liberia - Cavally Bangladesh - Ganges- 41.2% 20.1% 49.1% 7.8% Albania - Drin* 45.6% 37.5% 56.5% 60.2% Brahmaputra-Meghna 6.6% 19.6% 8.0% 9.7% Liberia - Cestos India - Ganges- 84.5% 40.8% 75.7% 100.0% Macedonia - Drin* 13.2% 8.8% 6.4% 10.5% Brahmaputra-Meghna 62.3% 75.2% 58.1% 83.4% Panama - Changuinola 92.8% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% France - Ebro 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% Portugal - Guadiana* 18.9% 17.4% 38.8% 11.8% Panama - Chiriqui 96.1% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Spain - Ebro 99.2% 97.8% 100.0% 99.7% Spain - Guadiana* 81.1% 82.6% 61.2% 88.2% Honduras - Choluteca* Bhutan - Ganges- 96.6% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% 0.2% China - Har Us Nur* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Nicaragua - Choluteca* 3.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Grijalva 38.3% 37.7% 43.7% 3.5% Mongolia - Har Us Nur* 96.8% 97.6% 97.9% 100.0% Gabon - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Grijalva* 61.6% 62.3% 56.3% 96.5% South Africa - Incomati* 62.3% 73.5% 100.0% 57.8% Malawi - Congo/Zaire* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Hondo* 29.8% 1.8% 51.5% 0.0% Swaziland - Incomati* 6.3% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0% Costa Rica - Corredores/Colorado 95.4% 90.1% 100.0% 100.0% Afghanistan - Indus* 6.3% 4.6% 9.6% 1.3% Namibia - Kunene** 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-6 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Georgia - Coruh 8.9% 20.5% 11.7% 0.0% Slovenia - Isonzo 60.9% 31.5% 53.6% 58.8% Uruguay - La Plata* 3.8% 1.1% 5.5% 2.8% Turkey - Coruh* 91.1% 79.5% 88.3% 100.0% Egypt - Jordan** 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Lima* 48.2% 66.5% 100.0% 74.7% Cameroon - Cross 23.7% 5.6% 36.5% 0.0% Sweden - Klaralven 84.8% 97.6% 82.0% 70.0% Spain - Lima* 51.8% 33.5% 0.0% 25.3% Nigeria - Cross Central African Republic Laos, People's Democratic 76.3% 94.4% 63.5% 100.0% - Lake Chad* 9.1% 2.8% 24.4% 0.0% Republic of - Mekong 25.1% 10.0% 36.4% 12.1% Ukraine - Don* 12.8% 33.6% 17.4% 49.9% Albania - Lake Prespa* 88.1% 97.9% 100.0% 94.3% Vietnam - Mekong 4.8% 18.0% 6.7% 14.8% Algeria - Dra** 21.4% 0.3% 0.0% 4.0% Greece - Lake Prespa* 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0% Portugal - Mino* 4.2% 5.6% 0.0% 13.3% Montenegro - Drin Macedonia - Lake 12.3% 7.4% 0.0% 3.2% Prespa* 8.6% 1.8% 0.0% 4.7% Spain - Mino* 95.8% 94.4% 100.0% 86.7% Serbia - Drin* United States of America - 28.8% 46.3% 37.1% 26.1% Russia - Lava/Pregel 75.3% 84.5% 78.8% 0.0% Nelson-Saskatchewan* 14.1% 12.4% 12.6% 5.7% Latvia - Gauja 90.4% 97.8% 100.0% N.A. Poland - Lava/Pregel* 24.7% 15.5% 21.2% 100.0% Nigeria - Niger 26.6% 66.4% 59.8% 15.6% China - Ganges- Czech Republic - Brahmaputra-Meghna 19.7% 0.3% 18.6% 3.0% Guatemala - Lempa* 14.0% 7.3% 36.0% 6.9% Oder/Odra 8.4% 10.9% 6.5% 0.0% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Han* 28.7% 4.4% 39.6% 30.9% Bulgaria - Maritsa* 66.5% 67.3% 58.1% 67.2% South Africa - Orange* 59.7% 84.3% 62.5% 60.1% Afghanistan - Hari/Harirud* 44.3% 37.5% 68.3% 14.4% Turkey - Maritsa* 25.9% 29.5% 37.9% 21.0% Botswana - Orange** 12.9% 1.3% 0.0% 3.3% Russia - Jenisej/Yenisey 87.2% 76.5% 97.1% 96.8% French Guiana - Maroni* 41.8% 54.7% 34.9% 100.0% China - Pu Lun T'o* 87.5% 97.9% 100.0% 98.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Kaladan 75.8% 79.6% 70.8% 32.9% Byelarus - Narva 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% N.A. Austria - Rhine 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Komoe* Mexico - Rio Grande 74.6% 67.6% 79.8% 60.5% Latvia - Narva 11.1% 13.9% 15.6% N.A. (North America)* 48.2% 75.4% 50.1% 68.5% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-7 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Iran - Kowl E Namaksar* United States of America - Rio Grande (North 71.2% 93.4% 100.0% 97.0% Byelarus - Neman 46.4% 44.3% 46.1% 98.4% America)* 51.8% 24.6% 49.9% 31.5% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Krka 12.8% 3.2% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Neman* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Macedonia - Struma* 11.7% 13.5% 0.0% 16.1% Croatia - Krka Central African Republic 87.2% 96.8% N.A. N.A. - Nile* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Serbia - Struma* 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% Georgia - Kura-Araks* Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 17.7% 19.0% 33.5% 22.3% Nile* 0.7% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% Portugal - Tagus/Tejo* 33.5% 33.9% 55.4% 42.1% Algeria - Lake Chad** 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% El Salvador - Paz* 45.8% 71.0% N.A. 76.0% Spain - Tagus/Tejo* 66.5% 66.1% 44.6% 57.9% Russia - Lake Ubsa-Nur Iraq - Tigris- 24.1% 21.3% 13.4% 36.9% Bulgaria - Rezvaya* 18.4% 2.3% N.A. N.A. Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 40.5% 45.0% 19.1% 55.2% Indonesia - Loes* Turkey - Tigris- 16.3% 6.6% N.A. 0.0% Turkey - Rezvaya* 81.6% 97.7% N.A. N.A. Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 24.8% 21.7% 53.3% 14.8% Greece - Maritsa* 7.6% 3.1% 4.0% 11.8% Mozambique - Ruvuma* 65.2% 26.4% 71.8% 75.6% South Africa - Umbeluzi** 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Algeria - Medjerda* 33.3% 33.0% 22.3% 9.8% Panama - Sixaola 18.5% 25.6% 0.0% N.A. Canada - Yukon 39.8% 22.9% 37.0% 0.0% Tunisia - Medjerda* 66.7% 67.0% 77.7% 90.2% Kazakhstan - Talas* 79.3% 74.9% 31.4% 78.8% Malawi - Zambezi* 8.0% 35.2% 6.0% 3.7% Togo - Mono* Jordan - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al 95.0% 85.6% 100.0% 97.7% Arab** 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Afghanistan - Murgab* Syria - Tigris- 59.8% 66.3% 90.0% 18.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 14.7% 16.2% 1.4% 17.1% Turkey - Nahr El Kebir* 13.6% 6.5% N.A. 0.0% Greece - Vardar* 12.0% 4.9% 0.0% 19.9% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-8 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Bosnia and Herzegovina - Neretva 96.5% 96.9% 100.0% 97.5% Macedonia - Vardar* 63.5% 52.9% 75.1% 70.1% Croatia - Neretva* 3.5% 3.1% 0.0% 2.5% Serbia - Vardar* 24.5% 42.2% 24.9% 10.0% Bulgaria - Nestos* Czech Republic - 53.4% 61.6% 54.9% 31.8% Vistula/Wista 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Greece - Nestos* 46.6% 38.4% 45.1% 68.2% Benin - Volta* 3.6% 2.7% 5.3% 2.9% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Nyanga* 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% N.A. Burkina Faso - Volta* 42.1% 48.4% 24.6% 30.1% Cameroon - Ogooue 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.0% Mali - Volta* 4.6% 2.7% 1.0% 0.9% Equatorial Guinea - Ogooue 0.9% 4.6% 1.8% 0.0% Togo - Volta* 6.3% 7.9% 20.1% 3.9% French Guiana - Oiapoque/Oyupock* 59.8% 25.4% 66.0% N.A. Ivory Coast - Volta** 3.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% Brazil - Orinoco United States of America 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Yaqui** 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.3% Venezuela - Orinoco 65.2% 83.4% 63.8% 57.5% Kenya - Pangani* 2.6% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Prohladnaja 77.1% 86.4% N.A. 100.0% Poland - Prohladnaja* 22.9% 13.6% N.A. 0.0% Liechtenstein - Rhine 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% 0.0% Estonia - Salaca 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% N.A. Latvia - Salaca 94.5% 98.6% 100.0% N.A. Central African Republic - Sanaga* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Moldova - Sarata* 37.0% 57.2% 100.0% 100.0% Ukraine - Sarata* 63.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Sassandra 87.7% 93.5% 77.4% 100.0% Indonesia - Sembakung 52.9% 18.5% 83.5% 100.0% Azerbaijan - Sulak* 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-9 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Kyrgyzstan - Tarim* 2.0% 0.1% 39.0% 0.5% Guatemala - Temash 15.0% 49.7% N.A. N.A. Georgia - Terek* 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Gabon - Utamboni 59.1% 30.1% 56.1% N.A. Chile - Valdivia* 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Bulgaria - Velaka* 94.4% 95.0% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Velaka* 5.6% 5.0% N.A. N.A. Cameroon - Akpa Brazil - Amazon Canada - Alsek Low Hazard 62.1% 40.1% 73.8% 100.0% 62.4% 31.4% 76.0% 3.6% 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Amur* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Amazon 6.3% 3.5% 11.7% 5.7% China - Amur* 42.6% 94.4% 26.6% 83.4% China - Aral Sea* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guyana - Amazon 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Aral Sea* 34.5% 5.2% 8.8% 31.1% Iran - Astara Chay* 82.6% 72.9% N.A. 100.0% Peru - Amazon 16.3% 35.1% 6.8% 54.1% Kyrgyzstan - Aral Sea* 9.1% 5.8% 23.4% 4.2% Mauritania - Atui** 64.6% 86.8% N.A. N.A. Ecuador - Amazon* 2.1% 6.1% 0.6% 24.7% Tajikistan - Aral Sea* 11.0% 15.3% 22.4% 10.7% Western Sahara - Atui** 35.4% 13.2% N.A. N.A. Suriname - Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Uzbekistan - Aral Sea* 31.1% 58.8% 9.3% 46.4% Argentina - Aviles* 88.8% 94.1% N.A. N.A. Russia - Amur 48.2% 5.3% 72.8% 16.0% Canada - Chilkat 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Aviles* United States of America - 11.2% 5.9% N.A. N.A. Afghanistan - Aral Sea* 8.5% 12.1% 34.3% 2.8% Chilkat 50.5% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Somalia - Awash** Turkmenistan - Aral 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% Sea* 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 4.8% Canada - Columbia 15.3% 6.1% 31.0% 3.9% Argentina - Aysen Dominican Republic - United States of America - 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% N.A. Artibonite* 27.2% 10.0% 45.3% 19.2% Columbia 84.7% 93.9% 69.0% 96.1% Chile - Aysen 95.9% 99.9% 100.0% N.A. Haiti - Artibonite* 72.8% 90.0% 54.7% 80.8% Austria - Danube 10.3% 9.4% 26.5% 5.7% Argentina - Baker* Bosnia and Herzegovina - 31.6% 26.9% 26.3% 9.6% Iran - Atrak* 68.9% 95.0% 97.1% 95.8% Danube 4.9% 4.7% 10.0% 0.2% Chile - Baker* 68.4% 73.1% 73.7% 90.4% Turkmenistan - Atrak* 31.1% 5.0% 2.9% 4.2% Germany - Danube 7.5% 11.9% 10.7% 0.8% Brunei - Bangau 54.4% 23.0% N.A. N.A. Ecuador - Chira** 38.1% 27.4% 59.7% 30.4% Romania - Danube 29.0% 26.8% 12.2% 63.6% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-10 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Malaysia - Bangau 45.6% 77.0% N.A. N.A. Peru - Chira** 61.9% 72.6% 40.3% 69.6% Slovakia - Danube 5.8% 6.3% 4.4% 7.5% Ireland - Bann Mexico - Coatan 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Achute* 87.4% 82.6% N.A. 100.0% Slovenia - Danube 2.2% 2.2% 6.2% 0.3% United Kingdom - Bann Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - 97.1% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% Congo/Zaire 6.7% 2.5% 8.0% 0.0% Croatia - Danube* 4.5% 3.9% 7.9% 0.0% Latvia - Barta 61.8% 39.7% 100.0% N.A. Burundi - Congo/Zaire* 0.4% 4.6% 0.2% 0.5% Czech Republic - Danube* 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 1.0% Lithuania - Barta 38.2% 60.3% 0.0% N.A. Rwanda - Congo/Zaire* 0.1% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% Hungary - Danube* 11.7% 12.2% 1.9% 7.8% Equatorial Guinea - Tanzania, United Benito/Ntem Republic of - 34.1% 35.8% 53.9% N.A. Congo/Zaire* 4.5% 5.9% 1.9% 2.0% Ukraine - Danube* 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 4.9% Gabon - Benito/Ntem 23.9% 11.9% 15.0% N.A. Argentina - Cullen* 17.1% 9.9% 0.0% N.A. Czech Republic - Elbe* 36.1% 25.9% 38.4% 37.5% Ivory Coast - Bia* 41.1% 39.6% 62.6% 100.0% Chile - Cullen* 82.9% 90.1% 100.0% N.A. Germany - Elbe* 62.7% 73.2% 61.6% 62.5% Mozambique - Buzi* United States of America - 88.7% 76.3% 86.3% 52.2% Italy - Danube 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Fraser 0.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% Zimbabwe - Buzi* 11.3% 23.7% 13.7% 47.8% Switzerland - Danube 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% France - Garonne 98.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Argentina - Carmen Silva/Chico* 59.2% 97.2% 100.0% N.A. Byelarus - Daugava 48.3% 64.7% 57.1% 100.0% Spain - Garonne* 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Carmen Silva/Chico* 40.8% 2.8% 0.0% N.A. Russia - Daugava 16.1% 4.5% 13.8% 0.0% Mozambique - Incomati** 31.3% 18.1% 0.0% 36.2% Ireland - Castletown 16.9% 40.7% 0.0% N.A. Byelarus - Dnieper 24.1% 19.7% 37.2% 2.3% India - Indus* 33.7% 35.0% 61.3% 38.6% United Kingdom - Castletown 83.1% 59.3% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Dnieper 17.8% 11.2% 22.8% 1.2% Pakistan - Indus* 52.5% 60.4% 10.1% 60.1% Costa Rica - Changuinola 7.2% 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% Ukraine - Dnieper* 58.0% 69.1% 40.1% 96.5% Angola - Kunene* 86.7% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% Argentina - Comau 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Poland - Dniester* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Argentina - La Plata* 27.7% 16.5% 11.2% 40.8% Chile - Comau 88.9% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Ukraine - Dniester* 75.3% 63.4% 97.8% 43.6% Brazil - Lagoon Mirim* 43.2% 53.8% 43.9% 65.8% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-11 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Sudan - Congo/Zaire* Peru - Lake Titicaca- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Indonesia - Fly 6.7% 0.9% 0.0% N.A. Poopo System* 42.9% 50.1% 55.9% 18.4% Uganda - Congo/Zaire** 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Papua New Guinea - Fly 93.3% 99.1% 100.0% N.A. Mozambique - Limpopo* 21.0% 7.5% 0.0% 47.9% Brazil - Corantijn/Courantyne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Eritrea - Gash** 53.6% 44.8% 58.0% 10.0% South Africa - Limpopo* 44.3% 78.8% 91.3% 38.7% Guyana - Corantijn/Courantyne* 52.0% 40.1% 38.9% N.A. Sudan - Gash** 23.9% 25.2% 0.0% 85.0% Mozambique - Maputo* 5.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% Suriname - Corantijn/Courantyne* 47.9% 59.9% 61.1% N.A. Norway - Glama 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Thailand - Mekong 24.6% 41.3% 16.1% 26.8% Angola - Cuvelai/Etosha* United States of America - 31.8% 16.1% 76.4% 0.0% Sweden - Glama 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mississippi* 98.4% 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Namibia - Canada - Nelson- Cuvelai/Etosha* 68.2% 83.9% 23.6% 100.0% China - Ili/Kunes He* 34.3% 51.0% 10.7% 27.2% Saskatchewan 85.9% 87.6% 87.4% 94.3% Pakistan - Dasht** Kazakhstan - Ili/Kunes 78.5% 95.6% N.A. 97.0% He* 60.2% 48.0% 64.8% 67.7% Cameroon - Niger 4.2% 4.2% 11.4% 5.6% Russia - Don Kyrgyzstan - Ili/Kunes 87.2% 66.4% 82.6% 50.1% He* 5.5% 1.0% 24.5% 5.1% Benin - Niger* 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% 0.6% Andorra - Ebro* 0.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% Italy - Isonzo 39.1% 68.5% 46.4% 41.2% Burkina Faso - Niger* 3.9% 3.0% 1.0% 0.7% Russia - Elancik* 73.0% 56.6% N.A. 0.0% Ethiopia - Juba-Shibeli* 45.7% 66.5% 66.8% 48.1% Chad - Niger* 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% Ukraine - Elancik* 27.0% 43.4% N.A. 100.0% Kenya - Juba-Shibeli* 26.8% 14.0% 31.5% 3.9% Niger - Niger** 23.6% 11.6% 0.8% 17.2% Austria - Elbe* 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Kemi* 94.4% 96.9% 96.3% N.A. Burundi - Nile* 0.4% 2.8% 0.8% 0.0% Ireland - Erne 57.5% 56.6% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Kemi* 5.6% 3.1% 3.7% N.A. Kenya - Nile* 1.7% 8.3% 6.0% 0.0% United Kingdom - Erne 42.5% 43.4% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Klaralven 15.2% 2.4% 18.0% 30.0% Rwanda - Nile* 0.7% 4.6% 1.8% 0.1% Brazil - Essequibo* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Armenia - Kura-Araks* 15.3% 22.9% 7.7% 9.0% Sudan - Nile* 63.6% 18.9% 38.2% 77.4% Guyana - Essequibo* Azerbaijan - Kura- Tanzania, United Republic 67.9% 83.1% 81.2% 66.8% Araks* 32.0% 34.6% 12.2% 40.2% of - Nile* 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% 0.0% Suriname - Essequibo* 10.1% 4.3% 6.1% 33.2% Iran - Kura-Araks* 20.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% Uganda - Nile* 7.9% 17.1% 6.9% 0.4% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-12 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Ireland - Fane 86.0% 84.1% N.A. N.A. Bolivia - La Plata* 8.3% 2.3% 2.9% 2.4% Egypt - Nile** 9.2% 25.6% 0.0% 19.3% United Kingdom - Fane 14.0% 15.9% N.A. N.A. Cameroon - Lake Chad* 2.0% 6.1% 12.9% 12.7% Mongolia - Ob** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bangladesh - Fenney* 34.3% 75.6% 0.0% 47.9% Chad - Lake Chad* 45.7% 22.2% 38.0% 32.7% Germany - Oder/Odra* 6.2% 4.1% 4.0% 24.3% India - Fenney* 65.7% 24.4% 100.0% 52.1% Nigeria - Lake Chad* 7.5% 56.5% 19.5% 26.3% Slovakia - Oder/Odra* 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% Ireland - Flurry 48.2% 68.9% N.A. N.A. Niger - Lake Chad** 28.2% 5.7% 0.4% 23.8% Namibia - Okavango* 24.9% 21.8% 0.7% 27.0% United Kingdom - Flurry 51.8% 31.1% N.A. N.A. Ethiopia - Lake Turkana* 54.8% 81.9% 79.4% 85.1% Botswana - Okavango** 50.7% 30.2% 7.1% 9.9% Ireland - Foyle 31.6% 20.4% 50.0% N.A. Kenya - Lake Turkana* 43.3% 17.7% 20.4% 14.9% Lesotho - Orange* 2.1% 12.8% 37.5% 0.7% United Kingdom - Foyle 68.4% 79.6% 50.0% N.A. Uganda - Lake Turkana* 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Norway - Pasvik 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Gallegos/Chico* 60.7% 81.9% 0.0% N.A. El Salvador - Lempa* 56.5% 85.0% 38.7% 92.4% Russia - Pasvik 16.5% 50.9% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Gallegos/Chico* 39.3% 18.1% 100.0% N.A. Honduras - Lempa* 29.5% 7.7% 25.3% 0.7% Finland - Pasvik* 77.2% 41.6% 100.0% N.A. Myanmar (Burma) - Ganges-Brahmaputra- Meghna 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Limpopo** 15.1% 5.5% 8.7% 7.4% Italy - Po 94.5% 98.1% 97.9% 99.5% Andorra - Garonne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Suriname - Maroni* 58.0% 45.3% 65.1% 0.0% Switzerland - Po 5.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% Ethiopia - Gash** Dominican Republic - 22.5% 30.0% 42.0% 5.0% Massacre* 45.7% 23.0% 0.0% 61.1% Switzerland - Rhine 14.1% 11.2% 31.5% 24.6% Estonia - Gauja 9.6% 2.2% 0.0% N.A. Haiti - Massacre* 54.3% 77.0% 100.0% 38.9% Belgium - Rhine* 8.0% 5.3% 6.0% 5.1% El Salvador - Goascoran* 47.7% 71.9% 51.1% 0.0% China - Mekong 21.8% 10.2% 18.6% 26.8% France - Rhine* 13.3% 7.3% 11.7% 8.3% Honduras - Goascoran* Myanmar (Burma) - 52.3% 28.1% 48.9% 100.0% Mekong* 3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 2.8% Germany - Rhine* 56.6% 66.1% 41.4% 36.5% Malaysia - Golok 43.6% 30.2% N.A. 10.9% Finland - Naatamo 41.3% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Luxembourg - Rhine* 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% Thailand - Golok 56.4% 69.8% N.A. 89.1% Norway - Naatamo 58.7% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Netherlands - Rhine* 5.7% 8.6% 2.1% 25.5% South Korea - Han* 71.3% 95.6% 60.4% 69.1% Estonia - Narva 33.8% 33.6% 43.0% N.A. France - Rhone 89.6% 85.0% 76.7% 77.9% Russia - Har Us Nur* 3.0% 2.4% 2.1% 0.0% Russia - Narva 53.4% 52.1% 41.4% N.A. Switzerland - Rhone 10.2% 15.0% 23.3% 22.1% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-13 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Iran - Hari/Harirud* 38.3% 56.4% 31.7% 63.9% Ethiopia - Nile 11.8% 16.4% 41.4% 2.8% Mauritania - Senegal** 50.3% 32.4% 2.0% 62.8% China - Irrawaddy 4.6% 4.2% 9.1% 7.7% Eritrea - Nile** 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Canada - Skagit 11.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% India - Irrawaddy United States of America - 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 2.7% Russia - Ob 74.3% 76.7% 90.8% 12.4% Skagit 88.3% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Irrawaddy 91.6% 92.7% 88.7% 89.6% Kazakhstan - Ob* 25.2% 22.8% 9.2% 86.1% Canada - St. Croix* 35.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% Norway - Jacobs United States of America - 68.3% 91.1% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Olanga 89.5% 63.2% 87.4% N.A. St. Croix* 64.9% 48.6% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Jacobs Canada - St. John (North 31.7% 8.9% 0.0% N.A. Finland - Olanga* 10.5% 36.8% 12.6% N.A. America) 63.5% 82.1% 59.9% 0.0% Mongolia - Jenisej/Yenisey United States of America - 12.8% 23.5% 2.9% 3.2% France - Po* 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% St. John (North America)* 36.5% 17.9% 40.1% 100.0% India - Kaladan 24.2% 20.4% 29.2% 67.1% Italy - Rhine 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Canada - St. Lawrence 53.0% 39.4% 55.5% 30.8% Bangladesh - Karnaphuli United States of America - 59.0% 86.7% 43.3% 74.9% France - Roia* 67.2% 34.2% N.A. 14.3% St. Lawrence 47.0% 60.6% 44.5% 69.2% India - Karnaphuli 40.8% 13.3% 56.7% 25.1% Italy - Roia* 32.8% 65.8% N.A. 85.7% Canada - Stikine 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Moldova - Kogilnik* Tanzania, United United States of America - 57.1% 82.1% 89.7% 100.0% Republic of - Ruvuma* 34.5% 70.8% 28.2% 24.4% Stikine 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Ukraine - Kogilnik* 42.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% Belgium - Schelde* 49.3% 56.5% 55.9% 36.8% Greece - Struma* 26.2% 22.3% 18.7% 31.3% Turkey - Kura-Araks* 14.3% 7.0% 29.8% 12.4% France - Schelde* 50.2% 43.4% 44.1% 62.5% Canada - Taku 90.2% 57.1% 100.0% N.A. Sudan - Lake Chad** United States of America - 3.5% 6.7% 4.8% 4.5% Netherlands - Schelde* 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% Taku 9.8% 42.9% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Lake Fagnano* 85.0% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Belgium - Seine* 2.2% 0.8% 7.0% 0.8% Mexico - Tijuana* 73.3% 95.8% N.A. 84.0% Chile - Lake Fagnano* United States of America - 15.0% 0.0% N.A. N.A. France - Seine* 97.7% 99.0% 93.0% 99.2% Tijuana* 26.7% 4.2% N.A. 16.0% Kenya - Lake Natron* Sweden - 33.0% 39.8% 27.0% 0.0% Luxembourg - Seine* 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Torne/Tornealven 67.7% 62.6% 30.5% N.A. Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-14 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Tanzania, United Republic of - Lake Natron* 67.0% 60.2% 73.0% 100.0% Indonesia - Sepik 3.3% 1.2% 0.0% N.A. Mozambique - Umbeluzi* 67.3% 92.6% 4.0% 20.0% Sudan - Lake Turkana** Papua New Guinea - 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Sepik 96.7% 98.8% 100.0% N.A. Ukraine - Vistula/Wista* 6.7% 7.9% 4.8% 0.0% Mongolia - Lake Ubsa- Nur* 75.9% 78.7% 86.6% 63.1% Kazakhstan - Shu/Chu* 93.0% 27.3% 92.5% 87.0% Canada - Whiting 76.9% N.A. N.A. N.A. Timor Leste - Loes* United States of America - 83.7% 93.4% N.A. 100.0% Kyrgyzstan - Shu/Chu* 7.0% 72.7% 7.5% 13.0% Whiting 23.1% N.A. N.A. N.A. Ethiopia - Lotagipi United States of America - Swamp** 8.4% 7.3% 40.3% N.A. Costa Rica - Sixaola 81.5% 74.4% 100.0% N.A. Yukon* 60.2% 77.1% 63.0% 100.0% Kenya - Lotagipi Swamp** 52.4% 63.5% 29.4% N.A. Guatemala - Suchiate* 73.5% 65.8% 0.0% 60.0% Mozambique - Zambezi* 11.8% 7.6% 6.8% 17.2% Sudan - Lotagipi Tanzania, United Republic Swamp** 34.1% 18.9% 30.2% N.A. Mexico - Suchiate* 26.5% 34.2% 100.0% 40.0% of - Zambezi* 2.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.2% Uganda - Lotagipi Swamp** 5.1% 10.2% 0.0% N.A. Kyrgyzstan - Talas* 20.7% 25.1% 68.6% 21.2% Zimbabwe - Zambezi* 15.5% 23.7% 8.2% 23.7% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ma* 43.8% 11.5% 44.2% 16.0% Finland - Tana* 41.1% 37.1% 83.8% N.A. Botswana - Zambezi** 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Vietnam - Ma* 56.2% 88.5% 55.8% 84.0% Norway - Tana* 58.9% 62.9% 16.2% N.A. Namibia - Zambezi** 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Brazil - Maroni* Iran - Tigris- 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 19.7% 17.1% 26.2% 12.9% Ecuador - Zarumilla** 78.7% 71.4% N.A. 88.4% Colombia - Mataje* Norway - 28.6% 43.5% N.A. 0.0% Torne/Tornealven 3.8% 1.1% 26.3% N.A. Peru - Zarumilla** 21.3% 28.6% N.A. 11.6% Ecuador - Mataje* Finland - 71.4% 56.5% N.A. 100.0% Torne/Tornealven* 28.6% 36.4% 43.2% N.A. Gabon - Mbe 92.9% 68.3% 100.0% N.A. Ecuador - Tumbes** 71.1% 74.3% 100.0% 82.3% Colombia - Mira* 51.8% 38.7% 85.5% 1.3% Peru - Tumbes** 28.9% 25.7% 0.0% 17.7% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-15 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Ecuador - Mira* 48.2% 61.3% 14.5% 98.7% China - Tumen* 69.7% 70.3% 50.1% 67.6% Russia - Mius* Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 70.4% 75.8% 0.0% 0.0% (North) - Tumen* 28.6% 29.6% 49.9% 32.4% Ukraine - Mius* 29.6% 24.2% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Tumen* 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Benin - Mono* 5.0% 14.4% 0.0% 2.3% Albania - Vijose* 64.5% 93.8% 55.3% 85.5% Honduras - Negro* 10.7% 24.3% 59.4% 0.5% Greece - Vijose* 35.5% 6.2% 44.7% 14.5% Nicaragua - Negro* Slovakia - 89.3% 75.7% 40.6% 99.5% Vistula/Wista* 1.0% 0.9% 3.1% 0.3% Gabon - Nyanga* 93.4% 97.3% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Volga 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Ogooue 11.9% 13.8% 10.2% 0.0% Byelarus - Volga* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Gabon - Ogooue 84.9% 78.4% 87.0% 100.0% Kazakhstan - Volga* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Brazil - Oiapoque/Oyupock 40.2% 74.6% 34.0% N.A. Ghana - Volta* 40.2% 37.0% 47.3% 60.6% Zimbabwe - Okavango* 3.2% 13.9% 0.3% 0.0% Finland - Vuoksa 86.4% 98.6% 93.9% 100.0% Kazakhstan - Oral/Ural 56.5% 30.3% 47.4% 94.8% Russia - Vuoksa 13.6% 1.4% 6.1% 0.0% Russia - Oral/Ural 43.5% 69.7% 52.6% 5.2% Mexico - Yaqui** 94.1% 94.8% 100.0% 97.7% Colombia - Orinoco 34.7% 16.6% 36.2% 42.5% Algeria - Oued Bon Naima** 36.6% 33.8% N.A. 15.2% Morocco - Oued Bon Naima** 63.4% 66.2% N.A. 84.8% Finland - Oulu 93.2% 99.6% 93.1% 100.0% Russia - Oulu 6.8% 0.4% 6.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Pakchan 51.1% 30.5% 47.7% 31.9% Thailand - Pakchan 48.9% 69.5% 52.3% 68.1% Argentina - Palena 45.0% 24.0% 9.3% N.A. Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-16 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Chile - Palena 55.0% 76.0% 90.7% N.A. Brunei - Pandaruan 58.0% 92.2% N.A. N.A. Malaysia - Pandaruan 42.0% 7.8% N.A. N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Pangani* 97.4% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Parnu 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Parnu 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Pascua* 46.1% 36.0% 41.5% N.A. Chile - Pascua* 53.9% 64.0% 58.5% N.A. Colombia - Patia* 97.6% 90.9% 100.0% 78.9% Ecuador - Patia* 2.4% 9.1% 0.0% 21.1% Russia - Pu Lun T'o* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Puelo 34.2% 12.0% 26.7% 0.0% Argentina - Puelo* 65.8% 88.0% 73.3% 100.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Red/Song Hong 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Red/Song Hong* 53.7% 38.4% 42.7% 55.3% Vietnam - Red/Song Hong* 45.6% 61.6% 57.3% 44.7% Argentina - Rio Grande (South America)* 49.6% 85.1% 30.4% N.A. Chile - Rio Grande (South America)* 50.4% 14.9% 69.6% N.A. Mozambique - Sabi* 26.1% 7.6% 9.3% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Sabi* 73.9% 92.4% 90.7% 100.0% China - Salween 52.4% 46.6% 45.7% 68.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Salween 43.8% 51.1% 46.5% 27.2% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-17 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Thailand - Salween* 3.7% 2.3% 7.8% 4.8% Azerbaijan - Samur* 6.5% 2.5% 0.0% 14.2% Russia - Samur* 93.5% 97.5% 100.0% 85.8% Argentina - San Martin* 12.2% 57.9% N.A. N.A. Chile - San Martin* 87.8% 42.1% N.A. N.A. Nigeria - Sanaga 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 0.0% Malaysia - Sembakung 47.1% 81.5% 16.5% 0.0% Argentina - Seno Union/Serrano* 10.3% 1.1% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Seno Union/Serrano* 89.7% 98.9% 100.0% N.A. China - Sujfun* 64.7% 60.0% 64.3% 60.2% Russia - Sujfun* 35.3% 40.0% 35.7% 39.8% Georgia - Sulak* 7.3% 0.2% 25.6% 0.0% Russia - Sulak* 92.4% 99.7% 74.4% 100.0% Algeria - Tafna* 74.6% 60.9% 100.0% 58.8% Morocco - Tafna** 25.4% 39.1% 0.0% 41.2% Indonesia - Tami 97.6% 97.8% 95.6% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tami 2.4% 2.2% 4.4% 0.0% Ghana - Tano* 89.1% 94.1% 68.5% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Tano* 10.9% 5.9% 31.5% 100.0% Afghanistan - Tarim* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Tarim* 97.2% 99.8% 58.4% 99.5% Tajikistan - Tarim* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Tarim** 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% Russia - Terek 95.3% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% Lesotho - Thukela* 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-18 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area South Africa - Thukela* 99.7% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Tuloma 92.1% 100.0% 84.3% N.A. Finland - Tuloma* 7.9% 0.0% 15.7% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Umba* 83.1% 88.1% 12.0% 100.0% Kenya - Umba** 16.9% 11.9% 88.0% 0.0% Argentina - Valdivia* 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Latvia - Venta 64.9% 34.3% 53.5% N.A. Lithuania - Venta 35.1% 65.7% 46.5% N.A. Denmark - Wiedau 85.0% 88.4% N.A. 100.0% Germany - Wiedau 15.0% 11.6% N.A. 0.0% China - Yalu* 52.9% 58.6% 50.7% 47.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Yalu* 47.1% 41.4% 49.3% 52.9% Chile - Yelcho 37.8% 17.5% 58.0% 0.0% Argentina - Yelcho* 62.2% 82.5% 42.0% 100.0% Belgium - Yser* 47.5% 53.1% N.A. 0.0% France - Yser* 52.5% 46.9% N.A. 100.0% Argentina - Zapaleri** 19.8% 2.4% 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Zapaleri** 21.7% 19.5% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Zapaleri** 58.5% 78.1% 0.0% N.A. Appendix 7 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Middle climate scenario A7-19 Figure A7-1. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience high increases in runoff variability for 2030. A7-20 Figure A7-2. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience moderate increases in runoff variability for 2030. A7-21 Figure A7-3. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience little or no increase in runoff variability for 2030. A7-22 Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario The data in this appendix are organized by risk levels as diagrammed in Figure 8 of the main text. Country-basin units are listed alphabetically in each category of combined vulnerability and hazard. In addition, the relative importance of the basin in several dimensions appear to the right of each CBU. The percentages listed are the proportions of the basin that the CBU contributes to the basin total for each variable (area from TFDD; population from Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008; runoff from Fekete, Vorosmarty and Grabs 2000; irrigated area from Doll and Siebert 2001). CBUs marked with a "**" had a high present hazard level. CBUs marked with a "*" had a medium present hazard level. CBUs with no asterisks had a low present hazard level. Figures A8-1, A8-2 and A8-3 show the hazard-vulnerability combinations used in the main text. High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Iran - High Hazard BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye Lebanon - An Nahr Al ** 99.8% 99.8% N.A. 100.0% Kabir* 32.6% 38.4% 100.0% 60.6% Mexico - Colorado* 1.6% 5.4% 0.0% 14.4% Sudan - Baraka* Syria - An Nahr Al United States of America 37.3% 9.3% N.A. 80.9% Kabir* 67.4% 61.6% 0.0% 39.4% - Colorado* 98.4% 94.6% 100.0% 85.6% Guinea - Cavally* Turkmenistan - Aral 4.2% 8.8% 5.6% 0.0% Sea* 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 4.8% Canada - Firth* 59.6% N.A. 0.0% N.A. Guinea - Cestos* India - Ganges- 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Hondo* 29.8% 1.8% 51.5% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 62.3% 75.2% 58.1% 83.4% Angola - Mozambique - Cuvelai/Etosha* 31.8% 16.1% 76.4% 0.0% Mexico - Hondo* 57.2% 91.3% 40.7% 97.7% Limpopo* 21.0% 7.5% 0.0% 47.9% Namibia - Kyrgyzstan - Ili/Kunes Tanzania, United Cuvelai/Etosha* 68.2% 83.9% 23.6% 100.0% He* 5.5% 1.0% 24.5% 5.1% Republic of - Nile* 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% 0.0% Algeria - Daoura** 47.3% 1.2% N.A. 0.0% Greece - Lake Prespa* 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0% Uganda - Nile* 7.9% 17.1% 6.9% 0.4% Iran - Dasht** 21.5% 4.4% N.A. 3.0% Uganda - Lake Turkana* 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Namibia - Okavango* 24.9% 21.8% 0.7% 27.0% Morocco - Dra* 78.6% 99.7% 100.0% 96.0% Panama - Sixaola 18.5% 25.6% 0.0% N.A. South Africa - Orange* 59.7% 84.3% 62.5% 60.1% Russia - Elancik* 73.0% 56.6% N.A. 0.0% Greece - Vardar* 12.0% 4.9% 0.0% 19.9% Mongolia - Pu Lun T'o* 12.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% Russia - Har Us Nur* 3.0% 2.4% 2.1% 0.0% Greece - Struma* 26.2% 22.3% 18.7% 31.3% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-1 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Bosnia and Herzegovina - Krka 12.8% 3.2% N.A. N.A. Croatia - Krka 87.2% 96.8% N.A. N.A. Greece - Maritsa* 7.6% 3.1% 4.0% 11.8% Greece - Nestos* 46.6% 38.4% 45.1% 68.2% Mozambique - Pungwe* 94.3% 92.8% 77.0% 100.0% Mozambique - Sabi* 26.1% 7.6% 9.3% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Sabi* 73.9% 92.4% 90.7% 100.0% Costa Rica - San Juan 30.1% 11.5% 46.0% 30.2% Algeria - Tafna* 74.6% 60.9% 100.0% 58.8% Indonesia - Tjeroaka- Wanggoe* 62.4% 97.9% 45.0% N.A. Papua New Guinea - Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 37.6% 2.1% 55.0% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Umba* 83.1% 88.1% 12.0% 100.0% Kenya - Umba** 16.9% 11.9% 88.0% 0.0% French Guiana - Moderate Hazard Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Amazon 6.3% 3.5% 11.7% 5.7% Canada - Alsek 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Turkey - Asi/Orontes* Bosnia and Herzegovina - 49.9% 31.3% 54.7% 46.2% Venezuela - Amazon 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Danube 4.9% 4.7% 10.0% 0.2% Iran - Astara Chay* 82.6% 72.9% N.A. 100.0% Lebanon - Asi/Orontes* 5.8% 3.1% 3.0% 4.8% Montenegro - Danube 0.9% 0.3% 3.0% 0.0% Mauritania - Atui** 64.6% 86.8% N.A. N.A. Syria - Asi/Orontes* 44.3% 65.6% 42.3% 49.0% Romania - Danube 29.0% 26.8% 12.2% 63.6% Western Sahara - Atui** 35.4% 13.2% N.A. N.A. Turkmenistan - Atrak* 31.1% 5.0% 2.9% 4.2% Bulgaria - Danube* 5.2% 4.0% 7.0% 4.7% China - Bei Jiang/Hsi 97.6% 98.9% 97.3% 99.6% Spain - Bidasoa 87.5% 77.5% N.A. N.A. Croatia - Danube* 4.5% 3.9% 7.9% 0.0% Vietnam - Bei Jiang/Hsi* 2.4% 1.1% 2.7% 0.4% Guatemala - Candelaria* 14.5% 3.3% 0.0% N.A. Moldova - Danube* 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 2.5% 88.7% 76.3% 86.3% 52.2% Mexico - Candelaria 85.5% 96.7% 100.0% N.A. Serbia - Danube 9.4% 10.0% 4.7% 1.0% Mozambique Buzi* Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-2 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Zimbabwe - Buzi* 11.3% 23.7% 13.7% 47.8% Burundi - Congo/Zaire* 0.4% 4.6% 0.2% 0.5% Spain - Douro/Duero* 81.8% 49.6% 61.7% 77.9% Venezuela - Catatumbo* 36.7% 27.0% 37.8% 17.6% Zambia - Congo/Zaire* 4.8% 2.8% 6.0% 0.5% Gambia, The - Gambia* 8.5% 28.5% 12.5% 68.8% Ivory Coast - Cavally 54.6% 71.1% 45.3% 92.2% Guinea - Corubal* 72.9% 88.7% 66.2% 0.0% Senegal - Gambia* 72.6% 42.3% 57.8% 4.3% Liberia - Cavally 41.2% 20.1% 49.1% 7.8% Ukraine - Dniester* 75.3% 63.4% 97.8% 43.6% France - Garonne 98.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Costa Rica - Changuinola 7.2% 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% Guinea - Gambia* 18.9% 29.3% 29.7% 26.9% Spain - Garonne* 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Panama - Changuinola Bhutan - Ganges- 92.8% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% 0.2% Spain - Guadiana* 81.1% 82.6% 61.2% 88.2% Honduras - Choluteca* 96.6% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Sudan - Gash** 23.9% 25.2% 0.0% 85.0% Mongolia - Har Us Nur* 96.8% 97.6% 97.9% 100.0% Nicaragua - Choluteca* 3.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Geba* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Lebanon - Jordan* 2.1% 1.0% 26.9% 2.3% Malawi - Congo/Zaire* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Senegal - Geba* 32.2% 35.1% 20.9% 0.0% Namibia - Kunene** 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% Turkey - Coruh* 91.1% 79.5% 88.3% 100.0% Iran - Helmand* 15.5% 12.5% 0.3% 25.3% Portugal - Lima* 48.2% 66.5% 100.0% 74.7% Ukraine - Don* 12.8% 33.6% 17.4% 49.9% China - Ili/Kunes He* 34.3% 51.0% 10.7% 27.2% Spain - Lima* 51.8% 33.5% 0.0% 25.3% Algeria - Dra** 21.4% 0.3% 0.0% 4.0% Afghanistan - Indus* 6.3% 4.6% 9.6% 1.3% Portugal - Mino* 4.2% 5.6% 0.0% 13.3% Ukraine - Elancik* 27.0% 43.4% N.A. 100.0% Italy - Isonzo 39.1% 68.5% 46.4% 41.2% Spain - Mino* 95.8% 94.4% 100.0% 86.7% Austria - Elbe* 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Slovenia - Isonzo 60.9% 31.5% 53.6% 58.8% Guinea - Niger 4.5% 2.3% 14.8% 0.8% El Salvador - Goascoran* 47.7% 71.9% 51.1% 0.0% Somalia - Juba-Shibeli** 27.5% 19.6% 1.6% 48.1% Niger - Niger** 23.6% 11.6% 0.8% 17.2% Honduras - Goascoran* 52.3% 28.1% 48.9% 100.0% Bolivia - La Plata* 8.3% 2.3% 2.9% 2.4% Kenya - Nile* 1.7% 8.3% 6.0% 0.0% Morocco - Guir** Ethiopia - Lake 22.5% 16.5% N.A. 14.5% Turkana* 54.8% 81.9% 79.4% 85.1% China - Ob* 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.5% South Korea - Han* 71.3% 95.6% 60.4% 69.1% Kenya - Lake Turkana* 43.3% 17.7% 20.4% 14.9% Mongolia - Ob** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-3 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Turkmenistan - Hari/Harirud* 17.4% 6.2% 0.0% 21.7% Honduras - Lempa* 29.5% 7.7% 25.3% 0.7% Germany - Oder/Odra* 6.2% 4.1% 4.0% 24.3% Belize - Hondo* 13.0% 6.9% 7.8% 2.3% Botswana - Limpopo* 19.6% 8.1% 0.0% 6.0% Lesotho - Orange* 2.1% 12.8% 37.5% 0.7% India - Irrawaddy 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 2.7% Turkey - Maritsa* 25.9% 29.5% 37.9% 21.0% Austria - Rhine 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Moldova - Kogilnik* 57.1% 82.1% 89.7% 100.0% Byelarus - Neman 46.4% 44.3% 46.1% 98.4% Belgium - Rhine* 8.0% 5.3% 6.0% 5.1% Turkey - Kura-Araks* 14.3% 7.0% 29.8% 12.4% Russia - Neman 5.3% 2.9% 6.3% 0.0% France - Rhine* 13.3% 7.3% 11.7% 8.3% Sudan - Lake Turkana** 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Poland - Neman* 4.2% 3.6% 5.2% 1.6% Netherlands - Rhine* 5.7% 8.6% 2.1% 25.5% Mongolia - Lake Ubsa- Nur* 75.9% 78.7% 86.6% 63.1% Bulgaria - Rezvaya* 18.4% 2.3% N.A. N.A. France - Rhone 89.6% 85.0% 76.7% 77.9% Russia - Lake Ubsa-Nur 24.1% 21.3% 13.4% 36.9% Turkey - Rezvaya* 81.6% 97.7% N.A. N.A. Mali - Senegal* 34.6% 36.5% 49.0% 13.1% Indonesia - Loes* 16.3% 6.6% N.A. 0.0% Belgium - Schelde* 49.3% 56.5% 55.9% 36.8% Senegal - Senegal* 8.1% 16.4% 8.3% 22.9% Timor Leste - Loes* United States of America 83.7% 93.4% N.A. 100.0% France - Schelde* 50.2% 43.4% 44.1% 62.5% - St. Lawrence 47.0% 60.6% 44.5% 69.2% Guinea - Loffa 11.5% 33.4% 0.0% N.A. Belgium - Seine* 2.2% 0.8% 7.0% 0.8% Spain - Tagus/Tejo* 66.5% 66.1% 44.6% 57.9% Ethiopia - Lotagipi Swamp** Turkey - Tigris- 8.4% 7.3% 40.3% N.A. France - Seine* 97.7% 99.0% 93.0% 99.2% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 24.8% 21.7% 53.3% 14.8% Sudan - Lotagipi Swamp** 34.1% 18.9% 30.2% N.A. Guinea - Senegal* 7.1% 14.7% 40.7% 1.2% Ukraine - Vistula/Wista* 6.7% 7.9% 4.8% 0.0% Uganda - Lotagipi Swamp** 5.1% 10.2% 0.0% N.A. Costa Rica - Sixaola 81.5% 74.4% 100.0% N.A. Angola - Zambezi* 18.4% 1.1% 22.1% 0.0% Colombia - Mataje* Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 28.6% 43.5% N.A. 0.0% (North) - Tumen* 28.6% 29.6% 49.9% 32.4% Malawi - Zambezi* 8.0% 35.2% 6.0% 3.7% Ecuador - Mataje* Tanzania, United 71.4% 56.5% N.A. 100.0% Russia - Tumen* 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Republic of - Zambezi* 2.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.2% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-4 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Equatorial Guinea - Mbe 7.1% 31.7% 0.0% N.A. Greece - Vijose* 35.5% 6.2% 44.7% 14.5% Algeria - Medjerda* Czech Republic - 33.3% 33.0% 22.3% 9.8% Vistula/Wista 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Tunisia - Medjerda* 66.7% 67.0% 77.7% 90.2% Mali - Volta* 4.6% 2.7% 1.0% 0.9% Russia - Mius* 70.4% 75.8% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Yaqui** 94.1% 94.8% 100.0% 97.7% Ukraine - Mius* Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 29.6% 24.2% 100.0% 100.0% Zambezi* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Syria - Nahr El Kebir* Guinea-Bissau - 86.4% 93.5% N.A. 100.0% Corubal* 27.1% 11.3% 33.8% 100.0% Turkey - Nahr El Kebir* Guinea-Bissau - 13.6% 6.5% N.A. 0.0% Gambia* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Honduras - Negro* 10.7% 24.3% 59.4% 0.5% Nicaragua - Negro* 89.3% 75.7% 40.6% 99.5% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Neretva 96.5% 96.9% 100.0% 97.5% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Nyanga* 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Ogooue 0.9% 4.6% 1.8% 0.0% Brazil - Oiapoque/Oyupock 40.2% 74.6% 34.0% N.A. Brazil - Orinoco 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Orinoco 34.7% 16.6% 36.2% 42.5% Venezuela - Orinoco 65.2% 83.4% 63.8% 57.5% Zimbabwe - Pungwe* 5.7% 7.2% 23.0% 0.0% Liechtenstein - Rhine 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% 0.0% Moldova - Sarata* 37.0% 57.2% 100.0% 100.0% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-5 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Ukraine - Sarata* 63.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Sassandra* 12.3% 6.5% 22.6% 0.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Song Vam Co Dong 49.2% 38.6% 36.5% 19.2% Vietnam - Song Vam Co Dong 50.8% 61.4% 63.5% 80.8% Guinea - St. Paul* 44.5% 55.1% 36.3% 0.0% Saudi Arabia - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Yalu* 52.9% 58.6% 50.7% 47.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Yalu* 47.1% 41.4% 49.3% 52.9% Belgium - Yser* 47.5% 53.1% N.A. 0.0% France - Yser* 52.5% 46.9% N.A. 100.0% Cameroon - Akpa Bolivia - Amazon China - Amur Low Hazard 62.1% 40.1% 73.8% 100.0% 12.0% 23.8% 4.4% 11.9% 42.6% 94.4% 26.6% 83.4% Nigeria - Akpa 37.9% 59.9% 26.2% 0.0% Brazil - Amazon 62.4% 31.4% 76.0% 3.6% Mongolia - Amur 9.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% Guyana - Amacuro 13.1% 85.0% 0.0% N.A. Ecuador - Amazon 2.1% 6.1% 0.6% 24.7% Kazakhstan - Aral Sea 34.5% 5.2% 8.8% 31.1% Venezuela - Amacuro 86.9% 15.0% 100.0% N.A. Guyana - Amazon 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Kyrgyzstan - Aral Sea 9.1% 5.8% 23.4% 4.2% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Amur 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Peru - Amazon 16.3% 35.1% 6.8% 54.1% Tajikistan - Aral Sea 11.0% 15.3% 22.4% 10.7% China - Aral Sea 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Suriname - Amazon 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Uzbekistan - Aral Sea 31.1% 58.8% 9.3% 46.4% Azerbaijan - Astara Chay 17.4% 27.1% N.A. 0.0% Russia - Amur 48.2% 5.3% 72.8% 16.0% Canada - Chilkat 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Aviles United States of America 88.8% 94.1% N.A. N.A. Afghanistan - Aral Sea 8.5% 12.1% 34.3% 2.8% - Chilkat 50.5% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-6 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Chile - Aviles Dominican Republic - 11.2% 5.9% N.A. N.A. Artibonite 27.2% 10.0% 45.3% 19.2% Canada - Columbia 15.3% 6.1% 31.0% 3.9% Djibouti - Awash United States of America 7.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Haiti - Artibonite 72.8% 90.0% 54.7% 80.8% - Columbia 84.7% 93.9% 69.0% 96.1% Ethiopia - Awash Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 92.7% 99.5% 100.0% 99.7% Iran - Atrak 68.9% 95.0% 97.1% 95.8% Congo/Zaire 62.4% 75.4% 66.5% 96.8% Somalia - Awash 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% France - Bidasoa 12.5% 22.5% N.A. N.A. Austria - Danube 10.3% 9.4% 26.5% 5.7% Argentina - Aysen Czech Republic - 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% N.A. Ecuador - Chira 38.1% 27.4% 59.7% 30.4% Danube 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 1.0% Chile - Aysen 95.9% 99.9% 100.0% N.A. Peru - Chira 61.9% 72.6% 40.3% 69.6% Germany - Danube 7.5% 11.9% 10.7% 0.8% Pakistan - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye Guatemala - Coatan 0.2% 0.2% N.A. 0.0% Achute 12.6% 17.4% N.A. 0.0% Hungary - Danube 11.7% 12.2% 1.9% 7.8% Argentina - Baker 31.6% 26.9% 26.3% 9.6% Mexico - Coatan Achute 87.4% 82.6% N.A. 100.0% Poland - Danube 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Chile - Baker 68.4% 73.1% 73.7% 90.4% Angola - Congo/Zaire 7.9% 1.9% 7.6% 0.0% Slovakia - Danube 5.8% 6.3% 4.4% 7.5% Brunei - Bangau 54.4% 23.0% N.A. N.A. Cameroon - Congo/Zaire 2.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% Slovenia - Danube 2.2% 2.2% 6.2% 0.3% Malaysia - Bangau Central African Republic 45.6% 77.0% N.A. N.A. - Congo/Zaire 10.9% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% Ukraine - Danube 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 4.9% Ireland - Bann Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Congo/Zaire 6.7% 2.5% 8.0% 0.0% Portugal - Douro/Duero 18.2% 50.4% 38.3% 22.1% United Kingdom - Bann 97.1% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% Rwanda - Congo/Zaire 0.1% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% Czech Republic - Elbe 36.1% 25.9% 38.4% 37.5% Eritrea - Baraka Tanzania, United Republic of - 62.7% 90.7% N.A. 19.1% Congo/Zaire 4.5% 5.9% 1.9% 2.0% Germany - Elbe 62.7% 73.2% 61.6% 62.5% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-7 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guyana - Barima 52.2% 99.3% 100.0% N.A. Argentina - Cullen 17.1% 9.9% 0.0% N.A. Poland - Elbe 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Venezuela - Barima United States of America 47.8% 0.7% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Cullen 82.9% 90.1% 100.0% N.A. - Firth 40.4% N.A. 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Barta 61.8% 39.7% 100.0% N.A. Albania - Danube 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Canada - Fraser 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 99.4% Lithuania - Barta United States of America 38.2% 60.3% 0.0% N.A. Italy - Danube 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Fraser 0.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% China - Beilun Bangladesh - Ganges- 84.0% 69.2% 100.0% 95.8% Switzerland - Danube 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 6.6% 19.6% 8.0% 9.7% Vietnam - Beilun Nepal - Ganges- 16.0% 30.8% 0.0% 4.2% Byelarus - Daugava 48.3% 64.7% 57.1% 100.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 9.0% 4.6% 11.9% 3.6% Belize - Belize 61.9% 51.5% 83.5% 100.0% Latvia - Daugava 34.3% 29.8% 29.1% 0.0% Portugal - Guadiana 18.9% 17.4% 38.8% 11.8% Guatemala - Belize 38.1% 48.5% 16.5% 0.0% Lithuania - Daugava 1.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% China - Har Us Nur 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Cameroon - Benito/Ntem 42.0% 52.3% 31.2% N.A. Russia - Daugava 16.1% 4.5% 13.8% 0.0% Mozambique - Incomati 31.3% 18.1% 0.0% 36.2% Equatorial Guinea - Benito/Ntem 34.1% 35.8% 53.9% N.A. Byelarus - Dnieper 24.1% 19.7% 37.2% 2.3% South Africa - Incomati 62.3% 73.5% 100.0% 57.8% Gabon - Benito/Ntem 23.9% 11.9% 15.0% N.A. Russia - Dnieper 17.8% 11.2% 22.8% 1.2% Swaziland - Incomati 6.3% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0% Ghana - Bia 58.9% 60.4% 37.4% 0.0% Ukraine - Dnieper 58.0% 69.1% 40.1% 96.5% India - Indus 33.7% 35.0% 61.3% 38.6% Ivory Coast - Bia 41.1% 39.6% 62.6% 100.0% Moldova - Dniester 24.6% 36.6% 2.2% 56.4% Pakistan - Indus 52.5% 60.4% 10.1% 60.1% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ca/Song-Koi 35.2% 4.3% 51.0% 9.1% Poland - Dniester 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Israel - Jordan 27.0% 4.2% 42.5% 31.3% Vietnam - Ca/Song-Koi 64.8% 95.7% 49.0% 90.9% Albania - Drin 45.6% 37.5% 56.5% 60.2% Jordan - Jordan 57.1% 83.4% 20.6% 43.2% Bolivia - Cancoso/Lauca 85.8% 96.2% 70.0% 100.0% Macedonia - Drin 13.2% 8.8% 6.4% 10.5% Syria - Jordan 13.3% 11.5% 10.0% 23.2% Chile - Cancoso/Lauca 14.2% 3.8% 30.0% 0.0% France - Ebro 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% Angola - Kunene 86.7% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% Argentina - Carmen Silva/Chico 59.2% 97.2% 100.0% N.A. Spain - Ebro 99.2% 97.8% 100.0% 99.7% Argentina - La Plata 27.7% 16.5% 11.2% 40.8% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-8 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Chile - Carmen Silva/Chico 40.8% 2.8% 0.0% N.A. Indonesia - Fly 6.7% 0.9% 0.0% N.A. Brazil - La Plata 46.7% 70.2% 71.7% 29.5% Ireland - Castletown 16.9% 40.7% 0.0% N.A. Papua New Guinea - Fly 93.3% 99.1% 100.0% N.A. Paraguay - La Plata 13.5% 9.8% 8.7% 24.6% United Kingdom - Castletown 83.1% 59.3% 100.0% N.A. Eritrea - Gash 53.6% 44.8% 58.0% 10.0% Uruguay - La Plata 3.8% 1.1% 5.5% 2.8% Colombia - Catatumbo 63.3% 73.0% 62.2% 82.4% Norway - Glama 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Brazil - Lagoon Mirim 43.2% 53.8% 43.9% 65.8% Ivory Coast - Cestos 15.3% 59.1% 24.3% 0.0% Sweden - Glama 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Uruguay - Lagoon Mirim 56.8% 46.2% 56.1% 34.2% Liberia - Cestos Bolivia - Lake Titicaca- 84.5% 40.8% 75.7% 100.0% Guinea - Great Scarcies 74.7% 59.8% 48.6% 79.1% Poopo System 56.4% 49.9% 44.1% 81.6% Guatemala - Chamelecon Sierra Leone - Great Chile - Lake Titicaca- 2.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Scarcies 25.3% 40.2% 51.4% 20.9% Poopo System 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Honduras - Chamelecon Peru - Lake Titicaca- 97.2% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Guatemala - Grijalva 38.3% 37.7% 43.7% 3.5% Poopo System 42.9% 50.1% 55.9% 18.4% Angola - Chiloango 32.5% 5.7% 30.3% N.A. Mexico - Grijalva 61.6% 62.3% 56.3% 96.5% South Africa - Limpopo 44.3% 78.8% 91.3% 38.7% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Chiloango 64.7% 92.7% 69.7% N.A. Afghanistan - Helmand 81.5% 85.8% 98.3% 74.3% Mozambique - Maputo 5.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Kazakhstan - Ili/Kunes Chiloango 2.8% 1.5% 0.0% N.A. He 60.2% 48.0% 64.8% 67.7% South Africa - Maputo 60.1% 39.4% 70.1% 36.8% Panama - Chiriqui 96.1% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Egypt - Jordan 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Swaziland - Maputo 34.9% 59.7% 29.9% 62.4% Honduras - Coco/Segovia Cambodia (Kampuchea) - 24.3% 7.4% 43.4% 7.3% Ethiopia - Juba-Shibeli 45.7% 66.5% 66.8% 48.1% Mekong 20.1% 19.4% 20.0% 16.8% Nicaragua - Laos, People's Coco/Segovia Democratic Republic of - 75.7% 92.6% 56.6% 92.7% Kenya - Juba-Shibeli 26.8% 14.0% 31.5% 3.9% Mekong 25.1% 10.0% 36.4% 12.1% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-9 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Argentina - Comau 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Finland - Kemi 94.4% 96.9% 96.3% N.A. Thailand - Mekong 24.6% 41.3% 16.1% 26.8% Chile - Comau 88.9% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Kemi 5.6% 3.1% 3.7% N.A. Vietnam - Mekong 4.8% 18.0% 6.7% 14.8% Gabon - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Norway - Klaralven 15.2% 2.4% 18.0% 30.0% Canada - Mississippi 1.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Sudan - Congo/Zaire United States of America 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Sweden - Klaralven 84.8% 97.6% 82.0% 70.0% - Mississippi 98.4% 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Uganda - Congo/Zaire Canada - Nelson- 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Armenia - Kura-Araks 15.3% 22.9% 7.7% 9.0% Saskatchewan 85.9% 87.6% 87.4% 94.3% Brazil - Corantijn/Courantyne United States of America 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Azerbaijan - Kura-Araks 32.0% 34.6% 12.2% 40.2% - Nelson-Saskatchewan 14.1% 12.4% 12.6% 5.7% Guyana - Corantijn/Courantyne 52.0% 40.1% 38.9% N.A. Iran - Kura-Araks 20.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% Benin - Niger 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% 0.6% Suriname - Corantijn/Courantyne 47.9% 59.9% 61.1% N.A. Cameroon - Lake Chad 2.0% 6.1% 12.9% 12.7% Burkina Faso - Niger 3.9% 3.0% 1.0% 0.7% Costa Rica - Central African Republic Corredores/Colorado 95.4% 90.1% 100.0% 100.0% - Lake Chad 9.1% 2.8% 24.4% 0.0% Cameroon - Niger 4.2% 4.2% 11.4% 5.6% Georgia - Coruh 8.9% 20.5% 11.7% 0.0% Chad - Lake Chad 45.7% 22.2% 38.0% 32.7% Chad - Niger 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% Cameroon - Cross 23.7% 5.6% 36.5% 0.0% Niger - Lake Chad 28.2% 5.7% 0.4% 23.8% Ivory Coast - Niger 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.1% Nigeria - Cross 76.3% 94.4% 63.5% 100.0% Nigeria - Lake Chad 7.5% 56.5% 19.5% 26.3% Mali - Niger 25.6% 9.6% 5.9% 59.4% Morocco - Daoura 52.7% 98.8% N.A. 100.0% Albania - Lake Prespa 88.1% 97.9% 100.0% 94.3% Nigeria - Niger 26.6% 66.4% 59.8% 15.6% Pakistan - Dasht 78.5% 95.6% N.A. 97.0% Macedonia - Lake Prespa 8.6% 1.8% 0.0% 4.7% Burundi - Nile 0.4% 2.8% 0.8% 0.0% Russia - Don 87.2% 66.4% 82.6% 50.1% Poland - Lava/Pregel 24.7% 15.5% 21.2% 100.0% Egypt - Nile 9.2% 25.6% 0.0% 19.3% Montenegro - Drin 12.3% 7.4% 0.0% 3.2% Russia - Lava/Pregel 75.3% 84.5% 78.8% 0.0% Rwanda - Nile 0.7% 4.6% 1.8% 0.1% Serbia - Drin 28.8% 46.3% 37.1% 26.1% El Salvador - Lempa 56.5% 85.0% 38.7% 92.4% Sudan - Nile 63.6% 18.9% 38.2% 77.4% Andorra - Ebro Czech Republic - 0.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Lempa 14.0% 7.3% 36.0% 6.9% Oder/Odra 8.4% 10.9% 6.5% 0.0% Ireland - Erne 57.5% 56.6% 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Lielupe 66.5% 67.2% 65.9% N.A. Poland - Oder/Odra 84.2% 84.4% 89.5% 75.4% United Kingdom - Erne 42.5% 43.4% 0.0% N.A. Lithuania - Lielupe 33.5% 32.8% 34.1% N.A. Slovakia - Oder/Odra 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-10 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Brazil - Essequibo 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Limpopo 15.1% 5.5% 8.7% 7.4% Angola - Okavango 21.2% 34.1% 92.0% 63.1% Guyana - Essequibo 67.9% 83.1% 81.2% 66.8% Liberia - Mana-Morro 83.4% 77.8% 100.0% N.A. Botswana - Okavango 50.7% 30.2% 7.1% 9.9% Suriname - Essequibo Sierra Leone - Mana- 10.1% 4.3% 6.1% 33.2% Morro 16.6% 22.2% 0.0% N.A. Botswana - Orange 12.9% 1.3% 0.0% 3.3% Venezuela - Essequibo 21.9% 12.6% 12.7% 0.0% Bulgaria - Maritsa 66.5% 67.3% 58.1% 67.2% Namibia - Orange 25.4% 1.6% 0.0% 35.9% Ireland - Fane 86.0% 84.1% N.A. N.A. French Guiana - Maroni 41.8% 54.7% 34.9% 100.0% Finland - Pasvik 77.2% 41.6% 100.0% N.A. United Kingdom - Fane 14.0% 15.9% N.A. N.A. Suriname - Maroni 58.0% 45.3% 65.1% 0.0% Norway - Pasvik 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% N.A. Bangladesh - Fenney Dominican Republic - 34.3% 75.6% 0.0% 47.9% Massacre 45.7% 23.0% 0.0% 61.1% Russia - Pasvik 16.5% 50.9% 0.0% N.A. India - Fenney 65.7% 24.4% 100.0% 52.1% Haiti - Massacre 54.3% 77.0% 100.0% 38.9% Italy - Po 94.5% 98.1% 97.9% 99.5% Ireland - Flurry 48.2% 68.9% N.A. N.A. China - Mekong 21.8% 10.2% 18.6% 26.8% Switzerland - Po 5.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% United Kingdom - Flurry Myanmar (Burma) - 51.8% 31.1% N.A. N.A. Mekong 3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 2.8% China - Pu Lun T'o 87.5% 97.9% 100.0% 98.0% Ireland - Foyle 31.6% 20.4% 50.0% N.A. Guinea - Moa 39.3% 37.5% 39.9% N.A. Germany - Rhine 56.6% 66.1% 41.4% 36.5% United Kingdom - Foyle 68.4% 79.6% 50.0% N.A. Sierra Leone - Moa 47.6% 55.0% 60.1% N.A. Luxembourg - Rhine 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% Argentina - Gallegos/Chico 60.7% 81.9% 0.0% N.A. Finland - Naatamo 41.3% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Switzerland - Rhine 14.1% 11.2% 31.5% 24.6% Chile - Gallegos/Chico 39.3% 18.1% 100.0% N.A. Norway - Naatamo 58.7% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Switzerland - Rhone 10.2% 15.0% 23.3% 22.1% China - Ganges- Mexico - Rio Grande Brahmaputra-Meghna 19.7% 0.3% 18.6% 3.0% Byelarus - Narva 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% N.A. (North America) 48.2% 75.4% 50.1% 68.5% Myanmar (Burma) - United States of America Ganges-Brahmaputra- - Rio Grande (North Meghna 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Estonia - Narva 33.8% 33.6% 43.0% N.A. America) 51.8% 24.6% 49.9% 31.5% Andorra - Garonne 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Latvia - Narva 11.1% 13.9% 15.6% N.A. Mauritania - Senegal 50.3% 32.4% 2.0% 62.8% Ethiopia - Gash 22.5% 30.0% 42.0% 5.0% Russia - Narva 53.4% 52.1% 41.4% N.A. Canada - Skagit 11.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Estonia - Gauja United States of America 9.6% 2.2% 0.0% N.A. Latvia - Neman 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% - Skagit 88.3% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-11 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Latvia - Gauja 90.4% 97.8% 100.0% N.A. Lithuania - Neman 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 0.0% Canada - St. Croix 35.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% Malaysia - Golok Central African Republic United States of America 43.6% 30.2% N.A. 10.9% - Nile 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - St. Croix 64.9% 48.6% 100.0% 100.0% Thailand - Golok Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Canada - St. John (North 56.4% 69.8% N.A. 89.1% Nile 0.7% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% America) 63.5% 82.1% 59.9% 0.0% Belize - Grijalva United States of America - St. John (North 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Eritrea - Nile 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% America) 36.5% 17.9% 40.1% 100.0% Algeria - Guir 77.5% 83.5% N.A. 85.5% Ethiopia - Nile 11.8% 16.4% 41.4% 2.8% Canada - St. Lawrence 53.0% 39.4% 55.5% 30.8% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Han 28.7% 4.4% 39.6% 30.9% Kazakhstan - Ob 25.2% 22.8% 9.2% 86.1% Canada - Stikine 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Afghanistan - United States of America Hari/Harirud 44.3% 37.5% 68.3% 14.4% Russia - Ob 74.3% 76.7% 90.8% 12.4% - Stikine 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Iran - Hari/Harirud 38.3% 56.4% 31.7% 63.9% Finland - Olanga 10.5% 36.8% 12.6% N.A. Macedonia - Struma 11.7% 13.5% 0.0% 16.1% Pakistan - Helmand 3.0% 1.7% 1.4% 0.4% Russia - Olanga 89.5% 63.2% 87.4% N.A. Serbia - Struma 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% China - Indus 7.5% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% Benin - Oueme 82.9% 81.8% 91.3% 89.4% Portugal - Tagus/Tejo 33.5% 33.9% 55.4% 42.1% China - Irrawaddy 4.6% 4.2% 9.1% 7.7% Nigeria - Oueme 16.4% 17.9% 8.7% 10.6% Canada - Taku 90.2% 57.1% 100.0% N.A. Myanmar (Burma) - United States of America Irrawaddy 91.6% 92.7% 88.7% 89.6% El Salvador - Paz 45.8% 71.0% N.A. 76.0% - Taku 9.8% 42.9% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Jacobs Iraq - Tigris- 68.3% 91.1% 100.0% N.A. Guatemala - Paz 54.2% 29.0% N.A. 24.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 40.5% 45.0% 19.1% 55.2% Russia - Jacobs 31.7% 8.9% 0.0% N.A. France - Po 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Tijuana 73.3% 95.8% N.A. 84.0% Mongolia - United States of America Jenisej/Yenisey 12.8% 23.5% 2.9% 3.2% Italy - Rhine 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Tijuana 26.7% 4.2% N.A. 16.0% Russia - Jenisej/Yenisey Sweden - 87.2% 76.5% 97.1% 96.8% France - Roia 67.2% 34.2% N.A. 14.3% Torne/Tornealven 67.7% 62.6% 30.5% N.A. Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-12 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Panama - Jurado 29.4% 33.4% N.A. N.A. Italy - Roia 32.8% 65.8% N.A. 85.7% Mozambique - Umbeluzi 67.3% 92.6% 4.0% 20.0% India - Kaladan 24.2% 20.4% 29.2% 67.1% Mozambique - Ruvuma 65.2% 26.4% 71.8% 75.6% South Africa - Umbeluzi 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Tanzania, United Kaladan 75.8% 79.6% 70.8% 32.9% Republic of - Ruvuma 34.5% 70.8% 28.2% 24.4% Swaziland - Umbeluzi 32.5% 7.4% 96.0% 80.0% Bangladesh - Karnaphuli 59.0% 86.7% 43.3% 74.9% Netherlands - Schelde 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% Canada - Whiting 76.9% N.A. N.A. N.A. India - Karnaphuli United States of America 40.8% 13.3% 56.7% 25.1% Luxembourg - Seine 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% - Whiting 23.1% N.A. N.A. N.A. Ukraine - Kogilnik 42.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% Indonesia - Sepik 3.3% 1.2% 0.0% N.A. Canada - Yukon 39.8% 22.9% 37.0% 0.0% Burkina Faso - Komoe Papua New Guinea - United States of America 21.7% 21.3% 20.2% 39.5% Sepik 96.7% 98.8% 100.0% N.A. - Yukon 60.2% 77.1% 63.0% 100.0% Ghana - Komoe 2.9% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Shu/Chu 93.0% 27.3% 92.5% 87.0% Botswana - Zambezi 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Komoe 74.6% 67.6% 79.8% 60.5% Kyrgyzstan - Shu/Chu 7.0% 72.7% 7.5% 13.0% Mozambique - Zambezi 11.8% 7.6% 6.8% 17.2% Mali - Komoe 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Suchiate 73.5% 65.8% 0.0% 60.0% Namibia - Zambezi 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Afghanistan - Kowl E Namaksar 28.8% 6.6% 0.0% 3.0% Mexico - Suchiate 26.5% 34.2% 100.0% 40.0% Zambia - Zambezi 41.6% 27.4% 54.9% 55.0% Iran - Kowl E Namaksar 71.2% 93.4% 100.0% 97.0% Kazakhstan - Talas 79.3% 74.9% 31.4% 78.8% Zimbabwe - Zambezi 15.5% 23.7% 8.2% 23.7% Georgia - Kura-Araks 17.7% 19.0% 33.5% 22.3% Kyrgyzstan - Talas 20.7% 25.1% 68.6% 21.2% Ecuador - Zarumilla 78.7% 71.4% N.A. 88.4% Algeria - Lake Chad 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Tana 41.1% 37.1% 83.8% N.A. Peru - Zarumilla 21.3% 28.6% N.A. 11.6% Libya - Lake Chad 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Norway - Tana 58.9% 62.9% 16.2% N.A. Sudan - Lake Chad Iran - Tigris- 3.5% 6.7% 4.8% 4.5% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 19.7% 17.1% 26.2% 12.9% Argentina - Lake Fagnano Jordan - Tigris- 85.0% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-13 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Chile - Lake Fagnano Syria - Tigris- 15.0% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 14.7% 16.2% 1.4% 17.1% Kenya - Lake Natron Finland - 33.0% 39.8% 27.0% 0.0% Torne/Tornealven 28.6% 36.4% 43.2% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Lake Norway - Natron 67.0% 60.2% 73.0% 100.0% Torne/Tornealven 3.8% 1.1% 26.3% N.A. Guinea - Little Scarcies 31.0% 16.7% 30.5% 0.0% Ecuador - Tumbes 71.1% 74.3% 100.0% 82.3% Sierra Leone - Little Scarcies 69.0% 83.3% 69.5% 100.0% Peru - Tumbes 28.9% 25.7% 0.0% 17.7% Liberia - Loffa 88.5% 66.6% 100.0% N.A. China - Tumen 69.7% 70.3% 50.1% 67.6% Kenya - Lotagipi Swamp 52.4% 63.5% 29.4% N.A. Macedonia - Vardar 63.5% 52.9% 75.1% 70.1% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ma 43.8% 11.5% 44.2% 16.0% Serbia - Vardar 24.5% 42.2% 24.9% 10.0% Vietnam - Ma 56.2% 88.5% 55.8% 84.0% Albania - Vijose 64.5% 93.8% 55.3% 85.5% Brazil - Maroni 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Vistula/Wista 5.1% 2.4% 2.9% 8.8% Gabon - Mbe 92.9% 68.3% 100.0% N.A. Poland - Vistula/Wista 87.2% 88.9% 89.2% 90.9% Colombia - Mira 51.8% 38.7% 85.5% 1.3% Slovakia - Vistula/Wista 1.0% 0.9% 3.1% 0.3% Ecuador - Mira 48.2% 61.3% 14.5% 98.7% Byelarus - Volga 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Liberia - Moa 13.1% 7.5% 0.0% N.A. Kazakhstan - Volga 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Belize - Moho 76.1% 74.6% N.A. N.A. Russia - Volga 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% Guatemala - Moho 23.9% 25.4% N.A. N.A. Benin - Volta 3.6% 2.7% 5.3% 2.9% Benin - Mono 5.0% 14.4% 0.0% 2.3% Burkina Faso - Volta 42.1% 48.4% 24.6% 30.1% Togo - Mono 95.0% 85.6% 100.0% 97.7% Ghana - Volta 40.2% 37.0% 47.3% 60.6% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-14 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guatemala - Motaqua 88.5% 96.4% 91.3% 100.0% Ivory Coast - Volta 3.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% Honduras - Motaqua 11.5% 3.6% 8.7% 0.0% Togo - Volta 6.3% 7.9% 20.1% 3.9% Afghanistan - Murgab 59.8% 66.3% 90.0% 18.0% Finland - Vuoksa 86.4% 98.6% 93.9% 100.0% Turkmenistan - Murgab 40.2% 33.7% 10.0% 82.0% Russia - Vuoksa 13.6% 1.4% 6.1% 0.0% Croatia - Neretva United States of America 3.5% 3.1% 0.0% 2.5% - Yaqui 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.3% Bulgaria - Nestos 53.4% 61.6% 54.9% 31.8% Guinea-Bissau - Geba 67.4% 64.6% 79.1% 100.0% Algeria - Niger 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Gabon - Nyanga 93.4% 97.3% 100.0% N.A. Cameroon - Ogooue 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.0% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Ogooue 11.9% 13.8% 10.2% 0.0% Gabon - Ogooue 84.9% 78.4% 87.0% 100.0% French Guiana - Oiapoque/Oyupock 59.8% 25.4% 66.0% N.A. Zimbabwe - Okavango 3.2% 13.9% 0.3% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Oral/Ural 56.5% 30.3% 47.4% 94.8% Russia - Oral/Ural 43.5% 69.7% 52.6% 5.2% Algeria - Oued Bon Naima 36.6% 33.8% N.A. 15.2% Morocco - Oued Bon Naima 63.4% 66.2% N.A. 84.8% Togo - Oueme 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Oulu 93.2% 99.6% 93.1% 100.0% Russia - Oulu 6.8% 0.4% 6.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Pakchan 51.1% 30.5% 47.7% 31.9% Thailand - Pakchan 48.9% 69.5% 52.3% 68.1% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-15 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Argentina - Palena 45.0% 24.0% 9.3% N.A. Chile - Palena 55.0% 76.0% 90.7% N.A. Brunei - Pandaruan 58.0% 92.2% N.A. N.A. Malaysia - Pandaruan 42.0% 7.8% N.A. N.A. Kenya - Pangani 2.6% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Tanzania, United Republic of - Pangani 97.4% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Parnu 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Parnu 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Pascua 46.1% 36.0% 41.5% N.A. Chile - Pascua 53.9% 64.0% 58.5% N.A. Colombia - Patia 97.6% 90.9% 100.0% 78.9% Ecuador - Patia 2.4% 9.1% 0.0% 21.1% Poland - Prohladnaja 22.9% 13.6% N.A. 0.0% Russia - Prohladnaja 77.1% 86.4% N.A. 100.0% Russia - Pu Lun T'o 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Argentina - Puelo 65.8% 88.0% 73.3% 100.0% Chile - Puelo 34.2% 12.0% 26.7% 0.0% China - Red/Song Hong 53.7% 38.4% 42.7% 55.3% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Red/Song Hong 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Red/Song Hong 45.6% 61.6% 57.3% 44.7% Argentina - Rio Grande (South America) 49.6% 85.1% 30.4% N.A. Chile - Rio Grande (South America) 50.4% 14.9% 69.6% N.A. Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-16 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Malawi - Ruvuma 0.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Saigon 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Saigon 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Salaca 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% N.A. Latvia - Salaca 94.5% 98.6% 100.0% N.A. China - Salween 52.4% 46.6% 45.7% 68.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Salween 43.8% 51.1% 46.5% 27.2% Thailand - Salween 3.7% 2.3% 7.8% 4.8% Azerbaijan - Samur 6.5% 2.5% 0.0% 14.2% Russia - Samur 93.5% 97.5% 100.0% 85.8% Nicaragua - San Juan 69.9% 88.5% 54.0% 69.8% Argentina - San Martin 12.2% 57.9% N.A. N.A. Chile - San Martin 87.8% 42.1% N.A. N.A. Cameroon - Sanaga 99.0% 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% Central African Republic - Sanaga 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Nigeria - Sanaga 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 0.0% Belize - Sarstun 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Sarstun 93.4% 99.4% 100.0% N.A. Ivory Coast - Sassandra 87.7% 93.5% 77.4% 100.0% Indonesia - Sembakung 52.9% 18.5% 83.5% 100.0% Malaysia - Sembakung 47.1% 81.5% 16.5% 0.0% Argentina - Seno Union/Serrano 10.3% 1.1% 0.0% N.A. Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-17 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Chile - Seno Union/Serrano 89.7% 98.9% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - St. John (Africa) 16.9% 21.1% 27.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. John (Africa) 83.0% 78.9% 73.0% 100.0% Liberia - St. Paul 55.5% 44.9% 63.7% 100.0% Bulgaria - Struma 58.2% 63.4% 81.3% 52.6% China - Sujfun 64.7% 60.0% 64.3% 60.2% Russia - Sujfun 35.3% 40.0% 35.7% 39.8% Azerbaijan - Sulak 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Georgia - Sulak 7.3% 0.2% 25.6% 0.0% Russia - Sulak 92.4% 99.7% 74.4% 100.0% Morocco - Tafna 25.4% 39.1% 0.0% 41.2% Indonesia - Tami 97.6% 97.8% 95.6% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tami 2.4% 2.2% 4.4% 0.0% Ghana - Tano 89.1% 94.1% 68.5% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Tano 10.9% 5.9% 31.5% 100.0% Afghanistan - Tarim 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Tarim 97.2% 99.8% 58.4% 99.5% Kyrgyzstan - Tarim 2.0% 0.1% 39.0% 0.5% Pakistan - Tarim 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% Tajikistan - Tarim 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Belize - Temash 85.0% 50.3% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Temash 15.0% 49.7% N.A. N.A. Georgia - Terek 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Terek 95.3% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% Lesotho - Thukela 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% South Africa - Thukela 99.7% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-18 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Finland - Tuloma 7.9% 0.0% 15.7% N.A. Russia - Tuloma 92.1% 100.0% 84.3% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Utamboni 40.9% 69.9% 43.9% N.A. Gabon - Utamboni 59.1% 30.1% 56.1% N.A. Argentina - Valdivia 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Valdivia 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Bulgaria - Velaka 94.4% 95.0% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Velaka 5.6% 5.0% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Venta 64.9% 34.3% 53.5% N.A. Lithuania - Venta 35.1% 65.7% 46.5% N.A. Israel - Wadi Al Izziyah 32.2% 26.2% 100.0% 37.2% Lebanon - Wadi Al Izziyah 67.8% 73.8% 0.0% 62.8% Denmark - Wiedau 85.0% 88.4% N.A. 100.0% Germany - Wiedau 15.0% 11.6% N.A. 0.0% Argentina - Yelcho 62.2% 82.5% 42.0% 100.0% Chile - Yelcho 37.8% 17.5% 58.0% 0.0% Argentina - Zapaleri 19.8% 2.4% 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Zapaleri 21.7% 19.5% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Zapaleri 58.5% 78.1% 0.0% N.A. Appendix 8 - CBUs at risk in 2030 under Wettest climate scenario A8-19 Figure A8-1. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience high increases in runoff variability for 2030. A8-20 Figure A8-2. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience moderate increases in runoff variability for 2030. A8-21 Figure A8-3. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience little or no increase in runoff variability for 2030. A8-22 Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario The data in this appendix are organized by risk levels as diagrammed in Figure 8 of the main text. Country-basin units are listed alphabetically in each category of combined vulnerability and hazard. In addition, the relative importance of the basin in several dimensions appear to the right of each CBU. The percentages listed are the proportions of the basin that the CBU contributes to the basin total for each variable (area from TFDD; population from Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008; runoff from Fekete, Vorosmarty and Grabs 2000; irrigated area from Doll and Siebert 2001). CBUs marked with a "**" had a high present hazard level. CBUs marked with a "*" had a medium present hazard level. CBUs with no asterisks had a low present hazard level. Figures A9-1, A9-2 and A9-3 show the hazard-vulnerability combinations used in the main text. High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Turkey - Asi/Orontes* Venezuela - Amazon Mongolia - Amur* High Hazard 49.9% 31.3% 54.7% 46.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 9.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% Pakistan - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* Dominican Republic - 0.2% 0.2% N.A. 0.0% Artibonite* 27.2% 10.0% 45.3% 19.2% Mexico - Colorado* 1.6% 5.4% 0.0% 14.4% Iran - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* United States of America - * 99.8% 99.8% N.A. 100.0% Haiti - Artibonite* 72.8% 90.0% 54.7% 80.8% Colorado* 98.4% 94.6% 100.0% 85.6% Sudan - Baraka* 37.3% 9.3% N.A. 80.9% Guatemala - Candelaria* 14.5% 3.3% 0.0% N.A. Canada - Firth* 59.6% N.A. 0.0% N.A. Belize - Belize 61.9% 51.5% 83.5% 100.0% Mexico - Candelaria* 85.5% 96.7% 100.0% N.A. South Africa - Incomati* 62.3% 73.5% 100.0% 57.8% Guatemala - Belize Bolivia - Lake Titicaca- 38.1% 48.5% 16.5% 0.0% Guinea - Gambia* 18.9% 29.3% 29.7% 26.9% Poopo System* 56.4% 49.9% 44.1% 81.6% Ivory Coast - Bia* Chile - Lake Titicaca- 41.1% 39.6% 62.6% 100.0% Iran - Helmand* 15.5% 12.5% 0.3% 25.3% Poopo System** 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Cavally 54.6% 71.1% 45.3% 92.2% Guatemala - Hondo* 29.8% 1.8% 51.5% 0.0% China - Ob* 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.5% Liberia - Cavally 41.2% 20.1% 49.1% 7.8% Mexico - Hondo* 57.2% 91.3% 40.7% 97.7% Mongolia - Ob** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Liberia - Cestos 84.5% 40.8% 75.7% 100.0% China - Ili/Kunes He* 34.3% 51.0% 10.7% 27.2% Mongolia - Pu Lun T'o* 12.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% Costa Rica - Changuinola Kyrgyzstan - Ili/Kunes 7.2% 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% He* 5.5% 1.0% 24.5% 5.1% Greece - Struma* 26.2% 22.3% 18.7% 31.3% Panama - Changuinola Turkey - Tigris- 92.8% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% Uganda - Lake Turkana* 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 24.8% 21.7% 53.3% 14.8% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-1 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Nicaragua - Choluteca* 3.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% El Salvador - Lempa* 56.5% 85.0% 38.7% 92.4% Mexico - Tijuana* 73.3% 95.8% N.A. 84.0% Honduras - United States of America - Coco/Segovia* 24.3% 7.4% 43.4% 7.3% Guatemala - Lempa* 14.0% 7.3% 36.0% 6.9% Tijuana* 26.7% 4.2% N.A. 16.0% Nicaragua - South Africa - Coco/Segovia* 75.7% 92.6% 56.6% 92.7% Honduras - Lempa* 29.5% 7.7% 25.3% 0.7% Umbeluzi** 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Algeria - Daoura** Dominican Republic - 47.3% 1.2% N.A. 0.0% Massacre* 45.7% 23.0% 0.0% 61.1% Iran - Dasht** 21.5% 4.4% N.A. 3.0% Haiti - Massacre* 54.3% 77.0% 100.0% 38.9% Morocco - Dra* Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 78.6% 99.7% 100.0% 96.0% Nile* 0.7% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% Algeria - Dra** 21.4% 0.3% 0.0% 4.0% El Salvador - Paz* 45.8% 71.0% N.A. 76.0% Russia - Elancik* 73.0% 56.6% N.A. 0.0% Bulgaria - Rezvaya* 18.4% 2.3% N.A. N.A. Venezuela - Essequibo 21.9% 12.6% 12.7% 0.0% Turkey - Rezvaya* 81.6% 97.7% N.A. N.A. El Salvador - Goascoran* 47.7% 71.9% 51.1% 0.0% Costa Rica - Sixaola 81.5% 74.4% 100.0% N.A. Honduras - Goascoran* 52.3% 28.1% 48.9% 100.0% Panama - Sixaola 18.5% 25.6% 0.0% N.A. Algeria - Guir** 77.5% 83.5% N.A. 85.5% Mexico - Yaqui** 94.1% 94.8% 100.0% 97.7% Turkmenistan - Hari/Harirud* 17.4% 6.2% 0.0% 21.7% Belize - Hondo* 13.0% 6.9% 7.8% 2.3% Ghana - Komoe* 2.9% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Afghanistan - Kowl E Namaksar* 28.8% 6.6% 0.0% 3.0% Georgia - Kura-Araks* 17.7% 19.0% 33.5% 22.3% Indonesia - Loes* 16.3% 6.6% N.A. 0.0% Greece - Maritsa* 7.6% 3.1% 4.0% 11.8% Honduras - Motaqua* 11.5% 3.6% 8.7% 0.0% Turkey - Nahr El Kebir* 13.6% 6.5% N.A. 0.0% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-2 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Honduras - Negro* 10.7% 24.3% 59.4% 0.5% Brazil - Oiapoque/Oyupock 40.2% 74.6% 34.0% N.A. Brazil - Orinoco 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Venezuela - Orinoco 65.2% 83.4% 63.8% 57.5% Morocco - Oued Bon Naima** 63.4% 66.2% N.A. 84.8% Kenya - Pangani* 2.6% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Mozambique - Pungwe* 94.3% 92.8% 77.0% 100.0% Costa Rica - San Juan 30.1% 11.5% 46.0% 30.2% Ukraine - Sarata* 63.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Song Vam Co Dong 49.2% 38.6% 36.5% 19.2% Vietnam - Song Vam Co Dong 50.8% 61.4% 63.5% 80.8% Afghanistan - Tarim* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kyrgyzstan - Tarim* 2.0% 0.1% 39.0% 0.5% Indonesia - Tjeroaka- Wanggoe* 62.4% 97.9% 45.0% N.A. Papua New Guinea - Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 37.6% 2.1% 55.0% N.A. Guyana - Amacuro* Brazil - Amazon China - Amur* Moderate Hazard 13.1% 85.0% 0.0% N.A. 62.4% 31.4% 76.0% 3.6% 42.6% 94.4% 26.6% 83.4% Venezuela - Amacuro* 86.9% 15.0% 100.0% N.A. Colombia - Amazon 6.3% 3.5% 11.7% 5.7% Kyrgyzstan - Aral Sea* 9.1% 5.8% 23.4% 4.2% Western Sahara - Atui** United States of America - 35.4% 13.2% N.A. N.A. Guyana - Amazon 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Columbia 84.7% 93.9% 69.0% 96.1% Brunei - Bangau Lebanon - An Nahr Al Bosnia and Herzegovina - 54.4% 23.0% N.A. N.A. Kabir* 32.6% 38.4% 100.0% 60.6% Danube 4.9% 4.7% 10.0% 0.2% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-3 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Eritrea - Baraka* 62.7% 90.7% N.A. 19.1% Syria - An Nahr Al Kabir* 67.4% 61.6% 0.0% 39.4% Montenegro - Danube 0.9% 0.3% 3.0% 0.0% Guyana - Barima* 52.2% 99.3% 100.0% N.A. Lebanon - Asi/Orontes* 5.8% 3.1% 3.0% 4.8% Bulgaria - Danube* 5.2% 4.0% 7.0% 4.7% Vietnam - Bei Jiang/Hsi* 2.4% 1.1% 2.7% 0.4% Syria - Asi/Orontes* 44.3% 65.6% 42.3% 49.0% Croatia - Danube* 4.5% 3.9% 7.9% 0.0% Ghana - Bia* 58.9% 60.4% 37.4% 0.0% Angola - Congo/Zaire* 7.9% 1.9% 7.6% 0.0% Moldova - Danube* 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 2.5% Mozambique - Buzi* 88.7% 76.3% 86.3% 52.2% Zambia - Congo/Zaire* 4.8% 2.8% 6.0% 0.5% Poland - Danube* 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Buzi* 11.3% 23.7% 13.7% 47.8% Guinea - Corubal* 72.9% 88.7% 66.2% 0.0% Serbia - Danube* 9.4% 10.0% 4.7% 1.0% Colombia - Catatumbo* 63.3% 73.0% 62.2% 82.4% Switzerland - Danube 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Portugal - Douro/Duero* 18.2% 50.4% 38.3% 22.1% Venezuela - Catatumbo* 36.7% 27.0% 37.8% 17.6% Russia - Dnieper 17.8% 11.2% 22.8% 1.2% Spain - Douro/Duero* 81.8% 49.6% 61.7% 77.9% Guinea - Cavally* 4.2% 8.8% 5.6% 0.0% Ukraine - Dnieper* 58.0% 69.1% 40.1% 96.5% Canada - Fraser 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 99.4% Guinea - Cestos* United States of America - 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Moldova - Dniester* 24.6% 36.6% 2.2% 56.4% Fraser 0.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% Honduras - Chamelecon* 97.2% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Ukraine - Dniester* 75.3% 63.4% 97.8% 43.6% Gambia, The - Gambia* 8.5% 28.5% 12.5% 68.8% Honduras - Choluteca* 96.6% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Guinea - Geba* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Senegal - Gambia* 72.6% 42.3% 57.8% 4.3% Malawi - Congo/Zaire* India - Ganges- 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Senegal - Geba* 32.2% 35.1% 20.9% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 62.3% 75.2% 58.1% 83.4% Georgia - Coruh 8.9% 20.5% 11.7% 0.0% Afghanistan - Helmand* 81.5% 85.8% 98.3% 74.3% Spain - Garonne* 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Turkey - Coruh* Kazakhstan - Ili/Kunes 91.1% 79.5% 88.3% 100.0% He* 60.2% 48.0% 64.8% 67.7% Portugal - Guadiana* 18.9% 17.4% 38.8% 11.8% Morocco - Daoura** 52.7% 98.8% N.A. 100.0% Afghanistan - Indus* 6.3% 4.6% 9.6% 1.3% Spain - Guadiana* 81.1% 82.6% 61.2% 88.2% Ukraine - Don* 12.8% 33.6% 17.4% 49.9% Italy - Isonzo 39.1% 68.5% 46.4% 41.2% Swaziland - Incomati* 6.3% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0% Serbia - Drin* 28.8% 46.3% 37.1% 26.1% Slovenia - Isonzo 60.9% 31.5% 53.6% 58.8% Israel - Jordan* 27.0% 4.2% 42.5% 31.3% Ukraine - Elancik* 27.0% 43.4% N.A. 100.0% Ethiopia - Juba-Shibeli* 45.7% 66.5% 66.8% 48.1% Jordan - Jordan* 57.1% 83.4% 20.6% 43.2% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-4 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Brazil - Essequibo* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Somalia - Juba-Shibeli** 27.5% 19.6% 1.6% 48.1% Lebanon - Jordan* 2.1% 1.0% 26.9% 2.3% Ireland - Flurry 48.2% 68.9% N.A. N.A. Sweden - Klaralven 84.8% 97.6% 82.0% 70.0% Syria - Jordan* 13.3% 11.5% 10.0% 23.2% United Kingdom - Flurry 51.8% 31.1% N.A. N.A. Greece - Lake Prespa* 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0% Angola - Kunene* 86.7% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% Ireland - Foyle 31.6% 20.4% 50.0% N.A. Kenya - Lake Turkana* 43.3% 17.7% 20.4% 14.9% Brazil - Lagoon Mirim* 43.2% 53.8% 43.9% 65.8% Myanmar (Burma) - Ganges-Brahmaputra- Peru - Lake Titicaca- Meghna 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Botswana - Limpopo* 19.6% 8.1% 0.0% 6.0% Poopo System* 42.9% 50.1% 55.9% 18.4% Belize - Grijalva 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bulgaria - Maritsa* 66.5% 67.3% 58.1% 67.2% Portugal - Lima* 48.2% 66.5% 100.0% 74.7% Morocco - Guir** 22.5% 16.5% N.A. 14.5% Turkey - Maritsa* 25.9% 29.5% 37.9% 21.0% Spain - Lima* 51.8% 33.5% 0.0% 25.3% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Han* 28.7% 4.4% 39.6% 30.9% China - Mekong 21.8% 10.2% 18.6% 26.8% Mozambique - Limpopo* 21.0% 7.5% 0.0% 47.9% South Korea - Han* Myanmar (Burma) - 71.3% 95.6% 60.4% 69.1% Mekong* 3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 2.8% Mozambique - Maputo* 5.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% Russia - Har Us Nur* 3.0% 2.4% 2.1% 0.0% Nigeria - Oueme* 16.4% 17.9% 8.7% 10.6% South Africa - Maputo* 60.1% 39.4% 70.1% 36.8% China - Irrawaddy 4.6% 4.2% 9.1% 7.7% Guatemala - Paz* 54.2% 29.0% N.A. 24.0% Swaziland - Maputo* 34.9% 59.7% 29.9% 62.4% Moldova - Kogilnik* 57.1% 82.1% 89.7% 100.0% Mozambique - Ruvuma* 65.2% 26.4% 71.8% 75.6% Portugal - Mino* 4.2% 5.6% 0.0% 13.3% Ukraine - Kogilnik* 42.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% Guinea - Senegal* 7.1% 14.7% 40.7% 1.2% Spain - Mino* 95.8% 94.4% 100.0% 86.7% Burkina Faso - Komoe* 21.7% 21.3% 20.2% 39.5% Kazakhstan - Shu/Chu* 93.0% 27.3% 92.5% 87.0% Canada - Mississippi* 1.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Ivory Coast - Komoe* United States of America - 74.6% 67.6% 79.8% 60.5% Kazakhstan - Talas* 79.3% 74.9% 31.4% 78.8% Mississippi* 98.4% 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Korea, Democratic Krka People's Republic of Canada - Nelson- 12.8% 3.2% N.A. N.A. (North) - Tumen* 28.6% 29.6% 49.9% 32.4% Saskatchewan 85.9% 87.6% 87.4% 94.3% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-5 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Croatia - Krka United States of America - 87.2% 96.8% N.A. N.A. Russia - Tumen* 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Nelson-Saskatchewan* 14.1% 12.4% 12.6% 5.7% Turkey - Kura-Araks* 14.3% 7.0% 29.8% 12.4% Greece - Vardar* 12.0% 4.9% 0.0% 19.9% Germany - Oder/Odra* 6.2% 4.1% 4.0% 24.3% Kenya - Lake Natron* 33.0% 39.8% 27.0% 0.0% Macedonia - Vardar* 63.5% 52.9% 75.1% 70.1% Angola - Okavango* 21.2% 34.1% 92.0% 63.1% Tanzania, United Republic of - Lake Natron* 67.0% 60.2% 73.0% 100.0% Serbia - Vardar* 24.5% 42.2% 24.9% 10.0% Lesotho - Orange* 2.1% 12.8% 37.5% 0.7% Timor Leste - Loes* 83.7% 93.4% N.A. 100.0% Greece - Vijose* 35.5% 6.2% 44.7% 14.5% South Africa - Orange* 59.7% 84.3% 62.5% 60.1% Algeria - Medjerda* 33.3% 33.0% 22.3% 9.8% Slovakia - Vistula/Wista* 1.0% 0.9% 3.1% 0.3% Botswana - Orange** 12.9% 1.3% 0.0% 3.3% Tunisia - Medjerda* 66.7% 67.0% 77.7% 90.2% Ghana - Volta* 40.2% 37.0% 47.3% 60.6% Namibia - Orange** 25.4% 1.6% 0.0% 35.9% Russia - Mius* Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 70.4% 75.8% 0.0% 0.0% Zambezi* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Austria - Rhine 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Ukraine - Mius* United States of America - Rio Grande (North 29.6% 24.2% 100.0% 100.0% Guinea-Bissau - Corubal* 27.1% 11.3% 33.8% 100.0% America)* 51.8% 24.6% 49.9% 31.5% Belize - Moho 76.1% 74.6% N.A. N.A. Guinea-Bissau - Gambia* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mali - Senegal* 34.6% 36.5% 49.0% 13.1% Guatemala - Moho 23.9% 25.4% N.A. N.A. Guinea-Bissau - Geba* 67.4% 64.6% 79.1% 100.0% Senegal - Senegal* 8.1% 16.4% 8.3% 22.9% Guatemala - Motaqua 88.5% 96.4% 91.3% 100.0% Canada - Skagit 11.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Turkmenistan - Murgab* United States of America - 40.2% 33.7% 10.0% 82.0% Skagit 88.3% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% Nicaragua - Negro* United States of America - 89.3% 75.7% 40.6% 99.5% St. Lawrence 47.0% 60.6% 44.5% 69.2% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Neretva 96.5% 96.9% 100.0% 97.5% Macedonia - Struma* 11.7% 13.5% 0.0% 16.1% Bulgaria - Nestos* 53.4% 61.6% 54.9% 31.8% Serbia - Struma* 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-6 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Greece - Nestos* 46.6% 38.4% 45.1% 68.2% Spain - Tagus/Tejo* 66.5% 66.1% 44.6% 57.9% French Guiana - Oiapoque/Oyupock* 59.8% 25.4% 66.0% N.A. Mozambique - Umbeluzi* 67.3% 92.6% 4.0% 20.0% Algeria - Oued Bon Naima** 36.6% 33.8% N.A. 15.2% Swaziland - Umbeluzi* 32.5% 7.4% 96.0% 80.0% Brunei - Pandaruan 58.0% 92.2% N.A. N.A. Ukraine - Vistula/Wista* 6.7% 7.9% 4.8% 0.0% Tanzania, United Republic of - Pangani* 97.4% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% Angola - Zambezi* 18.4% 1.1% 22.1% 0.0% Russia - Pu Lun T'o* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Malawi - Zambezi* 8.0% 35.2% 6.0% 3.7% Zimbabwe - Pungwe* 5.7% 7.2% 23.0% 0.0% Zambia - Zambezi* 41.6% 27.4% 54.9% 55.0% Liechtenstein - Rhine 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% 0.0% Botswana - Zambezi** 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Mozambique - Sabi* 26.1% 7.6% 9.3% 0.0% Namibia - Zambezi** 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Zimbabwe - Sabi* 73.9% 92.4% 90.7% 100.0% Vietnam - Saigon 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% China - Salween 52.4% 46.6% 45.7% 68.0% Moldova - Sarata* 37.0% 57.2% 100.0% 100.0% Belize - Sarstun 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Sarstun 93.4% 99.4% 100.0% N.A. Ivory Coast - Sassandra 87.7% 93.5% 77.4% 100.0% Bulgaria - Struma* 58.2% 63.4% 81.3% 52.6% Georgia - Sulak* 7.3% 0.2% 25.6% 0.0% Ghana - Tano* 89.1% 94.1% 68.5% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Tano* 10.9% 5.9% 31.5% 100.0% Tajikistan - Tarim* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Tarim** 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% Belize - Temash 85.0% 50.3% N.A. N.A. Georgia - Terek* 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Lesotho - Thukela* 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-7 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Saudi Arabia - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Tanzania, United Republic of - Umba* 83.1% 88.1% 12.0% 100.0% Kenya - Umba** 16.9% 11.9% 88.0% 0.0% Chile - Valdivia* 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Bulgaria - Velaka* 94.4% 95.0% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Velaka* 5.6% 5.0% N.A. N.A. Israel - Wadi Al Izziyah* 32.2% 26.2% 100.0% 37.2% Lebanon - Wadi Al Izziyah* 67.8% 73.8% 0.0% 62.8% Germany - Wiedau 15.0% 11.6% N.A. 0.0% Cameroon - Akpa Peru - Amazon Canada - Alsek Low Hazard 62.1% 40.1% 73.8% 100.0% 16.3% 35.1% 6.8% 54.1% 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Nigeria - Akpa 37.9% 59.9% 26.2% 0.0% Bolivia - Amazon* 12.0% 23.8% 4.4% 11.9% Kazakhstan - Aral Sea* 34.5% 5.2% 8.8% 31.1% French Guiana - Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Ecuador - Amazon* 2.1% 6.1% 0.6% 24.7% Tajikistan - Aral Sea* 11.0% 15.3% 22.4% 10.7% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Amur* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Suriname - Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Uzbekistan - Aral Sea* 31.1% 58.8% 9.3% 46.4% China - Aral Sea* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Amur 48.2% 5.3% 72.8% 16.0% Canada - Chilkat 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Azerbaijan - Astara Chay* United States of America - 17.4% 27.1% N.A. 0.0% Afghanistan - Aral Sea* 8.5% 12.1% 34.3% 2.8% Chilkat 50.5% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Iran - Astara Chay* 82.6% 72.9% N.A. 100.0% Turkmenistan - Aral Sea* 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 4.8% Canada - Columbia 15.3% 6.1% 31.0% 3.9% Mauritania - Atui** Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 64.6% 86.8% N.A. N.A. Iran - Atrak* 68.9% 95.0% 97.1% 95.8% Congo/Zaire 62.4% 75.4% 66.5% 96.8% Argentina - Aviles* 88.8% 94.1% N.A. N.A. Turkmenistan - Atrak* 31.1% 5.0% 2.9% 4.2% Austria - Danube 10.3% 9.4% 26.5% 5.7% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-8 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Chile - Aviles* 11.2% 5.9% N.A. N.A. France - Bidasoa 12.5% 22.5% N.A. N.A. Germany - Danube 7.5% 11.9% 10.7% 0.8% Ethiopia - Awash* 92.7% 99.5% 100.0% 99.7% Spain - Bidasoa 87.5% 77.5% N.A. N.A. Romania - Danube 29.0% 26.8% 12.2% 63.6% Djibouti - Awash** 7.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Ecuador - Chira** 38.1% 27.4% 59.7% 30.4% Slovakia - Danube 5.8% 6.3% 4.4% 7.5% Somalia - Awash** 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% Peru - Chira** 61.9% 72.6% 40.3% 69.6% Slovenia - Danube 2.2% 2.2% 6.2% 0.3% Argentina - Aysen Guatemala - Coatan Czech Republic - 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% N.A. Achute* 12.6% 17.4% N.A. 0.0% Danube* 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 1.0% Chile - Aysen 95.9% 99.9% 100.0% N.A. Mexico - Coatan Achute* 87.4% 82.6% N.A. 100.0% Hungary - Danube* 11.7% 12.2% 1.9% 7.8% Argentina - Baker* 31.6% 26.9% 26.3% 9.6% Cameroon - Congo/Zaire 2.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% Ukraine - Danube* 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 4.9% Chile - Baker* Central African Republic - 68.4% 73.1% 73.7% 90.4% Congo/Zaire 10.9% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% Poland - Elbe 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Malaysia - Bangau Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - 45.6% 77.0% N.A. N.A. Congo/Zaire 6.7% 2.5% 8.0% 0.0% Czech Republic - Elbe* 36.1% 25.9% 38.4% 37.5% Ireland - Bann 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Burundi - Congo/Zaire* 0.4% 4.6% 0.2% 0.5% Germany - Elbe* 62.7% 73.2% 61.6% 62.5% United Kingdom - Bann United States of America - 97.1% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% Rwanda - Congo/Zaire* 0.1% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% Firth* 40.4% N.A. 100.0% N.A. Venezuela - Barima* Tanzania, United Republic of - Bangladesh - Ganges- 47.8% 0.7% 0.0% N.A. Congo/Zaire* 4.5% 5.9% 1.9% 2.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 6.6% 19.6% 8.0% 9.7% Latvia - Barta Nepal - Ganges- 61.8% 39.7% 100.0% N.A. Argentina - Cullen* 17.1% 9.9% 0.0% N.A. Brahmaputra-Meghna 9.0% 4.6% 11.9% 3.6% Lithuania - Barta 38.2% 60.3% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Cullen* 82.9% 90.1% 100.0% N.A. France - Garonne 98.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% China - Bei Jiang/Hsi 97.6% 98.9% 97.3% 99.6% Albania - Danube 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Har Us Nur* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Beilun* 84.0% 69.2% 100.0% 95.8% Italy - Danube 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mongolia - Har Us Nur* 96.8% 97.6% 97.9% 100.0% Vietnam - Beilun* 16.0% 30.8% 0.0% 4.2% Byelarus - Daugava 48.3% 64.7% 57.1% 100.0% Mozambique - Incomati** 31.3% 18.1% 0.0% 36.2% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-9 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Cameroon - Benito/Ntem 42.0% 52.3% 31.2% N.A. Latvia - Daugava 34.3% 29.8% 29.1% 0.0% India - Indus* 33.7% 35.0% 61.3% 38.6% Equatorial Guinea - Benito/Ntem 34.1% 35.8% 53.9% N.A. Russia - Daugava 16.1% 4.5% 13.8% 0.0% Pakistan - Indus* 52.5% 60.4% 10.1% 60.1% Gabon - Benito/Ntem 23.9% 11.9% 15.0% N.A. Lithuania - Daugava* 1.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% Namibia - Kunene** 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ca/Song- Koi 35.2% 4.3% 51.0% 9.1% Byelarus - Dnieper 24.1% 19.7% 37.2% 2.3% Argentina - La Plata* 27.7% 16.5% 11.2% 40.8% Vietnam - Ca/Song-Koi 64.8% 95.7% 49.0% 90.9% Poland - Dniester* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Brazil - La Plata* 46.7% 70.2% 71.7% 29.5% Bolivia - Cancoso/Lauca** 85.8% 96.2% 70.0% 100.0% Albania - Drin* 45.6% 37.5% 56.5% 60.2% Paraguay - La Plata* 13.5% 9.8% 8.7% 24.6% Chile - Cancoso/Lauca** 14.2% 3.8% 30.0% 0.0% Macedonia - Drin* 13.2% 8.8% 6.4% 10.5% Uruguay - La Plata* 3.8% 1.1% 5.5% 2.8% Argentina - Carmen Silva/Chico* 59.2% 97.2% 100.0% N.A. France - Ebro 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% Uruguay - Lagoon Mirim* 56.8% 46.2% 56.1% 34.2% Chile - Carmen Silva/Chico* 40.8% 2.8% 0.0% N.A. Spain - Ebro 99.2% 97.8% 100.0% 99.7% South Africa - Limpopo* 44.3% 78.8% 91.3% 38.7% Ireland - Castletown Cambodia (Kampuchea) - 16.9% 40.7% 0.0% N.A. Indonesia - Fly 6.7% 0.9% 0.0% N.A. Mekong 20.1% 19.4% 20.0% 16.8% United Kingdom - Castletown Laos, People's Democratic 83.1% 59.3% 100.0% N.A. Papua New Guinea - Fly 93.3% 99.1% 100.0% N.A. Republic of - Mekong 25.1% 10.0% 36.4% 12.1% Ivory Coast - Cestos* Bhutan - Ganges- 15.3% 59.1% 24.3% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% 0.2% Thailand - Mekong 24.6% 41.3% 16.1% 26.8% Guatemala - Chamelecon* 2.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Eritrea - Gash** 53.6% 44.8% 58.0% 10.0% Vietnam - Mekong 4.8% 18.0% 6.7% 14.8% Angola - Chiloango* 32.5% 5.7% 30.3% N.A. Sudan - Gash** 23.9% 25.2% 0.0% 85.0% Cameroon - Niger 4.2% 4.2% 11.4% 5.6% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-10 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Chiloango* 64.7% 92.7% 69.7% N.A. Norway - Glama 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Guinea - Niger 4.5% 2.3% 14.8% 0.8% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Chiloango* 2.8% 1.5% 0.0% N.A. Sweden - Glama 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Nigeria - Niger 26.6% 66.4% 59.8% 15.6% Panama - Chiriqui 96.1% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Guinea - Great Scarcies 74.7% 59.8% 48.6% 79.1% Benin - Niger* 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% 0.6% Argentina - Comau Sierra Leone - Great 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Scarcies 25.3% 40.2% 51.4% 20.9% Burkina Faso - Niger* 3.9% 3.0% 1.0% 0.7% Chile - Comau 88.9% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Guatemala - Grijalva 38.3% 37.7% 43.7% 3.5% Chad - Niger* 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% Gabon - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Grijalva* 61.6% 62.3% 56.3% 96.5% Ivory Coast - Niger* 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.1% Sudan - Congo/Zaire* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Egypt - Jordan** 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mali - Niger* 25.6% 9.6% 5.9% 59.4% Uganda - Congo/Zaire** 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Kenya - Juba-Shibeli* 26.8% 14.0% 31.5% 3.9% Niger - Niger** 23.6% 11.6% 0.8% 17.2% Brazil - Corantijn/Courantyne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Finland - Kemi* 94.4% 96.9% 96.3% N.A. Burundi - Nile* 0.4% 2.8% 0.8% 0.0% Guyana - Corantijn/Courantyne* 52.0% 40.1% 38.9% N.A. Russia - Kemi* 5.6% 3.1% 3.7% N.A. Kenya - Nile* 1.7% 8.3% 6.0% 0.0% Suriname - Corantijn/Courantyne* 47.9% 59.9% 61.1% N.A. Norway - Klaralven 15.2% 2.4% 18.0% 30.0% Rwanda - Nile* 0.7% 4.6% 1.8% 0.1% Costa Rica - Corredores/Colorado 95.4% 90.1% 100.0% 100.0% Armenia - Kura-Araks* 15.3% 22.9% 7.7% 9.0% Sudan - Nile* 63.6% 18.9% 38.2% 77.4% Cameroon - Cross Tanzania, United 23.7% 5.6% 36.5% 0.0% Azerbaijan - Kura-Araks* 32.0% 34.6% 12.2% 40.2% Republic of - Nile* 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% 0.0% Nigeria - Cross 76.3% 94.4% 63.5% 100.0% Iran - Kura-Araks* 20.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% Uganda - Nile* 7.9% 17.1% 6.9% 0.4% Angola - Cuvelai/Etosha* 31.8% 16.1% 76.4% 0.0% Bolivia - La Plata* 8.3% 2.3% 2.9% 2.4% Egypt - Nile** 9.2% 25.6% 0.0% 19.3% Namibia - Czech Republic - Cuvelai/Etosha* 68.2% 83.9% 23.6% 100.0% Cameroon - Lake Chad* 2.0% 6.1% 12.9% 12.7% Oder/Odra 8.4% 10.9% 6.5% 0.0% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-11 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Pakistan - Dasht** Central African Republic - 78.5% 95.6% N.A. 97.0% Lake Chad* 9.1% 2.8% 24.4% 0.0% Poland - Oder/Odra* 84.2% 84.4% 89.5% 75.4% Russia - Don 87.2% 66.4% 82.6% 50.1% Chad - Lake Chad* 45.7% 22.2% 38.0% 32.7% Slovakia - Oder/Odra* 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% Montenegro - Drin 12.3% 7.4% 0.0% 3.2% Nigeria - Lake Chad* 7.5% 56.5% 19.5% 26.3% Namibia - Okavango* 24.9% 21.8% 0.7% 27.0% Andorra - Ebro* 0.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% Niger - Lake Chad** 28.2% 5.7% 0.4% 23.8% Botswana - Okavango** 50.7% 30.2% 7.1% 9.9% Austria - Elbe* 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Albania - Lake Prespa* 88.1% 97.9% 100.0% 94.3% Norway - Pasvik 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% N.A. Ireland - Erne 57.5% 56.6% 100.0% N.A. Macedonia - Lake Prespa* 8.6% 1.8% 0.0% 4.7% Russia - Pasvik 16.5% 50.9% 0.0% N.A. United Kingdom - Erne 42.5% 43.4% 0.0% N.A. Ethiopia - Lake Turkana* 54.8% 81.9% 79.4% 85.1% Finland - Pasvik* 77.2% 41.6% 100.0% N.A. Guyana - Essequibo* 67.9% 83.1% 81.2% 66.8% Russia - Lava/Pregel 75.3% 84.5% 78.8% 0.0% Italy - Po 94.5% 98.1% 97.9% 99.5% Suriname - Essequibo* 10.1% 4.3% 6.1% 33.2% Poland - Lava/Pregel* 24.7% 15.5% 21.2% 100.0% Switzerland - Po 5.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% Ireland - Fane 86.0% 84.1% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Lielupe 66.5% 67.2% 65.9% N.A. China - Pu Lun T'o* 87.5% 97.9% 100.0% 98.0% United Kingdom - Fane 14.0% 15.9% N.A. N.A. Lithuania - Lielupe 33.5% 32.8% 34.1% N.A. Switzerland - Rhine 14.1% 11.2% 31.5% 24.6% Bangladesh - Fenney* 34.3% 75.6% 0.0% 47.9% Zimbabwe - Limpopo** 15.1% 5.5% 8.7% 7.4% Belgium - Rhine* 8.0% 5.3% 6.0% 5.1% India - Fenney* 65.7% 24.4% 100.0% 52.1% Liberia - Mana-Morro 83.4% 77.8% 100.0% N.A. France - Rhine* 13.3% 7.3% 11.7% 8.3% United Kingdom - Foyle Sierra Leone - Mana- 68.4% 79.6% 50.0% N.A. Morro 16.6% 22.2% 0.0% N.A. Germany - Rhine* 56.6% 66.1% 41.4% 36.5% Argentina - Gallegos/Chico* 60.7% 81.9% 0.0% N.A. French Guiana - Maroni* 41.8% 54.7% 34.9% 100.0% Luxembourg - Rhine* 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% Chile - Gallegos/Chico* 39.3% 18.1% 100.0% N.A. Suriname - Maroni* 58.0% 45.3% 65.1% 0.0% Netherlands - Rhine* 5.7% 8.6% 2.1% 25.5% China - Ganges- Brahmaputra-Meghna 19.7% 0.3% 18.6% 3.0% Guinea - Moa 39.3% 37.5% 39.9% N.A. France - Rhone 89.6% 85.0% 76.7% 77.9% Andorra - Garonne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Sierra Leone - Moa 47.6% 55.0% 60.1% N.A. Switzerland - Rhone 10.2% 15.0% 23.3% 22.1% Ethiopia - Gash** Mexico - Rio Grande 22.5% 30.0% 42.0% 5.0% Finland - Naatamo 41.3% 0.0% N.A. N.A. (North America)* 48.2% 75.4% 50.1% 68.5% Estonia - Gauja 9.6% 2.2% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Naatamo 58.7% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Mauritania - Senegal** 50.3% 32.4% 2.0% 62.8% Latvia - Gauja 90.4% 97.8% 100.0% N.A. Byelarus - Narva 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% N.A. Canada - St. Croix* 35.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-12 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Malaysia - Golok United States of America - 43.6% 30.2% N.A. 10.9% Estonia - Narva 33.8% 33.6% 43.0% N.A. St. Croix* 64.9% 48.6% 100.0% 100.0% Thailand - Golok Canada - St. John (North 56.4% 69.8% N.A. 89.1% Latvia - Narva 11.1% 13.9% 15.6% N.A. America) 63.5% 82.1% 59.9% 0.0% Afghanistan - Hari/Harirud* United States of America - 44.3% 37.5% 68.3% 14.4% Russia - Narva 53.4% 52.1% 41.4% N.A. St. John (North America)* 36.5% 17.9% 40.1% 100.0% Iran - Hari/Harirud* 38.3% 56.4% 31.7% 63.9% Byelarus - Neman 46.4% 44.3% 46.1% 98.4% Canada - St. Lawrence 53.0% 39.4% 55.5% 30.8% Pakistan - Helmand* 3.0% 1.7% 1.4% 0.4% Lithuania - Neman 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 0.0% Canada - Stikine 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. China - Indus* United States of America - 7.5% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% Russia - Neman 5.3% 2.9% 6.3% 0.0% Stikine 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. India - Irrawaddy 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 2.7% Latvia - Neman* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Tagus/Tejo* 33.5% 33.9% 55.4% 42.1% Myanmar (Burma) - Irrawaddy 91.6% 92.7% 88.7% 89.6% Poland - Neman* 4.2% 3.6% 5.2% 1.6% Canada - Taku 90.2% 57.1% 100.0% N.A. Norway - Jacobs United States of America - 68.3% 91.1% 100.0% N.A. Ethiopia - Nile 11.8% 16.4% 41.4% 2.8% Taku 9.8% 42.9% 0.0% N.A. Russia - Jacobs Central African Republic - Iraq - Tigris- 31.7% 8.9% 0.0% N.A. Nile* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 40.5% 45.0% 19.1% 55.2% Mongolia - Sweden - Jenisej/Yenisey 12.8% 23.5% 2.9% 3.2% Eritrea - Nile** 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Torne/Tornealven 67.7% 62.6% 30.5% N.A. Russia - Jenisej/Yenisey 87.2% 76.5% 97.1% 96.8% Russia - Ob 74.3% 76.7% 90.8% 12.4% Canada - Whiting 76.9% N.A. N.A. N.A. Panama - Jurado United States of America - 29.4% 33.4% N.A. N.A. Kazakhstan - Ob* 25.2% 22.8% 9.2% 86.1% Whiting 23.1% N.A. N.A. N.A. India - Kaladan 24.2% 20.4% 29.2% 67.1% Russia - Olanga 89.5% 63.2% 87.4% N.A. Canada - Yukon 39.8% 22.9% 37.0% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - United States of America - Kaladan 75.8% 79.6% 70.8% 32.9% Finland - Olanga* 10.5% 36.8% 12.6% N.A. Yukon* 60.2% 77.1% 63.0% 100.0% Bangladesh - Karnaphuli 59.0% 86.7% 43.3% 74.9% Benin - Oueme* 82.9% 81.8% 91.3% 89.4% Mozambique - Zambezi* 11.8% 7.6% 6.8% 17.2% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-13 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area India - Karnaphuli Tanzania, United 40.8% 13.3% 56.7% 25.1% France - Po* 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Republic of - Zambezi* 2.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.2% Mali - Komoe* 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Italy - Rhine 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Zambezi* 15.5% 23.7% 8.2% 23.7% Iran - Kowl E Namaksar* 71.2% 93.4% 100.0% 97.0% France - Roia* 67.2% 34.2% N.A. 14.3% Ecuador - Zarumilla** 78.7% 71.4% N.A. 88.4% Algeria - Lake Chad** 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Italy - Roia* 32.8% 65.8% N.A. 85.7% Peru - Zarumilla** 21.3% 28.6% N.A. 11.6% Libya - Lake Chad** Tanzania, United 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Republic of - Ruvuma* 34.5% 70.8% 28.2% 24.4% Sudan - Lake Chad** 3.5% 6.7% 4.8% 4.5% Belgium - Schelde* 49.3% 56.5% 55.9% 36.8% Argentina - Lake Fagnano* 85.0% 100.0% N.A. N.A. France - Schelde* 50.2% 43.4% 44.1% 62.5% Chile - Lake Fagnano* 15.0% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Netherlands - Schelde* 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% Sudan - Lake Turkana** 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Belgium - Seine* 2.2% 0.8% 7.0% 0.8% Mongolia - Lake Ubsa- Nur* 75.9% 78.7% 86.6% 63.1% France - Seine* 97.7% 99.0% 93.0% 99.2% Russia - Lake Ubsa-Nur 24.1% 21.3% 13.4% 36.9% Luxembourg - Seine* 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Little Scarcies 31.0% 16.7% 30.5% 0.0% Indonesia - Sepik 3.3% 1.2% 0.0% N.A. Sierra Leone - Little Papua New Guinea - Scarcies 69.0% 83.3% 69.5% 100.0% Sepik 96.7% 98.8% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - Loffa 11.5% 33.4% 0.0% N.A. Kyrgyzstan - Shu/Chu* 7.0% 72.7% 7.5% 13.0% Liberia - Loffa 88.5% 66.6% 100.0% N.A. Guatemala - Suchiate* 73.5% 65.8% 0.0% 60.0% Ethiopia - Lotagipi Swamp** 8.4% 7.3% 40.3% N.A. Mexico - Suchiate* 26.5% 34.2% 100.0% 40.0% Kenya - Lotagipi Swamp** 52.4% 63.5% 29.4% N.A. Kyrgyzstan - Talas* 20.7% 25.1% 68.6% 21.2% Sudan - Lotagipi Swamp** 34.1% 18.9% 30.2% N.A. Finland - Tana* 41.1% 37.1% 83.8% N.A. Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-14 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Uganda - Lotagipi Swamp** 5.1% 10.2% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Tana* 58.9% 62.9% 16.2% N.A. Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ma* Iran - Tigris- 43.8% 11.5% 44.2% 16.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 19.7% 17.1% 26.2% 12.9% Vietnam - Ma* Jordan - Tigris- 56.2% 88.5% 55.8% 84.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Brazil - Maroni* Syria - Tigris- 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 14.7% 16.2% 1.4% 17.1% Colombia - Mataje* Norway - 28.6% 43.5% N.A. 0.0% Torne/Tornealven 3.8% 1.1% 26.3% N.A. Ecuador - Mataje* Finland - 71.4% 56.5% N.A. 100.0% Torne/Tornealven* 28.6% 36.4% 43.2% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Mbe 7.1% 31.7% 0.0% N.A. Ecuador - Tumbes** 71.1% 74.3% 100.0% 82.3% Gabon - Mbe 92.9% 68.3% 100.0% N.A. Peru - Tumbes** 28.9% 25.7% 0.0% 17.7% Colombia - Mira* 51.8% 38.7% 85.5% 1.3% China - Tumen* 69.7% 70.3% 50.1% 67.6% Ecuador - Mira* 48.2% 61.3% 14.5% 98.7% Albania - Vijose* 64.5% 93.8% 55.3% 85.5% Liberia - Moa Czech Republic - 13.1% 7.5% 0.0% N.A. Vistula/Wista 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Benin - Mono* 5.0% 14.4% 0.0% 2.3% Byelarus - Vistula/Wista* 5.1% 2.4% 2.9% 8.8% Togo - Mono* 95.0% 85.6% 100.0% 97.7% Poland - Vistula/Wista* 87.2% 88.9% 89.2% 90.9% Afghanistan - Murgab* 59.8% 66.3% 90.0% 18.0% Russia - Volga 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% Syria - Nahr El Kebir* 86.4% 93.5% N.A. 100.0% Byelarus - Volga* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Croatia - Neretva* 3.5% 3.1% 0.0% 2.5% Kazakhstan - Volga* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Algeria - Niger** 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Benin - Volta* 3.6% 2.7% 5.3% 2.9% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-15 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Nyanga* 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% N.A. Burkina Faso - Volta* 42.1% 48.4% 24.6% 30.1% Gabon - Nyanga* 93.4% 97.3% 100.0% N.A. Mali - Volta* 4.6% 2.7% 1.0% 0.9% Cameroon - Ogooue 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.0% Togo - Volta* 6.3% 7.9% 20.1% 3.9% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Ogooue 11.9% 13.8% 10.2% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Volta** 3.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% Equatorial Guinea - Ogooue 0.9% 4.6% 1.8% 0.0% Finland - Vuoksa 86.4% 98.6% 93.9% 100.0% Gabon - Ogooue 84.9% 78.4% 87.0% 100.0% Russia - Vuoksa 13.6% 1.4% 6.1% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Okavango* United States of America - 3.2% 13.9% 0.3% 0.0% Yaqui** 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.3% Kazakhstan - Oral/Ural 56.5% 30.3% 47.4% 94.8% Russia - Oral/Ural 43.5% 69.7% 52.6% 5.2% Colombia - Orinoco 34.7% 16.6% 36.2% 42.5% Togo - Oueme** 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Oulu 93.2% 99.6% 93.1% 100.0% Russia - Oulu 6.8% 0.4% 6.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Pakchan 51.1% 30.5% 47.7% 31.9% Thailand - Pakchan 48.9% 69.5% 52.3% 68.1% Argentina - Palena 45.0% 24.0% 9.3% N.A. Chile - Palena 55.0% 76.0% 90.7% N.A. Malaysia - Pandaruan 42.0% 7.8% N.A. N.A. Estonia - Parnu 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Latvia - Parnu 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Pascua* 46.1% 36.0% 41.5% N.A. Chile - Pascua* 53.9% 64.0% 58.5% N.A. Colombia - Patia* 97.6% 90.9% 100.0% 78.9% Ecuador - Patia* 2.4% 9.1% 0.0% 21.1% Russia - Prohladnaja 77.1% 86.4% N.A. 100.0% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-16 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Poland - Prohladnaja* 22.9% 13.6% N.A. 0.0% Chile - Puelo 34.2% 12.0% 26.7% 0.0% Argentina - Puelo* 65.8% 88.0% 73.3% 100.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Red/Song Hong 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Red/Song Hong* 53.7% 38.4% 42.7% 55.3% Vietnam - Red/Song Hong* 45.6% 61.6% 57.3% 44.7% Argentina - Rio Grande (South America)* 49.6% 85.1% 30.4% N.A. Chile - Rio Grande (South America)* 50.4% 14.9% 69.6% N.A. Malawi - Ruvuma* 0.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Saigon 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Estonia - Salaca 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% N.A. Latvia - Salaca 94.5% 98.6% 100.0% N.A. Myanmar (Burma) - Salween 43.8% 51.1% 46.5% 27.2% Thailand - Salween* 3.7% 2.3% 7.8% 4.8% Azerbaijan - Samur* 6.5% 2.5% 0.0% 14.2% Russia - Samur* 93.5% 97.5% 100.0% 85.8% Nicaragua - San Juan* 69.9% 88.5% 54.0% 69.8% Argentina - San Martin* 12.2% 57.9% N.A. N.A. Chile - San Martin* 87.8% 42.1% N.A. N.A. Cameroon - Sanaga 99.0% 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% Nigeria - Sanaga 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 0.0% Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-17 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Central African Republic - Sanaga* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Sassandra* 12.3% 6.5% 22.6% 0.0% Indonesia - Sembakung 52.9% 18.5% 83.5% 100.0% Malaysia - Sembakung 47.1% 81.5% 16.5% 0.0% Argentina - Seno Union/Serrano* 10.3% 1.1% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Seno Union/Serrano* 89.7% 98.9% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - St. John (Africa) 16.9% 21.1% 27.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. John (Africa) 83.0% 78.9% 73.0% 100.0% Liberia - St. Paul 55.5% 44.9% 63.7% 100.0% Guinea - St. Paul* 44.5% 55.1% 36.3% 0.0% China - Sujfun* 64.7% 60.0% 64.3% 60.2% Russia - Sujfun* 35.3% 40.0% 35.7% 39.8% Azerbaijan - Sulak* 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Sulak* 92.4% 99.7% 74.4% 100.0% Algeria - Tafna* 74.6% 60.9% 100.0% 58.8% Morocco - Tafna** 25.4% 39.1% 0.0% 41.2% Indonesia - Tami 97.6% 97.8% 95.6% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tami 2.4% 2.2% 4.4% 0.0% China - Tarim* 97.2% 99.8% 58.4% 99.5% Guatemala - Temash 15.0% 49.7% N.A. N.A. Russia - Terek 95.3% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% South Africa - Thukela* 99.7% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Tuloma 92.1% 100.0% 84.3% N.A. Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-18 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Finland - Tuloma* 7.9% 0.0% 15.7% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Utamboni 40.9% 69.9% 43.9% N.A. Gabon - Utamboni 59.1% 30.1% 56.1% N.A. Argentina - Valdivia* 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Latvia - Venta 64.9% 34.3% 53.5% N.A. Lithuania - Venta 35.1% 65.7% 46.5% N.A. Denmark - Wiedau 85.0% 88.4% N.A. 100.0% China - Yalu* 52.9% 58.6% 50.7% 47.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Yalu* 47.1% 41.4% 49.3% 52.9% Chile - Yelcho 37.8% 17.5% 58.0% 0.0% Argentina - Yelcho* 62.2% 82.5% 42.0% 100.0% Belgium - Yser* 47.5% 53.1% N.A. 0.0% France - Yser* 52.5% 46.9% N.A. 100.0% Argentina - Zapaleri** 19.8% 2.4% 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Zapaleri** 21.7% 19.5% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Zapaleri** 58.5% 78.1% 0.0% N.A. Appendix 9 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Driest climate scenario A9-19 Figure A9-1. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience high increases in runoff variability for 2050. A9-20 Figure A9-2. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience moderate increases in runoff variability for 2050. A9-21 Figure A9-3. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience little or no increase in runoff variability for 2050. A9-22 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario The data in this appendix are organized by risk levels as diagrammed in Figure 8 of the main text. Country-basin units are listed alphabetically in each category of combined vulnerability and hazard. In addition, the relative importance of the basin in several dimensions appear to the right of each CBU. The percentages listed are the proportions of the basin that the CBU contributes to the basin total for each variable (area from TFDD; population from Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008; runoff from Fekete, Vorosmarty and Grabs 2000; irrigated area from Doll and Siebert 2001). CBUs marked with a "**" had a high present hazard level. CBUs marked with a "*" had a medium present hazard level. CBUs with no asterisks had a low present hazard level. Figures A10-1, A10-2 and A10-3 show the hazard-vulnerability combinations used in the main text. High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Azerbaijan - Astara Turkmenistan - Aral High Hazard Chay* 17.4% 27.1% N.A. 0.0% Sea* 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 4.8% Gambia, The - Gambia* 8.5% 28.5% 12.5% 68.8% Ethiopia - Awash* 92.7% 99.5% 100.0% 99.7% Turkmenistan - Atrak* 31.1% 5.0% 2.9% 4.2% Senegal - Gambia* 72.6% 42.3% 57.8% 4.3% Djibouti - Awash** Guatemala - Coatan India - Ganges- 7.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Achute* 12.6% 17.4% N.A. 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 62.3% 75.2% 58.1% 83.4% Iran - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehy Mexico - Coatan e** 99.8% 99.8% N.A. 100.0% Achute* 87.4% 82.6% N.A. 100.0% Spain - Garonne* 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Sudan - Baraka* Mozambique - 37.3% 9.3% N.A. 80.9% Guinea - Corubal* 72.9% 88.7% 66.2% 0.0% Limpopo* 21.0% 7.5% 0.0% 47.9% Gabon - Benito/Ntem South Africa - 23.9% 11.9% 15.0% N.A. Byelarus - Daugava 48.3% 64.7% 57.1% 100.0% Limpopo* 44.3% 78.8% 91.3% 38.7% Ghana - Bia* 58.9% 60.4% 37.4% 0.0% Latvia - Daugava 34.3% 29.8% 29.1% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Zambezi* 15.5% 23.7% 8.2% 23.7% Guinea - Cavally* 4.2% 8.8% 5.6% 0.0% Lithuania - Daugava* 1.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Cestos* 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Dnieper 24.1% 19.7% 37.2% 2.3% Algeria - Daoura** 47.3% 1.2% N.A. 0.0% Guinea - Gambia* 18.9% 29.3% 29.7% 26.9% Iran - Dasht** 21.5% 4.4% N.A. 3.0% Guinea - Geba* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Morocco - Dra* 78.6% 99.7% 100.0% 96.0% Senegal - Geba* 32.2% 35.1% 20.9% 0.0% Andorra - Ebro* 0.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% Iran - Helmand* 15.5% 12.5% 0.3% 25.3% Andorra - Garonne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Hondo* 57.2% 91.3% 40.7% 97.7% A10-1 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Latvia - Gauja Ethiopia - Lake 90.4% 97.8% 100.0% N.A. Turkana* 54.8% 81.9% 79.4% 85.1% Turkmenistan - Hari/Harirud* 17.4% 6.2% 0.0% 21.7% Latvia - Lielupe 66.5% 67.2% 65.9% N.A. Pakistan - Helmand* 3.0% 1.7% 1.4% 0.4% Lithuania - Lielupe 33.5% 32.8% 34.1% N.A. Ghana - Komoe* 2.9% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Limpopo** 15.1% 5.5% 8.7% 7.4% Georgia - Kura-Araks* 17.7% 19.0% 33.5% 22.3% Byelarus - Narva 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% N.A. Russia - Lake Ubsa-Nur 24.1% 21.3% 13.4% 36.9% Latvia - Narva 11.1% 13.9% 15.6% N.A. Zimbabwe - Pungwe* 5.7% 7.2% 23.0% 0.0% Russia - Narva 53.4% 52.1% 41.4% N.A. Zimbabwe - Sabi* 73.9% 92.4% 90.7% 100.0% Byelarus - Neman 46.4% 44.3% 46.1% 98.4% Moldova - Sarata* 37.0% 57.2% 100.0% 100.0% Lithuania - Neman 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 0.0% Ukraine - Sarata* 63.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Neman 5.3% 2.9% 6.3% 0.0% Algeria - Tafna* 74.6% 60.9% 100.0% 58.8% Latvia - Neman* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Poland - Neman* 4.2% 3.6% 5.2% 1.6% Central African Republic - Nile* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bulgaria - Rezvaya* 18.4% 2.3% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Rezvaya* 81.6% 97.7% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Suchiate* 73.5% 65.8% 0.0% 60.0% Mexico - Suchiate* 26.5% 34.2% 100.0% 40.0% Byelarus - Vistula/Wista* 5.1% 2.4% 2.9% 8.8% Poland - Vistula/Wista* 87.2% 88.9% 89.2% 90.9% Mexico - Yaqui** 94.1% 94.8% 100.0% 97.7% A10-2 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area United States of America - Yaqui** 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.3% Guinea-Bissau - Corubal* 27.1% 11.3% 33.8% 100.0% Guinea-Bissau - Gambia* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea-Bissau - Geba* 67.4% 64.6% 79.1% 100.0% Cameroon - Akpa Afghanistan - Moderate Hazard 62.1% 40.1% 73.8% 100.0% Helmand* 81.5% 85.8% 98.3% 74.3% Kazakhstan - Aral Sea* 34.5% 5.2% 8.8% 31.1% Nigeria - Akpa Bhutan - Ganges- 37.9% 59.9% 26.2% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% 0.2% Uzbekistan - Aral Sea* 31.1% 58.8% 9.3% 46.4% Turkey - Asi/Orontes* United States of 49.9% 31.3% 54.7% 46.2% Botswana - Limpopo* 19.6% 8.1% 0.0% 6.0% America - Colorado* 98.4% 94.6% 100.0% 85.6% Latvia - Barta Bosnia and 61.8% 39.7% 100.0% N.A. Bulgaria - Maritsa* 66.5% 67.3% 58.1% 67.2% Herzegovina - Danube 4.9% 4.7% 10.0% 0.2% Lithuania - Barta Cameroon - 38.2% 60.3% 0.0% N.A. Congo/Zaire 2.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% Slovakia - Danube 5.8% 6.3% 4.4% 7.5% Cameroon - Benito/Ntem Central African 42.0% 52.3% 31.2% N.A. Republic - Congo/Zaire 10.9% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% Slovenia - Danube 2.2% 2.2% 6.2% 0.3% Mozambique - Buzi* Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 88.7% 76.3% 86.3% 52.2% Zambezi* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bulgaria - Danube* 5.2% 4.0% 7.0% 4.7% Zimbabwe - Buzi* 11.3% 23.7% 13.7% 47.8% France - Bidasoa 12.5% 22.5% N.A. N.A. Croatia - Danube* 4.5% 3.9% 7.9% 0.0% Sudan - Congo/Zaire* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% France - Ebro 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% Canada - Firth* 59.6% N.A. 0.0% N.A. A10-3 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guyana - Corantijn/Courantyne* 52.0% 40.1% 38.9% N.A. Greece - Vardar* 12.0% 4.9% 0.0% 19.9% France - Garonne 98.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Suriname - Corantijn/Courantyne* Mongolia - Har Us 47.9% 59.9% 61.1% N.A. Guatemala - Paz* 54.2% 29.0% N.A. 24.0% Nur* 96.8% 97.6% 97.9% 100.0% Georgia - Coruh South Africa - 8.9% 20.5% 11.7% 0.0% Guinea - Senegal* 7.1% 14.7% 40.7% 1.2% Incomati* 62.3% 73.5% 100.0% 57.8% Turkey - Coruh* 91.1% 79.5% 88.3% 100.0% Italy - Rhine 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Indus* 52.5% 60.4% 10.1% 60.1% Cameroon - Cross 23.7% 5.6% 36.5% 0.0% Italy - Roia* 32.8% 65.8% N.A. 85.7% Namibia - Kunene** 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% Morocco - Daoura** 52.7% 98.8% N.A. 100.0% Ivory Coast - Volta** 3.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% Spain - Lima* 51.8% 33.5% 0.0% 25.3% Algeria - Dra** 21.4% 0.3% 0.0% 4.0% Kazakhstan - Talas* 79.3% 74.9% 31.4% 78.8% Spain - Mino* 95.8% 94.4% 100.0% 86.7% Serbia - Drin* 28.8% 46.3% 37.1% 26.1% Kenya - Lake Turkana* 43.3% 17.7% 20.4% 14.9% Cameroon - Niger 4.2% 4.2% 11.4% 5.6% Malaysia - Golok Kyrgyzstan - Ili/Kunes 43.6% 30.2% N.A. 10.9% He* 5.5% 1.0% 24.5% 5.1% Guinea - Niger 4.5% 2.3% 14.8% 0.8% Thailand - Golok Lebanon - An Nahr Al 56.4% 69.8% N.A. 89.1% Kabir* 32.6% 38.4% 100.0% 60.6% Chad - Niger* 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% Algeria - Guir** 77.5% 83.5% N.A. 85.5% Macedonia - Vardar* 63.5% 52.9% 75.1% 70.1% Ivory Coast - Niger* 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.1% Morocco - Guir** 22.5% 16.5% N.A. 14.5% Mexico - Candelaria* 85.5% 96.7% 100.0% N.A. Mali - Niger* 25.6% 9.6% 5.9% 59.4% Russia - Har Us Nur* 3.0% 2.4% 2.1% 0.0% Mexico - Grijalva* 61.6% 62.3% 56.3% 96.5% Sudan - Nile* 63.6% 18.9% 38.2% 77.4% Belize - Hondo* 13.0% 6.9% 7.8% 2.3% Poland - Lava/Pregel* 24.7% 15.5% 21.2% 100.0% Namibia - Orange** 25.4% 1.6% 0.0% 35.9% Ukraine - Kogilnik* United States of Syria - An Nahr Al America - Rio Grande 42.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% Kabir* 67.4% 61.6% 0.0% 39.4% (North America)* 51.8% 24.6% 49.9% 31.5% Burkina Faso - Komoe* 21.7% 21.3% 20.2% 39.5% Syria - Asi/Orontes* 44.3% 65.6% 42.3% 49.0% Mali - Senegal* 34.6% 36.5% 49.0% 13.1% Mali - Komoe* 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Spain - Bidasoa 87.5% 77.5% N.A. N.A. Senegal - Senegal* 8.1% 16.4% 8.3% 22.9% A10-4 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Afghanistan - Kowl E United States of Namaksar* America - St. John 28.8% 6.6% 0.0% 3.0% Rwanda - Congo/Zaire* 0.1% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% (North America)* 36.5% 17.9% 40.1% 100.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Krka 12.8% 3.2% N.A. N.A. Zambia - Congo/Zaire* 4.8% 2.8% 6.0% 0.5% Greece - Struma* 26.2% 22.3% 18.7% 31.3% Croatia - Krka 87.2% 96.8% N.A. N.A. Russia - Daugava 16.1% 4.5% 13.8% 0.0% Macedonia - Struma* 11.7% 13.5% 0.0% 16.1% Turkey - Kura-Araks* 14.3% 7.0% 29.8% 12.4% Ukraine - Dniester* 75.3% 63.4% 97.8% 43.6% Serbia - Struma* 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Little Scarcies 31.0% 16.7% 30.5% 0.0% Sweden - Glama 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Tijuana* 73.3% 95.8% N.A. 84.0% Guinea - Loffa Ukraine - 11.5% 33.4% 0.0% N.A. Sweden - Klaralven 84.8% 97.6% 82.0% 70.0% Vistula/Wista* 6.7% 7.9% 4.8% 0.0% Sudan - Lotagipi Uganda - Lake Swamp** 34.1% 18.9% 30.2% N.A. Turkana* 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Canada - Yukon 39.8% 22.9% 37.0% 0.0% Greece - Maritsa* 7.6% 3.1% 4.0% 11.8% Russia - Lava/Pregel 75.3% 84.5% 78.8% 0.0% Malawi - Zambezi* 8.0% 35.2% 6.0% 3.7% Brazil - Maroni* Mozambique - 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Turkey - Maritsa* 25.9% 29.5% 37.9% 21.0% Zambezi* 11.8% 7.6% 6.8% 17.2% Gabon - Mbe 92.9% 68.3% 100.0% N.A. Serbia - Vardar* 24.5% 42.2% 24.9% 10.0% Algeria - Medjerda* Slovakia - 33.3% 33.0% 22.3% 9.8% Vistula/Wista* 1.0% 0.9% 3.1% 0.3% Syria - Nahr El Kebir* 86.4% 93.5% N.A. 100.0% Turkey - Nahr El Kebir* 13.6% 6.5% N.A. 0.0% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Neretva 96.5% 96.9% 100.0% 97.5% Bulgaria - Nestos* 53.4% 61.6% 54.9% 31.8% Greece - Nestos* 46.6% 38.4% 45.1% 68.2% Cameroon - Ogooue 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.0% Finland - Oulu 93.2% 99.6% 93.1% 100.0% A10-5 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Kenya - Pangani* 2.6% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Latvia - Parnu 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Mozambique - Pungwe* 94.3% 92.8% 77.0% 100.0% China - Red/Song Hong* 53.7% 38.4% 42.7% 55.3% Malawi - Ruvuma* 0.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% Mozambique - Sabi* 26.1% 7.6% 9.3% 0.0% Estonia - Salaca 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% N.A. Latvia - Salaca 94.5% 98.6% 100.0% N.A. Cameroon - Sanaga 99.0% 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% Nigeria - Sanaga 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 0.0% Central African Republic - Sanaga* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Sassandra 87.7% 93.5% 77.4% 100.0% Guinea - Sassandra* 12.3% 6.5% 22.6% 0.0% Guinea - St. Paul* 44.5% 55.1% 36.3% 0.0% Bulgaria - Struma* 58.2% 63.4% 81.3% 52.6% Georgia - Sulak* 7.3% 0.2% 25.6% 0.0% Ghana - Tano* 89.1% 94.1% 68.5% 0.0% Georgia - Terek* 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Gabon - Utamboni 59.1% 30.1% 56.1% N.A. Chile - Valdivia* 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Bulgaria - Velaka* 94.4% 95.0% N.A. N.A. Turkey - Velaka* 5.6% 5.0% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Venta 64.9% 34.3% 53.5% N.A. Israel - Wadi Al Izziyah* 32.2% 26.2% 100.0% 37.2% Lebanon - Wadi Al Izziyah* 67.8% 73.8% 0.0% 62.8% A10-6 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area France - Yser* 52.5% 46.9% N.A. 100.0% Venezuela - Amacuro Low Hazard 86.9% 15.0% 100.0% N.A. Brazil - Amazon 62.4% 31.4% 76.0% 3.6% Canada - Alsek 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Guyana - Amacuro* 13.1% 85.0% 0.0% N.A. Colombia - Amazon 6.3% 3.5% 11.7% 5.7% China - Amur 42.6% 94.4% 26.6% 83.4% French Guiana - Amazon 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Ecuador - Amazon 2.1% 6.1% 0.6% 24.7% Mongolia - Amur 9.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Amur 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guyana - Amazon 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Kyrgyzstan - Aral Sea 9.1% 5.8% 23.4% 4.2% China - Aral Sea 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Peru - Amazon 16.3% 35.1% 6.8% 54.1% Tajikistan - Aral Sea 11.0% 15.3% 22.4% 10.7% Iran - Astara Chay 82.6% 72.9% N.A. 100.0% Suriname - Amazon 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Canada - Chilkat 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Mauritania - Atui** United States of 64.6% 86.8% N.A. N.A. Venezuela - Amazon 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% America - Chilkat 50.5% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Western Sahara - Atui** 35.4% 13.2% N.A. N.A. Bolivia - Amazon* 12.0% 23.8% 4.4% 11.9% Mexico - Colorado 1.6% 5.4% 0.0% 14.4% Argentina - Aviles 88.8% 94.1% N.A. N.A. Russia - Amur 48.2% 5.3% 72.8% 16.0% Canada - Columbia 15.3% 6.1% 31.0% 3.9% Chile - Aviles United States of 11.2% 5.9% N.A. N.A. Afghanistan - Aral Sea 8.5% 12.1% 34.3% 2.8% America - Columbia 84.7% 93.9% 69.0% 96.1% Somalia - Awash** Congo, Democratic Dominican Republic - Republic of (Kinshasa) - 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% Artibonite 27.2% 10.0% 45.3% 19.2% Congo/Zaire 62.4% 75.4% 66.5% 96.8% Argentina - Aysen 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% N.A. Haiti - Artibonite 72.8% 90.0% 54.7% 80.8% Austria - Danube 10.3% 9.4% 26.5% 5.7% Chile - Aysen Czech Republic - 95.9% 99.9% 100.0% N.A. Lebanon - Asi/Orontes 5.8% 3.1% 3.0% 4.8% Danube 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 1.0% Pakistan - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehy e 0.2% 0.2% N.A. 0.0% Iran - Atrak 68.9% 95.0% 97.1% 95.8% Germany - Danube 7.5% 11.9% 10.7% 0.8% Argentina - Baker 31.6% 26.9% 26.3% 9.6% Guatemala - Candelaria 14.5% 3.3% 0.0% N.A. Hungary - Danube 11.7% 12.2% 1.9% 7.8% Chile - Baker 68.4% 73.1% 73.7% 90.4% Ecuador - Chira** 38.1% 27.4% 59.7% 30.4% Moldova - Danube 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 2.5% A10-7 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Brunei - Bangau 54.4% 23.0% N.A. N.A. Peru - Chira** 61.9% 72.6% 40.3% 69.6% Montenegro - Danube 0.9% 0.3% 3.0% 0.0% Malaysia - Bangau 45.6% 77.0% N.A. N.A. Angola - Congo/Zaire 7.9% 1.9% 7.6% 0.0% Poland - Danube 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Ireland - Bann 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Burundi - Congo/Zaire 0.4% 4.6% 0.2% 0.5% Romania - Danube 29.0% 26.8% 12.2% 63.6% United Kingdom - Bann Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - 97.1% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% Congo/Zaire 6.7% 2.5% 8.0% 0.0% Serbia - Danube 9.4% 10.0% 4.7% 1.0% Eritrea - Baraka Tanzania, United Republic of - 62.7% 90.7% N.A. 19.1% Congo/Zaire 4.5% 5.9% 1.9% 2.0% Ukraine - Danube 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 4.9% Guyana - Barima 52.2% 99.3% 100.0% N.A. Argentina - Cullen 17.1% 9.9% 0.0% N.A. Portugal - Douro/Duero 18.2% 50.4% 38.3% 22.1% Venezuela - Barima 47.8% 0.7% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Cullen 82.9% 90.1% 100.0% N.A. Spain - Douro/Duero 81.8% 49.6% 61.7% 77.9% China - Bei Jiang/Hsi 97.6% 98.9% 97.3% 99.6% Albania - Danube 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Czech Republic - Elbe 36.1% 25.9% 38.4% 37.5% Vietnam - Bei Jiang/Hsi 2.4% 1.1% 2.7% 0.4% Italy - Danube 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Germany - Elbe 62.7% 73.2% 61.6% 62.5% China - Beilun 84.0% 69.2% 100.0% 95.8% Switzerland - Danube 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Poland - Elbe 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Beilun United States of 16.0% 30.8% 0.0% 4.2% Russia - Dnieper 17.8% 11.2% 22.8% 1.2% America - Firth 40.4% N.A. 100.0% N.A. Belize - Belize 61.9% 51.5% 83.5% 100.0% Ukraine - Dnieper 58.0% 69.1% 40.1% 96.5% Canada - Fraser 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 99.4% Guatemala - Belize United States of 38.1% 48.5% 16.5% 0.0% Moldova - Dniester 24.6% 36.6% 2.2% 56.4% America - Fraser 0.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% Equatorial Guinea - Benito/Ntem Bangladesh - Ganges- 34.1% 35.8% 53.9% N.A. Poland - Dniester 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Brahmaputra-Meghna 6.6% 19.6% 8.0% 9.7% Ivory Coast - Bia Nepal - Ganges- 41.1% 39.6% 62.6% 100.0% Albania - Drin 45.6% 37.5% 56.5% 60.2% Brahmaputra-Meghna 9.0% 4.6% 11.9% 3.6% A10-8 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ca/Song-Koi 35.2% 4.3% 51.0% 9.1% Macedonia - Drin 13.2% 8.8% 6.4% 10.5% Portugal - Guadiana 18.9% 17.4% 38.8% 11.8% Vietnam - Ca/Song-Koi 64.8% 95.7% 49.0% 90.9% Spain - Ebro 99.2% 97.8% 100.0% 99.7% Spain - Guadiana 81.1% 82.6% 61.2% 88.2% Bolivia - Cancoso/Lauca** 85.8% 96.2% 70.0% 100.0% Indonesia - Fly 6.7% 0.9% 0.0% N.A. China - Har Us Nur 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Papua New Guinea - Cancoso/Lauca** 14.2% 3.8% 30.0% 0.0% Fly 93.3% 99.1% 100.0% N.A. Swaziland - Incomati 6.3% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0% Argentina - Carmen Mozambique - Silva/Chico 59.2% 97.2% 100.0% N.A. Eritrea - Gash** 53.6% 44.8% 58.0% 10.0% Incomati** 31.3% 18.1% 0.0% 36.2% Chile - Carmen Silva/Chico 40.8% 2.8% 0.0% N.A. Sudan - Gash** 23.9% 25.2% 0.0% 85.0% India - Indus 33.7% 35.0% 61.3% 38.6% Ireland - Castletown 16.9% 40.7% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Glama 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Israel - Jordan 27.0% 4.2% 42.5% 31.3% United Kingdom - Castletown 83.1% 59.3% 100.0% N.A. Guinea - Great Scarcies 74.7% 59.8% 48.6% 79.1% Jordan - Jordan 57.1% 83.4% 20.6% 43.2% Colombia - Catatumbo Sierra Leone - Great 63.3% 73.0% 62.2% 82.4% Scarcies 25.3% 40.2% 51.4% 20.9% Lebanon - Jordan 2.1% 1.0% 26.9% 2.3% Venezuela - Catatumbo 36.7% 27.0% 37.8% 17.6% Guatemala - Grijalva 38.3% 37.7% 43.7% 3.5% Syria - Jordan 13.3% 11.5% 10.0% 23.2% Ivory Coast - Cavally 54.6% 71.1% 45.3% 92.2% Guatemala - Hondo 29.8% 1.8% 51.5% 0.0% Angola - Kunene 86.7% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% Liberia - Cavally 41.2% 20.1% 49.1% 7.8% China - Ili/Kunes He 34.3% 51.0% 10.7% 27.2% Argentina - La Plata 27.7% 16.5% 11.2% 40.8% Ivory Coast - Cestos Kazakhstan - Ili/Kunes 15.3% 59.1% 24.3% 0.0% He 60.2% 48.0% 64.8% 67.7% Brazil - La Plata 46.7% 70.2% 71.7% 29.5% Liberia - Cestos 84.5% 40.8% 75.7% 100.0% Afghanistan - Indus 6.3% 4.6% 9.6% 1.3% Paraguay - La Plata 13.5% 9.8% 8.7% 24.6% Guatemala - Chamelecon 2.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Italy - Isonzo 39.1% 68.5% 46.4% 41.2% Uruguay - La Plata 3.8% 1.1% 5.5% 2.8% Honduras - Chamelecon 97.2% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Slovenia - Isonzo 60.9% 31.5% 53.6% 58.8% Brazil - Lagoon Mirim 43.2% 53.8% 43.9% 65.8% Costa Rica - Uruguay - Lagoon Changuinola 7.2% 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% Egypt - Jordan** 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mirim 56.8% 46.2% 56.1% 34.2% A10-9 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Panama - Changuinola Bolivia - Lake Titicaca- 92.8% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% Ethiopia - Juba-Shibeli 45.7% 66.5% 66.8% 48.1% Poopo System 56.4% 49.9% 44.1% 81.6% Angola - Chiloango Chile - Lake Titicaca- 32.5% 5.7% 30.3% N.A. Kenya - Juba-Shibeli 26.8% 14.0% 31.5% 3.9% Poopo System** 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Chiloango Somalia - Juba- Peru - Lake Titicaca- 64.7% 92.7% 69.7% N.A. Shibeli** 27.5% 19.6% 1.6% 48.1% Poopo System 42.9% 50.1% 55.9% 18.4% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Chiloango 2.8% 1.5% 0.0% N.A. Finland - Kemi 94.4% 96.9% 96.3% N.A. Portugal - Lima 48.2% 66.5% 100.0% 74.7% Panama - Chiriqui 96.1% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Kemi 5.6% 3.1% 3.7% N.A. Mozambique - Maputo 5.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% Honduras - Choluteca 96.6% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Norway - Klaralven 15.2% 2.4% 18.0% 30.0% South Africa - Maputo 60.1% 39.4% 70.1% 36.8% Nicaragua - Choluteca 3.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Armenia - Kura-Araks 15.3% 22.9% 7.7% 9.0% Swaziland - Maputo 34.9% 59.7% 29.9% 62.4% Honduras - Coco/Segovia Azerbaijan - Kura- Cambodia 24.3% 7.4% 43.4% 7.3% Araks 32.0% 34.6% 12.2% 40.2% (Kampuchea) - Mekong 20.1% 19.4% 20.0% 16.8% Nicaragua - Laos, People's Coco/Segovia Democratic Republic of 75.7% 92.6% 56.6% 92.7% Iran - Kura-Araks 20.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% - Mekong 25.1% 10.0% 36.4% 12.1% Argentina - Comau 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Bolivia - La Plata 8.3% 2.3% 2.9% 2.4% Thailand - Mekong 24.6% 41.3% 16.1% 26.8% Chile - Comau 88.9% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Cameroon - Lake Chad 2.0% 6.1% 12.9% 12.7% Vietnam - Mekong 4.8% 18.0% 6.7% 14.8% Gabon - Congo/Zaire Central African 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Republic - Lake Chad 9.1% 2.8% 24.4% 0.0% Portugal - Mino 4.2% 5.6% 0.0% 13.3% Malawi - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chad - Lake Chad 45.7% 22.2% 38.0% 32.7% Canada - Mississippi 1.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% A10-10 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Uganda - United States of Congo/Zaire** 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Nigeria - Lake Chad 7.5% 56.5% 19.5% 26.3% America - Mississippi 98.4% 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Brazil - Canada - Nelson- Corantijn/Courantyne 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Niger - Lake Chad** 28.2% 5.7% 0.4% 23.8% Saskatchewan 85.9% 87.6% 87.4% 94.3% Costa Rica - United States of Corredores/Colorado America - Nelson- 95.4% 90.1% 100.0% 100.0% Albania - Lake Prespa 88.1% 97.9% 100.0% 94.3% Saskatchewan 14.1% 12.4% 12.6% 5.7% Nigeria - Cross 76.3% 94.4% 63.5% 100.0% Greece - Lake Prespa 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0% Benin - Niger 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% 0.6% Angola - Macedonia - Lake Cuvelai/Etosha 31.8% 16.1% 76.4% 0.0% Prespa 8.6% 1.8% 0.0% 4.7% Burkina Faso - Niger 3.9% 3.0% 1.0% 0.7% Namibia - Cuvelai/Etosha 68.2% 83.9% 23.6% 100.0% El Salvador - Lempa 56.5% 85.0% 38.7% 92.4% Nigeria - Niger 26.6% 66.4% 59.8% 15.6% Pakistan - Dasht** 78.5% 95.6% N.A. 97.0% Guatemala - Lempa 14.0% 7.3% 36.0% 6.9% Niger - Niger** 23.6% 11.6% 0.8% 17.2% Russia - Don 87.2% 66.4% 82.6% 50.1% Honduras - Lempa 29.5% 7.7% 25.3% 0.7% Burundi - Nile 0.4% 2.8% 0.8% 0.0% Ukraine - Don 12.8% 33.6% 17.4% 49.9% Liberia - Mana-Morro 83.4% 77.8% 100.0% N.A. Kenya - Nile 1.7% 8.3% 6.0% 0.0% Montenegro - Drin Sierra Leone - Mana- 12.3% 7.4% 0.0% 3.2% Morro 16.6% 22.2% 0.0% N.A. Rwanda - Nile 0.7% 4.6% 1.8% 0.1% Russia - Elancik Tanzania, United 73.0% 56.6% N.A. 0.0% French Guiana - Maroni 41.8% 54.7% 34.9% 100.0% Republic of - Nile 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% 0.0% Ukraine - Elancik 27.0% 43.4% N.A. 100.0% Suriname - Maroni 58.0% 45.3% 65.1% 0.0% Uganda - Nile 7.9% 17.1% 6.9% 0.4% Austria - Elbe Dominican Republic - 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Massacre 45.7% 23.0% 0.0% 61.1% Egypt - Nile** 9.2% 25.6% 0.0% 19.3% Ireland - Erne 57.5% 56.6% 100.0% N.A. Haiti - Massacre 54.3% 77.0% 100.0% 38.9% China - Ob 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.5% United Kingdom - Erne 42.5% 43.4% 0.0% N.A. China - Mekong 21.8% 10.2% 18.6% 26.8% Mongolia - Ob** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Brazil - Essequibo Myanmar (Burma) - Czech Republic - 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mekong 3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 2.8% Oder/Odra 8.4% 10.9% 6.5% 0.0% Guyana - Essequibo 67.9% 83.1% 81.2% 66.8% Guinea - Moa 39.3% 37.5% 39.9% N.A. Germany - Oder/Odra 6.2% 4.1% 4.0% 24.3% A10-11 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Suriname - Essequibo 10.1% 4.3% 6.1% 33.2% Sierra Leone - Moa 47.6% 55.0% 60.1% N.A. Poland - Oder/Odra 84.2% 84.4% 89.5% 75.4% Venezuela - Essequibo 21.9% 12.6% 12.7% 0.0% Finland - Naatamo 41.3% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Slovakia - Oder/Odra 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% Ireland - Fane 86.0% 84.1% N.A. N.A. Norway - Naatamo 58.7% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Angola - Okavango 21.2% 34.1% 92.0% 63.1% United Kingdom - Fane 14.0% 15.9% N.A. N.A. Estonia - Narva 33.8% 33.6% 43.0% N.A. Namibia - Okavango 24.9% 21.8% 0.7% 27.0% Bangladesh - Fenney Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Botswana - 34.3% 75.6% 0.0% 47.9% Nile 0.7% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% Okavango** 50.7% 30.2% 7.1% 9.9% India - Fenney 65.7% 24.4% 100.0% 52.1% Ethiopia - Nile 11.8% 16.4% 41.4% 2.8% Lesotho - Orange 2.1% 12.8% 37.5% 0.7% Ireland - Flurry 48.2% 68.9% N.A. N.A. Eritrea - Nile** 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% South Africa - Orange 59.7% 84.3% 62.5% 60.1% United Kingdom - Flurry 51.8% 31.1% N.A. N.A. Kazakhstan - Ob 25.2% 22.8% 9.2% 86.1% Botswana - Orange** 12.9% 1.3% 0.0% 3.3% Ireland - Foyle 31.6% 20.4% 50.0% N.A. Russia - Ob 74.3% 76.7% 90.8% 12.4% Finland - Pasvik 77.2% 41.6% 100.0% N.A. United Kingdom - Foyle 68.4% 79.6% 50.0% N.A. Finland - Olanga 10.5% 36.8% 12.6% N.A. Norway - Pasvik 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Gallegos/Chico 60.7% 81.9% 0.0% N.A. Russia - Olanga 89.5% 63.2% 87.4% N.A. Russia - Pasvik 16.5% 50.9% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Gallegos/Chico 39.3% 18.1% 100.0% N.A. Benin - Oueme 82.9% 81.8% 91.3% 89.4% Italy - Po 94.5% 98.1% 97.9% 99.5% China - Ganges- Brahmaputra-Meghna 19.7% 0.3% 18.6% 3.0% Nigeria - Oueme 16.4% 17.9% 8.7% 10.6% Switzerland - Po 5.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% Myanmar (Burma) - Ganges-Brahmaputra- Meghna 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% El Salvador - Paz 45.8% 71.0% N.A. 76.0% China - Pu Lun T'o 87.5% 97.9% 100.0% 98.0% Ethiopia - Gash** 22.5% 30.0% 42.0% 5.0% France - Po 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mongolia - Pu Lun T'o 12.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% Estonia - Gauja 9.6% 2.2% 0.0% N.A. France - Roia 67.2% 34.2% N.A. 14.3% Austria - Rhine 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% A10-12 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area El Salvador - Goascoran 47.7% 71.9% 51.1% 0.0% Mozambique - Ruvuma 65.2% 26.4% 71.8% 75.6% Belgium - Rhine 8.0% 5.3% 6.0% 5.1% Honduras - Goascoran Tanzania, United 52.3% 28.1% 48.9% 100.0% Republic of - Ruvuma 34.5% 70.8% 28.2% 24.4% France - Rhine 13.3% 7.3% 11.7% 8.3% Belize - Grijalva 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Belgium - Schelde 49.3% 56.5% 55.9% 36.8% Germany - Rhine 56.6% 66.1% 41.4% 36.5% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Han 28.7% 4.4% 39.6% 30.9% France - Schelde 50.2% 43.4% 44.1% 62.5% Luxembourg - Rhine 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% South Korea - Han 71.3% 95.6% 60.4% 69.1% Netherlands - Schelde 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% Netherlands - Rhine 5.7% 8.6% 2.1% 25.5% Afghanistan - Hari/Harirud 44.3% 37.5% 68.3% 14.4% Belgium - Seine 2.2% 0.8% 7.0% 0.8% Switzerland - Rhine 14.1% 11.2% 31.5% 24.6% Iran - Hari/Harirud 38.3% 56.4% 31.7% 63.9% France - Seine 97.7% 99.0% 93.0% 99.2% France - Rhone 89.6% 85.0% 76.7% 77.9% China - Indus 7.5% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% Luxembourg - Seine 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Switzerland - Rhone 10.2% 15.0% 23.3% 22.1% China - Irrawaddy Mexico - Rio Grande 4.6% 4.2% 9.1% 7.7% Indonesia - Sepik 3.3% 1.2% 0.0% N.A. (North America) 48.2% 75.4% 50.1% 68.5% India - Irrawaddy Papua New Guinea - 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 2.7% Sepik 96.7% 98.8% 100.0% N.A. Mauritania - Senegal** 50.3% 32.4% 2.0% 62.8% Myanmar (Burma) - Irrawaddy 91.6% 92.7% 88.7% 89.6% Kazakhstan - Shu/Chu 93.0% 27.3% 92.5% 87.0% Canada - Skagit 11.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Norway - Jacobs United States of 68.3% 91.1% 100.0% N.A. Kyrgyzstan - Shu/Chu 7.0% 72.7% 7.5% 13.0% America - Skagit 88.3% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Jacobs 31.7% 8.9% 0.0% N.A. Costa Rica - Sixaola 81.5% 74.4% 100.0% N.A. Canada - St. Croix 35.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% Mongolia - United States of Jenisej/Yenisey 12.8% 23.5% 2.9% 3.2% Panama - Sixaola 18.5% 25.6% 0.0% N.A. America - St. Croix 64.9% 48.6% 100.0% 100.0% Russia - Canada - St. John Jenisej/Yenisey 87.2% 76.5% 97.1% 96.8% Kyrgyzstan - Talas 20.7% 25.1% 68.6% 21.2% (North America) 63.5% 82.1% 59.9% 0.0% Panama - Jurado 29.4% 33.4% N.A. N.A. Finland - Tana 41.1% 37.1% 83.8% N.A. Canada - St. Lawrence 53.0% 39.4% 55.5% 30.8% A10-13 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area India - Kaladan United States of 24.2% 20.4% 29.2% 67.1% Norway - Tana 58.9% 62.9% 16.2% N.A. America - St. Lawrence 47.0% 60.6% 44.5% 69.2% Myanmar (Burma) - Kaladan Iran - Tigris- 75.8% 79.6% 70.8% 32.9% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 19.7% 17.1% 26.2% 12.9% Canada - Stikine 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Bangladesh - Jordan - Tigris- Karnaphuli Euphrates/Shatt al United States of 59.0% 86.7% 43.3% 74.9% Arab** 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% America - Stikine 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. India - Karnaphuli Syria - Tigris- 40.8% 13.3% 56.7% 25.1% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 14.7% 16.2% 1.4% 17.1% Portugal - Tagus/Tejo 33.5% 33.9% 55.4% 42.1% Moldova - Kogilnik Finland - 57.1% 82.1% 89.7% 100.0% Torne/Tornealven 28.6% 36.4% 43.2% N.A. Spain - Tagus/Tejo 66.5% 66.1% 44.6% 57.9% Ivory Coast - Komoe Norway - 74.6% 67.6% 79.8% 60.5% Torne/Tornealven 3.8% 1.1% 26.3% N.A. Canada - Taku 90.2% 57.1% 100.0% N.A. Iran - Kowl E United States of Namaksar 71.2% 93.4% 100.0% 97.0% Ecuador - Tumbes** 71.1% 74.3% 100.0% 82.3% America - Taku 9.8% 42.9% 0.0% N.A. Algeria - Lake Chad** Iraq - Tigris- 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Peru - Tumbes** 28.9% 25.7% 0.0% 17.7% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 40.5% 45.0% 19.1% 55.2% Libya - Lake Chad** Turkey - Tigris- 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Tumen 69.7% 70.3% 50.1% 67.6% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab 24.8% 21.7% 53.3% 14.8% Sudan - Lake Chad** Korea, Democratic People's Republic of United States of 3.5% 6.7% 4.8% 4.5% (North) - Tumen 28.6% 29.6% 49.9% 32.4% America - Tijuana 26.7% 4.2% N.A. 16.0% Argentina - Lake Sweden - Fagnano 85.0% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Russia - Tumen 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Torne/Tornealven 67.7% 62.6% 30.5% N.A. Chile - Lake Fagnano Mozambique - 15.0% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Albania - Vijose 64.5% 93.8% 55.3% 85.5% Umbeluzi 67.3% 92.6% 4.0% 20.0% A10-14 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Kenya - Lake Natron 33.0% 39.8% 27.0% 0.0% Greece - Vijose 35.5% 6.2% 44.7% 14.5% Swaziland - Umbeluzi 32.5% 7.4% 96.0% 80.0% Tanzania, United Republic of - Lake Czech Republic - South Africa - Natron 67.0% 60.2% 73.0% 100.0% Vistula/Wista 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Umbeluzi** 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Sudan - Lake Turkana** 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Byelarus - Volga 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Canada - Whiting 76.9% N.A. N.A. N.A. Mongolia - Lake Ubsa- United States of Nur 75.9% 78.7% 86.6% 63.1% Kazakhstan - Volga 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% America - Whiting 23.1% N.A. N.A. N.A. Sierra Leone - Little United States of Scarcies 69.0% 83.3% 69.5% 100.0% Russia - Volga 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% America - Yukon 60.2% 77.1% 63.0% 100.0% Indonesia - Loes 16.3% 6.6% N.A. 0.0% Benin - Volta 3.6% 2.7% 5.3% 2.9% Angola - Zambezi 18.4% 1.1% 22.1% 0.0% Timor Leste - Loes Tanzania, United 83.7% 93.4% N.A. 100.0% Burkina Faso - Volta 42.1% 48.4% 24.6% 30.1% Republic of - Zambezi 2.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.2% Liberia - Loffa 88.5% 66.6% 100.0% N.A. Ghana - Volta 40.2% 37.0% 47.3% 60.6% Zambia - Zambezi 41.6% 27.4% 54.9% 55.0% Ethiopia - Lotagipi Swamp** 8.4% 7.3% 40.3% N.A. Mali - Volta 4.6% 2.7% 1.0% 0.9% Botswana - Zambezi** 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Kenya - Lotagipi Swamp** 52.4% 63.5% 29.4% N.A. Togo - Volta 6.3% 7.9% 20.1% 3.9% Namibia - Zambezi** 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Uganda - Lotagipi Swamp** 5.1% 10.2% 0.0% N.A. Finland - Vuoksa 86.4% 98.6% 93.9% 100.0% Ecuador - Zarumilla** 78.7% 71.4% N.A. 88.4% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ma 43.8% 11.5% 44.2% 16.0% Russia - Vuoksa 13.6% 1.4% 6.1% 0.0% Peru - Zarumilla** 21.3% 28.6% N.A. 11.6% Vietnam - Ma 56.2% 88.5% 55.8% 84.0% Colombia - Mataje 28.6% 43.5% N.A. 0.0% Ecuador - Mataje 71.4% 56.5% N.A. 100.0% Equatorial Guinea - Mbe 7.1% 31.7% 0.0% N.A. Tunisia - Medjerda 66.7% 67.0% 77.7% 90.2% Colombia - Mira 51.8% 38.7% 85.5% 1.3% A10-15 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Ecuador - Mira 48.2% 61.3% 14.5% 98.7% Russia - Mius 70.4% 75.8% 0.0% 0.0% Ukraine - Mius 29.6% 24.2% 100.0% 100.0% Liberia - Moa 13.1% 7.5% 0.0% N.A. Belize - Moho 76.1% 74.6% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Moho 23.9% 25.4% N.A. N.A. Benin - Mono 5.0% 14.4% 0.0% 2.3% Togo - Mono 95.0% 85.6% 100.0% 97.7% Guatemala - Motaqua 88.5% 96.4% 91.3% 100.0% Honduras - Motaqua 11.5% 3.6% 8.7% 0.0% Afghanistan - Murgab 59.8% 66.3% 90.0% 18.0% Turkmenistan - Murgab 40.2% 33.7% 10.0% 82.0% Honduras - Negro 10.7% 24.3% 59.4% 0.5% Nicaragua - Negro 89.3% 75.7% 40.6% 99.5% Croatia - Neretva 3.5% 3.1% 0.0% 2.5% Algeria - Niger** 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Nyanga 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% N.A. Gabon - Nyanga 93.4% 97.3% 100.0% N.A. Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Ogooue 11.9% 13.8% 10.2% 0.0% Equatorial Guinea - Ogooue 0.9% 4.6% 1.8% 0.0% Gabon - Ogooue 84.9% 78.4% 87.0% 100.0% Brazil - Oiapoque/Oyupock 40.2% 74.6% 34.0% N.A. A10-16 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area French Guiana - Oiapoque/Oyupock 59.8% 25.4% 66.0% N.A. Zimbabwe - Okavango 3.2% 13.9% 0.3% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Oral/Ural 56.5% 30.3% 47.4% 94.8% Russia - Oral/Ural 43.5% 69.7% 52.6% 5.2% Brazil - Orinoco 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Orinoco 34.7% 16.6% 36.2% 42.5% Venezuela - Orinoco 65.2% 83.4% 63.8% 57.5% Algeria - Oued Bon Naima** 36.6% 33.8% N.A. 15.2% Morocco - Oued Bon Naima** 63.4% 66.2% N.A. 84.8% Togo - Oueme** 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Oulu 6.8% 0.4% 6.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Pakchan 51.1% 30.5% 47.7% 31.9% Thailand - Pakchan 48.9% 69.5% 52.3% 68.1% Argentina - Palena 45.0% 24.0% 9.3% N.A. Chile - Palena 55.0% 76.0% 90.7% N.A. Brunei - Pandaruan 58.0% 92.2% N.A. N.A. Malaysia - Pandaruan 42.0% 7.8% N.A. N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Pangani 97.4% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Parnu 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Argentina - Pascua 46.1% 36.0% 41.5% N.A. Chile - Pascua 53.9% 64.0% 58.5% N.A. Colombia - Patia 97.6% 90.9% 100.0% 78.9% Ecuador - Patia 2.4% 9.1% 0.0% 21.1% Poland - Prohladnaja 22.9% 13.6% N.A. 0.0% A10-17 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Russia - Prohladnaja 77.1% 86.4% N.A. 100.0% Russia - Pu Lun T'o 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Argentina - Puelo 65.8% 88.0% 73.3% 100.0% Chile - Puelo 34.2% 12.0% 26.7% 0.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Red/Song Hong 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Red/Song Hong 45.6% 61.6% 57.3% 44.7% Liechtenstein - Rhine 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% 0.0% Argentina - Rio Grande (South America) 49.6% 85.1% 30.4% N.A. Chile - Rio Grande (South America) 50.4% 14.9% 69.6% N.A. Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Saigon 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Saigon 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% China - Salween 52.4% 46.6% 45.7% 68.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Salween 43.8% 51.1% 46.5% 27.2% Thailand - Salween 3.7% 2.3% 7.8% 4.8% Azerbaijan - Samur 6.5% 2.5% 0.0% 14.2% Russia - Samur 93.5% 97.5% 100.0% 85.8% Costa Rica - San Juan 30.1% 11.5% 46.0% 30.2% Nicaragua - San Juan 69.9% 88.5% 54.0% 69.8% Argentina - San Martin 12.2% 57.9% N.A. N.A. Chile - San Martin 87.8% 42.1% N.A. N.A. A10-18 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Belize - Sarstun 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Sarstun 93.4% 99.4% 100.0% N.A. Indonesia - Sembakung 52.9% 18.5% 83.5% 100.0% Malaysia - Sembakung 47.1% 81.5% 16.5% 0.0% Argentina - Seno Union/Serrano 10.3% 1.1% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Seno Union/Serrano 89.7% 98.9% 100.0% N.A. Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Song Vam Co Dong 49.2% 38.6% 36.5% 19.2% Vietnam - Song Vam Co Dong 50.8% 61.4% 63.5% 80.8% Guinea - St. John (Africa) 16.9% 21.1% 27.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. John (Africa) 83.0% 78.9% 73.0% 100.0% Liberia - St. Paul 55.5% 44.9% 63.7% 100.0% China - Sujfun 64.7% 60.0% 64.3% 60.2% Russia - Sujfun 35.3% 40.0% 35.7% 39.8% Azerbaijan - Sulak 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Sulak 92.4% 99.7% 74.4% 100.0% Morocco - Tafna** 25.4% 39.1% 0.0% 41.2% Indonesia - Tami 97.6% 97.8% 95.6% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tami 2.4% 2.2% 4.4% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Tano 10.9% 5.9% 31.5% 100.0% Afghanistan - Tarim 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Tarim 97.2% 99.8% 58.4% 99.5% A10-19 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Kyrgyzstan - Tarim 2.0% 0.1% 39.0% 0.5% Tajikistan - Tarim 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Tarim** 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% Belize - Temash 85.0% 50.3% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Temash 15.0% 49.7% N.A. N.A. Russia - Terek 95.3% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% Lesotho - Thukela 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% South Africa - Thukela 99.7% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Saudi Arabia - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Indonesia - Tjeroaka- Wanggoe 62.4% 97.9% 45.0% N.A. Papua New Guinea - Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 37.6% 2.1% 55.0% N.A. Finland - Tuloma 7.9% 0.0% 15.7% N.A. Russia - Tuloma 92.1% 100.0% 84.3% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Umba 83.1% 88.1% 12.0% 100.0% Kenya - Umba** 16.9% 11.9% 88.0% 0.0% Equatorial Guinea - Utamboni 40.9% 69.9% 43.9% N.A. Argentina - Valdivia 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Lithuania - Venta 35.1% 65.7% 46.5% N.A. Denmark - Wiedau 85.0% 88.4% N.A. 100.0% Germany - Wiedau 15.0% 11.6% N.A. 0.0% China - Yalu 52.9% 58.6% 50.7% 47.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Yalu 47.1% 41.4% 49.3% 52.9% A10-20 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Argentina - Yelcho 62.2% 82.5% 42.0% 100.0% Chile - Yelcho 37.8% 17.5% 58.0% 0.0% Belgium - Yser 47.5% 53.1% N.A. 0.0% Argentina - Zapaleri** 19.8% 2.4% 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Zapaleri** 21.7% 19.5% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Zapaleri** 58.5% 78.1% 0.0% N.A. A10-21 Appendix 10 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Middle climate scenario Figure A10-1. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience high increases in runoff variability for 2050. A10-22 Figure A10-2. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience moderate increases in runoff variability for 2050. A10-23 Figure A10-3. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience little or no increase in runoff variability for 2050. A10-24 Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario The data in this appendix are organized by risk levels as diagrammed in Figure 8 of the main text. Country-basin units are listed alphabetically in each category of combined vulnerability and hazard. In addition, the relative importance of the basin in several dimensions appear to the right of each CBU. The percentages listed are the proportions of the basin that the CBU contributes to the basin total for each variable (area from TFDD; population from Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2008; runoff from Fekete, Vorosmarty and Grabs 2000; irrigated area from Doll and Siebert 2001). CBUs marked with a "**" had a high present hazard level. CBUs marked with a "*" had a medium present hazard level. CBUs with no asterisks had a low present hazard level. Figures A11-1, A11-2 and A11-3 show the hazard-vulnerability combinations used in the main text. High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Ethiopia - Awash* France - Bidasoa Canada - Firth* High Hazard 92.7% 99.5% 100.0% 99.7% 12.5% 22.5% N.A. N.A. 59.6% N.A. 0.0% N.A. Iran - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* * 99.8% 99.8% N.A. 100.0% Spain - Bidasoa 87.5% 77.5% N.A. N.A. Gambia, The - Gambia* 8.5% 28.5% 12.5% 68.8% Sudan - Baraka* 37.3% 9.3% N.A. 80.9% Guatemala - Candelaria* 14.5% 3.3% 0.0% N.A. Senegal - Gambia* 72.6% 42.3% 57.8% 4.3% Belize - Belize India - Ganges- 61.9% 51.5% 83.5% 100.0% Mexico - Candelaria* 85.5% 96.7% 100.0% N.A. Brahmaputra-Meghna 62.3% 75.2% 58.1% 83.4% Guatemala - Belize Guatemala - Coatan 38.1% 48.5% 16.5% 0.0% Achute* 12.6% 17.4% N.A. 0.0% Spain - Garonne* 1.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Gabon - Benito/Ntem 23.9% 11.9% 15.0% N.A. Mexico - Coatan Achute* 87.4% 82.6% N.A. 100.0% Namibia - Kunene** 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% Ghana - Bia* Central African Republic - 58.9% 60.4% 37.4% 0.0% Congo/Zaire 10.9% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% Guinea - Niger 4.5% 2.3% 14.8% 0.8% Colombia - Catatumbo* 63.3% 73.0% 62.2% 82.4% Guinea - Corubal* 72.9% 88.7% 66.2% 0.0% Mali - Senegal* 34.6% 36.5% 49.0% 13.1% Venezuela - Catatumbo* 36.7% 27.0% 37.8% 17.6% Latvia - Daugava 34.3% 29.8% 29.1% 0.0% Senegal - Senegal* 8.1% 16.4% 8.3% 22.9% Guinea - Cavally* 4.2% 8.8% 5.6% 0.0% Lithuania - Daugava* 1.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% Greece - Struma* 26.2% 22.3% 18.7% 31.3% Guinea - Cestos* United States of America - 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Dnieper 24.1% 19.7% 37.2% 2.3% Tijuana* 26.7% 4.2% N.A. 16.0% Morocco - Daoura** 52.7% 98.8% N.A. 100.0% France - Ebro 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% Morocco - Dra* 78.6% 99.7% 100.0% 96.0% Spain - Ebro 99.2% 97.8% 100.0% 99.7% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-1 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Andorra - Ebro* 0.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Gambia* 18.9% 29.3% 29.7% 26.9% Andorra - Garonne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Geba* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Belize - Grijalva 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Senegal - Geba* 32.2% 35.1% 20.9% 0.0% Belize - Hondo* 13.0% 6.9% 7.8% 2.3% Guatemala - Grijalva 38.3% 37.7% 43.7% 3.5% Ghana - Komoe* 2.9% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% Mexico - Grijalva* 61.6% 62.3% 56.3% 96.5% Iran - Kowl E Namaksar* 71.2% 93.4% 100.0% 97.0% Iran - Helmand* 15.5% 12.5% 0.3% 25.3% Georgia - Kura-Araks* 17.7% 19.0% 33.5% 22.3% Guatemala - Hondo* 29.8% 1.8% 51.5% 0.0% Turkey - Kura-Araks* 14.3% 7.0% 29.8% 12.4% Mexico - Hondo* 57.2% 91.3% 40.7% 97.7% Guinea - Loffa Kyrgyzstan - Ili/Kunes 11.5% 33.4% 0.0% N.A. He* 5.5% 1.0% 24.5% 5.1% Greece - Maritsa* 7.6% 3.1% 4.0% 11.8% Byelarus - Neman 46.4% 44.3% 46.1% 98.4% Algeria - Medjerda* 33.3% 33.0% 22.3% 9.8% Lithuania - Neman 43.8% 48.9% 42.5% 0.0% Belize - Moho 76.1% 74.6% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Neman* 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Guatemala - Moho 23.9% 25.4% N.A. N.A. Poland - Neman* 4.2% 3.6% 5.2% 1.6% Greece - Nestos* Central African Republic - 46.6% 38.4% 45.1% 68.2% Nile* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Okavango* 3.2% 13.9% 0.3% 0.0% Bulgaria - Rezvaya* 18.4% 2.3% N.A. N.A. Malawi - Ruvuma* 0.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% Turkey - Rezvaya* 81.6% 97.7% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Salaca 94.5% 98.6% 100.0% N.A. Guatemala - Suchiate* 73.5% 65.8% 0.0% 60.0% Cameroon - Sanaga 99.0% 99.5% 98.1% 100.0% Mexico - Suchiate* 26.5% 34.2% 100.0% 40.0% Nigeria - Sanaga Jordan - Tigris- 0.4% 0.4% 1.9% 0.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Central African Republic - Sanaga* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Vistula/Wista* 5.1% 2.4% 2.9% 8.8% Guinea - Sassandra* 12.3% 6.5% 22.6% 0.0% Mexico - Yaqui** 94.1% 94.8% 100.0% 97.7% Algeria - Tafna* 74.6% 60.9% 100.0% 58.8% Guinea-Bissau - Corubal* 27.1% 11.3% 33.8% 100.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-2 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Morocco - Tafna** 25.4% 39.1% 0.0% 41.2% Guinea-Bissau - Gambia* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Papua New Guinea - Tjeroaka-Wanggoe 37.6% 2.1% 55.0% N.A. Guinea-Bissau - Geba* 67.4% 64.6% 79.1% 100.0% Bulgaria - Velaka* 94.4% 95.0% N.A. N.A. Cameroon - Akpa Lebanon - An Nahr Al Moderate Hazard 62.1% 40.1% 73.8% 100.0% Kabir* 32.6% 38.4% 100.0% 60.6% Kazakhstan - Aral Sea* 34.5% 5.2% 8.8% 31.1% Nigeria - Akpa 37.9% 59.9% 26.2% 0.0% Syria - An Nahr Al Kabir* 67.4% 61.6% 0.0% 39.4% Mexico - Colorado* 1.6% 5.4% 0.0% 14.4% Turkey - Asi/Orontes* Dominican Republic - United States of America - 49.9% 31.3% 54.7% 46.2% Artibonite* 27.2% 10.0% 45.3% 19.2% Colorado* 98.4% 94.6% 100.0% 85.6% Azerbaijan - Astara Chay* United States of America - 17.4% 27.1% N.A. 0.0% Syria - Asi/Orontes* 44.3% 65.6% 42.3% 49.0% Columbia 84.7% 93.9% 69.0% 96.1% Iran - Astara Chay* Bosnia and Herzegovina - 82.6% 72.9% N.A. 100.0% Iran - Atrak* 68.9% 95.0% 97.1% 95.8% Danube 4.9% 4.7% 10.0% 0.2% Djibouti - Awash** 7.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Daugava 48.3% 64.7% 57.1% 100.0% Spain - Douro/Duero* 81.8% 49.6% 61.7% 77.9% Somalia - Awash** Bhutan - Ganges- 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% Brahmaputra-Meghna 2.4% 0.4% 3.4% 0.2% Canada - Fraser 99.8% 99.6% 100.0% 99.4% Latvia - Barta United States of America - 61.8% 39.7% 100.0% N.A. Sweden - Glama 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Fraser 0.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% Lithuania - Barta Kazakhstan - Ili/Kunes Bangladesh - Ganges- 38.2% 60.3% 0.0% N.A. He* 60.2% 48.0% 64.8% 67.7% Brahmaputra-Meghna 6.6% 19.6% 8.0% 9.7% China - Bei Jiang/Hsi 97.6% 98.9% 97.3% 99.6% Afghanistan - Indus* 6.3% 4.6% 9.6% 1.3% France - Garonne 98.8% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Cameroon - Benito/Ntem 42.0% 52.3% 31.2% N.A. Egypt - Jordan** 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Portugal - Guadiana* 18.9% 17.4% 38.8% 11.8% Vietnam - Ca/Song-Koi 64.8% 95.7% 49.0% 90.9% Sweden - Klaralven 84.8% 97.6% 82.0% 70.0% Spain - Guadiana* 81.1% 82.6% 61.2% 88.2% Honduras - Chamelecon* 97.2% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Greece - Lake Prespa* 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0% Mozambique - Incomati** 31.3% 18.1% 0.0% 36.2% Honduras - Choluteca* 96.6% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% Kenya - Lake Turkana* 43.3% 17.7% 20.4% 14.9% Pakistan - Indus* 52.5% 60.4% 10.1% 60.1% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-3 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Nicaragua - Choluteca* 3.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Poland - Lava/Pregel* 24.7% 15.5% 21.2% 100.0% Israel - Jordan* 27.0% 4.2% 42.5% 31.3% Honduras - Coco/Segovia* 24.3% 7.4% 43.4% 7.3% El Salvador - Lempa* 56.5% 85.0% 38.7% 92.4% Mozambique - Maputo* 5.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.8% Nicaragua - Coco/Segovia* 75.7% 92.6% 56.6% 92.7% Guatemala - Lempa* 14.0% 7.3% 36.0% 6.9% Cameroon - Niger 4.2% 4.2% 11.4% 5.6% Georgia - Coruh 8.9% 20.5% 11.7% 0.0% Honduras - Lempa* 29.5% 7.7% 25.3% 0.7% Nigeria - Niger 26.6% 66.4% 59.8% 15.6% Turkey - Coruh* 91.1% 79.5% 88.3% 100.0% Latvia - Lielupe 66.5% 67.2% 65.9% N.A. Benin - Niger* 2.1% 1.4% 3.0% 0.6% Cameroon - Cross 23.7% 5.6% 36.5% 0.0% Lithuania - Lielupe 33.5% 32.8% 34.1% N.A. Chad - Niger* 0.8% 1.0% 0.8% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Ganges-Brahmaputra- Meghna 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Botswana - Limpopo* 19.6% 8.1% 0.0% 6.0% Ivory Coast - Niger* 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.1% Latvia - Gauja 90.4% 97.8% 100.0% N.A. Zimbabwe - Limpopo** 15.1% 5.5% 8.7% 7.4% Mali - Niger* 25.6% 9.6% 5.9% 59.4% El Salvador - Goascoran* 47.7% 71.9% 51.1% 0.0% Turkey - Maritsa* 25.9% 29.5% 37.9% 21.0% China - Ob* 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 1.5% Honduras - Goascoran* Dominican Republic - 52.3% 28.1% 48.9% 100.0% Massacre* 45.7% 23.0% 0.0% 61.1% Mongolia - Ob** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Morocco - Guir** 22.5% 16.5% N.A. 14.5% Haiti - Massacre* 54.3% 77.0% 100.0% 38.9% Germany - Oder/Odra* 6.2% 4.1% 4.0% 24.3% Russia - Har Us Nur* 3.0% 2.4% 2.1% 0.0% Guinea - Moa 39.3% 37.5% 39.9% N.A. Lesotho - Orange* 2.1% 12.8% 37.5% 0.7% Iran - Hari/Harirud* 38.3% 56.4% 31.7% 63.9% Byelarus - Narva 1.6% 0.4% 0.0% N.A. South Africa - Orange* 59.7% 84.3% 62.5% 60.1% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Krka 12.8% 3.2% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Narva 11.1% 13.9% 15.6% N.A. Namibia - Orange** 25.4% 1.6% 0.0% 35.9% Croatia - Krka 87.2% 96.8% N.A. N.A. Russia - Narva 53.4% 52.1% 41.4% N.A. Switzerland - Po 5.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% Tanzania, United Republic of - Lake Mexico - Rio Grande Natron* 67.0% 60.2% 73.0% 100.0% Russia - Neman 5.3% 2.9% 6.3% 0.0% (North America)* 48.2% 75.4% 50.1% 68.5% Russia - Lake Ubsa-Nur Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 24.1% 21.3% 13.4% 36.9% Nile* 0.7% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% Canada - Skagit 11.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Guinea - Little Scarcies United States of America - 31.0% 16.7% 30.5% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Ob* 25.2% 22.8% 9.2% 86.1% Skagit 88.3% 99.6% 100.0% 100.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-4 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Sierra Leone - Little Scarcies 69.0% 83.3% 69.5% 100.0% El Salvador - Paz* 45.8% 71.0% N.A. 76.0% Portugal - Tagus/Tejo* 33.5% 33.9% 55.4% 42.1% Sudan - Lotagipi Swamp** 34.1% 18.9% 30.2% N.A. Guatemala - Paz* 54.2% 29.0% N.A. 24.0% Spain - Tagus/Tejo* 66.5% 66.1% 44.6% 57.9% Equatorial Guinea - Mbe Iraq - Tigris- 7.1% 31.7% 0.0% N.A. France - Roia* 67.2% 34.2% N.A. 14.3% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 40.5% 45.0% 19.1% 55.2% Gabon - Mbe Turkey - Tigris- 92.9% 68.3% 100.0% N.A. Italy - Roia* 32.8% 65.8% N.A. 85.7% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 24.8% 21.7% 53.3% 14.8% Tunisia - Medjerda* 66.7% 67.0% 77.7% 90.2% Mozambique - Ruvuma* 65.2% 26.4% 71.8% 75.6% Mozambique - Umbeluzi* 67.3% 92.6% 4.0% 20.0% Guatemala - Motaqua 88.5% 96.4% 91.3% 100.0% Guinea - Senegal* 7.1% 14.7% 40.7% 1.2% Canada - Yukon 39.8% 22.9% 37.0% 0.0% Honduras - Motaqua* 11.5% 3.6% 8.7% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Shu/Chu* 93.0% 27.3% 92.5% 87.0% Malawi - Zambezi* 8.0% 35.2% 6.0% 3.7% Turkey - Nahr El Kebir* Iran - Tigris- 13.6% 6.5% N.A. 0.0% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 19.7% 17.1% 26.2% 12.9% Mozambique - Zambezi* 11.8% 7.6% 6.8% 17.2% Honduras - Negro* Norway - 10.7% 24.3% 59.4% 0.5% Torne/Tornealven 3.8% 1.1% 26.3% N.A. Zimbabwe - Zambezi* 15.5% 23.7% 8.2% 23.7% Bosnia and Herzegovina - Neretva 96.5% 96.9% 100.0% 97.5% Russia - Tumen* 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Oral/Ural 43.5% 69.7% 52.6% 5.2% Greece - Vardar* 12.0% 4.9% 0.0% 19.9% Algeria - Oued Bon Naima** 36.6% 33.8% N.A. 15.2% Poland - Vistula/Wista* 87.2% 88.9% 89.2% 90.9% Morocco - Oued Bon Naima** 63.4% 66.2% N.A. 84.8% Latvia - Parnu 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Mozambique - Pungwe* 94.3% 92.8% 77.0% 100.0% Zimbabwe - Pungwe* 5.7% 7.2% 23.0% 0.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-5 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Moldova - Sarata* 37.0% 57.2% 100.0% 100.0% Ukraine - Sarata* 63.0% 42.8% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Sassandra 87.7% 93.5% 77.4% 100.0% Guinea - St. Paul* 44.5% 55.1% 36.3% 0.0% South Africa - Thukela* 99.7% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% Indonesia - Tjeroaka- Wanggoe* 62.4% 97.9% 45.0% N.A. Equatorial Guinea - Utamboni 40.9% 69.9% 43.9% N.A. Gabon - Utamboni 59.1% 30.1% 56.1% N.A. Argentina - Valdivia* 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Valdivia* 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Turkey - Velaka* 5.6% 5.0% N.A. N.A. Latvia - Venta 64.9% 34.3% 53.5% N.A. Lithuania - Venta 35.1% 65.7% 46.5% N.A. Israel - Wadi Al Izziyah* 32.2% 26.2% 100.0% 37.2% Argentina - Zapaleri** 19.8% 2.4% 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Zapaleri** 21.7% 19.5% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Zapaleri** 58.5% 78.1% 0.0% N.A. Guyana - Amacuro* Brazil - Amazon Canada - Alsek Low Hazard 13.1% 85.0% 0.0% N.A. 62.4% 31.4% 76.0% 3.6% 93.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Venezuela - Amacuro* 86.9% 15.0% 100.0% N.A. Colombia - Amazon 6.3% 3.5% 11.7% 5.7% China - Amur* 42.6% 94.4% 26.6% 83.4% French Guiana - Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Guyana - Amazon 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Mongolia - Amur* 9.1% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Amur* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Peru - Amazon 16.3% 35.1% 6.8% 54.1% Kyrgyzstan - Aral Sea* 9.1% 5.8% 23.4% 4.2% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-6 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area China - Aral Sea* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Venezuela - Amazon 0.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% Tajikistan - Aral Sea* 11.0% 15.3% 22.4% 10.7% Mauritania - Atui** 64.6% 86.8% N.A. N.A. Bolivia - Amazon* 12.0% 23.8% 4.4% 11.9% Uzbekistan - Aral Sea* 31.1% 58.8% 9.3% 46.4% Western Sahara - Atui** 35.4% 13.2% N.A. N.A. Ecuador - Amazon* 2.1% 6.1% 0.6% 24.7% Canada - Chilkat 49.5% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Argentina - Aviles* United States of America - 88.8% 94.1% N.A. N.A. Suriname - Amazon* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chilkat 50.5% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Chile - Aviles* 11.2% 5.9% N.A. N.A. Russia - Amur 48.2% 5.3% 72.8% 16.0% Canada - Columbia 15.3% 6.1% 31.0% 3.9% Argentina - Aysen Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - 4.1% 0.1% 0.0% N.A. Afghanistan - Aral Sea* 8.5% 12.1% 34.3% 2.8% Congo/Zaire 62.4% 75.4% 66.5% 96.8% Chile - Aysen 95.9% 99.9% 100.0% N.A. Turkmenistan - Aral Sea* 5.7% 2.7% 1.8% 4.8% Austria - Danube 10.3% 9.4% 26.5% 5.7% Pakistan - BahuKalat/Rudkhanehye* 0.2% 0.2% N.A. 0.0% Haiti - Artibonite* 72.8% 90.0% 54.7% 80.8% Germany - Danube 7.5% 11.9% 10.7% 0.8% Argentina - Baker* 31.6% 26.9% 26.3% 9.6% Lebanon - Asi/Orontes* 5.8% 3.1% 3.0% 4.8% Montenegro - Danube 0.9% 0.3% 3.0% 0.0% Chile - Baker* 68.4% 73.1% 73.7% 90.4% Turkmenistan - Atrak* 31.1% 5.0% 2.9% 4.2% Romania - Danube 29.0% 26.8% 12.2% 63.6% Brunei - Bangau 54.4% 23.0% N.A. N.A. Ecuador - Chira** 38.1% 27.4% 59.7% 30.4% Slovakia - Danube 5.8% 6.3% 4.4% 7.5% Malaysia - Bangau 45.6% 77.0% N.A. N.A. Peru - Chira** 61.9% 72.6% 40.3% 69.6% Slovenia - Danube 2.2% 2.2% 6.2% 0.3% Ireland - Bann 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Cameroon - Congo/Zaire 2.3% 0.8% 2.1% 0.0% Bulgaria - Danube* 5.2% 4.0% 7.0% 4.7% United Kingdom - Bann Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - 97.1% 99.3% 100.0% 100.0% Congo/Zaire 6.7% 2.5% 8.0% 0.0% Croatia - Danube* 4.5% 3.9% 7.9% 0.0% Eritrea - Baraka* Czech Republic - 62.7% 90.7% N.A. 19.1% Angola - Congo/Zaire* 7.9% 1.9% 7.6% 0.0% Danube* 2.6% 3.2% 1.1% 1.0% Guyana - Barima* 52.2% 99.3% 100.0% N.A. Burundi - Congo/Zaire* 0.4% 4.6% 0.2% 0.5% Hungary - Danube* 11.7% 12.2% 1.9% 7.8% Venezuela - Barima* 47.8% 0.7% 0.0% N.A. Rwanda - Congo/Zaire* 0.1% 2.2% 0.1% 0.2% Moldova - Danube* 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 2.5% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-7 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Vietnam - Bei Jiang/Hsi* Tanzania, United Republic of - 2.4% 1.1% 2.7% 0.4% Congo/Zaire* 4.5% 5.9% 1.9% 2.0% Poland - Danube* 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% China - Beilun* 84.0% 69.2% 100.0% 95.8% Zambia - Congo/Zaire* 4.8% 2.8% 6.0% 0.5% Serbia - Danube* 9.4% 10.0% 4.7% 1.0% Vietnam - Beilun* 16.0% 30.8% 0.0% 4.2% Argentina - Cullen* 17.1% 9.9% 0.0% N.A. Ukraine - Danube* 3.7% 3.3% 3.0% 4.9% Equatorial Guinea - Benito/Ntem 34.1% 35.8% 53.9% N.A. Chile - Cullen* 82.9% 90.1% 100.0% N.A. Portugal - Douro/Duero* 18.2% 50.4% 38.3% 22.1% Ivory Coast - Bia* 41.1% 39.6% 62.6% 100.0% Albania - Danube 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Poland - Elbe 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Mozambique - Buzi* 88.7% 76.3% 86.3% 52.2% Italy - Danube 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Czech Republic - Elbe* 36.1% 25.9% 38.4% 37.5% Zimbabwe - Buzi* 11.3% 23.7% 13.7% 47.8% Switzerland - Danube 0.3% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Germany - Elbe* 62.7% 73.2% 61.6% 62.5% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ca/Song- United States of America - Koi 35.2% 4.3% 51.0% 9.1% Russia - Daugava 16.1% 4.5% 13.8% 0.0% Firth* 40.4% N.A. 100.0% N.A. Bolivia - Nepal - Ganges- Cancoso/Lauca** 85.8% 96.2% 70.0% 100.0% Russia - Dnieper 17.8% 11.2% 22.8% 1.2% Brahmaputra-Meghna 9.0% 4.6% 11.9% 3.6% Chile - Cancoso/Lauca** 14.2% 3.8% 30.0% 0.0% Ukraine - Dnieper* 58.0% 69.1% 40.1% 96.5% China - Har Us Nur* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Argentina - Carmen Silva/Chico* 59.2% 97.2% 100.0% N.A. Moldova - Dniester* 24.6% 36.6% 2.2% 56.4% Mongolia - Har Us Nur* 96.8% 97.6% 97.9% 100.0% Chile - Carmen Silva/Chico* 40.8% 2.8% 0.0% N.A. Poland - Dniester* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% South Africa - Incomati* 62.3% 73.5% 100.0% 57.8% Ireland - Castletown 16.9% 40.7% 0.0% N.A. Ukraine - Dniester* 75.3% 63.4% 97.8% 43.6% Swaziland - Incomati* 6.3% 8.4% 0.0% 6.0% United Kingdom - Castletown 83.1% 59.3% 100.0% N.A. Albania - Drin* 45.6% 37.5% 56.5% 60.2% India - Indus* 33.7% 35.0% 61.3% 38.6% Ivory Coast - Cavally 54.6% 71.1% 45.3% 92.2% Macedonia - Drin* 13.2% 8.8% 6.4% 10.5% Jordan - Jordan* 57.1% 83.4% 20.6% 43.2% Liberia - Cavally 41.2% 20.1% 49.1% 7.8% Indonesia - Fly 6.7% 0.9% 0.0% N.A. Lebanon - Jordan* 2.1% 1.0% 26.9% 2.3% Liberia - Cestos 84.5% 40.8% 75.7% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Fly 93.3% 99.1% 100.0% N.A. Syria - Jordan* 13.3% 11.5% 10.0% 23.2% Ivory Coast - Cestos* 15.3% 59.1% 24.3% 0.0% Eritrea - Gash** 53.6% 44.8% 58.0% 10.0% Angola - Kunene* 86.7% 99.0% 100.0% 100.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-8 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Guatemala - Chamelecon* 2.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% Sudan - Gash** 23.9% 25.2% 0.0% 85.0% Argentina - La Plata* 27.7% 16.5% 11.2% 40.8% Costa Rica - Changuinola 7.2% 2.6% 0.0% 100.0% Norway - Glama 98.9% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Brazil - La Plata* 46.7% 70.2% 71.7% 29.5% Panama - Changuinola 92.8% 97.4% 100.0% 0.0% Guinea - Great Scarcies 74.7% 59.8% 48.6% 79.1% Paraguay - La Plata* 13.5% 9.8% 8.7% 24.6% Angola - Chiloango* Sierra Leone - Great 32.5% 5.7% 30.3% N.A. Scarcies 25.3% 40.2% 51.4% 20.9% Uruguay - La Plata* 3.8% 1.1% 5.5% 2.8% Congo, Democratic Republic of (Kinshasa) - Chiloango* 64.7% 92.7% 69.7% N.A. Afghanistan - Helmand* 81.5% 85.8% 98.3% 74.3% Brazil - Lagoon Mirim* 43.2% 53.8% 43.9% 65.8% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Chiloango* 2.8% 1.5% 0.0% N.A. China - Ili/Kunes He* 34.3% 51.0% 10.7% 27.2% Uruguay - Lagoon Mirim* 56.8% 46.2% 56.1% 34.2% Panama - Chiriqui Bolivia - Lake Titicaca- 96.1% 91.8% 100.0% 100.0% Italy - Isonzo 39.1% 68.5% 46.4% 41.2% Poopo System* 56.4% 49.9% 44.1% 81.6% Argentina - Comau Chile - Lake Titicaca- 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Slovenia - Isonzo 60.9% 31.5% 53.6% 58.8% Poopo System** 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Comau Peru - Lake Titicaca- 88.9% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Ethiopia - Juba-Shibeli* 45.7% 66.5% 66.8% 48.1% Poopo System* 42.9% 50.1% 55.9% 18.4% Gabon - Congo/Zaire 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kenya - Juba-Shibeli* 26.8% 14.0% 31.5% 3.9% Portugal - Lima* 48.2% 66.5% 100.0% 74.7% Malawi - Congo/Zaire* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Somalia - Juba-Shibeli** 27.5% 19.6% 1.6% 48.1% Spain - Lima* 51.8% 33.5% 0.0% 25.3% Sudan - Congo/Zaire* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Kemi* 94.4% 96.9% 96.3% N.A. Mozambique - Limpopo* 21.0% 7.5% 0.0% 47.9% Uganda - Congo/Zaire** 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Kemi* 5.6% 3.1% 3.7% N.A. South Africa - Limpopo* 44.3% 78.8% 91.3% 38.7% Brazil - Corantijn/Courantyne* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Klaralven 15.2% 2.4% 18.0% 30.0% South Africa - Maputo* 60.1% 39.4% 70.1% 36.8% Guyana - Corantijn/Courantyne* 52.0% 40.1% 38.9% N.A. Armenia - Kura-Araks* 15.3% 22.9% 7.7% 9.0% Swaziland - Maputo* 34.9% 59.7% 29.9% 62.4% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-9 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Suriname - Corantijn/Courantyne* Cambodia (Kampuchea) - 47.9% 59.9% 61.1% N.A. Azerbaijan - Kura-Araks* 32.0% 34.6% 12.2% 40.2% Mekong 20.1% 19.4% 20.0% 16.8% Costa Rica - Corredores/Colorado Laos, People's Democratic 95.4% 90.1% 100.0% 100.0% Iran - Kura-Araks* 20.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% Republic of - Mekong 25.1% 10.0% 36.4% 12.1% Nigeria - Cross 76.3% 94.4% 63.5% 100.0% Bolivia - La Plata* 8.3% 2.3% 2.9% 2.4% Thailand - Mekong 24.6% 41.3% 16.1% 26.8% Angola - Cuvelai/Etosha* 31.8% 16.1% 76.4% 0.0% Cameroon - Lake Chad* 2.0% 6.1% 12.9% 12.7% Vietnam - Mekong 4.8% 18.0% 6.7% 14.8% Namibia - Central African Republic - Cuvelai/Etosha* 68.2% 83.9% 23.6% 100.0% Lake Chad* 9.1% 2.8% 24.4% 0.0% Portugal - Mino* 4.2% 5.6% 0.0% 13.3% Algeria - Daoura** 47.3% 1.2% N.A. 0.0% Chad - Lake Chad* 45.7% 22.2% 38.0% 32.7% Spain - Mino* 95.8% 94.4% 100.0% 86.7% Iran - Dasht** 21.5% 4.4% N.A. 3.0% Nigeria - Lake Chad* 7.5% 56.5% 19.5% 26.3% Canada - Mississippi* 1.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Pakistan - Dasht** United States of America - 78.5% 95.6% N.A. 97.0% Niger - Lake Chad** 28.2% 5.7% 0.4% 23.8% Mississippi* 98.4% 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% Russia - Don Canada - Nelson- 87.2% 66.4% 82.6% 50.1% Albania - Lake Prespa* 88.1% 97.9% 100.0% 94.3% Saskatchewan 85.9% 87.6% 87.4% 94.3% Ukraine - Don* United States of America - 12.8% 33.6% 17.4% 49.9% Macedonia - Lake Prespa* 8.6% 1.8% 0.0% 4.7% Nelson-Saskatchewan* 14.1% 12.4% 12.6% 5.7% Algeria - Dra** 21.4% 0.3% 0.0% 4.0% Ethiopia - Lake Turkana* 54.8% 81.9% 79.4% 85.1% Burkina Faso - Niger* 3.9% 3.0% 1.0% 0.7% Montenegro - Drin 12.3% 7.4% 0.0% 3.2% Uganda - Lake Turkana* 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Niger - Niger** 23.6% 11.6% 0.8% 17.2% Serbia - Drin* 28.8% 46.3% 37.1% 26.1% Russia - Lava/Pregel 75.3% 84.5% 78.8% 0.0% Burundi - Nile* 0.4% 2.8% 0.8% 0.0% Russia - Elancik* 73.0% 56.6% N.A. 0.0% Liberia - Mana-Morro 83.4% 77.8% 100.0% N.A. Kenya - Nile* 1.7% 8.3% 6.0% 0.0% Ukraine - Elancik* Sierra Leone - Mana- 27.0% 43.4% N.A. 100.0% Morro 16.6% 22.2% 0.0% N.A. Rwanda - Nile* 0.7% 4.6% 1.8% 0.1% Austria - Elbe* 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Bulgaria - Maritsa* 66.5% 67.3% 58.1% 67.2% Sudan - Nile* 63.6% 18.9% 38.2% 77.4% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-10 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Ireland - Erne Tanzania, United 57.5% 56.6% 100.0% N.A. French Guiana - Maroni* 41.8% 54.7% 34.9% 100.0% Republic of - Nile* 4.0% 4.7% 4.8% 0.0% United Kingdom - Erne 42.5% 43.4% 0.0% N.A. Suriname - Maroni* 58.0% 45.3% 65.1% 0.0% Uganda - Nile* 7.9% 17.1% 6.9% 0.4% Venezuela - Essequibo 21.9% 12.6% 12.7% 0.0% China - Mekong 21.8% 10.2% 18.6% 26.8% Egypt - Nile** 9.2% 25.6% 0.0% 19.3% Brazil - Essequibo* Myanmar (Burma) - Czech Republic - 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mekong* 3.5% 1.2% 2.1% 2.8% Oder/Odra 8.4% 10.9% 6.5% 0.0% Guyana - Essequibo* 67.9% 83.1% 81.2% 66.8% Sierra Leone - Moa 47.6% 55.0% 60.1% N.A. Poland - Oder/Odra* 84.2% 84.4% 89.5% 75.4% Suriname - Essequibo* 10.1% 4.3% 6.1% 33.2% Finland - Naatamo 41.3% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Slovakia - Oder/Odra* 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% Ireland - Fane 86.0% 84.1% N.A. N.A. Norway - Naatamo 58.7% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Angola - Okavango* 21.2% 34.1% 92.0% 63.1% United Kingdom - Fane 14.0% 15.9% N.A. N.A. Estonia - Narva 33.8% 33.6% 43.0% N.A. Namibia - Okavango* 24.9% 21.8% 0.7% 27.0% Bangladesh - Fenney* 34.3% 75.6% 0.0% 47.9% Ethiopia - Nile 11.8% 16.4% 41.4% 2.8% Botswana - Okavango** 50.7% 30.2% 7.1% 9.9% India - Fenney* 65.7% 24.4% 100.0% 52.1% Eritrea - Nile** 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Botswana - Orange** 12.9% 1.3% 0.0% 3.3% Ireland - Flurry 48.2% 68.9% N.A. N.A. Russia - Ob 74.3% 76.7% 90.8% 12.4% Norway - Pasvik 6.3% 7.6% 0.0% N.A. United Kingdom - Flurry 51.8% 31.1% N.A. N.A. Russia - Olanga 89.5% 63.2% 87.4% N.A. Russia - Pasvik 16.5% 50.9% 0.0% N.A. Ireland - Foyle 31.6% 20.4% 50.0% N.A. Finland - Olanga* 10.5% 36.8% 12.6% N.A. Finland - Pasvik* 77.2% 41.6% 100.0% N.A. United Kingdom - Foyle 68.4% 79.6% 50.0% N.A. Benin - Oueme* 82.9% 81.8% 91.3% 89.4% Italy - Po 94.5% 98.1% 97.9% 99.5% Argentina - Gallegos/Chico* 60.7% 81.9% 0.0% N.A. Nigeria - Oueme* 16.4% 17.9% 8.7% 10.6% China - Pu Lun T'o* 87.5% 97.9% 100.0% 98.0% Chile - Gallegos/Chico* 39.3% 18.1% 100.0% N.A. France - Po* 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Mongolia - Pu Lun T'o* 12.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% China - Ganges- Brahmaputra-Meghna 19.7% 0.3% 18.6% 3.0% Italy - Rhine 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Austria - Rhine 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% Ethiopia - Gash** Tanzania, United 22.5% 30.0% 42.0% 5.0% Republic of - Ruvuma* 34.5% 70.8% 28.2% 24.4% Switzerland - Rhine 14.1% 11.2% 31.5% 24.6% Estonia - Gauja 9.6% 2.2% 0.0% N.A. Belgium - Schelde* 49.3% 56.5% 55.9% 36.8% Belgium - Rhine* 8.0% 5.3% 6.0% 5.1% Malaysia - Golok 43.6% 30.2% N.A. 10.9% France - Schelde* 50.2% 43.4% 44.1% 62.5% France - Rhine* 13.3% 7.3% 11.7% 8.3% Thailand - Golok 56.4% 69.8% N.A. 89.1% Netherlands - Schelde* 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% Germany - Rhine* 56.6% 66.1% 41.4% 36.5% Algeria - Guir** 77.5% 83.5% N.A. 85.5% Belgium - Seine* 2.2% 0.8% 7.0% 0.8% Luxembourg - Rhine* 1.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-11 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Han* 28.7% 4.4% 39.6% 30.9% France - Seine* 97.7% 99.0% 93.0% 99.2% Netherlands - Rhine* 5.7% 8.6% 2.1% 25.5% South Korea - Han* 71.3% 95.6% 60.4% 69.1% Luxembourg - Seine* 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% France - Rhone 89.6% 85.0% 76.7% 77.9% Afghanistan - Hari/Harirud* 44.3% 37.5% 68.3% 14.4% Indonesia - Sepik 3.3% 1.2% 0.0% N.A. Switzerland - Rhone 10.2% 15.0% 23.3% 22.1% Turkmenistan - United States of America - Hari/Harirud* Papua New Guinea - Rio Grande (North 17.4% 6.2% 0.0% 21.7% Sepik 96.7% 98.8% 100.0% N.A. America)* 51.8% 24.6% 49.9% 31.5% Pakistan - Helmand* 3.0% 1.7% 1.4% 0.4% Kyrgyzstan - Shu/Chu* 7.0% 72.7% 7.5% 13.0% Mauritania - Senegal** 50.3% 32.4% 2.0% 62.8% China - Indus* 7.5% 0.0% 19.0% 0.0% Costa Rica - Sixaola 81.5% 74.4% 100.0% N.A. Canada - St. Croix* 35.1% 51.4% 0.0% 0.0% China - Irrawaddy United States of America - 4.6% 4.2% 9.1% 7.7% Panama - Sixaola 18.5% 25.6% 0.0% N.A. St. Croix* 64.9% 48.6% 100.0% 100.0% India - Irrawaddy Canada - St. John (North 3.8% 3.1% 2.2% 2.7% Kazakhstan - Talas* 79.3% 74.9% 31.4% 78.8% America) 63.5% 82.1% 59.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Irrawaddy United States of America - 91.6% 92.7% 88.7% 89.6% Kyrgyzstan - Talas* 20.7% 25.1% 68.6% 21.2% St. John (North America)* 36.5% 17.9% 40.1% 100.0% Norway - Jacobs 68.3% 91.1% 100.0% N.A. Finland - Tana* 41.1% 37.1% 83.8% N.A. Canada - St. Lawrence 53.0% 39.4% 55.5% 30.8% Russia - Jacobs United States of America - 31.7% 8.9% 0.0% N.A. Norway - Tana* 58.9% 62.9% 16.2% N.A. St. Lawrence 47.0% 60.6% 44.5% 69.2% Mongolia - Jenisej/Yenisey Syria - Tigris- 12.8% 23.5% 2.9% 3.2% Euphrates/Shatt al Arab* 14.7% 16.2% 1.4% 17.1% Canada - Stikine 98.0% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Russia - Jenisej/Yenisey Finland - United States of America - 87.2% 76.5% 97.1% 96.8% Torne/Tornealven* 28.6% 36.4% 43.2% N.A. Stikine 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% N.A. Panama - Jurado 29.4% 33.4% N.A. N.A. Ecuador - Tumbes** 71.1% 74.3% 100.0% 82.3% Macedonia - Struma* 11.7% 13.5% 0.0% 16.1% India - Kaladan 24.2% 20.4% 29.2% 67.1% Peru - Tumbes** 28.9% 25.7% 0.0% 17.7% Serbia - Struma* 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-12 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Myanmar (Burma) - Kaladan 75.8% 79.6% 70.8% 32.9% China - Tumen* 69.7% 70.3% 50.1% 67.6% Canada - Taku 90.2% 57.1% 100.0% N.A. Bangladesh - Karnaphuli Korea, Democratic People's Republic of United States of America - 59.0% 86.7% 43.3% 74.9% (North) - Tumen* 28.6% 29.6% 49.9% 32.4% Taku 9.8% 42.9% 0.0% N.A. India - Karnaphuli 40.8% 13.3% 56.7% 25.1% Macedonia - Vardar* 63.5% 52.9% 75.1% 70.1% Mexico - Tijuana* 73.3% 95.8% N.A. 84.0% Moldova - Kogilnik* Sweden - 57.1% 82.1% 89.7% 100.0% Serbia - Vardar* 24.5% 42.2% 24.9% 10.0% Torne/Tornealven 67.7% 62.6% 30.5% N.A. Ukraine - Kogilnik* 42.9% 17.9% 10.3% 0.0% Albania - Vijose* 64.5% 93.8% 55.3% 85.5% Swaziland - Umbeluzi* 32.5% 7.4% 96.0% 80.0% Burkina Faso - Komoe* South Africa - 21.7% 21.3% 20.2% 39.5% Greece - Vijose* 35.5% 6.2% 44.7% 14.5% Umbeluzi** 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Komoe* Czech Republic - 74.6% 67.6% 79.8% 60.5% Vistula/Wista 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Ukraine - Vistula/Wista* 6.7% 7.9% 4.8% 0.0% Mali - Komoe* 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% Slovakia - Vistula/Wista* 1.0% 0.9% 3.1% 0.3% Canada - Whiting 76.9% N.A. N.A. N.A. Afghanistan - Kowl E United States of America - Namaksar* 28.8% 6.6% 0.0% 3.0% Russia - Volga 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% Whiting 23.1% N.A. N.A. N.A. Algeria - Lake Chad** United States of America - 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Byelarus - Volga* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Yukon* 60.2% 77.1% 63.0% 100.0% Libya - Lake Chad** 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kazakhstan - Volga* 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Angola - Zambezi* 18.4% 1.1% 22.1% 0.0% Sudan - Lake Chad** Tanzania, United 3.5% 6.7% 4.8% 4.5% Benin - Volta* 3.6% 2.7% 5.3% 2.9% Republic of - Zambezi* 2.0% 4.7% 1.7% 0.2% Argentina - Lake Fagnano* 85.0% 100.0% N.A. N.A. Burkina Faso - Volta* 42.1% 48.4% 24.6% 30.1% Zambia - Zambezi* 41.6% 27.4% 54.9% 55.0% Chile - Lake Fagnano* 15.0% 0.0% N.A. N.A. Ghana - Volta* 40.2% 37.0% 47.3% 60.6% Botswana - Zambezi** 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Kenya - Lake Natron* 33.0% 39.8% 27.0% 0.0% Mali - Volta* 4.6% 2.7% 1.0% 0.9% Namibia - Zambezi** 1.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Sudan - Lake Turkana** 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Togo - Volta* 6.3% 7.9% 20.1% 3.9% Ecuador - Zarumilla** 78.7% 71.4% N.A. 88.4% Mongolia - Lake Ubsa- Nur* 75.9% 78.7% 86.6% 63.1% Ivory Coast - Volta** 3.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% Peru - Zarumilla** 21.3% 28.6% N.A. 11.6% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-13 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Indonesia - Loes* 16.3% 6.6% N.A. 0.0% Finland - Vuoksa 86.4% 98.6% 93.9% 100.0% Timor Leste - Loes* 83.7% 93.4% N.A. 100.0% Russia - Vuoksa 13.6% 1.4% 6.1% 0.0% Liberia - Loffa United States of America - 88.5% 66.6% 100.0% N.A. Yaqui** 5.9% 5.2% 0.0% 2.3% Ethiopia - Lotagipi Congo, Democratic Swamp** Republic of (Kinshasa) - 8.4% 7.3% 40.3% N.A. Zambezi* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Kenya - Lotagipi Swamp** 52.4% 63.5% 29.4% N.A. Uganda - Lotagipi Swamp** 5.1% 10.2% 0.0% N.A. Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Ma* 43.8% 11.5% 44.2% 16.0% Vietnam - Ma* 56.2% 88.5% 55.8% 84.0% Brazil - Maroni* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Mataje* 28.6% 43.5% N.A. 0.0% Ecuador - Mataje* 71.4% 56.5% N.A. 100.0% Colombia - Mira* 51.8% 38.7% 85.5% 1.3% Ecuador - Mira* 48.2% 61.3% 14.5% 98.7% Russia - Mius* 70.4% 75.8% 0.0% 0.0% Ukraine - Mius* 29.6% 24.2% 100.0% 100.0% Liberia - Moa 13.1% 7.5% 0.0% N.A. Benin - Mono* 5.0% 14.4% 0.0% 2.3% Togo - Mono* 95.0% 85.6% 100.0% 97.7% Afghanistan - Murgab* 59.8% 66.3% 90.0% 18.0% Turkmenistan - Murgab* 40.2% 33.7% 10.0% 82.0% Syria - Nahr El Kebir* 86.4% 93.5% N.A. 100.0% Nicaragua - Negro* 89.3% 75.7% 40.6% 99.5% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-14 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Croatia - Neretva* 3.5% 3.1% 0.0% 2.5% Bulgaria - Nestos* 53.4% 61.6% 54.9% 31.8% Algeria - Niger** 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Nyanga* 6.6% 2.7% 0.0% N.A. Gabon - Nyanga* 93.4% 97.3% 100.0% N.A. Cameroon - Ogooue 2.4% 3.2% 1.0% 0.0% Congo, Republic of the (Brazzaville) - Ogooue 11.9% 13.8% 10.2% 0.0% Equatorial Guinea - Ogooue 0.9% 4.6% 1.8% 0.0% Gabon - Ogooue 84.9% 78.4% 87.0% 100.0% Brazil - Oiapoque/Oyupock 40.2% 74.6% 34.0% N.A. French Guiana - Oiapoque/Oyupock* 59.8% 25.4% 66.0% N.A. Kazakhstan - Oral/Ural 56.5% 30.3% 47.4% 94.8% Brazil - Orinoco 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Colombia - Orinoco 34.7% 16.6% 36.2% 42.5% Venezuela - Orinoco 65.2% 83.4% 63.8% 57.5% Togo - Oueme** 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% Finland - Oulu 93.2% 99.6% 93.1% 100.0% Russia - Oulu 6.8% 0.4% 6.9% 0.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Pakchan 51.1% 30.5% 47.7% 31.9% Thailand - Pakchan 48.9% 69.5% 52.3% 68.1% Argentina - Palena 45.0% 24.0% 9.3% N.A. Chile - Palena 55.0% 76.0% 90.7% N.A. Brunei - Pandaruan 58.0% 92.2% N.A. N.A. Malaysia - Pandaruan 42.0% 7.8% N.A. N.A. Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-15 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Kenya - Pangani* 2.6% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Tanzania, United Republic of - Pangani* 97.4% 97.9% 100.0% 100.0% Estonia - Parnu 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% N.A. Argentina - Pascua* 46.1% 36.0% 41.5% N.A. Chile - Pascua* 53.9% 64.0% 58.5% N.A. Colombia - Patia* 97.6% 90.9% 100.0% 78.9% Ecuador - Patia* 2.4% 9.1% 0.0% 21.1% Russia - Prohladnaja 77.1% 86.4% N.A. 100.0% Poland - Prohladnaja* 22.9% 13.6% N.A. 0.0% Russia - Pu Lun T'o* 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Chile - Puelo 34.2% 12.0% 26.7% 0.0% Argentina - Puelo* 65.8% 88.0% 73.3% 100.0% Laos, People's Democratic Republic of - Red/Song Hong 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Red/Song Hong* 53.7% 38.4% 42.7% 55.3% Vietnam - Red/Song Hong* 45.6% 61.6% 57.3% 44.7% Liechtenstein - Rhine 0.1% 0.1% 6.3% 0.0% Argentina - Rio Grande (South America)* 49.6% 85.1% 30.4% N.A. Chile - Rio Grande (South America)* 50.4% 14.9% 69.6% N.A. Mozambique - Sabi* 26.1% 7.6% 9.3% 0.0% Zimbabwe - Sabi* 73.9% 92.4% 90.7% 100.0% Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Saigon 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vietnam - Saigon 99.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-16 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Estonia - Salaca 5.5% 1.4% 0.0% N.A. China - Salween 52.4% 46.6% 45.7% 68.0% Myanmar (Burma) - Salween 43.8% 51.1% 46.5% 27.2% Thailand - Salween* 3.7% 2.3% 7.8% 4.8% Azerbaijan - Samur* 6.5% 2.5% 0.0% 14.2% Russia - Samur* 93.5% 97.5% 100.0% 85.8% Costa Rica - San Juan 30.1% 11.5% 46.0% 30.2% Nicaragua - San Juan* 69.9% 88.5% 54.0% 69.8% Argentina - San Martin* 12.2% 57.9% N.A. N.A. Chile - San Martin* 87.8% 42.1% N.A. N.A. Belize - Sarstun 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% N.A. Guatemala - Sarstun 93.4% 99.4% 100.0% N.A. Indonesia - Sembakung 52.9% 18.5% 83.5% 100.0% Malaysia - Sembakung 47.1% 81.5% 16.5% 0.0% Argentina - Seno Union/Serrano* 10.3% 1.1% 0.0% N.A. Chile - Seno Union/Serrano* 89.7% 98.9% 100.0% N.A. Cambodia (Kampuchea) - Song Vam Co Dong 49.2% 38.6% 36.5% 19.2% Vietnam - Song Vam Co Dong 50.8% 61.4% 63.5% 80.8% Guinea - St. John (Africa) 16.9% 21.1% 27.0% 0.0% Liberia - St. John (Africa) 83.0% 78.9% 73.0% 100.0% Liberia - St. Paul 55.5% 44.9% 63.7% 100.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-17 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Bulgaria - Struma* 58.2% 63.4% 81.3% 52.6% China - Sujfun* 64.7% 60.0% 64.3% 60.2% Russia - Sujfun* 35.3% 40.0% 35.7% 39.8% Azerbaijan - Sulak* 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Georgia - Sulak* 7.3% 0.2% 25.6% 0.0% Russia - Sulak* 92.4% 99.7% 74.4% 100.0% Indonesia - Tami 97.6% 97.8% 95.6% 100.0% Papua New Guinea - Tami 2.4% 2.2% 4.4% 0.0% Ghana - Tano* 89.1% 94.1% 68.5% 0.0% Ivory Coast - Tano* 10.9% 5.9% 31.5% 100.0% Afghanistan - Tarim* 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% China - Tarim* 97.2% 99.8% 58.4% 99.5% Kyrgyzstan - Tarim* 2.0% 0.1% 39.0% 0.5% Tajikistan - Tarim* 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Pakistan - Tarim** 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% Belize - Temash 85.0% 50.3% N.A. N.A. Guatemala - Temash 15.0% 49.7% N.A. N.A. Russia - Terek 95.3% 99.8% 100.0% 100.0% Georgia - Terek* 4.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Lesotho - Thukela* 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Saudi Arabia - Tigris- Euphrates/Shatt al Arab** 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Russia - Tuloma 92.1% 100.0% 84.3% N.A. Finland - Tuloma* 7.9% 0.0% 15.7% N.A. Tanzania, United Republic of - Umba* 83.1% 88.1% 12.0% 100.0% Kenya - Umba** 16.9% 11.9% 88.0% 0.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-18 High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability Relative importance Relative importance Relative importance Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Country-basin unit Popu- Run- Irrigated Area Area Area lation off area lation off area lation off area Lebanon - Wadi Al Izziyah* 67.8% 73.8% 0.0% 62.8% Denmark - Wiedau 85.0% 88.4% N.A. 100.0% Germany - Wiedau 15.0% 11.6% N.A. 0.0% China - Yalu* 52.9% 58.6% 50.7% 47.1% Korea, Democratic People's Republic of (North) - Yalu* 47.1% 41.4% 49.3% 52.9% Chile - Yelcho 37.8% 17.5% 58.0% 0.0% Argentina - Yelcho* 62.2% 82.5% 42.0% 100.0% Belgium - Yser* 47.5% 53.1% N.A. 0.0% France - Yser* 52.5% 46.9% N.A. 100.0% Appendix 11 - CBUs at risk in 2050 under Wettest climate scenario A11-19 Figure A11-1. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience high increases in runoff variability for 2050. A11-20 Figure A11-2. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience moderate increases in runoff variability for 2050. A11-21 Figure A11-3. The grouped treaty/RBO coverage for all CBUs predicted to experience little or no increase in runoff variability for 2050. A11-22