Center for International Forestry Research;natural ecosystem;household income;crop income;marginal productivity of labor;Climate Change and Poverty;climate variability ...  Voir la suite crop production;effect of climate change;impacts on crop production;cope with climate change;exposure to climate risks;impact of climate change;climate variable;climate anomalies;rural household income;climate change impact;standard deviation;change in income;annual mean temperature;center for development;wages and salary;crop and livestock;agriculture and forestry;increase in labor;sustainable forest use;decline in agriculture;segments of society;impact of weather;adaptation to change;difference in income;income from livestock;source income;agricultural production risk;climate change adaptation;future climate change;extremes of climate;health of ecosystems;access to water;terrestrial carbon sink;local social capital;impact of temperature;variability in climate;poor rural household;source of income;economic shock;weather event;rural livelihood;weather shock;agricultural income;Rural Poor;marginal effect;household asset;forest extraction;temperature anomaly;natural forest;biomass production;tropical forest;ecosystem service;income source;livestock income;Animal Husbandry;precipitation anomalies;environmental production;climate shock;crop cultivation;production system;weather fluctuations;wage employment;income components;biomass increment;conceptual framework;shock waves;income shortfall;descriptive statistic;income generation;extractive activity;household use;annual precipitation;income shock;weather variables;biomass growth;natural environment;hot site;livelihood vulnerability;labor productivity;biomass accumulation;Livestock Production;labor reallocation;wage income;Livestock Husbandry;biomass stock;opportunity cost;regional variation;average temperature;selection bias;wild resources;coping strategy;income composition;income share;household level;timber production;life science;income stream;agricultural activity;agroforestry system;income strategy;primary data;income variable;data limitation;seasonal pattern;cloud forest;plant growth;fertilization effect;climate zone;carbon loss;tropical deforestation;climate model;food extract;wood extraction;firewood collection;correlation analysis;water availability;environmental science;heavy rain;insurance mechanism;climate vulnerability;land-poor household;minority group;poverty status;durable good;Durable goods;organic carbon;household characteristic;climate extremes;multiple regression;extractive resource;climate impact;inequality level;empirical support;supply response;Population Density;Environmental Safety;regular income;equal distribution;local economy;policy relevance;marginal adjustment;emergency response;climate condition;income increase;partial compensation;crop cycle;income category;temperature extremes;crop loss;vulnerable household;plant disease;insect attack;environmental shock;Small-Scale Mining;income regressions;coping capacity;numerical value;forest product;slope coefficient;income threshold;climate difference;poverty dynamic;production pattern;climatic condition;production gain;severe drought;income impact;better-off household;raw data;weather variability;weather station;environmental sector;negative effect;degradation effect;wage labor;production base;mitigation activity;fragile ecosystem;empirical result;methodological problems;seasonal variation;climatic variability;environmental degradation;exogenous shock;soil erosion;resource extraction;differential impact;asset loss;risk averse;risk aversion;income fluctuation;ecosystem goods;open access;off-farm income;weather effects;expected utility;wood product;quantitative assessment;agriculture system;agriculture income;multiplier effect;urban employment;resource sector;climate sensitivity;labor allocation;diminishing return;Natural Resources;wage work;predicted change;dry forest;positive impact;forest productivity;Forest Conservation;positive production  Réduire