Albania: Trade Impact of CEFTA IN FOCUS FINANCE, COMPETITIVENESS & INNOVATION FIRM CAPABILITIES & INNOVATION © 2018 The World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org All rights reserved. This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The World Bank Group refers to the member institutions of the World Bank Group: The World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development); International Finance Corporation (IFC); and Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), which are separate and distinct legal entities each organized under its respective Articles of Agreement. We encourage use for educational and non- commercial purposes. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Directors or Executive Directors of the respective institutions of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. All queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2422; e-mail: pubrights@worldbank.org. Design & Layout: Aichin Lim Jones Photo Credits: IFC and World Bank Photo Librares Table of Contents ABSTRACT III EVOLUTION OF ALBANIAN EXPORTS TO CEFTA COUNTRIES 1 EFFECT OF CEFTA MEMBERSHIP ON ALBANIAN EXPORTS 3 TARIFF REDUCTION AS A DRIVER OF EXPORT GROWTH 4 POLICY IMPLICATIONS 5 WORKS CITED 5 ALBANIA: TRADE IMPACT OF CEFTA | I II | SUPPORTING ENTREPRENEURS AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: THE EFFECT OF ACCELERATORS AND MENTORS ON EARLY-STAGE FIRMS Abstract R egional free trade agreements (FTAs) have a sizable effect on exports and foster economic growth. While reducing tariffs in member countries, regional FTAs harmonize trade policy across regions and reduce regulation uncertainty for exporters. They are particularly important for supporting trade in isolated countries such as Albania, a transition economy in the Western Balkans. This policy note looks at the impact of membership in the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA) on Albania’s export growth. It finds that Albanian exports to CEFTA members have grown much faster than its exports to other countries. A large share of this growth is contributed by firms that did not export to CEFTA countries previously and via new exports that were among the least traded to CEFTA countries. We also measure the impact of CEFTA on Albanian exports using a gravity equation, which finds that CEFTA increased Albanian exports to member countries between 34 percent and 144 percent. ALBANIA: TRADE IMPACT OF CEFTA | III IV | SUPPORTING ENTREPRENEURS AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: THE EFFECT OF ACCELERATORS AND MENTORS ON EARLY-STAGE FIRMS Evolution of Albanian Exports to CEFTA Countries C EFTA, founded by Hungary, Poland, and former Czechoslovakia in 1992 in an effort to liberalize their economies, designates a free trade area in the Central European region. It is considered a preparatory tool for signatory countries’ EU accession (Dangerfield, 2006). At present, CEFTA is composed of seven countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Kosovo, Moldova, Montenegro, and Serbia. Prior to joining CEFTA in 2006, Albania had ratified bilateral agreements with CEFTA member countries that covered agricultural and manufactured goods tariff reduction and other essential WTO norms. The 2006 CEFTA provided additional coverage in areas like trade in services and investment law. Because its policy coverage is more uniform than that of bilateral FTAs, CEFTA is considered a more efficient tool to promote trade in the region (Adam et al., 2003). Figure 1 shows the growth of Albanian merchandize Table 1 shows the breakdown of Albania’s export exports to CEFTA and other countries in the period growth to CEFTA countries. Exports to CEFTA 2006–2016.1 Albanian exports to CEFTA countries countries grew every year except 2009,3 and (solid blue line) have increased more than fourfold, increased by a total of $369 million from 2004 despite a sharp drop in 2009 due to the global to 2012. Year to year, higher volumes in existing financial crisis. CEFTA countries’ share in Albania’s operations contributed more to export growth than export portfolio grew from 7 percent in 2006 to 14 the entry of new firms and new products onto export percent in 2016. Albanian exports to non-CEFTA markets. The median year-to-year contribution of countries (black dash line) grew to only twice their existing operations is 70 percent. Median year- initial value. The growth of Albanian exports to CEFTA countries Additional clauses covered by CEFTA: may be driven by two factors: an increase in the • Liberalization of trade in services (GATS) number of Albanian firms exporting to CEFTA • Competition policy consistent with the countries or an increase in the value existing Treaty on the Functioning of the European exporters’ trade, including cases wherein existing Union (Treaty of Rome) and related exporters export new products to CEFTA member Regulations and Directives countries, export to a new CEFTA country2, or • Investment policies increase the value of products that they were • Required ratification of a series of already exporting to a CEFTA country. intellectual property-related agreements. 1 To facilitate comparison across group of countries, we compute exports as an index, setting a 100 value for 2006. 2 For example, when an Albanian firm that previously exported only to FYR Macedonia begins to export to Serbia. 3 Amounts are in US dollars. ALBANIA: TRADE IMPACT OF CEFTA | 1 Figure 1. Albanian Exports to CEFTA vs Rest of World 500 400 CEFTA Exports (2006 = 100) Rest 300 200 100 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Year Table 1. Breakdown of Albania’s Export Growth to CEFTA Countries, 2004–2012 Period Total Change in Change in Change in New New Export New New Change in Value Due Value Due Value Due Exporters’ Operations’ Products Products Export Value to New to New to Growth Contribu- Contribu- and Firms and Firms (USD) Exporters Export in Existing tion to tion to Contribu- Contribu- (USD) Operations Operations Total Value Total Value tion to tion to (USD) (USD) Change Change Total Value Total Value (%) (%) Change (%) Change (%) 2004–2005 4,879,049 2,081,984 −2,565,379 5,362,444 42.67 −52.58 −9.91 109.91 2005–2006 2,584,708 3,598,527 −5,229,200 4,215,381 139.22 −202.31 −63.09 163.09 2006–2007 36,754,689 9,446,817 4,531,372 22,776,500 25.70 12.33 38.03 61.97 2007–2008 65,995,483 12,018,411 5,638,092 48,338,980 18.21 8.54 26.75 73.25 2008–2009 −6,295,336 12,406,677 1,584,409 −20,286,422 −197.08 −25.17 −222.25 322.25 2009–2010 64,685,754 7,891,745 14,102,387 42,691,622 12.20 21.80 34.00 66.00 2010–2011 152,064,239 32,015,053 21,770,562 98,278,624 21.05 14.32 35.37 64.63 2011–2012 48,264,336 -1,785,840 37,277,603 12,772,573 -3.70 77.24 73.54 26.46 2004–2008 110,213,929 2,933,8407 5,462,101 75,413,421 26.62 4.96 31.58 68.42 2008–2012 258,718,993 96,638,752 88,937,385 73,142,856 37.35 34.38 71.73 28.27 2004–2012 368,932,922 239,618,160 21,178,191 108,136,571 64.95 5.74 70.69 29.31 2 | ALBANIA: TRADE IMPACT OF CEFTA to-year contribution for new products and new of value before and after ratifying the agreement exporting firms is 30 percent, of which the median (Figure 2). The bottom decile of traded products, contribution of new exporters is 20 percent and of pre-CEFTA, came to represent 62 percent of new export operations, 10 percent. exports to CEFTA countries post CEFTA. Most of these products (5,081 out of 5,114) originated in We broke the period 2004-2012 down into two the least-traded products category.4 These results components, 2004–2008 and 2008–2012, in order confirm the finding by Kehoe and Ruhl (2013) that to compare Albania’s export performance pre and regional trade agreements open the way for trade in post CEFTA. In the 2004-2008 period, growth previously untraded goods. in existing operations contributed more than diversification into new products and markets. With CEFTA in force, the contribution of new products Effect of CEFTA Membership on and firms was much larger than the contribution Albanian Exports of existing operations, with new exporters’ Using 1996-2016 COMTRADE data, we estimated contributions slightly larger than the contribution of a gravity equation for two scenarios, the first of new products. CEFTA appears to have encouraged which estimates the impact of CEFTA over and more firms to become exporters; some of these above that of the bilateral FTAs it replaced, and new firms increased the value of their exports very the second of which captures the full effect of free quickly. New exporters’ contribution to Albanian trade agreements in the region by treating CEFTA export growth over the eight years in which CEFTA as an extension of the bilateral FTAs. We find that has been in force is remarkably larger than is the signing CEFTA had a positive effect on Albania’s case in other CEFTA member countries. exports, even when controlling for the effect of the bilateral FTAs it replaced. Notably, joining CEFTA To discover which export products experienced increased Albania’s exports to these countries by the greatest growth, we sorted Albania’s export 34 percent. Signing the CEFTA increased Albania’s products into deciles and compared each set’s share export to Bosnia and Herzegovina by a factor Figure 2. Export share of product sets pre and post-CEFTA signing. 6 Fraction of 2013-2015 Export Value 4 2 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 Cumulative Fraction of the 2003-2005 Export Value 4 4,845 products had a zero-export value before the CEFTA agreement was signed. ALBANIA: TRADE IMPACT OF CEFTA | 3 six and more than doubled the value of Albanian 6 percent in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 5 percent exports to Serbia and Montenegro, but had no effect in Moldova. These tariffs then declined in all CEFTA on Albania’s exports to Macedonia and Moldova. countries, especially from 2007 onwards. By 2016, tariffs on Albanian imports were zero or nearly According to the second estimation, in the absence zero in all CEFTA countries. Until 2015, tariffs on of previous bilateral FTAs, CEFTA would have Albanian agricultural products were higher than multiplied Albania’s exports to member countries on non-agricultural products; agricultural tariffs by 2.4 (144 percent). This coefficient is larger also persisted longer than tariffs for other goods than the mean 0.59 coefficient reported by Head (Figure 4).5 and Mayer (2014) for regional trade agreements, which suggests the importance of trade agreements We assess whether the change in tariffs led to a for historically isolated economies like Albania. change in the value of imports from Albania in Whilst the bilateral FTAs helped grow Albania’s the years 2001 to 2016, controlling for import exports, CEFTA had an additional positive effect, destination, industry, and year effects. Regression suggesting that a uniform trade agreement across results indicate that the reduction in tariffs led to the region encourages even stronger export growth. a significant 525 percent increase in Albanian imports to CEFTA countries over the entire period of analysis. The average tariff imposed by CEFTA Tariff Reduction as a Driver of countries on Albanian imports fell from 10.49 Export Growth percent in 2001 to 3.76 percent in 2006, the year Figure 3 shows the evolution of the average tariff before the CEFTA went into force. We estimate imposed on Albanian imports by CEFTA member that CEFTA countries increased their imports from states. In the early 2000s, Albanian imports were Albania by 188 percent after 2006, suggesting that subjected to tariffs of around 15 percent in FYR the harmonized CEFTA policies further increased Macedonia, 14 percent in Serbia and Montenegro, trade between CEFTA member countries. Figure 3. Evolution of Tariffs on Albanian Goods 15 Average Advalorem Tariff (%) Non-agricultural 10 Agriculture 5 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year 5 We define agricultural products as goods listed in the Harmonized System classification 2-digit chapters 1 to 15. 4 | ALBANIA: TRADE IMPACT OF CEFTA Figure 4. Tariffs on Agricultural vs Non-agricultural Products 15 Average Advalorem Tariff (%) Macedonia 10 Bosnia & Herzegovina 5 Serbia Moldova Montenegro 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Policy Implications Dangerfield, M. (2006). “Sub-regional integration and EU enlargement: Where next for CEFTA?” The results of this study show that regional trade Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 2, 305-324. agreements can be an effective tool for promoting De Benedictis, L., De Santis, R. and Vicarelli, trade between member countries, in terms both of C. (2005). “Hub-and-Spoke or Else? Free Trade absolute value and of attracting new export products Agreements in the `Enlarged´ European Union”, and exporter firms. Albania’s exports to CEFTA The European Journal of Comparative Economics, countries have increased more than fourfold since 2, 2, 245-260. the agreement was signed in 2006; a large share of this growth was attributed to Albanian firms that International Monetary Fund (2014). “Sustaining did not previously export to CEFTA countries and Long-Run Growth and Macroeconomic Stability to products that were among the least traded before in Low-Income Countries – the Role of Structural the regional trade agreement came into force. A Transformation and Diversification”. IMF Policy Paper. diversified export base, such as that developing Kehoe, T.J. and Ruhl, K.J. (2013). “How Important in Albania, provides stable export revenues that is the New Goods Margin in International Trade?”, can weather price fluctuations (IMF, 2014) and Journal of Political Economy, 121, 2, 358-392. increases export growth (Bernard et al, 2009). This policy brief summarizes the findings of The Our gravity model showed that CEFTA increased the Trade Effects of Albania’s Trade Agreements with value of Albanian exports by 34 percent if we codify CEFTA Members, prepared by Jieun Choi and the FTAs that preceded the CEFTA as active, and by Asier Amondo, upon request of the Albania MoFE, 144 percent if we codify them as extinct, suggesting under the IFC Albania Agriculture Competitiveness that upgrading to a regional agreement gave Albania’s and Invesment Climate project (IFC P600476). export performance an additional push. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect Works Cited the views of the Directors or Executive Directors of the respective institutions of the World Bank Group Bernard, A.B., Jensen, J.B., Redding, S.J. and Schott, or the governments they represent. The World Bank P.K. (2009). “The Margins of US Trade”, American Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 99, 2, included in this work. 487-493. ALBANIA: TRADE IMPACT OF CEFTA | 5 Contact Jieun Choi, Senior Economist, FCI GP (jieunchoi@worldbank.org) Laureta Qorlazja, IFC Country Officer, Albania Damien Shiels, Practice manager, FCI GP