Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Report No: ICR00004533 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IDA-49130, IBRD-80390) ON A CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 48.90 MILLION (US$76.80 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND A LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$3.20 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN FOR A WATER USERS ASSOCIATION DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT PROJECT December 30, 2018 Water Global Practice Europe And Central Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective Jun 30, 2018) Currency Unit = New Azerbaijani Manat (AZN) AZN 1.70 = US$1 US$0.71095 = SDR 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AF Additional Financing AIOJSC Amelioration and Irrigation Open Joint Stock Company CBA Cost-benefit Analysis CPF Country Partnership Framework CPS Country Partnership Strategy CSU Central WUA Support Unit EA Environmental Assessment EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return EMMP Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan EMP Environmental Management Plan ENPV Economic Net Present Value FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return FNPV Financial Net Present Value FPP Farm Privatization Project GoA Government of Azerbaijan GDP Gross Domestic Product I&D Irrigation and Drainage ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report IDSMIP Irrigation Distribution System and Management Improvement Project ISF Irrigation Service Fee ISM Implementation Support Mission LAI Law on Amelioration and Irrigation M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MOM Management, Operation, and Maintenance NPV Net Present Value O&M Operation and Maintenance PAD Project Appraisal Document PDO Project Development Objective PIM Participatory Irrigation Management PIU Project Implementation Unit RAP Resettlement Action Plan RID Raion Irrigation Department RIDIP Rehabilitation and Completion of Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure Project RSC Regional Support Center RSU Raion WUA Support Unit SAIC State Amelioration and Irrigation Committee WOP Without Project WP With Project WUA Water User Association WUAP Water Users Association Development Support Project Regional Vice President: Cyril E Muller Country Director: Mercy Miyang Tembon Senior Global Practice Director: Jennifer J. Sara Practice Manager: David Michaud Task Team Leader(s): Wilfried Hundertmark ICR Main Contributor: Kazuhiro Yoshida TABLE OF CONTENTS DATA SHEET ......................................................................................................................... 1 I. PROJECT CONTEXT AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES ....................................................... 5 A. CONTEXT AT APPRAISAL .........................................................................................................5 B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DURING IMPLEMENTATION (IF APPLICABLE) .....................................10 II. OUTCOME .................................................................................................................... 11 A. RELEVANCE OF PDOs ............................................................................................................11 B. ACHIEVEMENT OF PDOs (EFFICACY) ......................................................................................12 C. EFFICIENCY ...........................................................................................................................16 D. JUSTIFICATION OF OVERALL OUTCOME RATING ....................................................................18 E. OTHER OUTCOMES AND IMPACTS (IF ANY)............................................................................18 III. KEY FACTORS THAT AFFECTED IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTCOME ................................ 19 A. KEY FACTORS DURING PREPARATION ...................................................................................19 B. KEY FACTORS DURING IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................20 IV. BANK PERFORMANCE, COMPLIANCE ISSUES, AND RISK TO DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME .. 22 A. QUALITY OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) ............................................................22 B. ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND FIDUCIARY COMPLIANCE .....................................................23 C. BANK PERFORMANCE ...........................................................................................................26 D. RISK TO DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME .......................................................................................27 V. LESSONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. 27 ANNEX 1. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND KEY OUTPUTS ........................................................... 29 ANNEX 2. BANK LENDING AND IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT/SUPERVISION ......................... 38 ANNEX 3. PROJECT COST BY COMPONENT ........................................................................... 41 ANNEX 4. EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... 42 ANNEX 5. BORROWER, CO-FINANCIER AND OTHER PARTNER/STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS ... 51 ANNEX 6. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (IF ANY) ..................................................................... 52 ANNEX 7. DETAILS OF THE WUA SITES BENEFITING FROM WUAP INVESTMENTS .................. 53 ANNEX 8. WUA DATA (2017) FROM WUA DATABASE ........................................................... 54 ANNEX 9. PHOTOS ............................................................................................................... 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) DATA SHEET BASIC INFORMATION Product Information Project ID Project Name P107617 Water Users Association Development Support Project Country Financing Instrument Azerbaijan Investment Project Financing Original EA Category Revised EA Category Partial Assessment (B) Partial Assessment (B) Organizations Borrower Implementing Agency Ministry of Finance Amelioration and Irrigation Open Joint Stock Company Project Development Objective (PDO) Original PDO The Project Development Objective is to improve the effectiveness and financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management in the Project area. Page 1 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) FINANCING Original Amount (US$) Revised Amount (US$) Actual Disbursed (US$) World Bank Financing 3,200,000 3,200,000 3,200,000 IBRD-80390 76,800,000 76,800,000 72,664,343 IDA-49130 Total 80,000,000 80,000,000 75,864,343 Non-World Bank Financing Borrower/Recipient 34,300,000 34,300,000 31,907,197 Total 34,300,000 34,300,000 31,907,197 Total Project Cost 114,300,000 114,300,000 107,771,540 KEY DATES Approval Effectiveness MTR Review Original Closing Actual Closing 26-Apr-2011 21-Dec-2011 31-Jul-2014 30-Jun-2016 30-Jun-2018 RESTRUCTURING AND/OR ADDITIONAL FINANCING Date(s) Amount Disbursed (US$M) Key Revisions 27-Jun-2016 69.67 Change in Loan Closing Date(s) 16-Jun-2017 74.48 Change in Loan Closing Date(s) KEY RATINGS Outcome Bank Performance M&E Quality Satisfactory Satisfactory Substantial RATINGS OF PROJECT PERFORMANCE IN ISRs Actual No. Date ISR Archived DO Rating IP Rating Disbursements (US$M) 01 21-Sep-2011 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 0 Page 2 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 02 26-May-2012 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 3.09 03 08-Feb-2013 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 12.22 04 20-Nov-2013 Satisfactory Satisfactory 27.38 05 28-Jun-2014 Satisfactory Satisfactory 41.84 06 09-Dec-2014 Satisfactory Satisfactory 52.99 07 10-Jun-2015 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 60.13 Moderately 08 21-Dec-2015 Moderately Satisfactory 64.53 Unsatisfactory 09 16-Jun-2016 Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 69.67 10 22-Dec-2016 Satisfactory Satisfactory 72.30 11 15-Jun-2017 Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory 74.48 12 16-Jan-2018 Satisfactory Satisfactory 75.87 SECTORS AND THEMES Sectors Major Sector/Sector (%) Agriculture, Fishing and Forestry 84 Irrigation and Drainage 84 Public Administration 16 Sub-National Government 16 Themes Major Theme/ Theme (Level 2)/ Theme (Level 3) (%) Finance 3 Finance for Development 3 Agriculture Finance 3 Public Sector Management 5 Public Administration 5 Municipal Institution Building 5 Page 3 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Urban and Rural Development 45 Rural Development 45 Rural Markets 3 Rural Infrastructure and service delivery 42 Environment and Natural Resource Management 50 Climate change 3 Adaptation 3 Water Resource Management 47 Water Institutions, Policies and Reform 47 ADM STAFF Role At Approval At ICR Regional Vice President: Philippe H. Le Houerou Cyril E Muller Country Director: Asad Alam Mercy Miyang Tembon Senior Global Practice Director: Peter D. Thomson Jennifer J. Sara Practice Manager: Dina Umali-Deininger David Michaud Task Team Leader(s): Pieter David Meerbach Wilfried Hundertmark ICR Contributing Author: Kazuhiro Yoshida Page 4 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) I. PROJECT CONTEXT AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES A. CONTEXT AT APPRAISAL Context Economic Context at Appraisal 1. With the oil and gas boom between 2002 and 2010, Azerbaijan's economy grew significantly and reduced poverty. In 2008, some 16 percent of the population was considered poor, compared to 50 percent in 2001. About 51 percent of Azerbaijan's poor lived in rural areas, with the rural areas accounting for 45 percent of the population. However, with oil and gas reserves being limited, the main challenge of the Government was to diversify the economy and reduce its economic dependence on the oil sector. Traditionally, the agricultural sector has been a main contributor to the economic and social development of Azerbaijan. It was, therefore, not surprising that the Government identified rural and agricultural development as a priority for its economic development plan. Almost all agricultural lands are in semiarid or arid zones, where irrigation is the crucial input for reliable crop production. Deteriorated I&D infrastructure, in particular on-farm I&D, could not provide adequate water supply to the farm holdings. 2. The agriculture sector remained an important source of income and employment for Azerbaijan, despite the spectacular growth of the oil sector since 2005. Approximately 47 percent of the total population lived in rural areas and the sector still provided 36 percent of total employment (State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 2016). Growth in agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) had also been strong, averaging 10.8 percent per year in real terms from 2000 to 2015. Sector growth had thus contributed to both economywide growth and poverty reduction. 1 Despite this strong performance, higher growth in other sectors reduced agriculture’s share of total GDP from 16 percent in 2000 to 6 percent in 2015; and its share of non-oil GDP from 23 percent to 9 percent. Sector Context at Appraisal 3. In 1996, Azerbaijan implemented a land reform that saw the breakdown of previously vast areas of agricultural land into smaller individual farm holdings on smaller land strips. In addition to this, the land strips were often sectioned into smaller parts. Uniform and planned cropping disappeared, to be replaced by a more diversified system of crop production. While traditional crops such as wheat, cotton, barley, and alfalfa remained part of the cropping mix, many farmers started shifting to higher-value crops, including vegetables and horticultural crops. To be successful in these agricultural pursuits, Azerbaijan was entirely reliant on irrigation. The country had an irrigation command area of 1.4 million ha, which was served by more than 51,755 km of irrigation canals. This canal system can be broken down as follows: major canals - 2,184 km, off-farm canals - 8,014 km, and on-farm canals - 41,557 km. While this new cropping pattern fitted well with the division of land, the irrigation and drainage (I&D) sector, which was designed to serve large units of land, struggled to provide the same level of services to the farming sector as before. 1An estimated 5.3 percent of the population was below the poverty line in 2013, of whom 61 percent were in rural areas (The World Bank Group’s Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic 2015). Page 5 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 4. Over the following 20 years, the World Bank supported a fundamental change in the way Azerbaijan manages its irrigation systems. What used to be entirely run by state-owned entities is now in part the responsibility of water user associations (WUAs) and the Amelioration and Irrigation Open Joint Stock Company (AIOJSC). 2 The AIOJSC made great strides in improving infrastructure with recurrent expenditure increasing from about US$6 million in 2000 to about US$295 million in 2009. At the district (‘raion’) level of the AIOJSC, Raion Irrigation Departments (RIDs) supplied bulk water to the WUAs who in turn distributed irrigation water to their members. This water started being distributed in accordance with agreed crop-specific quantities and at prices which were affordable, although they only partially covered the cost of operation and maintenance (O&M). RIDs were also responsible for forming Raion WUA Support Units (RSUs) under the auspices of the Central WUA Support Unit (CSU). In addition, a unit for state supervision was established with the mandate to ensure that WUAs operate in accordance with the Law on Amelioration and Irrigation (LAI). 5. The Government has implemented four major World Bank projects in Azerbaijan in support of water user organizations. In 1997, WUA establishment was started through the Farm Privatization Project (FPP) (P040544). The FPP contained six pilot WUAs. The FPP was followed by the Rehabilitation and Completion of Irrigation and Drainage Infrastructure Project (RIDIP) (P008284). This project focused on the rehabilitation and completion of major off-farm conveyance canals, structures, and collector drains. The Irrigation Distribution System and Management Improvement Project (IDSMIP) (P008286) piloted 22 WUAs on 52,000 ha of irrigated land. By early 2003, an appropriate legal framework was drafted and subsequently approved in June 2004. The amended LAI contained a special chapter consisting of 15 articles regulating the foundation, registration, organization, and supervision of WUAs in Azerbaijan. The law also provided for the transfer in use of the former on-farm irrigation systems to WUAs and for the latter to be supplied with bulk water for irrigation on the basis of long-term (20 year) water supply contracts. The Government promoted the WUA concept and restructured existing WUAs according to the amended law. By the end of the project, the IDSMIP had formed more than 550 WUAs. Measuring structures (hydro-posts) were installed, which allow WUAs to charge water on the basis of actual quantities supplied. The IDSMIP was in turn succeeded by the Water Users Association Development Support Project (WUAP), with an emphasis on achieving on-farm system financial viability and improved management. This US$114.3 million project became effective in December 2011 and had a lifespan of six and a half years until it closed in June 2018. Putting the management of the distribution canals into the hands of WUAs has been considered a major step toward improved service delivery. This new management concept required comprehensive training and substantial investment in upgrading irrigation infrastructure. Theory of Change (Results Chain) 6. With regard to the sector context described earlier, the project aimed at increasing water supply and improving irrigation management through on-farm I&D rehabilitation and institutional strengthening and capacity building. As seen in many cases of irrigation rehabilitation projects, the idea was to link civil works (Component 2) with capacity building (Component 1) assuming that both are interlinked to each other having a synergy effect. Improved management skills for the I&D system and increased water supply were expected to bring about improved effectiveness of on-farm water distribution and management as 2The company was established in 2006 from the State Amelioration and Irrigation Committee (SAIC) and was given the role of providing bulk water supplies to irrigation systems and overseeing the development and management of I&D systems throughout the country. Page 6 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) well as improved financial viability. These are fully founded on principles which the Government adopted and which are firmly aligned with the World Bank’s general approach when it comes to investment support in the I&D subsectors: • First, a strong stakeholder-inclusive consultation before and during implementation of rehabilitation. This is to fully ensure that the proposed project interventions respond to identified priority needs of stakeholders, while recognizing their local knowledge, assessments, and recommendations. • Second, an infrastructure development approach, which primarily targets irrigation schemes where the likelihood of success is highest. The WUAP developed a set of well-defined selection criteria, against which the needs for system rehabilitation and modernization were assessed and WUAs’ performance evaluated. With that, well-performing WUAs were awarded, while WUAs which were not yet selected were given an incentive for doing better. • Third, a well-designed and structured capacity-building program in all aspects of irrigation management covering a range of technical and managerial topics and targeting specific stakeholders, including WUA, farmers, extension staff, as well as staff in charge of construction management and supervision of works. This helps build the management capacities in WUAs, government agencies, and among providers of support services. 7. In the long-term, the improved effectiveness and financial viability of on-farm water distribution and management were expected to have an impact on the economy, social and municipal services, and living conditions as shown in figure 1. Page 7 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Figure 1. Schematic Overview of the Project’s Theory of Change (Results Chain) Note: RSC = Regional Support Center; MOM = management, operation, and maintenance; M&E = monitoring and evaluation; R-WUA = Rehabilitated WUA. Project Development Objectives (PDOs) 8. The PDO of the WUAP is ‘to improve the effectiveness and financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management in the project area’. With this the project focuses on the ‘on-farm irrigation water distribution system’, which includes canal networks, which were formerly managed by kolkhoz/sovkhoz, each with their own brigade for canal O&M. 9. The PDO of the WUAP was fully aligned to the Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) for Azerbaijan for FY11–FY14 3 and the most recent Country Partnership Framework (CPF) for FY16–FY20. 4 While the former identified ‘building a competitive non-oil economy’ (by supporting development of a competitive agricultural sector through improved on-farm I&D management), the latter focused on ‘supporting enhanced competitiveness of agriculture and rural development companies’. The PDO was not changed during project implementation. 3 The World Bank Group’s CPS for Azerbaijan for FY11–FY14. Report No. 56246-AZ. 4 The World Bank Group’s CPF for Azerbaijan for FY16–FY20. Report No. 95860-AZ. Page 8 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 10. Main beneficiaries. The project directly benefitted around 379 WUAs in 27 raions with approximately 330,000 female and 430,000 male water users and farmers who manage and cultivate an area of some 920,000 ha irrigated land. Key Expected Outcomes and Outcome Indicators 11. The project’s key expected outcomes, as stated in the PDOs, consisted of two parts: the aim to improve the effectiveness of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management and the aim to improve financial viability. These outcomes were to be evaluated against the PDO-level indicators. 12. The PDO level indicators were as follows: • PDO Indicator 1. Increase in agricultural productivity (15%) in at least 80% of rehabilitated WUAs 5 on average and relative to non-rehabilitated WUAs 6 in irrigation season following rehabilitation completion (Rehabilitated area, ha). • PDO Indicator 2. Rehabilitated WUA collection rates min 80% which meets 80% of required level of on-farm system MOM two irrigation seasons following rehabilitation completion (Number of rehabilitated WUAs, number). • PDO Indicator 3. Water distribution within 80% of the rehabilitated systems closely matches the crops’ irrigation water norms in the irrigation season following rehabilitation (Number of rehabilitated WUAs, number). • PDO Indicator 4. Project WUA collection rates at least 65% which meets 55% of required level of on-farm system MOM in year following training and capacity building (Number of WUAs in project raions, number). • PDO Indicator 5. % of water users satisfied with WUA managerial and operational performance (Percentage). 13. In addition, the project Results Framework included the World Bank Core Sector Indicators for the irrigation sector, which are given as follows: • Core Indicator 1: Area with improved I&D services (ha) • Core indicator 2: Number of female and male water users provided with improved I&D services (Number of water users) • Core indicator 3: Number of operational WUAs strengthened (Number of WUAs in project raions). 14. The five PDO results indicators were formulated in binominal terms, which means that each indicator was composed of two criteria, one which defined a desirable outcome as a minimum condition 5 WUAs where the project rehabilitated I&D system and provided training. 6 WUAs where the project provided training (but no rehabilitation of the I&D system). Page 9 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) and a second, defining the second minimum condition, by which the first condition must be fulfilled to pass. For example, for PDO indicator 1, the minimum condition is 15 percent higher agricultural output per unit treated (rehabilitated) compared to the agricultural output per unit untreated (not rehabilitated). If the 15 percent condition is found in eight out of ten representative cases, then the respective outcome is considered as a success. If the 15 percent condition is found in less than eight out ten representative cases, then the respective outcome is considered only a partial success. Improved viability of the irrigation distribution system is measured in terms of cost-effectiveness, cost recovery and sustainability of investment, and service delivery. Again, the outcome indicators are set in a similar binominal manner. For example, the irrigation service fee (ISF) collection rates of rehabilitated WUAs must match at least 80 percent of the required level; and this should be found in eight out of ten representative cases. Components 15. The WUAP had three components, with clearly identified component objectives and scope, which are summarized as follows: • Component 1: Institutional Strengthening and Capacity Building (estimated allocation US$16.7 million, actual allocation US$15.9 million). This component aimed at improving the effectiveness of administration and on-farm water management by WUAs in about 27 raions. It included capacity building of AIOJSC, training and capacity building of WUAs, provision of MOM equipment and management and offices for WUAs, strengthening the AIOJSC’s capacity for WUA supervision, and institutional capacity-building studies and pilots. • Component 2: On-farm I&D Rehabilitation (estimated allocation US$89.9 million, actual allocation US$85.9 million). This component assisted the rehabilitation of on-farm I&D infrastructure of eligible WUAs in selected raions. • Component 3: Project Management and M&E (estimated allocation US$7.7 million, actual allocation US$5.8 million). This component supported project management and implementation activities, including M&E. B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES DURING IMPLEMENTATION (IF APPLICABLE) Revised PDOs and Outcome Targets 16. The PDO was not changed during project implementation. Revised PDO Indicators 17. The PDO indicators were not changed during project implementation. Revised Components 18. The components were not changed during project implementation. Page 10 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Other Changes 19. Time extension. The project closing date was extended twice. First, the closing date was extended from June 30, 2016, to June 30, 2017, because of the devaluation of the Azerbaijani manat, there were cost savings of US$7 million which were used to rehabilitate additional irrigated areas. 7 The project was extended to allow for full disbursement of all funds as well as achievement of the project development indicators and the PDO. Second, the closing date was again extended from June 30, 2017, to June 30, 2018. 8 This was for completion of additional rehabilitation areas. Rationale for Changes and Their Implication on the Original Theory of Change 20. The extensions were for completion of institutional strengthening and additional rehabilitation areas. The changes did not affect the PDO and were considered necessary to fully use project funds, including cost savings, and achieve the project development indicators and PDO. II. OUTCOME A. RELEVANCE OF PDOs 21. Alignment with CPF. The WUAP is fully aligned with the focus areas of the CPF for Azerbaijan covering FY16–FY20. Focus Areas 1 and 2 (Economic competitiveness) promote investments in infrastructure for better access to public services and infrastructure for growth. The CPF places special focus on rural development (Focus Area 2) through investments in quality infrastructure that will contribute to enhanced competitiveness of the rural economy. The CPF also focuses on improved human development outcomes and increased prosperity through better access to water (irrigation) and improved quality of the environment. 22. Better access to improved irrigation services is critical for increased agricultural productivity and water use efficiency. This is expected to positively affect social and economic opportunities, especially, in rural areas where the majority of bottom 40 of the population reside. The project supports the Government's commitment in this respect. 23. Alignment with national policies. The Government is implementing the third State Program of Social and Economic Development of Regions for 2014–2018, which aims at reducing regional inequalities and providing households in all raion centers with reliable basic services, such as water and sanitation and other communal services. Assessment of Relevance of PDOs and Rating 7 In 2015, there was a delay with the transfer of 30percent of the Government’s contribution for the civil works, and, as a result, three schemes were scheduled to be completed beyond the original project closing date. The Government was advised to request a six-month extension to finalize rehabilitation work. The payment delay was relating to the 2015 European Games in Baku and further delay was not expected. The final decision of the extension period was one year as explained earlier. 8 In the Restructuring Paper (Report No.RES28549), the task team recommended that the project be extended to April 30, 2018. The Country Director decided to extend it until June 30, 2018, which corresponded to the letter from the Government of Azerbaijan (GoA). This was informed to the Government in the Management Letter dated August 7, 2017 (REF/AZ/WB/230/17). Page 11 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 24. With the alignment of the PDOs to the CPF, the relevance of the PDOs is rated ‘High’. The PDO of the WUAP address well what has been identified as a priority for the I&D subsector development and it combined well the valuable accomplishments and lessons learned from its predecessor projects. Overall, the WUAP is rated to be of high relevance to the current World Bank CPF and GoA priorities. It is fully in line with the state program for poverty reduction and sustainable development and contributes to reduced unemployment and increased productivity in agriculture, which has high potential in boosting non-oil growth. B. ACHIEVEMENT OF PDOs (EFFICACY) 25. The PDO consists of two parts: (1) improve the effectiveness of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management and (2) improve financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management. The project achieved the PDOs according to the agreed indicators. Assessment of Achievement of Each Objective/Outcome 26. PDO#1: improve the effectiveness of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management. The effectiveness of on-farm irrigation distribution and management was determined by comparing the actual irrigation services’ delivery time and frequency with what farmers had requested at the beginning of the season (PDO Indicator 3). The effectiveness of water distribution and management was also determined by the increase of the agricultural productivity (increase by 15 percent in eight out of ten cases) of rehabilitated WUAs, relative to non-rehabilitated WUAs (PDO Indicator 1) and the water user satisfaction (PDO Indicator 5). 9 All targets were achieved or even overachieved. For example, 23 out of 25 rehabilitated WUAs (92 percent) reported that they had received more than 80 percent of the irrigation water volume they had requested. Similarly, 23 out of 25 rehabilitated WUAs showed a 15 percent increase in agricultural output (gross margin), 10 which was equivalent to the total irrigated service area of 71,681 managed by these WUAs. At appraisal, the target was set at 59,200 ha—21 percent more. This increase in agricultural output (gross margin) results in increase in yield, 11 cropping intensity, and share of higher-value crops. The overall farmers’ satisfaction rate was 73.4 percent and clearly exceeded the target which was set at 60 percent. 12 9 When the end-of-project survey was conducted, 25 rehabilitated WUAs could be selected for the survey as the ones which passed two irrigation seasons after the rehabilitation. 10 The average increase of the gross margin of 25 rehabilitated, surveyed WUAs from 2012 to 2016 was US$322 per ha (79 percent increase from the gross margin of 2012), while the average increase of gross margin of 15 non-rehabilitated, surveyed WUAs is US$156 per ha (41 percent increase from the gross margin of 2012). 11 For example, the yield of wheat in 2016 increased compared with the one in 2012 in rehabilitated WUAs as follows: (a) Sabirabad region from 2.7 tons per ha to 2.9 tons per ha; (b) Zardab region from 2.5 tons per ha to 2.7 tons per ha; (c) Guba region from 2.0 tons per ha to 2.5 tons per ha; and (d) Gakh region from 2.5 tons per ha to 2.8 tons per ha. In the meantime, yields of wheat in 2012 and 2016 in non-rehabilitated WUAs were as follows: (a) Sabirabad region 2.4 tons per ha (2012), 2.4 tons per ha (2016); (b) Zardab region 2.5 tons per ha (2012), 2.6 tons per ha (2016); (c) Guba region 2.0 tons per ha (2012), 2.2 tons per ha(2016); and (d) Gakh region 2.4 tons per ha (2012), 2.3 tons per ha(2016). 12 The end-of-project survey was conducted between October and November 2016 and this was supposed to be the final comprehensive survey to see the achievement of the target corresponding to the extended project period until June 30, 2017. Though the project was extended again until June 30, 2018, there was no additional comprehensive survey. The abovementioned explanation of achievement of PDO#1 is based on this survey. Page 12 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Table 1. Increase in Agricultural Productivity Rehabilitated Survey Raion 2016 (AZN per ha) 2012 (AZN per ha) Increase (%) WUAs Sabirabad Ahmadabad 1,296 643 101.6 Sabirabad Moranli 1,256 595 111.3 Sabirabad Ulagali 1,751 730 139.8 Sabirabad Ahiska 1,310 564 132.2 Saatli Fatalikand 1,212 555 118.4 Saatli Alisoltanli 1,083 708 52.8 Saatli Smadakand 919 688 33.6 Imishli R2 1,177 553 113.0 Imishli Araz 1,026 782 31.1 Zerdab Cavar 923 581 58.7 Agjabedi Garadolag 953 534 78.4 Agjabedi Mehrabli 863 465 85.5 Beylagan Bahar 948 557 70.2 Beylagan Dunyamallar 997 539 85.0 Goranboy Veyisli 474 425 11.5 Goranboy Daliozan 571 512 11.4 Goranboy Xangarivand 502 367 37.0 Guba Alekseyevka 3,962 2,443 62.2 Khachmaz Pirquluoba 1,816 1,125 61.4 Qusar Shaghdag 3,408 2,191 55.6 Zakatala Qımır 1,872 961 94.7 Gabala Demiraparan 1,827 632 189.2 Ismayili Qurbanefendi 2,512 1,367 83.8 Gakh Meliarotor 1,824 751 143.0 Balakan Irrigator 2,012 1,128 78.4 Average 81.6 Source: Data from borrower’s end-of-project survey report. Table 2. Satisfaction with Irrigation Service (Percentage of respondents) Criterion Rehabilitated Survey WUAs Non-rehabilitated Survey WUAs Adequacy 84.2 61.9 Timeliness 76.7 52.3 Equity in access 64.9 61.1 Performance of staff 85.4 61.3 Overall satisfaction 81.5 61.1 Source: Data from borrower’s end-of-project survey report. 27. Component 1 strengthened the institutions of AIOJSC and provided training for the CSU, RSUs in 27 raions, RSCs, and WUAs. Training courses included WUA Governance and Administration, WUA Financial Management, Planning of WUA O&M, WUA On-farm Water Management, and WUA On-farm Asset Management. Since 2014, training was provided to three staff of the CSU, 10 staff of RSCs, 82 staff of RSUs, and more than 1,500 members of 379 WUAs. The project adopted layered networking by creating four RSCs to bring together the RSUs in the different regions, provide a better link with the central level Page 13 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) (CSU and Project Implementation Unit [PIU]), and improve M&E. After starting training with individual consultants in 2014, an international company (Suyapi Engineering and Consulting Inc.), which was a design and construction supervision consultant, together with Sulaco Consulting and Engineering as a joint venture, provided training on O&M and associated trainings targeting RSCs and RSU staff, who became trainers of WUAs, in 2015 and 2016. 28. Component 2 financed the rehabilitation of 85,000 ha of on-farm systems managed by about 34 eligible WUAs located in 15 core project raions to strengthen WUAs into mature and sustainable entities. The WUAs eligible for rehabilitation needed to meet a set of eligibility performance and economic criteria. The criteria included benchmarks for (a) commitment to signing the transfer and water use right agreement; (b) establishment and effectiveness of WUA governing bodies; (c) adequate functioning of the WUA representative zones; (d) level and collection of ISF and payment of ISF to the RIDs; and (e) amount of WUA funds allocated to MOM of the systems. WUAs participated in the plan and design phase to reflect opinion and their knowledge and this enabled enhancement of ownership and responsibility for the sustainability of irrigation systems among water users. 29. The construction was well controlled by the consultant and avoided interruption of cultivation as much as possible by setting temporary I&D canals during construction works. In addition, because of the devaluation of the Azerbaijan manat in spring 2016, there were cost savings under Component 2, which were used to rehabilitate additional irrigated areas targeting 5 eligible WUAs (39 WUAs in total). 30. The physical rehabilitations conducted are summarized as follows: (a) Rehabilitation of irrigation canal (2,487 km) • Open canal (2,252 km): canal cleaning (vegetation removal) and restoring design flows (excavation of sediments and reforming section) • Lined canal (236 km) (to reduce seepage) (b) Rehabilitation of drainage channel (915 km) (c) Hydrotechnical works • 7,412 structures (water measurement structure, offtake with check structure, bridge on canal and road crossing, and so on) were constructed and 1,122 structures of existing ones (offtake with pipe passage, bridge, and so on) were rehabilitated. (For details, see annexes 7 and 9.) 31. The works were undertaken under a total of 39 works contracts with a total cost of AZN 72,290,315. 32. PDO#2: improve financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management. The financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management was determined by comparing (a) ISF collection rates of rehabilitated WUAs with the collection rates of non-rehabilitated WUAs and (b) recovery of cost that WUAs had incurred for the MOM of canal networks (PDO Indicator 2). Page 14 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 33. In the case of rehabilitated WUAs, 27 out of the 32 rehabilitated WUAs satisfied the collection rate (80 percent of required level for MOM), exceeding the coverage target of 80 percent by 4 percentage points (two irrigation seasons after completion of rehabilitation). As described earlier, the WUAs were provided training under Component 1, including financial management, planning O&M, on-farm water management, and on-farm asset management. Because of these trainings, the targeted numbers of WUAs could prepare a basic asset management plan, which enabled them to set an ISF at the required level of on-farm system MOM. In addition, improvement in service delivery through rehabilitation (PDO Indicator 3) contributed to enhancing the willingness to pay. 34. The project has increased the financial viability of irrigation schemes in the rehabilitated areas. The O&M cost recovery rate increased from about 10 percent at appraisal to an estimated 50 percent at project completion (for details, see annex4). 35. When considering the collection rate of all the WUAs in the project area, the desired level of 65 percent was actually achieved by 281 WUAs out of a target of 379 WUAs, thereby achieving 74 percent of the target. The desired level of 65 percent collection was likely too ambitious (for details, see annex 8). The improvement still represents a spectacular improvement over the baseline of only 22 WUAs with a collection above 65%. Justification of Overall Efficacy Rating 36. The high levels of determination and commitment of all key actors involved in the implementation of the project have resulted in significant achievement of key results indicators. In addition, increasingly, the roles and responsibilities of WUAs advance beyond the management of irrigation networks. WUAs also fulfill a critical role in rural water management through water resource monitoring of river flows and groundwater levels. Given the substantial achievement of the targets set out in the PDO indicators, and the almost full achievement of the intermediate indicators, the overall efficacy can be rated 'Substantial'. Page 15 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Figure 2. Achievements Against Targets PDO "to improve the effectiveness and financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management in the project area" PDO Indicator 1 (Agricultural productivity in R-WUAs) 121% target achieved PDO Indicator 2 (Collection rate of R-WUAs) 135 % target achieved PDO Indicator 3 (Water distribution matches the need in R-WUAs) 115% target achieved PDO Indicator 4 (Collection rate of Project WUAs) 74% target achieved PDO Indicator 5 (Satisfaction of water users with WUA) 122% target achieved Intermediate Indicator 1 (On-farm I&D infrastructure Intermediate Indicator 2 (implementation of brought back to operational) 139% target achieved O&M procedure) 100% target achieved Intermediate Indicator 3 (Establishment of Representative Zones) 111% target achieved. Intermediate Indicator 4 (WUA office) 90% target achieved. Intermediate Indicator 5 (No of WUAs provided with equipment and business plan) 98% target achieved. Intermediate Indicator 1 (Basic asset management approved by General assembly ) 106% target achieved. C. EFFICIENCY Summary of Financial and Economic Results 37. At appraisal, the ex-ante economic analysis focused on investment in I&D infrastructure. The ex- post economic analysis adopted a similar approach. The ex-ante analysis did not quantify separate benefits for institutional building under Component 1. However, the costs of this component are included in the overall economic analysis (see annex 4). 38. The project achieved agricultural benefits mainly through (a) increase in crop yield for almost all major crops in the project WUAs, (b) increase in cropping area, and (c) changes of cropping patterns favoring high-value crops. The project generated an incremental margin estimated at US$400 per ha representing a 23 percent increase. The economic analysis shows that the overall project was economically justified with an economic internal rate of return (EIRR) of 39 percent (against an appraisal projection of 31 percent) and an economic net present value (ENPV) of US$236 million (against an appraisal projection of US$132 million) for a 12 percent discount rate. The financial results at completion show a financial internal rate of return (FIRR) of 41 percent and a financial net present value (FNPV) of US$296 million for a discount rate of 12 percent. The sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of these results. There was no financial analysis at appraisal. This overachievement is the result of a combination of project design optimization, efficient procurement, and a depreciation of the Azerbaijan manat during implementation that led to substantial savings. 39. The financial and economic analysis results show that the project exhibits a high level of performance even though some benefits could not be accounted for in the cost-benefit analysis (CBA). Those benefits include the following: Page 16 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) • Benefits because of institutional strengthening and capacity building for the WUAs that did not benefit from rehabilitation. Survey results show that those activities allowed non-rehabilitated WUAs to better organize water management and improve the WUAs’ managerial skills. • Broader socioeconomic benefits. A large part of the benefit of the rehabilitation of I&D works go to elderly people, who are often retired and rely mainly on their land for livelihood. The average monthly pension in Azerbaijan as of January 1, 2018, was AZN 208.36 (US$122 per month). The incremental income generated by the project (US$400) provides three to four times this value for one hectare. Administrative Efficiency 40. The project made substantial savings during the initial implementation time frame owing partially to design optimization with the engagement of beneficiaries, competitive procurement, and the depreciation of the Azerbaijan manat. Two proactive restructurings extended the project closing date by 24 months and the project managed to absorb those savings, fully disbursing loan funds while overachieving several targets, including the area to be rehabilitated. The project duration extension resulted in an increase of rehabilitated area by 39 percent compared to the appraisal target. Therefore, the project extension was fully justified and funds were efficiently used. Table 3. Summary of Financial and Economic Results Economic or Financial Indicator Values Financial results FNPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 296,171,703.0 (Discount rate 12 percent) FNPV financial net incremental benefits per ha 2,499.0 (US$/ha) (Discount rate 12 percent) FIRR (Percent) 41.0 Discounted benefit-to-cost ratio (Discount rate 3.8 of 12 percent) Economic results ENPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 236,204,371.0 (Discount rate 12 percent) ENPV financial net incremental benefits per ha 1,993.0 (US$/ha) (Discount rate 12 percent) EIRR (Percent) 39.0 Discounted benefit-to-cost ratio (Discount rate 3.5 of 12 percent) Assessment of Efficiency and Rating 41. The overall efficiency is considered 'High'. The assessment is based on an ex-post economic analysis of the project accounting for 100 percent for project costs. It includes a financial analysis and an economic analysis that corrects price distortion by deducting subsidies and taxes. The overall efficiency assessment also takes into account the administrative efficiency. Page 17 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) D. JUSTIFICATION OF OVERALL OUTCOME RATING Rating: Satisfactory 42. Given the ‘High’ relevance of objective, ‘Substantial’ efficacy, and ‘High’ efficiency, the overall outcome rating is ‘Satisfactory’. E. OTHER OUTCOMES AND IMPACTS (IF ANY) Gender 43. In the early stage of the project, the PIU cooperated with the preparation of a World Bank study 13 on gender in Azerbaijan. As recommended in the study report, gender issues were included in the training modules as social and gender problems in the WUAs to enhance the role of women in WUAs as local consultants for RSCs and RSUs and then correspondingly for WUAs. The target of number of female water users with improved I&D services (Core Indicator 1) was achieved 100 percent and also the number of women chairpersons increased from one to five during the project period. Institutional Strengthening 44. Component 1 of the project was dedicated to institutional strengthening and capacity building of the AIOJSC and WUAs through establishing RSCs and providing training for the AIOJSC, CSU, RSUs, RSCs, and WUAs. 14 The World Bank support established the importance of institutional strengthening. At the beginning of the project, the RSUs were unwilling to undertake institutional support to WUAs without a project top-up incentive to their state salaries as the work with WUAs was seen as being additional to their normal duties. The World Bank recommended that the client reach an agreement on payment of a small financial incentives to the WUA RSU staff between the AIOJSC and Ministry of Finance. The World Bank team of the third implementation support mission (ISM) in 2014 (June–September 2014) observed that the RSU staff did not understand their role well and recommended that they receive closer coaching by the RSC, CSU, and PIU. This was fixed with an initiative from the AIOJSC’s top management. 15 45. The fact that the Suyapi consulting company worked for both Component 1 and 2 enhanced the synergies between components, specifically, the rehabilitation works and its necessary O&M plans. Suyapi also provided training for WUAs, in which the RSC and RSU staff also participated with the objective that they would take over the delivery of training program in the WUA command areas on a continuous basis (training of trainers). 46. Through project implementation, institutions among the AIOJSC were strengthened to support WUAs in project raions. The rehabilitated WUAs in these raions started taking responsibilities of O&M of on-farm I&D. 13 World Bank 2012. Enhancing the Role of Women in Water User Associations in Azerbaijan. 14 Four RSCs located in Qax, Guba, Sabirabad, and Zardab linking the CSU at the AIOJSC headquarters in Baku and the 27 WUA RSUs co-located with the RID. 15 At the beginning, some RID directors were not supportive of the WUAP capacity-building approach toward the WUAs. Rather, they saw WUAs only as water fee collection agents. This attitude changed following strong interference from the AIOJSC’s chairman. Page 18 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Mobilizing Private Sector Financing 47. Not applicable. Poverty Reduction and Shared Prosperity 48. As shown in paragraph 26 (section II B), the project achieved significant increases in agricultural productivity. This was attained by improved water distribution through rehabilitation of the I&D system combined with improved management of WUAs. As shown in table 1, with rehabilitation the productivity can double. Although, the project did not specifically survey the impact of the project on the poor or bottom 40 percent, previous studies provide strong evidence that establish the link between agricultural productivity on the one hand and inequality and poverty reduction on the other hand in Azerbaijan. 16 Accordingly, the project has an impact on poverty reduction in the long term. Other Unintended Outcomes and Impacts 49. The investments in the rehabilitation of I&D infrastructure resulted in significant reductions in soil salinity and waterlogging in the project area. III. KEY FACTORS THAT AFFECTED IMPLEMENTATION AND OUTCOME A. KEY FACTORS DURING PREPARATION 50. Soundness of background analysis. The project was built upon the successful achievements and lessons learned from its predecessor project, IDSMIP (2003–2010). The IDSMIP showed that rehabilitation of on-farm I&D would bring about a 23 percent increase in yields and an increase of 5,200 ha in rehabilitated irrigated area, with an economic rate of return for investments in I&D rehabilitation of 25 percent. This has been accompanied with shifts to higher-value crops. Farmers have shown a willingness to pay more for the cost of the irrigation service—if it is reliable and results in a shift to higher-value crops. 51. Organizational structure change. Under the IDSMIP, relatively soon after project start, it became apparent that the CSU in Baku was too far from the RSUs and WUAs in the raions and as a result did not provide adequate leadership and guidance for WUA support, as envisioned. To address this weakness, under the WUAP four RSCs were created to bring together the RSUs in the different regions and provide a better link with the PIU WUA coordinator (see figure 3). The RSCs were to work closely with their respective RSUs to ensure that there was a well-planned training program and a system in place for tracking support activities and identifying specific local support requirements. Each RSC had a regional WUA coordinator reporting to a PIU WUA coordinator. This ensured better links between the PIU and the WUA support program and also improved the system for tracking WUA support funds. It provided a better system for M&E. 16According to the World Bank Group’s Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic (2015), productivity growth in the agriculture sector is critical for supporting real income and consumption growth in rural areas, where the poor and bottom 40 are concentrated, and for reducing inequality. Page 19 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Figure 3. Organization of Support System of WUA 52. Government commitment to water user participation in I&D management. From the beginning and following lessons learned from the IDSMIP, the Government recognized that rehabilitation would be a non-sustainable investment if it was not followed by adequate maintenance. It was also recognized that the cost of irrigation system maintenance could no longer be entirely borne by the state. The Government fully committed to the concept of PIM and the role and responsibility that WUAs have in this regard. 53. Adequacy of risk assessment. The project built on the IDSMIP design and implementation mechanisms and the overall risk rating was low and adequate. A medium risk was considered for the funding of the MOM of the drainage system and this was mitigated by ensuring that the agreement of transfer of infrastructure to WUAs for MOM does not include drainage collectors considering the WUAs’ MOM capacity. B. KEY FACTORS DURING IMPLEMENTATION 54. Sound construction control. The design and construction supervision consultants (Suyapi Engineering and Consulting Inc. and Sulaco Consulting and Engineering) provided guidance and professional work that enabled the enhancement of the skills of not only the PIU engineering staff, but also the raion engineering staff and the WUAs. The close control that was exercised on the project costs during the implementation by many contractors is well illustrated by the expenditure profile (figure 4). Page 20 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Figure 4. Comparison of Original Contract Cost Estimate (Base Expenditure) and Actual Cost of Work (Programmed Expenditure) Source: Work Progress Report No.56 for the month of December 2017. 55. During the process of WUAP implementation, the consultants not only established a good design criteria report (finalized in May 2014), but also generated important design construction notes to overcome construction implementation problems related to inadequate understanding of the detailed designs and specifications. Although some problems with construction inevitably occurred, these were carefully explained to the contractors who rectified them before the end of the construction project. Thus, during the one-year maintenance period, no major repair works were necessary with almost all the problems identified in the various ISMs being agreed upon and rectified without delay and before the following mission took place. 56. Delay in Component 1 and improvement after adopting a new approach. The implementation progress of institutional strengthening and capacity building (Component 1) for the first half (three and a half years) of the project made very limited progress. Against this, in mid-October 2015, a new implementation mechanism for the Component 1 was introduced by amending the contract for the engineering consulting services to include training on O&M and associated trainings targeting the RSC and RSU staff who are trainers for WUAs to enhance the synergies between the rehabilitation works and the O&M plans and coordinate each training rather fragmented trainings conducted by individual consultants. The consultancy (Suyapi Engineering and Consulting Inc.) also provided training for WUAs. The training was called ‘re-training program’ or refreshment training. The consultant supervised the development and training works carried out by the RSU. As a result, good progress was observed in WUA development, including the preparation of annual O&M plans and improvements in administration procedures and bookkeeping, since 2016. 57. Additional Financing (AF). The Government and World Bank started discussing about AF in 2013, considering the significant demand of rehabilitation works and the capacity building of more WUAs than the scale which the WUAP and its predecessor project (IDSMIP) were supposed to cover. Based on the Page 21 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) recommendation in the second ISM, the concept of AF was developed aiming for Board approval before June 30, 2014. After a series of discussions, a feasibility study for the proposed AF was implemented based on the Ministry of Economy's request in 2017. However, the AF did not go ahead because of the Government's medium- and long-term public debts management strategy for 2019–2025 which did not envisage AF for the WUAP. IV. BANK PERFORMANCE, COMPLIANCE ISSUES, AND RISK TO DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME A. QUALITY OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) M&E Design 58. The project structure is very clear with clearly specified objectives and indicators that capture outcomes and outputs of the project well. However, operationalizing indicators in the context of an M&E system has been challenging (see earlier explanation of indicator design, paragraph 15). The binominal form of outcome indicators has been subject to several rounds of discussion among the project team members as it posed a considerable challenge to the M&E team in terms of designing a suitable monitoring system. 59. During the midterm review, it was decided to keep the original results framework and monitoring. M&E Implementation 60. The baseline survey (August–October, 2013), midterm review survey (September–October 2014), and end-of-project survey (October–November 2016) were contracted out by Ictimai Ray, a local NGO. The company developed a WUA database, which was used for M&E. The World Bank’s ISM in 2015 raised issues about accuracy of the reported progress of outcome and results indicators and recommended stronger collaboration between the team of engineers, water management specialists, and M&E specialist when developing methods for measuring outcome and result indicators and designing the survey questionnaires. With the assistance of the Suyapi specialists, the PIU succeeded in resolving the M&E system’s issues completely. M&E Utilization 61. Results from the M&E surveys were reported on time and were discussed in meetings with the AIOJSC, PIU, and World Bank and were also used for improvement of M&E itself and project management. The implementation progress of the project’s activities was monitored monthly and results were shown in the quarterly project status reports and project management reports as financial and physical quantities tables; diagrams of actual, original, and revised planned works; monitoring tables on the financial inputs of the implementation program; procurement process (goods and works); and Procurement Plan. While there was no necessity to change targets in most indicators, the targets of intermediate indicators (4 and 5) were found to be not precise but remained unrevised during the implementation. This was justified by the small deviations from the original targets, which would have required restructuring of the project. Page 22 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Justification of Overall Rating of Quality of M&E 62. Considering the comprehensive and thoroughly designed, implemented, and used M&E system, the overall rating of quality of M&E is 'Substantial'. B. ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND FIDUCIARY COMPLIANCE 63. Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01). This policy was triggered because the implementation of the project activities (Component 1 supporting irrigation and drainage systems rehabilitation) was expected to cause certain environmental impacts. The project was assigned an environmental category ‘B’ because the anticipated adverse impacts were not found significant or irreversible and could be successfully addressed through preventive actions or mitigation measures. Because the exact number and location of specific rehabilitation subprojects were not known at project preparation, the borrower developed an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (EMMP) which identified generic impacts of the I&D infrastructure rehabilitation in the project area and specified generic prevention and mitigation measures accordingly. The EMMP set procedures for environmental screening and preparation of site-specific Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) to analyze and assess environmental implications of each subproject on a case-by-case basis. Following the provisions of the EA and EMMP, site-specific EMPs were prepared as part of the subproject proposals, were further included in the construction contracts, and their implementation was supervised by the PIU environmental specialist. The main issues observed in the course of the implementation of subprojects, included inadequate waste management and sanitary and hygienic conditions at the campsites, insufficient wearing of personal protection equipment by workers, and unavailability of all required permits and licenses at the time of the supervision by the World Bank. However, those issues were associated with the performance of individual contractors, not of a systemic nature, and promptly rectified under the close supervision and guidance of the PIU. Thus, the overall environmental safeguard performance was rated 'Satisfactory'. Good practices included satisfactory environmental management of construction sites, use of construction materials only from certified/licensed sources, proper rehabilitation of construction and campsites upon completion of civil works, safe reuse of dredged materials, and avoidance of the cutting of trees and vegetation along the rehabilitated canals. 64. The risk of potential impacts of the project interventions on natural habitats and forests were also analyzed in the framework of the EA and EMMP and the criteria was established to ensure that the rehabilitation of I&D schemes that may result in a potential adverse impact will not be eligible for rehabilitation under the project. Therefore, safeguard policies OP 4.04 'Natural Habitats' and OP 4.36 'Forests' were not triggered. 65. The project did not support the purchase of pesticides; however, it stimulated agricultural recovery, which contributed to the increased use of pesticides. Therefore, Safeguard Policy Pest Management (OP 4.09) was triggered. Impacts associated with the increased use of pesticides were analyzed by the EA and were addressed through customized training program under the capacity-building component. The Integrated Pest Management training program supported delivery of sessions to all project WUAs and covered not only advanced pest management practices (Integrated Pest Management) but also general good environmental management practices in agriculture. Page 23 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 66. Safety of Dams (OP/BP4.37). This policy was triggered because the project financed water supply facilities that draw water from or rely on safety performance of reservoirs formed by five existing upstream dams: Ashig Bayramli Dam and Yeka-khana Dam in Ismailli Raion, Nohrgishlag Dam in Gabala Raion, Safikurd Dam in Goranboy Raion, and Mingechevir Dam in Yevlakh Raion. Based on the official documents provided by the borrower and the site visit check by the World Bank dam safety expert, these five dams are operationally safe. The client hired an independent dam safety expert based on the terms of reference approved by the World Bank. He undertook the safety assessment of the dams, and the overall safety of the dams has been found generally satisfactory. In accordance with the decree which assigned the responsibility for ensuring the dams’ operational safety to the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the recommendations developed by the consultant have been accordingly conveyed to the Ministry of Emergency Situations for further actions. 67. The Samur, Kura, and Araz Rivers, which supply most of the water to the irrigation systems rehabilitated by the project, are international waterways. Therefore, the safeguard policy International Waterway (OP/BP 7.50) was triggered; however, it was confirmed, at the preparation stage, that the project would not have any significant impacts on the quantity or quality of water flowing through these rivers or into the Caspian Sea for two reasons. First, the project design was limited to the rehabilitation of existing irrigation schemes and no new construction of irrigation schemes or extensions was expected. Second, the rehabilitation activities were found to have minimal or no impact on the quantity or quality of water in (upstream or) downstream water bodies. Therefore, as no adverse impacts on the rights of other riparian states on the international waterways were identified, a notification exception was duly issued pursuant to paragraph 7(a) of OP 7.50. The Environmental Monitoring Program confirmed that the irrigation infrastructure improvements did not result in significant increases in either withdrawals from or discharges to the international waterways. 68. Environmental Monitoring Program. The Environmental Monitoring Program lasted four years and covered the entire project area. The program included regular testing of surface and groundwater, within and downstream the project activities, and soil for parameters such as mineralization, concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus, oil products, phenols, pesticides, microbes, biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, salinity, suspended particles (for water), and groundwater level. The tests were taken before and after each subproject implementation at about 50 points in each WUA. The interpretation of the test results demonstrated positive dynamics on salinity, groundwater level (decrease), and mineralization. Under the Environmental Monitoring Program, sediments excavated from the canals (both inflow and outflow) have also been analyzed for their possible utilization. The analyses showed that, because of their chemical composition, the excavated materials were not suitable to be used as fertilizers (humus) but could be used for refilling of pits and for slope leveling. The Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources has been regularly consulted to determine the minimum water flow (which is subject to seasonable variability) to be maintained in the rivers which feed the WUA irrigation networks. The PIU environmental specialist closely supervised the environmental monitoring consultant, assessed the overall environmental situation based on the test results, and duly reported to the PIU management. The results of the monitoring have been Geographic Information System mapped. This supervision discontinued in 2016, when the PIU environmental specialist left the PIU and was not replaced. 69. Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12). The project triggered OP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement at preparation as the location of rehabilitation works was not known. A Resettlement Policy Framework was prepared to guide the preparation of Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) and respective Page 24 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) compensation measures for project-affected people in the event that impacts to private land or property occurred. All rehabilitation works under the project were conducted within the right-of-way of existing canals. Therefore, no resettlement impacts occurred and no RAPs were prepared. Civil work designs were successfully accommodated to avoid impact on crops and trees. Social and resettlement screening (verifying that works occur only on existing canals and do not affect private assets) was conducted by the PIU and WUAs with the participation of farmers in the project areas. Given that no ESMPs were produced, there is no written record of the social screening process. In the first two years of the project, the PIU employed an environmental and social safeguard specialist. This specialist left the PIU in 2016 and was not replaced thereon. Still, given the low risk nature of investments and lack of evidence on any resettlement or negative social impacts, the social safeguard performance was rated Satisfactory throughout the life of the project. 70. Accountability and gender. The capacity development component of the project contributed to improving WUAs’ organization and communication with members, which in turn expanded awareness among water users on their rights and provided greater opportunity to express their voice. WUAs who received training under the project established an irrigation schedule and a system of zone representatives who can more easily communicate with farmers. A training component was dedicated to enhancing the role of women in WUAs. Some WUAs report involving women as zone representatives; however, still women's participation in WUA decision making remains low. 71. Grievance mechanisms. Grievances from the local population were handled locally and remained mostly verbal. While some contractors maintained a written grievance log, these records were not retained by the PIU. In a few cases, grievances were escalated to the PIU: a claim on the project’s impact on private land. The PIU worked with the affected owner to clarify cadastral data and borders of the land plot, after which it was established that works were conducted on public land. In another instance, local residents complained about damages to a local road; the damage was investigated and restored by the contractor. In yet another instance local water users submitted an appeal to the World Bank and the President of Azerbaijan to draw attention to the low quality of works. The case was resolved to the local population’s satisfaction. 72. Fiduciary. The project's overall financial management system can be rated Satisfactory. An integrated project management system was maintained for accounting, financial reporting, and disbursement purposes throughout implementation. The system was well maintained by the respective staff of the PIU and was capable of generating all the necessary accounting data, including quarterly interim financial reports, in a manner acceptable to both project management and the World Bank. The PIU was in compliance with the financial management legal covenants: acceptable financial management and disbursement arrangements were in place, required financial reports were provided on time for respective reporting periods, and the project financial statements audit reports with unmodified audit opinions have been submitted to the World Bank on time as well. 73. Procurement. Procurement in a general manner was conducted in compliance with the provisions of the legal agreement. The overall project procurement performance was rated 'Satisfactory' and the procurement risk rating rated ‘Moderate’. The procurement process of the project has generally complied with the World Bank's procurement procedures. The dedicated procurement specialist was extremely knowledgeable in World Bank procurement procedures and was a true asset to the project. Page 25 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) C. BANK PERFORMANCE Quality at Entry 74. The World Bank spent sufficient resources and time on project preparation to identify the issues involved and ensure that the works proposed in the approach adopted were closely aligned with government objectives. The World Bank teams incorporated relevant lessons from the IDSMIP in the design of the project and ensured that the objectives were fully aligned with the issues highlighted in strategic documents, namely the FY11–FY14 CPS. The World Bank ensured that a team of specialists was mobilized to address all the relevant project aspects, including technical aspects, and social and environmental safeguards. The borrower’s ICR rated the World Bank’s performance on quality at entry ‘Highly Satisfactory’ considering that the World Bank team supported the preparation of the project well, which was closely aligned with the Government objective. Quality of Supervision 75. A total of eight ISMs were conducted by the World Bank during project implementation as were frequent technical visits, including field visits in between ISMs. The first ISM was sent in November 2012, one year after the effectiveness, and found the delay in and lack of adequate implementation progress in Component 1. The turnaround of Component 1 needed to wait until 2015. After this ISM, the World Bank team provided timely and effective advice to counterparts, who ensured satisfactory implementation of the project by quickly addressing issues as they arose. 76. The World Bank further conducted regular ISMs (once a year) with frequent technical and field visits in between ISMs, to construction sites to ensure that effective mechanisms for quality control and compliance with World Bank requirements were in place. The World Bank's multidisciplinary teams (with skills in civil engineering, institutional development, environmental management, social development, financial management, and procurement) reviewed relevant documents before, during, and after ISMs. 77. The missions acted proactively to identify issues and problems that could have jeopardized the achievement of the PDOs or could have resulted in both cost overruns and substandard end products. The Aide Mémoires prepared at the end of each mission were informative, clear, and timely, and identified the issues that needed to be addressed before the next mission. In these respects, the borrower’s ICR rated the World Bank’s performance on quality of supervision ‘Highly Satisfactory’, adding the PIU’s appreciation for back-up support provided by the task team and the country office on the various aspects of project implementation. Justification of Overall Rating of Bank Performance 78. Based on the quality of World Bank performance at entry and at supervision, the overall rating of World Bank performance is ‘Satisfactory’. Page 26 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) D. RISK TO DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME 79. The rehabilitated WUAs can expect a virtuous cycle with increased management capacity and improved water supply through rehabilitation, while the non-rehabilitated WUAs need rehabilitation using either Government budget or external support for their sustainability. 17 80. There is a moderate risk to outcome of improved capacity development for non-rehabilitated WUAs as the benefits arising from the project were significantly lower compared to those 39 WUAs, which benefitted from infrastructure improvements. V. LESSONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 81. Long-term support for WUAs is essential to build sustainable service delivery models. The series of support in water user organizations in Azerbaijan started from 1997 through four major World Bank projects (FPP, RIDIP, IDSMIP, and WUAP). In the last 20 years under these projects, pilot engagements (transfer of management to WUAs), preparation of appropriate legal framework, 18 strengthening of WUA CSUs and RSUs, and establishing and strengthening WUAs were undertaken. The WUA development approach adopted from previous projects and further developed by the WUAP is confirmed to be a highly successful model for the development of the sector. Well-designed institutional support of water management institutions helped restore trust in the institutions. The process of development in WUAs supported by the World Bank in Azerbaijan can be referred to by other projects, especially in the region. 82. Well-defined criteria for selecting participating WUAs and PIM can help develop virtuous improvement circles. I&D projects often suffer from a vicious cycle of inadequate O&M, poor service delivery quality, low agricultural productivity and farm income, and low-cost recovery in I&D. The approach of the WUAP shows the importance of developing a virtuous circle instead. Increased water supply (better service delivery) in rehabilitated WUAs led to increased productivity, which enabled WUA members to pay the ISF. As a result, O&M improved and good service delivery is maintained. To achieve this virtuous circle, the project developed a set of well-defined criteria, including performance of WUAs. The project also involved WUAs from the designing stage to respond to identified priority needs, and during the rehabilitation works to enhance ownership, recognizing the importance of maintenance of the on-farm system by WUAs. This PIM approach was supported inclusively among all key stakeholders with political commitments. The increase in collection rate of the ISF, which is necessary for O&M, shows the effectiveness of this approach. This not only brings success in rehabilitation and its sustainability but also provides incentives to project WUAs to do better. 83. Sound construction control is essential to manage large, decentralized investment programs. The WUAP has demonstrated that complex multiple site construction works can be implemented well in time and managed without major delays. This was achieved by, for example, continued involvement of the WUA chairmen, resulting in minimalized issues, important design construction notes to overcome 17 As written in the borrower’s ICR, the AIOJSC is also aware of the need of rehabilitation. The AIOJSC conducted a feasibility study for it and submitted it to the Cabinet of Ministers; however, its implementation has not been decided yet (see paragraph 57). 18 With the amendment of the LAI in 2004, the WUA was transformed from a limited liability company into a voluntary community association responsible for management of on-farm irrigation systems. The WUAs have the right to set their own WUA ISF to cover all costs of management at the WUA level. Page 27 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) problems, and careful explanation by consultants to contractors who rectified some problems before the end of the construction. This has enabled WUAs to improve irrigation service delivery to their members, who in turn acknowledged the improved services by making timely payments of the ISFs. Timeliness of construction works has also significantly contributed to effective disbursements and use of proceeds from the loan. The positive outcome of the project’s economic analysis is testimony to these contributing factors. 84. Close links among the investment and technical assistance components are important to increase the project’s impact. A relevant lesson for all irrigation projects was the importance to closely link hard (civil works) and soft (training) components at the earlier stage, considering that O&M is based on the rehabilitation. This is very useful for WUA members to understand what benefits the project will bring and what O&M is necessary by linking directly and by seeing the actual system, which makes it easier for them to understand. This link was strengthened by the involvement of RID and RSU staff in training sessions. The staff received copies of design reports, including O&M plan of respective project areas, which enabled them to support the WUAs well. 85. External factors such as climate change can threaten the achievements of irrigation projects and should be considered as part of project design. As climate change in Azerbaijan continues to add pressure on water resources, the Government is implementing an ambitious water resource development program adding storage and several large irrigation canals. However, to what extent the secondary I&D infrastructure will be further developed will largely depend on the priorities that the Government will place on the development of irrigated agriculture in rural areas. A key question will be how economic benefits generated from water use in agriculture compare to those generated by other sectors. The National Water Resource Strategy of Azerbaijan sets a long-term goal, focusing on ‘sustainability and efficiency of water supplies to respective sectors, meeting environmental requirements while maximizing economic benefits’. If the I&D programs are implemented as planned, secure water supplies can only be met if adjustments are made beyond the secondary system level, including the entire water management systems. Such adjustments may include optimization of reservoir management, more efficient water conveyance and distribution, as well as a shift toward adoption of advanced irrigation technology. Because WUAs are now well-established institutions in Azerbaijan their responsibilities may well be expanded, thus making them a preferred partner for local water resource management and water managers alike. . . Page 28 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 1. RESULTS FRAMEWORK AND KEY OUTPUTS A. RESULTS INDICATORS A.1 PDO Indicators Objective/Outcome: improve the effectiveness of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Indicator 1: Increase in Hectare(Ha) 0.00 59200.00 71681.00 agricultural productivity (15%) in at least 80% of 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 rehabilitated WUAs on average and relative to non- rehabilitated WUAsin irrigation seasonfollowing rehabilitation completion. Comments (achievements against targets): 121% target achieved. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Indicator 3: Water Number 0.00 30.00 23.00 Page 29 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) distribution within 80% of the 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 rehabilitated systems closely matches the crops irrigation water norms in the irrigation season following rehabilitation. Comments (achievements against targets): Achieved the target written in the indicator as follows: In the sampling survey of the End-of-Project Survey, 92.9% of farmers received more than 80 % of the irrigation water they expected. 92.9% of farmers is equivalent to 23 rehabilitated WUAs among 25 rehabilitated WUAs which were surveyed in the End-of-Project Survey (92%). This % exceeds the coverage target (80%), by 15% point. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Indicator 5: % of water users Percentage 20.00 60.00 73.00 satisfied with WUA managerial and operational 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 performance. Comments (achievements against targets): 122% target achieved . Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Core Indicator 1: Area with Hectare(Ha) 53000.00 900000.00 920274.00 improved I&D services 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 Comments (achievements against targets): 102% target achieved. Page 30 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Core indicator 2:Number of Number 20000.00 330000.00 330873.00 female water users provided with improved I&D services 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 Comments (achievements against targets): 100% target achieved. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Core indicator 2:Number of Number 25000.00 430000.00 430016.00 male water users provided with improved I&D services 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 Comments (achievements against targets): 100% target achieved. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Core indicator 3:Number of Number 208.00 379.00 379.00 operational WUAs strengthened. 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 Comments (achievements against targets): 100% target achieved. Objective/Outcome: improve financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management Page 31 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Indicator 2: Rehabilitated Number 0.00 20.00 27.00 WUA collection rates min 80% which meets 80% of 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 required level of on-farm system MOM two irrigation seasons following rehabilitation completion. Comments (achievements against targets): 135% target achieved. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Indicator 4: Project WUA Number 22.00 379.00 281.00 collection rates at least 65% which meets 55% of required 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 level of on-farm system MOM in year following training and capacity building. Comments (achievements against targets): 74 % target achieved. A.2 Intermediate Results Indicators Component: Component One: Institutional and WUA capacity strengthening Page 32 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Intermediate Result indicator Number 22.00 340.00 361.00 1: Number of WUAs where basic asset management 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 plans are prepared, approved by the WUA Representative/General Assembly and contributing to the setting of the ISF. Comments (achievements against targets): 106% target achieved. Component: Component Two: I & D Rehabilitation Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Intermediate Result indicator Hectare(Ha) 0.00 85000.00 118510.00 1: On-farm I&D infrastructure brought back 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 to operational condition Comments (achievements against targets): 139% target achieved. Component: Component Three: Project Management Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Page 33 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Intermediate Result indicator Text satisfactory Satisfactory Satisfactory 1: Project management capacity in PIU enhanced and 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 project implementation schedule adhered to Comments (achievements against targets): Achieved. Unlinked Indicators Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Intermediate Result indicator Number 22.00 340.00 340.00 2: Number of WUAs with adequate number of trained 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 and experienced staff implementing good operation and maintenance procedures. Comments (achievements against targets): 100% target achieved. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Intermediate Result indicator Number 22.00 340.00 379.00 3: Number of WUAs with properly established 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 Representative Zones with Page 34 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) water users actively engaging in WUA management through their Zonal Representatives. Comments (achievements against targets): 111% target achieved. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Intermediate Result indicator Number 22.00 222.00 200.00 4: Number of WUAs with proper offices. 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 Comments (achievements against targets): 90 % target achieved. Target should have been corrected to 200 as reasonable and attainable one. Formally Revised Actual Achieved at Indicator Name Unit of Measure Baseline Original Target Target Completion Intermediate Result indicator Number 0.00 90.00 88.00 5: Number of WUAs with business plan and provided 01-Sep-2011 22-Mar-2011 30-Jun-2018 with equipment Comments (achievements against targets): 98 % target achieved. This was caused from the necessity of transferring money to fill the shortage of budget of office. Target should have been corrected to 88 as reasonable and attainable one. Page 35 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) B. KEY OUTPUTS BY COMPONENT Objective/Outcome 1 improve the effectiveness of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management 1. Increase in agricultural productivity (15%) in at least 80% of rehabilitated WUAs on average and relative to non-rehabilitated WUAs in irrigation season following rehabilitation completion. 2. Water distribution within 80% of the rehabilitated systems closely Outcome Indicators matches the crops irrigation water norms in the irrigation season following rehabilitation. 3. % of water users satisfied with WUA managerial and operational performance. Component 1 1. Number of WUAs with adequate number of trained and experienced staff implementing good operation and maintenance procedures. 2. Number of WUAs with properly established Representative Zones Intermediate Results Indicators with water users actively engaging in WUA management through their Zonal Representatives. 3. Number of WUAs with business plan and provided with equipment Component 2 4. On-farm I&D infrastructure brought back to operational condition Component 1 Training was provided to 3 staff of CSU, 10 staff of RSCs, 82 staff of RSUs, and more than 1,500 members of 379 WUAs. 198 WUAs offices were constructed and computer and printers for 364 WUAs and 88 Key Outputs by Component excavators were provided. Through these, the results of the (linked to the achievement of the Objective/Outcome 1) Intermediate Results Indicators are as follows: 1. 340 WUAs achieved, 100% target. 2. 379 WUAs achieved, compared to target 340. 3. 88 WUAs achieved, compared to target 90. Page 36 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Component 2 Irrigation canal (2,487 km) and drainage channel (915 km) were rehabilitated. Hydraulic structures were constructed (7,412 structures) and rehabilitated (1,122 structures). The result of the Intermediate Results Indicator is as follows: 4. 118,510 ha achieved, compared to target 85,000 ha. Objective/Outcome 2 improve financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management 1. Rehabilitated WUA collection rates min 80% which meets 80% of required level of on-farm system MOM two irrigation seasons following rehabilitation completion. Outcome Indicators 2. Project WUA collection rates at least 65% which meets 55% of required level of on-farm system MOM in year following training and capacity building. Component 1 1. Number of WUAs where basic asset management plans are Intermediate Results Indicators prepared, approved by the WUA Representative/General Assembly and contributing to the setting of the ISF. 2. Number of WUAs with proper offices. Component 1 Key Outputs by Component 1. 340 WUAs achieved, 100% target. (linked to the achievement of the Objective/Outcome 2) 2. 200 WUAs achieved, compared to target 222. Page 37 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 2. BANK LENDING AND IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT/SUPERVISION A. TASK TEAM MEMBERS Name Role Preparation David Meerbach Team Leader/Water Resources Specialist Sari Soderstrom Lead Operations Officer Hyacinth Brown Senior Finance Officer Erie Brusberg Lead Social Development Specialist Rufiz Chirag-Zade Senior Operations Officer Norpulat Daniyarov Financial Management Specialist Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist Sabina Majidova Team Assistant Nishesh Mehta Junior Professional Associate Hiwote Tadesse Senior Program Assistant I.U.B Reddy Senior Social Development Specialist Ghada Youness Senior Legal Counsel Ximing Zhang Water Resources Specialist David Colbert Senior Environmental Specialist Kunduz Masylkanova Agricultural Economist Alexandra Sokolova Economist (Consultant) Stephen Hodgson Water Legal Specialist (Consultant) Tim Jackson Irrigation Civil Engineer Sam Johnson WUA and Institutional Specialist (Consultant) Jesus Renzoli Procurement Specialist (Consultant) Sabina Rustamova Social Specialist (Consultant) Douglas Vermillion Irrigation Specialist (Consultant) Supervision/ICR Wilfried Hundertmark Task Team Leader(s) Armine Aydinyan, Sandro Nozadze, Tanvir Hossain Procurement Specialist(s) Page 38 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Tural Jamalov Financial Management Specialist Ama Esson Team Member Rufiz Vakhid Chirag-Zade Team Member Gulana Enar Hajiyeva Environmental Safeguards Specialist Satoshi Ishihara Social Safeguards Specialist Pieter David Meerbach Team Member Kazuhiro Yoshida Senior Irrigation and Drainage Specialist, ICR Main Contributor Sophia V. Georgieva Social Safeguards Specialist Sabina Vagif Majidova Team Member Yoro Sidibe Water Resources Management Specialist, ICR Economist Avjeet Singh Senior Operations Officer Ntombie Z. Siwale Team Member Sylvie Ngo-Bodog Team Member B. STAFF TIME AND COST Staff Time and Cost Stage of Project Cycle No. of staff weeks US$ (including travel and consultant costs) Preparation FY08 0 1,598.84 FY10 6.826 83,189.40 FY11 33.432 182,844.50 FY12 0 - 75.92 Total 40.26 267,556.82 Supervision/ICR FY12 12.880 104,773.93 FY13 25.515 118,842.26 FY14 13.237 64,340.32 FY15 10.365 66,390.83 Page 39 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) FY16 11.952 88,709.46 FY17 12.600 83,545.19 FY18 37.763 259,763.03 FY19 17.438 104,899.07 Total 141.75 891,264.09 Page 40 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 3. PROJECT COST BY COMPONENT Components Amount at Approval Actual at Project Percentage of Approval (US$, millions) Closing (US$, (US$, millions) millions) Component 1: Institutional Strengthening and Capacity 16.7 15.9 95.2 Building Component 2: On-farm I&D 89.9 85.9 95.6 Rehabilitation Component 3: Project 7.7 5.8 75 Management and M&E Total 114.3 107.6 94.1 Page 41 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 4. EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS Introduction 1. The objective of the economic and financial analysis is to evaluate the ex post economic and financial returns of the WUAP at project completion in 2018. The project total costs were estimated at US$114.30 million equivalent at appraisal, including contributions from IDA, IBRD, and the GoA. The project was completed with US$107.68 million. The difference between the appraisal estimate and completion value can be explained by variations in SDR value and by substantial cost savings that allowed the project to expand beyond its initial scope. The PDO was to improve the effectiveness and financial viability of on-farm irrigation water distribution and management in the project area. The PDO was achieved through capacity building and support to eligible WUAs, CSUs, RSUs, the AIOJSC, and through rehabilitation of on-farm I&D infrastructure. The PDO was not revised during project implementation. 2. The PDO was achieved through (a) Institutional strengthening and capacity building which financed institutional strengthening and capacity building of the AIOJSC, CSUs, RSUs in 27 raions, and RSCs; rehabilitation and construction of offices of the RSCs; capacity building and provision of O&M equipment and management facilities to eligible WUAs; strengthening capacity of the AIOJSC for state supervision of the activities of the WUAs; and preparation of selected studies, research, and demonstration pilots in I&D, integrated water resource management, and related institutional areas; (b) On-farm I&D rehabilitation, which will finance rehabilitation of on-farm systems for about 34 eligible WUAs in 15 raions and selected irrigated areas with agricultural production potential; and (c) Project management, M&E, and financing project management and implementation activities, including M&E by a PIU established within the AIOJSC. 3. At appraisal, the analysis estimated that the financial and economic returns to farm households and the economy will likely benefit from investments in I&D infrastructure. It was expected that benefits to the farm households would to be derived from (a) improved yields, (b) increased area of irrigated land, (c) improved cropping patterns with increased share of lucrative cash crops, and (d) improved capacity for I&D water management. The project was anticipated to generate net incremental economic benefits with an EIRR of 31 percent and an ENPV of US$132 million. Methodology of the ICR Economic Analysis 4. The project design and objective set at appraisal remained unchanged through project completion. However, the project underwent two restructurings that cumulatively extended the closing date by 24 months. The first restructuring 19 extended the closing date from June 30, 2016, to June 30, 2017, and the second extended the closing date from June 30, 2017, to June 30, 2018. Therefore, the ex 19 Report No: RES24204. Page 42 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) post analysis takes into account the additional 24 months that were granted. The ex post benefits and costs are assessed following the appraisal methodology, but by considering the actual rehabilitated areas, changes in cropping patterns and yields, and project costs and revising assumptions on future yields and cropping patterns beyond project completion. Economic and financial benefits are estimated as incremental variation between the ‘with project’ (WP) scenario and the ‘without project’ (WOP) scenario over the 25-year project life. To ensure meaningful comparison with appraisal results, a discount rate of 12 percent was used in the analysis. However, the results are also presented for discount rates of 10 percent and 12 percent. The sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the robustness of the results in relation to the key variables that may be subject to some level of uncertainty over time. 5. The analysis mainly builds on the results of the initial and final surveys conducted in 2012 and at the end of 2016 where the bulk of rehabilitation works were completed. The surveys collected comprehensive information on the WUAs and their members, socioeconomic characteristics of farm households, agricultural production technology, and output and input prices in the project areas. The surveys covered two types of WUAs: (a) WUAs that benefited from project rehabilitation and capacity- building activities and (b) WUAs that benefited just from capacity building (control WUAs). As such the survey results allow the economic benefit of rehabilitation works to be assessed. Because almost all the WUAs in the project areas benefited at least from capacity building, the surveys could not identify comparable WUAs that did not benefit from any project intervention. Therefore, the analysis conservatively included only the benefits derived from rehabilitation works although capacity building could also result in additional benefits. The surveys provided agroeconomic data covering different agroecological regions for Sabirabad region, Zardab region, Guba region, and Gakh region. The data collected were fed into the economic and financial analysis. 6. The financial analysis uses 2011 constant prices for all inputs and outputs for the entire project period, except for the ISF. At appraisal, the baseline average ISF for I&D in the project WUAs were estimated at AZN 0.5 per 1,000 m3, which was insufficient to adequately cover O&M of I&D infrastructure; however, because of the project activities, specifically (a) supporting WUAs to improve their institutional, managerial, and technical capacities and (b) improving farmers’ awareness resulted in increase in ISF rates and substantial increase in the willingness to pay for it. At closing in 2018, the average ISF was estimated at AZN 2.7 per 1,000 m3, representing a fivefold increase. This corresponds to a per area rate of AZN 10.3 per ha. The full O&M cost recovery expense is estimated at AZN 5 per 1,000 m3. This implies that the O&M cost recovery rate increased from about 10 percent at appraisal to an estimated 50 percent at project completion. 7. The CBA assesses the stream of benefits and costs over the project horizon in the WP and WOP scenarios. The WP scenario builds on a survey conducted in the rehabilitated WUAs before and after rehabilitation works, while the WOP scenario builds on a survey conducted in the non-rehabilitated WUAs during the same period. Benefits consider the incremental incomes from agricultural activities for different types of crops (cereals, vegetables, fruits, pasture) in the WOP and WP scenarios. The project costs take into account the investment costs and the recurring costs mainly because of O&M. In the economic analysis, the financial prices were converted into economic prices by removing taxes and subsidies from input and output prices. Page 43 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) I&D Infrastructure Rehabilitation 8. At appraisal, the project projected support to 34 WUAs with the rehabilitation of I&D infrastructure over 85,000 ha. At completion, the project managed to rehabilitate up to 118,510 ha representing 139 percent of the target value because of savings. These savings were made possible because of several factors. First, the depreciation of the Azerbaijan manat compared to SDR allowed the procurement of relatively cheap construction materials. 20 Second, several improvements made to the initial infrastructure designs with the participation of WUAs resulted in costs optimization. Finally, ensuring competitive procurement helped obtain favorable offers. At appraisal, the rehabilitation costs were estimated at US$1,057 per ha. At completion, the rehabilitation costs were US$725 per ha. Project Benefits 9. The project generated significant benefits increasing irrigation farmers’ net margin. The rehabilitation works allowed for increased and reliable supply of irrigation water and the capacity building of WUAs contributed to enhanced management of I&D infrastructure. The improved water supply contributed to enhanced revenues through different channels, including (a) increase in crop yield for almost all major crops in the project WUAs, (b) increase in cropping area, and (c) changes of cropping pattern favoring high-value crops. 10. Change in crop yields. The survey results indicate a noticeable increase in yield for the same crops in rehabilitated schemes compared to non-rehabilitated schemes. The bulk of the rehabilitation works were completed in 2016/2017; thus, the survey does not provide information on the full potential of the achievable yields because of the improved timeliness and efficiency of irrigation water delivery. However, based on yield improvements achieved in the rehabilitated areas in the first and the second seasons after the rehabilitation completion, the analysis conservatively assumes that the latest recorded yield will continue over the project lifetime with no further yield increase. The major crops yields are summarized in table 4.1. Table 4.1. Yield Variations in Rehabilitated and Non-rehabilitated Areas Sabirabad Zardab Guba Gakh WP WOP WP WOP WP WOP WP WOP Wheat (%) 15.21 1.67 8.06 2.81 14.00 5.00 16.00 0.00 Fodder (%) 14.75 –3.17 6.32 –7.80 17.00 4.00 21.00 –7.00 Fruits (%) 25.81 –1.66 10.00 3.00 24.00 –2.00 27.00 8.00 Vegetables (%) 19.52 2.04 16.63 7.62 21.00 –8.00 29.00 –4.00 Cotton (%) 34.28 27.89 19.09 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 35.00 Water melon (%) 22.70 1.85 23.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 Maize grain (%) 24.33 4.89 20.83 0.00 37.00 0.00 21.00 7.00 Hazelnut (%) 23.64 –5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 11. Variation in copping areas. The survey indicates an important increase in the area under irrigation in both rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated areas. However, the rehabilitated areas experience a much higher increase in area under cultivation. It is conservatively assumed that there was no further increase 20 In February 2011, at project appraisal SDR 1 = AZN 1.235, while at completion in June 2018, SDR 1 = AZN 2.439. Page 44 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) in areas under cultivation beyond project closing. Table 4.2 shows the relative share of land under different types of crops in the WP and the WOP scenarios. 12. Improvement in cropping intensity. The survey highlights a change in cropping intensity in different WUAs and for different crops. Cropping intensity is at least 2 and reaching 3 for some types of crops varieties with short cycles. The analysis conservatively assumes a cropping intensity of 2. 13. Shift to more profitable crops. As shown in the survey results, the project areas experienced substantial changes in cropping patters in favor of higher-value crops, especially in rehabilitated areas. The non-rehabilitated areas also experienced the same trend but to a lesser extent. This change in pattern was fostered by the improvement of the reliability in water supply which provided opportunities for vegetable crops. The cropping pattern observed in 2017 was conservatively assumed over the remaining project life. The cropping patterns are summarized in table 4.2. Table 4.2. Cropping Patterns Assumptions by Regions Sabirabad Zardab Guba Gakh WP WOP WP WOP WP WOP WP WOP Wheat (%) 33.6 37.5 25.9 31.0 31.6 37.0 24.6 28.9 Maize (%) 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 8.9 9.8 Cotton (%) 7.3 8.6 2.5 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sugar beet (%) 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Melons (%) 4.5 3.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Vegetables (%) 3.6 4.4 5.8 3.7 10.5 2.8 11.9 14.0 Alfalfa (%) 40.6 36.0 50.8 57.7 6.5 4.5 14.1 13.9 Fruit (Apple) (%) 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.6 31.5 36.7 11.6 5.6 HG=Fruit (Apple) 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 10.9 2.2 0.0 0.0 (%) Maize silage (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.0 HG=Maize silage 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (%) HG=Vegetables 7.0 6.8 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (%) Pasture (%) 1.7 2.4 10.3 1.3 0.5 2.8 16.2 14.9 Other crops (%) 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.4 8.3 13.5 12.0 12.9 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100 100.0 Note: HG = House Garden. Project Costs 14. This analysis considers different costs associated with the project. First, it accounts for all the investment costs, including capacity building, investment costs, and coordination costs. These costs were estimated at US$107.68 million. Project costs also conservatively assume that O&M costs will represent up to 5 percent of investment costs over the lifetime of the project. Results of the CBA Page 45 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 15. Financial returns to the farm households. The investments in the rehabilitation of the I&D infrastructure generate an incremental gross margin to farm households estimated at US$400 per ha compared to non-rehabilitated areas over a horizon of 20 years. The FIRR is estimated at 41 percent and the FNPV is estimated at US$226.4 million at a discount rate of 10 percent. The benefit-to-cost ratio is estimated at 3.8. The results are summarized in table 4.3. Table 4.3. Results of the CBA - Financial Results Economic and Financial Indicators ICR Values Incremental gross margin (US$/ha) 400 FNPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 296,171,703 (Discount rate 12 percent) FNPV financial net incremental benefits per ha 2,499 (US$/ha) (discount rate 12 percent) FNPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 384,821,031 (Discount rate 10 percent) FNPV financial net incremental benefits per ha 3,247 (US$/ha) (Discount rate 10 percent) FNPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 504,218,181 (Discount rate 8 percent) FNPV financial net incremental benefits per ha 4,255 (US$/ha) (Discount rate 8 percent) FIRR (Percent) 41 Discounted benefit-to-cost ratio (Discount rate of 12 3.8 percent) 16. The economic analysis shows that the component generates an EIRR of 39 percent and an ENPV of US$181.3 million at a discount rate of 10 percent. The benefit-to-cost ratio is estimated at 3.5 as shown in table 4.4. Table 4.4. Results of the CBA - Economic Results Economic and Financial Indicators ICR Values ENPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 236,204,371 (discount rate 12 percent) ENPV financial net incremental benefits per hectare 1,993 (US$/ha) (discount rate 12 percent) ENPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 308,200,206 (Discount rate 10 percent) ENPV Financial net incremental benefits per ha 2,601 (US$/ha) (Discount rate 10 percent) ENPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) 405,253,683 (Discount rate 8 percent) ENPV financial net incremental benefits per ha 3,420 (US$/ha) (Discount rate 8 percent) EIRR (Percent) 39 Discounted benefit-to-cost ratio (Discount rate of 12 3.5 percent) Page 46 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Cost Recovery and Sustainability 17. To assess the potential for cost recovery and sustainability, the analysis estimates the impact of various levels of the ISF rate on the farm household budgets. The ISF rate comprises costs to cover (a) WUAs’ overhead costs, (b) O&M of on-farm systems, and (c) equity contribution to rehabilitation. The average rehabilitation costs are estimated at US$725 per ha. Assuming a repayment period of 10 years, the results present the impact of full O&M cost recovery and options for partial equity contribution (0 percent, 10 percent, and 15 percent) on the average farmer’s margin. The results suggest that O&M costs recovery and partial contribution to equity should be affordable for farmers. Table 4.5. ISF Calculation under Various Cost Recovery Options Options for O&M Cost ISF (US$/ha) As Percentage of Net As Percentage of Net Recovery Incremental Margin of Margin of Farm Farm Current levels 6.06 1.52 0.34 Required for full O&M 12.60 3.15 0.71 cost recovery Required for full O&M 19.79 4.95 1.12 cost recovery and 10 percent of rehabilitation cost Required for full O&M 23.39 5.85 1.32 cost recovery and 15 percent of rehabilitation cost Sensitivity Analysis of the Project Results 18. To assess the robustness of the results, a sensitivity analysis was performed on key variables, including cropping intensity, in the project areas. The analysis tests the impact of a 10 percent to 50 percent decrease in the cropping intensity on the EIRR starting from 2019. The results are shown in table 4.5. Table 4.6. Results of Sensitivity Analysis - Economic Results Assumptions for Sensitivity Analysis ICR Values EIRR for 10 percent decrease in benefits (percent) 36 EIRR for 20 percent decrease in benefits (percent) 33 EIRR for 30 percent decrease in benefits (percent) 30 EIRR for 40 percent decrease in benefits (percent) 26 EIRR for 50 percent decrease in benefits (percent) 22 19. The economic results are robust to changes in the cropping intensity. Variations in cropping intensity have only a slight impact on the EIRR. The project remains economically justified even for a cropping intensity reduced by 50 percent. The results are presented in table 4.6. Page 47 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) Summary of Financial and Economic Results 20. The financial and economic analysis results show that the project exhibits a high level of performance even though some benefits could not be accounted for in the CBA. Those benefits include the following: (a) Benefits because of institutional strengthening and capacity building for the WUAs that did not benefit from rehabilitation. Survey results show that those activities allowed the non-rehabilitated WUAs to better organize water management and improve the WUAs’ managerial skills. (b) Broader socioeconomic benefits. A large part of the benefit of the rehabilitation of I&D works go to elderly people, who are often retired and rely mainly on their land for livelihood. The average monthly pension in Azerbaijan manat as of January 1, 2018, was AZN 208.36 (USD122 per month). The incremental income generated by the project (US$400) provides three to four times this value for one hectare. Table 4.7. Summary of Financial and Economic Results Economic or Financial Indicator Values Financial Results FNPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) (discount rate 12 296,171,703 percent) FNPV financial net incremental benefits per ha (US$/ha) (discount 2,499 rate 12 percent) FIRR (Percent) 41 Discounted benefit-to-cost ratio (discount rate of 12 percent) 3.8 Economic Results ENPV financial net incremental benefits (US$) (discount rate 12 236,204,371 percent) ENPV financial net incremental benefits per ha (US$/ha) (discount 1,993 rate 12 percent) EIRR (Percent) 39 Discounted benefit-to-cost ratio (discount rate of 12 percent) 3.5 Comparison of the Appraisal and ICR Analyses 21. Similar approaches were used in conducting economic and financial analysis of the project at appraisal and completion stages. The results show that the project performed slightly better at completion, with an EIRR of 39 percent, than projected at appraisal, with an EIRR of 31 percent. Various factors explain the differences between the economic results at appraisal and completion. First, the rehabilitated area at completion exceeded what was planned at appraisal by about 40 percent. This performance was possible because of efficient procurement, design optimization during implementation, and depreciation of the Azerbaijan manat leading to substantial savings. Additionally, the yields achieved exceeded expectations at appraisal. At appraisal, the average yield increase was estimated at 23 percent compared to the non-rehabilitated areas. At completion, the actual achievement was close to 30 percent. Finally, shifts in cropping patterns contributed to emphasizing high-value vegetable and fruit crops, Page 48 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) providing opportunities for increased agricultural income. The assumptions and financial indicators used in the appraisal and the current analyses are summarized in table 4.8. Table 4.8. Summary of Results and Assumptions Adopted by the Appraisal and ICR Analyses Key Assumptions Appraisal ICR Total area for rehabilitation (ha) 85,000 118,510 Number of WUAs benefiting from 34 39 rehabilitation Total ENPV (US$, millions) 132 236 EIRR (%) 31 39 Total FNPV (US$) n.a. 41 Per area ENPV (US$/ha) 1,553 1,993 Per area FNPV (US$/ha) n.a. 2,499 Table 4.9. Overview of Main Assumptions Used in the CBA No. Description Value Unit Source Overall Assumption 1. Discount rate 8 to 12 Percent World Bank recommendation 2. Exchange rate 1.7 https://www.xe.com, accessed on September 25, US$/AZN in 2018 2018. 3. Project horizon 25 years Years Similar project CBA Analysis (2011– 2036) 4. Inflation rates From Percent https://www.statista.com accessed on September 25, 1.09% to 2018. 12.56% (Between 2012 and 2016) 5. Pension 208.36 Manat/Month https://www.azernews.az/business/126976.html Cost Assumption 6. Investment costs 107.68 US$ Project financial documents million 7. Annual O&M 5 Percent Team estimate based on similar irrigation projects costs 8. Annual O&M 5 AZN/1,000 m3 ICR IDSMIP costs as it relates to ISF Benefit Assumption 9. Project 118,510 Ha Project M&E document rehabilitated area in June 2018 10. Cropping 2 Survey with beneficiaries 2012 and 2016 intensity 11. Cropping patterns See Survey with beneficiaries 2012 and 2016 and input and summary output prices in previous Page 49 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) No. Description Value Unit Source tables and details in survey report Page 50 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 5. BORROWER, CO-FINANCIER AND OTHER PARTNER/STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS December 12, 2018 Azerbaijan Amelioration and Irrigation, OJSC Ms. Saida Bagirli Acting Country Manager Baku, Azerbaijan Dear Saida Bagirli, This is to inform you that we have reviewed the letter dated November 27, 2018 and Draft Implementation Completion and Results Report (ICR) for Water Users’ Association Development Support Project, prepared by the World Bank, and have no comments or suggestions concerning the above-mentioned. Sincerely, Mammadsadig Guliyev First Deputy Chairman Page 51 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 6. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (IF ANY) • Project Appraisal Document • Aide Mémoires of Implementation Support Missions 2012–2018 • Implementation Status and Results Reports 2012–2018 • Restructuring Papers • Borrower’s Project Completion Report • End-of-project Survey Report • Suyapi’s monthly progress report • Implementation Completion and Results Report of IDMIP (2011) • IEG ICR Review of IDMIP (2011) • Azerbaijan CPF FY16–FY20 (Report No. 95860-AZ) • Review of World Bank engagement in the Irrigation and Drainage Sector in Azerbaijan (2012) Page 52 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 7. DETAILS OF THE WUA SITES BENEFITING FROM WUAP INVESTMENTS Torpağın meliorativ Bərpa olunmuş Suvarma Kanallarının uzunluğu, pm O Yeni Tikilmiş T əmir olunmuş (SİB-in xidmət ərazisin ə Bərpa olunmuş Drenaj Torpağın su vəziyyətinin T əmir-b ərpa işl ərinin cüml əd ən Hidrotexniki Qurğular, Hidrotexniki Qurğular, Hidrotexniki Qurğular Rayon daxil olan kəndl ərin Şəb əkəl ərinin ümumu EP boru SİB-in xidmət sah əsi təminatınınyaxşılaşdrılması yaxşılaşdrılması tamamlanma tarixi Length of Rehabilitated Canal əd əd əd əd CƏMİ, əd əd No and sayı, əd əd) uzunluğu xətdinin WUA Command Area (ha) Area Benefitting from Area that has benefitted (Date of completion of Newly Built Rehabilitated Total Hydrotechnical WUA No of villages in Torpaq məcralı Beton üzlüklü, pm Total Length of Drainage çəkilməsi, pm Improved Water Supply (ha) from improved soil Rehabilitation Works) Hydrotechnical works Hdrotechnical Works works (pcs) command area of WUA (Earth canal m) Lined Canal (m) Canal completed (m) Conditions (ha) (pcs) (pcs) 1 Quba "Alekseyevka" 5 2158 2158 02/07/2012 18366.29 14230.00 84 69 153 2 Xaçmaz "Pirquluoba" 8 2479 2479 2479 30/04/2014 55292.58 5347.00 11189.64 218 11 229 3 İmişli "R2" 2 2405 2405 2405 20/09/2013 85550.74 1026.00 35300.00 262 116 378 4 İmişlin "Araz" 2 1524 1524 1524 31/05/2014 39489.86 583.00 20889.66 151 18 169 5 İmişlin "Elat" 2 2496 2496 2496 30/06/2015 52480.64 2013.00 26586.85 134 69 203 6 Saatlı "F ətəlikənd" 2 3047 3047 3047 31/07/2013 69791.44 97992.23 280 60 340 7 Saatlı "Əlisultanlı " 3 2568 2568 2568 30/04/2014 50441.00 1250.00 41634.00 167 46 213 8 Saatlı "Smadakənd" 1 1350 1350 1350 31/05/2015 44235.52 700.00 23869.40 73 22 95 Sabirabad 9 1 1299 1299 1299 30/06/2013 33965.57 30571.14 132 51 183 "Əhmədabad" 10 Sabirabad "Ulacalı " 4 2452 2452 2452 31/07/2013 68441.95 54355.05 228 36 264 11 Sabirabad "Axıska" 1 1237 1237 1237 31/10/2014 44962.4 36726.00 101 2 103 12 Sabirabad "Moranlı " 2 2698 2698 2698 30/04/2015 54904.64 40235.51 228 1 229 13 Zakatala "Qımır" 6 3747 3747 25/12/2013 45564.03 8457.00 __ 212 11 223 14 Ağcabədi "Qaradolaq" 3 4466 4466 4466 31/10/2013 75002.99 2844.00 50354.98 276 18 294 15 Ağcabədi "Mehrablı " 2 3074 3074 3074 31/01/2015 66151.43 3277.00 16453.46 173 4 177 16 Beyləqan "Bahar" 2 3585 3585 3585 28/02/2014 61224.00 270.00 52054.00 229 28 257 17 Beyləqan "Dünyamalılar" 1 4731 4731 4731 31/07/2014 89890.64 2940.00 30763.52 317 32 349 18 Z ərdab "Cavar" 4 2255 2255 2255 31/03/2014 47868.55 4163.00 13458.19 130 22 152 19 Goranboy "Veyisli" 3 2044 2044 31/01/2014 33704.89 1979.00 120 11 131 20 Goranboy "Dəliozan" 7 2860 2860 30/06/2014 41214.96 6167.00 93 2 95 21 Goranboy "Xanq ərvənd" 3 3807 3807 28/02/2015 54752.74 8136.00 200 1 201 İsmayıllı 22 3 783 783 31/01/2014 27970.64 1730 68 7 75 "Qurban əfəndi" 23 Qax "Meliorator" 14 2784 2784 30/09/2014 50760.17 4559.88 243 11 254 24 Qəbələ "Dəmiraparan" 12 3760 3760 31/08/2014 84285.66 8821.60 232 7 239 25 Balakən "İrriqator" 8 5773 5773 31/10/2014 42613.76 13267.15 142 8 150 26 Qusar "Qusar-Şahdağ" 22 4795 4795 30/07/2015 80320.00 24561.00 2121 218 29 247 Beyləqan Yuxarı Aran- 27 2 3068 3068 3068 30/09/2015 47725.09 5371.00 53266.61 211 28 239 Mayak" 28 Xaçmaz "Xanarx" 15 5227 5227 31/10/2015 74560.94 22478.00 187 6 193 29 Beyləqan "T əzəkənd" 3 4904 4904 4904 30/11/2015 85732.00 8561.32 22470.00 265 51 316 30 Quba "Gülüstan" 7 2430 2430 24/12/2015 55641.11 5882.00 2800 120 63 183 31 Qusar "Qusarçay" 11 5262 5262 24/10/2015 55567.94 33332.00 100 134 10 144 32 Z ərdab "ÇTZ" 4 3229 3229 3229 30/09/2016 62720.18 7825.00 29668.43 173 10 183 33 Saatlı "Dəd ə Qorğud " 4 3240 3240 3240 30/09/2016 54127.00 7443.00 64096.00 226 17 243 34 Sabirabad "Yolçub əyli" 3 3137 3137 3137 30/11/2016 80852.47 6953.00 37173.76 327 38 365 35 İmişli "Boztəp ə" 2 2536 2536 2536 31/07/2017 78084.36 6330.00 26082.82 188 48 236 36 Ağcabədi "S.Vurğun " 4 3865 3865 3865 25/09/2017 57162.47 2459.34 30351.06 207 91 298 37 Beyləqan "Bünyadlı " 2 2475 2475 2475 27/09/2017 57129.36 5577.76 13696.15 268 41 309 38 Goranboy "Safıkürd " 4 2917 2917 10/11/2017 79883.42 2849.20 244 3 247 39 Saatlı "Nəsimikənd" 1 2043 2043 2043 15/12/2017 42846.64 5715.00 55452.55 151 24 175 CƏMİ: 185 118510.0 118510.0 70163.0 2251280.07 235368.25 914691.01 6751.00 7412 1122 8534 Page 53 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 8. WUA DATA (2017) FROM WUA DATABASE Actual Amount of Water Supplied to WUA Number Participants of General Assembly Total amount of WT paid to AIOJSC (AZN) Total amount of WT to be paid to AIOJSC Number of General Assembly Meetings Amount of water requested by WUA Planned WUA Net Salaries (AZN) Total Number of WUA Members ISF Collection Rate at least 65 % Actual WUA Net Salaries (AZN) Planned ISF Collection (AZN) Actual Cultivated Area (ha) Actual ISF Collection (AZN) ISF Collection Rate (%) Rehabilitated WUA ISF (AZN/1000 m3) WUA Area (ha) (million m3) (million m3) Meetings RAYON (AZN) WUA NN 1 XAÇMAZ QIMIL-QIŞLAQ 1361 1618 5 7.56 5.4 2 1361 35304 29863 11317 9159 2700 2700 44 85 1 2 XAÇMAZ QIRAQLI 1727 856 2.5 8.768 8.044 2 1727 14920 9265 5250 3990 4022 4022 38 62 0 3 XAÇMAZ YALAMA NABRAN 2030 1822 2.5 6.66 6.4 1 2030 8552 5009 3000 1279 3200 3200 31 59 0 4 XAÇMAZ YENI HƏYAT 1787 1454 2.8 8.2 6.57 2 1787 16125 11140 7040 4114 4050 4050 43 69 1 5 XAÇMAZ YERGÜC 3560 2670 4 17.4 17.2 2 3560 44000 32972 12432 9643 8600 8600 0 75 1 6 XAÇMAZ MÜŞKÜR 4495 3769 2.5 6.5 6.3 1 4495 12097 8352 2200 1632 5260 5260 49 69 1 7 XAÇMAZ PIRQULU OBA 2479 1048 2.8 9.432 7.4 3 2479 21409 17513 8700 6118 3450 3450 46 82 1 1 8 XAÇMAZ RƏHIM OBA 3986 1808 2.5 14.26 12.1 1 3986 16625 11057 1895 1150 6150 6150 81 67 1 9 XAÇMAZ SAHIL 3062 2411 4.82 10.6 7.6 2 3062 50409 13032 15600 2978 5300 5300 50 26 0 10 XAÇMAZ XAN ARX 5327 2781 3.81 12.91 12.81 2 5327 29168 16779 7000 6633 6405 6405 58 58 0 1 11 XAÇMAZ ÇARXI 4854 1320 2.5 10.76 9.99 2 4854 17470 12190 5950 5950 4550 4550 48 70 1 12 XAÇMAZ ÇINARTALA 3055 2870 3.86 12.42 12.42 2 3055 32369 28844 9480 9480 6207 6207 60 89 1 13 XAÇMAZ ŞABRAN 3094 536 2.5 6 4.3 1 3094 12182 4386 4300 0 3250 3250 47 36 0 14 XAÇMAZ ŞIMAL 4853 1142 4.25 13 9.5 1 4853 27174 18640 10855 7975 4750 4750 45 69 1 15 XAÇMAZ HƏYAT 4616 2247 2.5 11.01 10.72 1 4616 15184 13053 6300 6300 5630 5630 87 86 1 16 QUSAR QUSAR ÇAY 5262 1780 3.5 9.738 9.81 1 5262 23246 19351 4830 3366 4905 4905 58 83 1 1 17 QUSAR IMAMQULUKƏND 3447 2600 2.92 9.96 9.99 1 3088 23275 19717 2160 3333 4997 4997 48 85 1 18 QUSAR GOVDIŞAN 6091 2050 2.97 9.316 9.34 1 6091 24900 26005 2880 4446 4670 4670 65 104 1 19 QUSAR QUSAR ŞAHDAĞ 4795 5172 2.81 9.8 9.81 1 4795 19749 15801 2880 2964 4905 4905 55 80 1 20 QUSAR ŞAHDAĞ 3481 670 3 5728 5770 1 3481 14606 7294 3750 1716 2885 2885 47 50 0 1 21 QUSAR ŞİRVANOVKA 5480 1120 3 9.236 9.32 1 5480 22791 13763 4650 2991 4660 4660 52 60 0 22 QUBA ALEKSEYEVKA 2158 1780 7 9 9 1 2158 35000 16675 16500 6166 4500 4500 45 48 0 1 23 QUBA BULAQDƏRƏ 2852 1415 3 2.64 2.64 1 2552 8794 4425 4180 379 1320 1320 55 50 0 24 QUBA VƏLVƏLƏ 2315 856 3.5 3.2 3.2 1 2215 9110 7000 2400 1469 1600 1600 46 77 1 25 QUBA QUBA 1627 2008 4.5 1.16 1.16 1 1627 7000 900 1100 0 580 580 30 13 0 26 QUBA QUDYALÇAY 2613 807 6 8.624 8.624 2 2512 34812 22318 10000 6335 4312 4312 120 64 1 Page 54 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 27 QUBA QIZILQAYA 1875 2015 4.8 1.4 1.4 1 1875 9600 3840 1600 0 700 700 36 40 0 28 QUBA DAĞLI 1626 1614 2.8 3.71 3.71 1 1626 8758 5585 2320 393 1855 1855 27 64 0 29 QUBA ZƏRDABI 2005 2121 4.8 8.6 8.6 2 2005 31925 20454 8040 6589 4300 4300 54 64 1 30 QUBA PAŞAOBA BƏQROV 1093 316 3 3 3 1 929 9170 6500 2500 2360 1500 1500 199 71 1 31 QUBA RAMIN 1610 820 3.2 1.4 2 1 1110 4348 920 1100 0 520 520 30 21 0 32 QUBA I NÜGƏDI 2747 2649 3 2.6 2.6 2 2433 10000 6180 4400 1415 1300 1300 85 62 0 33 QUBA GÜLÜSTAN 2430 1348 5 8.898 8.898 1 2430 49500 23322 17080 11210 4449 4449 44 47 0 1 34 QAX MELIORATOR 2748 886 2.35 7.5 7.5 1 2748 18120 16885 7200 7200 3750 3750 57 93 1 1 35 QAX TURACLI 5990 1913 2.15 16.34 16.34 1 5990 21624 19049 7200 7200 8170 8170 120 88 1 36 QAX Şotavar-Lələli 4913 1381 2.32 13.42 13.42 1 4913 20506 17057 7200 7200 6710 6710 90 83 1 37 QAX Qax-Bas 6099 2399 2.15 16.64 16.64 1 5699 21204 18662 7200 7200 8320 8320 143 88 1 38 ZAQATALA QARA ÇAY 5717 825 2.2 15.354 15.43 1 5717 12550 9670 1440 220 7715 7715 74 77 1 39 ZAQATALA QIMIR 3747 500 2.3 13.392 13.45 1 3747 13896 11170 1440 220 6725 6725 52 80 1 1 40 ZAQATALA TALA 4024 440 2.3 10.596 10.9 1 3928 9867 6915 1440 240 5450 5450 68 70 1 41 ZAQATALA GÖYƏM 2074 260 2.3 6.658 6.6 1 2074 5165 3445 1440 0 3300 3300 64 67 1 42 BALAKƏN BALAKƏN 1050 150 3.6 2.5 2.5 1 1035 12268 9237 2860 860 1250 1250 29 75 1 43 BALAKƏN IRRIQATOR 5773 820 2.4 9 9 1 5773 16637 13755 2000 1640 4475 4475 57 83 1 1 44 İSMAYILLI QALINCAQ 4005 1257 2.58 10.8 10.8 0 4005 7720 6931 2000 1440 5400 5400 81 90 1 45 İSMAYILLI QURBANƏFƏNDI 783 858 2.6 2.9 2.9 1 783 4997 4011 1896 1440 1300 1300 27 80 1 1 46 İSMAYILLI KÜRDMAŞI 4045 3150 2.6 11.3 11.3 1 4045 8870 6784 1800 900 5650 5650 91 76 1 47 QƏBƏLƏ QOCALAN 4407 2182 3 9.7 9.7 1 4407 12650 6620 2600 500 4850 4850 43 52 0 48 QƏBƏLƏ QƏBƏLƏ 7757 5621 2 16.4 16.4 1 7757 18015 10212 2600 500 8200 8200 42 57 0 49 QƏBƏLƏ DƏMIRAPARAN 3760 1680 3 8.9 8.9 1 3760 18900 13262 4600 2200 4450 4450 45 70 1 1 50 İMIŞLI BOZTƏPƏ 3440 216 2.26 16.9 16.9 1 2516 19309 14714 2784 2784 6772 6772 25 76 1 1 51 İMIŞLI QALA 1648 597 3.04 3.87 3.87 1 872 6788 5391 1680 1680 1935 1935 19 79 1 52 İMIŞLI QIZILARX 2000 456 2.93 6.6 6.6 1 1321 10909 9053 1680 1680 3292 3292 20 83 1 53 İMIŞLI QIZILKƏND 2254 385 2.95 8.9 8.9 1 1630 17478 14458 3360 3360 4445 4445 26 83 1 54 İMIŞLI DIRÇƏLIŞ 1217 1197 3 3.1 3.1 1 588 8221 6734 1392 1392 1546 1546 19 82 1 55 İMIŞLI ELAT 1275 678 3 6.56 6.56 1 1275 15889 12849 3360 2784 3280 3280 22 81 1 1 56 İMIŞLI YENI HƏYAT 2543 1102 2.9 109 10.9 1 2610 20210 15618 2520 2520 5442 5442 34 77 1 57 İMIŞLI MUĞAN 1510 381 2.93 5.8 5.8 1 1228 9725 8470 2520 2520 2890 2890 21 87 1 58 İMIŞLI MƏZRƏLI 1163 585 3 5.2 5.2 1 1100 10341 7523 1392 1392 2603 2603 22 73 1 59 İMIŞLI OTUZIKI ŞƏMMƏD 1648 841 2.16 9.1 9.1 1 1648 12373 8269 1392 1392 4548 4548 17 67 1 60 İMIŞLI R-2 2405 1116 2.75 13.5 13.5 1 2405 20946 18236 2520 2520 6774 6774 21 87 1 1 61 İMIŞLI TALEH 1640 280 4.6 4.6 4.6 1 956 12012 9544 2880 2160 2298 2298 18 79 1 62 İMIŞLI XƏLFƏLI 2168 233 2.91 8.2 8.2 1 1897 13778 11407 1392 1392 4075 4075 19 83 1 63 İMIŞLI ŞIRINQUM 2320 140 2.98 4.3 4.3 1 1933 7581 6475 1392 1392 2170 2170 20 85 1 64 İMIŞLI HACALMURADLI 1021 193 2.97 2.5 2.5 1 533 5945 5225 1392 1392 1250 1250 18 88 1 65 İMIŞLI HƏSƏNLI 1539 855 2.85 5.46 5.46 1 1315 9753 9066 2160 2160 2734 2734 22 93 1 66 İMIŞLI CƏFƏRLI 1888 674 2.95 6.12 6.12 1 1600 14056 13607 3000 1500 3060 3060 50 97 1 67 İMIŞLI GAVUR ARX 1709 930 1.77 11.3 11.3 1 1709 11464 9529 1680 1392 5654 5654 21 83 1 68 İMIŞLI ƏLQULLAR 2393 506 2.22 9.05 9.05 1 1888 12513 8902 1392 1392 4525 4525 21 71 1 69 İMIŞLI Rüstəmli 1858 935 2.9 6.5 6.5 1 1515 9085 7445 1392 1392 3242 3242 23 82 1 Page 55 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 70 İMIŞLI ARAZ 1174 354 3.24 5.856 5.856 1 1174 15173 12415 3360 3360 2928 2928 20 82 1 1 71 İMIŞLI BULUDLU 1875 486 2.99 3.19 3.19 1 546 7219 5132 1392 1392 1593 1593 23 71 1 72 İMIŞLI GOBAKTALA 1350 123 2.22 6.7 6.7 1 1230 10952 0 1392 0 0 0 19 0 0 73 İMIŞLI XEKI 2482 720 2.9 13.3 13.3 1 2482 15353 13398 2784 2784 6629 6629 28 87 1 74 SAATLI AZADKƏND 1380 365 1.62 9.4 11.9 1 1380 12798 11690 1920 1920 5990 5990 30 91 1 75 SAATLI VARXANKƏND 1820 526 2 9.4 8.4 2 1800 16000 13212 3120 3120 4222 4222 60 83 1 76 SAATLI QARA NURU 3172 1911 2.5 15 10.5 2 2872 30326 12837 3300 3300 5287 5287 66 42 0 77 SAATLI QARAYEVKƏND 1410 516 1.9 7.7 7.1 2 1410 11456 6388 1800 1800 3550 3550 50 56 0 78 SAATLI QARACALAR 2985 549 1.98 14.9 12.4 2 2775 21626 13422 1620 1620 6034 6034 72 62 0 79 SAATLI QIRAĞLI 2300 1498 1.9 9.2 8 2 2300 16409 11686 1680 1680 5595 5595 77 71 1 80 SAATLI DƏDƏ QORQUD 3047 1178 2 15.3 13.4 2 2757 25600 13503 3360 3360 6700 6700 61 53 0 1 81 SAATLI DƏLLƏR 2020 431 1.5 11.3 8.1 2 2020 13929 9262 1800 1920 4072 4072 49 66 1 82 SAATLI MIRCƏLALKƏND 1840 375 1.7 6.6 4.8 2 1050 9537 7892 3120 3120 2430 2430 49 83 1 83 SAATLI MƏMMƏDABAD 2020 780 1.67 12 8.2 2 2020 17033 10803 1560 1560 4113 4113 54 63 0 84 SAATLI NƏRIMANKƏND 3552 282 1.5 13.4 12.6 2 3204 17085 13102 2160 2160 6342 6342 37 77 1 85 SAATLI NƏSIMIKƏND 1748 768 1.6 8 5 2 1748 12376 5977 1800 1800 2537 2537 65 48 0 1 86 SAATLI SAATLI 2800 1669 1.67 11 8.4 2 2519 15100 12000 4080 3840 4200 4200 55 79 1 87 SAATLI SMADAKƏND 1350 382 2 7.4 8.9 2 1350 12265 11985 3360 3360 4455 4455 55 98 1 1 88 SAATLI SOLTANABAD 1044 288 1.8 6 4.2 2 1044 7508 4955 2550 2550 2115 2115 0 66 1 89 SAATLI FƏTƏLIKƏND 3444 808 1.8 12.5 11.7 2 3444 14208 12472 2400 2400 5883 5883 77 88 1 1 90 SAATLI XANLARKƏND 1100 361 2 5.7 4.3 2 1100 9690 7630 1920 1920 2150 2150 49 79 1 91 SAATLI ÇOLPI 1150 413 1.75 6.6 3 2 1150 9818 5908 2160 2160 1683 1683 58 60 0 92 SAATLI ŞIRINBƏY 2130 936 1.7 9.6 6 2 1791 14264 8187 3480 3480 3017 3017 55 57 0 93 SAATLI HACIQASIMLI 3414 626 1.55 18 12.6 2 3349 23715 10974 1620 1620 6314 6314 49 46 0 94 SAATLI ƏBILKƏND 980 152 1.8 6.6 5 2 980 10098 8260 3360 3360 2500 2500 42 82 1 95 SAATLI ƏLISOLTANLI 1915 737 1.8 10.6 9.4 2 1880 10085 8170 1620 1620 4330 4330 81 81 1 1 96 SAATLI ƏHMƏDBƏYLI 1450 1023 1.85 16.6 13.1 2 3630 20862 12240 1980 1980 6550 6550 47 59 0 97 SABIRABAD AZADAKƏND 1616 650 2.41 8.32 8.158 2 1616 24705 20106 8784 7200 4160 4160 76 81 1 98 SABIRABAD AXISXA 1237 728 4.16 7.14 7.068 1 1237 24148 19319 10980 9000 3570 3570 173 80 1 1 99 SABIRABAD BALA HƏŞIMXANLI 1585 380 2.61 9.04 11.89 2 1585 12843 7309 1734 0 5944 5944 57 57 0 100 SABIRABAD BEŞDƏLI 1408 387 1.3 6.2 6.16 2 3100 17930 15230 5520 5520 3100 3100 64 85 1 101 SABIRABAD QALAQAYIN 1551 1415 2.69 8.81 7.78 2 1551 9077 5320 1520 0 3890 3890 54 59 0 102 SABIRABAD QARALAR 1128 660 2.93 7.6 10.468 2 1128 12372 7789 2520 1080 5234 5234 38 63 0 103 SABIRABAD QARATƏPƏ 1800 872 2.59 11 14.2 2 1800 11485 10301 2160 1280 7104 7104 64 90 1 104 SABIRABAD QARAGÜNEY 1483 895 2.9 10.24 11.83 1 1483 29975 24540 10980 9000 5120 5120 173 82 1 105 SABIRABAD QASIMBƏYLI 1471 959 1.88 9.636 9.574 2 1471 20116 16038 8198 6720 4818 4818 68 80 1 106 SABIRABAD QURUZMA 3668 1434 1.62 19.74 19.924 2 3668 40143 30159 8784 7200 9870 9870 104 75 1 107 SABIRABAD ZƏNGƏƏNƏ 1674 793 3.84 9.708 9.208 1 1674 16786 13573 8198 6720 4554 4554 155 81 1 108 SABIRABAD YOLÇUBƏYLI 3137 1561 1.73 19.28 19.144 1 3137 34328 28848 10980 9000 9640 9640 144 84 1 1 109 SABIRABAD KOVLAR 1269 297 3.91 5.76 5.664 2 1269 20453 15725 8784 7200 2880 2880 136 77 1 110 SABIRABAD KÜRKƏNDI 2221 1221 2.09 14.09 17.138 2 2221 24555 15728 5520 3312 8569 8569 36 64 1 111 SABIRABAD MINBAŞI 1354 497 2.14 10.8 10.8 2 1354 21329 17000 8784 7200 5400 5400 63 80 1 112 SABIRABAD MORANLI 2812 528 2.68 10.244 8.7 2 2698 9071 7432 1400 800 4350 4350 100 82 1 1 Page 56 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 113 SABIRABAD MUĞANGƏNCƏLI 4325 1915 2 20.928 20.672 2 4325 33952 24673 10980 9000 10464 10464 98 73 1 114 SABIRABAD NIZAMI 2323 1174 2.83 10.26 7.38 2 2323 11505 7737 2160 1680 3690 3690 88 67 1 115 SABIRABAD NƏRMANKƏND 1543 653 2.62 9.04 10.89 2 1543 10066 6547 1520 400 5447 5447 56 65 1 116 SABIRABAD RÜSTƏMLI 1580 975 3.59 4.628 2 2 1580 15095 1000 3720 0 1000 1000 60 7 0 117 SABIRABAD SARXANBƏYLI 1781 292 2.79 8.4 5.9 2 1781 7856 4330 1160 300 2950 2950 67 55 0 118 SABIRABAD SURRA 2324 710 2.28 8.968 8.462 2 2324 24392 17486 8784 7200 4484 4484 86 72 1 119 SABIRABAD ULACALI 2452 1533 2.2 20 20 1 2452 32767 26572 10980 9000 10000 10000 143 81 1 1 120 SABIRABAD XANKEÇƏN 1038 438 4.18 4.369 4.284 2 1038 17134 12440 8784 7200 2180 2180 52 73 1 121 SABIRABAD XƏLFƏLI 1408 454 2.42 9.322 9.22 2 1408 8169 5227 1160 0 4610 4610 46 64 0 122 SABIRABAD ÇÖL-BEŞDƏLI 1900 437 2.87 8.81 7.52 2 1900 21091 8555 6734 2310 3760 3760 72 41 0 123 SABIRABAD ŞIXSALAHLI 1330 800 2.97 5.84 5.84 2 1330 20202 15923 8784 7200 2920 2920 66 79 1 124 SABIRABAD ŞƏHRIYAR 2636 624 2.59 10.722 9.04 2 2432 9119 5770 1160 500 4520 4520 82 63 0 125 SABIRABAD HACIBƏBIR 1359 243 2.97 7.21 7.28 2 1359 7319 4390 1160 0 3640 3640 51 60 0 126 SABIRABAD HƏŞIMXANLI 1484 772 2.23 11.6 11.364 2 1484 29068 21264 10980 9000 5800 5800 68 73 1 127 SABIRABAD CAVAD 2284 871 1.71 16.04 16.94 2 2284 34130 22820 10980 9000 8020 8020 80 67 1 128 SABIRABAD GÜDƏCÜHUR 3158 1030 1.77 16.94 16.94 2 3158 30891 25327 9442 7740 8470 8470 90 82 1 129 SABIRABAD ƏLILƏMBƏYLI 1840 367 2.84 8.49 6.77 2 1840 9550 6023 2160 790 3383 3383 69 63 0 130 SABIRABAD ƏSƏDLI 1065 682 2.86 7.256 10.1 2 1020 8938 7262 2520 1400 5052 5052 35 81 1 131 SABIRABAD ƏHMƏDABAD 1299 342 2.95 7.866 10714 2 1299 9525 7962 2160 1393 5357 5357 81 84 1 1 132 AĞCABƏDI AVŞAR 4480 870 1.5 24.4 21.9 2 4160 28665 20031 4440 4440 13988 13988 119 70 1 133 AĞCABƏDI BOYAT 2135 1074 2 15.4 14.2 2 2135 22793 19015 4920 4920 7100 7100 97 83 1 134 AĞCABƏDI QARABAĞ 4610 1436 2 35.84 35.84 1 4610 71680 46600 7800 7800 17920 17920 139 65 1 135 AĞCABƏDI QARADOLAQ 4221 1733 1.8 27.8 27.4 2 4146 49320 42844 6400 6400 13700 13700 172 87 1 1 136 AĞCABƏDI QAR-QAR 3338 1086 1.5 22400 21200 2 3338 33600 31800 9960 9960 10600 10600 114 95 1 137 AĞCABƏDI ILKIN 2896 790 2 11.5 10.6 2 2896 23000 21200 4920 4920 5310 5310 108 92 1 138 AĞCABƏDI KƏHRIZLI 2110 630 2 17 16.5 2 2110 27840 25485 5480 5480 8250 8250 113 92 1 139 AĞCABƏDI MEHRABLI 3074 685 2.23 19.848 19.848 2 3074 45108 38342 9240 9240 9422 9422 104 85 1 1 140 AĞCABƏDI MINƏXORLU 1250 402 2 11.2 9.8 2 1250 22400 19600 6480 6480 4900 4900 66 88 1 141 AĞCABƏDI MUĞANLI 3050 993 1.5 24.2 21.9 1 3050 36300 29729 7680 7680 10930 10930 55 82 1 142 AĞCABƏDI RƏNCBƏRLƏR 1523 328 1 13.84 13.84 1 1523 13840 13840 4920 4920 6920 6920 45 100 1 143 AĞCABƏDI S.VURĞUN 4584 1269 2.16 23.3 16.3 2 4584 35202 32360 6000 6000 17180 17180 130 92 1 1 144 AĞCABƏDI SALMANBƏYLI 4569 1278 2.5 33.96 33.96 1 4569 78080 78080 11400 11400 16980 16980 180 100 1 145 AĞCABƏDI T.ISMAYILOV 2980 602 2 18.1 16.5 2 2980 33000 24042 6680 6680 8250 8250 94 73 1 146 AĞCABƏDI XƏZƏR 4127 972 2 11.5 9.6 2 2917 23000 19200 9528 9528 4800 4800 136 83 1 147 AĞCABƏDI ŞƏNLIK 1489 651 1.5 10.9 9.6 2 1489 19025 14765 4560 4560 4800 4800 84 78 1 148 AĞCABƏDI HAQQ-ƏDALƏT 1160 316 2.5 6.5 4.4 1 1160 11100 9466 3480 3480 2220 2220 35 85 1 149 AĞCABƏDI HINDARX 2846 1210 1.5 23.5 22.7 2 2846 30410 26645 6360 6360 11760 11760 113 88 1 150 AĞCABƏDI HÜSÜLÜ 2048 703 1 19.5 18.2 2 2048 19500 18200 5880 5880 9100 9100 106 93 1 151 AĞCABƏDI Poladli 2271 792 1.6 26 24 2 2271 38400 32496 10800 10800 12000 12000 106 85 1 152 AĞCABƏDI Rufat 1472 525 1.5 20.4 20 2 1472 28600 24302 5320 5320 10000 10000 74 85 1 153 BEYLƏQAN AŞIXLI 2904 592 2.3 12 11 1 2904 17871 17871 4920 4920 5514 5514 64 100 1 154 BEYLƏQAN BAHAR 3516 834 2.3 16.132 16.132 1 3516 28600 24774 5500 5500 7983 7983 66 87 1 1 155 BEYLƏQAN BÜNYADLI 1685 574 2.3 9.5 7.8 1 1685 12100 11440 5165 4570 4080 4080 45 95 1 1 Page 57 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 156 BEYLƏQAN DÜNYAMALILAR 4239 1687 2.3 21 19 1 4239 25295 24351 4800 4800 9643 9643 45 96 1 1 157 BEYLƏQAN IMAMVERDILƏR 1397 424 2.3 7.5 6.3 1 1397 20380 18600 7680 4680 3442 3442 41 91 1 158 BEYLƏQAN YUXARI ARAN 3203 670 2.3 14 13 1 3203 24610 22224 5960 5960 7424 7424 39 90 1 1 159 BEYLƏQAN TƏZƏKƏND 5277 1462 2.3 22 21 1 5277 31825 29120 6360 7360 11815 11815 86 92 1 1 160 BEYLƏQAN XALAC 2290 749 2.3 11 10 1 2290 23600 22500 4800 4800 4562 4562 62 95 1 161 BEYLƏQAN ÇƏMƏNLI 2621 529 2.3 13.2 11.8 1 2621 21300 20180 4980 4820 5868 5868 70 95 1 162 BEYLƏQAN ŞAHSEVƏN 4001 2167 2.3 16.5 15.502 1 4001 37300 32600 6000 6000 7842 7842 45 87 1 163 BEYLƏQAN ŞƏRQ 5311 796 2.3 25 22 1 5311 32968 30388 8500 7560 12598 12598 101 92 1 164 BEYLƏQAN ŞƏHƏR 2572 420 2.3 12 11.4 1 2572 18000 15226 3640 3640 6024 6024 39 85 1 165 BEYLƏQAN ƏLINƏZƏRLI 1464 662 2.3 7 6 1 1462 18000 13400 6920 4920 3179 3179 64 74 1 166 BEYLƏQAN ARAN QALA 4555 1543 2.3 19.828 16.7 1 5049 28292 20364 9000 6800 8900 8900 50 72 1 167 BEYLƏQAN Kebirli 5813 2456 2.3 24.94 22.3 1 5813 30636 26396 9000 6480 12966 12966 113 86 1 168 GORANBOY BOLSULU 3359 3359 1.5 15 7.6 1 2700 7500 3800 5700 4500 3800 3800 96 51 0 169 GORANBOY BORSUNLU 3359 3359 1.5 15 7.6 1 2700 7500 3800 5700 4500 3800 3800 96 51 0 170 GORANBOY VEYISLI 2044 724 1.5 6.2 1.92 1 1650 9441 3828 1400 1400 957 957 61 41 0 1 171 GORANBOY QIZILHACILI 2636 1329 1.5 6.75 5.44 1 1636 6753 5444 2200 1800 1361 1361 143 81 1 172 GORANBOY DƏLI OZAN 2858 1360 1.5 4.4 3.88 1 2508 8800 7760 3840 3840 1940 1940 93 88 1 1 173 GORANBOY DƏLIMƏMMƏDLI 3610 1660 1.5 72 39.2 1 3345 72000 39150 9700 6600 13050 13050 71 54 0 174 GORANBOY KÜRƏKÇAY 3655 584 1.5 75 53 1 5847 79500 79500 15500 10800 26500 26500 43 100 1 175 GORANBOY SADILI 1412 807 1.5 5.45 5.33 1 1412 6732 7989 3240 3240 2663 2663 110 119 1 176 GORANBOY SAFIKÜRD 2213 1450 2 10.77 6.91 1 1413 13540 13820 5400 4680 3455 3455 63 102 1 1 177 GORANBOY FAQS 3246 2149 1.5 37.4 20.5 1 2646 37353 30720 18100 11100 10240 10240 79 82 1 178 GORANBOY XANQƏRVƏND 3807 1484 1.5 21.5 20.2 1 3807 32240 40400 13576 6380 10100 10100 70 125 1 1 179 GORANBOY ŞAHMƏMMƏDLI 1325 541 2 8.39 3.89 1325 1325 8391 3888 2280 1800 972 972 64 46 0 180 GORANBOY ŞORCA 1523 840 1.5 18.93 25.08 1 1271 26358 37620 8640 8640 12540 12540 81 143 1 181 GORANBOY HACALLI 1271 886 1.5 6.16 2.27 1 1271 9246 2501 1400 600 1137 1137 52 27 0 182 GORANBOY CAVADXAN #### 1369 1.5 8.43 12.08 1 1841 12615 18123 5400 5640 6041 6041 90 144 1 183 GORANBOY G.MUSTAFAYEV 1309 374 1.5 18 28 1 1309 27000 42000 8500 7200 14000 14000 48 156 1 184 GORANBOY Qaraçay 1208 487 1.4 1.3 0.99 1 600 330 330 450 450 330 330 48 100 1 185 GORANBOY Əlirzalı 1788 200 1.5 2.16 1.07 1 1200 3624 1599 920 420 533 533 31 44 0 186 GORANBOY Ədalətli 2360 608 1.5 25 19.5 1 2360 50000 29250 9700 5760 9750 9750 60 59 0 187 ZƏRDAB ALICANLI 1688 385 2 9468 8513 1 1688 15602 6534 5490 2927 3390 3390 21 42 0 188 ZƏRDAB QOŞAOBA 2259 447 2 11.494 11.2 1 2259 23033 13399 6002 3750 6600 6600 33 58 0 189 ZƏRDAB QIZLIQ 4256 946 1.5 24.4 18.3 1 4256 29254 14246 5344 3750 7840 7840 40 49 0 190 ZƏRDAB DƏDLIQUŞÇU 1090 323 2 7.456 8.156 1 1090 11938 8587 4538 3750 4280 4280 27 72 1 191 ZƏRDAB ISAQBAĞI 3020 453 1.5 19.011 20.878 1 3020 21025 16459 5490 3750 8400 8400 36 78 1 192 ZƏRDAB YARMƏMMƏDLI 1114 239 2 7.061 7.399 1 1114 11254 7040 4392 3750 2820 2820 29 63 0 193 ZƏRDAB KÖRPÜKƏND 1507 331 2 9857 11400 1 1507 15758 13162 5563 5050 6200 6200 34 84 1 194 ZƏRDAB MƏLIKLI 2291 612 2 13009 16142 1 2291 19185 11932 5520 3750 6300 6300 33 62 0 195 ZƏRDAB OTMANOBA 1646 287 2 9.36 12.28 1 1646 14916 10037 5490 3750 5400 5400 30 67 1 196 ZƏRDAB PƏRVANLI 722 319 2 4.528 4.04 1 722 9060 7171 3953 3750 2370 2370 30 79 1 197 ZƏRDAB ÇTZ 3229 610 1.5 18.092 16.74 1 3229 17809 14292 5520 3000 9350 9350 37 80 1 1 198 ZƏRDAB ŞAHHÜSEYNLI 1424 314 2 7.234 10.64 1 1242 11576 9560 4392 3750 4980 4980 29 83 1 Page 58 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 199 ZƏRDAB ŞSŞ 1466 375 2 8.646 7.376 1 1466 13895 6642 5344 3750 2440 2440 27 48 0 200 ZƏRDAB CAVAR 2255 855 2 14.203 16.379 1 2255 20771 17115 5929 3750 8170 8170 37 82 1 1 201 ZƏRDAB GÖDƏKQOBU 2488 760 2 13.826 17.648 1 2488 22262 19820 6002 6750 8420 8420 35 89 1 202 ZƏRDAB GƏNDƏBIL 1521 444 2 9.171 8.268 1 1521 14673 10590 4245 3750 4360 4360 29 72 1 203 ZƏRDAB GƏlMƏ 2710 1116 3 17.185 17.686 1 2710 41284 28922 9662 5750 8843 8843 42 70 1 204 ZƏRDAB Dəkkəoba 1114 239 2 6.242 5.666 1 1114 12457 6385 3600 3000 2390 2390 21 51 0 205 KÜRDƏMIR QARABUCAQ 1852 1657 1.25 8.355 8.355 2 1852 8092 7884 3300 3300 3232.5 3232.5 36 97 1 206 KÜRDƏMIR QARASAQQALLI 2202 2168 1.1 9.727 9.727 2 2202 10388 9662 3300 3300 4863.5 4863.5 19 93 1 207 KÜRDƏMIR QARASU 1792 618 1 7 7 2 1792 7001 6602 1800 1800 3500 3500 19 94 1 208 KÜRDƏMIR QOCALI-ƏRAZI 2594 464 1 8.4 8.4 2 2594 8467 7786 1800 1800 4300 4300 32 92 1 209 KÜRDƏMIR YENIKƏND 3409 3216 1 14.461 14.461 2 3409 13457 12484 3300 3300 6562 6562 45 93 1 210 KÜRDƏMIR KARRAR 3737 2376 1 15748 15748 2 3737 12927 11719 3300 3300 6758 6758 49 91 1 211 KÜRDƏMIR SOVLA-SÖYÜDLƏR 1100 254 1 6.8 6.8 2 1100 6879 6376 1800 1800 3400 3400 29 93 1 212 KÜRDƏMIR SOR-SOR 625 359 1.32 4.3 4.3 2 625 5703 5237 1500 1500 2150 2150 13 92 1 213 KÜRDƏMIR SIĞIRLI 3430 1633 1.1 14.543 14.543 2 3430 15508 14217 3300 3300 7271.5 7271.5 20 92 1 214 KÜRDƏMIR TOPAL HƏSƏNLI 6005 5642 1 24.643 24.643 2 6005 21413 20570 3300 3300 11240 11240 46 96 1 215 KÜRDƏMIR XINISLI 2039 1874 1.1 9.088 9.088 2 2039 10366 9803 3300 3300 4544 4544 45 95 1 216 KÜRDƏMIR XIRDAPAY 2315 2127 1.1 10.171 10.171 2 2315 10153 9708 3300 3300 4751 4751 47 96 1 217 KÜRDƏMIR ÇÖHRANLI 2196 1436 1.1 9.704 9.704 2 2196 10444 9938 3300 3300 4852 4852 86 95 1 218 KÜRDƏMIR ŞILYAN 1556 648 1 6.8 6.8 2 1556 6802 6419 1800 1800 3400 3400 20 94 1 219 KÜRDƏMIR ŞÜŞÜN 2100 336 1 7.4 7.4 2 2100 7402 6817 1800 1800 3700 3700 44 92 1 220 KÜRDƏMIR ŞIXIMLI 3160 2855 1 13.485 13.485 2 3160 12560 11951 3300 3300 6290 6290 32 95 1 221 KÜRDƏMIR CARLI QUŞLAR 1886 322 1 7.5 7.5 2 1886 7513 6980 1800 1800 3750 3750 47 93 1 222 KÜRDƏMIR GARIŞ-ƏYRIBƏND 2851 2130 1.1 12.273 12.273 1 2851 11820 10989 3300 3300 5586 5586 42 93 1 223 AĞSU AĞARX 2239 317 3 5.974 5.974 1 2239 7454 6525 3240 3240 2085 2085 40 88 1 224 AĞSU QARAMƏMMƏDLI 1810 119 2 5.687 5.687 1 1810 8248 6820 2940 2940 1876 1876 38 83 1 225 AĞSU QƏŞƏD 2329 205 4 5.088 5.088 1 2329 7070 6254 2940 2940 2065 2065 42 88 1 226 AĞSU DAŞDƏMIRBƏYLI 853 320 3 2.456 2.456 1 853 7027 5927 2940 2940 952 952 30 84 1 227 AĞSU MUSABƏYLI 3311 568 3 6.482 6.482 1 3311 9990 9590 4260 4260 2880 2880 47 96 1 228 AĞSU NÖVCÜ 1983 180 3 6.024 6.024 1 1983 7239 6789 2940 2940 2081 2081 40 94 1 229 AĞSU PADAR 1246 431 3 4.036 4.036 1 1246 6505 6046 2940 2940 1411 1411 32 93 1 230 AĞSU PADARQIŞLAQ 1250 223 2 4.674 4.674 1 1246 9783 8043 2940 2940 2181 2181 34 82 1 231 AĞSU RƏHIMLI 2506 177 3 7.016 7.016 1 2506 8420 7594 2940 2940 2915 2915 43 90 1 232 AĞSU SARVAN 2150 282 3 6.873 6.873 1 2150 9236 7502 2940 2940 2445 2445 41 81 1 233 AĞSU ÇAPARLI 3441 206 3 6.728 6.728 1 3441 7683 7054 2940 2940 3064 3064 67 92 1 234 AĞSU CƏFƏRLI 5223 457 3 6.798 6.798 1 5223 10876 9546 2940 2940 5121 5121 57 88 1 235 AĞSU GƏĞƏLI 3408 400 3 13.828 13.828 1 3408 8347 8068 4260 4260 3408 3408 48 97 1 236 AĞSU ƏRƏBMEHDIBƏY 4461 423 3 10.874 10.874 1 4461 12180 9480 2940 2940 4505 4505 47 78 1 237 AĞSU Pirhəsənli 861 363 2 3.464 3.464 1 861 6395 5426 2940 2940 804 804 30 85 1 238 UCAR ALPOUT 2021 802 2 7.621 7.621 1 2021 15242 9135 5520 4440 3810 3810 17 60 0 239 UCAR BOYAT 1707 854 2 7.01 7.01 1 1707 10445 9369 3600 3600 3525 3525 43 90 1 240 UCAR BƏRGÜŞAD 2124 1121 2 8.22 8.22 2 2124 15216 11359 4740 4740 4060 4060 94 75 1 241 UCAR QAZIQUMLAQ 1433 1150 2 5.942 5.942 2 1433 10534 9141 4160 4160 2971 2971 72 87 1 Page 59 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 242 UCAR QARABÖRK 1618 1543 2 6.98 6.98 2 1618 10372 8508 3600 3600 3500 3500 90 82 1 243 UCAR QARADAĞLI 1316 826 2 4.765 4.765 2 1316 9230 8366 3960 3960 2382 2382 90 91 1 244 UCAR QARACALLI 1793 1379 2 7.466 7.466 2 1793 9973 8558 3600 3600 3733 3733 82 86 1 245 UCAR QULABƏND 1594 497 2 6.76 6.76 2 1594 11035 9820 4800 4800 3380 3380 81 89 1 246 UCAR QƏZYAN 2031 1203 2 8.11 8.11 2 2031 12825 11746 5400 5400 4055 4055 88 92 1 247 UCAR YUXARI ŞILYAN 2323 797 2 9.338 9.338 2 2323 13823 12837 6060 6060 4670 4670 81 93 1 248 UCAR LƏK 2067 892 2 8.074 8.074 2 2067 12255 10567 4740 4740 4037 4037 63 86 1 249 UCAR TÜRKƏÇI 743 258 2 2.9 2.9 2 743 7941 6675 3960 3960 1450 1450 73 84 1 250 UCAR TƏZƏ ŞILYAN 1566 812 2 6.3 6.3 2 1566 10552 8985 4320 4320 3150 3150 77 85 1 251 UCAR ŞAHLIQ 3366 772 2 13.231 13.231 2 3366 16429 14810 6240 6240 6608 6608 66 90 1 252 BELƏSUVAR AŞAĞI CÜRƏLI 2951 1220 1.45 10.469 12.882 1 2951 18109 14114 7524 7524 6168 6168 43 78 1 253 BELƏSUVAR AĞALIKƏND 4220 1592 1.5 15.221 20.937 1 4220 27680 12489 7464 7464 7102 7102 46 45 0 254 BELƏSUVAR BAĞBANLAR 3697 1221 1.45 13.283 16.153 1 3697 21364 11728 7704 7704 3540 3540 41 55 0 255 BELƏSUVAR BƏYDILI 1243 669 1.45 4.526 6.416 1 1243 8809 6398 3240 3200 3000 3000 34 73 1 256 BELƏSUVAR ISMƏTLI 3521 1328 1.48 13.265 17.36 1 3521 17092 17088 7704 7704 8640 8640 48 100 1 257 BELƏSUVAR NƏRIMANKƏND 3016 1138 1.5 11.356 13.222 1 3016 16800 12304 6264 6264 5200 5200 46 73 1 258 BELƏSUVAR NƏSIMIKƏND 2835 1069 1.5 11.203 11.572 1 2835 23624 14259 7704 7704 5568 5568 34 60 0 259 BELƏSUVAR R-4 5520 2983 1.45 20.407 28.024 1 5520 30842 18905 10488 10488 8160 8160 60 61 0 260 BELƏSUVAR SƏMƏDƏBAD 4794 1233 1.5 17.745 16.834 1 4794 26697 17615 9024 9024 8000 8000 53 66 1 261 BELƏSUVAR ƏLIABAD 4391 1656 1.55 14.69 16.591 1 4391 19662 14073 7707 7704 5918 5918 48 72 1 262 BELƏSUVAR ƏSGƏRABAD 2721 1088 1.5 9.543 11.575 1 2721 13999 9728 5844 5844 3600 3600 41 69 1 263 SAMUX QARAYERI 7402 4059 1.7 44.18 48.2 1 5000 56100 46353 10035 6831 24100 24100 36 83 1 264 SAMUX KOLAYIR 7506 4221 1.7 36 55.8 1 7506 48330 46150 10605 10920 27900 27900 73 95 1 265 SAMUX GƏNCƏÇAY 7679 9025 1.7 43.9 72.7 1 7679 58600 53172 12405 9360 36350 36350 76 91 1 266 GÖYÇAY ALPOUD 1119 495 1.83 4.859 4.524 1 1119 8297 4064 3120 520 2262 2262 28 49 0 GÖYÇAY AŞAĞI 1275 445 1.7 5.526 5.112 1 1275 8756 4204 3120 520 2556 2556 34 48 0 267 QARAMƏRYƏM 268 GÖYÇAY BIĞIR 1338 1015 1.86 5.957 5.314 1 1338 9952 4672 3840 600 2657 2657 32 47 0 269 GÖYÇAY BƏYDÖVLÜ 900 242 2.09 3.871 3.743 1 900 7850 3802 3120 650 1871.5 1871.5 30 48 0 270 GÖYÇAY QARABAQQAL 969 847 1.57 6520 5.77 1 969 9100 4820 3120 650 2885 2885 31 53 0 271 GÖYÇAY QARAYAZI 945 1319 2.14 4.169 3.954 1 945 8502 4049 3120 650 1977 1977 33 48 0 272 GÖYÇAY QARAXIDIR 595 253 2.6 2.712 2.658 1 595 7546 3480 3120 750 1329 1329 20 46 0 273 GÖYÇAY QIZILAĞAC 1263 409 1.88 5.201 5.07 1 1263 9561 5004 3840 1140 2535 2535 32 52 0 274 GÖYÇAY INÇƏ 1220 826 1.61 5.708 5.56 1 1220 8958 4400 3120 520 2780 2780 34 49 0 275 GÖYÇAY YENI-ARX 1184 741 2.07 4.772 4.602 1 1184 9503 3203 3840 600 2301 2301 40 34 0 276 GÖYÇAY KÜRDŞABAN 873 255 2.15 3.926 3.601 1 873 8234 3574 3600 650 1800.5 1800.5 29 43 0 277 GÖYÇAY LƏKÇILPAQ 3031 1983 1.46 10.737 9.758 1 3031 14364 9105 4560 1760 4879 4879 39 63 0 278 GÖYÇAY MALLI-ŞIXLI 871 538 2.1 3.682 3.639 1 871 7669 3473 3120 630 1819.5 1819.5 29 45 0 279 GÖYÇAY MÜŞKÜRLÜ 1027 284 2 4.295 3.998 2 1027 8047 3794 3120 720 1999 1999 33 47 0 280 GÖYÇAY MIRTI 853 312 2.22 3.684 3.478 1 853 7747 4000 3120 480 1739 1739 28 52 0 281 GÖYÇAY MƏLIKKƏND 1172 362 1.97 4.812 4.736 1 1172 9369 4702 3840 1080 2368 2368 33 50 0 282 GÖYÇAY POTU 1640 875 1.7 7.03 6.186 1 1640 10519 5610 3840 900 3093 3093 38 53 0 283 GÖYÇAY ÇAXIRLI 1291 690 1.89 5.313 5.157 1 1291 9387 5427 3840 1400 2528.5 2528.5 32 58 0 Page 60 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 284 GÖYÇAY ÇƏRƏKƏ 1182 997 2.26 4.896 4.806 1 1182 10461 9429 4200 4200 2403 2403 28 90 1 285 GÖYÇAY ŞƏKƏR 981 422 2.02 4.327 4.038 1 981 8060 4642 3120 1250 2019 2019 33 58 0 286 GÖYÇAY ŞƏHADƏT 2059 1201 1.57 8.656 7.368 1 2059 11565 5544 3840 600 3648 3648 43 48 0 287 GÖYÇAY CƏYIRLI 660 926 2.49 3.259 2.929 1 660 7312 2623 3120 450 1464.5 1464.5 23 36 0 288 ŞƏMKIR A.TEYMUR 1400 358 5 9.9 9.9 2 1400 28007 27207 12400 11600 4241 4241 39 97 1 289 ŞƏMKIR ALABAŞLI 1508 526 3.21 8.13 8.13 2 1554 11759 11759 3840 3840 1834 1834 31 100 1 290 ŞƏMKIR QAPANLI 2136 565 3 10.4 10.4 2 2136 6851 6851 2640 2640 1146 1146 39 100 1 291 ŞƏMKIR QARABAĞLAR 542 163 3.3 2.7 2.7 2 542 7981 7981 3840 3840 1210 1210 33 100 1 292 ŞƏMKIR QARACƏMILLI 3000 455 3.13 12.9 12.9 2 3000 23970 23970 6540 6540 3800 3800 21 100 1 293 ŞƏMKIR QILINCBƏYLI 697 168 3.34 3.1 2.7 2 697 7911 6771 3780 2640 1184 1184 17 86 1 294 ŞƏMKIR D.CIRDAXAN 1549 630 2.63 6.7 6.7 2 1549 12269 12269 3840 3840 2335 2335 35 100 1 295 ŞƏMKIR D.CƏYIR 1939 432 2.74 8 8 2 1939 13249 13249 5040 5040 2420 2420 29 100 1 296 ŞƏMKIR DÜZQIŞLAQ 558 179 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 558 4046 4046 1440 1440 809 809 34 100 1 297 ŞƏMKIR DÜYƏRLI 2754 650 3.37 11.1 11.1 2 2754 8935 8935 3840 3840 1325 1325 31 100 1 298 ŞƏMKIR ZƏYƏM CIRDAXAN 2286 1123 2.7 9.6 9.6 2 2286 9272 9272 2640 2640 1721 1721 23 100 1 299 ŞƏMKIR ZƏHMƏT 1115 340 3.54 5.3 5.3 2 1115 15051 15051 3840 3840 2139 2139 19 100 1 300 ŞƏMKIR YENI ABAD 472 178 3.73 2.4 1.9 2 472 3769 3769 1320 1320 506 506 34 100 1 301 ŞƏMKIR YENI HƏYAT 573 265 3.11 2.3 1.9 2 573 7058 7058 3840 3840 1135 1135 22 100 1 302 ŞƏMKIR KEÇILI 1248 293 3.08 6.3 6.3 2 1190 10063 10063 3840 3840 1631 1631 19 100 1 303 ŞƏMKIR KÖNÜLLÜ 1355 355 3 6 6 2 1355 12313 12313 2880 2880 2059 2059 30 100 1 304 ŞƏMKIR MAHMUDLU 1211 400 3.73 5.9 5.9 2 1211 12572 12572 3840 3840 1951 1951 35 100 1 305 ŞƏMKIR MORUL 1565 249 4.06 7 7 2 1565 15893 15893 3960 3960 2254 2254 29 100 1 306 ŞƏMKIR MUXTARIYYƏ 696 314 3.15 3 3 2 696 7777 7777 2640 2640 1235 1235 29 100 1 307 ŞƏMKIR SABIRKƏND 202 440 2.63 12 12 2 2002 1271 1271 660 660 241 241 34 100 1 308 ŞƏMKIR SEYFƏLI 2442 850 2 11 10.5 2 2442 16227 16227 3840 3840 4074 4074 49 100 1 309 ŞƏMKIR TƏZƏKƏND 662 196 3.85 4.8 4.8 2 662 5222 5222 2640 2640 679 679 43 100 1 310 ŞƏMKIR ÇAPARLI 1124 328 3.13 5.4 5.4 2 1124 8425 8425 3840 3840 1345 1345 29 100 1 311 ŞƏMKIR ÇINARLI 1054 250 2.63 5 5 2 1054 10484 10484 3840 3840 1994 1994 38 100 1 312 ŞƏMKIR ƏLI YAQUBLU 466 341 348 2.4 2.4 2 466 7274 7274 3840 3840 1046 1046 36 100 1 313 ŞƏMKIR Şiştəpə 2547 660 2.44 8.4 7.4 2 2547 13323 13323 3840 3840 2727 2727 26 100 1 314 HACIQABUL ABDULABAD 2570 881 1.5 12 12 1 2570 17895 17617 6720 6720 6000 6000 34 98 1 315 HACIQABUL MEYNIMAN 2970 390 1.4 11.7 11.7 1 2970 17550 15619 4200 4200 5850 5850 29 89 1 316 HACIQABUL NAVAHI 5521 1514 1.4 17.99 17.99 1 5521 26985 25430 6720 6720 8995 8995 28 94 1 317 HACIQABUL RƏNCBƏR 1788 884 1.4 3.8 3.8 1 1788 6000 5774 2550 2550 2000 2000 26 96 1 318 HACIQABUL ƏLƏTLI 1565 180 1.5 5.44 5.44 2 1565 8160 7867 3840 3840 2720 2720 52 96 1 319 HACIQABUL Qarasu 2970 717 1.5 14.54 14.54 1 5845 21800 16565 5760 5760 7270 7270 54 76 1 320 NEFTÇALA AZƏRBAYCAN 650 145 1.17 2.6 1.03 1 650 2585 1085 727.5 305 585 585 21 42 0 321 NEFTÇALA ASTANLI 1700 272 1.41 5.95 5.6 1 1700 7121 7121 1850 2134 2797 2797 57 100 1 322 NEFTÇALA AŞAĞI SURRA 2902 442 1.14 11.26 8.28 1 2750 10882 8361 2827 2242 4006 4006 65 77 1 323 NEFTÇALA BOYAT 2530 245 1.12 10.6 9.93 1 2530 10151 7444 2706 2072 2199 2199 56 73 1 324 NEFTÇALA BƏRƏKƏT 2400 228 1.55 15.9 12.9 1 2400 20881 17795 6263 5436 6249 6249 68 85 1 325 NEFTÇALA BƏRƏKƏT-N 1480 114 1.29 11.7 9.5 1 1480 12831 10994 4175 3641 4710 4710 42 86 1 326 NEFTÇALA QARAVƏLLI 501 94 1.48 12.46 17.74 1 501 15690 23632 4948 7709 8871 8871 20 151 1 Page 61 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 327 NEFTÇALA QIRMIZIKƏNQD 961 218 1.29 3.9 1.82 1 961 4309 2053 1583 753 845 845 24 48 0 328 NEFTÇALA KÜR 2000 442 1.43 19.6 11.1 1 2000 23805 14230 6960 4371 5525 5525 57 60 0 329 NEFTÇALA KÜRQARABUCAQ 2015 212 1.79 9.9 5.1 1 2015 15028 8007 3853 2066 2348 2348 50 53 0 330 NEFTÇALA MURAD 1800 186 1.43 10.97 8.89 1 1800 14208 12168 4060 3532 4447 4447 36 86 1 331 NEFTÇALA MUĞAN 2510 233 1.28 7.1 4.3 1 2510 7693 4949 1583 1017 2222 2222 56 64 1 332 NEFTÇALA NUR 2150 239 1.24 6.6 2.84 1 2150 6968 3171 2374 1080 1429 1429 48 46 0 333 NEFTÇALA SƏBUR 2500 301 1.03 12.5 3.4 1 2500 10969 3000 2777 763 1550 1550 50 27 0 334 NEFTÇALA XANMƏMMƏDLI 1619 357 1.31 4.1 3.6 1 1619 4530 4272 1583 1491 1932 1932 40 94 1 335 NEFTÇALA XƏZƏR 958 185 1.27 4.1 2.7 1 958 4382 3077 1583 1109 1367 1367 27 70 1 336 NEFTÇALA ÜFÜQ 1581 266 1.16 6.5 4.3 1 1581 6435 5018 1664 1296 2173 2173 39 78 1 337 NEFTÇALA ŞIRVANLI 1900 320 1.23 10 7.17 1 1212 10503 7939 2827 2210 3681 3681 38 76 1 338 NEFTÇALA HAQVERDILI 1329 118 1.66 5.9 3.2 1 1329 8315 4783 3070 1807 1581 1581 39 58 0 339 NEFTÇALA HƏYAT 1930 195 1.16 8.4 4.7 1 1930 8325 4906 2479 1457 2077 2077 55 59 0 340 NEFTÇALA Aqquşa 2150 210 1.19 5.84 2.78 1 2150 5929 2977 1942 974 1652 1652 48 50 0 341 SALYAN ARAN 5282 2762 1.94 27.2 27.2 2 5282 51500 30939 8880 8880 13200 13200 84 60 0 342 SALYAN ARBATAN 3270 3817 2.22 17.4 17.4 2 3270 37815 23302 6720 6720 7100 7100 71 62 0 343 SALYAN BƏRƏKƏT 2698 1209 2.44 11.4 11.4 2 2698 27353 17973 4560 4560 5700 5700 73 66 1 344 SALYAN BƏŞIRBƏYLI 1012 283 2.82 5.4 5.4 2 1012 15820 9173 4560 4560 2700 2700 47 58 0 345 SALYAN QARAÇALA 7800 4756 1.89 23 23 2 7800 41790 26315 8880 8880 11500 11500 74 63 0 346 SALYAN KÜR-ARAZ 830 671 2.66 6.4 6.4 2 830 17059 11560 3960 3960 3200 3200 47 68 1 347 SALYAN KÜRQARAQAŞLI 1620 910 2.43 9 9 2 1620 21394 13150 4320 4560 4500 4500 54 61 0 348 SALYAN KÜRSƏNGI 875 805 2.98 3.6 3.6 2 875 11850 6982 3960 3960 1800 1800 47 59 0 349 SALYAN MARIŞLI 2237 914 1.88 9.2 9.2 2 2237 17810 12325 3960 4560 4600 4600 70 69 1 350 SALYAN SARVAN 4748 2114 2.27 14.2 14.2 2 4748 31172 19264 4440 6000 7100 7100 84 62 0 351 SALYAN XURŞUD 1310 313 2.53 7.4 7.4 1 1310 20199 12895 4560 4560 3700 3700 23 64 0 352 SALYAN ŞIRVAN 4748 2114 2.27 14.2 14.2 2 4748 31172 19264 4440 6000 7100 7100 84 62 0 353 SALYAN ŞƏFA 1880 803 2.22 9.8 9.8 2 1880 21311 15625 5560 4560 4900 4900 67 73 1 354 SALYAN ŞƏFƏQ 2920 1788 2.31 10.2 10.2 2 2920 23099 16223 5040 6720 5100 5100 72 70 1 355 BƏRDƏ 32-LƏR 2609 1363 1.42 18.6 18.6 1 2609 26367 18467 3600 3600 9284 9284 35 70 1 356 BƏRDƏ ALPOUD 2360 655 1.18 14.3 14.3 1 2360 16860 11905 3600 3600 7145 7145 42 71 1 357 BƏRDƏ BOYƏHMƏDLI 2230 760 1.54 12.4 12.4 1 2230 19055 15555 5280 5280 6187 6187 44 82 1 358 BƏRDƏ BƏRƏKƏT 1530 755 1.55 10.45 10.45 1 1530 16193 12661 3600 3600 5224 5224 41 78 1 359 BƏRDƏ QARADƏMIRÇI 1170 654 1.04 8.5 8.5 1 1170 8865 8165 1800 1800 4262 4262 41 92 1 360 BƏRDƏ QARATƏPƏ 1976 105 1.49 10.4 10.4 1 1976 15515 12653 3600 3600 5207 5207 41 82 1 361 BƏRDƏ QILINCLI 2305 325 1.5 10.5 10.5 1 2305 16073 12573 3600 3600 5253 5253 44 78 1 362 BƏRDƏ YENI ƏYRICƏ 2114 1016 1.1 15.4 15.4 1 2114 16978 14178 3840 3840 7718 7718 56 84 1 363 BƏRDƏ KOLAYIR 1349 2176 1.48 7.5 7.5 1 1349 11041 8767 1920 1920 3731 3731 40 79 1 364 BƏRDƏ KÜR 1061 341 1.14 7.7 7.7 1 1061 7965 7175 1920 1920 3829 3829 41 90 1 365 BƏRDƏ KƏLƏNTƏRLI 1814 1615 1.12 12.5 12.5 1 1814 14035 12378 3480 3480 6244 6244 40 88 1 366 BƏRDƏ LƏNBƏRAN 3263 880 1.28 23.44 23.44 1 3263 30005 22682 3600 3600 11721 11721 42 76 1 367 BƏRDƏ MEHDIXANLI 1856 753 1.03 12.08 12.08 1 1856 12440 11070 1680 1680 6839 6839 42 89 1 368 BƏRDƏ MIRZƏCƏFƏRLI 2919 800 1.36 18.4 18.4 1 2919 24603 18253 4800 4800 9193 9193 43 74 1 369 BƏRDƏ NƏZIRLI 2378 453 1.52 10.1 10.1 1 2378 19195 14973 4800 4800 6314 6314 44 78 1 Page 62 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) 370 BƏRDƏ SAMUX 2356 388 1.5 11.82 11.82 2 2356 17652 14471 4920 4920 5908 5908 40 82 1 371 BƏRDƏ XANAĞALI 830 360 1.47 4.61 4.61 1 830 6783 6053 1800 1800 2307 2307 35 89 1 372 BƏRDƏ XANƏRƏB 3439 1330 1.02 24 24 1 3439 24472 20651 4560 4560 11996 11996 51 84 1 373 BƏRDƏ ŞATIRLI ARX 3194 1845 0.96 22.4 22.4 1 3194 20518 18208 3600 3600 11207 11207 42 89 1 374 BƏRDƏ HÜSEYNALILAR 2014 980 1.45 12.65 12.65 1 2014 18338 14978 4560 4560 6324 6324 41 82 1 375 BƏRDƏ HƏYƏT 2056 2776 1.52 14.05 14.05 1 2056 21364 16524 4800 4800 7028 7028 45 77 1 376 BƏRDƏ HƏSƏNQAYA 1597 640 1.1 10.45 10.45 1 1597 12474 11390 3120 3120 5670 5670 48 91 1 377 BƏRDƏ GÜLOĞLULAR 5557 7489 1.14 37.7 37.7 1 5557 42976 34164 5040 5040 18849 18849 50 79 1 378 BƏRDƏ GÖYÜŞLÜ 1226 391 1.28 7.12 7.12 1 1226 9115 8136 1920 1920 3561 3561 38 89 1 Average 3.12 281 39 Page 63 of 64 The World Bank Water Users Association Development Support Project (P107617) ANNEX 9. PHOTOS Bunyadli WUA (Beylagan Raion) Earth canal (before) Concrete lining (after) Khanarkh WUA (Khacmaz Raion) Before Concrete lining and hydraulic structures were supplied. (after) Before After Page 64 of 64