E4476 REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN Horticulture Development Project (HDP) Environmental Management Framework February 24, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ ii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... iv I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 II. POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................ 7 Uzbekistan National Environmental Legislation and Procedures.................................................. 7 The World Bank Safeguards Policy and Environmental Assessment Requirements .................... 11 The Comparison of National and World Bank Environment Assessment Requirements.............. 17 III. ASSESSMENT OF Potential ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................ 19 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES ....................................................... 26 V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR ACCESS TO CREDIT COMPONENT .............................................................................................................. 29 VI. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ................... 34 VII. PEST MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................ 37 ANNEX 1 Environmental Categories .......................................................................................... 69 ANNEX 2 Environmental Screening Checklist Forms (Access to Credit Component) .............. 71 ANNEX 3 Environmental Mitigationand Best Practice (Access to Credit Component) ............ 80 ANNEX 4 Accept/Reject Decision Making (Access to Credit Component) .............................. 85 ANNEX 5 Public Consultations for Mid-Size Credits (Access to Credit Component) .............. 87 ANNEX 6 Terms of Reference for Environmental Assessment .................................................. 88 ANNEX 7 Environmental Management Plan Checklist .............................................................. 90 ANNEX 8 Terms of Reference for RRA Environmental Specialist............................................ 95 ANNEX 9 EMF and PMP Budget ............................................................................................... 97 ANNEX 10 Summary of Stakeholder Meeting on the draft EMF................................................ 99 ANNEX 11 List of Pesticides registered in Uzbekistan ............................................................. 102 ANNEX 12 List of Forbidden and Limited Application Chemicals .......................................... 126 ANNEX 13 Summary of Project outcomes of RESP-II ............................................................. 128 - ii - ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CALCIM Central Asian Countries Intiative for Land Management CIS Commonwealth of Independent States EA Environmental Assessment EE Energy efficiency/efficient EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMF Environmental Management Framework EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Monitoring Specialist ER Environmental Review FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FMR Financial Management Report HDP Horticulture Development Project IPM Integrated Pest Management MAL Maximum Allowable Limit MAWR Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources MIS Management Information System MOM Management, Operation and Maintenance NGO Non-governmental Organization O&M Operation and Maintenance OP Operation Policy (of the World Bank) PFI Participating Financial Institution PHH Post-harvest Handling PIU Project Implementation Unit PMP Pest Management Plan PMF Pest Management Framework PSEA Project Specific Environmental Assessment RE Renewable energy RESP I Rural Enterprise Support Project Phase I RESP II Rural Enterprise Support Project Phase II RRA Rural Restructuring Agency RUz Republic of Uzbekistan SA Social Assessment SCC State Chemical Commission of RUz SEE State Environmental Expertise TOR Terms of Reference USD United States Dollar UZS Uzbekistan Sum WB World Bank WHO World Health Organization WUA Water Users’ Association - iii - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Project objective. The Horticulture Development Project (HDP) is aimed at assisting the Government of Uzbekistan to improve the productivity, profitability and competitiveness of the horticulture sector. The objectives of the project are to be achieved through (i) provision of agriculture support services to bridge the knowledge and experience gap related to new production, storage, post-harvest handling, and marketing knowledge and experience in the country; (ii) enhance access to financial services for agribusinesses operating in the horticulture sector, in particular towards enhanced competitiveness of the sector, improved quality and food safety standards, and establishment of market linkages; and (iii) strengthening the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (MAWR) and Rural Restructuring Agency (RRA) capacity for project management, monitoring and evaluation. 2. Project Location. The sub-projects to be supported by the Credit Line in seven provinces of the country based on demand for proposed activities. The seven provinces are Andijan, Jizzakh, Ferghana, Kashkadarya, Namangan, Samaraqand and Tashkent. 3. Project category. In accordance with the Bank’s safeguard policies and procedures, including OP/BP/GP 4.01 Environmental Assessment, the project is classified as Category B for which an Enviromental Assessment (EA) with Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is required. As before Appraisal it is not possible to identify which subproject will be financed the appropriate EA instrument is the Environmental Management Framework (EMF) which would specify all rules and procedures for the subprojects Environmental Assessment (EA). 4. Purpose of Environmental Management Framework.The purpose of the Environmental Management Framework was to provide the World Bank’s and Government of Uzbekistans’s national rules and procedures for project Environmental Impacts Assessment (EIA), identify the significant environmental impacts of the project (both positive and negative), to outline rules and procedure for the sub-projects environmental screening and to specify appropriate preventive actions and mitigation measures (including appropriate monitoring plan) to prevent, eliminate or minimize any anticipated adverse impacts on environment. The EMF report was prepared by the Rural Restructuring Agency (RRA) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (MAWR)based on the following: (i) analysis of the existing national legal documents, regulations and guidelines; (ii) World Bank safeguard policies, as well as other guiding materials; (iii) exisiting EMFs for similar World Bank projects, (iv) experience from implementation of EMF of the ongoing RESP II project; and (iv) results of consultations with the representatives of stakeholders and all interested parties. 5. EA Institutional capacities to perform environmental safeguards.The evaluation of the EA institutional capacity has shown that national institutions (RRA) and implementing entities although having basic capacities to perform their duties concerning EA and enforcing the EMF provisions, there is need for additional capacity building activities. In this regard the Project will support additional information dissemination and training activities to ensure the environmental requirements and the EMF provisions would be fully implemented. A special attention will be - iv - paid to training of Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs) and RRA which should play a major role in subprojects EA. 6. Potential environmental impacts. The project will support mostly various types of agricultural production and agro-processing subprojects. None of them will cause significant environmental impacts which may fall under the Category A projects and for which a full EIA would be required (it was decided none of category A subprojects will be supported under the proposed new credit line). However, the majority of sub-projects might cause adverse environmental impacts that would fall under the Category B projects in accordance with the Bank OP/BP 4.01 (small scale agro-industries; small scale rehabilitation, maintenance, and upgrading of various premises, storage facilities; plantation of new orchards and/or vineyards, etc), for which the Bank requires a simple and/or a partial Environmental Assessment and/or preparing an Environmental Management Plan. It is also expected that many of supported subprojects will not have environmental impacts and will fall under the Category C in accordance with OP/BP 4.01 (especially those related to purchasing of new agricultural machinery). Furthermore, it is expected the selected subprojects will not be located in protected areas, critical habitats or culturally or socially sensitive areas, - this will be ensured during the subprojects screening and EA. 7. The potential adverse environmental impacts of proposed types of subprojects might be summarized as follows: (a) agricultural production: soil erosion, loss of soil productive capacity, soil compaction, soil pollution, surface and underground water pollution, loss of biodiversity; (b) agro-processing: contribution to surface water pollution, wastes generation, odor; (c) small scale construction and/or rehabilitation of the existing premises: soil and air pollution; acoustic, construction wastes, and potential asbestos issues, etc. All these impacts are expected to be easily mitigated through good projects design and best implementation practices. 8. Potential social impacts. The sub-projects to be implemented under the Credit Line will generate a great number of both direct and indirect positive impacts. Direct positive impacts will be generated by increased production, products and goods which would result in creation of new jobs and respectively, more employment and increased income. Indirect positive impacts will relate to overall improving of business environment, introduction of advanced agricultural technologies and techniques, contribution to poverty reduction and food safety. Potential indirect adverse social impacts can be related to increase water pollution due to more usage of chemicals in agriculture. A separate social assessment is currently under preparation and aims to identify social issues to be addressed throughout the project implementation. The social assessment report will be disclosed upon completion. The project will also participate in the Third Party Monitoring (TPM) and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) set up by the World Bank for the agricultural portfolio in the country to focus on issues of child and forced adult labor. The TPM/ GRM will be funded by a separate TF. 9. Environment Management Framework (EMF). The document outlines environmental assessment procedures and mitigation requirements in line with both national and World Bank policies for the subprojects which will be supported by the project. It provides details on procedures, criteria and responsibilities for subprojects preparing, screening, appraisal, implementing and monitoring. The document also includes Environmental Guidelines for -v- different types of proposed subprojects providing analysis of potential impacts and generic mitigation measures to be undertaken for subprojects in agricultural production and agro- processing sectors at all stages - from identification and selection, through the design and implementation phase, to the monitoring and evaluation of results. Lastly, the EMF includes a Pest Management Plan that outlines the procedures for ensuring the safe handling, storage and use of pesticides and promotion of integrated pest management as an alternative option for the use of pesticides. 10. EMF disclosure and consultation. The RRA has disseminated the draft summary EMF to the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources and other relevant ministries for their review and comments. Also, the Executive Summary of the document in Russian was posted on websites of MAWR for its access to wide public on January 17th, 2014. On February 13, 2014, the RRA organized a consultation on Draft document. After the consultation, draft EMF was revised to consider inputs from consulted parties. The final EMF was posted on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture on February 14, 2014 and submitted to the World Bank Infoshop on March 10, 2014. - vi - I. INTRODUCTION 1. Project Background: The Horticulture Development Project (HDP) will focus on crops other than cotton, as well as analytical and advisory activities to develop a horticulture strategy. The Project Development Objective is to enhance the productivity, profitability and competitiveness of the horticulture sector in Uzbekistan. The project is financed by an IDA concessional Credit. The amount of the Credit is $150 million. The project would comprise the following three components: 2. Component 1 – Agricultural Support Services. The objective of the component is to bridge the knowledge and experience gap related to new production, storage, post-harvest handling (PHH), and marketing knowledge and experience in Uzbekistan. The component would support activities that would lead to improved farm economics, better quality of investment and marketing decisions, higher quality of produce, and subsequently would boost exports and rural employment. 3. Sub-component 1.1 - Strengthening research institutes – The project will strengthen research institutions through laboratory establishment and up-gradation, equipment, technical support and training to ensure assured improved planting materials, disease and pest identification and soils analyzing and creating optimal soil conditions, demonstration and dissemination of information on mechanical and biological on-farm technologies, including information about varieties, irrigation, greenhouses and post-harvest equipment. Based on these technologies modular training programs for farmers and traders for all areas, including storage, post-harvest handling, packing and marketing, and food hazard controls will be developed and disseminated to help farmers manage the business-side of farming, including basic information on record keeping, marketing, and business plans This component will also support opportunities for stakeholders and policy makers to learn from countries with advanced horticultural subsectors about successful policies through study tours that might also include leading farmers. 4. Sub-component 1.2 - Strengthen the public-private institutions that facilitate agricultural input and output markets – The project will support the building of capacity of voluntary associations along the value chain with the goal of drawing up quality standards, codes of conduct, and organizing marketing campaigns, drawing on the successful experiences of other countries; improving market information, including price information gathering and reporting about domestic and regional destination markets; undertaking market studies of potentially interesting fruit and vegetable markets to help farmers improve profitability; undertake market- channel studies identifying bottlenecks and opportunities for new private sector investments (e.g. collection points for processors, new packaging, new crops; provide technical support in marketing, including packaging, volume, quality and food safety requirements along various marketing channels; participation in national and international trade fairs to promote investments and exports and improve quality of production, marketing and investment decisions and opportunities for policy makers to learn about advanced horticulture policies and practice in other countries. 5. Sub-component 1.3 - Upgrade industry standards – the component will help protect local consumers from unsafe products and improve their access to higher quality products by assisting in development of good production and handling practices and other internationally food safety systems; translate various international fruit and vegetable quality requirements into Uzbek -1- language; develop manuals of quality and packaging requirements for various products in countries where Uzbek products are exported; and work with private-public voluntary associations to gather and disseminate information about private-public standards in domestic and destination markets. 6. Component 2 – Access to Credit.The objective of the Access to Credit component is to enhance access to financial services for agribusinesses operating in Uzbekistan’s horticulture sector, in particular towards enhanced competitiveness of the sector, improved quality and food safety standards, and establishment of market linkages. The component would finance such investments as new cultivars, seeds/seedlings, water-saving irrigation facilities rebahilitation (such as conversion to drip irrigation systems), alternative technologies for fertilizer application,agrochemicals, cold storage and other cold chain facilities, and value added handling/processing equipment and facilities. The component will build on the experience gained during RESP II which has achieved sizeable results with provision of financial services to Uzbekistan’s agricultural enterprises. The component would further expand access to investment financing through additional lending resources for use by banks and leasing companies for on- lending to agribusiness. The project would also support introduction of new financial products to support development of productive linkages in the sector. 7. Sub-component 2.1: Line of Credit for Banks and Leasing Companies (tentatively US$120 million). This sub-component will finance investment and working capital loans for enterprises operating in the horticultural sector. The current needs of agribusinesses for financing far exceed the long-term funds available to commercial banks, as shown by the high demand for investment funds under RESP II. Particularly, attention will be focused on investments supporting the enhanced competitiveness of the sector, access to new technologies, value addition in the sector, and improved market access through establishment of market linkages. In addition, the project would introduce a range of innovative structured finance products, to support development of market linkages and value chains. These products are expected to take the focus of the financial sector off the traditional forms of collateral, help agribusinesses borrow to deliver under signed contracts, and develop relationships between farmers, agro-processors, wholesalers, retailers, etc. 8. Sub-component 2.2: Technical Assistance to PFIs (tentatively US$0.6 million). Given the novelty of the non-traditional financial products to support value chain development, the project will implement a capacity building program for the financial institutions involved in the project. The training program will build on the Investment Lending and Leasing in Agriculture training carried out under the RESP II. The training program will cover: (i) value chain financing products; and (ii) tree-crop financing methodologies. The PFIs will receive training on applicability of the new financial products in lending to horticulture-related activities, assessing the suitability and effectiveness of these new financial products, and on mitigation of the related risks. The training will be about 5 days long, and will be targeting loan officers and branch managers of PFIs. An international bank training company will be hired under the project, to do the initial training, as well as transfer this specific knowledge to a local bank training company, which will take over the training activities at the later stages of the project. For the PFIs trying to test value chain financing products, a longer-term (resident) TA will be provided, to ensure the PFIs can appropriately structure the deal and manage the risks. In addition, all PFIs will have to undergo Environmental Training. -2- 9. Component 3 – Project Management. The component will be focused on strengthening the MAWR’s and RRA’s capacity for project management, monitoring and evaluation through the provision of goods, consultant services, training and financing of incremental operating costs. This component will (i) support operation of RRA, and finance overall project management, as well as contract administration, procurement, and financial management; and (iii) establish a robust performance based Management Information System (MIS) and arrange for data collection and reporting on key performance output and impact indicators, through baseline surveys, participatory assessments, mid-term review and final evaluation. 10. Project Location: The HDP Access to Credit component will concentrate on a seven provinces: Project Provinces Geographical Information Andijan Andijan Province is a large agrarian-industrial region of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The province consists of 14 administrative districts. Total area of the Province is 4.3 thousand sq. km.The climate of the region is a typically continental climate with extreme differences between summer and winter temperatures. Due to the fact that mountain chains are preventing cold air masses from entering the region, the winter weather is comparatively moderate. The vegetation period is 217 days, average annual precipitation is 200-250 mm.As with other regions of Uzbekistan, it is famous for its very sweet melons and watermelons, but cultivation of crops can be accomplished exclusively on irrigated lands. Main agriculture includes cotton, cereal, viticulture, cattle raising and vegetable gardening.Industry includes metal processing, chemical industry, light industry, food processing. Jizzakh Jizzakh (Djizak) province is located in the central part of the Republic of Uzbekistan, between the rivers Syrdarya and Zarafshan, in the south-east with the Republic of Tajikistan. The province consists of 12 administrative districts. The province's territory is 21.2 thousand sq. km.The territory of the province is characterized by a variety of natural landscapes, unique exotic elements of relief and climate. This peculiarity is firstly due to the mountain necklace of Turkestan range, at the foot of which lie more than 3 thousand square kilometers of virgin land.According to its natural and climatic conditions the province belongs to the zone of extreme continental climate, featuring hot and dry summers, relatively mild winter. The average annual precipitation is 400-500 mm of rainfall, and vegetation period lasts 240-260 days. Ferghana Fergana province is located in a southern part of Fergana valley. The province consists of 15 administrative districts. The total territory of province is 6.8 thousand sq. km. 79% of the province area are plains, the other 21% are mountains and foothill regions.The climate is continental with mild winters and hot summers. The vegetation period is 210-220 days, average annual precipitation in east part of province is 170 mm. In the foothills annual precipitation reaches 270 mm. Kashkadarya Kashkadarya province is located in the Southern part of Uzbekistan, in the basin of the Kashkadarya river on the western mountainside Pamir-Alai. The province consists of 13 administrative districts. Total area of the province amounts to 28.6 thousand sq. km.The climate is continental, dry, somewhere is subtropical, favorable for land cultivation and cattle breeding. The average annual temperature is + 15°C. The average annual precipitation is 187-285 mm, in mountainous and submountain areas – 500 mm. Namangan Namangan province is located in northeast part of Fergana valley. The province consists of 11 administrative districts. The total territory of province is 7.44 thousand sq. km. The climate in province is continental, characterized by hot dry summer and moderate damp winter. In summer the temperature rises sharply, it becomes dry and hot, in mountains and foothills as usual cool and damp. The climatic conditions of eastern and western parts of the province vary considerably. Surrounded by mountain ranges, the eastern part has mild climate, rainfall of 600 mm, which creates favorable conditions for development of rainfed agriculture. In the western part rainfall is much less, there are few rivers, and hilly and mountainous land with sparse vegetation is -3- unsuitable for agriculture. Samarqand Samarqand province is located in central part of Republic of Uzbekistan. The Province is divided into 14 administrative districts. The total territory of the province is 16.8 thousand sq. km. The climate is a typically arid continental climate. Winter on the plains is mild and summer temperatures are between 32-38°C. The average annual precipitation in the west is 100-200 mm, in the mountains more than 800 mm. Tashkent Tashkent province is located in the northeast of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Toshkent Province is divided into 15 administrative districts. The total territory of province is 15.3 thousand sq. km.There are three large water reservoirs located in the province: Charvak, Tashkent, and Ahangaran. Main rivers are – Syrdarya (its length is equal to 125 km in the Tashkent province) and its inflows: Chirchik (together with Pskem) and Angren.The climate of Tashkent province is sharply continental, characteristic features are dryness, an abundance of heat, light. Annual precipitation is about 300 mm per year. The vegetation period on plain consist of 210 days in a year. 11. Environmental Management Framework: The purpose of the Environmental Management Framework (EMF) for the HDP is to ensure that the project proposed for World Bank financing is environmentally sound and sustainable and that the project interventions are in compliance with the requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan and that of the World Bank. 12. Project Environment Category: HDP has been rated in the environmental screening category "B" and has been subject to an environmental review by the preparation team. The Project involves investment in Agriculture support services and Rural Finance in a set of provinces of Uzbekistan. It is a requirement of the Bank and Uzbekistan legislation that for a B category project, all project components should be verified that they are in compliance with the Uzbekistan environmental laws and regulations and are consistent with World Bank policy (OP 4.01) and procedures on environmental assessment. As in the case of economic, financial, institutional and engineering analysis, Environmental Assessment is a part of project preparation. The EMF provides a frameworkfor identifying and addressing environmental impacts of activities financed under the HDP. It also provides means for screening and mitigating potential environmental impacts of the credit line investments. 13. Project Environmental Aspects: The project will benefit from the institutional capacity developed under the World Bank Rural Enterprise Support Project (RESP) Phase I and the ongoing RESP Phase II project which stressed awareness of safeguard policies. The project’s information and advisory service activities will continue to promote the adoption of improved and environmentally sound technologies, and provide training and advice on management of environmental impacts and mitigation measures. A large number of trainings were provided during RESP I and II to all project beneficiaries including borrowers from the line of credit under Rural Finance. It is planned to continue this practice under HDP. 14. The Rural Finance activities related to Participating Financial Institutions (PFIs) will deal with medium-to-small loans which are expected to be used for agricultural inputs and implements, storage and cooling facilities, equipment and trading activities with some environmental impact. Members of PFIs involved in lending will also be provided with training on the potential environmental impact of sub-projects, pest management and on mitigation measures. The most common end-uses of loans under RESP-I and II have been for provision of farming services such as farm mechanization, storage and distribution facilities, financing of agricultural inputs (including pesticides) and investments in tree-crops. These activities are -4- closely linked to Rural Advisory Service activities and borrowers will therefore receive some guidance on their usage. 15. The participating financial institutions (PFIs) for HDP are the commercial banks and leasing companies for the mid-size credit line and leasing services. 16. General Agriculture related Environmental Issues: Uzbekistan has a number of environmental issues that should be addressed and many of these are either directly or indirectly related to agriculture and as such are relevant to this Project. A number of environmental problems are as a result of past and current agricultural activities and as such the Project must take care to not exacerbate the situation, but also topromote activities that will be environmentally enhancing, to overcome some of these past mistakes. 17. Over 60% of the irrigated area of 4 million hectares in the country is classed as salt affected, while some 30% is classed as having moderately or highly saline land. Soil salinization is worsening because main drainage systems are poorly maintained and an increasing percentage of the on-farm drainage systems is out of operation and difficult to rehabilitate. The rapid increase in river salinization which was observed before 1990 has come to a halt because drainage systems are becoming increasingly less effective in removing salts from the irrigated areas. 18. Agricultural and rural enterprises can also indirectly result in negative environmental effects. The issues are listed below, with causes, in no particular order of importance: • Groundwater pollution – chemicals including agricultural • Surface water pollution – chemicals including agricultural • Water losses – irrigation systems • Soil salinization and alkalination – irrigation systems • Water logging – irrigation systems (drainage) • Biodiversity losses (including pressure on relatives of domestic crops, fruit trees and medicinal plants) – grazing and deforestation • Soil erosion – overgrazing and irrigation systems • Soil fertility losses – cultivation practices • Land contamination – chemicals including agricultural, industrial wastes • Environmental health and hazards – food contamination and exposure to pollutants 19. In addition to these issues there are others related to agro-processing and other agribusiness enterprises, major concerns relate to effluent discharges and their impact on water quality, water use, disturbance of biodiversity, and general health and safety issues. A specific concern is the introduction of alien species and their effect on biodiversity, especially endemic species. 20. Environmental and safeguard issues are foreseen mainly with respect to investment in small and medium agro-processing enterprises likely to be financed under the project through credit lines from PFIs. Agro-processors would have potential environmental impacts from solid and liquid waste emissions, smoke, airborne particles and gaseous discharges, transport and machinery noise. These would need to be mitigated to National Standards and EMF guidelines by incorporating the necessary controls and treatment systems in the design and, during procurement, by specifying equipment and processes that meet these standards. Processors -5- would also need to incorporate National safety measures for personnel in the vicinity of operating machinery. Monitoring to ensure that these measures are being implemented successfully would be necessary. 21. Responsibility for Environmental Management: During the implementation of some project activities it is anticipated that there would be some impacts to the soil, water, flora and fauna, earth structure and social environment through discharge of solid and liquid type wastes to environment, emissions of harmful gases to atmosphere and other effects. These impacts should be mitigated on the basis of existing standards of Uzbekistan as described in the EMF. This process besides common requirements also includes additional ecological requirements to sub- projects to be formulated before funding of projects and envisages on the basis of relevant standards, control of purchase of some equipment, application of technologies and process of fulfillment of the project. 22. The project implementing agency will require that every loan application submitted under the Access to Credit Component include acompleted Environmental Screening Checklist related to the program proposed. Guidelines for such assessments will be in conformity with Bank requirements, as described in Chapter 5 and 6 and Annex 2 of this EMF. Based on the review of the screening checklist and assessment made by the PFI loan officer (in consultation with the RRA Environmental Specialist, as necessary), the final package containing the list of requirements for loan applications would include specific requirements for management of environmental aspects of the sub-project. Based on the assessment, the environmental requirements would be one of the following: (a) simple Environmental Management Plan and/or EMP Checklists (for small scale construction and reconstruction projects); (b) simple EA and EMP for Category B projects; and (c) regular EA and EMP, - for more complex projects. 23. Sub-projects financed through project credit lines must be in compliance with the environmental laws and regulations of Uzbekistan and with World Bank safeguard policies. Buildings, equipment and processes; production, storage and marketing technologies; production and processing materials; construction sites and factories, and working environments must all comply with the relevant environmental laws. Environmental risk management of sub-loans will be a part of sub-loan appraisal by the project’s participating financial institutions. Loan officers should verify that sub-loan and micro-loan applications are in compliance with Uzbekistan laws and regulations and will not cause enduring harm to the Uzbekistan natural environment. The RRA environmental specialist will be able to provide guidance in case of complex projects. 24. The EMF environmental guidelines require financial intermediaries to undertake environmental screening of the sub-project: a) To screen for potential environmental problems against a checklist, and to categorize and quantify the risk against pre-determined charts. b) To call for an environmental impact assessment for any proposal that indicates more than minimal levels of risk. c) To screen credit applications for potential impacts on physical cultural resources. 25. The PFI loan officer will make decisions on environmental and safeguard compliance, providing that there are no significant environmental issues involved in the proposal. In the case of significant environmental issues that are beyond the experience of the loan officer, the PFI will request assistance from the RRA FIs on the screening category and scope of the -6- environmental mitigation plan for the application to the PFI. In any case of doubt, the PFI should consult with the RRA. II. POLICY CONTEXT Uzbekistan National Environmental Legislation and Procedures 26. National Environmental Policies: The main priority for the Republic of Uzbekistan during the on-going economic reforms is to ensure reliable social guarantees and measures for social security and environmental protection1. Nature protection policy and the implementing measures in the areas of rational use of the natural resources and environment protection are based on the following main principles:  Integration of economic and ecological policy aimed at conservation and restoration of the environment as the essential condition for improvement of the living standards of the population;  Transition from protection of individual natural elements to the general and integrated protection of ecosystems;  Responsibility of all members of society for environment protection and conservation of biodiversity. 27. Environmental Legislation and Policy: Since independence Uzbekistan has established more than 100 laws, revisions of old legislation and resource management policies designed to address environmental problems and manage environmental resources. Relevant environmental laws and regulations in the framework of the present Project include:  “On Environmental Protectionâ€? (1992), establishing a legal, economic and organizational framework for environment protection, ensuring sustainable development and defining principles including State Ecological Expertise (SEE);  “On Water and Water Useâ€? (1993), ensuring rational water use, protection of water resources, prevention and mitigation of negative impacts and compliance with national legislation;  “On Plant Quarantineâ€? (1995) regulates activities concerning outside and inside quarantine of plants, aimed at protecting the territory of the Republic from the penetration of quarantine and other dangerous pests, plant diseases and weeds from foreign countries, which can cause significant economic damage to the national economy;  “On Land Codeâ€? (1998) provides basic norms and rules for land use and stipulates the land rights;  “On the Concept of National Securityâ€? (1997), a principle framework for achieving national ecological security, etc.;  “On the Protection and Use of Flora (plants)â€? (1997) regulates relations in the field of protection and use of flora (plants) growing in natural conditions, as well as wild plants kept under crop conditions for their reproduction and genetic conservation;  “On the Protection of Agricultural Plants from Pests, Diseases and Weedsâ€? (2000) regulates activities on the protection of agricultural plants from pests, diseases and weeds, and the 1 Karimov Islam. 1999. “Uzbekistan: Towards 21-st Centuryâ€?, Report on the 14-th Session of Parliament (Oliy Majlis). -7- prevention of the harmful influence of plant protective substances on human health and on the natural environment;  “On Ecological Expertiseâ€? (2001) provides for mandatory expert assessment of impacts on the environment and human health, as well as a legal basis for conducting expert assessments;  “On Ecological controlâ€? (2013) regulates relations in the field of environmental control. The main objectives of environmental control are prevention, detection and suppression of violations of environmental regulations; monitoring of environmental situations that may lead to environmental pollution, unsustainable use of natural resources, endangering the life and health of citizens. 28. Legislation Related to Water Resources, Nature Protection and Pest Management. Many important aspects of state management, use and protection of water resources, nature and agricultural plants are regulated by Decrees of the Cabinet of Ministers, such as:  “On regulation of ecologically dangerous product and waste shipments to and from the territory of the Republic of Uzbekistanâ€? (No 151, 19.04.2001);  “On approval of the Regulation of the State Environmental Expertiseâ€? (No 491, 31.12.2001);  “On approval of the Provision for procedures for the cadastral division of territory of the RUz and formation of cadastral numbers for land plots, buildings and structuresâ€? (No 492, 31.12.2001);  “On approval of Provision on the State Environment Monitoringâ€? (No 49, 3.04.2002);  “On rendering status of the specially protected natural territories of the republican importance to the fresh water aquifer formation zonesâ€? (No 302, 26.08.2002);  “On improvement of the Hydro-Meteorological Serviceâ€? (No 183, 14.04.2004);  “On the Issues of the Activity of the State Commission on Chemicals and Plant Protection (GOSKHIMKOMISSIYA)â€? (No 1, 04.01.2005);  “On Measures to Improve the Control System for Delivery and Effective Use of Chemicals for the Protection of Plantsâ€? (No 31, 24.02.2006);  “On approval of the Program of the state environmental monitoring in the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2011-2015â€? (No 292, 31.10.2011);  “On the Action Program for the Protection of Environment in the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2013-2017â€? (No 142, 27.05.2013);  “On approval of the Regulations for issuing permits for special use or consumption of waterâ€? (No 171, 14.06.2013) 29. Nature Protection Normative Documents. Relevant nature protection normative documents issued by government include:  “Procedure for elaboration and execution of draft standards on maximum permissible emission of contaminants discharged to water bodies including drainage waterâ€? (RD 118.0027719.5-91);  “Procedure for granting permission for special water useâ€? (RD 118.0027714.6-92);  “Instruction for determining of damage caused to the national economy by underground water contaminationâ€? (RD 118.0027714.47-95); -8-  “Temporary recommendation on control of underground water protection of the Republic of Uzbekistanâ€?. State Nature Committee and Uzbekgidrogeologiya of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, 1991;  “Procedure for elaboration and principal requirements of recommendations to use waste water for crop irrigationâ€? (RD 118.0027714.41-94);  “Regulation on the disposal procedure of pesticides and other toxic substances, as well as the protection and maintenance of special polygonsâ€? (registered by the Ministry of Justice, #2438 dated 20.03.2013). 30. International Cooperation and Global and Regional Agreements: In the context of the global environment, the Republic of Uzbekistan is a Party to three Rio Conventions: the Convention on Climate Change, Convention on Biological Diversity, and Convention to Combat Desertification, together with a number of other international Conventions, Protocols, Agreements, and Memoranda of Understanding in the areas of environmental conservation and sustainable development. Other global agreements to which Uzbekistan is party include:  Convention on Prohibition of Military or Any Aggressive Destructive Actions to the Environment (26.05.1993);  Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (22.12.1995);  Convention on Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (22.12.1995);  Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (01.07.1997);  Bonn Convention on Conservation of Migrating Species of Wild Animals (01.05.1998);  Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (30.08.2001). 31. State Organizations Responsible for Environmental Assessment and Management: The State Committee for Nature Protection (Goskompriroda) 2 is the primary environmental regulatory agency. It reports directly to the Oliy Majlis (Parliament), and is responsible, at central, oblast and raion levels, for coordinating the environmental and natural resources actions of other national government bodies. The mandate of Goskompriroda is based on the Regulation “On the State Environmental Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistanâ€? as approved by Parliament on 26 April 1996. 32. Goskompriroda is responsible for environmental and natural systems protection. It oversees the national system of protected areas, can initiate liability/damage actions, and administers an Environmental Fund which receives pollution fees and penalties and supports pollution mitigation measures. There are also several scientific institutes attached to the Goskompriroda which conduct analysis on environmental and natural resources problems and measures to address these in support of Goskompriroda’s work. 33. Goskompriroda also issues permits for pollution discharge emissions and may prohibit projects and construction works that do not comply with (international) legislation. Fees are collected at the regional level for the use of resources, for licences to discharge polluting material, and for waste disposal. 2 In English translations also called ‘State Committee for Nature Conservation’, ‘State Committee for Natural Resources’, ‘Committee of Nature Control’, etc. -9- 34. The structure of Goskompriroda takes the form of a central body in Tashkent, with regional (oblast) and local (raion) branches and agencies for scientific and technical support. Regional level organisations have the same structure as those at national level. Different departments take responsibility for environmental standards, environmental law, international relations, environmental funding, economics, publicity, and governmental ecological review. 35. EIA Procedures:State Environmental Expertise (SEE), i.e. preparation of or the review and approval (or rejection) of developments on environmental grounds, is regulated Law on Ecological Expertise (2000) andby Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers No 491.31.12.2001: “On approval of the Regulation of the State Environmental Expertiseâ€?. According to the article 3 of the abovementioned law Ecological expertise is carried out in order to determine: - compliance of projected economic and other activities with environmental requirements in the stages preceding decision making on its implementation; - level of ecological danger planned or carried out business and other activities, which may have or had a negative impact on the condition of the environment and public health; - adequacy and reasonableness of the measures provided for the protection of the environment and rational use of natural resources. The main responsible organization for state environmental review is the Main Directorate for State Ecological Expertise (Glavgosecoexpertiza) of Goskompriroda. The Regulation stipulates 4 categories for development:  Category I –Corresponds to World Bank category A;  Category II –Corresponds to World Bank category B;  Category III –Corresponds to World Bank category Bor C;  Category IV - Corresponds to World Bank category C. 36.According to the paragraph 11 of the Regulation, evaluation stages of the environmental impact should include the following basic issues (depending on the type and nature of work ): a) Draft statement on environmental impacts (DSEI):  environmental conditions prior to the implementation of the planned activities, population of the territory, land development, analysis of the environment’s features;  situational plan showing existing recreational areas, settlements, irrigation, reclamation facilities, farmland, power lines, transport communications, water, gas pipelines and other information about the area;  envisaged major and minor objects, used technique, technology, natural resources, materials, raw materials, fuel, analysis of their impacts on the environment, environmental hazards of their products;  expected emissions, discharges, wastes, their negative impact on the environment and ways of neutralization;  warehousing, storage and disposal of wastes;  analysis of the alternatives of the proposed or existing activity and technological solutions from the perspective of environmental protection, taking into account the achievements of science, technology and best practices; - 10 -  organizational, technical, technological solutions and activities, excluding the negative environmental impacts and mitigating the impact of the expertising object on the environment;  analysis of emergency situations (with an estimate of probability and scenario of the prevention of their negative impacts);  forecast environmental changes and environmental impacts as a result of the implementation of the expertising object; b) Statement on environmental impact (SEI):  assessment of environmental problems of the chosen site on the results of engineering- geological invesigations, modeling and other necessary researches;  environmental analysis of technology applied to the issues identified on the site;  the results of the public hearings (if necessary);  reasoned investigations of the nature-conservative measures to prevent the negative consequences of the expertising object; c) Statement on Environmental Consequences (SEC):  correction of the design decisions and other taken measures on the consideration of the DSEI by the bodies of Goskompriroda, as well as on the proposals made at the public hearings;  environmental regulations governing the activities of the expertising object;  requirements for the organization of work and the implementation of measures for environmental guiding of the operation of the object;  main conclusions about the possibility of business activities. 37. Public Involvement: The Sub-borrower is also responsible for conducting at least one public consultation(s) for category I and II. These responsibilities include: (a) public notification, (b) conducting the consultation and (c) recording the significant findings, conclusions, recommendations and next steps. The purpose of public consultation(s) is (are) to solicit views of groups or individuals who may be affected by the Sub-project regarding their environmental concerns. Affected groups or people should identify the environmental issues they believe to be significant. Any significant issues, established during the public consultation, should be incorporated into the EMP. Public disclosure provides affected groups or individuals the opportunity to examine the draft EMP document before it is finalized so that they can review and provide comments on the mitigating measures agreed upon and the responsibilities for implementing them. Since Uzbek and World Bank consultation and disclosure requirements may differ somewhat, World Bank requirements presented below are the primary ones and have to be followed. The World Bank Safeguards Policy and Environmental Assessment Requirements 38. Overview. The Bank undertakes environmental screening of each proposed project for which it will provide funding in order to determine the appropriate extent and type of environmental assessments (EA). The Bank classifies a proposed project into one of four categories, depending on the type, location, sensitivity and scale of the project and the nature and magnitude of its potential environmental impacts. The four EA Categories are A, B, C, and FI. Category FI is applied to all proposed projects that involve investment of Bank funds through a participating financial intermediary (PFI) to be used for sub-projects of which the environmental impacts cannot be determined during appraisal of the World Bank project. - 11 - 39. World Bank’s Safeguard Policies and their relevance to project. There are key 10 Environmental and Social World Bank Safeguard Policies which are intended to ensure that potentially adverse environmental and social consequences of projects financed by Bank are identified, minimized and mitigated. World Bank Safeguard Policies have a three-part format: Operational Policies (OP) - statement of policy objectives and operational principles including the roles and obligations of the Borrower and the Bank, Bank Procedures (BP) - mandatory procedures to be followed by the Borrower and the Bank, and Good Practice (GP) - non- mandatory advisory material.World Bank’s Safeguard Policies and their relevance to sub- projects to be funded under the Competiveness Enhancement Project’s New Credit Line Component are indicated in the Table 1 below. Table 1. World Bank’s Safeguard Policies and their relevance to sub-project Safeguard Policies Relevance Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) Yes. This Policy aims to ensure that projects proposed for Bank financing are environmentally and socially sound and sustainable; to inform decision makers of the nature of environmental and social risks; To increase transparency and participation of stakeholders in thedecision-making process Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) No. The EMF provides screening criteria to be This Policy aims to safeguard natural habitats and their applied to exclude any projects that could impact on biodiversity; avoid significant conversion or degradation of natural habitats. critical natural habitats, and to ensure sustainability of services andproducts which natural habitats provide to human society Forestry (OP/BP 4.36) No. The EMF provides screening criteria for This Policy is to ensure that forests are managed in a exclusion of any projects that could impact on sustainable manner; significant areas of forest are forests, rights of forest communities or traditional notencroached upon; the rights of communities to use their uses of forests. traditional forest areas in a sustainable manner are not compromised Pest Management (OP 4.09). This policy is to ensure pest Yes (as in the case of agricultural production or management activities follow an Integrated Pest agro-processing sub-projects there might be needed Management (IPM) approach, to minimize environmental pest management activities). The EMF has a special and health hazardsdue to pesticide use, and to contribute to section specifying provisions for preparation of developing national capacity to implement IPM, and to simple pest/pesticide management plans as part of regulate and monitor the distribution and use of pesticides the application process) and supporting IPM. Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) No. The EMF provides screening criteria for This policy is to ensure that: Physical Cultural Resources exclusion of any projects that could impact on (PCR) are identified and protected in World Bank financed physical cultural resources. projects; national laws governing the protection of physical cultural property are complied with; PCR includes archaeological and historical sites, historic urban areas, sacred sites, graveyards, burial sites, unique natural values; implemented as an element of the Environmental Assessment Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10) No (this Policy is not applicable in Uzbekistan). IP – distinct, vulnerable, social and cultural group attached to geographically distinct habitats or historical territories, with separate culture than the project area, and usually different language. The Policy aims to foster full respect for human rights, economies, and cultures of IP, and to avoid - 12 - adverse effects on IP during the project development. Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) No. (the project will support construction of new This policy aims to minimize displacement; treat buildings and processing and cold storage facilities resettlement as a development program; provide affected only in the case when land acquisition is not people with opportunities for participation; assist displaced necessary and when people have not been displaced persons in their efforts to improve their incomes and prior to the application for purposes of the proposed standards of living, or at least to restore them; assist subproject and there are no resettlement issues. For displaced people regardless of legality of tenure; pay such cases the investor should have the compensation for affected assets at replacement cost; the landownership title as well as has to prove the land OP Annexes include descriptions of ResettlementPlans and at the moment of subprojects application is not Resettlement Policy Frameworks occupied or used even illegally). Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) No ( However, if any activity is dependent on an This Policy is to ensure due consideration is given to the existing dam (e.g. irrigation works), then the safety of dams in projects involving construction of new PFI/RRA would verify that the particular dam dams, or that may be affected by the safety or performance meets the safety requirements of the World Bank of an existing dam or dams under construction; important OP 4.37 considerations are dam height & reservoir capacity Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP7.50) No. Any credit investments would be limited to The Policy aims to ensure that projects will neither affect rehabilitation or modification of existing minor the efficient utilization and protection of international schemes in ways which would not increase the waterways, nor adversely affect relations between the Bank amount of water abstracted or have any other and its Borrowers and between riparian states impact on the water source or local hydrological regime (e.g. replacing conventional irrigation with drip irrigation in an existing irrigation scheme would be still eligible. Creating a new scheme which will lead to increasing water abstraction from the rivers will not be financed under the project. This determination would be made in the screening process. Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60) No. (the project will not support any activities in The Bank may support a project in adisputed area if disputed areas) governments concernedagree that, pending the settlement of thedispute, the project proposed for one country should go foreword withoutprejudice to the claims of the other country Disclosure Policy (BP 17.50) supports decision making by Yes. (the EMF will be disclosed and consulted in the borrower and Bank by allowing the public access to the country before appraisal and will be also information on environmental and social aspects of projects disclosed in the WB Infoshop) and has specific requirements for disclosure 40. World Bank Screening Categories and Environmental Assessment Procedures. Environmental Screening is a Mandatory Procedure for the Environmental Assessment 4.01 OP/BP. The Bank undertakes environmental screening of each proposed project for which it will provide funding in order to determine the appropriate extent and type of the Environmental Assessment to be conducted. The Bank classifies a proposed project into one of four categories, depending on the type, location, sensitivity and scale of the project and the nature and magnitude of its potential environmental impacts3. These four Categories are A, B, C, and FI. 3 See: Environmental Assessment Update Sourcebook, Environmental Department April 1993. The World Bank - 13 - 41. Category A projects are likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are sensitive, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may be sensitive, irreversible, and diverse, with attributes such direct pollutant discharges large enough to cause degradation of air, water, or soil; large-scale physical disturbances of the site and/or surroundings; extraction, consumption, or conversion of substantial amounts of forest and other natural resources; measurable modifications of hydrological cycles; hazardous materials in more than incidental quantities; and involuntary displacement of people and other significant social disturbances. The impacts are likely to be comprehensive, broad, sector-wide, or precedent-setting. Impacts generally result from a major component of the project and affect the area as a whole or an entire sector. They may affect an area broader than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. The EA for a Category A project examines the project's potential negative and positive environmental impacts, compares them with those of feasible alternatives (including the "without project" scenario), and recommends any measures needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental performance. For a Category A project, the borrower is responsible for preparing a report, normally a full Environmental Impact Assessment (or a suitably comprehensive regional or sectoral EA). 42. Category B projects has potential adverse environmental impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas - including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other natural habitats - which are less adverse than those of Category A projects. These impacts are site- specific; few if any of them are irreversible; and in most cases mitigation measures can be designed more readily than for Category A projects. The scope of EA for a Category B project may vary from project to project, but it is narrower than that of Category A assessment. Like Category A, a Category B environmental assessment examines the project's potential negative and positive environmental impacts and recommends any measures needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental performance. 43.Category C. An EIA or environmental analysis is normally not required for Category C projects because the project is unlikely to have adverse impacts; normally, they have negligible or minimal direct disturbances on the physical setting. Professional judgment finds the project to have negligible, insignificant, or minimal environmental impacts. Beyond screening, no further EA action is required. 44.Category FI. A Category FI project involves investment of Bank funds through a financial intermediary, in subprojects that may result in adverse environmental impacts. 45. The Bank reviews the findings and recommendations of the EA to determine whether they provide an adequate basis for processing the project for Bank financing. When the borrower has completed or partially completed EA work prior to the Bank's involvement in a project, the Bank reviews the EA to ensure its consistency with this policy. The Bank may, if appropriate, require additional EA work, including public consultation and disclosure. 46. General examples of projects that fall under Categories A, B, and C are provided in the Table 2 below. However, this list is just a good starting point and framework for the screening decision. Because of other factors involved such as project sitting, the nature of impacts, and the need for the EA process to be flexible enough to accommodate them, the lists should not be used as the sole basis for screening. - 14 - Table 2. Types of projects under the World Bank’s Categories A, B, and C Category A Projects Category B Category C Projects (projects/project components Projects(projects/project (projects which are unlikely to have which may have diverse and components which may have diverse direct adverse impacts – no EIA is significant impacts – normally and significant impacts – more required) require a full EIA) limited environmental assessment is appropriate) ï‚· Dams and reservoirs; ï‚· Agro-industries (small scale); ï‚· Family planning; ï‚· Forestry production projects; ï‚· Electrical; transmission; ï‚· Nutrition; ï‚· Irrigation, drainage and flood ï‚· Irrigation and drainage (small scale);ï‚· Institutional development; control (large scale); ï‚· Renewable energy; ï‚· Technical assistance; ï‚· ï‚· Industrial plants (large scale*) and Rural electrification; ï‚· Most human resource projects industrial estates, including majorï‚· Tourism; Rural water supply and expansion, rehabilitation, or sanitation; modification; ï‚· Watershed projects (management or ï‚· Aquaculture and mariculture (large rehabilitation); scale); ï‚· Rehabilitation, maintenance, and ï‚· Land clearance and leveling; upgrading projects (small-scale); ï‚· Mineral development ï‚· Protected areas and biodiversity ï‚· Port and harbor development; conservation; ï‚· Reclamation and new land ï‚· Rehabilitation or modification of development; existing industrial facilities (small ï‚· Resettlement and all projects with scale); potentially major impacts on ï‚· Rehabilitation of highways or rural people; roads; ï‚· River basin development; ï‚· Energy efficiency and energy ï‚· Thermal and hydropower conservation development; ï‚· Manufacture, transportation, and use of pesticides or other hazardous and/or toxic materials Note: *Large scale here is defined as enterprises with annual sales of US$ 3 million or more equivalent 47. Screening criteria. The selection of the category should be based on professional judgment and information available at the time of project identification. If the project is modified or new information becomes available, Bank EA policy permits to reclassify a project. For example, a Category B project might become Category A if new information reveals that it may have diverse and significant environmental impacts when they were originally thought to be limited to one aspect of the environment. Conversely, a Category A project might be reclassified as B if a component with significant impacts is dropped or altered. The option to reclassify projects relieves some of the pressure to make the initial decision the correct and final one. 48. Projects in Category B often differ from A projects of the same type only in scale. In fact, large irrigation and drainage projects are usually Category A, however, small-scale projects of the same type may fall into Category B, the same relates to aquaculture projects and many others. Projects entailing rehabilitation, maintenance or upgradingrather than new construction will usually be in Category B. A project with any of these characteristics may have impacts, but they are less likely to be “significantâ€?. However, each case must be judged on i ts own merits. Many rehabilitation, maintenance and upgrading projects as well as privatization projects may require attention to existing environmental problems at the site rather than potential new impacts. - 15 - Therefore, an environmental audit may be more useful than an impact assessment in fulfilling the EA needs for such projects. 49. The selection of a screening category often depends also substantially on the project setting, while the “significanceâ€? of potential impacts is partly a function of the natural and socio-cultural surroundings. There are a number of locations which should cause to consider an “Aâ€? classification: ï‚· in or near sensitive and valuable ecosystems - wetlands, natural areas, habitat of endangered species; ï‚· in or near areas with archaeological and/or historical sites or existing cultural and social institutions; ï‚· in densely populated areas, where resettlement may be required or potential pollution impacts and other disturbances may significantly affect communities; ï‚· in regions subject to heavy development activities or where there are conflicts in natural resource allocation; ï‚· along watercourses, in aquifer recharge areas or in reservoir catchments used for potable water supply; and ï‚· on lands and in waters containing valuable natural resources (such as fish, minerals, medicinal plants; agricultural soils). 50. The World Bank’s experience has shown that precise identification of the project’s geographical setting at the screening stage greatly enhances the quality of the screening decision and helps focus the EA on the important environmental issues. 51. World Bank Public Consultation and Disclosure requirements. For all Category A and B projects proposed for WB financing, during the EA process, the borrower consults all involved parties, including project-affected groups and local nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) about the project's environmental aspects and takes their views into account. The borrower initiates such consultations as early as possible. For Category A projects, the borrower consults these groups at least twice: (a) shortly after environmental screening and before the terms of reference for the EA are finalized; and (b) once a draft EA report is prepared. In addition, the borrower consults with such groups throughout project implementation as necessary to address EA-related issues that affect them.For meaningful consultations between the borrower and project-affected groups and local NGOs, the borrower provides relevant material in a timely manner prior to consultation and in a form and language that are understandable and accessible to the groups being consulted. For a Category A project, the borrower provides for the initial consultation a summary of the proposed project's objectives, description, and potential impacts; for consultation after the draft EA report is prepared, the borrower provides a summary of the EA's conclusions. In addition, for a Category A project, the borrower makes the draft EA report available at a public place accessible to project-affected groups and local NGOs. Any Category B EIA report for a project proposed for WB financing is made available to project-affected groups and local NGOs. Public availability in the borrowing country and official receipt by the Bank of Category A reports for projects proposed for WB financing, and of any Category B EA report for projects proposed for WB funding, are prerequisites to Bank appraisal of these projects. 52. Figure 1 presents the different steps in the project cycle and shows how the various EA phases fit in the project preparation process. The main EA phases concern screening, scoping, - 16 - EA, and environmental management plan during and after implementation of the project - Figureand covering mitigation, monitoring 3.1 evaluation. EA and the World Bank Project Cycle Project Cycle Environmental Assessment No EA required C Screening Identification Pre-feasibility Study B A Scoping & Public Scoping & Public Con- Consultation sultation (as appropriate) ToR and EA Team ToR and EA Team Feasibility Study Selection Selection Preparation EA Preparation: EA Preparation: - Examine alternatives - Assess impacts; and/or - Assess impacts - Mitigation plan; or Project Planning and - EMP's - Carry out Audit; or Detailed Design - Assess hazards Appraisal Review Environmental Review EA Report & Project Appraisal Section in Appraisal Public Consultation Report Loan Negatiation Negotiation Loan Approval Implementation Monitoring Environmental Quality Project Implementa- tion and Supervision Monitoring Mitigation Measures Implementation Completion Report Evaluate EA Report Evaluation Evaluate Mitigation Plan Performance Audit and OED Evaluation Evaluate Institution Capacity Figure 1. Environmental Assessment and the World Bank project cycle The Comparison of National and World Bank Environment AssessmentRequirements 53. Overview. While the basic provisions of the National EA rules and procedures are to some extent similar to the WB requirements, there are several important differences. These differences are related primarily to the following: (a) project environmental screening categories; (b) Environmental Management Plan; (c) EA disclosure and public consultation; and (d) EA reviewing process. - 17 - 54. Differences in screening categories. In Uzbekistan the EIA systems are based on the SEE developed in Soviet times. SEE is regulated by Law (No 73-II.25.05.2000) on Ecological Expertise and by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers (No 491.31.12.2001) on approval of the Regulation of the State Environmental Expertise. The Regulation stipulates 4 categories for development: Category I (High Risk), Category II (Middle Risk), Category III (Low Risk), and Category IV (Local Impact). In the case where World Bank and national categorization/EA requirements differ, the more stringent requirement will apply. This refers mostly in the case of deciding about Category C subprojects - the national EA legislation doesn’t refer to small scale activities, including construction and rehabilitation of various buildings. In these cases the client will apply the WB criteria. 55. Differences concerning EMP.While the national legislation requires for all projects with potential environmental impacts relevant mitigation measures, it doesn’t require a special EMP which should specify, along with the proposed mitigation activities a monitoring plan and reporting requirements, institutional arrangements for EMPs implementation as well as doesn’t require needed capacity building activities and necessary expenses in this regard. However, for sub-projects that are financed under the Credit component, EMPs will be required to be prepared by the borrower to comply with World Bank requirements. The EMF includes finances for training PFIs and credit borrowers on preparation of EMPs. 56. Differences concerning reviewing and approval of EA studies. As mentioned above, the national EA reviewing process relates to the SEE, while according the World Bank requirements is a part of the whole EA process. The SEE seeks to examine the compliance of proposed activities and projects with the requirements of environmental legislation. The mentioned laws stipulate the mandatory cross-sectoral nature of SEE, which shall be scientifically justified, comprehensive, and objective and which shall lead to conclusions in accordance with the law. SEE precedes decision-making about activities that may have a negative impact on the environment. Financing of programs and projects is allowed only after a positive SEE finding, or conclusion, has been issued. In compliance with World Bank policy, all EAs for sub-project financed under the Access to Credit component will go through the more stringent review and approval process of the World Bank, as outlined in Annex 2. 57. Differences with regard to disclosure and public consultation. Conducted analysis shows there is no harmonization between World Bank and national requirements in this regard. According to national legislation, the EA disclosure and public consultation is mandatory only for category I and II. At the same time,according to the SEE law the public environmental review can be carried out on the initiative of NGOs and citizens in any field and for all types of project categories, which needs to be environmentally justified. Public environmental review can be carried out regardless of the state ecological expertise. Conclusion of public environmental review has recommendatory nature. In the case of World Bank EA policy, the Sub-borrower is responsible for conducting at least one public consultation for all Category B projects to discuss the issues to be addressed in the EMP or to discuss the draft EMP itself. Therefore, for the Sub- project, the RRA will review any documentation of the public consultation conducted in the preparation of any Uzbek EA documentation to determine if it is consistent with the World Bank requirements. If the Uzbek public consultation is satisfactory, there would be no further consultation requirement. However, if no public consultation was conducted or the RRA determines that the Uzbek public consultation documentation is not adequate, the Sub-borrower will be required to perform at least one public consultation to discuss the environmental issues of concern to the locally affected communities and include these issues in the content of the EMP. - 18 - Documentation for the consultation should be submitted to the RRA as part of the Sub-project file. Uzbek language and/or local language versions of the EMP and the record of the public consultation should be placed at a public location near the project site and on the Sub-borrower website. Category B EA sub-project would be made available to project-affected groups and local NGOs in an easily accessible PFI and/or RRA website. 58. Applicable Environmental Standards: Sub-projects requiring an EMP will include mitigating actions to assure compliance with environmental standards of performance. If both Uzbek and World Bank standards exist for a particular mitigating measure, the stricter of the two standards will apply. For example, if the environmental issue of concern is ―noise and the World Bank noise standard is stricter than the Uzbek one, the mitigating measure selected should meet the stricter World Bank standard4. III. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIALENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 59. General Impacts: The sub-projects to be implemented under the Credit Line will generate a great number of both direct and indirect positive social and environmental impacts. Direct positive impacts will be generated by increased production, products and goods which would result in creation of new jobs and respectively, more employment and increased income. Indirect positive impacts will relate to overall improving of business environment, introduction of advanced agricultural technologies and techniques, contribution to poverty reduction and food safety. Potential indirect adverse social impacts can be related to increase water pollution due to more usage of chemicals in agriculture. A separate social assessment is currently under preparation and aims to identify social issues to be addressed throughout the project implementation. The social assessment report will be disclosed upon completion. The project will also participate in the Third Party Monitoring (TPM) and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) set up by the World Bank for the agricultural portfolio in the country to focus on issues of child and forced adult labor. The TPM/ GRM will be funded by a separate TF. The potential negative environmental impacts of the proposed project are expected to derive from the Access to Credit component, and are expected to be small as was the case in RESP-I and II. The proposed works do not include any investment in new infrastructure that would allow increased water abstraction from main sources and/or discharges of waste waters. 60. It is realistic to expect that the effects of some project components will strengthen the sustainability of agriculture which combines technologies, policies, and activities aimed at integrating socioeconomic principles with environmental concerns so as to maintain or enhance horticulture production, reduce the risk of diminishing productivity, protect natural resources, develop the capacity to map pests and diseases and improve quality and food safety standards, all with a view to be economically viable, socially acceptable and technically feasible. Hence it could be safely concluded that in implementing this project, no significant negative impacts are expected. Below table summarizes the expected main benefits of the Project. Table 3: Expected main beneficial impacts of the Project 4 World Bank Group environmental standards are found in the Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines, updated in April 2007. - 19 - Project intervention Impact Value 1. Agricultural Suppport Services Strengthening capacities of two research institutes Improved planting materials, disease and pest Positive identification and soils tests as well as facilitated labs Maping of pests and diseases Identificated pests and diseases Positive Creating demonstration plots Improved knowledge about new technologies Positive of production of horticulture products Strengthening the public-private institutions that Improved market information, learned Positive facilitate agricultural input and output markets successful policies from countries with advanced horticultural subsectors Designing of guidelines and requirements of safety Translated into Uzbek various international Positive hazards and protecting consumers fruit and vegetable quality requirements and developed manuals of quality and packaging requirements for various products as well as developed good production, handling , and pesticide residue management practices 2. Access to Credit Finance such investments as new cultivar, Development of horticulture sector in Various seeds/seedlings, water-saving irrigation facilities Uzbekistan impacts (such as drip irrigation), cold storage and other cold (see Table chain facilities, and value added 4 and 5 handling/processing equipment and facilities below) Capacity building program for Financial Improved qualification on applicability of the Positive Institutions new financial products in lending to agriculture, assessing the suitability and effectiveness of these new financial products, and on mitigation of the related risks 3. Project management and monitoring Design and supervision of construction, Increased sustainability of Project outputs Positive institutional strengthening, monitoring of Project impact 61. Potential Benefits and Impacts – Agriculture support services: The objective of this component is to bridge the knowledge and experience gap related to new production, storage, post-harvest handling (PHH), and marketing knowledge and experience in Uzbekistan. The component would support activities that would lead to improved farm economics, better quality of investment and marketing decisions, higher quality of produce, and subsequently would boost exports and rural employment. The component will comprise the following sub-components: (i) Strengthening capacities of research institutes, (ii) Strengthening the public-private institutions that facilitate agricultural input and output markets, (iii) Safety hazards and protecting consumers.The objective of this component is to bridge the knowledge and experience gap related to new production, storage, post-harvest handling (PHH), and marketing knowledge and experience in Uzbekistan. Taking into consideration abovementioned the proposed project activities would provide many environmental and social benefits such as improved farmer skills in land conservation and IPM practices. 62. Potential Benefits and Impacts – Access to Credit: The objective of this component is to enhance access to financial services for agribusinesses operating in Uzbekistan’s horticulture sector, in particular towards enhanced competitiveness of the sector, improved quality and food safety standards, and establishment of market linkages.While generally the project will provide many environmental and social benefits, it may also cause some negative impacts. Expansion of areas under horticulture and intensified horticulture practices could result in increased water use - 20 - and use of inputs, including pesticides and chemical fertilizers. The project may also support import of alien varieties of fruits, nuts and vegetables, which could result in loss of native species biodiversity and introduction of new pests and diseases, which could be aggravated by climate change effects already being seen in Uzbekistan. Sub-projects anticipated for financing under the credit line if not adequately implemented, may cause some environmental impacts related to: (a) increased pollution of ground and surface waters due to soil erosion, use of fertilizers and pesticide, as well as the processing of agricultural products; (b) threats to human health and wildlife due to poor handling of fertilizers and pesticides; (c) increased siltation of water bodies due to soil erosion; (c) solid wastes during processing of agricultural products. 63. Potential Benefits and Impacts: Agricultural Enterprises. Potential benefits and impacts for several major enterprise groups presented in Tables4 and 5 below. A rating for the potential impact, the residual impact and the risk is also provided. Good practice mitigation measures are described in the environmental management section below. 64. The major potential impacts associated with the agricultural enterprise categories include water and air quality deterioration, loss of biodiversity and impacts on biophysical resources, including vegetation cover losses and soil erosion. Most of the benefits presented in the table are socioeconomic. However, it is the biophysical resource base that supports much of the rural economic activity (e.g. soil, water, forests, and mineral resources). Table 4. Potential Benefits and Impacts: Agricultural Enterprises Level of Benefits Potential Impacts Significance Broad Category of Impact Horticulture/Agro- Provision of secondary production to local Water and soil pollution, Moderate processing farmers, thus providing a guaranteed market for safety and health, farm produce and providing them with a steady biophysical and cultural income. Opportunities for export markets. losses through location Provision of jobs. Construction of Improved storage and quality of products and Soil erosion and pollution, Low to cold storage and better market opportunities land degradation, air Moderate other facilities pollution, noise pollution Other agribusiness Improvement of supply chain, resulting in Low stabilized markets and farm income. Improved production and stabilized incomes. Provision of jobs. 65. As the rural economy grows, the onus will be on the Government of Uzbekistan to ensure that relevant environmental regulations are in place, maintained and enforced. The economic development of the rural areas must be sustainable, and the naturalresources that provide the basis for this development must be protected and managed. 66. Potential Benefits and Impacts: Farm Inputs: These impacts apply to both small and medium scale farms. A summary of the benefits, potential impacts and their level of significance is given in Table 5. Table 5. Summary of Benefits and Potential Environmental Impacts – Farm Inputs - 21 - Level of Input Benefits Potential Impacts Significance of Impact Seed Production; increased farm income; improvement of Water and soil Low- rural economy; contribution towards national security contamination through moderate chemical inputs Pedigree seed Increased production; increased farm income; rural Biodiversity loss; Moderate- economy improved; contribution towards national chemical inputs high food security Fertilizer and Increased production; increased farm income; rural Water pollution, air pesticides economy improved; contribution towards national pollution, human and food security animal health risks, Moderate- and ecological high disruption due to impacts on non-target organisms, Land Increased production; increased farm income; rural preparation economy improved; contribution towards national Moderate- (tractor and food security Soil erosion high machinery hire) Tractors Reduces labor burden on farm family; improves farm Soil compaction and Moderate- efficiency; improves profits and rural economy erosion high Other farm Reduces labor burden on farm family; improves farm None None implements efficiency; improves profits and rural economy Small Reduces labor burden on farm family None None equipment Primary Value added stays in rural areas leading to improved Water pollution Moderate processing local economy through provision of jobs; improved equipment farm income; reduction in transportation costs and fossil fuel consumption 67. The major potential impacts associated with the potential agricultural inputs relate to water and soil quality, soil erosion, salinization and resource loss. Tractors and land preparation can promote erosion, particularly if tractors are too heavy and cause soil compaction, and if fields are ploughed (with or without the contour) and left for long periods before sowing. Where land is under some other use such as wetland, or forest cover on steep slopes, conversion to agricultural use poses a potential loss of biodiversity, habitat and species. As well, erosion risks may be increased, particularly on steep sites. 68. Potential Benefits and Impacts: Pesticides: Increasing pesticide applications can lead to pesticide residue (including heavy metals) build up in the soil. Pesticides and fertilizers can migrate to both surface waters and groundwater resulting in contamination of these two sources and leading to damaged aquatic ecosystems and threatened health to downstream users and the . possible development of pests resistant to pesticides and/or destruction of natural enemies of crop pests, both of which can lead to even greater use of pesticides. In assisting borrowers to manage pests that affect agriculture, the Bank supports a strategy that promotes the use of biological or environmental control methods and reduces reliance on synthetic chemical pesticides. In Bank-financed projects, the borrower addresses pest management issues in the context of the project's environmental assessment. - 22 - 69. Use of pesticides is a common practice in Uzbekistan, and hence it may occur under the HDP components that provide credits to small and medium size agribusinesses, whether it is financed by the project or not. However, the application of pesticides in the project areas is not expected to be significant, given the small size of the individual farmer land holdings and experiences drawn from the RESP I and II projects. 70. Current system of pest control and overall Governments policy in handling dangerous pesticides is reasonable, but its implementation is not sufficiently strong. After independence, there were still practices for using dangerous pesticides countrywide that were widely used during Soviet Union. However, Government has taken initiative to reduce application of hazardous agricultural chemicals and pesticides and develop sound environment to improve pest management in late 1990’s. 71. Potential Cumulative Impacts(Access to Credit Component): Assuming that all mitigation is carried out on all sub-projects for which financing is provided, there will still be residual effects, that when considered in total, could have an overall significant effect on the environment. The major environmental concerns, as described in sections above, are water pollution and soil erosion, and the consequences and secondary effects that erosion will cause. 72. Considering the small size of most sub-projects, it would be easy to dismiss the negative effects that each sub-project might have on the environment. For instance, it is anticipated that small farmers will request modest loans for the purchase of basic farm inputs of seed, fertilizers, fuel. Such a loan to a single farmer would present little environmental concern and a large number of such small loans spread throughout the total project area would have a relatively negligible effect. However, if by chance a large number of requests for loans originated from the same area, and more importantly from the same watershed, the cumulative effect of all of the small (negligible) effects could be significant. 73. Cumulative effect is important in spatial terms, as indicated above, and also over time. For instance, a loan for seed purchase in itself has no negative impact, and in fact, has much the opposite with an increased production and return to the farmer. However, the same loan provided for more than two years in a row could promote poor crop and land management and disrupt a relatively current good agricultural management system characterized by long rotations. By avoiding a crop rotation program the farmer can deplete the fertility and organic content of his soil and further promote soil erosion. Over time there would be a cumulative effect. 74. Farmers should not be denied loans on the basis of their location, but if patterns appear to show concentrations of loans (e.g. fertilizers) in one watershed, the RRA environmental specialist should alert the PFIs and local environmental authorities and the PIU office for special monitoring of the situation. If the cumulative effects have the potential to become severe, lending for the activity should be suspended. 75. Another example applied to small and medium enterprises is the application of loans for rehabilitation or for the start-up of new businesses. With agroprocessing and other agrobusinesses, the environmental concerns usually focus on air emissions and effluent discharge. In the case of air emissions, there are usually standards in place that guide the concentration of various emissions at the stack. Although each industrial activity may have emission controls within well established national standards, cumulatively, all of the enterprises in one region (e.g. in a small closed valley with poor air circulation) could significantly - 23 - contribute to the deterioration of overall air quality, resulting in an impact on human health. Similarly for water quality, a number of enterprises releasing effluents into a water body could cumulatively affect the quality of the water in a significant manner even though each enterprise may be releasing very small amounts of effluent that meet set standards. 76. The other aspect of cumulative effects of the overall project is the accumulation of a large number of very small impacts over the full range of project-funded activities. That is, the cumulative impact of all of the small impacts as a result of a number of loans for agricultural machinery purchase, added to the cumulative impact of all of the small impacts from the non- farm enterprises. The overall cumulative impact could be significant. Since many of these activities can have an effect on water quality, the overall effect on water quality could be significant. 77. In a comprehensive examination of cumulative effects, an analysis would be made of all the various other activities taking place that have impacts, for instance, other programs that could be providing agricultural lines of credit; forestry programs that could be contributing to soil erosion; and in the same vein, road construction activities and other general construction that could add to the soil erosion problem. Although the HDP cannot be concerned about the effects of other projects, it is important to place the Project and the effects that it does have on the environment within the context of the overall development picture. 78. In order to prevent the risk of adverse cumulative environmental effects, a brief environmental analysis will be made of the portfolio every year by the RRA environmental specialist and reported to the relevant authorities in the Goskompriroda and the World Bank. 79. Mitigation of Environmental Impacts: For agricultural activities under Access to Credit component mitigation should not necessarily entail expensive inputs and much can be achieved towards the minimizing of residual impacts through applying efficient and safe farming techniques. The Rural Advisory Services sub-component of the Project will be in a position to advise farmers on the proper handling and application of pesticides and fertilizers, including application rates and timely application. As well, it can advise on effective cultivation techniques (including the size of tractors and the type of equipment to be engaged) that will reduce the threat of soil erosion and compacting. Irrigation schemes can be well planned in order to avoid the loss of productive land through salinization and waterlogging. 80. Adherence to water and air quality standards (Maximum Allowable Emissions) that are calculated for each enterprise will be monitored by local environmental agencies to ensure that water and air quality are protected. 81. Recommended mitigation measures for farm inputs and some categories of agro- businesses are addressed in the following section on environmental management guidelines. Guidance and best practice for preparation of mitigation plans is attached at Annex 3. 82. To further ensure that environmental concerns are given proper consideration, the RRA environmental specialist will advise on environmental aspects of Access to Credit Component, as well as conduct overall project environmental monitoring. Similarly the RRA environmental specialist will provide advice and monitoring to PFIs regarding environmental screening of small and medium credit applications. - 24 - 83. Environmental Risk: Overall, the environmental risk is low to moderate, with due attention to the possibility of cumulative impacts. The project will benefit from the institutional capacity developed under RESP I and II which stressed awareness of safeguard policies. The project’s information and advisory service activities will continue to promote the adoption of improved and environmentally sound technologies, provide training and advice on integrated pest management techniques as well as on improved use and handling of fertilizer and agro- chemicals. 84. The rural finance activities related to PFIs will deal with fairly small loans which are expected to be used for agricultural inputs and implements, equipment and trading activities with a minimal environmental impact. Members of PFIs involved in lending will also be provided with training on the potential environmental impact of sub-projects and on mitigation measures. Mid-size credits for agro-processors and other agribusinesses through qualifying PFIs will be required to include mitigating measures, if appropriate. 85. Compliance with the EMF guidelines will be monitored by the RRA environmental specialist. - 25 - IV. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES 86. General: This EMF includes specific management activities that will be followed for ensuring that any Category B type sub-project financed by HDP receives an appropriate environmental assessment (Category A suprojects will be not supported unde the HDP). The responsibility for recognizing the environmental category of loan applications under Access to Credit component rests with the loan officers of the various lending institutions. 87. Management: The RRA will be responsible for overall Project implementation. It will hire a consultant with an environmental background to ensure implementation of the Project in compliance with the EMF. The individual must be able to recognize an activity for which a sub- project or loan is being sought that may fall into Category A, B or C of the World Bank and ensure that the EMF guidelines are followed. The same consultant will maintain a working relationship with the relevant officers in the Goskompriroda and the relevant environmental inspectorates. As well, this individual will have a working relationship with the PFIs and will provide assistance in cases where determining the category of a particular activity that has been proposed for financing may be in question. 88. Mitigation: Mitigation of any environmental effects from Rural Finance activities will be the responsibility of the activity proponent. However, it will also be the responsibility of the PFIs and the RRA to ensure that mitigation is carried out successfully for sub-projects of Category B and some sub-projects of Category C as it might be required. This responsibility will be reflected in an effective established monitoring system. Annex 3 (Tables 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3) provide suggestions for agricultural and non-agricultural rural activity good practices, which, if followed, will prevent many of the potential impacts from occurring. 89. Most mitigation for the various activities that have been suggested as likely candidates for financial support can be conducted through the application of sound practices. Often it is a choice of how an activity is conducted – between the right way and wrong way with little, if any, additional cost to the activity’s proponent. However, often the proponent will not be aware of an approach that will minimize the environmental effects. The Agricultural Support Services component of the Project will have an important role to play in directing farmers and agribusinesses towards best practices in order to eliminate or reduce environmental impacts as these are related to the various farm inputs that would be sought through the credit program. For example, if a borrower has purchased a tractor, cultivating with the contour as opposed to against the contour will significantly reduce erosion. 90. A format for a mitigation plan is attached in Annex 2 (Form 1; Number 5) 91. Monitoring: Monitoring of all activities within the Access to Credit component of the Project will be the responsibility of the RRA. The environmental specialist of the RRA will follow an effective monitoring procedure. 92. With the potential of hundreds of small and medium loans it will not be feasible to monitor all of them on regular basis. The RRA environmental specialist will select a sampling of individual activities within categories of activities for regular monitoring purposes. A number of activities will be environmentally benign and as such will not require monitoring on a regular basis. Nevertheless, they should be examined on occasion to ensure that this EA did not - 26 - overlook any potential impacts. Rural enterprise activities should be monitored regularly on a random sample basis. 93. The RRA environmental specialist will develop a monitoring procedure and schedule. It will be important that for each category of activity that indicators upon which to base monitoring are identified. However, in reality it will be impossible to collect base line information for all Access to Credit component sub-loans, particularly since the Project is not site specific and investment applications can come from anywhere in the project territory. Indicators may be quantifiably measurable or they may be measured subjectively. Some indicators will require precise measurement, for instance in the case of the water quality indicator to measure the effects of effluent discharge from an agro-processing facility. 94. Once baselines have been established subsequent monitoring missions will measure against this baseline and provide an analysis of changes, if any. 95. From an environmental viewpoint, those groups of projects which have the potential for creating the most serious environmental problems should be given highest priority for sampling. A monitoring report will be prepared indicating monitoring results and a recommendation for actions to be taken, if necessary, to minimize, if not eliminate, any adverse environmental effects. 96. Monitoring plan: The following activities are required for Environmental Monitoring of Access to Credit component implementation: ï‚· The RRA environmental specialist will review the quarterly activity reports submitted by the PFIs, and will conduct random sampling review of 10% of small and medium credit applications every 6 months to verify compliance with the EMP. Review of the credits selected for the random sampling will be based on the environmental screening sheet provided by the PFIs on each loan. The review should include a visit to the activity site, an interview with the applicant, and a consultation with the regional environmental authorities. In sub-projects selected for environmental monitoring, an environmental monitoring plan would be prepared by the RRA environmental specialist. ï‚· Based on the credit activity reports, site visits, and information from local environmental authorities, the RRA environmental specialist will analyze environmental situation by province to determine whether purchases under HDP credit lines has increased, potentially creating cumulative impact. If this occurs, HDP may suspend lending. ï‚· The RRA environmental specialist will review plans for training and advisory services to ensure that sustainable agricultural practices for farmers and agro-business personnel are included, and that environmental due diligence for PFI staff is addressed. 97. If monitoring is to be effective, the recommendations of the monitoring report must be acted upon by the RRA and the PFIs. This could include the removal of the category of activities from future loan considerations. The RRA environmental specialist will work in cooperation with the project M&E specialist to integrate monitoring of EMP implementation into the overall project M&E design. - 27 - 98. Environmental monitoring of long term issues:The Goskompriroda and its local agents has the responsibility to monitor the long-term effects of activities that could have negative environmental impacts, including those of the project. This may include monitoring by its staff, or by specialists contracted to undertake specific monitoring duties. Typically this may include: - Monitoring effluents from production units and factories, and monitoring the water body into which effluents discharge, to ensure no negative impacts; - Monitoring air quality in and around mills to ensure compliance with air quality standards; - Monitoring soil/water conditions in and around chemical and fuel storage depots and chemical mixing plants to ensure no negative impacts; - Monitoring forestry and large scale farming operations to ensure the ecology is being maintained (run-off and erosion); - Monitoring wet-lands or areas of scientific, natural or historic interest where they may be affected by the project. 99. Special environmental studies may also be called for in the event of sudden environmental change near to a sub-project activity. The frequency of monitoring and type of samples analyzed would be dependent on the nature of the pollutant. - 28 - V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES FOR ACCESS TO CREDIT COMPONENT 100. Overview: The purpose of the project Environmental Guidelines is to assist the PFI loan officers, RRA staff, sub-borrowers as well as environmental specialists in determining the potential environmental impacts of sub-projects and specific conditions to each of the sub-project loans to ensure that potential impacts are minimized, if not entirely avoided. The Guidelines provide the anticipated sub-project activities and the impacts that they may have on environmental components as well as mitigation measures to be undertaken to minimize or even prevent impacts on environment. In particular, the PFIs, RRA and loan officers will use the sets of forms presented in the Annex 2 and the best practice examples presented in Annex 3, which will assist them in determining of environmental impacts that can be expected from different types of projects in various sectors. Knowing the impacts to be expected from various types of subprojects, the loan officer as well as the subproject designer/beneficiary can define the mitigation measures required as a condition for the loan. These Guidelines may be also be used for the purpose of environmental monitoring of sub-projects. Since these are only guidelines and the information contained within is generalized, in some instances, the officers would be advised to seek local professional opinion (e.g. agricultural extension staff, research officers, etc.) for more specific information and advices. 101. Rules and Procedures for Credit Sub-projects Environmental Screening and Review: Each sub-loan/lease proposal will undergo an environmental review procedure, as follows: - Credit applicants: complete the form (Annex 2; Form 1) to identify possible environmental impacts of proposed activities, identify and agree to undertake mitigation measures if appropriate. The credit applicants are also responsible for obtaining appropriate permits and approvals that may be required for the particular type of activity to be financed, and are issued by the local authorities responsible for environmental issues. In all cases where an environmental assessment report or environmental monitoring plan are required, these are to be prepared by the credit applicants and, where relevant, submitted to the Goskompriroda (or its Agents), and the EIA report and monitoring plans are to be provided with the credit/grant application. - PFIs: screening of applications including for environmental impacts, ensuring required permits have been obtained. Request RRA to carry out field site visits for on site environmental screening (specifically, for sub-projects classified as category B) to verify the environmental data provided by applicants, assist in identification of mitigation measures, and confirm that the environmental category is appropriate and that the EMP is adequate: - RRA: monitor compliance with EMP; provide advice on specific issues that may arise including EA/EMP preparation assistance to category B projects through site visits; monitor for cumulative impacts; provide training on environmental due diligence to PFIs; provide training and information on sustainable agricultural practices via advisory services component 102. Environmental screening for small and medium credit applications: The Environmental Screening Checklist will be used for for small (upto US100,000 equivalent) and medium-size - 29 - credits (greater than US$100,000 equivalent)5. Sample Environmental Screening Checklist form (Annex 2; Form 1) should be included in the credit application form. The loan officer of the PFI screens applications against the environmental checklist and assigns the environmental category (Annex 2; Form 2). Most small credits will likely fall under Category C, requiring no further action beyond screening. In case of questions regarding environmental impact or appropriate category, the PFI contacts the environmental specialist of the RRA for advice and assistance. If mitigation measures are needed, these are agreed with the applicant and reflected in the credit application. The results of the environmental screening are recorded on the application and maintained with the credit file. 103. It is expected that the majority of mid-size credit sub-projects will fall into category B. The PFI will screen each sub-projectag ainst the environmental checklist (Annex 1) to define the environmental category of the sub-project, review the proposed mitigation measures, and ascertain that all required permits have been obtained and are valid. For sub-projects classified as Environmental Category B, the PFI staff will visit the applicant and project site to ensure that all national requirements are met and conduct a simple EA and identify mitigation measures. If the PFI Loan Officer determines that further assessment or documentation is required to meet World Bank requirements, the RRA environmental specialist would be requested to conduct a field visit to the project site and advise on appropriate actions. The RRA specialist will complete the field visit checklist (Annex 2; Form 4). The applicant will reflect the checklist findings and recommended mitigation measures in the application package. When the RRA visit or initial screening reveals high or significant risks, the applicant will hire a consultant to prepare a full EIA and management plan. The cost of the EIA can be included in the credit amount retroactively, if the credit has already been approved. A final approval of the EA will be issued by the RRA (Annex 2; Form 3). 104. In cases when possible significant adverse impacts are discovered during the Field Site Visit, the Environmental Screening and Field Site Visit Checklists are submitted to the Goskompriroda, which issues a preliminary environmental statement listing potential environmental concerns and mitigation measures and determines whether state ecological expertise is required. If permits from the Goskompriroda are needed, these are to be obtained by the borrower and submitted to the PFI with the sub-project proposal. The credit application package must include guidelines and instructions to the borrower. The Goskompriroda shall issue environmental permits, if required. Only after the RRA receives official approval from Uzbek environmental authorities will the sub-project be considered eligible for an loan from the PFIs. 105. During the project implementation, the PFI should ensure that the environmental mitigation measures are implemented. In the case of non-compliance, the PFI (with assistance of RRA environmental specialist as needed) will investigate the nature and reason(s) for noncompliance, and a decision is taken about what is needed to bring a sub-project into compliance, or whether financing should be suspended. 106. Sub-project Categories: The following environmental categorization for potential types of sub-projects are presented as follows: 5 Based on experience with the on-going RESP II project, the average size of cold storage and agro-processing credits are USD150,000 and USD120,000 respectively, both activities of which are likely to be the main focus of the credit component of the HDP. For this reason, the threshold between small and medium size credits is tagged at USD100,000 for environmental screening and categorization purposes. - 30 - 107. Sub-projects assessed as Category A (high environmental risks).The project will not finance any Category-A sub-projects. 108. Usually the following projects are considered as having “significantâ€? impacts and respectively should be qualified as category A projects: (a) significantly affect human populations or alter environmentally important areas, including wetlands, native forests, grasslands, and other major natural habitats; (b) “significantâ€? potential impacts might be also considered the following: direct pollutant discharges that are large enough to cause significant degradation of air, water or soil; (c) large-scale physical disturbance of the site and/or surroundings; (c) extraction, consumption, or conversion of substantial amounts of forest and other natural resources; (d) measurable modification of hydrologic cycle; (e) hazardous materials in more than incidental quantities; (f) and significant involuntary displacement of people and other significant social disturbances. It is expected the supported sub projects will be not related to mentioned above circumstances and respectively will not have significant environmental impacts. In the case such project will be presented for financing, they will be rejected. 109. There are a number of locations which should be considered while deciding to qualify the project as category “Aâ€?: (a) in or near sensitive and valuable ecosystems — wetlands, wild lands, and habitat of endangered species; (b) in or near areas with archaeological and/or historical sites or existing cultural and social institutions; (c) in densely populated areas, where resettlement may be required or potential pollution impact and other disturbances may significantly affect communities; (d) in regions subject to heavy development activities or where there are conflicts in natural resource allocation; along watercourses, in aquifer recharge areas or in reservoir catchments used for potable water supply; and on lands or waters containing valuable resources (such as fisheries, minerals, medicinal plants, prime agricultural soils); and (e) in or near areas with a history of industrial activity that utilizes or generates hazardous materials (i.e. potential significant legacy pollution issues). Similarly as above, the project will not support any projects located in the proximity of mentioned areas 110. Sub-projects assessed as Category B, (moderate environmental risks)may require Secondary Screening during appraisal, and are expected to require a basic EA and mitigation and monitoring arrangements. Annex 1 provides examples of Category A, B and C sub-projects. Based on the results of the screening, the environmental requirements would be one of the following: (a) simple Environmental Management Plan for projects with minor impacts that are typical for different agricultural and/or food processing activities; EMP Checklists - for small scale construction and reconstruction projects); (b) simple EA and EMP for Category B projects which are located in areas new natural habitats; and (c) regular EA and EMP, - for more complex projects. For expansion of existing facilities or where change of technology is proposed, an environmental audit may be required, and/or environmental due diligence procedure, depending on the nature of the sub-project.Such procedure would include collecting and checking relevant information and documents regarding environmental performances of selected enterprise (see Table 6). The first two category B subprojects for each PFIs will be subject to prior review and then – post review by the World Bank. - 31 - Table 6 - Environmental Eligibility Checklist for the Existing Enterprise and Screening Criteria for the Proposed Project No. Criteria N/A Yes No Comments 1 Does the enterprise have a valid If no, (a) all required operating permit, licenses, licenses/permits/approvals etc. approvals etc.? must be obtained prior to project approval, or (b) the project investment must include funds to obtain them 2 Does the enterprise meet all Uzbek If no, (a) the facility must take environmental regulations corrective measures to meet all regarding air emissions, water environmental regulations prior to discharges and solid waste project approval, or (b) the management? investment must include funds to meet them. 3 If the enterprise has any significant If the enterprise has outstanding outstanding environmental fees, liabilities, it must take corrective fines or penalties or any other measures to remove them prior to environmental liabilities (e.g. project approval. pending legal proceedings involving environmental issues etc.) will the investment be used to correct this condition? 4 If any complaints were raised by If yes, the PFIs should examine local affected groups or NGOs the nature of the complaints and regarding conditions at the facility, actions taken to address them. If will the investment be used to there are significant unresolved remedy these complaints? complaints, the PFIs should consult with the WB regarding appropriate actions. 111. Sub-projects assessed as Category C (sub-projects having no significant environmental issues) require no Secondary Screening. 112. Secondary Screening: In the cases of more complex Category B subprojects, a Secondary Screening may be conducted to establish the veracity of the environmental data provided by the sub-project proponent. Secondary Screenings will be done at the request of the PFI as part of sub-project appraisal. The completed Secondary Screening form (Annex 2; Form 4 – Field Site Visit Checklist) will be entered in the project files. Secondary Screening during site inspection can be done by PFIs representatives and includes updating and physical verification of all data provided in the credit application: - Confirm actions taken since submittal of the credit application; - Environmental data provided by the applicant is correct; - No potential environmental issues have been ignored; - The environmental category classification is appropriate; - Environmental management and monitoring plan is adequate; - EIA report has been completed (where required); - Statutory environmental permits have been received and are adequate; - Stakeholder consultations are complete (Annex 5); - Confirm that no land aquistion is to be financed, nor resettlement triggered. - 32 - 113. In cases where Secondary Screening substantially modifies any of the above, the Environmental Screening Category and the Environmental Management Plan may need to be revised. The sub-project must not be financed by the PFI until the revisions have been accepted and checked by the RRA. 114. For Category B project the subborrower shall prepare an EMP. The TORs for the EIA and EMP is presented in Annex 6. For small scale construction and reconstruction activities the borrower may prepare an EMP Checklist, provided in the Annex 7. 115. Rejection of sub-project: If the sub-project is rejected on environmental grounds after an unsatisfactory site visit, an improved environmental proposal may be submitted by the proponent, and re-appraised as above. Re-appraisal should be restricted to one improved proposal, and the proponent should not expect to make multiple applications on the basis of continuous marginal improvements to the scheme. Re-appraisal should be at the discretion of the PFI, and consulted with the RRA. More detailed information is given in Annex 4. 116. Environmental Monitoring: If the credit application is accepted for funding, environmental monitoring will be required for Category B projects in compliance with the environmental management plan (EMP) agreed in the screening procedure. The extent of project monitoring will be dependent on the nature, scale and potential impact of the sub-project. Monitoring may require the services of environmental specialists or a company with laboratory and analytical facilities (for complex environmental problems) or inspection by the local government environmental officer. Environmental monitoring is the responsibility of the RRA. 117. Reporting by the PFIsand the RRA: Credit line PFIs are required to submit quarterly reports to the RRAon the credits financed using WB funds in accordance with uniform reporting formats as prescribedby the Project and agreed by the World Bank. That report would have a section on environment.The RRA will address in physical progress report section of the regular quarterly Financial Management Reports (FMRs) that are to be provided to the Bank. 118. The RRA will address environmental aspects of the financed sub-projects and the related documents (i.e., environmental management plans and mitigation measures) in its routine reporting to the World Bank and during the periodic supervision missions. - 33 - VI. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS 119. A main output of the EA is the institutional strengthening plan for improving the capability for environmental management. This plan is based on the findings of field surveys and public consultations. The following institutional strengthening activities related to the environmental management and monitoring are recommended:  strengthening the RRA capacity by hiring of an Environmental Specialist (ES);  environmental training programme for RRA/PFIs, and training in coordination with other agencies;  agriculture extension and awareness raising programme for key stakeholder groups. 120. Environmental Specialist (ES): The RRA will be responsible for implementation of HDP in compliance with the Environmental Management Framework. The RRA will hire an Environmental Specialist for the duration of the project. The Environmental Specialist will be responsible for environmental monitoring of the Project interventions and its impacts. The ES will be in charge of overall coordination and reporting on the EMF, inspection of environmental compliance at worksites, advising project participants on environmental questions, coordination the overall environmental monitoring at project level, and coordination of the agricultural extension programme. The ES will be responsible for assisting the PFIs in implementation of the Credit component of the project, including reviewing environmental management plans, monitoring their implementation, advising and guiding PFIs on specific environmental issues and management options and ensuring that cumulative impacts are addressed. The ES will also be responsible in identifying training needs of the PFIs, ensure that environmental requirements are integrated into bidding documents for physical investments, and analyzing contracts and application in terms of environmental management and mitigation issues. The ES will be responsible for periodically collecting information on changes and impact of the project activities. ES needs to study the environmental condition of the project area and identify main environmental parameters. The ES will be in charge of overall coordination and reporting on the EMF, inspection of environmental compliance at worksites, advising project participants on environmental questions, coordination the overall environmental monitoring at project level, and coordination of the agricultural extension programme (detailed TOR for ES is given in Annex 8). 121. Training programme: A training program targeting the RRA/PFIs, farmers and other stakeholders will be implemented in the framework of the Project’s institutional component. In particular, it is proposed the PIU environmental specialist should have training course on EA techniques and procedures. For that purpose he/she might visit a similar WB project in other countries in the region (Moldova, Armenia) and/or to hire a consultant who might provide on the job training. In terms of the PFIs, who will be responsible for assisting the sub-borrowers in preparing environmental screening form and identifying potential sub-projects environmental issues, and in approving EA reports and ensuring their implementation, each participating PFI will designate an officer responsible for environmental aspects, review and approvals, who will be trained on environmental issues to designated further environmental assessment responsibilities. 122. In this regard, a special training program would be designed involving representatives from the PFIs. The training program should be practical and include work with realistic case studies, based on actual loan proposals and types of business activities supported by the Project. It should also cover an explanation and practical application of the environmental standards and forms designed for use by the participating financial institutions. The training will cover the following issues: (a) national and World Bank requirements for environmental assessment; (b) - 34 - screening and scoping procedures including checklists of potential environmental impacts of the agricultural production and agro-processing activities; (c) main provisions of environmental management plans for proposed sub projects, including mitigation and monitoring requirements. Field studies also may be included. Such training will enable these target groups to recognize and assess potential negative environmental impacts and set of measures to mitigate them. 123. Training for sub-borrowers. Next the most critical group to be exposed to the importance of the environment concerns includes entrepreneurs from agricultural and agro-processing sectors who will be receiving the loan, and whom should be provided advices on use better available techniques to prevent/ mitigate impact and promote sustainable agriculture and agro- processing technologies. The workshops for this group would include environmental awareness and a practical exercise to observe and learn about sustainable agricultural practices and best available techniques in agro-processing activities. 124. Sustainable Agricultural Extension: Analysis shows that the current agricultural extension, within Project area is weak and needs strengthening particularly in terms of horticulture improvements. The project will include in the Project an agriculture extension component which will enable farmers to gain the full benefit from the Project, i.e. dissemination of improved technologies, effective participation of local stakeholders during the design and construction works, improved skills and empowerment for decision making in integrated water management and environmental protection and enhancement. 125. Requested Budget for EMF Implementation. For the Credit component prepation stage, the funds to be spent for preparing sub projects Environmental Impact Assessments, obtaining of necessary permits and other relevant activities are the responsibilities of sub-borrowers. They will depend on the nature of project proposal, its complexity, scale, etc. At the construction and operation stages, the funds to be spent for installations and other activities to ensure mitigation measures against the environmental impacts from proposed activities is also the responsibility of sub-borrowers. These funds will depend on particular techniques and technologies used for implementing mitigation measures as well as on their scale, number, variety and other factors. At the same time, in order to ensure successful EMF implementation, a series of capacity building activities are necessary for which the project has to provide adequate funding. Estimate budget for proposed capacity building activities and trainings is presented in the Table 7 below. A more detailed budget to cover all EMF related activities (training, capacity building, awareness, independent review and monitoring of EMF implementation) is presented in Annex 9. Table 7. Estimate budget for capacity building activities Target Group Purpose of Training Number of Costs of Workshops/Activities Workshop/Activity in USD A. Environment Management 1. RRA staff, and To ensure that RRA and PFI loan 2 workshops (YR1 7,000/workshop PFIs loan officers officersare aware about importance of the and YR4) environment and know how to recognize the impacts that various funded activitiesmay have on the environment. 2. RRA To provide RRA environmental specialist 2 study tours (YR1 7,500/study tour Environment with knowledge on the screening of the and YR4) - 35 - Specialist projects, EIA process and EIA review/study tour 3. Sub- Environmental awareness and a practical 3 workshops (YR1, 5,000/workshop borrowers/project exercise to observe and learn about YR3 and YR5) beneficiaries sustainable agricultural practices and best available techniques and industry and agriculture 4. To provide farmers with knowledge on 1 two-day workshop 4,000/workshop Farmers/farmer environmental issues and environmental in each province groups management techniques and procedures 5. Loan Officers Training on use of environmental 2 Training workshops 6,000/workshop of PFIs guidelines, how to identify sub projects that (YR1 and YR3 and may fall into one of the Bank’s YR5) environmental categories, and in which case will require a full and/or a partial EIA, and, to identify activities that may affect the environment and in organizing the subprojects EIAs B. Pest Management 6. RRA staff and To ensure that RRA and PFI loan 2 Training workshops 14,000/workshop PFI loan officers officersare aware about environmental and (YR1 and YR4) health related concerns of pesticide us and the value of promoting integrated pest management 7. Sub- Awareness and a practical exercise to 3 Training workshops 5,000/workshop borrowers/project observe and learn about integrated pest (YR1, YR3 and YR5) beneficiaries management practices and best available techniques for horticulture and safe use of pesticides 8. Awareness of safe pesticide usage, storage, 1 two-day awareness 4,000/workshop Farmers/farmer handling and transport porcedures and workshop in each groups environmental and health concerns which province pesticides pose 9. RRA staff Study visits to knowledge of integrated pest 2 study tours of 3-4 15,000/study visit management approaches practiced in persons/study visit neighboring countries or oversees 10. International Review and identification of integrated pest 1 workshop + 2 40,000/workshop consultant management best practice and approaches months fees (YR2) for key horticulture crops in Uzbekistan - 36 - VII. PEST MANAGEMENT 126. Introduction. This section of the EMF deals with pest management and mineral fertilizer use under the project. Pest management issues which can be potentially raised by the project may relate to possible direct purchasing or indirect effect of stimulating greater use of agro-chemicals associated with more intensive cultivation and/ or higher crop value. The objective of pest management frameowork in this regard is to encourage adoption of IPM approach and increase beneficiaries’ awareness of pesticide-related hazards and good practices for safe pesticides use, handling and storage, as well as options for use of alternative non-chemical pest management approaches. 127. Review of existing usage of pesticide and pest management practices in the country 6 Traditionally in Uzbekistan, during last two decades and until recently, only small amounts of pesticides have been used on most crops including orchards, vineyards and vegetable field crops, due to a lack of financial resources and absence of a well-developed in-country pesticide system. Pesticide use was relatively high only for cotton and wheat. However, the last few years has seen increased pesticide use also for other crops. A few shops in the Fergana, Samarkand and Tashkent area now offer pesticides products along with Tashkent-based trading companies licensed to import pesticides. 128. There are between 20-30 different pesticide products generally available in stock in shops, including several highly toxic pesticides. Package size is usually 1 to 10 L or 1 to 10 kg. Smaller amounts (100 ml or 0.5 kg or less) are packed in unlabeled, or inappropriately labeled, flasks and plastic bags, respectively. For dosage and crop use, farmers rely on pesticide seller recommendations and very rarely the label information. The most recent pesticide registration brochure was from 2009 but was not readily available to salesmen and farmers. However, crop wise listings of pesticides, toxicity classification for bees, beneficial insects, and groundwater, as well as an active ingredient index, pesticide law and regulations, safety provisions, mixture calculations and first aid procedures are missing in the pesticide registration brochures. 129. For most field and greenhouse vegetable crops, spraying is done by plastic hand-pump backpack sprayers. Applicators use minimal or no safety equipment, although safety equipment may be available. For orchards, the use of motorized backpack sprayers to propel the spray covering the entire tree is rare. Old tractor-pulled spray booms are used, but the exact calibration of pesticide dosage is not possible due to the lack of good nozzles and good quality replacement parts. Many plastic hand-pump backpack sprayers, even after two or three years, begin to leak at several points at and on the tank, boom and pump handle. Motorized backpack sprayers and tractor driven spray booms have similar leak problems. Despite using more pesticides than required, the leak poses a higher risk for the applicator as clothes are contaminated. Moreover, if clothes exposed to pesticides are not washed after spraying they constitute a permanent source of contamination. Therefore, appropriate personal protection equipment, as well as regular maintenance and proactive repair, are of utmost importance. 130. In terms of pest problems, farmers have difficulty understanding many pest problems, do not efficiently utilize common crop production techniques, and demonstrate deficiencies in recognizing and dealing with pests. They often choose the wrong application times and methods 6 The information in this section draws mainly from the USAID (2009) Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safer Use Action Plan (PERSUAP) - 37 - and are unfamiliar with threshold concepts. In all areas visited, spraying is timed by calendar and not by threshold determinations, favorable infection conditions and pest population development stages. 131. Overall knowledge about IPM is very limited throughout Uzbekistan with the exception of a few, high ranking staff in the crop protection institute, crop protection services and on some farms. Understanding of IPM rational is generally absent, not applied or lost at training, educational, management and farm levels. However, during the Soviet era there was wide use of beneficial insects produced by bio-laboratories for pest control which Uzbekistan maintained, mainly for cotton and wheat, and this bio-laboratory system could be widened. Orchard farmers occasionally try introducing beneficial insects for their crops, but most use insecticide sprays afterwards, killing any previously introduced pest predators or parasites. A history of massive use of highly toxic pesticides resulted in extensive damage to beneficial insects, again most seriously in major cotton and wheat growing areas. Numerous pest problems occurring in Uzbekistan are due to poor crop management practices. Therefore, addressing the interaction between crop and pest management is critical in making IPM relevant for farmers. A deeper understanding of farmers’ management strategies is required to frame meaningful specific IPM recommendations. 132. Attachment 1 provides examples of IPM techniques used in the USA and Europe for the same or similar plant-pest systems that can be tried and integrated to current production systems in Uzbekistan, as well as expand pest control tactics beyond the current dominant role of pesticides. IPM measures are more efficient, if the general good agriculture practice is applied, but this is certainly not presently the case for many crops in Uzbekistan. 133. There is an overall lack of knowledge amongst farmers on the wise application of pesticides, the health and environmental problems associated with haphazard handling, storage and use of pesticides, and the benefits of IPM, training is critical for improving pest management in the country. Specific training should include: pesticide hazards for applicators, consumers, children, farm animals, and wildlife; importance of protective clothing and equipment, drift avoidance, and waiting periods; prohibition to re-use plastic pesticide bottles and other storage and transport packages that might be employed for human or animal consumption, and correct disposal of empty pesticide containers. Extension and dissemination of distribution of knowledge, practical skills and safety precautions is also a urgent need. 134. Policy and Regulations on Pest Management: Current system of pest control and overall Governments policy in handling dangerous pesticides is reasonable, but its implementation is not sufficiently strong. After independence, there were still practices for using dangerous pesticides countrywide that were widely used during Soviet Union. However, Government has taken initiative to reduce application of hazardous agricultural chemicals and pesticides and develop sound environment to improve pest management in late 1990’s. 135. Cotton sub-sector project funded by World Bank was one of the initiators to start addressing this matter in Uzbekistan with involvement of international consultants and organizations, through the Integrated Pest Management Component of the Project. This component intent was to support an applied research program to develop the technology for strengthening and expanding the use of IPM techniques, which integrate biological, chemical and cultural practices for the horticulture sector. This included the proposed development of equipment for improved production and dispersal of beneficial insects and improved application of chemical pesticides. Additionally, the project provided production of training materials in IPM that was commonly used over the years among the agricultural producers and supported in - 38 - drafting of a Pesticide Law. However, the IPM/biocontrol related activities within the project were poorly implemented. A law was approved on August 31, 2000 (116-II) “About protection of agricultural plants from pests, disease and weedâ€?, that clearly defines about regulation on pest management in the country, which took the grass root from a recommendations of an international consultant and was essentially an enabling law, which formed the framework for laws on pesticide use and plant protection in Uzbekistan. 136. In 1999 Government set up special commission for controlling use of pesticides and chemicals – named State Chemical Commission of RUz (Amendment was made to the structure of the organization in 2005) whose main role is to control through registration and banning chemicals and pesticides used in Uzbekistan. Commission comprises from various ministries and agencies, including State Committee for Nature Protection (responsible for assessing the effects of pesticides to the environmental, particularly soil, air and water), Republican Center for Epidemiology (responsible for assessing the effects of pesticides to the human and animal health), and number of research institutes under MAWR and scientific institutions (responsible for testing, screening and identifying the methods for use of pesticides and developing hand outs and manuals) and others. 137. On March 2004, in accordance with Presidential Decree (#148) Republican Center for plant protection and agrochemicals was established under Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources of RUz, to enhance the quality of the services rendered for beneficiaries and improve safety use of agricultural pesticides. Currently this organization has branches in all the districts; however their activities are not well established due to the lack of material resources and generally weakness of the capacity of the organization. 138. Generally control on type of pesticides and chemicals are regulated by the above special commission, and Republican Center for Epidemiology produces various handbooks on safe use of pesticides and chemicals. Number of handbooks under Sanitary Rules and Normative (SanRAN) tag were developed; Hygienic pesticides in surrounding area objects and consumption goods normative (SanRAN - 2001); Sanitary rules and hygienic norms during application, storage and transportation of pesticides in agriculture of Uzbekistan (SanRAN – 2001); Hygienic requirements’ for safety of agrochemicals (SanRAN - 2001); 139. Besides above handbooks and manuals, State Chemical Commission of RUz develop special, simple manuals for application and handling every registered pesticides that are distributed, and in most of the time it is seller (producer, importer) responsibility to produce such manuals. 140. The State Chemical Commission of RUz, annually produces book on pesticides registered in Uzbekistan and for which directions (types of plants and norms) should be applied is indicated. Any unregistered pesticides are forbidden to use and SCC is not responsible for misuse of registered pesticides. Besides this since the establishment of SCC there has been a list of banned for use pesticides and chemicals approved that are highly hazardous and prohibited for use by any individual or organization in the Country. Mainly SCC tries to follow international practices and requirements. Through Ministry of Health RUz, working group of SCC receives latest updates on hazardous technical grade active ingredients in pesticides (categorized into four - 39 - groups) released by World Health Organization; State Committee for Nature Protection assists the SCC to get updated on relevant international environmental treaties and agreements pesticides such as by Rotterdam and Stockholm conventions. Uzbekistan is not a member of these conventions yet but it is planned to become a member in near future. Necessary documentations have been prepared and are currently under review by highest level of the Government. Currently, SCC follows the regulations of the conventions. 141. Hazardous products include pesticides listed in Class I(a) and I(b) of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification (Geneva: WHO, 1994-95); materials listed in the UN Consolidated List of Products Whose Consumption and/or Sale have been Banned, Withdrawn, Severely Restricted, or not Approved by Governments (New York: UN, 1994); and other materials that are banned or severely restricted in the borrower country because of environmental or health hazards. A copy of the national pesticide registration list is appended below at Annex 11. List of banned and severely restricted pesticides is appended below at Annex 12. 142. Principles of the Integrated Pest Management7. The primary aim of pest management is to manage pests and diseases that may negatively affect production of crops so that they remain at a level that is under an economically damaging threshold. Pesticides should be managed to reduce human exposure and health hazards, to avoid their migration into off-site land or water environments and to avoid ecological impacts such as destruction of beneficial species and the development of pesticide resistance. One important strategy is to promote and facilitate the use of IPM through preparation and implementation of an Integrated Pest Management Plan (PMP). The IPM consists of the judicious use of both chemical and nonchemical control techniques to achieve effective and economically efficient pest management with minimal environmental contamination. It provides a coordinated use of pest and environmental information to design and implement pest control methods that are economically, environmentally and socially sound. IPM promotes prevention over remediation and advocates integration of at least two or more strategies to achieve long-term solutions. 143. The World Bank refers to IPM as a mix of farmer-driven, ecologically based pest control practices that seek to reduce reliance on synthetic chemical pesticides. It involves (a) managing pests (keeping them below economically damaging levels) rather than seeking to eradicate them; (b) relying, to the extent possible, on non-chemical measures to keep pest populations low; and (c) selecting and applying pesticides, when they have to be used, in a way that minimizes adverse effects on beneficial organisms, humans, and the environment. In general, IPM combines the following measures: pest monitoring (eg., pest detection, pest population build-up monitoring to apply economic thresholds for pesticide application) and prediction based models (eg., degree- day calculations, software solutions), cultural methods (eg., resistant varieties, crop rotation, cultivation of alternate hosts, selection of planting sites, crop specific traps, adjusting the timing of planting or harvest, crop residue destruction or incorporation, pruning), mechanical methods (collection, hand weeding, barrier exclusion, trapping), physical methods (eg., heat, cold, humidity, traps, sound), and biological methods (eg., introduction of imported natural enemies and protection of indigenous natural pest enemies, dissemination and establishment of microbial control agents). IPM can also include the use of natural chemical methods (eg., attractants, repellents, sterilants and growth inhibitors), plant extracts (eg., neem oil extracts, pyrethrum 7 This section is based on the World Bank Group in the Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines prepared in 2007. - 40 - extracts from Chrysanthemum flowers), genetic methods (eg., release of sterile or genetically incompatible pests that disrupt natural mating), and regulatory means (eg., plant and animal quarantines, suppression and eradication programs). These measures must allow the safe integration of pesticides as the last control resort within farmers’ traditional cropping and pest management systems. Pesticide resistance management strategies include minimizing pesticide use, shunning tank mixes, avoiding persistent chemicals, and using long-term rotations of pesticides. These should involve alternating among pesticide classes with different modes of action to delay or mitigate onset of the existing resistance by pests. 144. Alternatives to Pesticide Application. Where feasible, an effective IPM strategy will attempt to use alternatives to pesticides. This might include a range of biological, mechanical and physical, and cultural alternatives or approaches. It might also involve a more rational use of chemicals, when it is appropriate or as a last resort. Some possible considerations of alternatives to pesticide use are provided in Attachment 3 145. A more detailed list of potential pests and diseases of horticulture crops and currently available IPM approaches of control are provided in Attachment 1. 146. Conservation of Pollinators. Pollinators provide an essential ecosystem service, namely pollination. While, approximately 80 percent of all flowering plant species are pollinated by animals, including vertebrates and mammals, the main pollinators are insects. Maintaining and increasing yields in horticultural crops, seeds and pastures through better conservation and management of pollinators is critically important to obtain better farm incomes for horticulture farmers. 147. The main threats to losing pollinators’ services stem from the following driving forces: ï‚· Habitats required by many pollinators are being lost through changing land-use patterns such as increasing agricultural intensification. Pollinators require a range of resources from their environment for foraging, nesting, reproduction and shelter. The loss of any one of these requirements can cause pollinators to become locally extinct. ï‚· Excessive use or inappropriate application of pesticides and other agro-chemicals is known to have negative impacts on a range of pollinators. ï‚· Climate change may potentially be one of the most severe threats to pollinator biodiversity. Substantial distribution changes are predicted for groups such as butterflies. ï‚· Invasive species are globally recognised to have major negative impacts across a wide range of taxa. 148. In order to protect the decline in populations of pollinators, horticulture farmers will be advised to take measures for pollinator conservation that are directly linked to their farming practices. Practices that promote high diversity on-farm, and can form the basis for a more sustainable path of horticulture growth. The deliberate conservation of pollinators- and its synergy with integrated pest control- offers ways to maintain yields while reducing purchased inputs. Many of the measures that promote pollinators can also promote other ecosystem services such as soil improvement by cover cropping, increasing the abundance of diverse soil functional groups; habitat management of natural enemies for pest management; breaking cycles of damaging pests through greater crop diversity, or erosion control through contour plantings and hedgerows. However, the knowledge base for promoting such pollinator-friendly practices into - 41 - farming systems is very scarce, and the project will support improved knowledge networks that can promote the exchange of such information across regions and crops. 149. Pesticide Application. In the event the use of pesticides is warranted, as a last resort option, users are recommended to take the specific actions to ensure a more safe and sound application of pesticides, a more rational use of chemicals, as well as to reduce and control any potential negative impacts on health and safety, and damage to the environment. Examples of possible precautionary actions to ensure safe and sound application of pesticides are provided in Attachment 4. 150. Pesticide Handling and Storage. Contamination of soils, groundwater, or surface water resources, due to accidental spills during transfer, mixing, and storage of pesticides could be prevented by following the hazardous materials storage and handling recommendations (refer Attachment 4 for examples of best practice in handling and storage of pesticides). 151. Pesticide Disposal. Excess pesticides that are still usable and not deteriorated in quality should be disposed according to directions on the label. If it cannot be used, some manufacturing companies will accept the pesticide for reprocessing. If the above options are not available, check with the local solid waste management authority, environment or health agency whether there are options available for the disposal of the unwanted chemicals. 152. Pesticide containers also pose an environment problem if they are not carefully disposed or cleaned. Some recommendations for disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers are provided in Attachment 4. 153. Health and Safety.By definition, pesticides are poisons, but the toxicity and hazards of different pesticide compounds vary greatly and might be different from organism to organism. Pesticide hazard depends not only on the toxicity, but also on the chance of exposure to toxic amounts of the pesticide. Pesticides can enter the body through oral ingestion, through skin, or through inhalation. There are a number of safety precautions that should be taken when manufacturing, transport, application, storage and handling of pesticides (refer Attachment 4). 154. Typical hazards associated with chemical fertilizer use and remedial measures: Similarly as in the case of the usage of pesticides, fertilizer usage may provide important benefits to horticulture development, but they also pose certain risks associatedwith accidental exposure of environment and of farmers during their inappropriate handling and usage. To ensure minimization of hazards associated with inappropriate handling, storage and usage of mineral fertilizers, a number of measures can be employed. The Table 8 provides information about typical hazard scenarios that that may arise in conjunction with the procurement, handling and storage of fertilizers as well as the recommended measures to control the potential risks. Table 8. Fertilizer Control Strategy Likely Hazard Recommended Control Strategy Scenario Spillage ï‚· Ensure all storage areas and/or facilities are secure and appropriate. ï‚· Ensure all fertilizer products can becontained within the storage area and/or facility selected ï‚· Provide appropriate equipment and materials to clean up a spillage Transportation and ï‚· Cover any loads of fertilizer products whilst in transit - 42 - delivery of goods ï‚· Ensure that deliveries of fertilizer products are made at appropriate times ï‚· Do not accept any containers of fertilizer products that are damaged and/or leaking. ï‚· Ensure that any spillages that occur during delivery are cleaned up appropriately. Drift of dust from ï‚· Keep fertilizer products covered and/or sealed storage areas and/or ï‚· Clean up spillages promptly facilities ï‚· Keep “in useâ€? stocks to the minimum required ï‚· Staff responsible for storage areas and/or facilities to will ensure that the drift of dust beyond the perimeter is kept to a minimum. Storage areas - ï‚· Keep floor surfaces swept clean of fertilizer to prevent tracking by people and/or Floors vehicles beyond the perimeter. ï‚· Sweep up and dispose of spillages in a timely and appropriate manner ï‚· Cross contamination of Keep each fertilizer product will in a separate storage container and/or position within product the facility and/or area. Confusion of Product ï‚· Maintain an accurate storage manifest/register. ï‚· Keep products and blends are segregated at all times. ï‚· Ensure all storage bays and bins are clearly labeled. ï‚· Ensure all storage, loading and blending plant and equipment is cleaned from all residues when changing from one product to another. ï‚· Do not store product in bags that are not correctly stamped Occupational Health ï‚· Contact between fertilizer products, people and livestock will be minimized. and Safety Risk Assessments ï‚· Risk Assessments are required to be conducted on the procurement, storage and handling of fertilizer products. Contact with people ï‚· Managers will develop, implement and monitor the effectiveness of hazard and livestock management procedures ï‚· All persons using fertilizer products are to adhere to the hazard management procedures and adopt safe working practice and ensure that direct contact with fertilizer and the inhalation of fertilizer dust is minimized. ï‚· Managers are to ensure that staff is made aware of any national and industry regulations which have to be observed. Personal Protective ï‚· Staff must be provided with appropriate PPE when using fertilizer products. Equipment Lack of appropriate ï‚· Managers must ensure that appropriate safety warning signs and/or information is warning safety signage displayed/ available regarding nature of hazards and risk control measures. and information Poor housekeeping ï‚· All staff is responsible for implementing sound housekeeping practices in storage areas and/or routine and arranging regular routine maintenance for all equipment used. maintenance Defective &/or ï‚· Conduct regular inspection & testing of equipment and infrastructure to identify what unserviceable plant & maintenance requirements equipment Incorrect or Fertilizer blends to be prepared using the right raw materials in the appropriate inappropriate mixtures proportions. All products will be loaded into spreaders etc in the right condition to the of product right weight. No training ï‚· Staff will undertake appropriate training. Lack of appropriate ï‚· All relevant records and documentation to be kept and maintained eg training records, records &/or risk assessments, maintenance schedules, recipes for fertilizer blends, MSDS’s etc. documentation 155. Use of fertilizers and safety issues relating to its usage and handling: To avoid adverse environmental impacts while using mineral fertilizers it is necessary to comply strictly with a series of requirements, stipulated in the existing legal documents as well as in the fertilizers Guidelines for their handling. The rules and procedures of production, storage, transportation and usage of the mineral fertilizers are reflected in a relatively small number of documents, and most of them were adopted at the time of the USSR. - 43 - 156. Main requirements while using mineral fertilizers. The usage of different mineral fertilizers should be done depending on such factors as type and quality of the soil, type of the crop, system of crop rotation, weather and climate conditions, ways and terms of their application. 157. Special provisions with regard to fertilizers storage is provided in Attachment 5. 158. Special provisions with regard to fertilizers field usageis provided in Attachment 5 as examples to reduce the environmental and health hazards on improper usage. 159. Pest Management Plan (PMP).A PMP should be prepared in all cases of significant direct purchasing and usage of pesticides or if significant pest management issues are anticipated in individual subprojects that are to be financed under the Access to Credit component of the project. Credit applicants will be required to complete a pest management screening checklist (Annex 2, Form 1 Section 3.1) along with the credit application. This screening checklist will require information on the (i) significance of the pest management issues to be addressed (ii) type, amount and anticipated extent of usage of pesticides: (iii) proposed storage, disposal and usage practices to be employed; and (iv) potential environmental impacts. Based on a scoring scheme that is defined in this document, a determination would be made if a full blown PMP would be needed. The content of the PMP should apply to all the activities and individuals working. It should be emphasized also that non-chemical control efforts will be used to the maximum extent possible before pesticides are used. The PMP should be a framework through which pest management is defined and accomplished. The Plan should identify elements of the program to include health and environmental safety, pest identification, and pest management, as well as pesticide storage, transportation, use and disposal. The PMP is to be used as a tool to reduce reliance on pesticides, to enhance environmental protection, and to maximize the use of integrated pest management techniques. 160. The PMP shall typically contain pest management requirements, outlines the resources necessary for surveillance and control, and describes the administrative, safety and environmental requirements. The Plan should provide guidance for operating and maintaining an effective pest management program/ activities. Pests considering in the Plan may be weeds and other unwanted vegetation, crawling insects and other vertebrate pests. Without control, these pests provoke plants’ deceases. Adherence to the Plan will ensure effective, economical and environmentally acceptable pest management and will maintain compliance with pertinent laws and regulations. The recommended structure of a PMP is presented in the Attachment 2. 161. Reviewing and approving PMP. As handling and usage of pesticides and other chemicals might cause harm to the environment and to the farmers’ health, in the case of such types of subprojects the beneficiaries have to prepare a PMP that is attached to the subproject proposal, including the following information: (a) types of pesticides and fertilizers and its amount; (b) storage conditions; (c) ways of field usage; (d) measures to be undertaken to control possible hazard scenarios; and (e) responsible person. The subproject proposal along with the PMP will be reviewed by the PFIs and by the RRA Environment Specialist who will provide his approval. These documents are also subject to World Bank prior review for the first two such types of subprojects from the each PFI. Based on experience of the RESP II, it is anticipated that the use of pesticides and pest management in terms of individual credits would not be significant and could be addressed through training, extension and technical support to improve farmer - 44 - awareness on the safe application, storage and disposal of pesticides and the pest management through extension, training and demonstration in IPM approaches. 162. Operational Plan: The objective of the Pest Management in the HDP is to promote environmentally friendly (hygienic, cultural, and biological or natural) control mechanisms and the judicious use of chemicals in pest control and effectively monitor pesticide use. Implementation of pest management activities under the Project would entail education, training and communication that is defined in a Pest Management Operational Plan. The pest management operational plan defines a broad menu of options for managing and monitoring pest control and pesticide usage under the project. The RRA will be responsible for communicating the content of the Pest Management Operational Plan to PFI and farmers. It would establish channels of on-going communication with the PFI and farmer associations, organize orientation workshops and training on IPM techniques as well as the pest management operational plan requirements, which will be at the forefront in terms of use of pesticides and are likely to be exposed to its various and gradual risk. 163. RRA will create awareness among project farmers of the importance of pest and pesticide management in the framework of this Pest Management Operational Plan and avenues created or available for obtaining appropriate pesticides among other things. It will also ensure that all farmers have access to information on relevant crop pests and diseases, potential IPM strategies regarding pest control, current list of registered and banned pesticides and information kits would be developed (in local understood languages) on methods for safe use, handling, storage and disposal of pesticides and the consequent environmental and health related impacts of improper use of these pesticides. Table 9. Pest Management Operational Plan Impact issue/pest Desirable Implementation Expected Monitoring Responsibility/ and pesticide threat Mitigation tool result indicators Key and risk Measures implementing actors Pollution of water Control, Awareness of Farmers Number of RRA, Farmers resources and manage and proper application trained in farmers Groupsand aquatic life supervise and disposal of sound trained, Farmers pesticide use by pesticides and application Training farmers oversight and disposal records methods Proper disposal Pesticide Pesticide Number of RRA, Farmers of pesticide container container farmers/ Groupsand containers by collection and disposal plan resellers Farmers resellers/farmers disposal being aware of plan/arrangements implemented pesticide in place by by farmer container farmers disposal needs Improper use of Educate farmers Pesticide hazards Proper use of Number of RRA, Farmers pesticides by farmers and farm and use guide pesticides by cases of Groups and and farm workers workers on leaflet for the farmers and pesticide Farmers proper use of project (include farm workers poisoning pesticides and simple pictorial occurring pesticide use presentations) under the hazards project - 45 - Control and Awareness of Farmers Number of RRA, Farmers supervision of proper application trained in farmers Groups and pesticide use on and disposal of application trained, Farmers farms by pesticides and and disposal Training farmers oversight of pesticides records Poisoning from Educate Pesticide hazards Farmers, farm Number of RRA, Farmers improper disposal of farmers, farm and use guide workers, local cases of Groups and pesticide containers workers and leaflet for the communities pesticide Farmers local project educated on poisoning communities on pesticide through use health hazards use of pesticide associated with containers; use of pesticide containers Number of farmers Properly Pesticide Pesticide returning RRA, Farmers dispose container disposal container empty Groups and pesticide procedures known cleaning and pesticide Farmers containers by farmers disposal being containers at properly collection implemented points; Number of farmers, resellers trained in proper cleaning of pesticide containers Impact on post Framers have Post-harvest loss Post- harvest Number of RRA, Farmers harvest losses due to adequate and reduction based losses avoided farmers Groups and pests proper storage on IPM or minimized trained in Farmers facilities techniques under IPM implementation Applied techniques pesticides for post- registered in harvest conformity storage; with IPM principles Number and condition of storage facilities in use Farmers Post-harvest loss Number of RRA, Farmers monitor reduction plan cases of post- Groups and incidence of based on IPM harvest pests Farmers post- harvest techniques in pests place Confirm status Inspection of Records of RRA, Farmers and integrity of pesticides at pesticides Groups and pesticides at farm/storage gate applied kept Farmers storage gate prior to use on by farmers prior to use random basis Abuses in pesticide Ensure status All pesticides Only approved List of RRA, Farmers - 46 - use and integrity of kept in the and registered pesticides Groups and pesticides original well pesticides used used in line Farmers purchased and labeled pesticide under project with used under containers prior to Uzbekistan project use Banned list of pesticides registered No decanting of avoided and approved pesticides under pesticides this project by Expired farmers pesticides Cases of avoided pesticides Random Integrity of found in non- inspection of pesticide original pesticides at farm guaranteed at containers gate prior to use farm gate level Inspection records for pesticides at farm gate prior to use General health and Farmers IPM techniques Compliance Number of RRA, Farmers safety of educated to with emphasis on with best farmers Groups and farmers/crops and adopt Good cultural and Pest/ pesticide trained in Farmers environmental Agricultural biological forms management IPM hazards Practices (GAP) of pest control techniques; based upon IPM techniques; and Number of do not use farmers chemical implementing pesticides IPM on their unless advised farms by Government regulations Frequency of chemical pesticides usage Provide PPEs to Health and safety Farmers and Quantities RRA, Farmers Farmers/ policy for farm accompanying and types of Groups and farm using work dependents PPEs are Farmers personal (children) easily protection protected available equipment against under the (PPE) pesticide project exposure in the fields Educate Pesticide hazards Farmers know Number of RRA, Farmers farmers/ farm and use leaflet for and use farmers Groups and workers in the the project pesticides trained in Farmers proper use of (include simple properly; pesticide use; pesticides pictorial pesticide presentations) hazards and Number of use guide farmers leaflet or having copies flyers of the produced pesticide hazard and use guide - 47 - flyers; Train farmers to Obsolete and obsolete and Relationship RRA, Farmers properly dispose unused pesticide unused between Groupsand obsolete and disposal pesticide pesticide Farmers unused arrangements disposal supply and pesticides made by farmer, arrangements usage implemented Educate farmers Pesticide use Only Relationship RRA, Farmers to obtain or farmer plan pesticides between Groups and purchase needed are pesticide Farmers quantities of purchased; supply and pesticides long term usage required at a storage of given time and pesticides by to avoid long farmers term storage of avoided pesticides Farmers trained Framer Pesticide Number of RRA, Farmers and aware of emergency accidents and pesticide Groups and emergency response plan in emergencies accidents and Farmers response to place managed emergencies pesticide under the accidents and project poisoning - 48 - Attachment 1 Potential IPM Options for Common Horticulture Species in Uzbekistan8 Horticulture Crop Pest and Disease IPM Options Apricot, Peach, Plum and Quadraspidiotus (Diaspidiotus) ï‚· Removing infested parts of plant Cherry perniciosus (San Jose scale) ï‚· Cleaning bark of infestation ï‚· Biological controls using Encarsia perniciosi ï‚· Annual sprays of oil during dormant period ï‚· Application of insecticides with oil spray during dormant period Parthenoiecanium corni ï‚· Parasitic wasps like Coccophagus, Encyrtus (European fruit scale) and Mataphycus spp. ï‚· Lady beetles and lacewing predators ï‚· Application of oil during dormant periods Sphaerolecanium prunastri ï‚· Lady beetles feed on scales (Plum scale) ï‚· Tiny parasite wasps on soft scales ï‚· Insecticide soaps and oils fairly effective against crawlers ï‚· True dormant oils applied during dormancy Pterochioroides persicae ï‚· Good sanitation, such as removing (Brown peach aphid) discarded infected plant materials ï‚· Eliminating weeds around plants as they serve as reservoirs for migrating or aat carried aphids ï‚· Physical control methods such as screens or barriers ï‚· Ladybird beetles, lacewings, flower flies and predator midgets and braconid wasps are biological agents to control aphids Hyalopterus arundinis (Mealy ï‚· Biological predators such as ladybird plum aphid) beetles (especially multicolor Asiatic variety), green and brown lacewings, syrphid flies and soldier beetles ï‚· Biological controls combined with neem oil for organically grown apricots Clasterosporium carpophilum, ï‚· Good sanitation by removing infected Stigmina carpophila and tissue, infected buds and lesioned twigs Wilssonomces carpohilus (Shot ï‚· Reasonable water management where hole disease) incidence of disease is low ï‚· Protection of buds during dormant period by a fungicide application before commencement of winter rains ï‚· Fungicide application in spring when infections are heavy Apricot, Peach and Plum Carpocarpsa (Cydia) ï‚· Remove infested host trees, props, picking pomonella (Codling moth, bins and fruit piles from orchard walnut worm) ï‚· Hand thinning to remove infested fruit ï‚· Proper pruning and spray calibration to improve spray coverage ï‚· Cultural control in conjunction with mating disruption and sprays of approved oils and 8 This list is based on knowledge of control measures used in USA and Europe and based on disease and pests found in Uzbekistan (USAID) - 49 - insecticide spray Laspeyresia (Grapholita) ï‚· Remove infected debris and fruits funebrana (Plum moth, red ï‚· Use pheromone traps during late spring and plum maggot) through summer ï‚· Use of selective insecticides such as insect growth regulators (e.g. on Bacillusthuringiensis) Apricot Rhychites auratus ssp ï‚· Sound agricultural practices, such as Ferghanensis (Apricot weevil) fertilizing at right time and right dose, soil management and irrigation ï‚· Application of sticky material on trunk of young trees to trap crawling adults in May when the first adult feeding is observed ï‚· Apply stickem or tanglefoot over a special tape or painted areas of the trunk of young trees to prevent bark damage Monilinia spp. (Spur cranker, ï‚· Removal and destruction of diseased plants Brown rot) ï‚· Provide good ventilation by pruning ï‚· Use furrow irrigation or low angle sprinklers to avoid wetting blossoms, foliage and fruit ï‚· Manuring and application of potassium ï‚· Control insects that serve as vectors and provide wounds for infection to occur Peach Taphrine (Exoascus)deformans ï‚· Prune in fall prior to application of (Peach leaf curl) fungicides ï‚· Application of copper compounds in fall after leaf fall Plum Exoascus (Taphrine) pruni ï‚· Removal of affected branches or affected (Plum pockets) trees ï‚· Fungicide sprays at leaf fall and before bud break in spring Podosphaera tridactyia ï‚· Widely space trees in open, sunny areas (Powdery mildew) ï‚· Prune overlapping branches to improve sunlight penetration and air circulation ï‚· Prune affected shoots, remove infected young fruits ï‚· Limit irrigation and avoid over fertilization ï‚· Remove roses near orchard which can be source of inoculation ï‚· Preventive fungicide spraying at end of flowering and fruit set Cherry Myzus cerasi (Black cherry ï‚· Banding tree bases with glue prevents ants aphid) that attend the aphids from climbing up trees ï‚· Limiting nitrogen fertilization and pruning twigs in spring ï‚· Application of insecticide sprays as soon as infestations occur. Insecticides applied to only 10% of leaves, shoots or fruits infested ï‚· Applying narrow range oils during dormant period Rhynchites auratus (Cherry ï‚· Sound agricultural practices such as weevil) fertilizing at right time with right doses, soil management and irrigation ï‚· Application of 3 to 4 inch band of sticky - 50 - materials on trunk of young trees Mycosphaerella ceraselia ï‚· Destroy infected twigs, blossoms and fruit aderhold (Shot whole disease ï‚· Application of protectant fungicides of sweet cherry ï‚· Apply copper based products after leaf fall Grape Eriophyes (Colomerus) vitis ï‚· Predatory mites and beetles as biological (Grape gall mite) controls ï‚· Between rows maintain resident vegetation or ground cover ï‚· Use dormant season oils and insecticides as well as sulfur applications during disease season Polychrosis (Lobesia)botrana ï‚· Use pheromone traps to detect lifecycle (Grape berry moth) onset for potential chemical control ï‚· Keep phyosanitary conditions and remove AND potential refuge of old wood or non- proficient vine stocks Clysia (Eupoecilia) ambiguella ï‚· Cultural methods like pruning, leaf (Grapevine moth)) stripping, irrigation, earthing-up, weeding and especially harvesting date Pseudococcus (planococcus) ï‚· Cleaning equipment before use as mealy maritimus (Grape mealy bugs) bugs are transported by equipment ï‚· Detecting and marking mealy bug infestations during harvest to monitor populations ï‚· Parasites and predators can keep the population down ï‚· Do not leave untreated areas in vineyard ï‚· Predators are parasite wasps and lady bird species ï‚· Tillage is helpful and spraying chlorpyrifos is helpful Aphid spp. ï‚· Good production practices ï‚· Predators like ladybird beetle adults and larvae Uncinula (Erysiphe) necator ï‚· Canopy management and row orientation to (Powdery mildew) increase direct sunlight and air flow ï‚· Prompt Fungicide treatment and early season controls and spraying through the season if inoculum is around ï‚· Basal leaf removal can improve coverage and efficacy of powdery mildew fungicides Plasmopara viticola (Downy ï‚· Effective soil drainage and reduction of mildew) sources of over-wintering inoculum ï‚· Techniques to promote air circulation and minimize surface wetness ï‚· Pruning and trellising methods to reduce canopy density ï‚· Ploughing to bury oospores in leaf litter and avoidance of irrigating soil for long periods ï‚· Preventive fungicides application before infection period with spreader/sticker agent to prevent washing off with rain ï‚· Earlier copper spray application in fields with history of the disease Glosoporium ampelophagum ï‚· Removal of primary sources of potential (Elsinose amphelina) Grape inoculum and protection of foliage during - 51 - anthracnose active growth phase ï‚· Removal of mummified fruits, clusters, tendrils and canes carrying canker ï‚· Use of nitrate of soda, lime or potash fertilizers about 3 weeks before bud burst promotes heavily vine development ï‚· Removal of diseased wood and shoots ï‚· Ploughing of vineyard in spring to turn all diseased bearing leaves and mummified fruits ï‚· Managed spraying of pesticides, with one dormant bud spray early in spring before bud burst ï‚· A combination of alternate application of effective fungicides for better management of disease Botrytis cinerea (Botrytis ï‚· Using a combination of cultural methods, bunch rot) resistant varieties and appropriate chemical control can control the disease ï‚· Canopy management and leaf removal ï‚· When disease is severe, remove basal leaves or basal lateral shoots immediately after berry set Aspegillus and Penicillium Reduction of source of mycotoxins contamination spp.(Mycotoxins) which are produced by these fungi which occur via soil contamination, injuries and warm and humid conditions, as well as during drying and storage. The following are measures to control mycotoxin contamination; ï‚· Avoid soils of too fertile regions, with high crops and tight bunches and big berries that increase risk of breaking of skin of grape ï‚· Favor grape establishment in fences in well aerated areas ï‚· Draw up plots of land with adequate plant disposition and trellising to facilitate planting operations and ensure good pest and disease control ï‚· Choose clones or biotypes within a variety that is better adapted to climatic and soil conditions in specific cultivation area ï‚· Lay out heterogeneous plots of land (Varieties, clones) to facilitate growing operations and obtain uniform ripening of grape ï‚· Excessive leaf removal to increase exposure of clusters ï‚· Avoid injuries on berries ï‚· Ensure hygiene of containers used for berry harvest or drying of grapes ï‚· Place drying grapes in one layer and avoid stacking ï‚· Favor uniform drying of all parts of grape bunch Pomegranate Euzophera punicaeella ï‚· In case of first generation, weed control to (Pomegranate moth) eliminate eggs that are laid amongst weeds - 52 - ï‚· Using Bacillus thuringiensis insecticide for second generation control ï‚· Simple traps to monitor onset of second generation Aphids ï‚· Biological control effective with parasites (Aphidiidae) and lady beetles (Coccinellidae) to control spring, lady beetles and lacewings (Chrysopidae) mid to late season. Flies (Syrphidae, Cecidomyiidae) and other predators also contribute to control ï‚· Use of fungal pathogens of Aphids ï‚· Ensuring crops are vigorous Spider mites ï‚· Adequate irrigation to reduce water stress ï‚· Avoid broad spectrum insecticides as they cause mite outbreaks ï‚· Sprays of water, insecticide oils or soaps are useful ï‚· Monitor before treatments Pseudococcus comstocki ï‚· Management by conserving their natural (Comstock mealybug) enemies and reducing ant populations and dust problems ï‚· Conservation of native beneficial predators such as Pseudaphycus malinus, Allotropa burrelli, A. convexifrons and Zarhopalus corvinus. Dialeurodes citri (White flies) ï‚· Biocontrols sre usually very effective such as Encarsia spp. and Eretmocerus spp. ï‚· Avoid nonselective insecticides for other pest and by controlling sugar-feeding ants Sphaceloma punicae ï‚· Good cultural practices and propose pre- (Pomegranate spot harvest and postharvest fruit handling anthracnose) ï‚· Prune dead limbs and twigs where fungi sporulate ï‚· Prune low limbs to at least 6o cms off the ground to reduce humidity and improve air circulation within canopies ï‚· Dispose of dead wood and old fruit away from the trees before bloom ï‚· Prune and harvest only during dry conditions to minimize fruit contamination and injury ï‚· Keep fruits dry and cool after harvest ï‚· Avoid storage temperatures below 50C to avoid chilling injuries to fruits ï‚· Cucurbits Epilachna chrysomelina ï‚· Destroy crop residues after harvest to (Water Melon (Henosepilachna elaterii) reduce over-wintering sites by tilling Sweet melon and (Melon ladybird beetle) ï‚· Collect larvae and adults in small parcels as Cucumber) they are light colored and highly visible ï‚· Use wood ash and neem extract applications Carpomya (Myiopardalis) ï‚· Larval predators of pest that are effective in pardalina (Baluchistan melon controlling the fly are Cataglophis bicolor, fly) C. megalocola and Pheidole pallidila ï‚· Some cultural practices might reduce pest - 53 - disease (C. paradalina hide in shadowy places, down the side of leaves and at base of pant in hottest part of day) such as keep fruits exposed to sunshine and wind ï‚· Keep fields open to wind and weed free ï‚· Bury fruit and fruit remains containing larvae and pupae up to depth of 1 meter and covered with lime before beginning of each following growing season Aphis gossypii (Aphids) ï‚· Beneficial insects can control aphids ï‚· Spray leaves with soapy water, and then rinse with clear water ï‚· Spraying with insecticidal soaps, planting in aluminum foil covered beds and filling yellow pans with water to trap the aphids can sometimes be effective ï‚· Remove and bury the few severely infected plants as they appear in spring ï‚· Row covers applied at planting and removal at first bloom exclude the melon aphid ï‚· Silver reflective plastic mulches applied at planting can repel aphids ï‚· Preserve habitat for beneficial predators around field and keep dust down to encourage parasitism and predation ï‚· Do not over-fertilize with nitrogen as it encourages aphid infestations ï‚· Fields infested with melon aphids should be disked or plowed under as soon as harvest is over Cucurbits Whiteflies ï‚· Natural biological controls or predators or parasitoids provide best long-term solution ï‚· Several wasps such as Encarsia and Eretmocerus genera effective in controlling whiteflies. ï‚· Whitefly nymphs preyed upon by bigeyed bugs, lacewing larvae and lady beetles. ï‚· Host-free periods, row covers, silver reflective mulches, non-infested transplants and good field sanitation are good control methods ï‚· Planting delays reduce the build up probability of whitefly populations on melons ï‚· Plant cucurbits at least one-half mile upwind from other key whitefly hosts like cotton. ï‚· Maintain good sanitation in winter/spring host plants and weeds ï‚· Remove weeds in and adjacent to crop field as well as crop residues ï‚· Proper management of irrigation and nitrogen can help Sphaerotheca fuliginea ï‚· Use plant resistant varieties (Powdery mildew) ï‚· Follow good sanitation practices (crop rotation, removal of infected plant materials - 54 - and alternative hosts, increased light intensity, and application of water sprays in greenhouse) and control weeds. ï‚· Monitor fields even those of resistant species ï‚· If multiple fungicide applications are needed to control powdery mildew, alternate materials with different modes of action Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ï‚· Use of resistant cultivars cucumerinum (Fusarium wilt of ï‚· Planting fungicide treated seeds cucumber) ï‚· Disinfecting all equipment used in cultivation and production ï‚· Destroying plants with early symptoms as well as prunings ï‚· Remove and burn crop residues after cultivation season ï‚· Raising the PH of soil to 7.5-8.2 reduces wilt ï‚· Applying fertilizers low in N and containing CaO ï‚· Chicken manureand mushroom compost reduce disease symptoms ï‚· Using fungal and bacterial antagonists might help control disease Pseudomonas syringae pv. ï‚· Use of resistant cucurbit cultivars lachrymans (Cucurbit angular ï‚· Production of seed in arid areas under leaf spot, bacterial leaf spot) furrow irrigation helps minimize pathogen population in the seed ï‚· Best if grown in fields that have no cucurbits for at least 2 years ï‚· Cultivation of soil when dry reduces bacterial survival ï‚· Control night time humidity in greenhouses ï‚· Limit use of ovearhead irrigation ï‚· Pick fruits when vines are dry to prevent spread in the field ï‚· Biological control Pentaphage (larvae of strain P. syringae pv,syringae) successfully used against P. syringaepv. Lachrymans on cucumbers in the field. Pseudoperonospora cubensis ï‚· Use of host-plant resistant, cultural (Cucumber downy mildew) practices to minimize leaf wetness and timly application of fungicides ï‚· Avoid overhead irrigation ï‚· Thin to reduce plant density and increase air movement ï‚· Time irrigation that they do not elongate dew periods ï‚· Altering plant dates to avoid periods of high disease pressure ï‚· Reduce relative humidity in green hosues and provide adequate air movement ï‚· Apply chemical treatment when disease symptoms first occur and repeat if symptoms re-appear - 55 - Colletotrichum arbiculare ï‚· Crop rotation, use of clean seed and (lagenarium) (Cucurbits inspection of transplants anthracnose) ï‚· Avoid sprinkler irrigation and keep tops of bed dry ï‚· Use fungicides (Chlorothalonil, Mancozeb) might be used on seedless watermelons or first sign of disease Cucumber mosaic virus ï‚· Silver reflective plastic might be effective against aphids that carry the virus Tomato Aculops lycopersici (Tomato ï‚· Sulfur and Avermeetin treatment when russet mite) damage symtoms begin to spread ï‚· Biological controls involving predatory phytoseid, stigmacid and tydeid mites Trialeurodes vaporariorum Same as for Cucurbits whiteflies (Tomato whiteflies) Heliaieurodes vaporariorum Treatment will begin when eggs and small leavae (Tomato fruit worm) are observed. Once inside the fruit spraying is not effective ï‚· Biocontrol with Trichogramma ssp. and other natural enemies effective in destroying eggs, so important to know the antagonistic potential within nursey or field ï‚· Deep ploughing, disking and other mechanical destruction methods, manipulation of sowing dates and use of trap crops can be used to kill pest ï‚· Host plant resistance another possible option ï‚· Sprays of Bacillus thuringiensis and Entrust formulation of spinosad used to control pest Agrotis segetum (Cutworms) ï‚· Destroy plant residuesbefore planting, especially when tomato follws good host crop like alfalfa, beans and other leguminous cover crops ï‚· Control host plant material by herbicides ï‚· Reseeding affected aresa of field rather than treating the whole field more economical ï‚· Avoid planting in fields with a known history of cutworm problems ï‚· Use shallow tillage to keep down late autumn and early spring vegetation where possible ï‚· Use cutworm bait traps and follow by rescue treatments when cutworm populations exceed economic thresholds Aphis glossypii (Aphids) Same of cucurbits aphids Frankliniella occidentalis and ï‚· Disking weeds before they flower can other species (Thrips) lessen attraction of the field to thrips ï‚· Do not disk after weeds have flowered as thrips will move to crop plantings ï‚· Monitor populations by using yellow of=r blue sticky traps from sowing to flowering ï‚· Consider treatments only if population is causing serious damage to shoot tips, flowers or fruits as unnecessary treatment can cause spider mite buildup - 56 - ï‚· Good weed management aso reduces thrip population buildup ï‚· Sprays of Entrust formulation of spinosad are used if treatment is needed Meloidogyne spp. (root knot ï‚· Provide basic phytosanitary treatment such nematodes) as cleansing plants with hot water treatment ï‚· Application of nematicides in the field and frequent rotation with cereals or other graminaceous non-host crops ï‚· Steam or fumigate glasshouse soils to eradicate pest ï‚· Try to use resistant tomato varieties and rotation with resistant varieties and non- host crops ï‚· Soil solarization Clavibacter (Corynebacterium) ï‚· Use of healthy seeds, seed treatment, michiganensis (Bacterial appropriate cultural methods, hygiene and canker) sanitation (disease primarily affects seeds) ï‚· Deep ploughing to bury infected crop residue after harvest and crop rotation away from solanaceous crops for at least 2 years ï‚· Production of tomato transplants in greenhouses planted in soilless medium in plastic trays ï‚· Chemical spray with copper containing compounds under conditions of frequent rainfall and prolonged wet periodsreduces foliar blight and fruit spotting ï‚· Strict hygiene measures such as early detection, isolation and eradication of infected plants, destruction of crop residues, rinsing hands and gloves and pruning tool disinfection after working each row and disinfection of structures and equipment Fulvia (Cladosporium) fulvum ï‚· Sanitation and seed treatment (Tomato leaf mold) ï‚· After harvest, carefully remove and burn all plant debris ï‚· Soil sterilization by solar heating by polyethylene mulching, followed by covering soil again with plastic and planting seedlings through holes in the covers ï‚· Avoid wetting of foliage when watering ï‚· Adequate plant and row spacing to avoid excessive shading ï‚· Good hygiene to emove affected foliage soon as seen and dispose of all affected plants at end of each season ï‚· Leaf mold resistant varieties, but fungus mutates readily, so this is a temporary measure ï‚· Fungicide sprays secondary to environmental control measures ï‚· Once disease has spread spray ith mancozeb ï‚· Copper fungicides can be used, but hardens - 57 - the foliage Phytophthora infestans (Late ï‚· Resistant varieties grown in late blight blight) disease areas ï‚· Remove nearby volunteer tomato, potato plants and other night shades ï‚· Fungicides (Cymoxanil, Mancozeb) are generaly needed only if the disease appears during time of year when rain likely ï‚· Disk tomato and potato fields in fall to eliminate a winter reservoir of the fungus ï‚· Use clean and certified seed ï‚· Initial protection against infection is ucial, , hence use protectant fungicide before the disease appears ï‚· Remove sources of inoculum such as piles of unmarketable tomatoes or unharvested tomatoes Verticillium spp (Verticilium ï‚· Use resistant cultivars wilt) ï‚· Sanitatio, especially washing equipment to prevent movement of infected soil ï‚· Rotation with non-susceptible crops, such as small grains and corn ï‚· Treatment of soil and seed with preparation of Trichoderma spp and green manuring Cyperus rotundus, Amaranthus ï‚· Effective weed management including crop retroflexus, Solanium nigrum, rotation, proper field preparation, sanitation Xanthium strumarium, Abutilon and proper selection of herbicides theophrastii, Hibiscus trionum, ï‚· As irrigation water can be source of weeds, Portulaca oleracea, Sorgum keep canals banks free of weeds halepense, Convolvulus ï‚· Avoid moving weed seeds into fields arvensis, Plantago major ï‚· Soil solarization can control soilborne (Weeds) diseases, nematides and weed pests ï‚· Soil cap (10cm) over the seedline at planting can reduce first flush of weeds competing with crop seedlings. ï‚· Maintain deep furrows to keep the bed tops drier, less weeds are likely to germinate ï‚· Hand weeding is efficient method of weed control Onion Agrotis segetum (Cutworm, Same as cutworms on tomatoes turnip moth) Delia antique (Onion fly or ï‚· Void planting in soils that are high in maggot) undecomposed organic matter, such as fields just coming out of pasture or very weedy situations ï‚· Avoid planting successive rotations of onion crops ï‚· If serious infestations are expected, delay planting until the soil warms up in spring ï‚· When planting use a chain drag behind the drill to cover the seed row ï‚· Predatory flies and parasitic wasps act against the onion fly ï‚· Rotation with non host crops ï‚· Removal of all harvest remains and autumn plowing is beneficial - 58 - ï‚· Use yellow sticky tape traps ï‚· Treatment for onion maggot is preventive and should be considered for fields that are high in organic matter or undecomposed matter ï‚· Insecticides used are Diazinon and Chlorphyrifos ï‚· Remove volunteer onions in spring and minimize cultivation damage to onions Thrips tabaci (Onion Thrips) ï‚· Natural predators like predaceous mites, inute pirate bugs and lacewings feed on thrips. However, these natural predators are susceptible to insecticides ï‚· Do not plant onions near grain fields as thrip numbers build up in cereals in spring ï‚· Rainfall can suppress of thrip populations, but treatment of Spinosads often necessary Aphids ï‚· Yellow sticky traps ï‚· Proper identification of aphid species is important as many aphid speciesare dispersing to wheat and alfalfa also ï‚· Several predaotors and parasitoids attack aphids on onions, but natural enemies rarely adequate to control high field populations in spring Peronospora destructor ï‚· Use disease free bulbs, sets and seeds to (Downy mildew) reduce initial disease pressure ï‚· A 3-year rotation of Allium species in fields where disease has occurred is recommended ï‚· Destroy volunteer plants in and around field ï‚· Locate onion fields where there is god air movement to promote rapid drying of foliage ï‚· Red onion cultivars are resistant to downy mildew ï‚· Well-drained, not clay, soil and weed control are good measures of control ï‚· Seed plants in rows running in direction of prevailing wind to influence humidity ï‚· Spray with Chlorothalonil, macozeb or copper based compounds at first sight of disease Cyperus rotundus, Amaranthus ï‚· Monitor fields aand keep records of weed retroflexus, Solanium nigrum, species that occur Xanthium strumarium, Abutilon ï‚· Plant onion and garlic in the most weed theophrastii, Hibiscus trionum, free fields, avoiding fields with high Portulaca oleracea, Sorgum infestations halepense, Convolvulus ï‚· Clean cultivated fields or plant a green arvensis, Plantago major, manure crop to limit weed growth Cynodon dactylon, Cuscuta Heavily infested fields plowed with campestris (Weeds) moldboard plows to bury tubers deeply ï‚· Irrigate fields before planting to geminate weed seed and after cultivate crop after killing weeds ï‚· Cultivate shallow so that weed seed is not - 59 - brought up from deeper layers ï‚· Reduce weed populations after cultivation of crop by hand weeding ï‚· Maintain deep furrows to help keep bed tops from becoming overly wet and maintaining adequate soil moisture for the crop - 60 - Attachment 2 Recommended Approach for Preparation a Pest Management Plan by Applicant for Sub- Project Loan Following review of the Environment Screening Checklist submitted by the applicant for a sub- project loan, the PFI Loan Officer and/or RRA Environmental Specialist will determine if the applicant needs to prepare a PMP. This determination would be made on the basis of toxicity of the pesticides to be used and the environmental risks posed by the activity. When, a determination is made that a PMP is to be prepared by the sub-project loan applicant, a two stage process would be applied towards the preparation of the PMP. Stage A: Additional Information Request The applicant would provide the following information: 1. Types and application of pesticides (i) What are the pesticides that are to be purchased, including name of product, type of formulation, concentrations of the active ingredient? (ii) Where are the pesticides to be purchased from, including name of store and location? (iii) What are the quantities of pesticides to be purchased and the package sizes and quantities in each package? (iv) What type of equipment is to be used to apply the pesticides (v) Are applicators trained in the proper and safe use of the pesticides? 2. Purpose and appropriateness of pesticides (i) What crops to you plan to use the pesticide? (ii) What pests and/or diseases are to be controlled by the pesticide? (iii) What non-chemical pest control measures have been used in the past to control the pests and/or diseases mentioned in (ii) above? (iv) How often is the pesticide to be applied and in what quantities in any given application? (v) How will the timing of the application of the pesticide be decided? (vi) Have you been trained or received advice on non-chemical pest control or integrated pest control (IPM)? (vii) If not trained, how do you plan to obtain assistance, advice or training in pesticide application quantities and methods; calibration of spraying equipment; use of protective gear; storage and disposal methods, etc. 3. Handling, storage and disposal of pesticides (i) How will the pesticides be transported to the project site? (ii) Where will the pesticides be stored in the farm? (iii) Will the storage location of the pesticide be secured/locked and who will have access to these stores? - 61 - (iv) How will animals, children and unauthorized persons be excluded from access to the storage areas? (v) Where will mixing of pesticides happen and what precautions will be taken to keep the storage and pesticide mixing areas away from grain stores and production areas? (vi) How will excess unused and mixed pesticide products be disposed of? (vii) How will empty pesticide containers be disposed of? (viii) How will pesticide records in terms of purchase, use and disposal be maintained? 4. Environmental Aspects (i) Are pesticide application areas near water bodies, wetlands or areas of known natural habitats? (ii) Are there know natural pollinators found in the vicinity of the application areas? If so what precautions would be used to ensure that non-target beneficial species are not harmed? Stage B: Preparation of Pest Management Plan Based on the information provided by the subproject loan applicant, the PFI Loan Officer (if necessary, in consultation with RRA Environmental Officer) will identify the risks associated with the application of the pesticide and the more important and most practical mitigation measures that need to be applied, including any complementary measures using non-chemical control measures. The PFI Loan Officer will advise the applicant on the scope and nature of the PMP to address potential impacts of the subproject activities. If needed, the PFI Loan Officer and/or RRA Environmental Specialist can advise the loan applicant on professional services that could be obtained for completion of the subproject specific PMP. Typically the outline of the PMP would be the following: (a) Purpose of Activity provides information on extent and severity of pest and diseases in the crops to be grown (b) General Informationof Area which should provide data on land use and soil, water resources, layout of facilities, etc. (c) Review of Existing Pest Management Practices and Capacity which should provide data on current practices (chemical and non-chemical) in control of the particular pests and diseases, constraints and track record and extent to which pest and diseases of fruit and agricultural crops have been managed and controlled; and reasons for enhanced pesticide applications through the proposed subproject loan. (d) Types, amounts and application of Pesticides provides information on the types, amounts and nature of the pesticides to be purchased and used and the current and proposed handling, application, storage and disposal methods for the pesticides (e) Capacity, training and knowledge of the safe application and use of pesticides provides information on existing knowledge and capacity of staff and personnel in the safe use and application of pesticides and identification of gaps in training and knowledge for improving capacity. (f) Potential risks and hazards associated with application and use of pesticides in subproject loan would provide information on the environmental and human health impacts associated with the handling, application, storage and disposal of pesticides - 62 - under the subproject loan, including potential impacts on non-target beneficial species, soil and water and natural habitats. (g) Mitigation Measures to avoid and manage potential pesticide impacts that would provide information on the following: ï‚· Mechanical and physical control, cultural and biological control measures, if any that can be used in conjunction with or without pesticide applications to suppress or reduce the severity of the target pest or disease to be controlled; ï‚· Chemicals and chemical procedures that will be used to control pests and diseases, conditions under which the chemicals will be used, including climatic conditions, vegetation conditions, timing of applications, to improve the effectiveness of the pesticide and reduce its environmental impacts as well as specific measures to be employed to protect sensitive ecosystems, aquatic systems and ground water; ï‚· Management of health and safety aspects that would define measures to ensure safe handling, transport, application, storage and disposal of pesticides so as to reduce environmental and health risks; ï‚· Measures that would be introduced for public safety and protection during pesticide applications; ï‚· Measures to track and monitor pesticide use and effectiveness in controlling desired pests; ï‚· Measures to be undertaken to create awareness, improve information flow and improve capacity of farm workers on the hazards on the unsafe use, handling and storage of pesticides and measures for reducing such risks, as well as options for integrated pest management; ï‚· Measures to be taken to obtain technical support for pest management and safe use and application of pesticides, when necessary; ï‚· Budget estimate for implementation of the PMP. The PFI Loan Officer and/or RRA Environmental Specialist would review and approve the PMP prior to the approval of the Sub-project loan. The PFI Loan Officer will monitor the implementation of the PMP. - 63 - Attachment 3 Alternatives to Pesticide Use (Biological, Mechanical and Cultural Options) When feasible, an effective IPM strategy will consider the use of alternatives to pesticides. These might include a range of biological, mechanical and physical, and cultural alternatives or approaches. It might also involve a more rational use of chemicals, when it is appropriate or as a last resort. Some possible options are listed below: ï‚· Assign crop-free (fallow) periods and rotate crops to reduce the presence of pests and weeds in the soil ecosystem; ï‚· Use pest-resistant crop varieties; ï‚· Diversify plant varieties or intercrop plants; ï‚· Choose pest-free or pest-avoidance planting dates (e.g. early planting in rainy season avoids stems borers in cereals); ï‚· Enhance/provide shade for shade-grown crops ï‚· Improve soil health; ï‚· Use an appropriate planting density; ï‚· Remove or destroy diseased plans or plant parts and pests; ï‚· Use mechanical weed control and / or thermal weeding; ï‚· Support and use beneficial organisms, such as insects, birds, mites, and microbial agents, to perform biological control of pests and install traps; ï‚· Protect natural enemies of pests by providing a favorable habitat, such as bushes for nesting sites and other original vegetation that can house pest predators and by avoiding the use of broad-spectrum pesticides; ï‚· Fertilize and irrigate appropriately: ï‚· Release or augment predators/ parasites ï‚· Use animals to graze areas and manage plant coverage; ï‚· Use mechanical controls such as manual removal, traps, barriers, light, and sound to kill, relocate, or repel pests. - 64 - Attachment 4 Good Practices in Pesticide Application, Handling and Storage, Disposal and Health and Safety 1. Best Practices in Pesticide Application.The following are examples of some important precautionary measures in the application of pesticides: ï‚· Train personnel to apply pesticides and ensure that personnel have received applicable certifications or equivalent training where such certifications are not required; ï‚· Review and follow the manufacturer’s directions on maximum recommended dosage or treatment as well as published reports on using the reduced rate of pesticide application without loss of effect, and apply the minimum effective dose; ï‚· Avoid routine “calendar-basedâ€? application, and apply pesticides only when needed and useful based on criteria such as field observations, weather data (e.g. appropriate temperature, low wind, etc.), ï‚· Avoid the use of highly hazardous pesticides, particularly by uncertified, untrained or inadequately equipped users. This includes: ï‚· Pesticides that fall under the World Health Organization Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard Classes 1a and 1b should be avoided in almost all cases, to be used only when no practical alternatives are available and where the handling and use of the products will be done in accordance with national laws by certified personnel in conjunction with health and environmental exposure monitoring; ï‚· Pesticides that fall under the World Health Organization Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard Class II should be avoided if the project host country lacks restrictions on distribution and use of these chemicals, or if they are likely to be accessible to personnel without proper training, equipment, and facilities to handle, store, apply, and dispose of these products properly; ï‚· Avoid the use of pesticides listed in Annexes A and B of the Stockholm Convention, except under the conditions noted in the convention and those subject to international bans or phase outs; ï‚· Use only pesticides that are manufactured under license and registered and approved by the appropriate authority and in accordance with the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO’s) International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides; ï‚· Use only pesticides that are labeled in accordance with international standards and norms, such as the FAO’s Revised Guidelines for Good Labeling Practice for Pesticides; ï‚· Select application technologies and practices designed to reduce unintentional drift or runoff only as indicated in an IPM program, and under controlled conditions; ï‚· Maintain and calibrate pesticide application equipment in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. Use application equipment that is registered in the country of use; ï‚· Establish untreated buffer zones or strips along water sources, rivers, streams, ponds, lakes, and ditches to help protect water resources; ï‚· Avoid use of pesticides that have been linked to localized environmental problems and threats. 2. Best Practices in Pesticide Handling and Storage.The following are some best practices in the handling and storage of pesticides: - 65 - ï‚· Store pesticides in their original packaging, in a dedicated, dry, cool, frost-free, and well aerated location that can be locked and properly identified with signs, with access limited to authorized people. No human or animal food may be stored in this location. The store room should also be designed with spill containment measures and sited in consideration of potential for contamination of soil and water resources; ï‚· Mixing and transfer of pesticides should be undertaken by trained personnel in ventilated and well lit areas, using containers designed and dedicated for this purpose; ï‚· Containers should not be used for any other purpose (e.g. drinking water). Contaminated containers should be handled as hazardous waste, and should be disposed in specially designated for hazardous wastes sites. Ideally, disposal of containers contaminated with pesticides should be done in a manner consistent with FAO guidelines and with manufacturer's directions; ï‚· Purchase and store no more pesticide than needed and rotate stock using a “first -in, first-outâ€? principle so that pesticides do not become obsolete. Additionally, the use of obsolete pesticides should be avoided under all circumstances; A management plan that includes measures for the containment, storage and ultimate destruction of all obsolete stocks should be prepared in accordance to guidelines by FAO and consistent with country commitments under the Stockholm, Rotterdam and Basel Conventions; ï‚· Store pesticides in a secure building or location, where access to non-authorized persons is controlled and secured, and in sites that are not exposed to flooding in the rainy season; ï‚· Isolate storage areas from dwellings, to avoid fire, leakage and water contamination; ï‚· Collect rinse water from equipment cleaning for reuse (such as for the dilution of identical pesticides to concentrations used for application); ï‚· Ensure that protective clothing worn during pesticide application is either cleaned or disposed of in an environmentally responsible manner; ï‚· Maintain records of pesticide use and effectiveness; ï‚· If no village storage facility is available, farmers may decide to keep pesticides on their farms for their own use. As far as possible, these chemicals should be stored in accordance to principles described above, keeping chemicals covered and dry, well ventilated, secure from children and animals, and isolated from the rest of the farm. 3. Best Practices in Pesticide Disposal.Some recommendations for disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers are as follows: ï‚· Never reuse cleaned pesticide containers or left lying about as these could be a source of pollution and potential safety hazard; ï‚· Cleaned containers should be disposed via local authority waste collection service or through a registered waste disposal contractor; ï‚· Do not burn empty, even rinsed pesticide containers on the farm or dwelling premises; ï‚· Use personal protective equipment while disposing excess pesticides; ï‚· Triple rinse empty containers after emptying the chemicals; ï‚· Store cleaned containers where they are protected from the rain until they can be recycled or disposed of properly. 4. Best Practices in Ensuring Health and Safety in Use of Pesticides.There are a number of safety precautions that should be taken when manufacturing, transport, application, storage and handling of pesticides. These include: - 66 - ï‚· Wearing recommended protective (long sleeved shirt and long pants, socks, shoes and gloves) clothing to reduce exposure or contact with the skin; ï‚· Chemical resistant footwear and gloves; ï‚· Use protective eyewear or glasses; ï‚· Use approved protective respiratory equipment; ï‚· Stay upwind during application of pesticides; ï‚· Do not expose food to pesticides; ï‚· When pouring pesticides, keep container below eye level to prevent exposure; ï‚· Wash thoroughly with soap and water before eating or drinking if you have been exposed to pesticides. - 67 - Attachment 5 Good Practices in the Storage and Application of Fertilizer in the Field 1. Good practice for fertilizer storage: The following are some key recommendations for the safe storage of fertilizers in the field: ï‚· Keep stocks of fertilizers, and soil amendment materials to the minimum required. ï‚· Ensure that the storage facility is appropriately secured. ï‚· Fertilizers and soil amendment materials are not to be stored in contact with ground surfaces. ï‚· Storage areas/facilities are to weather-proofed and able to exclude runoff from other areas. ï‚· Do not store in close proximity to heat sources such as open flames, steam pipes, radiators or other combustible materials such as flammable liquids. ï‚· Do not store with urea. ï‚· Do not contaminate fertilizers, and soil amendment materials with other foreign matter. ï‚· In case of fire flood the area with water. ï‚· If augers are used to move the material ensure that any residue(s) in the immediate area is cleaned up. ï‚· Dispose of empty bags in the appropriate manner. 2. Good practices for field usage of fertilizers: Provisions with regard to fertilizers field usage is provided as follows: ï‚· Keep fertilizer amounts to a minimum and covered to avoid unnecessary expose to open air. ï‚· Keep spreaders and air seeders that are left in the field overnight covered. ï‚· Cover spreader and air seeders between jobs. ï‚· Ensure that the drill, air seeder and/or fertilizer box is completely empty at the end of each day. If the drill, air seeder and/or fertilizer box cannot be fully emptied fill to capacity prior to storage for the night. ï‚· Do not store dry urea with dry ammonium nitrate. EMF disclosure and consultation The RRA has disseminated the draft summary EMF to the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources and other relevant ministries for their review and comments. Also, the Executive Summary of the document in Russian was posted on websites of MAWR for its access to wide public on January 17th, 2014. On February 13, 2014, the RRA organized a consultation on Draft document. After the consultation, draft EMF was revised to consider inputs from consulted parties. The final EMF was posted on the website of the Ministry of Agriculture on February 14, 2014 and submitted to the World Bank Infoshop on March 10, 2014. The details on the public consultation are provided in the Annex 10. - 68 - ANNEX 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORIES Bank Category A (Uzbekistan Law Category 1): A Category A project is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are sensitive, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area broader than the sites or facilities subject to physical works, can cause serious and irrevocable impact upon the environment or human health. The category A subprojects will be not financed under HDP. Bank Category B (Uzbekistan Law Category II and some Category III9): A Category B project has potential adverse environmental impacts on human populations or environmentally important areas - including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other natural habitats - which are less adverse than that of Category A projects. These impacts are site-specific; few if any of them are irreversible; and in most cases mitigatory measures can be designed more readily than for Category A projects. The scope of EIA for a Category B project may varyfrom project to project, but it is narrower than that of a Category A assessment. Like Category A, a Category B environmental assessment examines the projects potential negative and positive environmental impacts and recommends any measures needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental performance. Bank Category C (Uzbekistan Law some Category III and Category IV): A Category C project is likely to have minimal or no adverse environmental impacts. Beyond screening, no further EIA action is required. Category-C includes activities, the scope, location and content of which will not bring about serious impact on the environment. Bank Category FI: A Category FI project involves investment of Bank funds through afinancial intermediary (FI), in subprojects that may result in adverse environmentalimpact (also known as Category F).Sub-projects may be defined as Category A, B or C within the FI Category 10 . Category A sub-projects will not be eligible for financing under the project. Category B sub-project EIA reports, are subject to post review by the Bank. The first two category B subprojects for each PFIs will be subject to prior review and then – post review. It is important that the project management unit and the lending institution be able to identify activities for which funding is being requested and which may fall into either of the World Bank’s Category A or Category B. For the most recent information on environmental categories see Website www.worldbank.org/environment 9 Small construction and reconstruction activities 10 As indicated above, Category A sub-projects would not be eligible for financing under HDP. - 69 - Sub-projects classified as Categories A, B or C include: Category A Sub-Projects Category B Sub-Projects Category C Sub- Projects Agriculture (large scale) Agriculture (medium scale) Agriculture (small scale) - Agriculture, horticulture, - Agriculture, horticulture, - Agriculture, horticulture, vineyards and orchards vineyards and orchards vineyards and orchards (medium scale intensive (medium scale intensive (small scale <50ha) operations >500 ha)11 operations 50 -500 ha)1 - Construction of glass- - Re-cultivation of resting land - Re-cultivation of resting land houses or polytunnels (greater than 1000 hectares); (up to 1000 hectares); - Utilization of agricultural - Utilization of agricultural land - Utilization of agricultural land land (20 to 30 hectares) for (over 50 hectares) for non- (30 to 50 hectares) for non- non-agricultural purposes agricultural (commercial or agricultural commercial - Acquisition of tractors and industrial) purposes purposes other farm equipment - Utilization of virgin soils and - Agrotourism unbroken expanses for intensive agriculture Food processing industries - Construction of buildings to (small scale) store agriculture goods and - Canning industry agricultural products (processing <3000 - Construction of warehouses for tons/year of raw materials). chemical pesticides and mineral - Collection of medicinal Food processing industries (large fertilizers herbs scale) Food processing industries - Construction of a roasting - Canning industry (annually (medium scale) enterprise (sunflower etc) processing over20,000 tons of - Agro-processing factories, - Establishment of semi- output). foods, beverages, seeds, fibers finished food factories (medium scale -- >5000 (capacity <1000 tons/year) tons/year of output) - Production of non-alcoholic - Canning industry (annually beverages processing 10,000 to 20,000 tons of output). - Construction of agricultural products process buildings, facilities and enterprises 11 There is no specific requirements for EA of agricultural, horticultural or orchard and vineyard activities under the local Law, so the HDP will specify >50ha and less than 500 ha category B and <50ha as Category C. - 70 - ANNEX 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING CHECKLIST FORMSFOR ACCESS TO CREDIT COMPONENT Environmental Screening Checklist forms shall be included in the credit application forms. This is a sample document that is recommended by the team of experts for use during the preparation of credit guideline and manual under Access to Credit Component.12 Part A FORM 1 - ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING CHECKLIST (To be completed by credit applicant) 1. Sub-project name: _____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Brief Description of Sub-project: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ 2.1 Nature of the activity: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ 2.2 Cost: ________________________________________________________________________ 2.3 Physical characteristics (description of items to be financed): ________________________________________________________ 2.4 Site area (# of hectares) and location:_____________________________________________________________________ 2.5 Property ownership:____________________________________________________________ 2.6 Existence of ongoing operations? (yes/no)_________________________________________________ 2.7 Plans for Expansion?___________________________________________________________ 12 Sections 1 and 2 of Form 1 may be taken from the general application form - 71 - 2.8 New construction?______________________________________________________________ 3. Which of the following inputs would be financed? Indicate with a check below which inputs or investments would be financed. Farm Input Financed by Agriculture Enterprise Financed by Credit Credit Line Line Seed Yes/No Agro-processing Yes/No Pedigree seed Yes/No Market refurbishment or Yes/No new market structure Fertilizer and Pesticide Yes/No Agriculture equipment hire Yes/No or purchase Land preparation (tractor and Yes/No Irrigation and drip systems Yes/No machinery hire) Tractors Yes/No Other agribusiness Yes/No Other farm implements Yes/No Agrotourism, ecotourism Yes/No Small equipment Yes/No Irrigation equipment and Yes/No irrigation maintenance Primary processing equipment Yes/No 3.1 Will pesticides be either financed or used in the sub-project? If so define the level of usage and degree of training and knowledge available for the safe use, storage and handling of pesticides and potential reliance on integrated pest management below. (to be completed if pesticides are to be used or purchased under the project) Input Level of Knowledge/Impact List of pesticides needed and quantities Name _____________ Quanity_________ Name _____________ Quanity_________ Name _____________ Quanity_________ Name _____________ Quanity_________ Are farmers trained in handling pesticides Yes_______No______ Is secure location for storing pesticides available on Yes______No______ site Is protective Clothing to be used (rubber boots, coveralls, gloves, masks, eye protection) during Yes_______No________ spraying and handling Are farmer/farmer assistants familiar with first-aid Yes_____No____ procedures for pesticide poisoning Are IPM measures being currently used or proposed for control of pest/diseases Yes_____No____ 4. Will the sub-project have impacts on the environmental parameters listed below during the construction or operational phases? Indicate with a check during which phase the impacts will likely occur and whether mitigation measures are required. Environmental Component Construction Operational Mitigation Measures Phase Phase - 72 - Terrestrial environment Soil Erosion: which horticulture crops are envisaged? Is the land located on the slopes and/or on the plain areas?Will the project involve ploughing/plant cultivation on the slopes? Soil pollution: Will the project applypesticides? If yes which types and their amount? Land, habitats & ecosystems degradation: Is the area which is to be used currently a natural habitat (forest, wetland, natural grassland, etc.)? Land degradation: Will the project involve land excavation? Generation of solid wastes – what type of wastes will be generated and their approximate amount Generation of toxic wastes – what types of toxic waste will be generated (obsolete and unusable pesticides and mineral fertilizers; chemicals used in agro-processing activities; asbestos) and their approximate amount. Biodiversity and Habitats Loss: Will the project be located in vicinity of protected areas, wetlands or other sensitive areas supporting important habitats of natural fauna and flora? Will it result in modification of natural habitats Construction: Will there be disturbance to the land and natural environment Air quality Will the project provide pollutant emissions? Which types of pollutants (SOx, NOx, solid particles, dioxins, furans, etc) Aquatic environment Water Quantity: will the project involve water use? From which water source (centralized water supply system and/or from water reservoir) ? Water Quality/Pollution: Will the project contribute to surface water pollution – what will be the approximate volumes of waste water discharge? Does the project involve discharges of waste waters in water reservoirs and/or in centralized sanitation network/septic tank? Loss of Biodiversity: Will the project involve introduction of alien species (in case of horticulture projects)? Degradation of natural aquatic ecosystems – will the project involve discharges in water courses and reservoirs of solid wastes; pesticides; Socio-economic environment Social impacts – does the project involve the following: (a) occupational safety issues; (b) health hazards; (c) land acquisition; (d) loss of - 73 - the access to sources of income; and (e) disturbance of residents living near the project area. Does the project require public consultation to consider local people environmental concerns and inputs? 5. For the environmentalimpacts that were indicated above with a check, describe the mitigation measures that will be included during the construction (C) or operational (O) phase of sub-project or both (B). Simple Environmental Mitigation Plan13 Environmental impact Sub-project Phase How and where will it be Responsibility and cost (What is to be mitigated) (C, O or B) mitigated 6. A typical sub-project monitoring plan would be prepared to monitor the implementation of the EMP for the sub-project. Environmental Monitoring Plan14 Project phase What is to be How and where Frequency of Responsibility Cost monitored will it be monitoring monitored Baseline Construction Operation De-commissioning 13 A mitigation plan should identify feasible and cost-effective measures that may reduce potentially significant adverse environmental impacts to acceptable limits. The plan should include compensatory measures if mitigation measures are not feasible, cost-effective or sufficient. The EMP will (a) identify anticipated impacts; (b) describe (with technical details, each mitigation measure, including the type of impact which it relates and the conditions under which is required; (c) estimates any potential environmental impacts of these measures; and (d) provides linkage with any other mitigation plans required for the project. 14 The monitoring plan specifies the type of monitoring, with linkages to the impact assessed in the EA report and the mitigationmeasures described in the EMP, It will provide monitoring and reporting procedures, and furnish information on the progress and results of mitigation - 74 - Annex 2. Form 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING CHECKLIST15 (To be completed by PFI) 1. Sub-project name: _____________________________________________________________ 2. Environmental Category (B or C), based on sub-project application form: _____________________________________________ (For Category B sub-projects, the PFI will refer the screening to the RRA) 3. Environmental assessment required (for B sub-projects):___Yes/____No 4. What environmental issues raised by the sub-project: ______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ 5. If an environmental assessment is required, what are the specific issues to be addressed?____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ _________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 6. What is the time frame and estimated cost of conducting the environmental assessment? _____________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ 7. Date referred to RRA: _____________________________________ Environment Checklist for Existing Enterprise Screening Criteria Criteria Comments 1. Does the existing enterprise have a valid If no, either: All required licenses/permits/ approvals operating permit, licenses, approvals etc.? etc. will be obtained prior to project approval, or Project investment must provide key investments needed to obtain them. 2.Does the existing enterprise meet all Uzbek If no: Enterprise must take corrective measures to meet environmental regulations regarding air emissions, all environmental regulations prior to project approval, water discharges and solid waste management? or Project investment must provide key investments needed to meet them 3. If the existing enterprise has any significant If the enterprise has outstanding liabilities the outstanding environmental fees, fines or penalties or facility must agree to take corrective measures to any other environmental liabilities (e.g. pending remove them prior to project approval. 15 In review, the PFIs will also review and evaluate the Environment Checklist for Existing Enterprise Screening Criteria - 75 - legal proceedings involving environmental issues etc.) will the investment be used to correct this condition? 4.If there have been any complaints raised by local If yes: RRA should examine the nature of the affected groups or NGOs regarding conditions at the complaints and actions taken to address them. facility will the investment be used to remedy these If there are significant unresolved complaints, RRA complaints? should consult with WB regarding appropriate action 5.Will the project likely have significant, diverse If yes, assign “Category Aâ€? and do not fund environmental impacts that are sensitive, diverse, or unprecedented? Impacts may affect an area broader than the sites of facilities subject to physical works 6.Will the project have potential adverse impacts on If yes, assign “Category Bâ€? human populations or environmentally important areas- including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and other natural habitats-are less adverse than those of Category A. Are the impacts site specific, few if any irreversible andmitigating measures are readily developed 7.Will the project likely have minimal or no impact If yes, assign “Category Câ€? - 76 - Form 3 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING CHECKLIST (to be completed by the PFIs (in consultation with RRA Environmental Specialist) based on review of the mitigation proposed and the environmental assessment (if required). Was an Environmental Assessment needed? (Y or N) ___ If yes, was it done? ___ Was an Environmental Management Plan prepared? (Y or N) ________ Are the mitigation measures to be included in project implementation adequate and appropriate? (Y or N) ________ Will the project comply with existing pollution control standards for emissions and wastes? (Y or N) _____ If no, will an exemption be sought? _____ ______ Is an Environmental Monitoring Plan necessary? (Y or N) ___ If so, has it been prepared? (Y or N) __Approved by the PFIs? ___________ What follow-up actions are required by the proponent, the PFIs or the RRA Environmental Specialist? ______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Were public consultations held concerning potential environmental impacts of the proposed sub- project? (Y or N)_______Were minutes recorded? (Y or N)_____ Annex: minutes of consultation _____________________ ________________________________________________________ _____________________ ________________________________________________________ _____________________ ________________________________________________________ Project Officer: Date: Environmental Screener: Date: - 77 - Form 4 FIELD VISIT CHECKLIST FOR CATEGORY B SUB-PROJECTS UNDER THE ACCESS TO CREDIT COMPONENT (To be completed by PFI and/or by RRA Environmental Specialist) Project Name: Date/time of Visit: District: Visitors: Location ï‚· Obtain a site map or make a sketch ï‚· Locate site on local map or indicate area (e.g. for grazing) Current activity and site history ï‚· Who is the site contact (name, position, contact information)? ï‚· What is the area of the site to be used for project activities? ï‚· What are current uses of the site? ï‚· What were previous uses of the site (give dates if possible)? ï‚· Will the project result in displace of people displace people or have people been displaced for the purpose of the subproject? Environmental Situation ï‚· Are there sensitive sites nearby (nature reserves, cultural sites, historical landmarks)? ï‚· Is anything known about the geology/hydrology of the site? Are there water courses on the site? ï‚· What is the terrain or slope? ï‚· Does the site experience flooding, waterlogging or landslides? Are there signs of erosion? ï‚· What are the neighboring buildings ( e.g., schools, dwellings, industries) and land uses? Estimate distances. ï‚· Will the proposed site affect transportation or public utilities? Pesticide Situation ï‚· Are pesticides stored and disposed in safe manner? ï‚· Are applicators aware of, and practicing safe spraying and handling precautions ï‚· For what pests and diseases are pesticides used and have alternative pest management approaches being tried ï‚· Do applicators use proper safety precautions during spraying of pesticides ï‚· Are farmers and farm assistants trained in proper pesticide use, storage and disposal ï‚· Are there any environmental issues relating to pesticide use Licenses, Permits and Clearances ï‚· Does the site require licenses or permits to operate the type of activity proposed? Are these available for inspection? ï‚· What environmental or other (e.g., health, forestry) authorities have jurisdiction over the site? Water Quality Issues ï‚· Does the proposed activity use water for any purposes (give details and estimate quantity). What is the source? ï‚· Will the proposed activity produce any effluent? (estimate quantity and identify discharge point) ï‚· Is there a drainage system on site for surface waters or sewage? Is there a plan available of existing drainage or septic systems? ï‚· How waste water is managed (surface water courses, dry wells, septic tanks)? ï‚· If the project involves the use of an existing dam, does the dam meet World Bank safety standards - 78 - ï‚· Will the scheme lead to increased water abstraction from the rivers? Soils ï‚· What is the ground surface (agricultural land, pasture, etc.)? ï‚· Will the project damage soils during construction or operations? ï‚· Will the project affect the landscape significantly (draining wetlands, changing stream courses) Biological environment ï‚· Describe vegetation cover on the site. ï‚· Is there information about rare or threatened flora and fauna at or near the site? If yes, would the project have an impact or increase risk to the species? ï‚· Obtain a list of vertebrate fauna and common plants of the site (if available). ï‚· Note potential negative impacts on biota if project proceeds. Visual Inspection Procedures ï‚· Try to obtain a site map or make a sketch to mark details. ï‚· Take photos, if permitted. ï‚· Walk over as much of the site as possible, including boundaries, to note adjacent activities. ï‚· Note any odors, smoke or dust emissions, standing water, etc. Recommended Mitigation Measures ï‚· Confirm proposed mitigation measures or provide recommendations for satisfactory mitigation measures - 79 - ANNEX 3 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AND BEST PRACTICE FOR CATEGORY B SUB-PROJECTS UNDER THE ACCESS TO CREDIT COMPONENT Most farming, orchards, and horticulture operations have the potential to harm the environment through the use of chemicals, and due to inappropriate land and water management. Credits for medium-scale agriculture activities (>50 ha) that use fertilizers, pesticides and other farm chemicals would be Environmental Category-B, and would require mitigation and monitoring plans. Most processing facilities produce some form of pollution and need to treat their effluent, control dust and smoke, dispose of solid wastes, and limit noise pollution from the plant. They are also subject to health and safety laws, and require permits to operate. Most medium scale processing plants that are potential applicants for project funding would be Category-B. Table 3.1: Some Agricultural Good Practices – Guidelines for a Protected Environment and Sustainable Agriculture (Farm Inputs) Activity Good Practices Seed - Selection of seed with lowest agro-chemical input requirements to achieve high yields - Selection of seed with minimal level of pest and disease vulnerability. rigorous sanitation facilities and procedures for imported seed - rigorous sanitation facilities and procedures for exported seed - Extension services provide advice on appropriate fertilizer and pesticide applications. Wherever possible, extension service to promote sustainable agricultural practices including IPM, minimum tillage, contour ploughing, crop rotations, and green manure. Fertilizers - selection of best fertilizers for crop and prevailing soil conditions - application levels as per recommended by manufacturer and extension service Pesticides - PFIs and RRAwill screen applications for credits and grants to ensure that no pesticides are financed. - Training on environmental due diligence for PFI staff will include familiarization with the national pesticide registration list. - Training and advisory services on integrated pest management (IPM) and safe handling and use of agricultural chemicals will be provided to farmers and agribusiness personnel under the Rural Training and Advisory Services component - purchase of engine efficient tractors that provide highest ratio of power and work to fuel input Tractors - tractors with high efficiency emissions control - tractors no larger than necessary for the most extensive work anticipated Farm implements - implements suitable for minimal tillage Land preparation - contour ploughing, minimum tillage, grassed waterways, etc. Small equipment - energy efficient equipment - highest efficiency equipment Irrigation equipment - equipment that assists in the use of irrigation water in an efficient manner - 80 - Farm buildings for - Location of buildings where least disturbance of resources required. stock, machinery, and - energy efficient building design including heating, ventilation chemicals - building design to minimize materials and use of environmentally friendly materials Fencing materials N/A Primary processing - high efficiency equipment including low emission fuels (e.g. gas, solar) equipment Fuel, lubricants, spare - safe storage of fuels, lubricants and chemicals parts and other operating requirements Table 3.2: Some Good Practices for Rural Enterprises – Guidelines for a ProtectedEnvironment and Sustainable Rural Development (Agri-businesses) Enterprise Category Good Practices Agro-processing - not to be located in environmentally sensitive areas - effective effluent management system in place - effective disposal of solid wastes - safety features in place Other agribusiness - avoid use of sensitive water courses - avoid location on sensitive sites - effective waste disposal - safety precautions and systems during construction - control of effluents and emissions Trade (wholesale and retail) – - location of markets to take into account micro- environmental effects such rural markets as erosion and potential water contamination market operations to be guided by a printed and displayed list of good practices including waste disposal and sanitary procedures Ecotourism, agrotourism - environmentally sensitive areas not disturbed - hygiene standards to meet national requirements - energy efficient heating and cooking - safe work environment. proper disposal of wastes preventing water contamination, disease and vermin - 81 - Table 3.3: Some Good Practices for Small Scale Infrastructure and Construction Activities Activity Parameter Mitigation Measures Checklist A. General Worker Safety ï‚· The local construction and environment inspectors and communities Conditions have been notified of upcoming activities ï‚· The public has been notified of the works through appropriate notification in the media and/or at publicly accessible sites (including the site of the works) ï‚· All legally required permits have been acquired for construction and/or rehabilitation ï‚· All work will be carried out in a safe and disciplined manner designed to minimize impacts on neighboring residents and environment. ï‚· Workers will comply with international good practice (always hardhats, as needed masks and safety glasses, harnesses and safety boots) ï‚· Appropriate signposting of the sites will inform workers of key rules and regulations to follow B. General Air Quality ï‚· During interior demolition use debris-chutes above the first floor Construction ï‚· Keep demolition debris in controlled area and spray with water mist or to reduce debris dust Rebailitation ï‚· Suppress dust during pneumatic drilling/wall destruction by ongoing Activities water spraying and/or installing dust screen enclosures at site ï‚· Keep surrounding environment (side walks, roads) free of debris to minimize dust ï‚· There will be no open burning of construction / waste material at the site ï‚· There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites Noise ï‚· Construction noise will be limited to restricted times agreed to in the permit ï‚· During operations the engine covers of generators, air compressors and other powered mechanical equipment should be closed, and equipment placed as far away from residential areas as possible Water Quality ï‚· The site will establish appropriate erosion and sediment control measures such as e.g. hay bales and / or silt fences to prevent sediment from moving off site and causing excessive turbidity in nearby streams and rivers. Waste ï‚· Waste collection and disposal pathways and sites will be identified Management for all major waste types expected from demolition and construction activities. ï‚· Mineral construction and demolition wastes will be separated from general refuse, organic, liquid and chemical wastes by on-site sorting and stored in appropriate containers. ï‚· Construction waste will be collected and disposed properly by licensed collectors ï‚· The records of waste disposal will be maintained as proof for proper management as designed. ï‚· Whenever feasible the contractor will reuse and recycle appropriate and viable materials (except asbestos) - 82 - C. Individual Water Quality ï‚· The approach to handling sanitary wastes and wastewater from wastewater building sites (installation or reconstruction) must be approved by treatment the local authorities system ï‚· Before being discharged into receiving waters, effluents from individual wastewater systems must be treated in order to meet the minimal quality criteria set out by national guidelines on effluent quality and wastewater treatment ï‚· Monitoring of new wastewater systems (before/after) will be carried out D. Historic Cultural Heritage ï‚· If the building is a designated historic structure, very close to such a building(s) structure, or located in a designated historic district, notify and obtain approval/permits from local authorities and address all construction activities in line with local and national legislation ï‚· Ensure that provisions are put in place so that artifacts or other possible “chance findsâ€? encountered in excavation or construction are noted, officials contacted, and works activities delayed or modified to account for such finds. E. Acquisition Land Acquisition ï‚· If expropriation of land was not expected and is required, or if loss of land Plan/Framework of access to income of legal or illegal users of land was not expected but may occur, that the World Bank Task Team Leader is consulted. ï‚· The approved Land Acquisition Plan/Framework (if required by the project) will be implemented F. Toxic Asbestos ï‚· If asbestos is located on the project site, mark clearly as hazardous Materials management material ï‚· When possible the asbestos will be appropriately contained and sealed to minimize exposure ï‚· The asbestos prior to removal (if removal is necessary) will be treated with a wetting agent to minimize asbestos dust ï‚· Asbestos will be handled and disposed by skilled & experienced professionals ï‚· If asbestos material is be stored temporarily, the wastes should be securely enclosed inside closed containments and marked appropriately ï‚· The removed asbestos will not be reused Toxic / hazardous ï‚· Temporarily storage on site of all hazardous or toxic substances will waste be in safe containers labeled with details of composition, properties management and handling information ï‚· The containers of hazardous substances should be placed in an leak- proof container to prevent spillage and leaching ï‚· The wastes are transported by specially licensed carriers and disposed in a licensed facility. ï‚· Paints with toxic ingredients or solvents or lead-based paints will not be used G. Affects Protection ï‚· All recognized natural habitats and protected areas in the immediate forests and/or vicinity of the activity will not be damaged or exploited, all staff protected areas will be strictly prohibited from hunting, foraging, logging or other damaging activities. ï‚· For large trees in the vicinity of the activity, mark and cordon off with a fence large tress and protect root system and avoid any damage to the trees ï‚· Adjacent wetlands and streams will be protected, from construction - 83 - site run-off, with appropriate erosion and sediment control feature to include by not limited to hay bales, silt fences ï‚· There will be no unlicensed borrow pits, quarries or waste dumps in adjacent areas, especially not in protected areas. H.Traffic and Direct or indirect ï‚· In compliance with national regulations the contractor will insure Pedestrian hazards to public that the construction site is properly secured and construction Safety traffic and and related traffic regulated. This includes but is not limited to pedestrians ï‚· Signposting, warning signs, barriers and traffic diversions: site will by construction be clearly visible and the public warned of all potential hazards activity ï‚· Traffic management system and staff training, especially for site access and near-site heavy traffic. Provision of safe passages and crossings for pedestrians where construction traffic interferes. ï‚· Adjustment of working hours to local traffic patterns, e.g. avoiding major transport activities during rush hours or times of livestock movement ï‚· Active traffic management by trained and visible staff at the site, if required for safe and convenient passage for the public. ï‚· Ensuring safe and continuous access to office facilities, shops and residences during renovation activities, if the buildings stay open for the public. - 84 - ANNEX 4 ACCEPT/REJECT DECISION MAKING FOR SUB-PROJECTS UNDER THE ACCESS TO CREDIT COMPONENT It is the responsibility of the PFIto accept or reject a sub-project proposal on the grounds of environmental issues. The PFI will consult with the RRA environmental specialist in this regard. Providing that the sub-project has been adequately screened into Bank Categories B or C and that adequate EMP is proposed to mitigate significant environmental issues and adequately monitor the results of Category B projects, there should be no reason to reject a sub-project on environmental grounds. If the sub-project is rejected on environmental grounds after an unsatisfactory site visit the proponent, at the discretion of the PFI, may submit an improved environmental proposal. Re- appraisal should be restricted to one iteration, and the proponent should not expect to make multiple applications on the basis of continues marginal improvements to the scheme. Any further consideration of the sub-project should be at the discretion of the PFI. In some instances, however, there may be a number of environmental issues associated with a sub-project, and cumulatively the issues could be more serious than any one individual issue would indicate. For example, a sub-project may have several issues that individual screening would put in Category B or C. Cumulatively, however, the environmental issues may be more serious, and the sub-project may need a more stringent EMP, be screened into a higher Environmental Category or be rejected out of hand. The PFI may use a checklist to provide a score of magnitude of impacts to produce a cumulative index. The higher the index the higher the environmental risk of the sub-project. Using Table4.1 as a guide and noting that each activity requires its own individual score – the cumulative score of impacts will provide the overall score for that sub-project. Table 4.1: Guideline for screening cumulative environmental impacts Activity Risk Significance of Impacts Examples Score None There is no detectable impact of any A procurement project with no 0 kind as a result of the activity direct impacts Low Small changes, measurable, usually Market facilities: small social 1 confined to a small area, mitigation is disruption. simple or not necessary Small scale processing, small scale farming; creates minor pollution Low-moderate Measurable losses, or ecosystem Small-medium scale agro- 2 without mitigation disruption; ecosystem able to cope processing,; potential to produce without mitigation some minor pollution Moderate with Measurable losses, or ecosystem Medium scale agro-processing, , 3 mitigation disruption; Proposed EMP is adequate most category B sub-project but in the event it is not fully used, activities with potential for pollution ecosystem would be disrupted or disruption - 85 - High Substantial losses or ecosystem Large-scale physical disturbances of 5 disruption: Ecosystem would probably the site and/or surroundings; still function at a lower level. extraction, consumption, or conversion of substantial amounts of EMP inadequate or difficult/costly to forest and other natural resources; operate and maintain measurable modifications of hydrological cycles or increasing abstraction of water from the river; hazardous materials in more than incidental quantities; and involuntary displacement of people and other significant social disturbances. The sub-project may comprise many activities, and the cumulative score of the activities would indicate to the PFI the overall risk of the sub-project. - If cumulative score is 5 or less the screened Environmental Category B for individual activities is probably adequate. - If cumulative score is >5 the appraised Environmental Category may be inadequate, and additional requirements may be placed on the sub-project. The applicant may be required to: o Describe in detail the impacts likely to be experienced. o Determine practical and reasonable EMP to be followed. o Describe EMP measures to be taken, and good practices to be followed, to address impacts o Prepare a monitoring schedule The PFI will be required to: o Discuss with RRA or Government environmental agency for input and support o Ensure EMP is incorporated into sub-loan agreement. The RRA will be required to: o Supervise EMP implementation. o Monitor activity on a regular basis. - 86 - ANNEX 5 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION FOR CATEGORY B MID-SIZE CREDITS UNDER THE ACCESS TO CREDIT COMPONENT Consultation is essential in any circumstances where the sub-project will affect local communities or individuals that are not directly part of the sub-project. The physical and social environment must not be changed to the detriment of local residents, and any changes must be with their agreement. Consultation will involve public participation of affected community members and NGOs. The sub-borrower must: - Provide compensation to the community (replacement of public amenities etc); - Fully consider cumulative impacts; - Deal with political and social problems associated with development; - Offer further consultation and participation with affected communities. In the event of public consultation, minutes are to be recorded of the discussions and records maintained of any public objections to the sub-project, together with the mitigating measures proposed by the sub-project proponent. The sub-borrower must provide the PFI with a report (where appropriate) describing the consultation with residents and of their support or rejection of the development plans. - 87 - ANNEX 6 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT An environmental assessment report for a Category B project focuses on the significant environmental issues raised by a Sub-project. Its primary purpose is to identify those measures that, if incorporated into the design and implementation of a project can assure that the negative environmental effects will be minimized. The scope and level of detail required in the analysis depend on the magnitude and severity of potential impacts. The environmental assessment report should include the following elements: (a) Executive Summary. This summarizes the significant findings and recommended actions. (b) Policy, legal and administrative framework. This section summarizes the legal and regulatory framework that applies to environmental management in the jurisdiction where the study is done. (c) Project Description. Describes the nature and scope of the project and the geographic, ecological, temporal and socioeconomic context in which the project will be carried out. The description should identify social groups that will be effected, include a map of the project site, and identify any off-site or support facilities that will be required for the project. (d) Baseline data. Describe relevant physical, biological and social condition including any significant changes anticipated before the project begins. Data should be relevant to project design, location, operation or mitigation measures. (e) Environmental impacts. Describe the likely or expected positive and negative impacts in quantitative terms to the extent possible. Identify mitigation measures and estimate residual impacts after mitigation. Describe the limits of available data and uncertainties related to the estimation of impacts and the results of proposed mitigation. (f) Analysis of Alternatives. Systematically compare feasible alternatives to the proposed project location, design and operation including the "without project" alternative in terms of their relative impacts, costs and suitability to local conditions. For each of the alternatives quantify and compare the environmental impacts and costs relative to the proposed plan. (g) Environmental Management Plan (EMP). If significant impacts requiring mitigation are identified, the EMP defines the mitigation that will be done, identifies key monitoring indicators and any needs for institutional strengthening for effective mitigation and monitoring to be carried out. (h) Appendices. These should include: (i) The list of EA preparers; (ii) References used in study preparation; (iii) A chronological record of interagency meetings and consultations with NGOs and effected constituents; (iv) Tables reporting relevant data discussed in the main text, and; (v) A list of associated reports such as resettlement plans or social assessments that were prepared for the project. In addition, the Terms of reference should specify the composition and qualifications of the study team, the duration of the studies, the scope and nature of any primary data collection and - 88 - field visits that will be required, and include a schedule of reporting and the nature and constituencies for consultations with stakeholders that are to be carried out. - 89 - ANNEX 7 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN CHECKLIST (for small scale construction and rconstruction activities) PART 1: STITUTIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE Country Project title Scope of project and activity Institutional WB Project Management Local Counterpart and/or Recipient arrangements (Project Team Leader) (Name and contacts) Implementation Safeguard Supervision Local Counterpart Local Inspectorate Contactor Supervision Supervision arrangements (Name and contacts) SITE DESCRIPTION Name of site Describe site location Attachment 1: Site Map [ ]Y [ ] N Who owns the land? Description of geographic, physical, biological, geological, hydrographic and socio-economic context Locations and distance for material sourcing, especially aggregates, water, stones? LEGISLATION Identify national & local legislation & permits that apply to project activity PUBLIC CONSULTATION Identify when / where the public consultation process took place INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITYBUILDING Will there be any [ ] N or [ ]Y if Yes, Attachment 2 includes the capacity building program capacity building? - 90 - PART 2: ENVIRONMENTAL /SOCIAL SCREENING Activity Status Triggered Actions A. Building rehabilitation [] Yes [ ] No See Section A below B. Minor new construction [ ] Yes [] No See Section A below Will the site C. Individual wastewater treatment system [ ] Yes [] No See Section B below activity D. Historic building(s) and districts [ ] Yes [] No ?? See Section C below include/involve 16 any of the E. Acquisition of land [ ] Yes [] No See Section D below following?? F. Hazardous or toxic materials 17 [] Yes [ ] No See Section E below G. Impacts on forests and/or protected areas [ ] Yes [] No See Section F below H. Handling / management of medical waste [ ] Yes [] No See Section G below I. Traffic and Pedestrian Safety [] Yes [ ] No See Section H below 16 Land acquisitions includes displacement of people, change of livelihood encroachment on private property this is to land that is purchased/transferred and affects people who are living and/or squatters and/or operate a business (kiosks) on land that is being acquired. 17 Toxic / hazardous material includes but is not limited to asbestos, toxic paints, noxious solvents, removal of lead paint, etc. - 91 - PART 3: ACTIVITY PARAMETER MITIGATION MEASURES CHECKLIST 0. General Conditions Notification and Worker (a) The local construction and environment inspectorates and communities have been notified of upcoming activities Safety (b) The public has been notified of the works through appropriate notification in the media and/or at publicly accessible sites (including the site of the works) (c) All legally required permits have been acquired for construction and/or rehabilitation (d) The Contractor formally agrees that all work will be carried out in a safe and disciplined manner designed to minimize impacts on neighboring residents and environment. (e) Workers’ PPE will comply with international good practice (always hardhats, as needed masks and safety glasses, harnesses and safety boots) (f) Appropriate signposting of the sites will inform workers of key rules and regulations to follow. A. General Rehabilitation Air Quality (a) During interior demolition debris-chutes shall be used above the first floor and /or Construction (b) Demolition debris shall be kept in controlled area and sprayed with water mist to reduce debris dust Activities (c) During pneumatic drilling/wall destruction dust shall be suppressed by ongoing water spraying and/or installing dust screen enclosures at site (d) The surrounding environment (side walks, roads) shall be kept free of debris to minimize dust (e) There will be no open burning of construction / waste material at the site (f) There will be no excessive idling of construction vehicles at sites Noise (a) Construction noise will be limited to restricted times agreed to in the permit (b) During operations the engine covers of generators, air compressors and other powered mechanical equipment shall be closed, and equipment placed as far away from residential areas as possible Water Quality (a) The site will establish appropriate erosion and sediment control measures such as e.g. hay bales and / or silt fences to prevent sediment from moving off site and causing excessive turbidity in nearby streams and rivers. Waste management (a) Waste collection and disposal pathways and sites will be identified for all major waste types expected from demolition and construction activities. (b) Mineral construction and demolition wastes will be separated from general refuse, organic, liquid and chemical wastes by on-site sorting and stored in appropriate containers. (c) Construction waste will be collected and disposed properly by licensed collectors (d) The records of waste disposal will be maintained as proof for proper management as designed. (e) Whenever feasible the contractor will reuse and recycle appropriate and viable materials (except asbestos) B. Individual wastewater Water Quality (a) The approach to handling sanitary wastes and wastewater from building sites (installation or reconstruction) treatment system must be approved by the local authorities (b) Before being discharged into receiving waters, effluents from individual wastewater systems must be treated in order to meet the minimal quality criteria set out by national guidelines on effluent quality and wastewater treatment (c) Monitoring of new wastewater systems (before/after) will be carried out (d) Construction vehicles and machinery will be washed only in designated areas where runoff will not pollute natural surface water bodies. C. Historic building(s) Cultural Heritage (a) If the building is a designated historic structure, very close to such a structure, or located in a designated historic district, notification shall be made and approvals/permits be obtained from local authorities and all construction activities planned and carried out in line with local and national legislation. (b) It shall be ensured that provisions are put in place so that artifacts or other possible “chance findsâ€? encountered in excavation or construction are noted and registered, responsible officials contacted, and works activities delayed or modified to account for such finds. - 92 - ACTIVITY PARAMETER MITIGATION MEASURES CHECKLIST D. Acquisition of land Land Acquisition (a) If expropriation of land was not expected but is required, or if loss of access to income of legal or illegal users of Plan/Framework land was not expected but may occur, that the Bank’s Task Team Leader shall be immediately consulted. (b) The approved Land Acquisition Plan/Framework (if required by the project) will be implemented E. Toxic Materials Asbestos management (a) If asbestos is located on the project site, it shall be marked clearly as hazardous material (b) When possible the asbestos will be appropriately contained and sealed to minimize exposure (c) The asbestos prior to removal (if removal is necessary) will be treated with a wetting agent to minimize asbestos dust (d) Asbestos will be handled and disposed by skilled & experienced professionals (e) If asbestos material is be stored temporarily, the wastes should be securely enclosed inside closed containments and marked appropriately. Security measures will be taken against unauthorized removal from the site. (f) The removed asbestos will not be reused Toxic / hazardous waste (a) Temporarily storage on site of all hazardous or toxic substances will be in safe containers labeled with details of management composition, properties and handling information (b) The containers of hazardous substances shall be placed in an leak-proof container to prevent spillage and leaching (c) The wastes shall be transported by specially licensed carriers and disposed in a licensed facility. (d) Paints with toxic ingredients or solvents or lead-based paints will not be used F. Affected forests, Protection (a) All recognized natural habitats, wetlands and protected areas in the immediate vicinity of the activity will not be wetlands and/or protected damaged or exploited, all staff will be strictly prohibited from hunting, foraging, logging or other damaging areas activities. (b) A survey and an inventory shall be made of large trees in the vicinity of the construction activity, large trees shall be marked and cordoned off with fencing, their root system protected, and any damage to the trees avoided (c) Adjacent wetlands and streams shall be protected from construction site run-off with appropriate erosion and sediment control feature to include by not limited to hay bales and silt fences (d) There will be no unlicensed borrow pits, quarries or waste dumps in adjacent areas, especially not in protected areas. G. Disposal of medical Infrastructure for medical (a) In compliance with national regulations the contractor will insure that newly constructed and/or rehabilitated waste waste management health care facilities include sufficient infrastructure for medical waste handling and disposal; this includes and not limited to:  Special facilities for segregated healthcare waste (including soiled instruments “sharpsâ€?, and human tissue or fluids) from other waste disposal; and  Appropriate storage facilities for medical waste are in place; and  If the activity includes facility-based treatment, appropriate disposal options are in place and operational H Traffic and Pedestrian Direct or indirect hazards (b) In compliance with national regulations the contractor will insure that the construction site is properly secured Safety to public traffic and and construction related traffic regulated. This includes but is not limited to pedestrians by  Signposting, warning signs, barriers and traffic diversions: site will be clearly visible and the public warned construction of all potential hazards  Traffic management system and staff training, especially for site access and near-site heavy traffic. activities Provision of safe passages and crossings for pedestrians where construction traffic interferes.  Adjustment of working hours to local traffic patterns, e.g. avoiding major transport activities during rush hours or times of livestock movement  Active traffic management by trained and visible staff at the site, if required for safe and convenient passage for the public.  Ensuring safe and continuous access to office facilities, shops and residences during renovation activities, if the buildings stay open for the public. - 93 - PART 4: When Why What Where How Cost Who Phase (Define the (Is the parameter (Is the parameter (Is the parameter (Is the parameter (if not included (Is responsible frequency / or being to be monitored?) to be monitored?) to be monitored?) in project budget) for monitoring?) continuous?) monitored?) During activity preparation During activity implementation During activity supervision - 94 - ANNEX 8 Terms of Reference RRA Environmental Specialist A) Responsibilities The Environmental Specialist (ES) will be responsible for environmental monitoring of the Project interventions and its impacts. The ES will be in charge of overall coordination and reporting on the EMP, inspection of environmental compliance at worksites, advising project participants on environmental questions, coordination the overall environmental monitoring at project level, and coordination of the agricultural extension programme. The specialist will be responsible for periodically collecting information on changes and impact of the project activities. ES needs to study the environmental condition of the project area and identify main environmental parameters. Following to this, responsible for environmental monitoring of the Project interventions and its impacts. The ES will be in charge of overall coordination and reporting on the EMP, inspection of environmental compliance at worksites, advising project participants on environmental questions, coordination the overall environmental monitoring at project level, and coordination of the agricultural extension programme. ES needs to set monitoring indicators for the periodical study of environmental impacts of the project activities. Project related study documents, including EMF, and others will be the main frame works for the specialist to operate. ES will ensure that the information gathered is provided to the Project Manager and relevant component coordinators so that they will be able to properly assess project implementation and make suitable adjustments to implementation plans (should that be necessary). This information and the findings from it are a powerful management tool to be used on a continual basis during implementation and therefore it is important that the Environmental specialist receives suitable and continuous support from the HDP management. Detailed responsibilities of the Environmental specialist in relation to HDP are listed below (but not limited to this list): Gathering and analyzing information related to environmental issues in the project area; Guiding the project staffs in the areas of sub-projects requirements and provide them required information regarding environmental policies and standards; Reviewing environmental standards of each-sub-projects with the aim to identify appliance of the project classification in respect with the directives; Monthly provide report to the Project Manager on project progress and effectiveness of the taken measures and environmental parameters, identified for each sub-projects for the duration of the project and recommendation on the mitigation measures; Guiding the staff of RRA and providing assistance in preparation of the loan project, bidding documents for the compliance to the environmental standards with identifying the weak aspects, related to the specifications and/or the type of goods/work; - 95 - Periodically organize study programs for development and enhancing the professional skills of the personnel‟ s involved in the project in the environmental related issues; Act as the communication point between the national and international authorities and organizations involved in the Environment and Nature Protection; Conduct an annual assessment of subproject cumulative impacts; Actively particpate in IDA supervision missions. B) Reporting The ES will report directly to the RRA/MAWR. The ES will be responsible to implement the monitoring plan. ES will prepare and submit concise quarterly reports to the attention of the RRA on the most important issues related to the EMP. The format of the report will be prepared by the ES and approved by the RRA/MAWR. C) Qualifications and Experience The Environmental Specialist should have: i) A university degree in the area of ecology, environment and nature protection, industrial engineering and/or similar. ii) At least 3 years experience of working in the area of monitoring, environment and nature protection and/or similar. iii) Broad experience in monitoring environmental impacts, national environmental standards and requirements for nature, human health and general safeguard policies and standards. iv) Understanding of international environmental standards, including World Bank‟ s safeguard policies and requirements. v) Experience in interacting with GOU, international agencies, national and local administrations. vi) Good written and communication skills. Knowledge of English is preferable. - 96 - ANNEX 9 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR EMF AND PMP IMPLEMENTATION Activity Budget (USD) Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Total A. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT 1.Capacity Building a. Orientation workshops for 7,000 7,000 14,000 PFI and RRA staff b. Sub-borrowers training 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 c. PFI loan officers training 6,000 6,000 12,000 d. Study visits (i) International practice 7,500 7,500 15,000 (ii) Local farm visits 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 12,000 2. Public Awareness a. Awareness materials 10,000 5,000 5,000 20,000 b. Provincial Farmer 12,000 16,000 28,000 awareness workshops c. Public awareness media 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 program 3. Annual Environmental 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 Monitoring and Assessment 4.Independant Review 10,000 10,000 20,000 Sub-Total (USD) Environment management 196,000 B. PEST MANAGEMENT 1.Capacity Building a. Orientation workshops for 7000 7,000 14,000 PFI and RRA staff b. Sub-borrower/beneficaries 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 training c. Study visits 15,000 15,000 30,000 2.Awareness Support/Advisory Services a. IPM problem diagnosis 5,000 5,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 5,000 36,000 b. Field guides/IPM materials 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 c. Public awareness/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 sensitization d. IPM Demonstration 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 35,000 e. International IPM expertise 40,000 40,000 support 3. Environment Management(safe pesticide management) a. Farmer training on safe 8,000 12,000 8,000 28,000 use, handling and storage - 97 - and disposal of pesticides b. Publication/materials 5,000 7,000 3,500 3,500 7,000 26,000 c. Farmer awareness 4,000 12,000 8,000 4,000 28,000 programs 4. Independent Review 10,000 10,000 20,000 Sub-Total B (USD) Pest Management 322,000 TOTAL (A + B) USD 518,000 - 98 - ANNEX 10 UZBEKISTAN – HORTICULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDERS MEETING ON DRAFT EMF February 13, 2014 As a part of World Bank Safeguard Policies procedures consultation with project stakeholders was held on February 13, 2014 with representatives of the State Government organizations, commercial organizations and NGO’s in the field of environment and pest management as well as with representatives of local commercial banks in the Rural Restructuring Agency office in Tashkent (Uzbekistan). Shakhobiddin Karimov, Head of division of the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources of the Republic of Uzbekistan, opened the meeting and informed the participants with RRA’s current activities in the framework of the World Bank and IFAD financed projects. Then Bakhtiyor Kamalov, Deputy Director General of RRA, introduced the Horticulture Development Project (HDP). After that Gayrat Arifdjanov, Environmental Specialist of RRA, made presentation of EMF, including the environmental aspects of the HDP. A lively discussion followed on many aspects of the project; namely achievements of RESP-II, monitoring system to be used for the HDP particularly for the component of Access to Credit, screening mechanism for checking sub-loans and implementation arrangements, etc. There were no significant comments received on the EMF as the project falls under Category “Bâ€?. The major environmental impact that is expected from Access to Credit component activates is not expected to be high. Below is the summary of stakeholders meeting and discussion on EMF: Screening sub-loans: It is expected that Access to Credit Component of the project will not have significant environmental impact to the environment. It was recommended by project preparation team to introduce screening mechanism to avoid any potential risks that could arise from financing various rural and farming activities. During the consultation, screening mechanism was discussed with the participants, where representativesof local commercial banks raised the matter that, proposed screening checklists might not be adequately completed due to its complexity for farmers. It was recommended to simplify the checklists. Coordinator for REFC informed that it is a local requirement for borrower to have project approved by State Committee for Nature Protection of RUz, should the project fall into the certain category indicated in the resolution of Cabinet of Ministers of RUz#491 dated 31.12.2001. For example, it is not a requirement for borrower to have environmental assessment undertaken neither screen the loan application should the borrower consider purchasing tractor or similar equipment. Hence, screening mechanism should be simplified but not completely eliminated. Representatives of commercial banks (“Halq Bankâ€? and “Ipak Yoli Bankâ€?) raised the issue of conducting more training for the loan officers and increase the environmental awareness activities through the project. Taking into consideration that the project is planning to finance use - 99 - of pesticides, more awareness activities could be undertaken, such as training certain people that directly involve in supporting farmers in safe use and/or application of the chemicals and pesticides in the farm fields. Such organizations could be advisory centers, WUA, board of farmers and etc. Special attention could be given to support district or oblast representatives of Plant Protection Center of RUz who are partially commercialized organization but having low capacity to handle large group of emerged independent farmers. As a guideline for safe disposal of pesticides representative of State Committee for Nature Protection of RUz suggested using “Regulation on the disposal procedure of pesticides and other toxic substances, as well as the protection and maintenance of special polygonsâ€? (registered by the Ministry of Justice, #2438 dated 20.03.2013). Finally, representative of State Committee for Nature Protection of Republic of Uzbekistan stressed that, any construction and or rehabilitation works that is planned under Access to Credit component must obtain approval from the Committee prior to start of any civil works. It could be even in the form of framework analysis, but needs to comply with the structure and requirements of the local regulations. - 100 - LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AT THE EMF CONSULTATION MEETING # Organization Position Name Deputy head of 1. State Committee for Nature Protection Shakirov N. department 2. Centre of Hydrometeorology Head of laboratory Ishmukhamedova N. The Farmer's Council of the Republic 3. Chief officer Mukhtarov U. of Uzbekistan The State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Land Resources, 4. Head of laboratory Karimberdieva A. Geodesy, Cartography and State Cadaster 5. “Uzglavgoskarantinâ€? Inspection Chief officer Podarov V. State Commission on Chemicals and 6. Chief officer Karimova H. Plant Protection “Goskhimkomissiyaâ€? Research Institute of Horticulture and 7. Chief officer Shreder E. Viticulture Research Institute of Horticulture and 8. Chief officer Ishanhodjaeva L. Viticulture Research Institute of Vegetable, Potato 9. Scientific Secretary Niyazov M. and Gourds 10. Research Institute of Plant Protection Head of laboratory Pulatov Z. associate professor of 11. Tashkent Agrarian University Fayziev J. horticulture depatmnet Environmental Publishing Company 12. Journalist Ablakimova E. «Chinor ENK» 13. “Ecoservisâ€? scientific-consulting center Director Razakov R. 14. “Agroilmâ€? Magazine Journalist Mirzaev H. 15. Info Centre “Sreda obitaniyaâ€? (Habitat) Head of department Shulepina N. 16. MAWR Head of division Karimov Sh. 17. RRA Deputy Director General Kamalov B. 18. RRA Coordinator for REFC Khasanov Kh. 19. RRA Environmental Specialist Arifdjanov G. JS Commercial Bank “Qishloq Qurilish 20. Senior specialist Bogdanova I. Bankâ€? JS Commercial Bank “Qishloq Qurilish 21. Senior specialist Ametova A. Bankâ€? 22. JS Commercial Bank “Xalq Bankâ€? Head of department Rakhmonov J. 23. JS Commercial Bank “Ipak Yoliâ€? Head of department Azizov R. Deputy Head of Turaev B. 24. JS Commercial Bank “Turonbankâ€? department - 101 - ANNEX 11 List of pesticides registered in Uzbekistan Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Insecticides and Acaridaecides Cotton, mulberry, vine, 1 Avaunt 15% s.k. Dupon - USA Indoksakarb 31.12.2014 tomato, apple 2 Alexandr 15% s.k Paridjat Adjensis - India Indoksakarb Cotton, tomato 31.12.2014 Vaulent k.s. 150 Astra industrial complex 3 Indoksakarb Cotton, safflower 31.12.2015 g/l – Saudi Arabia Dalston Associated SA - Cotton, mulberry, vine, 4 Dalinka 15% s.k. Indoksakarb 31.12.2013 Panama tomato, apple Sumitomo Chemical - Cotton, cucumber, tomato, 5 Admiral 10% k.e. Pyriproxyfen 31.12.2014 Japan apple Bayer Environmental 6 Adonis 4% k.e. Fipronil Potatoes, pasture, mulberry 31.12.2013 Science SAS - France Euro Team Ltd JV – 7 Vigor 4% k.e. Fipronil Pasture, mulberry 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan - Germany Dalpronil Super Dalston Associated SA - 8 Fipronil Potatoes, mulberry, cotton 31.12.2013 20% k.s. Panama Agro Best Group - 9 Derbent 20% k.s. Fipronil Potatoes, mulberry,pasture 31.12.2013 Turkey Moer Chemscience 10 Lokstin 4% k.e. Fipronil Pasture, mulberry 31.12.2013 Co.Ltd. - China Agrokim Ltd - 11 Maksimus 4% k.e. Fipronil Pasture 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan BASF Agro BV - 12 Regent 20% k.s. Fipronil Potatoes, mulberry, cotton 31.12.2016 Switzerland 13 Applaud 25% s.p. Nihon Nohiaku - Japan Buprofezin Cucumber, tomato, cotton 31.12.2014 Applovud 25% Regal Globe Service Ltd - 14 Buprofezin Tomato 31.12.2014 s.p. Uzbekistan Euro Team Ltd JV – 15 Safflaud 40% s.k. Buprofezin Cucumber, tomato 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan - Germany Agrokim Ltd - Cotton, wheat, vine, apple, 16 Atilla 5% k.e. (R) Lambda cyhalothrin 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan mulberry, pasture Atilla Super 10% Agrokim Ltd - Cotton, wheat, vine, apple, 17 Lambda cyhalothrin 31.12.2016 k.e. (R) Uzbekistan mulberry, potatoes, pasture Close joint-stock Breik ME 100 g/l 18 company "Avgust", Lambda cyhalothrin Cotton, wheat, apple, pasture 31.12.2017 (R) Russia Gunsyao Super Nanjing Essence Fine- 19 Lambda cyhalothrin Cotton, wheat, apple, pasture 31.12.2017 20% k.e. (R) Chemical - China Ifoda Agro Kimyo Cotton, vine, mulberry, 20 Dalate 5% k.e. (R) Lambda cyhalothrin 31.12.2014 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan pasture Apple, cotton, vine, potatoes, 21 Karate 5% k.e.(R) Singenta - Switzerland Lambda cyhalothrin wheat, lucerne, corn, soy, 31.12.2017 pasture, mulberкy Cotton,potatoes, wheat, Karate Zeon 5% 22 Singenta - Switzerland Lambda cyhalothrin lucerne, corn, mulberry, 31.12.2016 k.e. ( R) pasture, vine 102 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Karache 10% k.e. Himreaktiv-Snab Ltd - 23 Lambda cyhalothrin Cotton, wheat, apple, pasture 31.12.2015 (R) Uzbekistan Agrokim Ltd - 24 Bagira 20% k.e. ImidaÑ?loprid Cotton, mulberry, pasture 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Cotton, mulberry, pasture, Agrokim Ltd - 25 Bagira 20% r.k. ImidaÑ?loprid tobacco, potatoes, wheat, 31.12.2017 Uzbekistan apple Dacloprid 20% Moer Chemscience Cotton, wheat, potatoes, 26 ImidaÑ?loprid 31.12.2015 r.k. Co.Ltd. - China pasture Dalprid 200 g/l Dalston Associated SA - 27 ImidaÑ?loprid Cotton, wheat, pasture 31.12.2016 v.k. Panama Close joint-stock Imidor 200 g/l 28 company "Shelkovo ImidaÑ?loprid Cotton, mulberrry, pasture 31.12.2014 v.r.k. Agrokhim", Russia Imiprid 200 SL Astra industrial complex 29 ImidaÑ?loprid Cotton, potatoes 31.12.2015 20% v.k. – Saudi Arabia Cotton, tomato, potato, Konfidor 200 Bayer CropScience– 30 ImidaÑ?loprid tobacco, pasture, apple, sugar- 31.12.2017 g/lv.r.k Germany beet Cotton, tomato, potato, 31 Koginor 20% k.e. Makteshim Agan - Israel ImidaÑ?loprid tobacco, pasture, apple, sugar- 21.12.2015 beet Komprador 35% Euro Team Ltd JV – 32 ImidaÑ?loprid Cotton, tomato, potatoes 21.12.2013 k.s. Uzbekistan - Germany Pilar Agree Saens Corp. - Cotton, apple, potato,tomato, 33 Pilarking 20% k.e. ImidaÑ?loprid 31.12.2016 Canada tobacco, pasture Close joint-stock Tanrek 200 g/l 34 company "Avgust", ImidaÑ?loprid Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2014 v.p.k Russia Ifoda Agro Kimyo 35 Etolucho 20% k.e. ImidaÑ?loprid Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2016 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan Himreaktiv-Snab Ltd - imidacloprid + 36 Imitrin 20% k.e. Cotton, apple, wheat, pasture 31.12.2017 Uzbekistan bifenthrin Close joint-stock imidacloprid + Cotton, apple, wheat, 37 Borey 20% k.s. company "Avgust", 31.12.2015 lambda-cyhalothrin mulberry Russia Perfecto 17,5% Euro Team Ltd JV – imidacloprid + Cotton, apple, tobacco, 38 31.12.2015 k.s. Uzbekistan - Germany lambda-cyhalothrin pasture Cotton, wheat, potato, aubergine, mulberry, tomato, Benzofosfat 30% JV Сlose JSC cabbage, Cruciferae's culture, s.p. (R), 39 Elektrokhimzavod - Phosalone sugar-beet, apple, pear, plum, 31.12.2013 Benzofosfat 30% Uzbekistan cherry-tree, citrus, barley, k.e. ( R ) lucerne, tobacco, rose, cloves, carnation Cotton, potato, aubergine, tomato, cabbage, Cruciferae's culture, sugar-beet, apple, 40 Zolon 35% k.e.(R) Keminova A/S - Denmark Phosalone 31.12.2014 pear, plum, cherry-tree, vine, citrus, wheat, barley, lucerne, tobaco, rose, carnation Bee-58 new 40% Corn, wheat, barley, rye, oats, 41 BASF - Germany Dimethoate 31.12.2014 k.e., leguminous plants, apple, 103 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date pear, plum, vine, citrus, sugar- beet, mangel-wurzel, beet, vegetable's culture, potato. Tobaco, makhorka, kenaf, lucerne Corn, wheat, barley, rye, oats, leguminous plants, apple, pear, plum, vine, citrus, sugar- 42 Nugor 40% k.e. Cerexagri - Turkey Dimethoate beet, mangel-wurzel, beet, 31.12.2014 vegetable's culture, potato. Tobaco, makhorka, kenaf, lucerne Dalmetoat 40% Dalston Associated SA - 43 Dimethoate Cotton 31.12.2016 k.e. Panama Cotton,wheat, barley, rye, oats, leguminous plants, apple, [ear, plum, vine, citrus, 44 Danadim 40% k.e. Keminova A/S - Denmark Dimethoate sugar-beet, mangel-wurzel, 31.12.2014 beet, vegetable plants. Potato, lucerna, tobaco, makhorka, kenaf, mulberry 45 Zipper 40% k.e. Agri Science - Turkey Dimethoate wheat 31.12.2016 46 Vanteks 6% s.k. Keminova A/S - Denmark Gamma-cyhalothrin Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2017 Euro Team Ltd JV – 47 Abalon 1,8% k.e. Abamectin Cotton 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan - Germany Abamek 18 ЕS, Astra industrial complex 48 1,8% k.e. Abamectin Cotton 31.12.2015 – Saudi Arabia Akarinsekt 1,8% Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - 49 Abamectin Cotton, tomato, cucumber 31.12.2017 k.e. Uzbekistan Algamek 1,8% Agro Best Group - 50 Abamectin Cotton, tomato 31.12.2013 k.e. Turkey Agrokim Ltd - 51 Altin 1,8% k.e. Abamectin Cotton, tomato 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Vertimek 1,8% 52 Singenta - Switzerland Abamectin Cotton, tomato, carnation, 31.12.2013 k.e. Golmektin 1,8% Golsam Gurgon - 53 Abamectin Cotton, tomato 31.12.2017 k.e Iran Dalemektin1,8% Dalston Associated SA - 54 Abamectin Cotton, tomato, carnation, 31.12.2017 k.e Panama Pilarmektin 1,8% Pilar Agree Saens Corp. - 55 Abamectin Cotton, tomato, rose, vine 31.12.2016 k.e.(R) Canada 56 Errou 1,8% k.e. Cerexagri - Turkey Abamectin Cotton 31.12.2017 Danitol 10% k.e. Sumitomo Chemical - 57 Fenpropathrin Cotton, mulberry, apple 31.12.2017 (R) Japan Uzphen 20% k.e. JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 58 Fenpropathrin Cotton 31.12.2014 (R) avod - Uzbekistan DVA mayt 72% Euro Team Ltd JV – 59 Propargite Cotton, apple 31.12.2015 k.e. (R) Uzbekistan - Germany Oltin Vodiy 57% Agrokim Ltd - Cotton, apple, vine, tomato, 60 Propargite 31.12.2016 k.e. (R) Uzbekistan potato 104 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Omayt 57% k.e. Cotton, apple, citrus, vine, 61 Kemtura Europe Ltd - UK Propargite 31.12.2017 (R) soy, sugar-beet, cherry-tree Cotton, apple, cherry-tree, Omayt 570 EW 62 Kemtura Europe Ltd - UK Propargite peach, plum. Vine, tomato, 31.12.2015 57% k.e.v. (R) potato Tetramayt 57% Moer Chemscience 63 Propargite Cotton 31.12.2017 k.e. (R) Co.Ltd. - China Uzmayt 30% s.p. JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 64 Propargite Cotton 31.12.2016 (R) avod - Uzbekistan Uzmayt 57% k.e. JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 65 Propargite Cotton,apple 31.12.2014 (R) avod - Uzbekistan Entomayt 570 EW Ifoda Agro Kimyo 66 Propargite Cotton 31.12.2015 57% k.e.v. (R) Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan Deltaphos 36% Bayer CropScience– deltamethrin + 67 Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2013 k.e. ( R ) Germany triazophos Primagold 36% Euro Team Ltd JV – deltamethrin + 68 Cotton 31.12.2017 k.e. (R) Uzbekistan - Germany triazophos Superjet 36% k.e. Agro Best Group - deltamethrin + 69 Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2013 (R) Turkey triazophos Dalmetrin 10% Dalston Associated SA - Cotton, tomato, mulberry, 70 Deltamethrin 31.12.2017 k.e. (R) Panama vine, apple, wheat, pasture Delzis 2,5% k.e. Euro Team Ltd JV – 71 Deltamethrin Cotton, wheat, pasture 31.12.2013 (R) Uzbekistan - Germany Deziban k.e. 25 Astra industrial complex 72 Deltamethrin Wheat, cotton 31.12.2016 g/l (R) – Saudi Arabia Cotton, sunflower, sugar-beet, tomato, corn, lucerne, Cruciferae's culture, tobaco, Dezis 2,5% k.e. Bayer CropScience - 73 Deltamethrin wheat, apple, pear, peach, 31.12.2016 (R) Germany vine, potato, cabbage, carrot, water-melon, melon, pasture natural growth, mulberry Dezis 10% k.e. Bayer CropScience - Tomato, vine, cotton, wheat, 74 Deltamethrin 31.12.2014 (R) Germany apple, mulberry Dezis 10% k.e. Bayer Environmental 75 Deltamethrin Pasture 31.12.2014 (R) Science SAS - France Agrokim Ltd - Wheat, mulberry, apple, 76 Tadj 10% k.e. (R) Deltamethrin 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan pasture, potatoes Pilardelta 2,5% Pilar Agri Science Corp. - Mulberry, pasture, tobaco, 77 Deltamethrin 31.12.2016 k.e. ( R ) Canada apple Ecozis 2,5% k.e. Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - 78 Deltamethrin Cotton, wheat, pasture 31.12.2014 (R) Uzbekistan Ecozis 10% s.p. Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - Cotton, wheat, mulberry, 79 Deltamethrin 31.12.2014 (R) Uzbekistan pasture Diazinon 60% k.e. 80 Nippon Kayaku - Japan Diazinon Wheat, rice 31.12.2014 (R) Close joint-stock Diazinon Express 81 company "Shelkovo Diazinon Wheat 31.12.2017 KE 600 g/l (R) Agrokhim", Russia Close joint-stock Gerold v.s.k. 240 82 company "Avgust", Diflubenzuron Pasture 31.12.2016 g/l Russia 105 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Close joint-stock Gerold UMO m.s. 83 company "Avgust", Diflubenzuron Pasture 31.12.2016 60 g/l Russia Krompton(Uniroyal Dimilin OF-6, 6% 84 Chemical) Registrations Diflubenzuron Pasture 31.12.2013 m.s. Ltd - UK Krompton(Uniroyal 85 Dimilin 48% k.s Chemical) Registrations Diflubenzuron Pasture, mulberry 31.12.2014 Ltd - UK Euro Team Ltd JV – 86 Difuz 48% k.s. Diflubenzuron Pasture, mulberry 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan - Germany Mergan OF-6, 6% Ifoda Agro Kimyo 87 Diflubenzuron Pasture 31.12.2014 m.s. Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan Sumitomo Chemical - 88 Zum 10% s.k. Etoxazole Cotton 31.12.2014 Japan Lime-sulfuric 89 Uzbekistan Polysulfide calcium All cultivation 31.12.2017 Decoction Soluble Academy of Science - 90 polysulfide Polysulfide calcium All cultivation 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan preparation Bayer CropScience - Cotton, mulberry, apple, vine, 91 Calipso 48% k.s. thiacloprid 31.12.2014 Germany tomato AÑ?etaplan 200 SL, Astra industrial complex 92 Ð?cetamiprid Cotton 31.12.2015 20% v.к. – Saudi Arabia Euro Team Ltd JV – 94 Achiv 20% v.p. Ð?cetamiprid Cucumber, mulberry 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan - Germany Agro Best Group - 95 Goldplan 20% s.p. Ð?cetamiprid Cotton 31.12.2013 Turkey Agrokim Ltd - 96 Camelot 20% s.p. Ð?cetamiprid Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Cotton, cucumber of covered 97 Mospilan 20% s.p. Nippon Soda - Japan Ð?cetamiprid soil, potato, sugar-beet, 31.12.2015 pasture, mulberry Cropprotect Ltd - 98 Nestor 20% s.p. Ð?cetamiprid Cotton, potatoes 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan Pilar Agri Science Corp. - Cotton, tomato of covered 99 Pilarmos 20% s.p. Ð?cetamiprid 31.12.2016 Canada soil, pasture, mulberry Tagspilan 20% Tagros Chemicals India 100 Ð?cetamiprid Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2014 s.p. Limited - India Karbofos 50% k.e. JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz Wheat, lucerna, apple, tomato, 101 Malathion 31.12.2015 (R) avod - Uzbekistan pasture, cotton, mulberry Wheat, rice, corn, pea pod, sugar-beet, beet, cotton, apple, pear, quince, cherry, plum, cherry-tree, unfruitful garden, currants, raspberries, Phuphanon 57% strawberries, vine, cabbage, 102 Keminova A/S - Denmark Malathion 31.12.2013 k.e. ( R ) tomato, cucumber, melon, water-melon, lucerna, tobaco, makhorka, sunflouer, soy, peanut, sesame, citrus, agricultural, natural growth, mulberry, fruit's culture, 106 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date berrie culture 103 Akito 10% k.e. Cerexagri - Turkey Beta-cypermethrin Cotton, mulberry, pasture 31.12.2013 Cotton, pasture, potato, Kinmix 5% k.e. 104 Agro-Kemy - Hungary Beta-cypermethrin cabbage, wheat, vine, apple, 31.12.2014 (R) plum Kurakron 50% 105 Singenta - Switzerland Profenofos Cotton 31.12.2014 k.e. 106 Lanser 75% r.p. United Phosphorus - India Acephate Cotton 31.12.2016 Arista Life SÑ?ience SAS - 107 Orten 75% r.p. Acephate Tobaco 21.12.2016 France 108 Marshall 25% k.e. FMС - USA Carbosulfan Sugar-beet 31.12.2016 Arista Life Science SAS - Cotton, Apple, Vine, pear, 109 Mital 20% k.e. Amitraz 31.12.2017 France peach, tomato Mitaron k.e. 500 Astra industrial complex 110 Bromopropylate Cotton 31.12.2016 g/l – Saudi Arabia Cotton, vine,apple, citrus, 111 Neoron 50% k.e. Singenta - Switzerland Bromopropylate 31.12.2017 currant Agro Best Group - 112 Eoksorrun 5% k.e. Hexythiazox Cotton 31.12.2013 Turkey 113 Nissoran 5% k.e. Nippon Soda - Japan Hexythiazox Cotton, apple 31.12.2014 114 Nissoran 10% k.e. Nippon Soda - Japan Hexythiazox Cotton, apple 31.12.2014 Moer Chemscience 115 Tetrasan 10% s.p. Hexythiazox Cotton 31.12.2013 Co.Ltd. - China Euro Team Ltd JV – 116 Heksorun 5% k.e. Hexythiazox Cotton 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan - Germany Entosoran 10% Ifoda Agro Kimyo 117 Hexythiazox Cotton, apple 31.12.2014 s.p. Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan 118 Nomolt 15% s.k. BASF - Germany Teflubenzuron Pasture 31.12.2013 Nomolt UMO 50 119 BASF Agro - Germany Teflubenzuron Pasture 31.12.2017 g/l m.s. Agrophos-D 55% Ifoda Agro Kimyo Cypermethrin + 120 Cotton, wheat 31.12.2014 k.e. (R) Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan chlorpyriphos Gurell-D 55% k.e. Agro Best Group - Cypermethrin + 121 Cotton 31.12.2013 (R) Turkey chlorpyriphos Dabl-D 55% k.e. Agrokim Ltd - Cypermethrin + Cotton, apple, wheat, vine, 122 31.12.2016 (R) Uzbekistan chlorpyriphos corn Moer Chemscience Cypermethrin + 123 Duet 55% k.e. (R) Cotton, apple, wheat 31.12.2014 Co.Ltd. - China chlorpyriphos Elnur-D 55% k.e. Nanjing Essence Fine- Cypermethrin + 124 Cotton, apple, wheat 31.12.2017 (R) Chemical - China chlorpyriphos Murell-D 55% Cypermethrin + 125 Sanjar Gold - Uzbekistan Cotton, apple, wheat 31.12.2017 k.e. ( R ) chlorpyriphos Nurell-D 55% k.e. Cypermethrin + 126 Dau AgroScience - USA Cotton, apple, wheat 31.12.2017 (R) chlorpyriphos Sayeren-s 55% Ceraminova A/S - Cypermethrin + 127 Cotton, apple 31.12.2013 k.e.( R ) Denmark chlorpyriphos 107 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Tagrell Ð’ 55% Tagros Chemicals India Cypermethrin + 128 Cotton, apple, wheat 31.12.2014 k.e.(R) Limited - India chlorpyriphos Urell-D 55% k.e. Cypermethrin + 129 United Phosphorus - India Cotton, apple 31.12.2016 (R) chlorpyriphos Zipi Plus 55% k.e. Agrotrade - Bulgary, Cypermethrin + 130 Cotton, apple 31.12.2016 (R) Agrorus -Russia chlorpyriphos Chlorzirin55% Euro Team Ltd JV – Cypermethrin + 131 Cotton, wheat 31.12.2013 k.e. (R) Uzbekistan - Germany chlorpyriphos Ziperphos 55% JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz Cypermethrin + Cotton, apple, wheat, 132 31.12.2015 k.e. avod - Uzbekistan chlorpyriphos mulberry 133 Ortus 5% S.K. Nihon Nohiaku - Japan fenpyroximate Cotton 31.12.2016 Baton k.e. 100 g/l Astra industrial complex 134 bifenthrin Cotton, tomato 31.12.2016 (R) – Saudi Arabia DVA-trin 10% Euro Team Ltd JV – 135 bifenthrin Cotton, apple, tomato 31.12.2015 k.e. (R) Uzbekistan - Germany Pilar Agree Saens Corp. - 136 Pillarstar 10% k.e. bifenthrin Cotton, apple, 31.12.2016 Canada Cotton, apple, tomato, 137 Talstar 10% k.e. FMC - USA bifenthrin 31.12.2014 mulberry 138 Baron 48% k.e. Agri Science - Turkey Chlorpyriphos Apple 31.12.2016 139 Pirinex 48% k.e. Makteshim-Agan - Israel Chlorpyriphos Cotton, apple 31.12.2014 Pirinex Super chlorpyriphos 140 Makteshim-Agan - Israel Cotton, apple, wheat, melons 31.12.2015 42% k.e. +bifenthrin Polytreen K profenofos + 141 Singenta - Switzerland Cotton, mulberry, pasture 31.12.2014 31,5% k.e. lambda-cyhalothrin 142 Polo 50% k.s.( R ) Singenta - Switzerland Diaphentiuron Cotton 31.12.2015 Ovipron 2000 k.e. decorative and forrest plants, 143 Cerexagri - Turkey petroleum oil 31.12.2014 800 g/l apple, pear Cotton, apple, pear, cherry, Preparation â„–30 FGUP “VNII HSZRâ€? - plum, decorative plants, 144 76% petroleum petroleum oil 31.12.2016 Russia currants, raspberries, citrus, emulsion vine Segra 80% s.p. Agrokim Ltd - 145 sulfur Cotton 31.12.2016 (fine-dyspersated) Uzbekistan Shorsyiskoe GHO - 146 Sulfur shredded sulfur All cultivation 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan Phar Kimyo Trans Ltd – 147 Sulfur shredded sulfur Cotton 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Institute of Flora and Sulfur water- Fauna Genofond of the 148 sulfur Cotton 31.12.2017 wettable Academy of Science of Uzbekistan Bestgol 200 g/l Agro Best Group - 149 esfenvalerate Wheat 31.12.2013 k.e. (R) Turkey Sumy-5 5% k.e. Agrokim Ltd - Cotton, apple, wheat, 150 esfenvalerate 31.12.2016 (R) Uzbekistan potatoes, vine, pasture Cotton, apple vine, potato, Sumitomo Chemical - cabbage, barley, wheat, rape, 151 Sumy-alfa 5% k.e. esfenvalerate 31.12.2017 Japan agricultural plants, natural growth 108 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Sumy-alfa 20% Sumitomo Chemical - lucerna, wheat, pasture, 152 esfenvalerate 31.12.2017 k.e. Japan mulberry, cotton JV Сlose JSC Esphen-Alpha 5% Potatoes, cotton, wheat, apple, 153 Elektrokhimzavod - esfenvalerate 31.12.2014 k.e.( R ) cabbage, pasture Uzbekistan JV Сlose JSC Esphen-Alpha 154 Elektrokhimzavod - esfenvalerate Cotton, pasture, mulberry 31.12.2013 20% k.e.( R ) Uzbekistan Sumitomo Chemical - 155 Sumition 50% k.e. fenitrothion Wheat, cotton 31.12.2016 Japan Bestcyper 25% Agro Best Group - 156 cypermethrin Cotton, mulberry, pasture 31.12.2013 k.e. (R) Turkey Dante 25% k.e. 157 Agri Science - Turkey cypermethrin Wheat 31.12.2016 (R) Moermetrin 25% Moer Chemscience Cotton, pasture, mulberry, 158 cypermethrin 31.12.2013 k.e. (R) Co.Ltd. - China wheat Cotton, apple, vine, tomato, 159 Superkill Agrephar AS - Belgium cypermethrin cucumber, cabbage, potato, 31.12.2016 soy, lucerna, wheat Himfoks 40% k.e. Himreaktiv-Snab Ltd - 160 cypermethrin Cotton, wheat, pasture 31.12.2017 (R) Uzbekistan Cotton, apple, cabbage, Zipermetrin 25% JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 161 cypermethrin potato, lucerne, wheat, 31.12.2015 k.e. ( R ) avod - Uzbekistan pasture, sunflower Cotton, apple, vine, tomato, cucumber, cabbage, potato, Agrotrade - Bulgary, Cruciferae's culture, sugar- 162 ZIPI 25% k.e.( R ) cypermethrin 31.12.2016 Agrorus -Russia beetsoy, lucerna, maize, pasture, water-melon, melon, carrot, wheat Ziprin k.e. 250 g/l Astra industrial complex 163 cypermethrin Cotton 31.12.2016 (R) – Saudi Arabia Cotton, apple, vine, tomato, cucumber, cabbage, Zirax 25% k.e. Cruciferae's culture, potato, 164 Cerexagri - Turkey cypermethrin 31.12.2015 (R) sugar-beetsoy, lucerne, maize, water-melon, melon, carrot, wheat, mulberry Zitrin 50% k.e. Euro Team Ltd JV – Apple, wheat, mulberry, 165 cypermethrin 31.12.2016 (R) Uzbekistan - Germany pasture Sherpa 25% k.e. Bayer CropScience – cotton, apple, potato, pasture, 166 cypermethrin 31.12.2013 (R) Germany natural growth Entometrin 25% Ifoda Agro Kimyo Cotton, wheat, pasture, 167 cypermethrin 31.12.2015 k.e. (R) Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan mulberry Titaron 30% 168 Nippon Soda - Japan fluakripyrim Cotton 31.12.2017 s.k.(R) Alphazid k.e. 100 Astra industrial complex 169 alpha-cypermethrin Wheat, potatoes, cotton 31.12.2016 g/l (R) – Saudi Arabia Besta Alpha KS Agro Best Group - 170 alpha-cypermethrin pasture 31.12.2013 100 g/l (R) Turkey Bestseller 10% 171 Agrephar AS - Belgium alpha-cypermethrin Cotton, wheat, pasture 31.12.2014 k.e. (R) 109 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Bestseller 20% Euro Team Ltd JV – 172 alpha-cypermethrin Pasture, wheat 31.12.2016 k.s. (R) Uzbekistan - Germany Tramp 10% k.s. Tagros Chemicals India 173 alpha-cypermethrin Cotton, pasture 31.12.2014 (R) Limited - India Phastak 10% s.k.( BASF Agro BV - 174 alpha-cypermethrin Cotton, pasture, potato, 31.12.2016 R) Switzerland Close joint-stock Phaskord k.e. 100 Cotton, mulberry, wheat, 175 company "Shelkovo alpha-cypermethrin 31.12.2015 g.l. ( R ) pasture Agrokhim", Russia Close joint-stock Phaskord UMO20 176 company "Shelkovo alpha-cypermethrin Pasture 31.12.2016 g.l. (R) Agrokhim", Russia Cotton, apple, vine, currants, potato, cabbage, rape, lucerne, Phenkill 20% k.e. 177 Cerexagri - Turkey fenvalerate perennial plants, maiz, wheat, 31.12.2016 (R) barley, carrot, melon, pasture, natural growth Phlumayt 20% 178 Agro-Kemy - Hungary flufenzin Cotton 31.12.2017 k.c. Barley v.k. 100 g/l Astra industrial complex 179 zeta-cypermethrin Potatoes, cotton 31.12.2016 (R) – Saudi Arabia Ph'yry 10% v.k. Cotton, potato, apple, vine, 180 FMC - USA zeta-cypermethrin 31.12.2015 (R) cabbage, pasture, mulberry Euro Team Ltd JV – lambda-cyhalothrin 181 Piligrim 24,7% Cotton, tomato, melons, corn 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan - Germany + thiametoxam Endgeo 24,7% lambda-cyhalothrin 182 Singenta - Switzerland Cotton, mulberry 31.12.2014 k.c. + thiametoxam Chemicals for seed processing before sowing Avalanche 70% Tagros Chemicals India 183 imidaÑ?loprid Cotton 31.12.2015 s.p. Limited - India Bayer CropScience– 184 Gaucho WS 70. imidaÑ?loprid Cotton 31.12.2014 Germany Dalston Associated SA - 185 Dalucho 70% c.p. imidaÑ?loprid Cotton 31.12.2016 Panama Close joint-stock 186 Tabu 50% company "Avgust", imidaÑ?loprid Cotton 31.12.2017 Russia privately owned natrium salt cotton's 187 Baraka 60% p.c. enterprise Baraka - Winter wheat, cotton 31.12.2014 soapstoka Uzbekistan Navkar Service - ammonium salt 188 Bakhor 93% v.r.p. Cotton, winter wheat, 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan salicylic acid Navkar Service - ammonium salt 189 Bakhor 60% v.r. Winter wheat 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan salicylic acid privately owned bacterium+antagoni 190 Blumovit v.g/ enterprise Amari Orxid st+humus+microele Cotton 31.12.2016 Farma - Uzbekistan ment Bayer CropScience– 191 Bronotak 12% p. bronopol Cotton 31.12.2017 Germany JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 192 Bronopol 12% p. bronopol Cotton 31.12.2017 avod - Uzbekistan 110 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date 193 Bron 12% v.d.g “Agro-Inovaciiâ€?, Russia bronopol Cotton 02.01.2016 AOYA Guy Zey - 194 Dabron 12% p. Chinese People's bronopol Cotton 01.01.2015 Republic Dalston Associated SA - 195 Dalbron 12% p. bronopol Cotton 02.01.2016 Panama Close joint-stock 196 Zirh 36% s.p. company "Avgust", bronopol Cotton 02.01.2016 Russia Close joint-stock 197 Emissar v.r.k. company "Shelkovo bronopol Cotton 02.01.2016 Agrokhim", Russia Bugdoydor 2% JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 198 dinikonazol Winter wheat 31.12.2015 k.c. avod - Uzbekistan Close joint-stock Vial TrasT 12,9% thiabendazole + 199 company "Avgust", Winter wheat 31.12.2014 v.c.k tebuconazole Russia flutriafol + 200 Vinzit 5% c.k. Keminova A/S - Denmark Winter wheat 31.12.2015 thiabendazole Krompton(Uniroyal Vitavaks 200 75% 201 Chemical) Registrations carboxin + thiram Wheat, cotton 31.12.2014 c.p. Ltd - UK Krompton(Uniroyal Vitavaks 200 FF 202 Chemical) Registrations carboxin + thiram Wheat, cotton, winter wheat 31.12.2014 34% v.c.k. Ltd - UK Close joint-stock Vitaroc 34% 203 company "Avgust", carboxin + thiram Cotton, winter wheat 31.12.2014 v.c.k/ Russia Dalvaks 34% Dalston Associated SA - 204 carboxin + thiram Cotton 31.12.2016 v.c.k. Panama imidacloprid + Gaucho 58,5% Bayer CropScience– 205 pencycuron + Cotton 31.12.2013 c.p. Germany thiram natrium salt humic NPP Print-TM - 206 GMK 30% p. acid + sulphate Cotton 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan copper mixture of natrium Darmon-4 25- 207 Darmon Ltd - Uzbekistan salt kapron & Cotton 31.12.2014 30% p/ carbolic acid 208 Dividend 3% k/c/ Singenta - Switzerland Difenokonazole Winter wheat 31.12.2017 209 Sidigard 3% k.c Paridgat Adgensys - India Difenokonazole Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Dividend star 036 difenoconazole + 210 "Singenta", Switzerland Winter wheat 31.12.2017 FS 3.6% cyproconazole Dividend extrim difenoconazole + 211 "Singenta", Switzerland Winter wheat 31.12.2014 115 FS 11.5% mefenoxam Copolymer fibers of IHRV under AS, nitron with 212 Dorilin 10% Cotton 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan nitrolignin and copper sulfate "Cerexagri Ziraat ve 2- 213 Kisan, 30% Cotton 01.01.2016 Kimya Sanayi ve Ticaret (tiocyanometiltio) 111 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Limited Sirketi", Turkey benzotiasol Cruiser 350 FS 214 "Singenta", Switzerland thiametoxam Cotton 31.12.2014 35% 215 Medal 35% "Paridjat Adjensis", India thiametoxam Cotton 31.12.2016 "Bayer CropScience", Tebukonasol+protic 216 Lomardor 40% Winter wheat 31.12.2014 Germany onasol "Cerexagri Ziraat ve 217 Lancer 80% Kimya Sanayi ve Ticaret acephate Cotton 31.12.2016 Limited Sirketi", Turkey "Dalston Associated SA", 218 Dalcephat 80% acephate Cotton 31.12.2016 Panama "Arista life Science SAS", 219 Orten 75% acephate Cotton 31.12.2016 France 220 Maxim 2,5% "Singenta", Switzerland fludioxonil Potatoes 31.12.2016 Maxim XL035 fludioxonil + 221 "Singenta", Switzerland Cotton 31.12.2014 FS, 3.5% mefenoxam 222 Marchal 40% "FMC", USA Carbosulfan Cotton 31.12.2017 "Bayer Crop Science", 223 Moncern 25% pencycuron Cotton 31.12.2013 Germany IHRV under AS, 224 Navruz 10% Triterpen acid Cotton 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan 225 P-4 65% Agrokim Ltd., Uzbekistan Dimetilol-carbamid Cotton 31.12.2015 226 Panoktin 35% Makteshim-Agan - Israel Guazatine Cotton,winter wheat 31.12.2014 "Yangi Tehnologiyalar" Mono, di, 227 Pahta 42% Cotton 31.12.2016 Ltd, Uzbekistan trietanolamines "Verisel Kafolat" Ltd, Mono, di, 228 Pahta M 20% Cotton 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan trietanolamines Chemical and polymer 229 Polysand 62.5% institute under AS, oxadixyl Cotton 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan "Bayer CropScience", propamocarb 230 Previcur SL 722 Cotton fine-fibre 31.12.2015 Germany hydrochloride "BASF AgroBV", 231 Premis 2.5% triticonazole Wheat 31.12.2016 Switzerland "Bayer CropScience", 232 Raksill 60 FS 6% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Germany Close joint-stock 233 Bunker 60 g/l company "Avgust", tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2015 Russia "Tagros Chemical India 234 Vinner 6% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2015 Ltd" Agro Best Group – 235 Gensil 6% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2014 Turkey Close joint-stock TEBU 60 ME 60 236 company "Shelkovo tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2014 g/l Agrokhim", Russia "Bayer CropScience", 237 Raksil new, 2.5% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Germany 112 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date 238 Gerkules 6% Agrokim Ltd., Uzbekistan tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2017 "Dalston Associated SA", 239 Daltebu FS 6% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Panama Moer Chemscience 240 Moerkonazol 6% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Co.Ltd. - China 241 Orius 6% Makteshim-Agan - Israel tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Pilar Agree Saens Corp. - 242 Pilartebu 6% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Canada Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - 243 Ekokinazol 6% tebuconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Uzbekistan "Sumitomo Chemical", 244 Sumy-8 2% FLO diniconazole-Ðœ Winter wheat, spring wheat 31.12.2016 Japan 245 Topsin-M 70% "Nippon Soda", Japan thiophanate methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Chemical and polymer 246 UzHitAN 2% institute under AS, khitozan Cotton 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - 247 Himoya 10% Polychloriodine Cotton 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Himoya - C Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - Polychloriodine +2 248 Cotton 31.12.2016 31.5% Uzbekistan acetatethanolamine Nematicids 249 Vidat L 24%* "Dupon" USA Oxamyl Tomato for hothouse 31.12.2016 Astra industrial complex 250 Faymet 24% v.k.* Oxamyl Tomato for hothouse 31.12.2016 – Saudi Arabia "Bayer CropScience", Tomato for hothouse, 251 Mokap 10% ethoprophos 31.12.2013 Germany Cucomber for hothouse Euro Team Ltd JV – 252 EZO 10% ethoprophos Cucomber for hothouse 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan - Germany Institut of microbiology Bacillus Lepidocid, p/ BA- 253 under Academy of thuringiensis var. Tomato 31.12.2016 3000 EA/mg Science, Uzbekistan kurstaki strain U56 Bacillus Private company thuringiensis 254 Prestij “AnGuzalAgroservisâ€? - Cotton 31.12.2017 var.thuringiensis, Uzbekistan BA-3000 ЕÐ?/ml Bacillus Private company thuringiensis 255 Prestij Plus k.e. “AnGuzalAgroservisâ€? - Cotton 31.12.2017 var.thuringiensis, Uzbekistan BA-3000 ЕÐ?/ml Virin HSK BA “Altay Vitaminiâ€? Close viral polyhedra 256 5*109 Cotton 31.12.2013 JSC - Russia strain XC-17 polyhedra/ml Private company Fungiosporin BA Complex microbial 257 “AnGuzalAgroservisâ€? - Potatoes, cotton 31.12.2014 1500 EA/ml spores Uzbekistan Complex spore Bacillus thuringie- 258 Beta Pro BASF – Germany Cotton 31.12.2016 nsis SPP kurstaki (100 billion/spore) 113 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Metarhizium 259 Green Gard v.r. BASF – Germany anisopline var. pasture 31.12.2016 acridum Pheromones Close joint-stock Isocin MK (3g/l) 260 company "Shelkovo Isopropilpfenacin Field with rodent 31.12.2015 (P) Agrokhim", Russia Cis - 11 - IBOH under Academy of Tomato, Cotton, maize, 261 Armigal 2 mg gexadecenal +cis - 31.12.2015 Science, Uzbekistan tobacco 9 - gexadecenal Cis - 11 - 262 Armigal 2 mg "Rukim" Moldova gexadecenal +cis - Cotton 31.12.2013 9 - gexadecenal "MobilUZ - group" Cis - 11 - 263 Armigal 2 mg Uzbek-American joint gexadecenal +cis - Cotton 31.12.2014 venture 9 - gexadecenal Cis - 11 - Cotton worm 2 Pheromon JV – 264 gexadecenal +cis - Cotton 31.12.2013 mg Uzbekisatn-Estonia 9 - gexadecenal Trance-10, trance- Atracon PF 12, cis-14 - 265 "Rukim" Moldova Mulberry-tree 31.12.2013 0.45mg gexadectrienilacetat e Acetatetrance - 10, "MobilUZ - group" Mulberry-tree PF trance-12, cis-14 - 266 Uzbek-American joint Mulberry-tree 31.12.2015 1.5 mg gexadectrienilacetat venture e Pheromon JV – Trance, trance-8, 267 Pheroflor-SR Apple 31.12.2014 Uzbekisatn-Estonia 10-dodekadienol Euro Team Ltd JV – 268 Garantex 0,005% brodifacoum Field with rodent 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan - Germany Herbicide "Bayer CropScience", 269 Alienza 600g/l Flurtamone Cotton 31.12.2013 Germany 270 AMIR 50% "Parijat Agentcis" India Acetochlor Cotton 31.12.2013 271 Dachlor 50 AOYA "Juy Zei", China Acetochlor Cotton 31.12.2013 272 Arsenal 25% (R) BASF, Germany Imazapyr Land for no-agricultural needs 31.12.2016 OOO "Agrokhim" 273 Asirius 40% bispyribac-sodium Rice 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Nominal 400 g/l Euro Team Ltd JV – 274 bispyribac-sodium Rice 31.12.2013 k.s. Uzbekistan - Germany Nominant 40% Euro Team Ltd JV – 275 bispyribac-sodium Rice 31.12.2015 k.s. Uzbekistan - Germany "Kumiay Chemical", 276 Nominy 400 g/l bispyribac-sodium Rice 31.12.2014 Japan Nominium 400 g/l Nanjing Essence Fine- 277 bispyribac-sodium Rice 31.12.2017 k.s. Chemical - China "Bayer CropScience", Mesosulfuron metil 278 Atlantis 3.6% Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Germany natrium 114 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date +iodinesulfuron metil natrium 279 Bazagran 48% BASF, Germany Bentazon Wheat, rye, barley, rice, maize 31.12.2014 JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz Maize, wheat, rye, barley, 280 Banvel 24% Dicamba 31.12.2015 avod - Uzbekistan oats "Bayer CropScience", glufosinate- Horticultural crops, vineyard, 281 Basta 14% 31.12.2017 Germany ammonium citrus plants, berry plantation Biozin Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - Dicamba + 282 Winter wheat 31.12.2015 360+22.2g/l Uzbekistan chlorsulfuron Close joint-stock Fenizan Dicamba + 283 company "Shelkovo Winter wheat 31.12.2014 360+22.2g/l chlorsulfuron Agrokhim", Russia Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - 284 Biostar 75% Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Close joint-stock 285 Granat 750 g/kg company "Shelkovo Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Agrokhim", Russia Euro Team Ltd JV – 286 Grand 75% v.d.g. Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan - Germany Granland 75% Euro Team Ltd JV – 290 Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2013 s.t.s Uzbekistan - Germany Granstar 75 DF Winter wheat, spring wheat, 291 "Dupon" USA Tribenuron-methyl 31.12.2014 75% s.t.s barley Gromstor 75% Agro Best Group - 292 Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2013 s.t.s Turkey "Dalston Associated SA", 293 Dalstar 75% Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Panama Moer Chemscience 294 Moerstar 75% Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Co.Ltd. - China Agrokim Ltd - 295 Tayfun 75% Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan 296 Trimeksa 75% MAC GmbH – Germany Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2017 297 Ekstrim 75% "Tagros Chemicals India" Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2015 Ifoda Agro Kimyo 298 Entostar Tribenuron-methyl Winter wheat 31.12.2014 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan Gezagard 50 50% Cotton, potatoes, carrot, 299 "Singenta", Switzerland Prometryn 31.12.2017 s.p. (R) celery, dill, parsley Gezagard 50% 300 "Singenta", Switzerland Prometryn Cotton under film 31.12.2017 s.k. (R) Avena Super 10% Moer Chemscience phenoxaprop-P- 301 Winter wheat 31.12.2017 k.e. Co.Ltd. - China ethyl +antidot Agro Best Group - phenoxaprop-P- 302 Avestar 10% k.e. Winter wheat 31.12.2013 Turkey ethyl +antidot "Agan Chemical phenoxaprop-P- 303 Bengal 120 EC Winter wheat, rice 31.12.2015 Manufactures" Ltd. Israel ethyl +antidot "Dalston Associated SA", phenoxaprop-P- 304 Dalzlak 7,5% Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Panama ethyl +antidot Close joint-stock phenoxaprop-P- 305 Lastik 70 g/l company "Avgust", Winter wheat 31.12.2016 ethyl +antidot Russia 115 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Close joint-stock phenoxaprop-P- 306 Lastik 100 g/l company "Avgust", Winter wheat 31.12.2015 ethyl +antidot Russia Close joint-stock Ovsyugen Extra phenoxaprop-P- 307 company "Shelkovo Winter wheat 31.12.2016 140+35 g/l ethyl +antidot Agrokhim", Russia "Bayer CropScience", phenoxaprop-P- 308 Puma super 7.5% Winter wheat, spring wheat 31.12.2016 Germany ethyl +antidot Agrokim Ltd - phenoxaprop-P- 309 Stella 7,5% Winter wheat 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan ethyl +antidot Ifoda Agro Kimyo phenoxaprop-P- 310 Ento Super 7,5% Winter wheat 31.12.2014 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan ethyl +antidot Dalzlak super "Dalston Associated SA", 311 fluazifop-P-butyl Cotton 31.12.2016 15% Panama Legion Super Ifoda Agro Kimyo 312 fluazifop-P-butyl Cotton, onion, carrot 31.12.2014 12,5% Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan Soy, white beet, table beet, mangel, carrot, onion of all Flusilad super generation, sunflower, cotton, 313 "Singenta", Switzerland fluazifop-P-butyl 31.12.2016 12,5% tomato, cabbage, cucumbers, horticultural crops, vineyard, citrus plants Cotton, white beet, apple-tree, 314 Fuzilad forte 15% "Singenta", Switzerland fluazifop-P-butyl 31.12.2017 vine, tomato haloxyfop-R- 315 Halomex 104 g/l MAC GmbH – Germany Cotton, onion 31.12.2017 methyl Dalzlak extra 104 "Dalston Associated SA", haloxyfop-R- 316 Cotton 31.12.2016 g/l Panama methyl Dragon Super 104 haloxyfop-R- 317 Sanjar Gold - Uzbekistan Potatoes, onion 31.12.2016 g/l methyl Cotton, white beet, mangel, Zellec super 104 haloxyfop-R- 318 "Dau AgroScience", USA carrot, onion of all generation, 31.12.2014 g/l methyl potatoes 319 Glyphogan 360 g/l "Maktechim Agan", Israel glyphosate Cotton, wheat 31.12.2014 Moer Chemscience 320 Glyphor 75,7% glyphosate Cotton, winter wheat 31.12.2017 Co.Ltd. - China "Keminava A/C" glyphosate Wheat, barley, cotton, land for 321 Glyphos 360 g/l 31.12.2015 Denmark no-agricultural needs Dalglyphos 500 "Dalston Associated SA", glyphosate 322 Cotton, winter wheat, vine 31.12.2017 g/l Panama glyphosate Fields for cotton and grain- 323 Daphostat 360 g/l AOYA "Juy Zei", China 31.12.2015 crops Nokdaun Max Euro Team Ltd JV – glyphosate 324 Winter wheat 31.12.2013 74,8% Uzbekistan - Germany glyphosate Fields for grain-crops, land 325 Raundal 360 g/l "Monsanto" USA 31.12.2016 for no-agricultural needs Agrokim Ltd - Cotton, winter wheat, land for 326 Smerch 360 g/l glyphosate 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan no-agricultural needs Agro Best Group - 327 Sonraund 480 g/l glyphosate orchards 31.12.2013 Turkey Terminator 360 Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - Cotton, winter wheat, fields 328 glyphosate 31.12.2017 g/l Uzbekistan for grain-crops 116 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - Cotton, winter wheat, land for 329 Terminator 75% glyphosate 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan no-agricultural needs Uragan Forte 500 glyphosate For fields for agricultural and 330 "Singenta", Switzerland 31.12.2013 g/l no-agricultiral needs, vineyard "Bayer CropScience", 331 Goltix 70% Metamitron Sugar-beet 31.12.2013 Germany 332 Azimex 50% MAC GmbH – Germany azimsulfuron Rice 31.12.2017 Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - 333 Alligator 50% azimsulfuron Rice 31.12.2017 Uzbekistan Agro Best Group - 334 Boliver 50% azimsulfuron Rice 31.12.2013 Turkey 335 Gulliver 50% "Dupon" USA azimsulfuron Rice 31.21.2014 Ifoda Agro Kimyo 336 Entoliver 50% azimsulfuron Rice 31.21.2015 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan Close joint-stock dicamba 337 Dimet 500 g/l company "Avgust", +metsulfuron- Winter wheat 31.12.2015 Russia methyl Derby 175 SC flumetsulam + 338 "Dau AgroScience", USA Wheat 31.12.2014 17,5% florasulam "Agan Chemical 339 Cotoran 80% fluometuron Cotton 31.12.2017 Manufactures" Ltd. Israel 340 Cotonex 80% "Maktechim Agan", Israel fluometuron Cotton 31.12.2015 JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 341 Cotoran 80% fluometuron Cotton 31.12.2013 avod - Uzbekistan 342 Londax 60% "Dupon" USA bensulfuron-methyl Rice 31.21.2014 Close joint-stock Wheat of indispensable 343 Magnum 600 g/l company "Avgust", metsulfuron-methyl condition sowing the next 31.13.2014 Russia year 344 Nabu 20% "Nippon Soda", Japan sethoxydim Onion, carrot, cotton 31.12.2014 345 Genotref48% Agri Science - Turkey trifluralin Cotton 31.12.2017 "Agan Chemical 346 Triflurex 48% trifluralin Cotton, tomato 31.12.2014 Manufactures" Ltd. Israel 347 Ordram 6E 72% "Singenta", Switzerland Molinate Rice 31.12.2015 (Uniroyal chemical) quizalofop-P- 348 Pantera 40 g/l Cotton, sugar-beet 31.12.2016 Registrations Ltd. UK tefuryl Ifoda Agro Kimyo quizalofop-P- 349 Enterra 40 g/l Cotton 31.12.2015 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan tefuryl quizalofop-Р-ethyl Cotton, patatoes, tomato, 350 Targa super 5% "Nissan Chemical" Japan 31.12.2014 cucomber Close joint-stock quizalofop-Р-ethyl Forvard MKE 60 351 company "Shelkovo Cotton, tomato 31.12.2017 g/l Agrokhim", Russia 352 PIK, 75% "Singenta", Switzerland Prosulfuron Winter wheat 31.12.2015 353 Rainbou 2.5% "Dau AgroScience", USA Penoxulam Rice 31.12.2017 Moer Chemscience 354 Zorro 33% pendimethalin Cotton, onion 31.12.2014 Co.Ltd. - China 117 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Astra industrial complex 355 Penmort 33% pendimethalin Cotton 31.12.2016 – Saudi Arabia Cotton, maize, potatoes, 356 Samuray 33% "Parijat Avencis" India pendimethalin 31.12.2016 onion, carrot Onion for all generation, 357 Stomp 33% BASF, Germany pendimethalin 31.12.2015 cotton maiz, carrot, potatoes Euro Team Ltd JV – 358 Stonp 50% pendimethalin Cotton, onion 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan - Germany Agrokim Ltd - Cotton, maize, potatoes, 359 Stop 33% pendimethalin 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan onion, carrot 360 Super Stomp 33% Sanjar Gold - Uzbekistan pendimethalin maize, potatoes, onion 31.12.2016 Cropprotect Ltd - 361 Trinity 33% pendimethalin Cotton 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan 362 Fist 33% Cerexagri - Turkey pendimethalin Cotton, onion, carrot 31.12.2017 Ifoda Agro Kimyo Cotton, maize, potatoes, 363 Entostop 33% pendimethalin 31.12.2015 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan onion, carrot Close joint-stock Estamp KE 330 364 company "Shelkovo pendimethalin Cotton, onion 31.12.2017 g/l Agrokhim", Russia 365 Satuгn 50% "Kumiay Cemical" Japan benthiocarb Rice 31.12.2014 dicamba 366 Serto plus 75% BASF, Germany Winter wheat, barley 31.12.2017 +tritosulfuron-ethyl Himreaktiv-Snab Ltd - pyrazosulfuron- 367 Avangard 10% Rice 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan ethyl pyrazosulfuron- 368 Sirius 10% "Nissan Chemical" Japan Rice 31.12.2015 ethyl 369 Starane 200 20% "Dau AgroScience", USA fluroxypyr Winter wheat, maize, onion 31.12.2014 Starane Premium 370 "Dau AgroScience", USA fluroxypyr Winter wheat, onion 31.12.2013 330 EC Euro Team Ltd JV – 371 Fluroxypyr 36% fluroxypyr Winter wheat, onion 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan - Germany Nanjing Essence Fine- 372 Himrane 400 g/l fluroxypyr Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Chemical - China Ifoda Agro Kimyo 373 Ento-Rane 20% fluroxypyr Wheat, onion 31.12.2015 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan 374 Stapl 85% "Kumiay Cemical" Japan pyrithiobac-sodium Cotton 31.12.2015 375 Titus 25% "Dupon" USA Rimsulfuron Maize, tomate 31.12.2014 clodinafop- Euro Team Ltd JV – 376 Gramin 8% propargyl + Winter wheat 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan - Germany cloquintocet mexyl clodinafop- "Dalston Associated SA", 377 Dalzlak-T 8% propargyl + Winter wheat 31.12.2013 Panama cloquintocet mexyl clodinafop- 378 Clodimex 8% MAC GmbH – Germany propargyl + Winter wheat 31.12.2017 cloquintocet mexyl Agro Best Group - clodinafop- 379 Terdok 8% Winter wheat 31.12.2013 Turkey propargyl + 118 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date cloquintocet mexyl clodinafop- 380 Topic 8% "Singenta", Switzerland propargyl + Winter wheat 31.12.2015 cloquintocet mexyl "Bayer CropScience", Iodosulfuron- 381 Hussar 5% Winter wheat 31.12.2014 Germany methyl sodium "Arista life Science SAS", 382 Centurion 25.4% clethodim Cotton, sugar-beet, onion 31.12.2015 France 383 Facet 25% BASF, Germany quinclorac Rice 31.13.2017 JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 384 Cefat 25% quinclorac Rice 31.13.2016 avod - Uzbekistan 385 Shogun 10% "Maktechim Agan", Israel propaquizafop Cotton 31.12.2017 Defoliants and Desiccant Close joint-stock 386 Avguron 500 g/l company "Avgust", thidiazuron Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2014 Russia "Bayer CropScience", 387 Dropp 50% thidiazuron Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2017 Germany Close joint-stock Avguron exrta thidiazuron + 388 company "Avgust", Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2014 540 g/l diuron Russia "Dalston Associated SA", thidiazuron + 389 Dalron super SK Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2016 Panama diuron Moer Chemscience thidiazuron + 390 Defolux 540 g/l Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2013 Co.Ltd. - China diuron "Bayer CropScience", thidiazuron + 391 Jinstar 540 g/l Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2014 Germany diuron "Bayer CropScience", thidiazuron + 392 Dropp Ultra 18% Cotton 31.12.2015 Germany diuron Close joint-stock thidiazuron + 393 Yanichar SK company "Shelkovo Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2016 diuron Agrokhim", Russia 394 Kabuki 2.5% "Nihon Nohiaku", Japan Piraphluphenetil Cotton 31.12.2014 IONH under AS, 395 Mezon, 53% Chlorat sodium Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan Phenilammoniy 2 TIIM, UzNIISGPZ, 396 Optim - 2 70% chlor etil Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan phosphonat Reglon Super 397 "Singenta", Switzerland diquat Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2016 15% 398 Rivet 24% "FMC" USA Carventrazon - etil Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2014 IONH under AS, Tricarbamidohlorat 399 Sadaf 70% Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2015 natriy Uzbekistan IONH under AS, Tricarbamidohlorat 400 Sadaf - K 96.6% Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan natriy IONH under AS, Tricarbamidohlorat 401 Sihat70.5% Cotton middle- and fine- fibre 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan natriy 119 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Dicarbomidchloridc Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - 402 Samara 70% hloratnatriy + Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan diacetatetanolamin Chlorat natrium + 2 IONH under AS, chloretilphosphonat 403 Sardor 52% Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan monoetanol ammoniy Chlorat natrium + 404 Sahovat 45% HosilotLtd, Uzbekistan phosphat Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2017 etanolamina 365 g/l chlorat IONH under AS, magniy + 4.5 g/l 405 Super HMD j Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan phosphat etanoplamin "Bayer CropScience", Etephon + 406 Finish 540 g/l Cotton middle- and fine- fibre 31.12.2015 Germany ciclonilid 407 Polydef 18% IHFP, Uzbekistan Chlorat Magniy Cotton 31.12.2014 Chlorat Magniy Cotton middle- and fine- 408 "Azot", Uzbekistan Chlorat Magniy 31.12.2013 60% fibre, rice Chlorat Magniy 409 "Azot", Uzbekistan Chlorat Magniy Cotton 31.12.2014 36% Chlorat Magniy 410 "Azot", Uzbekistan Chlorat Magniy Cotton 31.12.2014 43% Chlorat Magniy IONH under AS, 411 UzDEF 33% + 10% Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2017 Uzbekistan carbamide Chlorat Magniy + IONH under AS, 412 UzDEF-I carbamide + Cotton middle-fibre 31.12.2017 Uzbekistan acetamiprid Growth Regulators Privately owned Natriy of cotton 413 Baraka 60% enterprise "Baraka", Winter wheat 31.12.2014 soapstok Uzbekistan Ammonium of OOO "Navkar servis", salicylic acid 414 Bahor 93% Winter wheat, cotton 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan (ammonium salicylate) Vitavax 200 FF (Uniroyal chemical) 415 Carboxin + thiram Winter wheat, cotton 31.12.2014 34% Registrations Ltd. UK Close joint-stock 416 Vitaros 34% company "Avgust", Carboxin + thiram Cotton 31.12.2014 Russia Cotton middle-fibre, cotton, Gumat Natriy Research-and-production Natrium salt of 417 wheat, tomato, cucumber, 31.12.2015 30% association "Print - TM", guminium ocid potatoes Privately owned Gumat Natriy Natrium salt of 418 enterprise "Gutnikov", Сotton, tomato 31.12.2017 30% guminium ocid Uzbekistan Privately owned Natrium salt of 419 Gummi 30% enterprise "Green grass", Tomato, cucumber, cabage 31.12.2014 guminium ocid Uzbekistan 120 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date "Dalston Associated SA", 420 Dalpiksi 5% mepiquat chloride Cotton 31.12.2016 Panama 421 Pahta-djan 98% Agrokim Ltd., Uzbekistan mepiquat chloride Сotton 31.12.2017 JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 422 Uztikc 5% mepiquat chloride Cotton 31.12.2016 avod - Uzbekistan Ifoda Agro Kimyo 423 Entojean 98% mepiquat chloride Cotton 31.12.2015 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan IONH under AS, Phosphat-etanol- Wheat, cotton, tomato, 424 Madad 50 g/l 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan amin cucumber, patatoes Phosphat-etanol- Winter wheat, cotton, tomato, 425 Moviy 50% "Hosilot"Ltd, Uzbekistan 31.12.2014 amin patatoes, cabbage IONH under AS, Phosphat-etanol- Wheat, cotton, tomato, 426 Hosil 40% 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan amin patatoes, cabbage IHRV under AS, Polymer of 427 Nitrolin 10% Cotton, cucumber 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan saponificated nitron Zarina-Zerno Ltd, Salt of guminium 428 KGMU Cotton, wheat, tomato 31.12.2017 Uzbekistan ocid Albit-Lingumat Ltd, Salt of guminium 429 Linogumat Cotton, wheat 31.12.2013 Uzbekistan ocid "Grand Agro Plus" Salt of guminium 430 Ocigumat 10% Cotton, cucumber 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan ocid “TBS Groupâ€? Ltd, Salt of guminium Cotton, wheat, tomato, 431 UzGUMI 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan ocid potatoes “Specesnastika SM Salt of guminium 432 Edagum SM Cotton, wheat, tomato, rice 31.12.2013 Serviceâ€? Ltd, Russia ocid 433 P-4 65% Agrokim Ltd., Uzbekistan Dimetilol-carbamid Cotton 31.12.2015 Copolymer fibers of IHRV under AS, Cotton, winter wheat, tomato, 434 Roslin 10% nitron with 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan cucumber nitrolignin IGEBR under AS, Tetrametilendiamin 435 Rostbisol 60% Cotton 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan of oxalic acid Stimulator T 2.5 Biochemical Instutite Di-iodine-ociphen- 436 Cotton 31.12.2016 g/l under AS, Uzbekistan oci di-phenilanin IONH under AS, Ocietil urea 437 TJ-85 p. Cotton 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan zinchydrate IHRV under AS, Derivative of 438 Uchkun 1% Cotton 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan isoprene NTC “Himstimâ€?, NTPC Furfuroliden- 439 HS-2 70% “Dilfayz-Sulnodiraâ€?, Cotton, wheat 31.12.2014 dicarbamide Uzbekistan chlormequat 440 CeCeCe 750 g/l BASF, Germany Wheat 31.12.2016 chloride "Dalston Associated SA", 441 Dalrost 720 g/l etephon Cotton 31.12.2017 Panama JVСloseJSCElektrokhimz 442 Uzprep 720 g/l etephon Cotton middle- and fine- fibre 31.12.2013 avod - Uzbekistan Bacillus Institute of Microbiology, licheniformis strain Verbaktin 50 443 IHRV under AS, 234 + streptomyces Cotton 31.12.2015 mg/ml Uzbekistan roseoflavus strain 33 121 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Trichorderma Private company Lignorum strain 444 Plantastim “AnGuzalAgroservisâ€? - Tomato 31.12.2015 AN 988, BÐ? – 3000 Uzbekistan ЕÐ?/g Fungicides Quadris 25% Vine, tomato and cucumber 445 "Singenta", Switzerland azoxystrobin 31.12.2014 (250 g/l) under film Geros 25% 446 Agri Science - Turkey azoxystrobin Vine 31.12.2016 (250 g/l) Fundazol 50% Wheat, tomato, cucumber, 447 Agro-Kemy - Hungary benomyl 31.12.2015 (500 g/kg) apple, pear, vine Vectra 10% "Bayer CropScience", 448 bromuconazole Vine, apple 31.12.2015 (100 g/l) Germany dimethomorph 90 Akrobat MC 690 Potatoes, cucumber, onion, 449 BASF, Germany g/kg + mancozeb 31.12.2016 g/kg vine 600 g/kg Broader 30% k.e. Agro Best Group - difenoconazole + 450 Wheat 31.12.2014 (150 g/l + 150 g/l) Turkey propiconazole Strobi 50% 451 BASF, Germany kresoxym-methyl Apple 31.12.2014 (500 g/kg) 452 Benvol 50% Agri Science - Turkey kresoxym-methyl Apple 31.12.2016 Ridomil Gold MC mancozeb + 453 68% "Singenta", Switzerland Tomato, vine 31.12.2016 metalaxyl-Ðœ (640+40 g/kg) Fungoceb Plus Euro Team Ltd JV – mancozeb + 454 68% Tomato, vine 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan - Germany metalaxyl-Ðœ (640+40 g/kg) Lotos 10% Moer Chemscience Vine, tomato and cucumber, 455 penconazole 31.12.2014 (100 g/l) Co.Ltd. - China apple Pavlina 10% Cropprotect Ltd - 456 penconazole Vine, apple 31.12.2014 (100 g/l) Uzbekistan Euro Team Ltd JV – 457 Penco 10% penconazole Vine, apple 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan - Germany Vine, apple, cucumber, Topaz 10% 458 "Singenta", Switzerland penconazole tomato, peach, wild 31.12.2017 (100 g/l) strawberry Himreaktiv-Snab Ltd - 459 Topuzum 10% penconazole Vine 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan Fulpas 10% Agro Best Group - 460 penconazole Vine, apple 31.12.2013 (100 g/l) Turkey Ento Paz Extra Ifoda Agro Kimyo 461 penconazole Vine, apple, tomato 31.12.2014 10% (100 g/l) Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan picoxistrobin 200 "Dupon International 462 Akanto Plus 28% g/l + Ñ?yproconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Operations" - Switzerland 80 g/l Apple, pear, cheary, plum, Lime-sulfuric vine, cucumber, apricot, peas, 463 Uzbekistan polysulfide calcium 31.12.2017 Decoction haricot, sugar beet, raspberry, rose 464 Previkur SL 722 "Bayer CropScience", propamocarb Cotton fine-fibre, tomato 31.12.2015 122 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Germany hydrochloride 722 g/l propamocarb Regal Globe Service Ltd - 465 Prevekur 60,7% hydrochloride Tomato 31.12.2014 Uzbekistan 722 g/l propamocarb Prokure 772 SL Astra Industrial Complex 466 hydrochloride Tomato, cucumber, potatoes 31.12.2015 77,2% Co.Ltd. – Saudi Arabia 722 g/l propamocarb Euro Team Ltd JV – hydrochloride 400 Vine, tomato, cucumber, 467 Proksanil 45% 31.12.2016 Uzbekistan - Germany g/l + cymoxanil 50 potatoes g/l 468 Bumper 25% "Maktechim Agan", Israel Propiconazole Vine, wheat 31.12.2014 "Tagros Chemical India 469 Krest 25% Propiconazole Vine, winter wheat 31.12.2015 Ltd" Astra Industrial Complex 470 Tilzole 25% Propiconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2015 Co.Ltd. – Saudi Arabia Close joint-stock 471 Titul 390 g/l company "Shelkovo Propiconazole Vine, winter wheat 31.12.2015 Agrokhim", Russia Propiconazole 90 Makteshim Chemical 472 Bumper Super g/l + prochloraz Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Works Ltd – Israel 400 g/l Close joint-stock Kolosal Pro propiconazole + Vine, winter wheat, apple, 473 company "Avgust", 31.12.2015 (300 + 200 g/l) tebuconazole plum Russia Close joint-stock Titul Duo propiconazole + 474 company "Shelkovo Winter wheat 31.12.2015 (200 + 200 g/l) tebuconazole Agrokhim", Russia Alto Super 33% propiconazole + 475 "Singenta", Switzerland Winter wheat 31.12.2015 (250 + 80 g/l) Ñ?yproconazole 476 Nikarden 70% Agri Science - Turkey Propineb 700 g/kg Vine 31.12.2017 Segra 80% s.p. Agrokim Ltd - 477 sulfur Cotton 31.12.2016 (fine-dyspersated) Uzbekistan Shorsuv hamkor biznes 478 Sulfur shredded sulfur All cultivation 31.12.2013 kapitalLtd - Uzbekistan 479 Iron vitriol 53% NGMK, Uzbekistan ferrous sulphate Apple, pear, vine 31.12.2013 Copper vitriol Apple, pear, apricot, plum, 480 98% AGMK, Uzbekistan copper sulfate cherry, sweet cherry, peach, 31.12.2013 (980 g/kg) currants Apple, pear, apricot, plum, cherry, sweet cherry, peach, currants, quince, citrus crops, copper sulfate + 481 Liquid Bordeaux Uzbekistan potatoes, tomato, cucumber, 31.12.2017 calcium hydroxide onion, melon, water melon, mangel, red and sweet beet, lucerne "Dalston Associated SA", 482 Daleton 250 g/l tebuconazole Vine 31.12.2017 Panama 123 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Close joint-stock Kolosal 25% 483 company "Avgust", tebuconazole Vine, winter wheat 31.12.2014 (250 g/l) Russia Pilarkur 25% Pilar Agree Saens Corp. - 484 tebuconazole Vine, wheat 31.12.2016 (250 g/l) Canada Duplet TT 22,5% Agrokim Ltd - tebuconazole + 485 Vine, wheat, rice 31.12.2014 (125+100 g/l) Uzbekistan triadimefon Zangcid 22,5% Ecokimyobioservis Ltd - tebuconazole + 486 Wheat 31.12.2014 (125+100 g/l) Uzbekistan triadimefon Tebumex Plus tebuconazole + 487 22,5% MAC GmbH – Germany Vine 31.12.2017 triadimefon (125+100 g/l) Torso 22,5% Euro Team Ltd JV – tebuconazole + 488 Vine, winter wheat 31.12.2013 (125+100 g/l) Uzbekistan - Germany triadimefon Uredocin 22,5% Moer Chemscience tebuconazole + 489 Vine, wheat, rice 31.12.2014 (125+100 g/l) Co.Ltd. - China triadimefon Foliar BT 22,5% Euro Team Ltd JV – tebuconazole + 490 Vine, wheat, rice 31.12.2015 (125+100 g/l) Uzbekistan - Germany triadimefon Folikur BT 22,5% "Bayer CropScience", tebuconazole + 491 Vine, wheat, rice 31.12.2016 (125+100 g/l) Germany triadimefon Entolikur 22,5% Ifoda Agro Kimyo tebuconazole + 492 Vine, wheat, rice 31.12.2014 (125+100 g/l) Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan triadimefon tebuconazole + "Bayer CropScience", 493 Falkon 46% spiroxamine + Winter wheat 31.12.2017 Germany triadimenol tebuconazole + 494 Malkon 46% Sanjar Gold - Uzbekistan spiroxamine + Vine 31.12.2017 triadimenol Topsin-M 70% 495 "Nippon Soda", Japan thiophanate-methyl Cucumber, vine, apple, rice 31.12.2014 (700 g/kg) Wheat, barley, maize, oat, Bayleton 25% "Bayer CropScience", sugar-beet, cucumber, tomato, 496 triadimefon 31.12.2013 (250 g/kg) Germany melon, apple, vine, wild strawberry, plum, rose MM Agro Corporation, 497 Batyr 25% triadimefon Vine, apple 31.12.2013 USA Saprol 20% Sumitoma Corporation, 498 triforine Vine, apple 31.12.2015 (200 g/l) Japan "Dau AgroScience Export 499 BIM 750 g/kg tricyclazole Rice 31.12.2014 SAS", France Famoxadone 500 Ultimatrix 52,5% Agri Science - Turkey 225g/kg + Cucumber 31.12.2017 cymoxanil 300g/kg "Dupon International 501 Panch 40% flusilazole Vine, apple 31.12.2013 Operations" - Switzerland 502 Impakt 25% Keminova A/S - Denmark flutriafol Vine, apple, winter wheat 31.12.2016 Himpakt 35% Himreaktiv-Snab Ltd - 503 flutriafol Vine, apple, winter wheat 31.12.2016 (350 g/l) Uzbekistan Makteshim Chemical folpet 700g/kg + 504 Shavit F 72% Vine, tomato, cucumber 31.12.2016 Works Ltd – Israel triadimenol 20g/kg 124 Name of the Registration S/Nb Origin of the production Type of chemicals Names of the tested crops chemicals expiry date Copper Himreaktiv-Snab Ltd - Vine, coniferous and 505 oxychloride 85% copper oxychloride 31.12.2015 Uzbekistan deciduous decorative plants (850 g/kg) Amarant 50% 506 Agri Science - Turkey copper oxychloride Vine 31.12.2016 (500 g/kg) Entohlorok 85% Ifoda Agro Kimyo 507 copper oxychloride Vine 31.12.2016 (850 g/kg) Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan Kurzat R "Dupon International copper oxychloride Vine, tomato, cucumber, 508 (397,5 g/kg + 31.12.2013 Operations" - Switzerland + cymoxanil potatoes 42g/kg) Entohlorok Plus Ifoda Agro Kimyo copper oxychloride 509 (397,5 g/kg + Vine, potatoes 31.12.2017 Himoya Ltd - Uzbekistan + cymoxanil 42g/kg) cymoxanil 50g/kg + 510 Centrik 50% Agri Science - Turkey Potatoes 31.12.2016 mancozeb 450g/kg Cymoxanil 60g/kg 511 Cimopro 76% Agri Science - Turkey + propineb Tomato 31.12.2017 700g/kg 512 Konsul 12,5% BASF, Germany epoxiconazole Winter wheat 31.12.2016 Rex Duo 49,5% epoxiconazole + 513 BASF, Germany Winter wheat 31.12.2013 (187g/l + 310g/l) thiophanate-methyl Private company Sporagin 1500 Bacillus subtilis, 514 “AnGuzalAgroservisâ€? - Winter wheat, cotton 31.12.2016 EA/g strain AN 2004 Uzbekistan BIST k.s. 0,8-1 National University, Pseudomonas 515 Tomato, cucumber 31.12.2015 billion/1 ml Uzbekistan putida Pp-1 *Used only by special trained personnel with strict following the instructions with application of substance for individual protection of respiratory organs, that filitirates through masks and special dress coat. Source: Handbook: List of pesticides and agrochemicals permitted for use in agriculture in Republic of Uzbekistan (Tashkent, 2013). 125 ANNEX12 LIST OF CHEMICAL PROTECTANTS, INCLUDED INTO THE REGISTER OF FORBIDDEN AND LIMITED ON APPLICATION THE ACTIVE AND NON-ACTIVE INGREDIENTS. Registration Registration # Name of preparation or reactant CAS No. period Reason of forbidden or limitation date validity 1. DDT and metabolites. 1.1-di-(4-chlorophenol) 2.2.2 50-29-3 High-persistent pesticide, with full-blown cumulative behavior 28.02.2001 Permanently trichloroethane (pesticide) 2. Hexachloran (sum of isomers GCCH) 1.2.3.4.5.6.- 608-73-1 Stable in external environment, with carcinogenic, embryotoxic action, 28.02.2001 Permanently Hexachloro-cyclohexane(pesticide) cumulative behavior. High level of products pollution 3. 2.4.5-T (dynoxol TCF)* (pesticide) 93-76-5 28.03.2002 Permanently Teratogen, carcinogen, mutagen. Stable in external environment 4. Aldrin ** (pesticide) 309-00-2 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Stable in external environment 5. Captaphol * (pesticide) 2425-06-1 28.03.2002 Permanently Carcinogenic, Stable in external environment 6. Chlordan ** (pesticide) 57-74-9 28.03.2002 Permanently Stable in external environment 7. Chlordimeform * (pesticide) 6164-98-3 28.03.2002 Permanently Mutagen, Carcinogenic, Stable in external environment 8. Chlorbenzilat * (pesticide) 510-15-6 28.03.2002 Permanently Oncogenic, Stable in external environment 9. Heptachlor ** (pesticide) 76-44-8 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Carcinogenic, Stable in external environment 10. Deldrin ** (pesticide) 60-57-1 28.03.2002 Permanently Virulent toxic agent, Stable in external environment 11. Dinoseb and it’s salts * (pesticide) 88-85-7 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Teratogen, Stable in external environment 12. 1.2 – Dibromethane * (pesticide) 106-93-4 28.03.2002 Permanently Oncogenic, Stable in external environment 13. Fluoroacetamide * (pesticide) 640-19-7 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Stable in external environment 14. Hexachlorobenzene ** (pesticide) 118-74-1 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly cumulative, Stable in external environment 15. Lindan * compound 58-89-9 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly cumulative, Oncogenic, Stable in external environment 16. Mercury compounds * phenol 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Stable in external environment 17. Pentachloro-phenol * phenol 87-86-5 28.03.2002 Permanently Full-blown skin-resorptive action, Stable in external environment 18. Monocortophos * (dangerous formulation) 6923-22-4 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Stable in external environment 19. Metamydophos * (dangerous formulation) 10265-92-6 28.03.2002 Permanently Stable in external environment 20. Phosphamydon * (dangerous formulation) 13171-21-6 28.03.2002 Permanently Stable in external environment 21. Methyl-parathyon * (dangerous formulation) 298-00-0 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Teratogen, embryotoxic, Stable in external environment 22. Parathyon * (dangerous formulation) 56-38-2 28.03.2002 Permanently Highly toxic, Stable in external environment 23. Endrin ** (pesticide) 77-20-8 21.10.2005 Permanently Highly toxic, Stable in external environment 24. Mirex ** (pesticide) 2385-85-5 21.10.2005 Permanently Carcinogenic, Stable in external environment 25. Toxaphen ** (pesticide) 8001-35-2 21.10.2005 Permanently Highly toxic, Carcinogenic 126 26. TMTD (thiram, thiuram) 137-26-8 26.06.2013 Permanently Fetotoxic, gonadotoxic, teratogen, carcinogen, mutagen. 27. Carbendazim 10605-21-7 26.06.2013 Permanently Teratogen, carcinogen, mutagen, fetotoxic, gonadotoxic. * the most dangerous chemical compounds, forbidden and limitation of which is approved by the Rotterdam convention. ** the most dangerous chemical compounds, forbidden and limitation of which is approved by the Stockholm convention. Decision to include these preparations to the given “Registerâ€? was accepted on the sittings of State Chemical Commission (Goshimkimissiya) on 28 March 2001, 28 March 2002, 21 October 2005, 26 June 2013. Source: List of chemical protectants, included into the register of forbidden and limited on application the active and non-active ingredients (Tashkent, 2013) 127 ANNEX 13 SUMMARY OF PROJECT OUTCOMES OF RESP-II UZ-RESP-II. Outputs of the Credit Component and Environmental impacts A B C D E F G UNIT TOTAL Positive Env Impacts Negative Env. Impacts Mitigation Measures Responsibility reducing pollution by increasing fuel and lubrican efficiency; incease of soil compacting the earth from over fertility (organic structure, capillaries, use of the machine on the field supply and use of appropriate Agricultural machinery units 287 farmers drainability) by replacing the top soil (esp. wheeled tractors, not the type and size equipemnt layer through more timely cultivation & track tractors) ploughing (i) regulations on animal Increase in organic fertilizer (manure), overgrazing; contamination of pressures on pastures (e.g. 1 increase of crop rotation and (i) local authorities; (ii) Livestock (cattle) heads 2,396 surface & ground waters from cattle/1 ha irrigated land and 1,5 diversification of plants, (e.g. alfa-alfa farmers concentration of uncleaned wastes ha pasture; (ii) use of manure as increases nitrogen level of the soil) fertilizer (i) regulations on animal Increase in organic fertilizer (manure), overgrazing; contamination of pressures on pastures (e.g. 10 increase of crop rotation and (i) local authorities; (ii) Livestock (sheeps) heads 1,910 surface & ground waters from sheeps/1 ha irrigated land and diversification of plants, (e.g. alfa-alfa farmers concentration of uncleaned wastes 1,5 ha pasture; (ii) use of increases nitrogen level of the soil) manure as fertilizer contamination of surface & Poultry (chickens) heads 601,788 Increase in organic fertilizer (manure) ground waters from concentration use of manure as fertilizer poltry farmers of uncleaned wastes Rural advisory services for Use of intensive technology increases water pollution, soil scontents in training in safe pesticide use and training; farmers for Orchards and vineyards hectars 278 yeilds per hectar, which reduces cropping using pesticides handling; introduction of IPM adoption of appropriate area. methods Use of modern technology and storage the air pollution, safety and health, Using acceptable Substitutes for Cold storage (capacity) tonns 5,550 credit recipient farm outputs noise CFCs introduce IPM, biological use of negative pesticieds, wastes treatments; disposal of old Use of intensive technology increases from cleaning, wastes from metals and structures to screap contractors/project Green-houses projects 4 yeilds per hectar, which reduces cropping cleaning, left over materials from heaps, watering the surface to manager area. construction, oil & fuel spils, dust, reduce dust, working during noise daytime to avoid noise 128 Agro-processing (fruits wastewater treatment, proper Water pollution.safety and and vegetables, milk Use of modern technology and processing siting, proper control of projects 16 health.biophysical and cultural credit recipient processing, production the farm outputs construction wastes and impact losses through location of bakery products, etc) (noise, dust) TOTAL COST USD 35,810,733 Source: M&N unit of RRA 129