danish international development;tourism sector;contribution to poverty reduction;Natural Resources;Natural Resource Management;protected area;budget planning;Budget ...  Voir la suite anagement;operations and maintenance;central government expenditure;natural resource sector;Coastal Zone Management;natural resource base;legislative framework;sustainable urban development;human resource management;park entry fees;budget execution rate;environment impact assessment;central budget allocation;private sector association;market exchange rate;declining soil fertility;joint venture agreement;gross domestic product;private sector partner;remote rural area;private sector stakeholder;climate change impact;crop and livestock;private sector activity;community forest management;national development planning;net national income;high population density;regulatory policy framework;level of capacity;national park management;international donor agencies;allocation of resource;communal area;environmental challenge;communal land;economic sector;environmental service;unsustainable use;environmental issue;budget appropriation;land degradation;development partner;trophy hunting;governmental agency;park fee;improved livelihood;soil erosion;tourism receipts;industrial investment;wildlife consumption;tourism initiatives;rural employment;poverty alleviation;low-income earner;legal framework;food processing;non-governmental organization;efficiency gain;tourism industry;external factor;draft policy;budgetary allocation;urban population;Environmental Policy;wildlife utilization;decentralization process;budget ceiling;national economy;external resource;financial resource;fiscal discipline;tourism infrastructure;policy planning;internal fund;human migration;gap analysis;budget envelope;inequitable access;rapid urbanization;Land tenure;mitigation measure;resource mobilization;civil society;financial mean;Environmental Planning;governmental action;Advisory services;budget program;limited water;cultivation technique;financial datum;pricing system;woodland resource;funding gap;pending legislation;financial commitment;financial sustainability;absorption capacity;real impact;qualified personnel;marine resource;program objectives;research data;financial service;benefit sharing;park infrastructure;resource monitoring;nature reserve;environmental damage;nature tourism;tertiary sector;coastal flood;monitoring plan;soil salination;line item;budget process;international stakeholders;land clearing;crop farm;infrastructure destruction;international tourism;data reliability;natural asset;investment assessment;good policy;field study;annual investment;statutory expenditure;local economy;global environment;donor assistance;water cycle;institutional assessment;water scarcity;water availability;full participation;cultural diversity;marine degradation;wildlife heritage;institutional change;regulatory function;resource implications;institutional adjustment;water degradation;work programmes;study including;land cover;resource depletion;adequate maintenance;management oversight;national budget;resources allocation;conservation successes;active participation;regional priority;creating incentives;wildlife population;cash payment;income growth;budget committee;income source;agricultural sector;diamond mining;water resource;investment program;institutional analysis;public funding;surface water;analytical tool;tourism activities;climate variability;clean water;land use;financial implication;investment need;tourism activity;endangered species;black rhino;community base;freehold land;rural community;surface area;Global Warming;game reserve;elephant population;legislative reform;vegetation type;collaborative partnership;land surface;conservation area;adequate procedures;accounting framework;informal sector;Agriculture;  Réduire