care needs;ex post evaluation;Transparency in Public Sector;skill need;evaluation capacity;public sector reform;strategy and resource;Public Expenditure Management;purpose ...  Voir la suite of evaluation;series of seminars;exchanges of experience;availability of resource;human resource development;quality of information;private sector professionals;external funding agency;organization of work;total quality management;institutional development strategy;resource allocation process;development of capacity;culture of accountability;public expenditure control;public sector administration;areas of work;quality assurance mechanism;planning activity;quality of public;community at large;national resource allocation;senior government official;standard of transparency;Check and Balances;level of policy;sustainable human development;bilateral donor agency;feedback of lessons;international commodity price;source of idea;women in development;transparent public expenditure;donor agencies;management tool;civil society;african administration;institutional environment;evaluation system;external resource;feedback systems;regional network;evaluation activity;financial resource;foreign affair;donor support;introductory statement;national capacity;donor community;policy formulation;good governance;political support;development cooperation;socioeconomic development;lending agency;donor institution;grassroots movement;private investor;formal linkage;domestic demand;public action;Budget Management;policy option;public fund;ministerial department;development partnership;legal mandate;evaluation culture;traditional model;management function;administrative authority;marketing tool;domestic capital;learning process;local expertise;accountability system;government machinery;external assistance;adequate protection;national governance;monitoring function;public resource;cooperative activity;fund activity;performance criteria;reform effort;coherent approach;program performance;participating country;individual sectors;evaluation method;aid agency;primary purpose;administrative framework;program monitoring;national authority;weak demand;budget allocation;exchange network;beneficiary country;bilateral aid;quantitative techniques;democratic reform;staff development;professional capacity;evaluation result;building access;data management;systems approach;career track;individual responsibility;organizational development;global trend;sustainable capacity;royal ministry;project quality;staff resource;aid evaluation;social need;transparency rule;improved public;previous evaluation;evaluation capability;continuous assessment;Funding agencies;evaluation model;poverty program;legitimate claim;intended beneficiary;building consensus;black box;national institutional;multilateral development;National Institutions;management capacity;firm commitment;access privilege;program strategy;management process;job description;administrative culture;logistical resource;significant factor;physical facility;change management;standard approach;popular participation;accountability mechanism;organization management;institution building;capital expenditure;external loan;resolution mechanism;organizational learning;active participant;market mechanism;multilateral cooperation;in-house training;monitoring indicator; ;  Monitoring & evaluation; Capacity building; Nongovernmental organizations; Proceedings; Institutional reform; Allocation of resources; Information dissemination; Information management; Civil society; Training  Réduire