Electricity;energy survey;Energy and Mining;energy service;energy sector management assistance;nutritional status of child;household use;household energy use;energy source ...  Voir la suite multitopic household surveys;indoor air pollution;electricity source;types of energy;household welfare;energy policy analysis;household energy sector;energy and water;biomass fuel use;kerosene wick lamp;source of energy;standard of living;households with electricity;stated preference methods;energy end use;electricity service;acute respiratory disease;effect of price;energy pricing policy;flow of service;rural electrification policy;education and health;modern cooking fuels;cost of access;price of fuel;traditional solid fuel;risk of disease;income and expenditure;household demand function;public health policy;module on education;acute respiratory infection;change in status;electricity connection fee;quantity of fuel;integrated household survey;compact fluorescent lamp;benefit of service;liquefied petroleum gas;grid electricity service;source of financing;household energy expenditures;years of schooling;living standard measurement;contingent valuation method;price for electricity;rural electrification program;final consumption stage;reliability of supply;cost of energy;local service provider;level of consumption;primary energy source;age of child;unreliable energy supply;efficient energy use;block tariff structure;household survey instrument;source of income;economies of scale;types of service;fuel price subsidy;increase in expenditure;source income;energy transition;unit price;energy policies;household questionnaire;durable good;Durable goods;modern fuel;household expenditure;community questionnaire;survey data;electric light;poor household;kerosene use;demand curve;fuel type;commercial fuel;kerosene lamp;traditional fuel;energy ladder;energy infrastructure;respiratory illness;household income;socioeconomic variables;monthly expenditure;electrical appliance;fuel purchase;proxy indicator;research institution;traditional biomass;living condition;energy price;electric lamp;respiratory symptom;health status;survey questionnaire;energy specialist;end-use application;household fuel;kerosene prices;efficiency factor;research institutions;clean environment;choice model;survey sample;household consumption;space heating;primary fuel;wood stove;Child care;fuel switching;price elasticity;market vendor;prevailing price;school enrollment;food preparation;household budget;uniform tariff;agricultural practice;research literature;health facility;cooking stove;birth order;alternative policy;rural area;electricity infrastructure;change cost;national energy;improved health;utility provider;safety issue;distribution cost;average price;social capital;anthropometric data;geographical area;open fire;household interview;health clinics;traditional methods;human power;behavioral factor;household enterprise;school attendance;small sample;tax adjustment;sample design;survey design;diesel engine;pollution level;public finance;local condition;survey modules;community characteristic;safe use;survey cost;mother's age;baseline information;wood use;socioeconomic factors;panel data;individual level;productive energy;market price;behavioral change;investment cost;proxy measure;local monopoly;building material;financial resource;secure access;quality improvement;hurricane lantern;electric stove;total energy;household purchases;productive purposes;connection charge;short supply;social entity;present value;pollution indicator;housing condition;monetary indicator;household benefit;air pollutant;energy data;fuelwood stove;monthly income;distribution network;connection cost;access indicators;welfare gains;fuel supply;household bill;epidemiological study;Poverty Analysis;energy market;energy information;econometric work;energy utility;civil society;increased demand;average consumption;statistical agency;urban household;survey questions;welfare change;increase productivity;cost-benefit analysis  Réduire