Skip to Main Navigation

An assessment of the investment climate in Botswana (Vol. 2) : Detailed results and econometric analysis (anglais)

The objective of the Botswana Investment Climate Assessment (ICA) is to evaluate the investment climate in Botswana in all its operational dimensions and promote policies to strengthen the private sector. The investment climate is made up of the many location specific factors that shape the opportunities and incentives for firms to invest productively, create jobs, and expand. These factors include macroeconomic and regulatory policies; the security of property rights and the rule of law; and the quality of supporting institutions such as physical and financial infrastructure. The main sources of information for the ICA are two firm-level surveys. The first survey covered Small, Medium, and Large Enterprises (SMLEs) with five or more employees in retail trade, manufacturing, and other services. The second covered micro enterprise with fewer than five employees in the same sectors. Information from the survey is supplemented with information from other sources, including the doing business report; analytical reports by the World Bank, the international monetary fund, other international organizations and the Government of Botswana; and academic papers and reports. Although the analysis in this report suggests that there are some areas where the investment climate might be improved, it is important to note none of these problems with the possible exception of worker skills appear to be particularly debilitating. This suggests that other factors are probably also playing a role. One such factor is likely to be the small size (in terms of population) and remoteness of the economy. Another factor is the effect that is the macroeconomic effects of the large mining economy has on the competitiveness of the rest of the economy. Improving living standards and cutting poverty depends on broad-based economic growth, which will only take place when firms improve worker productivity by investing in human and physical capital and technological capacity. But firms will only invest when the investment climate is favorable.


  • Date du document


  • Type de document

    Évaluation du climat de l’investissement (ICA)

  • Numéro du rapport


  • Volume


  • Total Volume(s)


  • Pays


  • Région


  • Date de publication


  • Disclosure Status


  • Titre du rapport

    Detailed results and econometric analysis

  • Mots clé

    labor productivity;Cost of Doing Business;Southern African Customs Union;Upper Middle Income Countries;real exchange rate appreciation;machinery and equipment;comparator country;total factor productivity;capital per worker;unit labor costs;capital productivity;output per worker;access to finance;natural resource sector;corporate tax rate;firm performance;formal sector employment;hiv infection rate;effect of size;production and export;number of workers;medium sized firms;high oil price;abundant natural resource;antenatal care clinic;long-term economic growth;private sector credit;good investment climate;net book value;per capita income;Rule of Law;term of productivity;access to land;security of property;common external tariff;cross country comparison;types of firms;cost of capital;cost of labor;investment in knowledge;foreign owned enterprise;Manufacturing;dutch disease;Exchange Rates;capacity utilization;retail trade;international market;cross-country comparison;Bank Credit;manufacturing sector;human capital;middle-income economy;diamond mining;Learning and Innovation Credit;firm productivity;light manufacturing;Natural Resources;tax revenue;access indicators;inflationary pressure;capital stock;manufactured goods;econometric methodology;tradable good;foreign company;large enterprise;mineral revenue;economic diversification;manufacturing enterprise;intermediate input;capital intensity;raw material;retail establishment;government spending;point estimate;labor use;organizational structure;regression analysis;extreme poverty;financial service;food sector;tax incentive;sample survey;econometric result;technological capacity;primary goods;aids epidemic;estimation technique;worker productivity;hiv prevalence;wage structure;epidemiological study;university degree;net impact;primary product;management efficiency;production function;living standard;summary statistic;export status;previous subsection;maximum amount;smaller share;estimation method;fixed factors;firing workers;export market;informal sector;foreign buyer;frontier estimation;modern equipment;inflation rate;agricultural good;Financial Sector;expected return;Labor Market;regulatory environment;common custom;government income;agricultural production;foreign exchange;Macroeconomic Management;tradable sector;income increase;higher growth;unemployed labor;trade regime;collected information;institutional environment;firm-level survey;good policy;government revenue;manufacturing industry;business degree;Vocational Training;sampling frame;budgetary process;aids program;budget allocation;enterprise survey;audited account;company account;capital use;high wage;dollar term;unemployed worker;theoretical model;informal firms;currency appreciation;currency basket;pension system;residential area;banking system;macroeconomic instability;social indicator;loan application;management ability;gdp deflator;survey period;Macroeconomic Stability;prevention activities;labor intensity;firm size;production technology;formal employment;energy cost;temporary worker;micro-enterprise access;



Version officielle du document (peut inclure des signatures etc…)