Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia;loss of asset;safety net transfer;access to asset;disaster risk management;high soil erosion rate;monitoring and evaluation plan ...  Voir la suite national food security;emergency drought recovery;agency for international development;food insecure household;safety net system;rural area;response to shock;natural resource base;food insecure people;world food programme;mother and child;acquisition of land;negative environmental impact;involuntary resettlement;compensation for land;living in poverty;rapid population growth;access to food;invasive plant species;reduction of poverty;access to health;project affected persons;improved living standard;displacement of people;rural access road;access to child;roads and water;community consultation meetings;local government staff;basic social service;land degradation process;resilience of communities;agriculture and livestock;land and water;social development outcome;animal health care;livestock production system;extensive livestock production;resources and capacity;health and nutrition;benefits of latrines;transfers in cash;amount of fund;loss of livelihood;adverse environmental impact;negative social impacts;lines of communication;cases of loss;quality of work;loss of income;Natural Resources;social accountability;crop production;watershed development;food insecurity;common standards;livelihood support;pastoral area;Management Systems;adequate compensation;land acquisition;agricultural productivity;mitigation measure;eligibility criterion;agricultural production;public consultation;non-governmental organization;crop area;community meetings;recovery rate;Performance Standards;dry savanna;Cash Transfer;food assistance;payment modality;institutional framework;administrative budget;soil fertility;community plan;food need;food transfer;conservation measure;grazing reserve;communal land;protected area;productive asset;community participation;community agreements;business planning;pending completion;administrative staff;negative reaction;private asset;private land;savings promotion;community support;community acceptance;labour intensity;dependency ratio;community land;donor finance;public agreement;beneficiary group;public use;safeguard policy;Safeguard Policies;climatic shocks;environmental problem;water point;result indicator;net payment;payment system;program beneficiary;unconditional transfers;health post;reasons given;human population;asset loss;field work;staff capacity;Public Infrastructure;traditional livelihood;agricultural labour;unequal access;population pressure;nutrition policy;community-based activities;livestock asset;agricultural practice;biotic diversity;small herd;local condition;ecosystem productivity;pastoral household;productive capacity;livelihood systems;pastoral livelihood;regional market;good environmental;biophysical environment;rainfed agriculture;agricultural area;highland areas;erosion potential;soil quality;arid landscape;subsistence farmer;livestock grazing;ethnic group;poor water;arid area;semi-arid area;agricultural labor;natural habitat;temperate forest;food aid;crop yield;biological measures;degraded areas;stream diversion;gully control;land availability;productive land;bench terracing;community needs;wood lot;underserved communities;food availability;social issue;scarce resource;Social Protection;broader community;cash support;shallow wells;water logging;health facility;latrine construction;classroom construction;water canals;small dam;farmer education;train service;livestock management;community asset;household affect;spring development;gender sensitivity;work burden;intended beneficiary;strategic location;local planning;vulnerable group;small-scale irrigation;food production;area closure;resettlement assistance;customary livelihood;market access;consultation procedure;participatory approach;monitoring arrangement;compensation measures;displaced person;impoverishment risks;Public Services;severe drought;resettlement program  Réduire