The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) Integrated Safeguards Data Sheet Restructuring Stage Restructuring Stage | Date ISDS Prepared/Updated: 25-Jul-2019| Report No: ISDSR27579 Regional Vice President: Cyril E Muller Country Director: Satu Kristiina J. Kahkonen Regional Director: Guangzhe Chen Practice Manager/Manager: Karla Gonzalez Carvajal Task Team Leader: Fiona J Collin The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) . I. BASIC INFORMATION 1. BASIC PROJECT DATA Project ID Project Name SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Task Team Leader(s) Country Fiona J Collin Ukraine Approval Date Environmental Category 20-Sep-2012 Full Assessment (A) Managing Unit Is this a Repeater project? IECT1 Yes PROJECT FINANCING DATA (US$, Millions) SUMMARY -NewFin1 Total Project Cost 540.00 Total Financing 540.00 Financing Gap 0.00 DETAILS -NewFinEnh1 World Bank Group Financing International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) 450.00 Non-World Bank Group Financing Counterpart Funding 90.00 Borrower/Recipient 90.00 2. PROJECT INFORMATION The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) Current Project Development Objective The objectives of the Project are an improved condition and quality of sections of the M-03 road and increased safety on roads in Ukraine. . 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This ISDS has been updated ahead of a proposed restructuring of the Second Road and Safety Improvement Project (RSIP2). Although this restructuring paper relates to RSIP2, this is proposed as a simultaneous and co-dependent re-structuring of both RSIP2 and the Road Sector Development Project (RSDP). A separate restructuring paper has been prepared for RSDP. In summary, the restructurings would:– a. Move M-03 Lots 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 from RSIP2 to RSDP. b. Move the M12 sub-component from RSIP2 to RSDP. The current Works components for RSIP2 are shown on the maps in the Annex and summarized in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 – WORKS COMPONENT BEFORE RESTRUCTURING Length Road Location Description (km) M-03 Km 210 - 220.782 10.78 M-03 Linear sections (Lots 2.1) M-03 Km 228 - 239.317 11.32 M-03 Linear Sections (Lot 2.2) M-03 Km 258 - 275 17.00 M-03 Linear sections (Lots 2.3) M-03 Km 282 - 300.55 18.55 M-03 Linear sections (Lots 2.4) M-03 Km 300.55 - 323 & Km 329.05 - 333.25 22.45 M-03 Linear sections (Lots 2.5) M-03 Km 220.782 - 228 7.22 M-03 Pokrovska Bagachka Bypass. Lot 2.7 M-03 Km 275 - 282 11.32 M-03 Krasnogorivka bypass - Lot 2.8 M-03 Km 333.8 - 339.3 5.50 M-03 Poltava Bypass - Lot 2.9 M-12 Km 291.24 - 332.052 40.81 M-12, Vinnytsia - Khmelnytski The proposed Works component (after re-structuring) for RSIP2 are shown on the maps in the Annex and summarized in Table 2 below. This indicates that M3 Lots 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4; and the M12 section; are all proposed to be removed from RSIP2 (and restructured into RSDP). The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) TABLE 2 – WORKS COMPONENT AFTER RESTRUCTURING AND CURRENT PROGRESS Length Road Location Description (km) M-03 Km 210 - 220.782 10.78 M-03 Linear sections (Lot 2.1) M-03 Km 300.55 - 323 & Km 329.05 - 333.25 22.45 M-03 Linear sections (Lot 2.5) M-03 Km 220.782 - 228 7.22 M-03 Pokrovska Bagachka Bypass. (Lot 2.7) M-03 Km 275 - 282 11.32 M-03 Krasnogorivka bypass (Lot 2.8) M-03 Km 333.8 - 339.3 5.50 M-03 Poltava Bypass (Lot 2.9) Move M-03 Lots 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 from RSIP2 to RSDP. After re-structuring, M-03 Lots 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 would be not be financed from RSIP2 (they would be financed from RSDP). Lots 2.1 and 2.5 would continue to be financed from RSIP2. These sections (M-03 Lots 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5) were recently re-tendered for the third time under RSIP2. Works under the first and second procurement processes were left incomplete after poor performance by the first two contractors involved. The five contracts have just been awarded, and it is proposed that Lots 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 are financed from RSDP, leaving Lots 2.1 and 2.5 under RSIP2. Such an approach will allow to maximize disbursements during the summer and fall construction season this calendar year, and should lead to full utilization of the remaining funds under RSIP2. Cancel M-12 from RSIP2 and re-include it under RSDP The M-12 work is currently financed under RSIP2. However, the M-12 contract was recently terminated due to poor performance by the contractor. The Bidding Documents are being revised to address the impacts of the termination, and re-tendering will be initiated shortly. However, there would be insufficient time to complete the M-12 works under RSIP2, indeed, it would barely commence. It is therefore proposed to re-structure this sub-component into RSDP, where completion of the works would be achievable before the existing RSDP LCD. Safeguards The proposed restructuring does not envisage any changes to the applied environmental and social safeguards instruments and does not trigger any new Operational Policies. The safeguards instruments prepared under the project (the ESMF, RPF and site specific ESIA, ESMPs, and RAPs) will continue be applied to address all potential environmental and social impacts and risks and there is no need to update or revise them. All the safeguards documents prepared and cleared under RSIP II covering both M03 and M12 sections remain valid after restructuring. See also Table 3 below. Ukravtodor (Ukrainian Government Agency responsible for the network of national roads) is responsible for overall implementation of the project while day to day project management is the responsibility of “Ukrdorinvest� (the Project Implementation Unit (PIU)) which is implementing currently a series of the WB/EBRD/EIB projects, being responsible for all fiduciary issues, including compliance with environmental and social safeguards. The PIU hired designated full-time Environmental and Social Safeguards Specialists which work in close collaboration with the road design institute, local authorities and the Road Service of Poltava oblast. Additionally, both Contractors and The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) Supervision Engineers have dedicated environmental staff to oversee the implementation of approved C-ESMPs, including a robust grievance management mechanism. Table 3 Project Road Lot Document / Instrument * Disclosure date RSIP 2 M-03 2.1 – 2.5 (linear sections) RPF March 2012 2.7-2.9 (bypasses) RAP March 2012 RAP Addendum (small business in Khorol) October 2012 (Note – Lots 2.2, 2.3 and Lots 2.1 – 2.5 2.4 move to RSDP after RAP Addendum for Lots 2.7, 2.8 and 2.9 December 2017 restructuring) ** RAP Addendum for Lots 2.7, 2.8 amd 2.9 April 2019 ESMP and monitoring plan January 2007 Environmental impact assessment for lots January 2007 2.1 – 2.5 (linear sections) Environmental impact assessment for lots January 2011 2.7 and 2.8 Environmental impact assessment for January 2011 lot 2.9 Framework addendum to ESMP and March 2012 monitoring plan Specific ESMP for lot 2.7 & Hearings December 2017 Specific ESMP for lot 2.8 & Hearings December 2017 Specific ESMP for lot 2.9 & Hearings December 2017 CESMP for lots 2.7-2.9 September 2018 Updated ESMP for lots 2.1 – 2.5 January-February (linear sections) 2019 M-12 Km 291+240 – Km 332+052 ESMP and monitoring Plan September 2018 ** Hearings October 2018 A-RAP September 2018 Hearings October 2018 * Note that all instruments will remain valid after re-structuring. ** Note that M-03 Lots 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and M-12 will move to RSDP after restructuring. The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) . 4. PROJECT LOCATION AND SALIENT PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS RELEVANT TO THE SAFEGUARD ANALYSIS (IF KNOWN) The M-03 road is one of the main corridors in the country and mainly consists of category II road (two lanes with asphalt-concrete pavement). Some sections are Category I standard (four lanes with asphalt-concrete pavement and dividing strip). The project will finance reconstruction (widening) of the road from two to four lanes, and construction of associated road infrastructure (bridges, culverts, underpasses for cattle, crossings, etc.). Three bypasses will be constructed (new construction). Lot Location Length (km) Type of works 2.1 210+000 to 220+782 10.8 Widening to four lanes 2.5 300+550 to 323+000 22.5 Rehabilitation of four lanes 2.7 220+782 to 228+000 7.2 Bypass of Pokrovska Bagachka village and road safety improvements (section is finished, road is operational at the time of this ISDS drafting) 2.8 275+000 to 282+000 7.0 Bypass of Krasnogorivka village and road safety improvements 2.9 333+800 to 339+300 11.5 First phase of bypass of Poltava city The road passes mainly through the landscapes which have been significantly modified by human activities during the last centuries. The terrain is flat, lowland agricultural land: large-scale farming has dominated land use for several decades. The landscape was also significantly modified by the development of infrastructure associated with large-scale agribusiness, populated villages and towns along the road (private housing, shops, public buildings and various local infrastructure facilities). There are few railway lines crossings which will require grade separation and bridges over small and medium rivers, the biggest one being Psel. In addition, the existing main road between Poltava and Kharkiv was constructed more than 60 years ago and has changed the landscape and local ecosystems in the broader road corridor. The ecosystems and biological communities have been historically affected by the above economic and social activities, and the road reconstruction works generally do not result in significant conversion or degradation of natural habitats. Forested land in the project area do not represent natural forests or related natural habitats. The predominant type of land use in the project area is agricultural and not dependent on forest cover. The project may potentially affect only small segments of fore 5. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS SPECIALISTS ON THE TEAM Arcadii Capcelea, Environmental Specialist Mohamed Ghani Razaak, Social Specialist Mariia Nikitova, Social Specialist SAFEGUARD_TABLE 6. SAFEGUARD POLICIES TRIGGERED Safeguard Policies Triggered Explanation Widening of the M-03 road sections and capital repairs will be undertaken within the existing right of way of the road and environmental impacts can be mitigated by good construction and housekeeping practices. All bypasses to be built Environmental Assessment (OP) (BP 4.01) Yes under the RSIP2 will go through farmland and partially through forested areas (planted forests with low-value species). No protected areas will be affected by the project. An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA/OVOS) for the new sections of the road (bypasses) was prepared by the client, since The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) those bypasses were not covered in the original EIA carried out in 2007. An Addendum to existing Framework EMP was prepared by UKRAVTODOR and serves as a framework for preparation of site- specific ESMPs and C-ESMPs. The EIA/OVOS and the Addendum to the Framework EMP were disclosed by Ukravtodor and by Poltava oblast administration and public hearings were organized. C-ESMPs for bypasses were approved and consulted upon in September 2018. Performance Standards for Private Sector This Policy is not applicable to the project therefore No Activities OP/BP 4.03 not triggered. The project activities will not result in significant Natural Habitats (OP) (BP 4.04) No conversion or degradation of natural habitats. The project may require limited cut of trees for the construction of bypasses. The forested land Forests (OP) (BP 4.36) No potentially affected by the project is planted with low-value tree species. Based on the this, OP 4.36 is not triggered. The project activities do not use or promote use of Pest Management (OP 4.09) No pesticides. The project activities will not haver any impacts on Physical Cultural Resources (OP) (BP 4.11) No Physical Cultural Resources. Indigenous Peoples (OP) (BP 4.10) No No indigenous peoples in Ukraine. Land acquisition under the Project is governed by a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) approved by the Bank. A Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) was prepared in March 2012 in accordance with the RPF for 104 land parcels required under Component 1. Acquisition and associated resettlement for 10 of these parcels has been completed in a manner satisfactory to the Bank, using counterpart funds. In addition, 60 parcels for about 24 ha will be needed to complete one of the by-passes under component 1, which are also proposed to be financed by the loan. Under component 2, it is anticipated that additional Involuntary Resettlement (OP) (BP 4.12) Yes parcels for a total of approximately 1 hectare in size will need to be acquired. In both cases, a RAP has not yet been completed, but will be prepared in accordance with the Project RPF. In short, about 155 parcels remain to be acquired, comprising approximately 125 hectares. The landowners to be affected by these acquisitions have been offered the option of land swap (with equivalent price and properties) or monetary compensation. They have agreed in principle to sell their lands for the purpose of the works and notarized consents have already been received for the lands to be acquired under The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) component 1. As of now, final agreements on purchase prices are being finalized following the valuation process detailed below and consistent with the provisions of the RAP for component 1. The process is less advanced for the lands to be acquired to complete the third by-pass under component 1 and the one to be acquired under component 2, where the final design of the road still needs to be concluded. None of the land acquisitions that are the subject of this memorandum are expected to result in physical resettlement. The project activities do not involve any works at or Safety of Dams (OP) (BP 4.37) No closer to dams as defined in the Policy. The project does not include activities which impact Projects on International Waterways (OP) No water bodies related with international waterways (BP 7.50) as defined in the Policy. Projects in Disputed Areas (OP) (BP 7.60) No The project is not located in Disputed Areas. KEY_POLICY_TABLE II. KEY SAFEGUARD POLICY ISSUES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT A. SUMMARY OF KEY SAFEGUARD ISSUES 1. Describe any safeguard issues and impacts associated with the Restructured project. Identify and describe any potential large scale, significant and/or irreversible impacts. Environmental: The potential environmental impacts under restructuring RSDP will remain the same and mainly be caused by road widening and road infrastructure safety improvements and will be located to a large extent within the existing right of way of the road. These impacts are well known and include air pollution and noise from trucks, other construction machinery, and asphalt plants; soil disturbance; tree-cutting (low value species on the roadside); and impacts on surface water networks (siltation, accidental pollution); labor safety issues; etc. No protected areas and no physical cultural resources will be affected by the project. Social: Social safeguard issues are associated with land acquisition necessary for construction of bypasses and interchanges, and for road widening. Land acquisition will affect mostly agricultural land. According to the original RAP prepared in March 2012 there were two cases with single-family houses being affected due to road widening (village of Belotserkivka, and village of Konoplianka). The two owners have expressed their desire to be offered alternative housing - one, within the same village, and the other in a neighboring village. They were provided the houses of a greater value and with improved living conditions in the location of their choice, in addition they were provided assistance in relocation. The construction of the bypasses is going to improve safety in the settlements and provide better conditions for public transport users safer waiting areas, lighted road crossings). The upgrading of the M-03 road to highway standards may have negative impact on the local communities’ access to basic facilities, communal pastures, etc. In order to mitigate these effects the consultations have been held at the design stage to ensure that the needs of the local communities are reflected in the design of the road. Based on the regular consultations with the local stakeholders from the technical design of the project was revised to address the proposals (building cattle pass, additional bus stop) as additional land was required for this purposes. Respective Addendum to the RAP were prepared and approved in October 2012, December 2017 and April 2019. The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) 2. Describe any potential indirect and/or long term impacts due to anticipated future activities in the project area. The project will not have indirect negative impacts, but will rather result in environmental, social and operational benefits due to improved access to markets and services, better vehicle operational conditions and better road safety. The project will also contribute to increased safety for pedestrians and for inhabitants of the villages along the road, especially in cases where bypasses will be constructed. 3. Describe any potential alternatives (if relevant) considered to help avoid or minimize adverse impacts. The proposed design of the road was chosen based on careful review of potential alternatives. The proposed specific location of the road includes sections (i) for road rehabilitation of the existing four lanes and (ii) for widening from two to four lanes, within the existing right of way and (iii) for the construction of new bypasses where road upgrading within the boundaries of •villages/towns was not possible due to potential large-scale resettlement. Bypasses are also justified because they increase road safety for village residents. Based on the consultations with the local stakeholders the alternative safety measure for local population were introduced such as cattle pass on lot 2.8, commercial vehicles tunnel on lot 2.7, pedestrian tunnel on lot 2.4. 4. Describe measures taken by the borrower to address safeguard policy issues. Provide an assessment of borrower capacity to plan and implement the measures described. Environmental: To address potential environmental impacts the client will apply the framework EIA, prepared under the initial project, - the restructuring project doesn't involve any changes in project environmental category or will trigger new WB Operational Policies. This corridor-specific Environmental Impact Assessment/OVOS (EIA/OVOS 2007) prepared in 2007 is documenting baseline conditions and environmental risks for the whole road Kyiv-Poltava (M- 03). Based on this EIA/OVOS, a Framework Environmental Management Plan (EMP) was prepared (2007), disclosed and publicly consulted with all interested parties and representatives from the local population. Given that most of the road sections (except bypasses) proposed for financing under RSIP2 were already covered by this earlier EIA/OVOS 2007, the client carried out the EIA/OVOS for the new sections/bypasses of the road in January 2011. Subsequently, Framework addendum to the ESMP was made and approved by the Bank in March 2012. Site-specific ESMPs for bypasses were developed and approved in December 2017, with C-ESMPs for the same bypasses being approved and consulted upon in September 2018. Site-specific ESMPs for Lots 2.1 and 2.5 (rehabilitation and road safety improvements for linear section of M-03 road) were updated and approved in February 2019. Ukravtodor (Ukrainian Government Agency responsible for the network of national roads) is responsible for overall implementation of the project while day to day project management is the responsibility of “Ukrdorinvest� (the Project Implementation Unit (PIU)) which is implementing currently a series of the WB/EBRD/EIB projects, being responsible for all fiduciary issues, including compliance with environmental and social safeguards. The PIU hired designated full-time Environmental and Social Safeguards Specialists which work in close collaboration with the road design institute, local authorities and the Road Service of Poltava oblast. Additionally, both Contractors and Supervision Engineers have dedicated environmental staff to oversee the implementation of approved C-ESMPs, including a robust grievance management mechanism. Overall the compliance of implemented until now civil works are satisfactory and only few non-compliance cases have been reported. The great majority of these cases are minor and only one was at larger scale, occured in June 2019, when during dismantling of the bridge over river Psel (Lot 2.8) about 10 cubic meters of polystyrene fell to the river (the polysterene was not marked on design drawings - hence the Contractor not being prepared for its occurrence). The collaborative effort between the contractor, the supervision engineer and Ukrdorinvest led to an orderly organized response campaign, collection of loose polystyrene to the satisfaction of all interested parties (including administrative bodies). The river water was tested afterwards with no remaining pollution registered, the Contractor has drawn up the SCAP report and proposed prevention/mitigation measures were communicated across all ongoing contracts of UKRDORINVEST. The incident was reported through ESIRT. The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) There were reported also a number of traffic safety related incidents, however, none of them were project-related. Still, the Contractor, the supervision engineer and Ukrdorinvest are working closely to improve the situation with road safety during construction. Barring the aforementioned incidents, regular supervision missions by the Bank Team showed that the existing environmental safeguards management arrangements are functioning appropriately, with occasional minor noncompliances being corrected swiftly and diligently. On all working places the contractors have installed road warning signs on on-going rehabilitation works and on traffic diversion. In terms of labor safety issues, the contractors have provided special training on health and occupational safety to all personnel. There are evidences that the H&S mitigation measures are implemented on site (lighting installed, first aid kits visible, PPE provided etc.). Social: Resettlement Framework was prepared in March 2012.The RAP for Component 1 of the RSIP2 has been completed in March 2012, covering the road sections where land acquisition and/or resettlement was expected. However, during the implementation of the project and based on regular consultations with the local stakeholders the technical design of the project was revised to address the proposals (building cattle pass, additional bus stop) as additional land was required for this purposes. Respective two Addendum to the RAP were prepared and approved in October 2012, December 2017 and April 2019. UKRAVTODOR made significant effort to comply with safeguards requirements including public consultations on regular basis with the local communities along the road (with Contractor’s and Supervision Engineer's participation) and maintaining a robust GRM at field level. It has designated a staff member to monitor land acquisition / resettlement to be carries out under the RSIP2 and report to the PIU and the World Bank any potential irregularities and shortcomings during the implementation of the Resettlement Action Plan - both with respect to identified impacts, or related to additional unexpected negative impacts occurring in the course of the project. For the sections of the road where the works have already started the land acquisition is successfully completed and compensations paid. UKRAVTODOR will also rely on close cooperation with regional authorities and the Poltava road service for monitoring resettlement and compensations of PAPs in sub-projects. For land acquisition and resettlement, each six months the Poltava region road service will select a random sample of cases, visit each, and report on the progress of land acquisition and resettlement. The results will be summarized in a report to the project managers and the Bank which uses key performance indicators selected by the project and agreed in the RAP as reporting topics. 5. Identify the key stakeholders and describe the mechanism for consultation and disclosure on safeguard policies, with an emphasis on potentially affected people. There are 83 communities in the area affected by the project, the majority of which are situated outside the immediate vicinity of the road as such. The affected population of villages and towns in the area affected by the road constitutes about 230.000 people, or 793 inhabitants per kilometer of road. Key stakeholder groups are: (a) the residents of areas affected by the road, (b) individuals and legal entities which will work on the construction of the road, and (c ) individuals and legal entities in the project area which benefit from using the M03 road.• Following the requirements for Category A projects, public consultations on the TOR for EA/OVOS were organized in five project locations (Lubny, Khorol, Bilkotserkivka, Poltava, Reshetylivka) in October 2011. Public consultations on the draft EIA/OVOS reports were organized on November 14, 2011 with participation of representatives of all rayons of the area of prospective construction. Key data and findings of these EIA/OVOS reports were used for preparation of the Framework Addendum to EMP. Public consultations on the Framework Addendum to EMP and Resettlement Policy Framework were organized by the client on December 23, 2011. Consultations with PAPs was held at different times of project implementation, after the initial processes during preparation of RPF and RAP (consultations were done December 2011), in addition to individual consultations during site visits and or upon receipt of communications or claims of ownership and or grievances. Special public The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) consultations were held under the aegis of the local administration and community members in each bypass separately. Both newly and previously affected persons and other member from the local communities participated in these consultations. The participants were provided with project information and other related information pertaining land acquisition, including the design changes (wherever applicable), implementation and completion schedules, in addition to project-specific entitlements, the Government Decree on the GRM and steps for submission of ownership claims, if any, on lands within the RoW of the alignment, to facilitate land acquisition and disbursement of compensation. RAP Addendum dated October 2012 (public consultations April 2012 and October 2012), RAP Addendum dated December 2017 (public consultations were held separately under each bypass during November/December 2017), RAP Addendum dated April 2019 (public consultations with the affected parties were held in November 2018 and January 2019). Designated Social Safeguards Specialist of UKRAVTODOR is responsible for holding public consultations on regular basis with the local communities along the road (with Contractor’s and Supervision Engineer's participation) and maintaining a robust GRM at field level. DISCLOSURE_TABLE B. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS ENV_TABLE Environmental Assessment/Audit/Management Plan/Other Date of receipt by the Bank Date of submission for disclosure 09-Dec-2011 15-Mar-2012 For Category ‘A’ projects, date of distributing the Executive Summary of the EA to the Executive Directors “In country� Disclosure Country Date of Disclosure Ukraine 23-Dec-2011 Comments RESETTLE_TA BLE Resettlement Action Plan/Framework Policy Process Date of receipt by the Bank Date of submission for disclosure 22-Feb-2012 23-Feb-2012 “In country� Disclosure Country Date of Disclosure Ukraine 22-Feb-2012 Comments The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) COMPLIANCE_TABLE C. COMPLIANCE MONITORING INDICATORS AT THE CORPORATE LEVEL EA_TABLE OP/BP/GP 4.01 - Environment Assessment Does the project require a stand-alone EA (including EMP) report? Yes If yes, then did the Regional Environment Unit or Practice Manager (PM) review Yes and approve the EA report? Are the cost and the accountabilities for the EMP incorporated in the credit/loan? Yes IR_TABLE OP/BP 4.12 - Involuntary Resettlement Has a resettlement plan/abbreviated plan/policy framework/process framework (as appropriate) been prepared? If yes, then did the Regional unit responsible for safeguards or Practice Manager review the plan? PDI_TABLE The World Bank Policy on Disclosure of Information Have relevant safeguard policies documents been sent to the World Bank for Yes disclosure? Have relevant documents been disclosed in-country in a public place in a form and language that are understandable and accessible to project-affected groups Yes and local NGOs? ALL_TABLE All Safeguard Policies Have satisfactory calendar, budget and clear institutional responsibilities been Yes prepared for the implementation of measures related to safeguard policies? Have costs related to safeguard policy measures been included in the project Yes cost? Does the Monitoring and Evaluation system of the project include the monitoring Yes of safeguard impacts and measures related to safeguard policies? Have satisfactory implementation arrangements been agreed with the borrower Yes and the same been adequately reflected in the project legal documents? III. APPROVALS The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156) Fiona J Collin Task Team Leader(s) Yevhen Bulakh Approved By Safeguards Advisor Nina Chee 23-Oct-2019 Practice Manager/Manager Karla Gonzalez Carvajal 25-Oct-2019 . The World Bank RESTRUCTURING ISDS SECOND ROAD AND SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (P127156)